It's not understanding, it's rejecting understanding in favor of acceptance. That's why so many stay muslim even in the 21th century. The proper understanding of islam is that it's man-made.
Biarkan aja. Nanti antum dilabeli wahabi sama mereka. Saya sudah coba menunjukkan bukti2 pake ayat Al Quran malah dianggap siapa saya koq langsung menafsirkan Al Quran seenak saya. Dan mendaratkan label wahabi. Biarkan aja susah dikasitau. Mereka lebih percaya kiyainya, ustadnya daripada Quran.
Philosophy is dangerous knowledge like 2 handed sword if you lacking in akhidah you will grown astray for ever and even if you have it as times goes by it will doubt your akhidah eventually
@@menjaditaatkalo dahwah itu biar kata 1 ayat kasih tahu aja soal dia tolak itu urusan dia kita sudah mengamalkan kewajiban akan ilmu yg didapat soal di bilang apa kek terserah sih gak usah reply aja kata ustadz firanda juga gitu mirip dengan ulama ini pemahamannya
The Issue is people taking it in the literal sense, Allah doesn't literally have a human hand, as a divine exalted being, he uses these analogies for us to grasp something similar that Allah has that we cannot comprehend. The whole Quran is like imagine a grown adult whose had the highest level of studies in Science and is trying to explain it to a 5 year old [We are the 5 year olds].
@@udaramalam7348Dude, he isn't denying Allah where He doesn't have hands, but he is saying that Allah's hands is not the same as a hand of a human (or any of His creations in particular)
its important to reflect to get the depth of insight, but at the same time, when u know something is f.exp haram. U should have that kind of respect towards it that u accsept it without trying to fabriqate it@@jesan733
Yes absolutely how does Allah has these? Me: "I Don't know in a way that's of befitting his majesty, but it doesn't bother me. I just to worry about the day of judgment."
There is a reason and a wisdom why Allah and the prophets of Allah did not reveal to us details about Allah. What we know is what we know from revelation (wahi) that is it. You want to see Allah then make it to Jannah
Asalamu aleykum. I personally moved to america at the age of seven, though in five years time I had an impressive deep understanding and natural way of speaking, very american - that to the point, when I heard british english, I thought it was a different language, and I couldn't understand it. If that's how a child managed to learn a language, then an adult can do more, due to more intellect, experience, etc.
السلام عليكم ورحمه الله Imam Malik never explained 'Istawa' he simply said the word is known i.e known in the Quran . The speaker in this explained istawa by adding rising above to the statement. Look the statement up. Also Istawa has multiple meanings .The Quran also says Allah is near . So how do we take one literally and interpret another . Beware . May Allah protect us
Abdullah ibn Nafi’ reported: Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, was asked about the saying of Allah Almighty, “The Most Merciful rose above the Throne,” (20:5). The man said, “How is His rising?” Malik said, “The rising is acknowledged, its modality is unknown, and asking about it is an innovation. I see you are a man who intended evil with this question.” Source: al-Istidhkār 2/529 Ibn Abdul Barr said, “The people of the Sunnah agreed upon affirming the divine attributes as reported in the Book and the Sunnah, interpreting them as reality and not as a metaphor, except that they do not ask ‘how’ is the modality of any of that.” Source: al-‘Ulūw lil-‘Alī al-Ghaffār 1/250
Read the hadith about the slave girl after an altercation who was asked by the Prophet (peace be upon him): “Where is Allah?” She answered: “FI SAMA” (Allah is Above the Heavens) He (peace be upon him) said: “ who am i” She said; “you are the messenger of Allah” He (peace be upon him) said: “set her free! She is a believer!”
@@MK-hw2ir Also 'fi' means in not above, so this translation/interpretation is not 100 % accurate. Look it up in the oldest dictionaries. And Allah knows best
@@markward3981 in this context it does, because Allah Almighty says about Himself in the Glorious Qoran: “Allah 3ala al3arsh ISTAWA” =“Allah has RISEN OVER/ ABOVE His Throne” (in whatever way befits His Majesty) You literally can’t get any clearer than this! Erase the sickness in you heart of only acknowledging revelation only when it makes sense to your reasoning, this is what iblies did when refusing to prostrate to Adam!
@@MK-hw2ir 'When my servants ask you concerning me ...tell them I am near' , the Quran also says this . 'I am closer to you than you life vein ' the Quran says this as well.
Assalamualaikum, any explanation about these 72 group of the ummah, are they in the hell for eternity or it is temporary???? and how do we know that we are in a part of the right group over other 72 group,,, or in the other false group outside those 73 group that mentioned?
