AeroStorm - Mack STRYKER Coaster - No Limits 2 (FVD++)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 18

  • @CarlileCoasters
    @CarlileCoasters 5 місяців тому +1

    I absolutely love these videos. I know you don’t have many subs, but please don’t quit this and please keep doing this because these are the best no limits coasters I’ve ever seen

    • @kingIVnl2
      @kingIVnl2  5 місяців тому

      Thank you! And i promise I won't quit, definitely not anytime soon. ❤

  • @notsospoopybob
    @notsospoopybob 5 місяців тому +4

    i like it! love the flow of the elements, looks very similar to how voltron will (probably?) flow, first half reminds me of the smiler from all the dive loops, but there are maybe a few too many, could for sure do with some more diversity in inversions. also feels like inspiration was taken from ride to happiness with the interaction with the water!

  • @vincoderso2638
    @vincoderso2638 5 місяців тому +1

    The layout it self is really nice but i do need to say there are sertain parts that look not so good yet, like the banking of a few curves and the start into the launch are a bit wierd in terms of banking.

  • @wsp.ethan11
    @wsp.ethan11 5 місяців тому +2

    1st half = Maverick?

  • @guyman4155
    @guyman4155 5 місяців тому +7

    Not realistic acceleration was too fast‼️‼️🙄

    • @javiersole3565
      @javiersole3565 5 місяців тому +3

      Bro has nothing better to do than complain💀

    • @notsospoopybob
      @notsospoopybob 5 місяців тому +2

      macks have pretty powerful LSMs, they just never utilise their full power immediately, except on a few oddities like blue fire. most mack LSMs are comparable to the smaller intamin hydraulics in peak acceleration

    • @guyman4155
      @guyman4155 5 місяців тому

      @@notsospoopybob Yeah I know, it’s just a joke

  • @IClickYT
    @IClickYT 5 місяців тому +3

    Rly good but to many dive loops. No need for four

    • @mrgrass1232
      @mrgrass1232 5 місяців тому

      It’s 1 immelman and 3 dive loops

    • @IClickYT
      @IClickYT 5 місяців тому

      @@mrgrass12320:22 0:30 0:52 1:10

    • @mrgrass1232
      @mrgrass1232 5 місяців тому

      ⁠@@IClickYTyou count 0:54 as a dive loop? It doesn’t even invert

    • @IClickYT
      @IClickYT 5 місяців тому

      @@mrgrass1232i depends what you consider an inversion. i think that is an inversion personally

    • @mrgrass1232
      @mrgrass1232 5 місяців тому +1

      @@IClickYTwell there’s kinda rules to what you call an inversion. If it goes further than 135* degrees it will be called that which it doesn’t do in the inversion itself. It’s like a twisted version of Fury’s tophat (Bobbejaanland) which is stated (in rcdb) to be a Top hat