Recently I bought a book for German practice and lessons. The digital copy was provided to me quickly however I had to install an app to use it. I was literarily shocked when the app asked me to have access to my Google Drive, photos, contacts, and documents!! Of course, I didn't agree. Why on Nebula they would need such personal information? I just want to study German on my own and practice. Additionally, I just want to share the fact I am already 4 months without Facebook and Twitter... It feels really good :)) Cheers.
Mind Begs the Question: Pegasus - Hacks into iOS,Android Apple,Google - design iOS,Android Apple,Google - if leave door open,don't fix Apple,Google - not responsible,criminal?
👏👏👏 good for you! I still have both FB and Instagram. Deleted Twitter ( possible new owner ) Now definitely happy for shutting them out . Deleted Tic Tok too Slowly but surely getting off most social media
Very good reporting. The commercial exploitation of person's data without boundaries is a risk for democracy already confirmed around the world. When you consider AI to this subject, it is indeed extremely dangerous, not only a risk for democracy, but a menace for humanity itself.
Yes information that's 10 years old l. Same debate as last time. Unwashed masses don't care unless it directly and clearly affects them as an individual
Terry - Good idea - since the process is already in motion those opposed to that type of control will have to be very determined. The sheep will be an obstacle though.
From interviewed definition of surveillance (comparing to East Germany): - Following your around: Google Maps. - Microphones in your home: Google home and some mobile apps. - One of your friends informing on you: Listening and photos apps, checkins and so on can record and report data about you. There was a good study on how Facebook will track people with privacy settings using other devices near them. So, why wouldn’t you call it surveillance if all 3 arguments are satisfied?
Evans is distinguishing it from active listening, yet because all this is automative I dont think he realises the dangerous potentialities of the automated system
@@ryanreedgibson The "tech analyst" based his argument on semantics. Perhaps we should acknowledge the problem by using the correct words, instead of arguing about them like he did. His definitions were limited and dismissive. Don't be like that guy.
It's not scary it's the truth as they are taking our data regardless of how you look at it. Its surveillance as they monitor what we do online and monitor our ever move to encapsulate data.
@@ryanreedgibson We can't forever legislate and regulate. These companies behaviour are not abhorrent but they are not clear. Ask a member of the public what free means and they will say something for nothing. That isn't this, so let's clarify that and see how the public behaviour changes.
Mind Begs the Question: Pegasus - Hacks into iOS,Android Apple,Google - design iOS,Android Apple,Google - if leave door open,don't fix Apple,Google - not responsible,criminal?
Mind Begs the Question: Pegasus - Hacks into iOS,Android Apple,Google - design iOS,Android Apple,Google - if leave door open,don't fix Apple,Google - not responsible,criminal?
Targeted advertising is like blinders for a horse. By accidentally clicking on an advertising banner, you will be fed similar information, against your will. You won't be able to see ads for good and inexpensive products. You will be fed by the piece of s, because the owner of the piece of s paid more for targeted advertising.
Mind Begs the Question: Pegasus - Hacks into iOS,Android Apple,Google - design iOS,Android Apple,Google - if leave door open,don't fix Apple,Google - not responsible,criminal?
Idk, take a look to Southkorea. More cameras per capita in the cities than in chinese cities. Also you need to verfiy ur identity if you register on any website. Its still a stable democracy I would say.
Mind Begs the Question: Pegasus - Hacks into iOS,Android Apple,Google - design iOS,Android Apple,Google - if leave door open,don't fix Apple,Google - not responsible,criminal?
American culture increasingly resorts to BIG WORDS, finding relief uttering them, without offering any detail or definition. Enemies are smitten mentioning "freedom," "communism," "socialism," or "democracy." These "systems," we trust, manufacture reliable formulas for the future. "History," on the other hand, does not need a plan. History happens, without giving credit to any government, people, political party, religion, or culture. We call it "history" and assign responsibility after the natural order of things has evolved, which may be violent, peaceful, or just plain uninteresting. Conservatives take "Relief Factor," per Sebastian Gorka, EVERY DAY. The once enjoyable WILD WEST of the internet is daily falling into the detritus of CORPORATIZATION. These unholy "juridical personhoods" do not have the same interests as private human beings. They are in fact not human beings. Google a "reverse phone number look up," and a long list of "free" directories instantaneously appears, but on inquiry, none of them are actually free anymore. Like everything else in capitalism, cartelization falls into motion like vultures preying on 3-day old roadkill.
