DJE Media Shows Us Why Auditing Is Wrong
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 жов 2024
- DJE Media is one of several major auditing channels that I haven’t got round to, until now. Today I take a brief look at him for the first time. He was late to the scene and his style of auditing is a blend of different approaches. Here I look at one of his methods, which is found on his sister channel, DJE PINAC, and involves turning up at commercial premises (typically, prestige car showrooms) and walking around filming without prior permission. I explain why this seemingly harmless activity shows us why auditing is wrong and ought to stop.
Footage is copyright of DJE PINAC, used here under fair dealing.
What part of NO FILMING me don't you understand?:
• What part of NO FILMIN...
DJE PINAC UA-cam Channel:
/ @djepinac
DJE Media UA-cam Channel:
/ @djemedia88
Entick v Carrington [1765] EWHC KB J98:
www.bailii.org...
Part 5 of Schedule 2 of the Data Protection Act 2018 (Special Purposes Exemption):
www.legislatio...
Article 4 of the UK GDPR:
gdpr-info.eu/a...
Article 6 of the UK GDPR:
gdpr-info.eu/a...
Article 13 of the UK GDPR:
gdpr-info.eu/a...
Regulation 2 of the Data Protection (Charges and Information) Regulations 2018:
www.legislatio...
Channel Theme:
Music:- ASHUTOSH - Utopia
Watch:- • ASHUTOSH - Utopia
www.ashutoshmu...
He's the ultimate passive-aggressive. He knows exacrly how annoying that approach is.
He likes filming through windows (bedroom windows) and has been seen to hover his drone at window levels to film inside.
He’s flown dangerously over railways and was recently warned by police for flying with no visual line of sight - an interaction that police put on record, being told the next time he was caught doing this he wouldn’t be so lucky.
He uses the drone more aggressively than the camera, to simply wind people up.
Unlike these people, you're actually doing a service to the public, great stuff 👍
He have the charisma of a shark... and he causes the same feeling in his victims.
DJE was Curtis Media, but after he hit the headlines last year, social media took him off so he started up again as DJE Media.
There is a DJE Media listed at Companies House but it is nothing to do with Curtis.
Curtis is listed at Companies House as Lynxus Ltd. When he claims to be a member of the public, he is a limited comany, there for financial gain, not a member of the public.
Sometimes in these showrooms he says he wont film staff, but he does, he has his covert bodycam running all the time, filming and posting people who say they dont wish to be filmed and posted on media.
If I was being filmed in a business by a filmer, I would ask the business for a Subject Access Request for the footage he has with me on, but thats just me.
Watch him try and strike you for this and if he does, please counter as you are giving commentary under fair use!
Thanks.
This is a great alternative perspective for people who consume auditing videos. Most reasonable people, dare I say it even those who enjoy auditing videos know deep down it’s shitty behaviour.
There may be a case for the earlier police videos but targeting normal people doing their jobs or going about their lives is just crap.
He was ok when he first started but since he has bought a drone suddenly he has come out of the Martie Blagborough school of auditing he has changed from a gentleman auditor to an arshole auditor i used to enjoy his auditing I was 1 of his first subscribers I have un subscribed from both of his channels DJE media and DJE Pillock
Isn't he the ex prisoner who hunts dead bodies?
Yes
He’s a sex offender
ua-cam.com/users/shortsO01N6mWKbZ8?si=gCMlPSy7qQhbh9l9
Walking quickly past cars while swinging the camera around is hardly an effective means of giving information to one's subscribers. Surely still photos are a much more effective way of showing a subject. Anyone with a professional interest in car dealerships would know how to show the cars on offer. Of course, frauditors have no interest in what they film. They just do it to create situations and harass employees and members of the public.
Absolutely agree when dje says I do car showroom think it's safe to assume the cars will be the focus but unfortunately the cars become the side show but I guess you have to realise once an auditor always an auditor
Whilst his mannerisms in these videos may seem to come across as 'polite' one could always argue that to turn up at somebody's private premises to record without introducing yourself and asking for permission, is in itself bordering on rude behaviour. Never mind putting on the internet and earning revenue from it. Looking at some of his other videos, this is probably one of the 'better' ones you chose to look at.
