Conjugate Beam Method - Tricky Continuous Beam with Cantilever Solved Example

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лют 2025
  • Difficult problem using the conjugate beam method. Tips and tricks on where to cut the beam and how to find slope and deflection.
    Link to the introduction to conjugate beams video: • Conjugate Beam Method ...
    VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT www.afmatheng.com/ !!!
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Now try to solve it on your OWN! Don't just "understand"... PRACTICE!!
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    AF MATH AND ENGINEERING - Students Helping Students!
    Join our Community! =)
    -------------------------------------
    Follow us on Twitter at / afmatheng
    Follow us on Facebook at www.facebook.c...
    #math #civilengineering #engineering #education #edchat #lrnchat #blendchat #mlearning #elearning #ipadchat #pblchat #passiondriven #blendedlearning #ccchat #ccss #commoncore #competencyed #curriculum #deeperlearning #digln #earlyed #edapp #eddata #edleaders #edpolicy #edtech #education #elearning #highschool #leadership #middleschool #literacy #engchat #mathchat #scichat #stem #highered #calculus

КОМЕНТАРІ • 42

  • @AFMathandEngineering
    @AFMathandEngineering  7 років тому +1

    Let us know if you want to see more structural analysis videos!
    Link to an our intro video and another example problem: ua-cam.com/video/QsNvwRQVkBE/v-deo.html

  • @sushilbhutada1644
    @sushilbhutada1644 5 років тому +14

    One location by mistake taken as 3.92 but actually it should be 3.82 and in one location while calculating displacement multiply dimension has taken 3/2 but it should be 2/3.

  • @gopikaselvi4337
    @gopikaselvi4337 5 років тому +2

    It's a very good video to understand the conjugate beam method of analysis...
    We need a clarification on resolving the 3span continuous beam with all the ends are simply supported. . Could you suggest us the trick.. !

  • @sonshadowshadow5546
    @sonshadowshadow5546 6 років тому +2

    If i maynot be wrong for getting deflection at D. ,you can calculate D(y) reaction at fix end and then taking only right side of internal hinge since moment =0 and calculate moment at fixed end will be easier .

  • @markusbryant6789
    @markusbryant6789 3 роки тому +1

    Is there a reason why you can’t just split the hinge and find internal shear and moment without finding the reaction at D?

  • @alpereneylenceoglu7404
    @alpereneylenceoglu7404 6 років тому +1

    You are amazing. Thanks, Conjugate beam is easy for me after this video. 👍

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 років тому

      Alperen Eylenceoglu thanks so much! Were glad we could help you out!

  • @billmorrison5908
    @billmorrison5908 5 років тому +1

    you are the man! this is a great video. thanks so much

  • @apollodamonbuilders
    @apollodamonbuilders 5 років тому

    Your sign convection for the moment was: Anticlockwise as positive, but when solving for moment of the conjugate at D, you took Ay as a negative moment yet it is in the anticlockwise direction. Why?

  • @crunchbox7698
    @crunchbox7698 6 років тому +1

    Thanks broo.. Now I fully understand 😉

  • @orbital16
    @orbital16 4 роки тому

    Hi there @10:22 about the term 564/70(2340) = 0.00344 rad.
    Dis you get that answer exactly it is? I am using Casio 991Es calculator and Im getting 3.4432x10^-3 which i still need to press the back arrow to get the answer youve got..

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  4 роки тому

      That level of accuracy is really not important, maybe if you had a really strict teacher, especially not in real life structural engineering.

  • @Trump_Gaming
    @Trump_Gaming Рік тому

    Why didn't you take into account the parabolic loading when doing the reaction at A? You only did the 3 triangles.

  • @civilographybsbd1817
    @civilographybsbd1817 4 роки тому +1

    Thanku that was really helpful.

  • @vanbeet5105
    @vanbeet5105 6 років тому +1

    I'm a little confused about the sign convention you've used, is anti clockwise supposed to be positive or negative

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 років тому

      van béet thanks for the comment! Can you give us an example of where you're confused specifically so we can help you out? Cheers :D

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 років тому

      Also to further clarify, Almost always the positive sign conventions we use for bending for beams is compression on top, tension on bottom and counterclockwise (+ve) for moments.

    • @vanbeet5105
      @vanbeet5105 6 років тому

      I'm not from the US, so probably the conventions we use are quite different.
      In other videos, i also noticed that in the drawing of the bending moment diagram, when the line or curve occurs below the baseline i. e if the beam sags, the moment is labeled as negative. At our university, we are taught that a sagging beam has positive moment, which is also clockwise

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 років тому +1

      I see. Everywhere has different convention. Usually in practice I'll draw the bending moment on the tension side of the beam, however in most textbooks it's on the opposite side for positive moment. I'm from canada btw :) thanks for sharing the different convention that you use at your school! What year are you currently in? Cheers!

    • @vanbeet5105
      @vanbeet5105 6 років тому

      I'm in second year, doing civil engineering
      Anyway, thanks for the great content, your videos have been very useful

  • @gabrielefolino4005
    @gabrielefolino4005 4 роки тому +3

    isn't it 3.92 x (2/3) not (3/2) when finding moment @ C?

  • @itsme-tg4dr
    @itsme-tg4dr 6 років тому +5

    how you get the 3.92?

  • @gigipensiri979
    @gigipensiri979 3 роки тому

    Thank you, I appreciate it

  • @zjyub
    @zjyub 4 роки тому

    (2417060 Nm^3)/((706N/m^2)(0.00234m^4) does not equal 14mm?? Did you mean 706GPa?

  • @harshitsingh6954
    @harshitsingh6954 4 роки тому

    what if we have to find deflection at b point

  • @kennethdevera2561
    @kennethdevera2561 6 років тому

    when you solved for the new reaction at A, why did you only consider moment at left of "C" and didn't include the parabolic side?

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 років тому

      Because of the hinge at c, we can separate the beam into two parts, AC and CD and solve them independently.

    • @haeseoya3123
      @haeseoya3123 6 років тому

      @@AFMathandEngineering But why did you calculate all when you solved slope D and deflection D?

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 років тому

      Because we need the reaction at the hinge.

  • @badabc6969
    @badabc6969 5 років тому +1

    Please make more

  • @Corvanor
    @Corvanor 6 років тому

    Question says deflection and slope at B but you solved for D?

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 років тому +2

      Yea, question at the start should read slope and deflection at D. Thanks

  • @kkkkkkk-dl3qd
    @kkkkkkk-dl3qd 2 роки тому

    B or D? Im confused

  • @SURYA4407
    @SURYA4407 2 роки тому

    How to solve a fixed beam by conjugate beam method

  • @vhk26
    @vhk26 7 років тому

    Great!