Piers could be the worst person to ever have a conversation with, ever. Asks you a question, and two words into your answer, he coming up with his own conclusion of what he thinks you mean and then jumps to another talking point. He might be worse than flat Earthers.
Yeah he has his conclusion predetermined, regardless of what anyone says. Also dead kids is not an argument and Adam Lanza 110lb ass couldn’t have lugged all that equipment let alone being accurate with it.
It's actually insane lol. It's like he's an A.I that simply has inputs and outputs. When he hears a certain phrase, he loads up a prerecorded response. Over and over and over again lol
@@coltino99 whenever Anthony brought up gang violence which has killed more in a year than mass shootings have in the last 2 decades pierce completely threw out his argument lol people just can’t accept that mass shootings account for a tiny percentage of gun deathsZ but ya know people let emotion take control instead of logic
'When considering gun controls, a nation must first acknowledge that this world is, by definition, broken. It’s a given evil will erupt from time to time, no matter what anyone does to prevent it. It’s just where and when it will happen that is most often unforeseeable.'
It's infuriating listening to this limey call it an assault weapon repeatedly and they don't stop him because they don't even know what it means. An assault weapon by definition has to be capable of select fire. Most civilians don't own fully automatic rifles and there's never been a mass shooting committed with one. It's a totally moot point
I think the line should be drawn when you can spray bullets on a crowd, no matter what the mechanism of the gun. Weeding out the crazies is a dream because pretty much every person is on some sort of psychiatric medication. The real problem , though, is not guns, but breakdown of families, death of God and just an overall decline of American society.
@@sca8217 couldn't agree more. In the 50s you could order a gun from your home and have it shipped directly to your house. Mass shootings were very rare at that time yet guns were more accessible than they are today. Something changed and it wasn't the availability of firearms
I'm surprised anthony did bring that up. He's a gun nut but I guess he didn't learn the basics about the idiotic debate about gun control. Also check out Paul Harrell of you've got the spare time he's a very knowledgeable and professional gun owner.
@@frankfurt564 If you want an example from the present day, Switzerland has a high level of gun ownership but a very low murder rate and you never hear of American style mass shootings happening there. That raises the question why is this the case?
"But shouldn't we look into studies at least" Yea... they have... they have said over and over again that there is no correlation... yet he still brings it up.
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to bear arms, shall not be infringed. How is that hard to comprehend. 'The right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.' Even before the supreme court decided on the matter it was always generally accepted that any citizen who isn't a criminal can own firearms in America. And Piers has the audacity to say that the NRA "hijacked" the meaning. Not true at all. Even in Canada any sane, non-violent person with no criminal record can obtain a firearms licence. Issued on a 'Shall-Issue' basis.
The violent video games Piers keeps saying Lanza was playing was a total lie. His favorite game was Dance Dance Revolution. I don't think anyone normal person is gonna get psychotic after playing that
"You think that is true? This is the problem with the gun debate in America" ... The problem with the debate is that people bring up accurate stats? It is a problem that, instead of fear mongering, people use the actual numbers?
@4:00 after jimmy makes a good point and Morgan just walks over it and goes to video games, Patrice O’Neal woulda called that shit out. I can hear it now, “nigga, wtf does that have to do with the point jimmy made” his white person deflection detection woulda rang
@@theguywhoisaustralian1465 that's because you're an easily triggered lib who can't read and understand sentence formation and most likely have a microscopic p#nis to go with it.
When the constitution was written civilians had more advanced firearms than the military. Civilians had rifles and the military had smooth bore muskets
Ant brings up Afghanistan as having a high number of guns. He should have compared other first world countries. Norway and Switzerland both have fairly high percentage of gun ownership (less than USA but still quite a lot) but they both have some of the lowest murder rates in the world. The number of guns by itself clearly isn't the issue.
Is anyone going to mention how easy it is to rob a British Man 😂? Seriously tho, we have arms coming over the border (fast and furious) and criminals don’t obey laws, so Yes Pierce, we need to protect ourselves.
So... by Piers's logic... People should be riding bicycles and automobiles should be reserved for law enforcement because of drunk drivers killing innocent people.
Piers countered ants point about weeding out crazy people from the rest by pointing out that we don't even allow for background checks, which would help weed out the crazies from the rest. That was a microcosm of this whole segment. Ant and those like him are selective when it comes to the information they believe, and completely illogical and hypocritical.