Absolutely agree 100% normal business etc will conduct their approach and business ina far more professional and respectful manner but I do think.as this situation is a relatively new concept when dje turns up unannounced I think it catches some dealerships off guard but gradually I think that will change and the dealership will put some thing in place to prevent this situation occurring again and protect their business
@@bertblaser And to be honest, I don't have too much of an issue with someone wanting to turn up unannounced, but they have to understand, that they are trying their luck when they do that, and the business concerned is under no obligation to allow him access. This is where these 'auditors' fall down for me, because they seem to have developed the notion that they can do their video and upload it from wherever they like, irrespective of the company's wishes.
The dealers may put policies in place and even signage, but I doubt that will stop some of these 'auditors', they will just march on to demand a copy of their policy and why it is that way.
Totally agree with you but one thing you didn’t mention which annoys me more than all the other auditors is this guy’s false laugh… extremely irritating.
Why is he talking like somebody with false teeth, the melt.
He's got cheap veneers in, Turkey Teeth 😂
@@pennybunny lol certainly sounds like it 😁😂
*grabs onto monitor for no reason weirdly* 😂
His interaction with the guy at about 14mins is very DJ Audits....
dj audits copy cat, a proper bell end
It is quite refreshing to see a disection of this auditor, using refrences to law vs "his" rights.
I feel that it is truly for a reaction, rather than interesting content. Had it included salient information on products, then it would be of more value.
Definitely right to have an element of scepticism.
Why on earth is he filming people at work selling expensive cars?
He spends most of his time in these dealerships telling the staff about how they can react in two ways and the viewers like both, he just keeps repeating himself over and over again. He talks more about his channels than the companies he visits. His migrant hotel videos were good though, I must say that. And he is polite. I'm not comfortable with going in to these private businesses and expecting to be welcomed, maybe let them know you're going to film outside but that's about it. If I was buying a car I wouldn't want someone recording it
his videos on the migrant hotels are very informative and you have to say he has balls , especially with the hostility and assaults he has recieved for doing a better job of informing the public than the entire mainstream media outlets put together, but i do think he out stays his welcome in less important scenarios
Those videos were just fodder for his racist subscribers.
@@n700rat Racism is the easiest accusation to make and the hardest accusation to prove, it is a product of lazy thinking.
THE problem, when auditors trespass, is their victims not knowing their rights under trespass law.
Be it police, council employees, security guards, or private companies, they rarely know their true authority to remove unwanted visitors.
This guy had been leaving from the start of the video, literally hanging around trying to goad a negative reaction. He knew he had a boring video so tried really hard to get content. Not a “journalist”!
Ive seen numerous videos of dje and for an auditor he comes across as being polite but when hes ask to leave the toys come out the pram the ferrari visit was a shocker there was no filming allowed he continued and protesting why no filming the poor lady at the desk ask him 4 times please do not film me the manager politely ask him to leave and eventually he did but then decided to get the drone out the drone was very close to the glass windows filming and zooming inon staff for reaction i guess on a lot of occasions a manager will ask for the name u tube channel etc etc dje will decline that until the video is made if staff have been confrontational he wont proivde that information if how ever you've been good boyyou might be lucky
Im not sure how much longer he'll be able to do what he does these showrooms are generally part of chain and they have a head office managers have been sent memoirs from head office no filming allowed like i said for an auditor its normal behaviour but normal people have far higher standards
The Ferrari vide was quite interesting as during that another photographer walked in just as DJE was being led out by the manager. Upon hearing that no photography was allowed inside, they just shrugged their shoulders and walked straight back out, likely to move on to find somewhere else to photograph. A much more reasonable and professional approach instead of arguing the toss, like DJE did.
That Ferrari video has also be taken down and reposted a few times now as well.
@three-phase562
Absolutely agree
On all his videos when's dje told to leave the toys
come out the pram
I have to agree. I stopped watching. It's nothing to do with the cars. it's more about the reaction of the employees.
As soon as these car dealerships get wind of this, they will throw him out without much interaction.
This guy is a baddy, he doesn't appreciate anything, that manager was unbelievably generous and accommodating despte receiving complaints about the "auditor", he is ruining everything for nice UA-camrs who would like to film in the future. Disgusting. PSYOP? False Flag?
He has come a long way from filming bodies being removed from the river !!
