I understand what he is saying. And I'm saying actually there is something special about it. There's a lot that's special about it. Beginning with the fact that no other living species on this planet has ever thought about cladograms. No, where we put ourselves on a diagram ultimately doesn't mean anything. But the fact that we are putting ourselves on diagrams relative to anything else...that means a lot. That is special.
I tried and followed the instructions, on cox1 (earthworm), however, the FASTA, didnt show any DNA bases. Hope you'll consider making another vids thank you
Curious how the dna sequencing knows where the first letter in the dna strand starts. There obviously has to be some consistent way of knowing where the strand starts so that you can properly align two strands during comparison. If you compare the dna from identical twins, the letters would match exactly with just minor differences due to mutations. But if you shift the dna from one twin to the right or left, the comparison fails. So how is it determined where the starting sequence is located?
Ahh... fantastic video; given the current Corona event, the nextstrain.org/ncov/global website shows the great cladogram of the NCOV virus (man, is that thing doing evolutionary branching/searching or what!) and if you hover your mouse over each dot in the family tree, nextstrain shows the "DIVERGENCE" metric for that dot. Qeustion: is the DIVERGENCE metric really just 1 minus the nucleotide similarity metric mentioned in your video?
Thank you so much for posting this video any chance youd know if theres a significant difference in doing a SNP Blast search (other than going into nucleotide blast)?
On the secod website (blast), the options for database have changed, there is no "others" option, and there is a new category titles "organism. Not sure how to proceed
This video describes exactly what I have been looking for, thank you so much. Questions: Why do some of the letters appear in lower case? Why do some listings say predicted in front of them?
How do you compare (random generated) sequences from 1000 sized bp with a GC content at 0.50 (which will give you half G+C and half A+T) I can always put it on a rebsite and compare the compare the finger prints much easier, I'm not to bright with this if it makes any sense please explain
So I've got Just one question: How this comparising works for whole genomes which aren't the same length and Just like with mus musculus, there are gaps in genomes? Does it consider this as differences like with A -> C or so?
Every time I suffer through my biology class with my eyes glazing over, I just sit there and think, "Yeah, let's get through this so I can just go home and check out Mr. Anderson's video."
Thank you for your constructive you tube video teaching. i have got idea about DNA sequences. i want to ask question on SNp, plink application and how to use this sowftware
Am I the only one who put the circle (B) before the oval (C)? I feel that the circle must been there longer as it is the one that was able to include the oval into the it's components. Almost like the mitochondria and the human cell. Is this making any sense to anyone else?
Sir, I want to learn how to compare the multi sequence of spike protein of covid 19 with reference sequence. How I can compare?may I get your tutorial.. .
I just blast for the first time I have sequence ... I must tell my senior colleague that the sequence i want to buy for the RT-PCR in my hospital is not cross with other bacteria. I already blast ... But i don't know how to interprete the table. How much Query coverage that indicate the cross? How much max ident that indicate the cross.? If it reveal the significant cross with other bacteria. I will change to other appropriate sequence
Respected sir, how can i get my a lot of fish taxonomic tree relationship with others...as like u add human actin n gets its tree relationship....i have almost 50 identified fishes and i want to construct a phylogenetic tree of these fishes...how it is possible?
0.o the monsters are back! I thought I escaped them back in cladograms! this is as freaking scary as when the dragonfly ate the fish! (anderson's quote: 'well...thats disturbing")
Doesn't the fact that you, rather than a loris, are the one actually making this video on a computer to distribute over the internet seem to suggest that the idea of homo sapiens being somewhat further along than lorises in evolutionary terms seem not quite as silly as you suggest? No other species on earth has developed and demonstrated our particular emergent abilities. Not by a longshot.
Who is going to build the cage and put me in it? Who is going to even come up with the idea? The reality is: it won't be the bears. And the reality is: WE do have the appendages AND the language to do it. But let's just accept your premise and put me in a cage full of bears and let them rip me to shreds. As a homo sapien I am still a more successful, intelligent, highly adapted and adaptable creature. One person's bad day at the zoo doesn't change that.
I just realized that if I have invested my time in biogenetics instead of games, movies and other stuff, by now I would be editing my own DNA with CRISPR to extend my life or something...
Folks - time to read peer reviewed study by Dr David Thaler Uni of Basel Switzerland... you might want to rethink your stance on "survival" based evolutionary advancement theory between the species.