The mental gymnastics you people have to perform in order to make your own decrepit, fanciful misconceptions and outright lies for your agenda to become the twisted truth is absolutely astounding. Believing the lies you are told to believe is incredibly easy when it's your part and parcel. Practice, practice, practice makes perfect. You're a trained, world-class athlete in the art of deception, bullshit, and outright lies. It allows you to focus on what's important. What really matters to your lot consists of Idolizing a junkie who beats up and pistol whips pregnant women and engages in counterfeiting all the while referring to his wretched, vile existence as "holy" and "Christian". Electing a serial rapist to the highest office in the land. 3 years earlier he was PNG. Now he's your undeveloped-breast-grappling Molester-In-Chief slipping into pants shitting senility. Sending your young children to be groomed and subsequently daddy stitched in their broken asshole by degenerate Drag Queens. You send them in like lambs to the slaughter. A fine legacy you lead. Very fine indeed.
No, not really. Piers Morgan doesn't even know what an assault weapon is. He never specified how they're becoming more deadly over time. He never addressed the horrific violence in his home country.
@@SugaryCoyote If your leading point is that Piers doesn't know what an assault weapon is, your argument is DOA. Are you one of those guys who argue at parties saying "BRO DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT AR STANDS FOR?!"
@@orange555 No, it's the exact opposite. If he doesn't even know what one is, then everything else he says about them can be ignored. He doesn't deserve an argument. Our rights are non-negotiable.
@@fishrenfroeboyd7954 He literally did. Every time he’s presented with some indefensible statistic regarding the US firearm homicide rate he pivots to “but it’s not the root cause of the issue”. It is the root cause. The argument isn’t what is the root cause of violence. The argument is what causes violent people to be able to be as effective as possible killing people. The example Piers gave with the man who went on a stabbing rampage and killed not even a single child compared to Sandy hook was a good example. All Anthony ever does is just deflect and not acknowledge the point made. He doesn’t even believe his own arguments, he just likes having guns, period, which is fine, but just be up front about it, don’t come up with fraudulent stats.
![Zarchivo [Opie & Anthony Episodes]](http://yt3.ggpht.com/ytc/AIdro_l4ct2HDZ4rNKcZvuE7OrStQNKHe5jRyOrn49IEVRMel5w=s48-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj)
Piers-“have you fired an ar15?”
Anthony-“sure, I have 4 of them”
Jimmy-“… he also drinks heavily” 😂😂😂
that's that subtle genius
Piers could be the worst person to ever have a conversation with, ever. Asks you a question, and two words into your answer, he coming up with his own conclusion of what he thinks you mean and then jumps to another talking point.
He might be worse than flat Earthers.
...nobody is worse than the flat earthers except for maybe anti-abortion people who think a woman who was raped should have to have the baby
Yeah he has his conclusion predetermined, regardless of what anyone says. Also dead kids is not an argument and Adam Lanza 110lb ass couldn’t have lugged all that equipment let alone being accurate with it.
Idk I think it's flat but think of the inside of a snow globe
From my cold dead hands..
I love this one. Pier's debating tactics are incredibly annoying and I love how riled up cumia gets at times.
"So you don't care about the dead children" so fucking annoying
It's actually insane lol. It's like he's an A.I that simply has inputs and outputs. When he hears a certain phrase, he loads up a prerecorded response. Over and over and over again lol
You mean making great points that can’t be argued?
@@coltino99 not at all.
@@coltino99 whenever Anthony brought up gang violence which has killed more in a year than mass shootings have in the last 2 decades pierce completely threw out his argument lol people just can’t accept that mass shootings account for a tiny percentage of gun deathsZ but ya know people let emotion take control instead of logic
Piers is a goo gobbler
Solid Nick Dipaolo reference
Yeah, you're right Piers. Let the government be the only ones with assault rifles cuz we all trust the government, don't we?
You sound just like Anthony... Dumb!
Of course, no government has ever turned on it's citizens.
@@markrobertson2052 no, never
I trust then enough to not do a drive by on me
After Uvalde they can't really make this argument anymore lol
Lmao you know you're losing the argument when ANTHONY CUMIA makes a good point about defending the young black men in inner cities
I am not a gun guy at all, but Piers is a dirty debater. His tactics are obvious and infuriating.
he's a great debater for content. not a fair debater but still effective
@@davemanning4005 he's effective in a lot of areas but not here. He's using the same strawman arguments gun control weirdos use.
'When considering gun controls, a nation must first acknowledge that this world is, by definition, broken. It’s a given evil will erupt from time to time, no matter what anyone does to prevent it. It’s just where and when it will happen that is most often unforeseeable.'