That guy b4nned me immediately just for mentioning this video in his chat, including your channel name ... Can't make this up
Shows it's having an effect. They really don't like this channel.
@@streetvideoreviewer Yeah, like literally I just said "Some guy made a video on you, Street Video Reviewer". He answered "so what" and boom I was bIocked.
Other funny part is that I was actually sent here through UA-cam-autplay, right after one of his videos, haha
@@swires1 Sounds like UA-cam are doing something good for a change.
@@streetvideoreviewer Apparently now some of these fools have stumbled into "jewish territory" and this becomes their new theme. They really have no clue what they're getting themselves into 😆
One day I hope it all comes to them
Street video reviewer, just out of interest do you report these auditors to the ICO as you mention in most of your videos that these monitised Auditors are subject to gdpr etc.
DJE is as CREEPY as HECK!!!
Very interesting video this is all about dje media thanks again 👍
I forget what this guys channel was originally before the Curtis branding but he used to stand all hours at certain fords waiting for cars to get stuck 🤣
Bit of a chancer this one.
Keep up the good work
Thanks for posting this i thoroughly enjoyed it.I cant abide DJ/DJE media.He always looks dirty and grubby and always talks like he needs to blow his nose and cough up phlem.I believe his pinac channel channel is his auditing channel and media is his other stuff.
Let’s be honest, he does regularly cough up phlegm whilst talking. It’s revolting listening to it through his mic.
Curtis likes filming ladies.
He always says hes a member of the public when he is a limited company at Companies House. He goes around doing what he does for financial gain. He films people's faces and voices for financial gain. GDPR?
I feel this business arent used to people coming in filming, this will be why they didnt trespass him.
Regarding the showrooms who have chucked him out, I don't feel their business will have been affected at all, people buying top dollar cars won't be watching these videos. If they do they may like the staff removing undesireables from the showroom.
@sc0pe103 look him up at Companies House.
No Im not on drugs
A sole director of a limited company.
This makes him a limited company and GDPR definately applies to him.
He always claims to be an innocent member of the public, he is far away from being innocent and definately not a member of the public, there for financial gain.
He is not a limited company at companies house that DJE Media is the original before Curtis started using their name .
@@rogerbroadbelt3424 That is a different DJE Media Curtis is using the name illegally
@@kjb40Curtis is registered at Companies House as Lynxus Ltd.
His UA-cam channel was Curtis Media, but after he hit the headlines last year, it was took off, so he started up again as DJE Media.
Yes, someone else is registered at Companies House as that name.
@@rogerbroadbelt3424 Are we sure it is the same Curtis Arnold he used to live in Kidderminster where he was brought up before he moved to Swindon after he was named in the papers and his past was printed ?
I personally unsubscribe from DJE as i found his videos just annoying and unhelpful.
When they get a reaction like PJ did at the scrap yard "PHONE THE POLICE" HHHEEELLLP they've blocked me car in
He thinks hes being clever going over and filming and distracting the staff. Be a shame if we know the name of the dealership and forward them the link and inform them. they can file a privacy claim. And have all monetizezation deducted ect...
That is what should happen in each and every case, but i would be a time-consuming exercise.
For your information my friend. Most of the dealers that he shows, at least one person from that company's watches and gives feed back
@@BritishBulldog545 Oh really? And I suppose they pay him to do this too?
In his dreams.
@@streetvideoreviewer UA-cam pay him.also he had his own business. He was a barber. Don't know whether is still owns it
@@BritishBulldog545 Not the same as what you said just now.
Very interesting and informative.
If as they say, their covert camera is always on. (Visually, there is no way of telling if the camera is on or off). What happens when they go to a public accessible toilet? If I were a customer of one of these dealerships and went to the toilet, I wouldn't be too pleased if one of these auditors came in and stood next to me. Whose to say what they do with the footage.
whats worse is everyone in the comments on his vids cheering him on. very smug guy thats too intrusive. goes to silly places to bully and antagonise normal people working. but hes getting a nice big payout every month. so hes gona continue until made to stop.