For as long as Google and alike do not share their profit with their users I personally am gonna use every addblock, ghostery and a likes together with encryption algorithms to counter my data gathering by these grifters.
This tech sector guy obviously has never worked for a corporation in the last 10 years. If they could figure out how to be in the bathroom with you they would do it. But don't take your phone or ipad in there if I were you. They listen, look, and track everything you do and say. Now they are using interface with your personal devices as well via Salesforce apps and similar platforms.
Camera footage have saved men from going to prison for life who have been falsely accused of rape by girls. Global crime rate has declined dramatically in recent modern times as compared to 50 years ago. May be surveillance is the only way we are able to tame ourselves in society and for that we will have to sacrifice privacy.
@@deletevil i understand, hopefully we can still have a Voice in This matter, since It can scalate beyond data our data infos. Both realities can exist at same time, for good or not
The keyword to the problem is not Capitalism. The keyword to the problem is ethics i.e. courtesy and manners. Capitalism doesn't create greed. Self ego creates greed. Selfishness creates greed. The keyword to Capitalism is not greed. Capitalism is about financing and continuous added-value creation. In this day and age, it is Communism that is greedy. Communists are greedy. Mr. Vladimir Putin is promoting Communist Greed around the world. My apologies for the inconvenience. 🙏🙏
Capitalism fundamentally encourages greed. Communism has different problems entirely, but pure capitalism heavily rewards you for selfish exploitation.
It should help democracy. More data is good. People can share their opinion and take influence on products and policies. It could take democracy to the next level. But the public sphere needs to catch up with the private companies and make them handle their users' data responsibly and transparently. For example people could store their data in a verified data center network, publicly funded, and the applications will only interface with these data storages. People have full control of their data and applications even don't have to worry about storing the user data. This is actually what some blockchain based networks have done.
@@WiegrafFolles I mean yea on their own platforms they do manipulate but on public platforms like youtube or twitter they don't usually have that power. On private websites it should not be surprising. On youtube and twitter there is moderation that takes care of reports, and thats it. That should probably also be more transparent though.
@@WiegrafFolles Algorithms push what people watch most and recommend what is similar to things you watch. If they ban your account its because of nudity or violence or insulting content.
When did video titles start using question marks? This is not acceptable English. Video titles just like book titles. Must make a statement not pose a question. In just two days DW has posted three meaningless videos. The premise of this story is just plain ridiculous. Democracy isn’t going anywhere. Find something meaningful to report on or just don’t report.
8:03 No, it's not terrible at all to have a one hour call across the world for free but sacrificing your privacy to Big Tech and the surveillance state is not the only or even best way to do it. There are many privacy respecting alternatives that offer similar or better services like Jitsi Meet @JitsiOrg, Signal, Matrix, Jami @jami9311 etc so this person's point is nothing but a sloppy excuse for surveillance capitalism.
Recently I bought a book for German practice and lessons. The digital copy was provided to me quickly however I had to install an app to use it. I was literarily shocked when the app asked me to have access to my Google Drive, photos, contacts, and documents!! Of course, I didn't agree. Why on Nebula they would need such personal information? I just want to study German on my own and practice. Additionally, I just want to share the fact I am already 4 months without Facebook and Twitter... It feels really good :)) Cheers.
Mind Begs the Question:
Pegasus - Hacks into iOS,Android
Apple,Google - design iOS,Android
Apple,Google - if leave door open,don't fix
Apple,Google - not responsible,criminal?
Name - good that you refused to allow. Trouble is the sheep who have no idea what is involved.
👏👏👏 good for you!
I still have both FB and Instagram.
Deleted Twitter ( possible new owner ) Now definitely happy for shutting them out . Deleted Tic Tok too
Slowly but surely getting off most social media
Very good reporting. The commercial exploitation of person's data without boundaries is a risk for democracy already confirmed around the world. When you consider AI to this subject, it is indeed extremely dangerous, not only a risk for democracy, but a menace for humanity itself.
Mind Begs the Question:
To support,aid an Apartheid State
Democratic,Fascist?
With our children also haha ....
Yes information that's 10 years old l. Same debate as last time. Unwashed masses don't care unless it directly and clearly affects them as an individual
Maybe the should be a movement to flood the data collectors with false or misleading information.
Terry - Good idea - since the process is already in motion those opposed to that type of control will have to be very determined. The sheep will be an obstacle though.
From interviewed definition of surveillance (comparing to East Germany):
- Following your around: Google Maps.
- Microphones in your home: Google home and some mobile apps.
- One of your friends informing on you: Listening and photos apps, checkins and so on can record and report data about you. There was a good study on how Facebook will track people with privacy settings using other devices near them.