Translation: "people are going to die anyway, so who cares?"
It's infuriating listening to this limey call it an assault weapon repeatedly and they don't stop him because they don't even know what it means. An assault weapon by definition has to be capable of select fire. Most civilians don't own fully automatic rifles and there's never been a mass shooting committed with one. It's a totally moot point
I think the line should be drawn when you can spray bullets on a crowd, no matter what the mechanism of the gun. Weeding out the crazies is a dream because pretty much every person is on some sort of psychiatric medication. The real problem , though, is not guns, but breakdown of families, death of God and just an overall decline of American society.
@@sca8217 couldn't agree more. In the 50s you could order a gun from your home and have it shipped directly to your house. Mass shootings were very rare at that time yet guns were more accessible than they are today. Something changed and it wasn't the availability of firearms
I'm surprised anthony did bring that up. He's a gun nut but I guess he didn't learn the basics about the idiotic debate about gun control. Also check out Paul Harrell of you've got the spare time he's a very knowledgeable and professional gun owner.
@@frankfurt564 If you want an example from the present day, Switzerland has a high level of gun ownership but a very low murder rate and you never hear of American style mass shootings happening there. That raises the question why is this the case?
5:19 The one time opie’s “hold on HOLD ONNN” came in handy
Love Ant arguing
Bonnie and Clyde, Jack the ripper, Hitler, h.h. Holmes, 911 terriorist, hundreds of other shitheads, none of these people played violent video games.
"But shouldn't we look into studies at least" Yea... they have... they have said over and over again that there is no correlation... yet he still brings it up.
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to bear arms, shall not be infringed.
How is that hard to comprehend. 'The right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.'
Even before the supreme court decided on the matter it was always generally accepted that any citizen who isn't a criminal can own firearms in America.
And Piers has the audacity to say that the NRA "hijacked" the meaning. Not true at all.
Even in Canada any sane, non-violent person with no criminal record can obtain a firearms licence. Issued on a 'Shall-Issue' basis.
Shall not be infringed
Curious, where would you draw the line on what American citizens, can and cannot purchase as far as firearms go?
Piers has come around a bit since this
Anthony is 100& correct on his facts. 👏 👏 👏
I've never played mario then gone out and jumped on turtles
Liar
The violent video games Piers keeps saying Lanza was playing was a total lie. His favorite game was Dance Dance Revolution. I don't think anyone normal person is gonna get psychotic after playing that
"You think that is true? This is the problem with the gun debate in America" ... The problem with the debate is that people bring up accurate stats? It is a problem that, instead of fear mongering, people use the actual numbers?
I wish piers would get caught up in one of those malls he keeps mentioning
Omfg Piers let Anthony talk for christ sake man
@4:00 after jimmy makes a good point and Morgan just walks over it and goes to video games, Patrice O’Neal woulda called that shit out. I can hear it now, “nigga, wtf does that have to do with the point jimmy made” his white person deflection detection woulda rang
SHALL...NOT...BE...INFRINGED!
Well regulated militia!!
You okay bud?
@@theguywhoisaustralian1465 Better than ever. You must not be if that bothered you.
@@bodhi9180 THE...
ONLY.....THING....THAT BOTHERED....ME....WAS....YOUR.....CHOICE.....OF......FORMAT.....FOR.....YOUR....COMMENT.....SEE....HOW....STUPID...IT...IS?
@@theguywhoisaustralian1465 that's because you're an easily triggered lib who can't read and understand sentence formation and most likely have a microscopic p#nis to go with it.
Decent debate, a little heart stringy and cheap but decent. Bottom line this Limey will never fucking get it.
When the constitution was written civilians had more advanced firearms than the military. Civilians had rifles and the military had smooth bore muskets
You gotta love a British foreigner telling us what the founding fathers were thinking
I love it when a fellow American tells me we are a christian nation...
Opie: B.... Wh.... A.... H..... Sh.....Bu...
he should be mad about all those government oversight regulations instead of wanting to add more!
Piers should take a history refresh course of what happens when ur unarmed against government upheavel!
This was before piers got fired from CNN. Ben shapiro also debated him. Piers was trash then, he's trash now.
Ant brings up Afghanistan as having a high number of guns. He should have compared other first world countries. Norway and Switzerland both have fairly high percentage of gun ownership (less than USA but still quite a lot) but they both have some of the lowest murder rates in the world. The number of guns by itself clearly isn't the issue.