@street video reviews. I did some checking and as its a private buissness he needs permission to film on private property. If he was outside on public land he could fill the buissnes. And as he has his video monitize they could obtain a privacy order and have the video removed from youtube. This is what ive managed to find out. Lol as i just finished writing it youjust said qhat i said 😂😂😂. My bad
Porsche loved his visit, Ferrari not so much, lol
But once the Porsche garage found out who he was after the fact they did regret their interaction with him.
His subscribers like to leave bad reviews for the dealerships where they haven’t allowed him to film. This is so wrong, these are working people in private business’s. Just because he’s unemployable he wants to harass those who are working.
This person is like a Mosquito buzzing round your head 😡. His sole purpose is to walk round with 20+ cameras shoving them through open windows and into peoples faces to create !!DRAMA!! When the drama goes wrong he cry's like a little child looking for candy from people 🤔 Camera ON/OFF he informs people it is off but in fact is recording them 🤔
This guy is really bad worsted auditor out, now I watch and support auditors in public places which can be useful but this guy is an absolute pest
He talks in riddles to justify his behaviour. I would chuck him out even if he wanted to buy a car!
It’s easy to say but the less interaction the staff have or anyone with these plebs the better … they want it to keep them there longer and cross talk and put staff off by throwing more dribble in trying to put them off
Yeah DJE deliberately provokes and trolls. It's kinda subtle at times but you'll notice the pattern after watching a few of his videos.
Like for example when he brings up the drone, he usually does it to escalate the situation.
@@swires1 and makes sure he tells you more times than needs to and likes flashing it around rattling it ..waiting and baiting them
He was Curtis Media his Grans House got turned upside down during the NB episode, what I didn't like about him was he had Paul Ansil in the frame( so to speak) for murder and even put Paul's address on internet.
Curtis also went out one night a young lady was drunk he was filming her at a kebab shop she was really very drunk, she grabbed his phone and chucked it on the ground . I believed that was immoral of him to harass drunk person like that.
Sure yes his morals are highly questionable however his "investigations " of hotels being used to house illegal immigrants arguably are in the public interest, we need to know what the government is up to.
I admire his indefatigability however ,after the cops roughed him up (NB case ) ,most normal people would have given up, he was banned from Lancashire, after that he kept going ,rebuilt his channel got on with it.
I have certain level of respect for him, but I might be completely wrong , he is not a tw*t like Nigel is best I can come up with
Good video thanks .
LOL, What Investigation of hotels being used to house immigrants? There is no investigation needed as the government announced it would do exactly that. I stay near one of those hotels and there are protests outside it all the time, the arguments make no sense to me as crowds of agitators proclaim that woman and kids are no longer safe in the area, almost as if crime did not exist before the hotel was occupied. And the protestors had the wrong end of the stick as the hotel was occupied by Asylum seekers and not illegal immigrants. People like Curtis look for a story that fits their narrative, the man is deeply unpleasant and has a chip on his shoulder and is looking to blame a group of people in society for his lot in life, but all I see is a racist roided up nonce who sounds like he has a gobstopper permanently stuck in his mouth. I took great pride in contacting that Ferrari Dealer ( a personal friend of mine) to provide the links to his YT channel and let him know how he can raise a privacy strike against him.
@@kindcitizen-oe5ck nobody has ever claimed that crime didnt exist before the arrival of people from foreign lands. This is a complete strawman argument and is extremely dishonest.
What is true is that there is often a sharp increase in crime in areas where migrants settle this increase gets even worse with the second and third generations (migrants children and grandchildren).
Go to any area in the UK with a high number of ethnic minorities and you will see that crime is higher when compared to other areas in the same region with low numbers of ethnic minorities. This is just a fact of life unfortunately. The less white and british an area becomes the more crime increases, especially violent crime.
You may be able to find a rare exception to the rule but this is overwhelmingly true in almost every case.
More than one of his migrant hotel videos were appalling - especially as he encourages racism, but there was one particular hotel, where a young employee pleaded with him not to video him and upload it. Arnold was really enjoying the interaction - he had filmed the guy while he was inside the hotel trespassing, but he was blatantly bullying the employee, almost laughing at the employees obvious distress. It was really painful viewing.
@@dirtyharold7164 Please provide statistics to back up your claim then, and I mean facts not just nonsense spewed from someone on facebook.
Curtis Arnold/DJE Media, documented it all himself. It’s all on his UA-cam channel.
