MCC LAW 31.7 EXPLAINED:SHAN MASOOD'S HITWICKET AND RUNOUT NOT OUT🤨🏏📜🔍 | VANCHI

In this video, we dive into the controversial moment during the Yorkshire vs Lancashire match where Shan Masood was involved in a hitwicket runout but was not given out. We will break down MCC Law 31.7 and explain why this decision was made. This video is perfect for cricket enthusiasts looking to understand the nuances of cricket laws and how they are applied in real game situations. Don't forget to like, share, and subscribe for more detailed cricket analysis!

[@pahadibackbenchers3367]

Also watch the 2015 World Cup match, England vs Australia, in which the umpire gives the best man LPU out, because if the umpire has given him out, then the ball should have been declared, but the Australian fielder gives him a run out by hitting the ball on the wicket, now because the umpire had already given him out, the player reviews it for the third umpire and LPU, the third umpire gives him not out, but the umpire later gives the player a run out, but the thing to understand in the match is that if the umpire gives him out once and someone runs him out after that, will that be valid? The out was given to James Anderson and he was playing James Taylor with him

[@pahadibackbenchers3367]

Umpiring error leaves James Taylor stranded on 98 not-out against Australia at ICC World Cup 2015

[@brokennosecuttinh]

Amazing keep it coming brotha

[@owaisaliyt1403]

Great brother

[@omdound7631]

Hello vanchi,
If there is a runout on a no ball will ball be counted in an over????

[@vanchi_._]

no

[@Animetuber09]

Good decision