So, why wouldn’t you call it surveillance if all 3 arguments are satisfied?
Evans is distinguishing it from active listening, yet because all this is automative I dont think he realises the dangerous potentialities of the automated system
It is surveillance, Evance probably doesn't understand Shoshanna's point
Simple solution, stop calling products free if the provider has a commercial interest in your data while using it.
That is not a solution, only a change in the words.
@@ryanreedgibson The "tech analyst" based his argument on semantics. Perhaps we should acknowledge the problem by using the correct words, instead of arguing about them like he did. His definitions were limited and dismissive. Don't be like that guy.
It's not scary it's the truth as they are taking our data regardless of how you look at it. Its surveillance as they monitor what we do online and monitor our ever move to encapsulate data.
@@ryanreedgibson We can't forever legislate and regulate. These companies behaviour are not abhorrent but they are not clear. Ask a member of the public what free means and they will say something for nothing. That isn't this, so let's clarify that and see how the public behaviour changes.
Mind Begs the Question:
Pegasus - Hacks into iOS,Android
Apple,Google - design iOS,Android
Apple,Google - if leave door open,don't fix
Apple,Google - not responsible,criminal?
absolutely. knowledge is power and american meritocracy is a myth
Mind Begs the Question:
Pegasus - Hacks into iOS,Android
Apple,Google - design iOS,Android
Apple,Google - if leave door open,don't fix
Apple,Google - not responsible,criminal?
Targeted advertising is like blinders for a horse. By accidentally clicking on an advertising banner, you will be fed similar information, against your will.
You won't be able to see ads for good and inexpensive products. You will be fed by the piece of s, because the owner of the piece of s paid more for targeted advertising.
Love the topic
UA-cam gathers information on everything you say, watch and do! It's run by Google! Have a nice day!
Mind Begs the Question:
Pegasus - Hacks into iOS,Android
Apple,Google - design iOS,Android
Apple,Google - if leave door open,don't fix
Apple,Google - not responsible,criminal?
@@HumanBeingsRThinkingBeings 😬
Short answer: YES.
No more copyrighting code!!
surveillance is any1 gathering personnel Information without your consent.
For real? This has been a problem since the 2000's. People are really slow at keeping up with the times.
Idk, take a look to Southkorea. More cameras per capita in the cities than in chinese cities.
Also you need to verfiy ur identity if you register on any website. Its still a stable democracy I would say.
Yes, the title is bad.
"Threat to personal liberty" is more fitting.
Give people easy and free access to their own data!!!
You would think that data would at some point be able to know what the will of the people is.
Have a survey instead of politicians voting.
Welcome to the All American Way, Europe you are screwed.
DW News: Turning privacy into profit: Is data the death of democracy?
Google LLC: What privacy?
Mind Begs the Question:
Pegasus - Hacks into iOS,Android
Apple,Google - design iOS,Android
Apple,Google - if leave door open,don't fix
Apple,Google - not responsible,criminal?
I think there is no way to escape to be collected our datas :(
Oscan - defeatist attitude not helpful. Others in these comments are making suggestions that need to be adopted and developed.
@@niburu1508 I strongly believe in Microsoft and Google data collection.
adblock, ghostery and many more alike just to name few.
@@BrainofGg 🥴
Mind Begs the Question:
To support,aid an Apartheid State
Democratic,Fascist?
Regulate RTB, Google, Facebook etc…
"Data" is the new "property"
American culture increasingly resorts to BIG WORDS, finding relief uttering them, without offering any detail or definition. Enemies are smitten mentioning "freedom," "communism," "socialism," or "democracy." These "systems," we trust, manufacture reliable formulas for the future. "History," on the other hand, does not need a plan. History happens, without giving credit to any government, people, political party, religion, or culture. We call it "history" and assign responsibility after the natural order of things has evolved, which may be violent, peaceful, or just plain uninteresting. Conservatives take "Relief Factor," per Sebastian Gorka, EVERY DAY. The once enjoyable WILD WEST of the internet is daily falling into the detritus of CORPORATIZATION. These unholy "juridical personhoods" do not have the same interests as private human beings. They are in fact not human beings. Google a "reverse phone number look up," and a long list of "free" directories instantaneously appears, but on inquiry, none of them are actually free anymore. Like everything else in capitalism, cartelization falls into motion like vultures preying on 3-day old roadkill.
For as long as Google and alike do not share their profit with their users I personally am gonna use every addblock, ghostery and a likes together with encryption algorithms to counter my data gathering by these grifters.