I do believe this guy is hunting. 😢
Thanks for sharing this channel with me, I really like his style
the best thing to do to get rid of them is simple turn the music as youtube would not put the video on coz of copy rights
Unfortunately, that doesn't work.
Fantastic video shared 👏
I'm surprised these audits are allowed to be honest. They are pretty distasteful.
They are in work and working, maybe they don't want to be there on the best of days, blimey they need to leave work places alone especially when you are making people feel clearly uncomfortable, but I bet half these auditors have a mask and baseball cap.
Most of them turn up masked. They are cowards.
There is a video out of an auditor fliming in a Games Workshop store.
Which one is that?
It’s Bare Britain Audits videos titled Dans been playing with toys far too long
@@colinpenfold9890 Thanks. I haven't got round to Bare Britain Audits yet. I will be taking a lengthy break from the channel soon, but if I'm still doing this later in 2024, I may cover him.
Just for context that store is connected with a visit to Warhammer world UA-cam is not letting me post the links unfortunately. Security Guard Denies Needing A SIA Card & Breaking The Law. That’s the title.
Completely understandable you need to take a break I can see how work you put into these videos.
I hope you have a happy new and I’ll see you in 2024 😊
@@colinpenfold9890 Thanks and Happy New Year!
hes about as much wanted as a wasp at a picnic
if thay have more than one ch if say got 2 do thay get paid for both of them
Yes.
@@streetvideoreviewer so he makes a video then post s it on all 3 gets paid 3 times for the video
@@PeterBurt-l1v Yes, because the payment is for advertising revenue, so in that sense makes no difference to UA-cam, and it's his own content, not someone else's. However, UA-cam can still flag it as 'duplicate content', either due to the algorithm or someone reporting it, and if he makes a habit of it, there is a chance that the video or his whole channel could be demonetised. Given that it is his own content, it would only become an issue for him if he is doing it all the time - i.e. every video or every other video or something like that.
Çu n r 😂He iis😂
You mean Camera User Not Trained
he never filmed one car and talked about it that tell you every thing hes doing filming folk
Because that's not how he works, that's why.
@@BritishBulldog545 how does it work then
30:38 wow filming customers WTAF? he's unlikely to want to go back!
They seem flying a drone is a clever way around tresspass. But unfortunately. As far as im aware buissnesses own the sky up to a 1000ft above their property😂, so im afraid they may ve othwr more serious charges flying a drine above the footprint of a private buissnesses land👍any customers in that private car ahowroom and staff are entitled to privacy as its not public as such form how i understand. But this guy swems polite up till now
Occupiers do own the airspace to the extent required to undertake their normal lawful activities and any interference in this would be an aerial trespass. To my knowledge, the law specifies no fixed limit of height, it's something to be determined on a case by case basis and turns on the facts.
@@stuartchester6899 I didn't say film I said own. When you buy a property you have below your property and a portion above the property. It us d to be above to the heavens and down to the center of the earth. Otherwise people could build a basement under your property or a overhang from a neighbouring adjacent property and have it over hang you property. Do you not own land? Check your rights 3 dimensional ask your solicitor. Above a certain hight that for airspace now planes and commercial flights. That's why you can fly a drone on your land. You could do a legal Google search . Because you think doesn't make it true.
@@stuartchester6899 Are you confusing me with the other person here? I agree that he is not quite right. I have already stated what the correct position is. Let me repeat:
Occupiers do own the airspace above land and buildings to the extent required to undertake their normal lawful activities and any interference in this would be an aerial trespass. To my knowledge, the law specifies no fixed limit of height, it's something to be determined on a case by case basis and turns on the facts.
To add, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) does not 'own' airspace, merely regulates and authorises activity in airspace. Who actually 'owns' per se the airspace at any particular height and what is permissible at any height is not necessarily a black and white question because, as explained, it depends on (amongst other things) whether an activity interferes in the normal lawful use of the land by the occupier.
In practical real world terms, a drone operator could go ahead and fly his drone over commercial premises on the basis that this is permissible under the Drone Regulations, but this is not the only consideration in law because it is possible to commit an aerial trespass even when the flight is otherwise compliant with the Drone Regulations. There is however some overlap between the Drone Regulations and trespass law. I've actually gone into this very issue in my videos about DJ Audits and BP Visits.