DNA can determine relatedness between people because genetic information is passed down from parents to offspring. So if 2 people are closely related to each other their genomes will be more similar to each other than 2 strangers' genomes. There is no genetic information being passed between species so to infer relatedness based upon genomic similarities is erroneous, illogical, and fallacious reasoning. So genetic testing doesn't tell us how closely 2 species are related to each other.
Find me a bear anywhere on this planet tonight who is arguing with another bear (that they can't even see, smell, or hear) about who is intellectually superior, bears or humans. I'll bet you can't do it, because they can't do it.
"That is silly. if a loris giving podcast on you tube..it would put itself in a higher form and then compare it to the others" human will be the lowest form..haha
It's incredible that a 10 minutes video explains better this topic than a class of a Maestry in Biotechnology. Thank you for the video :)
True that
So far the best tutorial that I came across on DNA sequence analysis...Thank you...
Just finished the playlist. 'Life of a procrastinator.'
ha. I just watched the whole playlist too for the AP tomorrow morning. I had the videos going double speed because I didn't have enough time
what playlist
You are such a wonderful teacher and you deserve so many views! Thanks for all your wonderful lessons!
Thank you! You helped me understand this a lot better and I can finally do my homework!
I understand what he is saying.
And I'm saying actually there is something special about it. There's a lot that's special about it. Beginning with the fact that no other living species on this planet has ever thought about cladograms.
No, where we put ourselves on a diagram ultimately doesn't mean anything. But the fact that we are putting ourselves on diagrams relative to anything else...that means a lot. That is special.
you are a great teacher, very helpful as always! thank you!
I was trying to find an informative easy to get explanation. This was perfect!! Thanks now I'm addicted!
You've saved my project!! You sir, are a life saver!
OMG finally a video that is TRULY understandable !! Thank you soo much!
Just curious Bozeman, what benefit do you make from making IP puller links. Do you sell this data? I’m curious because lots of youtubers do this.
Best teacher, it really helped me in my molecular phylogenetic class!
This is an incredibly helpful and well explained video
I tried and followed the instructions, on cox1 (earthworm), however, the FASTA, didnt show any DNA bases. Hope you'll consider making another vids thank you
you explain with such clarity
Curious how the dna sequencing knows where the first letter in the dna strand starts. There obviously has to be some consistent way of knowing where the strand starts so that you can properly align two strands during comparison. If you compare the dna from identical twins, the letters would match exactly with just minor differences due to mutations. But if you shift the dna from one twin to the right or left, the comparison fails. So how is it determined where the starting sequence is located?
This made things a lot easier for me
Ahh... fantastic video; given the current Corona event, the nextstrain.org/ncov/global website shows the great cladogram of the NCOV virus (man, is that thing doing evolutionary branching/searching or what!) and if you hover your mouse over each dot in the family tree, nextstrain shows the "DIVERGENCE" metric for that dot. Qeustion: is the DIVERGENCE metric really just 1 minus the nucleotide similarity metric mentioned in your video?
you are such a great teacher i admire your work you have describe blast as a video game
Thank you so much for posting this video any chance youd know if theres a significant difference in doing a SNP Blast search (other than going into nucleotide blast)?
Thank you so much for this video. It really demystify a lot of confusion.
On the secod website (blast), the options for database have changed, there is no "others" option, and there is a new category titles "organism. Not sure how to proceed
A big thank you from France! :)
Thank u so much for the very well explanation
i watched all your bio videos and your are outstanding!!! now to watch the chem videos
This video describes exactly what I have been looking for, thank you so much. Questions: Why do some of the letters appear in lower case? Why do some listings say predicted in front of them?
How do you compare (random generated) sequences from 1000 sized bp with a GC content at 0.50 (which will give you half G+C and half A+T) I can always put it on a rebsite and compare the compare the finger prints much easier, I'm not to bright with this if it makes any sense please explain
I love you sir you just made my life look so easy
Thanks this really helps my science fair
So I've got Just one question: How this comparising works for whole genomes which aren't the same length and Just like with mus musculus, there are gaps in genomes? Does it consider this as differences like with A -> C or so?
Refers to relationship between humans and pandas at the start.
Randomly selects a taxonomy near the end and it's a... panda.
Mind. Blown.
Thank you very much... you are a great teacher ! thanks for saving 100 of hours ! thank you very much..!
Every time I suffer through my biology class with my eyes glazing over, I just sit there and think, "Yeah, let's get through this so I can just go home and check out Mr. Anderson's video."