There are hadith that say believers with a mustard seed of faith will enter Jannah, and other hadith that mention the sinful believers will be purified in jahannam before being brought into jannah. So likely being in hell is temporary for a believer. But you don't want to be in hell for even 1 sec as another hadith mentioned that a man who lived the most comfortable life in the dunia was dipped into hell for a moment, and after coming out he said that he has never experienced any pleasure before before being thrown back into hell So long as you stick to the teachings of the Quran and hadith, and you do not innovate from it, insyaallah you are on the right path
Check your actions against Quran and the teachings of prophet Muhammad p.b.u.h - Sahih al Bukhari, Sahih al Muslim and other kutubi sitta. Question everything because nowadays governments won't let you to understand Islam deeply
Temporary. The hadith mentions *MY UMMAH* will split into 73 sects. This indicates that they are muslims and will not be in Hellfire for eternity. For one to count as a muslim, they should pray their obligatory prayers, and neither say any words, have any beliefs nor commit any actions that constitutes as shirk or kufr (which includes denying or disbelieving in any ayat or authentic hadith, as that makes the person a kafir). That is the bare minimum. To be clear, people from so-called sects like Qadiani are not even muslims because they say there is a prophet after Muhammad S.A.W, which is disbelief in what Allah has said in the Quran.
Shejk Assim, it is you following shaitan, cuz Allah(swt) have no body parts as you describe HIM and according to quran Allah(swt) is everywhere and not limited to place or time!
@@tegaradam5060 Yes, we can hear it. That person can not, which is what I'm stating here. Subtitles, sure. Is it accurate enough? To me it is, as I can hear it and follow along. If I couldn't hear it, would I trust Google solely for the subtitles in terms of seeking knowledge? No.
This guy is far away from god because if u tasted gods power on a regular basis u would know for sure gods powers is in everything. We as humans if u advance speritually know that we refects gods wisdom this a reality because god talks to u and gods love flows out of u. He knows god on an intelectual level but not on a real level because u cant approch god with the intellect. Amd if he knew god he would be at peace and once u rally found. The truth once u find u find religion limits development because god is bigger thatn religion so u sit and enjoy gods precence and there is no need to convince anybody about anything.
If you cant know anything about the how-ness of a thing that means you dont know anything about it. For example describe me a chicken that about it you cant answer any "how?" questions. Can you say that it has a beak without any how-ness? If you claim that it has a beak, even if you dont know its how-ness, you described it hence answered the how question. You may claim that you didnt add anything to the knowledge of the chicken because the beak you mentioned doesnt have any how-property, then why talk about the beak in the first place? Because if the beak is without how-ness, the word beak doesnt mean anything. So when they say that Allah established to the throne, while the ayah has meaning, they mean absolutely nothing. The problem occurs when they sneak in some how-ness to this statement i.e. that he is up in the sky. If you say that he is up in the sky you interpret the ayah and hence talk about the how-ness of Allah. They may say that they dont interpret the statement "Allah is in the sky" but use it anyways, we do infact know they interpret it because with this sentence they refute the Allah is everywhere statement. If you dont mean any meaning with a statement how can you refute a statement with a meaningless statement. If "Allah is up in the sky" statement is without any how-ness, without any meaning, than how can it contradict the Allah is everywhere statement? A meaningless statement cant contradict a meaningful statement. Thats because they secretly believe the literal meaning of Allah is up in the sky statement so they say: if Allah is up in the throne how can it be everywhere? If Allah meant by the word throne "space" then because the space is everywhere Allah is everywhere but we dont know and we dont even know that this statement is wrong or not. So to sum up: if they didnt truly interpret the ayah then they cant refute the statement "Allah is everywhere" because one cant refute a statement with a sentence that they dont know the meaning of. For example can you refute they statement "the earth is a Globe" with the statement "sjsnsjsdjdsksndks"? No because you dont know what it means. İf you claim that you can refute it then you indirectly say that you understand the meaning of "sjsnsjsdjdsksndks". The reason for this comes from the fact that They want to refute the claim that Allah is everywhere but if they do so with the "Allah established to the throne" ayah but in order to use this ayah they have to contradict the "nothing can resemble hım" ayah. So they switch sides depending on what they are dealing with. If they want to refute the "Allah is everywhere" statement then they give meaning to the ayah but if they are talking about the ayah itself then they claim that they dont know what it means because if they did they run the risk of describing Allah. All this effort is to refute the sufis and the shia but while they are trying this they contradict themselves. Because the salafiyah movement is infact a antithesis movement. They put nothing New to the table but they only get their power from refuting others and claiming the others unbelievers. And if you ask any further questions they say that your question is bidah. Where questions are bidah knowledge is bidah
Didn't read the whole thing, but describing something like a chicken or a human or any creation-- is different from Allah. That's the whole point of saying that we don't ask how. We can't even begin to imagine how jannah looks, yet some people try so hard asking "how" in regards to Allah. The bottom line is that we take the verses from the Quran and ahadith at face value, with the standard interpretation, *unless there is a given reason as to why we should take it as a metaphor/not literal*. Those who are staunch upon the opinion that everything--let alone anything-- is metaphorical, the burden of proof is upon him. Let him bring forth his proof.