As well as trespass, you also have to consider general criminal law, including public order offences, breaches of the peace, harassment, maybe even communications offences, and some of that will entail civil wrongs as well.
@@stuartchester6899 It's not. I am simply stating the law. I can't have you spreading misinformation on here, so please don't comment on my channel any further.
if all of this is true, then why are they still doing this and being paid...
Because UA-cam are paid.
@streetvideoreviewer what does that mean? So, to stop this (which seems to be your angle), then youtube needs to stop paying them?
Tressass is not unlawful its civil so thats incorrect
Trespass is unlawful. Ironic that you say I am incorrect but you can't even get that one simple thing right. Simple trespass is a civil matter. Aggravated trespass is a criminal matter. Where am I incorrect in the video?
@@streetvideoreviewer because its not aggravated unless he refused to leave thats how
There nothing ironic about me either considering I've been doing it for a very long time I know the its and outs police will do nothing unless he refuses to leave then its criminal otherwise they cannot do nothing same as security guards can do nothing
Can you just remind me please of what “ civil” means exactly, when applied to trespass. I know it means it’s not criminal, so why do the police say some things are not a crime, but say other things are “civil”. They’d say eating crisps in public is not against the law, but they don’t say eating crisps in public is a civil matter. Just curious. You sound like you know. Thanks.
@@marinka424 no thats not how it works lmao
Civil tresspass is what's in question which these muppets who tell them its criminal are stupid
Say I had someone park on my drive at my house thats civil as its trsspass IF they refuse to move the car I can forceably move it and nothing they can do nor the police
@@StraightOuttaUrbex You clearly don't know the ins and outs of it. First, if I recall it right, I did not accuse him of aggravated trespass. My reference to that offence was in reply to you, not the video. However, on reflection, I think he was committing an aggravated trespass. See section 68 of the Criminal Justice & Public Order Act 1994 for a definition of the offence. Second, aggravated trespass does not require that he refuse to leave (though that can be an ingredient of the offence).
Turning to the video, he did fail to leave when asked, and though I conclude he was trespassing from the outset, a condition of him being permitted to stay was that he should seek the consent of anybody he photographed, and he did not do so, therefore he was trespassing just on that basis. I gave him the benefit of the doubt at the beginning, but I was being extremely generous in doing so.
His reason for not giving information is because of people complaining about his videos "and thus" affecting the amount of money made on the video's 🤔 !!THE HATERS!! is used to justify lying. This all comes under the word !!AUDITING!! To blur people out is too much effort it's a lot of time 🤔 and hard work. (GDPR) Does not apply to him simply because he is not working 🤔 Ha Ha Ha
its because he as a SEXUAL HARM PREVENTION ORDER
Auditing isn't 'wrong'. That's subjective opinion. Policing judges gov's wars... That's a different matter!
It's more than just a subjective opinion, it's the law.
i am once again reminding you that youtubers count as journalists not data controllers which as per you ignore
The exemption is for journalism not journalists - an important distinction. He is not carrying out journalism. Please also note that a journalist (or his employer) has to register as a data controller if he processes personal data.
He is not a journalist. UA-cam content does not in any way automatically become journalism.
Auditing isn't journalism.
yall know that being mad about the fact these guys classify as journos doesn't change it right?
@@KalebsRevenge You're right. It doesn't change the fact that they are not in any way journalists. They do not carry out journalism.
Prestige cars are wrong, making things most People could never afford.. the bigger the wealth gap, the more violence You can expect in society..
Actually is 2nd channel audit the dealer for a while now. Get it right. And second why you making a video on someone with a camera.
If you don't like it, don't watch it. Is not really classed as an auditor.
I agree with you that he shouldn't be calling himself an auditor. He couldn't audit wetness on a rainy day.
Hi have you got an email address. You mentioned in a comment somewhere, but i can't find it. Thanks.
hello@streetvideoreviewer.com
@streetvideoreviewer hi the email address is showing invalid email address. Thanks.
@@davidwatson9124 That is the e-mail address. If you just type it in manually, it should work.
hello[at]streetvideoreviewer.com
I personally unsubscribe from DJE as i found his videos just annoying and unhelpful.