Unfortunately this video has fewer views than people twerking or eating surf excel pods...
Time to start boycotting for parity....good luck haha consumer sentiment rules and ruins
This tech sector guy obviously has never worked for a corporation in the last 10 years. If they could figure out how to be in the bathroom with you they would do it. But don't take your phone or ipad in there if I were you. They listen, look, and track everything you do and say. Now they are using interface with your personal devices as well via Salesforce apps and similar platforms.
It's a beyond this 😢 I feel 😅
The part of the one world 🌎 system.
We are a constitutional republic not a democracy..get it straight
Use Signal!!! 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
How about paying people for data and making it optional?
Corey - why would they pay when dopes give it to them for apps that are presented as FREE?
Facebook pride of selling ur data
Mind Begs the Question:
If TikTok caused no Genocide
If Facebook caused Religious Genocide,Civil War in Myanmar
Must Ban - TikTok,Facebook?
Pls take all our data and create a hive mind.
Completely incompetent people, raving and misleading others
People Will trade freedom/privacy at the cost of freedom because of fear, sadly
Camera footage have saved men from going to prison for life who have been falsely accused of rape by girls.
Global crime rate has declined dramatically in recent modern times as compared to 50 years ago.
May be surveillance is the only way we are able to tame ourselves in society and for that we will have to sacrifice privacy.
@@deletevil i understand, hopefully we can still have a Voice in This matter, since It can scalate beyond data our data infos. Both realities can exist at same time, for good or not
@@cassioberger1250Agreed!
The one good idea Andrew Yang has was establishing a universal basic income that draws money from the value big tech extracts from us using our data.
no it's not. it's fueling democracy's budgets.
Unconditional right to stop our own life medically whenever we want for all adults, my body my choice.
this lady is silly
The keyword to the problem is not Capitalism. The keyword to the problem is ethics i.e. courtesy and manners.
Capitalism doesn't create greed. Self ego creates greed. Selfishness creates greed. The keyword to Capitalism is not greed. Capitalism is about financing and continuous added-value creation.
In this day and age, it is Communism that is greedy. Communists are greedy. Mr. Vladimir Putin is promoting Communist Greed around the world.
My apologies for the inconvenience. 🙏🙏
Capitalism is not the problem. Human greed is the problem. Nowadays it is the Communists who are greedy.
My apologies. 🙏🙏
Capitalism and democracy are fundamentally incompatible.
Capitalism fundamentally encourages greed. Communism has different problems entirely, but pure capitalism heavily rewards you for selfish exploitation.
We need one world one government no more war.
exactly, I fully support one world government.
And you think wars then stop?
😆
It should help democracy. More data is good. People can share their opinion and take influence on products and policies. It could take democracy to the next level. But the public sphere needs to catch up with the private companies and make them handle their users' data responsibly and transparently. For example people could store their data in a verified data center network, publicly funded, and the applications will only interface with these data storages. People have full control of their data and applications even don't have to worry about storing the user data. This is actually what some blockchain based networks have done.
@@WiegrafFolles not true
@@WiegrafFolles not where I live and on youtube I have never had my comments deleted.
@@WiegrafFolles I mean yea on their own platforms they do manipulate but on public platforms like youtube or twitter they don't usually have that power. On private websites it should not be surprising. On youtube and twitter there is moderation that takes care of reports, and thats it. That should probably also be more transparent though.
@@WiegrafFolles Algorithms push what people watch most and recommend what is similar to things you watch. If they ban your account its because of nudity or violence or insulting content.
@@distrologic2925 Twitter silenced some reputable people. Just FYI
When did video titles start using question marks? This is not acceptable English. Video titles just like book titles. Must make a statement not pose a question. In just two days DW has posted three meaningless videos. The premise of this story is just plain ridiculous. Democracy isn’t going anywhere. Find something meaningful to report on or just don’t report.
Find something meaningful to comment or just don't comment. Don't like it? Don't watch it.
Data is the new gold 🪙🪙
I am standing in a corner without smartphone,the ai sends a person there
It was a government office park,all the people in the road started using smartphones and taking selfies suddenly
8:03 No, it's not terrible at all to have a one hour call across the world for free but sacrificing your privacy to Big Tech and the surveillance state is not the only or even best way to do it. There are many privacy respecting alternatives that offer similar or better services like Jitsi Meet @JitsiOrg, Signal, Matrix, Jami @jami9311 etc so this person's point is nothing but a sloppy excuse for surveillance capitalism.