@@ps3301 yeah but nodes are decided years in advance so you can reserve capacity. Lunar Lake was scheduled on TSMC while they were still working on Intel 3. Now they’re shipping Xeon 6 on Intel 3. Therefore they’re not behind, they were simply hedging their bets.
Sadly, Intel sold the SSD part of the business to SK Hynix and is now branded as Solidigm (they still have many of the great Intel folk from that team though and they're still doing great stuff). Intel also shuttered the "RAM" (3D-XPoint or "Optane") side of the business a couple years ago. On the plus side, Intel has expanded their GPU portfolio to include discrete graphics now with Intel Arc. The Xe architecture made for Intel Arc has made its way into the integrated graphics which has resulted in massive performance gains.
If so much grandiloquence was reflected in a value of the shares that is not half of amd or a thousandth of nvda...And if the value of the 4Tb were not so high that they did not justify buying new PCs.
Intel's Skymont architecture is very INTresting - ua-cam.com/video/gu7Fvj0eHJk/v-deo.htmlsi=3EJZM-X25sGGVkop - Lunar Lake looks solid in mobile processors and Arrow Lake Core Ultra 200 series, apparently will have same core counts as Raptor Lake Refresh (14900 LGA 1700), but fewer threads with 13 alleged SKUs in the works. The Core Ultra 200 K series (125W) and non-K series (65W) lineup reportedly feature three models each. There's a possibility that the non-K counterparts may have different model numbers, unlike in the past, when Intel just dropped the 'K' suffix from the model name. Meanwhile, the Core Ultra 200 F series (125W and 65W) and Core Ultra 200 T series check in with two and five SKUs, respectively.
Why? P cores are less efficient and only there to deliver fast single-thread performance (which is why a few P cores should be enough. There is no need for many fast single threads). If you want more multicore performance, scaling should be done with more E cores.
@@livedreamsgLunar Lake is not meant to compete with the PRO and MAX chips from Apple. Arrow Lake is meant for that at the expense of less efficiency. Panther Lake will offer both performance and efficiency from ultrabooks to desktops.
@@livedreamsg if you can wait that will be wise. I upgrade every 5 years unless something really cutting edge comes. If I had an M3 Max MacBook Pro I'd wait. Panther Lake according to latest rumours will have upto 16 CPU Cores and 12 Celestial Xe3 GPU Cores.
@@adaml.5355 The same way AMD has an Arm based SoC on the way. x86 is a dying outdated architecture. Once nVidia release their efficient powerful Arm based SoC for Windows, it’s a wrap for Intel who has all their chips on x86.
@@B.Ch3rry Instruction set doesn't matter. The design of the CPU core matters. The design of all the other IP on the chip matters. And the cache and power management matters. Also, Qualcomm isn't using ARM-based SOC. Qualcomm made a core called Oryon that uses the ARM instruction set. There is a difference. Oryon barely beats current AMD or Intel efficiency and the rest of the IP such as the GPU is terrible.
Chipzilla is Back baby.
They are back by using tsmc 3nm node
@@ps3301 yeah but nodes are decided years in advance so you can reserve capacity.
Lunar Lake was scheduled on TSMC while they were still working on Intel 3. Now they’re shipping Xeon 6 on Intel 3.
Therefore they’re not behind, they were simply hedging their bets.
New Intel processors for machine learning and artificial intelligence. New generation is here.
this should aggressively compete with apple macs !
Thanks Steve!
Intel is back with vengeance !
I want laptop made by intel and have intel logo, ram intel, ssd intel, also gpu is intel intergrated
Sadly, Intel sold the SSD part of the business to SK Hynix and is now branded as Solidigm (they still have many of the great Intel folk from that team though and they're still doing great stuff). Intel also shuttered the "RAM" (3D-XPoint or "Optane") side of the business a couple years ago.
On the plus side, Intel has expanded their GPU portfolio to include discrete graphics now with Intel Arc. The Xe architecture made for Intel Arc has made its way into the integrated graphics which has resulted in massive performance gains.
If so much grandiloquence was reflected in a value of the shares that is not half of amd or a thousandth of nvda...And if the value of the 4Tb were not so high that they did not justify buying new PCs.
🥰🥰🥰🥰
10
remove the NPU and you can get 4 more Skymont cores
Just make it around 70-80k in india
1
11:57 WHEN I HEARD INDIA AND BRAZIL
000
33333333
Stop acting criminal and recall all 13th and 14th gen i9 processors.
PC would be better without Microsoft.
Intel's Skymont architecture is very INTresting - ua-cam.com/video/gu7Fvj0eHJk/v-deo.htmlsi=3EJZM-X25sGGVkop - Lunar Lake looks solid in mobile processors and Arrow Lake Core Ultra 200 series, apparently will have same core counts as Raptor Lake Refresh (14900 LGA 1700), but fewer threads with 13 alleged SKUs in the works. The Core Ultra 200 K series (125W) and non-K series (65W) lineup reportedly feature three models each. There's a possibility that the non-K counterparts may have different model numbers, unlike in the past, when Intel just dropped the 'K' suffix from the model name. Meanwhile, the Core Ultra 200 F series (125W and 65W) and Core Ultra 200 T series check in with two and five SKUs, respectively.
Intel is back to be the leader. Finally
Intel > Everyone else!!!
Intel's back baby!
Intel > Everything else!
INTEL ON TOP BI___
Would love this power efficiency with 4-8 more P cores.
Why? P cores are less efficient and only there to deliver fast single-thread performance (which is why a few P cores should be enough. There is no need for many fast single threads). If you want more multicore performance, scaling should be done with more E cores.
@@michaelmullerhausen8456 Why is that? My M3 Max has 12 performance cores and only 4 efficiency cores.
@@livedreamsgLunar Lake is not meant to compete with the PRO and MAX chips from Apple. Arrow Lake is meant for that at the expense of less efficiency. Panther Lake will offer both performance and efficiency from ultrabooks to desktops.
@@EnochGitongaKimathi I see. Then let me wait another year.
@@livedreamsg if you can wait that will be wise. I upgrade every 5 years unless something really cutting edge comes. If I had an M3 Max MacBook Pro I'd wait.
Panther Lake according to latest rumours will have upto 16 CPU Cores and 12 Celestial Xe3 GPU Cores.
just when i was about to move to AMD for the 9950x bye bye amd
0 T
0000
1
How many did they say AI
Please diversify and invest in Arm architecture as well...
Why would they ever invest in their competitors?
@@adaml.5355
The same way AMD has an Arm based SoC on the way. x86 is a dying outdated architecture. Once nVidia release their efficient powerful Arm based SoC for Windows, it’s a wrap for Intel who has all their chips on x86.
@@B.Ch3rry Instruction set doesn't matter. The design of the CPU core matters. The design of all the other IP on the chip matters. And the cache and power management matters.
Also, Qualcomm isn't using ARM-based SOC. Qualcomm made a core called Oryon that uses the ARM instruction set. There is a difference.
Oryon barely beats current AMD or Intel efficiency and the rest of the IP such as the GPU is terrible.
So sad no more stagnation 4 core 4 thread 😂. Do your chip better or get bankrupt.