@@soulb.7870 we say the same thing bro. Read it. No how-ness can be said about Allah. That includes his location or whether he is encompassable or not. But the ayah "nothing is comparable to him." Clearly denies the posibility of location for him for that which has location automatically becomes comparable to other things which also have location. Therefore the literal meaning of the Statement "Allah is up in the sky" is false and most probably kufr. But the statement "Allah is everywhere" in the sense that "Allah cannot be encompassed in a particular location" is true, not in the sense that "Allah is like space".
@@easydev0 you cant say that Allah is everywhere in the sense that he is in diffused in everything like space. But you can say Allah is everywhere in the sense that he is not in one particular space because it is a quality of creation.( Being on or in sonewhere, having location)
Doesnt matter where. Our purpose is to serve and do as told.
2 місяці тому
Narrated Mu'awiyah b. al-Hakam al-Sulami: I said: Messenger of Allah, I have a slave girl whom I slapped. This grieved the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ). I said to him: Should I not emancipate her? He said: Bring her to me. He said: Then I brought her. He asked: Where is Allah ? She replied: In the heaven. He said: Who am I ? She replied: You are the Messenger of Allah. He said: Emancipate her, she is a believer. Sunan Abi Dawud 3282, Sahih (Al-Albani)
Only wahabis had problem to understand because wahabis is mujassimah and musyabbihan.
2 місяці тому+1
Narrated Mu'awiyah b. al-Hakam al-Sulami: I said: Messenger of Allah, I have a slave girl whom I slapped. This grieved the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ). I said to him: Should I not emancipate her? He said: Bring her to me. He said: Then I brought her. He asked: Where is Allah ? She replied: In the heaven. He said: Who am I ? She replied: You are the Messenger of Allah. He said: Emancipate her, she is a believer. Sunan Abi Dawud 3282, Sahih (Al-Albani)
I hope this understanding gets spread more and more. Barakallahu fiik sheikh.
It's not understanding, it's rejecting understanding in favor of acceptance. That's why so many stay muslim even in the 21th century. The proper understanding of islam is that it's man-made.
In Indonesia so many 'maulana/ustadh' get syubuhat from philosophy, May Allah guide us and them
Aameen
Biarkan aja.
Nanti antum dilabeli wahabi sama mereka.
Saya sudah coba menunjukkan bukti2 pake ayat Al Quran malah dianggap siapa saya koq langsung menafsirkan Al Quran seenak saya.
Dan mendaratkan label wahabi.
Biarkan aja susah dikasitau.
Mereka lebih percaya kiyainya, ustadnya daripada Quran.
Philosophy is dangerous knowledge like 2 handed sword if you lacking in akhidah you will grown astray for ever and even if you have it as times goes by it will doubt your akhidah eventually
@@menjaditaatkalo dahwah itu biar kata 1 ayat kasih tahu aja soal dia tolak itu urusan dia kita sudah mengamalkan kewajiban akan ilmu yg didapat soal di bilang apa kek terserah sih gak usah reply aja kata ustadz firanda juga gitu mirip dengan ulama ini pemahamannya
@@menjaditaatvery well said same happened to me. Western words like wahabi and islamist get chucked around. And actual scholars are slandered.
The Issue is people taking it in the literal sense, Allah doesn't literally have a human hand, as a divine exalted being, he uses these analogies for us to grasp something similar that Allah has that we cannot comprehend. The whole Quran is like imagine a grown adult whose had the highest level of studies in Science and is trying to explain it to a 5 year old [We are the 5 year olds].
Analogy? Allah's hands is real and not analogy
@@udaramalam7348Dude, he isn't denying Allah where He doesn't have hands, but he is saying that Allah's hands is not the same as a hand of a human (or any of His creations in particular)
@@FahmiZFXI agree Allah doesn't have anything similar to us human mortals and his body parts are unimaginable.
@@FahmiZFXwell said
@@Gunz1234exactly Subhan’Allah
Ya Allah help me to believe everything you have said without asking questions . Amen ya Allah
Amin
If u see things for what it is, U will sucseed Insha'h' ALLAH
That's the way to stay in any sect: "Don't question, don't apply logic."
its important to reflect to get the depth of insight, but at the same time, when u know something is f.exp haram. U should have that kind of respect towards it that u accsept it without trying to fabriqate it@@jesan733
May Allah the most high reward the shiekh
بارك الله فيك وجزاك الله خيرا أحبك في الله
Mashallah💓
Subhanallah 💓
Thank you so much for educating people💫🩷
Jazakallah khair💓
Allah knows best. Allahu akbar. May Allah forgive and accept us ameen.