13& of population is responsible for approximately 50 of us arrests
Don’t ever say their names.. ever.. that’ll help stop these maniacal shooters
I’m on Anthonys side but I’ve never heard a worse debater in my life
My only problem with this is Anthony not calling out the bullshit term assault rifle. There is no definition for assault rifle.
So you don’t have a problem with Antony getting schooled by the biggest wanker on earth? Take your head for a wobble son
It's assault weapon that doesn't have a correct definition.
@@b.a.6251 Any assault weapon doesn't have a legitimate definition. They just use the word assault as a dog whistle.
@@robertmagill6005 assault rifle has a legitimate definition ask any veteran. Assault weapon is the made up term
Somebody could assault somebody with a ball peen hammer
Is anyone going to mention how easy it is to rob a British Man 😂? Seriously tho, we have arms coming over the border (fast and furious) and criminals don’t obey laws, so Yes Pierce, we need to protect ourselves.
I am not a Piers Morgan fan ... but he is winning this discussion on all points!!!!!
Absolutely not
So... by Piers's logic...
People should be riding bicycles and automobiles should be reserved for law enforcement because of drunk drivers killing innocent people.
Everytime Morgan makes a good point, Anthony changes the topic.
Are you crazy?
Lol
It's literally the opposite
@@jordanjohnson1244 oh yeah? he keeps bringing up black on black crime. He’s trying to shift focus
Piers countered ants point about weeding out crazy people from the rest by pointing out that we don't even allow for background checks, which would help weed out the crazies from the rest. That was a microcosm of this whole segment. Ant and those like him are selective when it comes to the information they believe, and completely illogical and hypocritical.
In fact, ant got MURDERED in this argument
The mental gymnastics you people have to perform in order to make your own decrepit, fanciful misconceptions and outright lies for your agenda to become the twisted truth is absolutely astounding. Believing the lies you are told to believe is incredibly easy when it's your part and parcel. Practice, practice, practice makes perfect.
You're a trained, world-class athlete in the art of deception, bullshit, and outright lies. It allows you to focus on what's important.
What really matters to your lot consists of Idolizing a junkie who beats up and pistol whips pregnant women and engages in counterfeiting all the while referring to his wretched, vile existence as "holy" and "Christian".
Electing a serial rapist to the highest office in the land. 3 years earlier he was PNG. Now he's your undeveloped-breast-grappling Molester-In-Chief slipping into pants shitting senility.
Sending your young children to be groomed and subsequently daddy stitched in their broken asshole by degenerate Drag Queens. You send them in like lambs to the slaughter.
A fine legacy you lead. Very fine indeed.
If logic is your thing, Piers owned Cumia here.
No, not really. Piers Morgan doesn't even know what an assault weapon is. He never specified how they're becoming more deadly over time. He never addressed the horrific violence in his home country.
@@SugaryCoyote If your leading point is that Piers doesn't know what an assault weapon is, your argument is DOA. Are you one of those guys who argue at parties saying "BRO DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT AR STANDS FOR?!"
@@orange555 No, it's the exact opposite. If he doesn't even know what one is, then everything else he says about them can be ignored.
He doesn't deserve an argument. Our rights are non-negotiable.
@@SugaryCoyote I'm not going to argue with stupid. Have a great day!
@@orange555 the 2nd ammendment isn't a fucking suggestion.
Ant got his ass handed to him here…
Only not
@@fishrenfroeboyd7954 He literally did. Every time he’s presented with some indefensible statistic regarding the US firearm homicide rate he pivots to “but it’s not the root cause of the issue”.
It is the root cause. The argument isn’t what is the root cause of violence. The argument is what causes violent people to be able to be as effective as possible killing people. The example Piers gave with the man who went on a stabbing rampage and killed not even a single child compared to Sandy hook was a good example. All Anthony ever does is just deflect and not acknowledge the point made. He doesn’t even believe his own arguments, he just likes having guns, period, which is fine, but just be up front about it, don’t come up with fraudulent stats.
Nope
Love Ant, and am pro 2A.. but piers got his ass
What point did he make that was better?
I will say that piers has had this argument many times and he is well-prepared. He's very shrewd and slimey
Ant couldn’t have been more wrong it’s hilarious lol
If that’s what you want piers, you should go to the hood and preach non-violence😂 like anyone would listen to him 💥 💥 💥 🔫 🪦
Patrice O'Neal is the GOAT and Dave Chappelle, Colin Quinn, Corey Holcomb & all fefail comedians are the WOAT's😂😂😂😂