Thank you for your constructive you tube video teaching. i have got idea about DNA sequences. i want to ask question on SNp, plink application and how to use this sowftware
Am I the only one who put the circle (B) before the oval (C)? I feel that the circle must been there longer as it is the one that was able to include the oval into the it's components. Almost like the mitochondria and the human cell. Is this making any sense to anyone else?
Such a useful video! Thanks a lot!!!!
Excellent ....helpful a lot
Thank you, that was amazingly well explained!!
Sir, I want to learn how to compare the multi sequence of spike protein of covid 19 with reference sequence. How I can compare?may I get your tutorial.. .
Thanks so much, really great tutorial!
Why does the title says "transcript variant 2 mRNA" , even though it is a DNA sequence? It is confusing.
Thank you so much! You are the best.
Thank you for a very good explanation
could u do a video on triglycerides it would really help.... if u did can i have directions on hw to find it?..ty in advance
thank you steve kerr
wow!.......really clear....congrats!!! subscribed =)
this should have more views.
That was really helpful! Thanks
I just blast for the first time
I have sequence ... I must tell my senior colleague that the sequence i want to buy for the RT-PCR in my hospital is not cross with other bacteria. I already blast ... But i don't know how to interprete the table. How much Query coverage that indicate the cross? How much max ident that indicate the cross.? If it reveal the significant cross with other bacteria. I will change to other appropriate sequence
Respected sir, how can i get my a lot of fish taxonomic tree relationship with others...as like u add human actin n gets its tree relationship....i have almost 50 identified fishes and i want to construct a phylogenetic tree of these fishes...how it is possible?
where's Mr.Anderson in 2021?
Very informative!
Woool .. that is videos was amazing.
thanks
Blast Processing with the Sega genesis.
Thank you, Sir
What does Query Coverage mean?
thanks much sir nice explanation
Loved the video
Thank you
0.o the monsters are back! I thought I escaped them back in cladograms! this is as freaking scary as when the dragonfly ate the fish! (anderson's quote: 'well...thats disturbing")
I like how this video is exactly 10 minutes....or mabye I should be paying attention to the video?
Thank you, u make my life much easier
@belaghoulashi all he's saying is that there's nothing special about humans being on the left of the cladogram.
Bonjour!
great video!!!!!
why do i feel like he's my biology teacher dad?
Shout out to Macdaddy.
Doesn't the fact that you, rather than a loris, are the one actually making this video on a computer to distribute over the internet seem to suggest that the idea of homo sapiens being somewhat further along than lorises in evolutionary terms seem not quite as silly as you suggest?
No other species on earth has developed and demonstrated our particular emergent abilities. Not by a longshot.
thank you so much
PogU for high quality mic
Who is going to build the cage and put me in it? Who is going to even come up with the idea?
The reality is: it won't be the bears. And the reality is: WE do have the appendages AND the language to do it.
But let's just accept your premise and put me in a cage full of bears and let them rip me to shreds. As a homo sapien I am still a more successful, intelligent, highly adapted and adaptable creature. One person's bad day at the zoo doesn't change that.
who's watching in 2019
I just realized that if I have invested my time in biogenetics instead of games, movies and other stuff, by now I would be editing my own DNA with CRISPR to extend my life or something...
Folks - time to read peer reviewed study by Dr David Thaler Uni of Basel Switzerland...
you might want to rethink your stance on "survival" based evolutionary advancement theory between the species.
YOUR AMAZING !!!!!!
Hello guys.
DNA can determine relatedness between people because genetic information is passed down from parents to offspring. So if 2 people are closely related to each other their genomes will be more similar to each other than 2 strangers' genomes. There is no genetic information being passed between species so to infer relatedness based upon genomic similarities is erroneous, illogical, and fallacious reasoning. So genetic testing doesn't tell us how closely 2 species are related to each other.
Very Cool
God bless you
you are a fuc**** genius!!
You're missing the point. Our brains are more advanced than (other) animals. All animals have their own advanced features.
Sorry I mean right
its 200 hits by now
Anyone here because Alan Rockefeller lmao
Find me a bear anywhere on this planet tonight who is arguing with another bear (that they can't even see, smell, or hear) about who is intellectually superior, bears or humans.
I'll bet you can't do it, because they can't do it.
Hello guys at Leicester college lolololol
lol, the mRNA has thymine
Who else got here from a Google search
whhahaa
busdriver hitting woman
"That is silly. if a loris giving podcast on you tube..it would put itself in a higher form and then compare it to the others" human will be the lowest form..haha