Maa-Shaa-Allah
May Allah bless you
Masha allah
Yes absolutely how does Allah has these?
Me: "I Don't know in a way that's of befitting his majesty, but it doesn't bother me. I just to worry about the day of judgment."
ماشاءاللہ
You did good job 👍
Zklh 🙏
Aameen
4:10 ونحن اقرب اليه من حبل الوريد
Read the tafseer for that ayah. Read Ibn Katheer
@@liby254 share it here?
@@liby254u ta'wil that ayah?
@@Hayyanbassam ?? My opinion is worthless, as I'm not a scholar. Look at what Ibn Katheer the Mufassir says
There is a reason and a wisdom why Allah and the prophets of Allah did not reveal to us details about Allah. What we know is what we know from revelation (wahi) that is it. You want to see Allah then make it to Jannah
Why is the sound so low in volume?
Is allah on his arsh by place or we don’t know bcz god didn’t say it sunni ahlul sunnah wa jama3a answer pls
Shiehk how di you speak such good English and how did you learn so many sayings of the USA?
If I remember correctly, he has a degree in English language.
I think he was an english teacher at some point. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Asalamu aleykum.
I personally moved to america at the age of seven, though in five years time I had an impressive deep understanding and natural way of speaking, very american - that to the point, when I heard british english, I thought it was a different language, and I couldn't understand it.
If that's how a child managed to learn a language, then an adult can do more, due to more intellect, experience, etc.
I’m also very curious about this.
@@user-rd2wk3gy7u what’s the site?
السلام عليكم ورحمه الله
Imam Malik never explained 'Istawa' he simply said the word is known i.e known in the Quran . The speaker in this explained istawa by adding rising above to the statement. Look the statement up. Also Istawa has multiple meanings .The Quran also says Allah is near . So how do we take one literally and interpret another . Beware . May Allah protect us
Abdullah ibn Nafi’ reported: Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, was asked about the saying of Allah Almighty, “The Most Merciful rose above the Throne,” (20:5). The man said, “How is His rising?” Malik said, “The rising is acknowledged, its modality is unknown, and asking about it is an innovation. I see you are a man who intended evil with this question.”
Source: al-Istidhkār 2/529
Ibn Abdul Barr said, “The people of the Sunnah agreed upon affirming the divine attributes as reported in the Book and the Sunnah, interpreting them as reality and not as a metaphor, except that they do not ask ‘how’ is the modality of any of that.”
Source: al-‘Ulūw lil-‘Alī al-Ghaffār 1/250
Read the hadith about the slave girl after an altercation who was asked by the Prophet (peace be upon him):
“Where is Allah?”
She answered: “FI SAMA” (Allah is Above the Heavens)
He (peace be upon him) said: “ who am i”
She said; “you are the messenger of Allah”
He (peace be upon him) said: “set her free! She is a believer!”
@@MK-hw2ir
Also 'fi' means in not above, so this translation/interpretation is not 100 % accurate. Look it up in the oldest dictionaries. And Allah knows best
@@markward3981 in this context it does, because Allah Almighty says about Himself in the Glorious Qoran:
“Allah 3ala al3arsh ISTAWA”
=“Allah has RISEN OVER/ ABOVE His Throne” (in whatever way befits His Majesty)
You literally can’t get any clearer than this! Erase the sickness in you heart of only acknowledging revelation only when it makes sense to your reasoning, this is what iblies did when refusing to prostrate to Adam!
@@MK-hw2ir
'When my servants ask you concerning me ...tell them I am near' , the Quran also says this . 'I am closer to you than you life vein ' the Quran says this as well.
Assalamualaikum, any explanation about these 72 group of the ummah, are they in the hell for eternity or it is temporary????
and how do we know that we are in a part of the right group over other 72 group,,, or in the other false group outside those 73 group that mentioned?
There are hadith that say believers with a mustard seed of faith will enter Jannah, and other hadith that mention the sinful believers will be purified in jahannam before being brought into jannah. So likely being in hell is temporary for a believer. But you don't want to be in hell for even 1 sec as another hadith mentioned that a man who lived the most comfortable life in the dunia was dipped into hell for a moment, and after coming out he said that he has never experienced any pleasure before before being thrown back into hell
So long as you stick to the teachings of the Quran and hadith, and you do not innovate from it, insyaallah you are on the right path
Rewatch the video
Check your actions against Quran and the teachings of prophet Muhammad p.b.u.h - Sahih al Bukhari, Sahih al Muslim and other kutubi sitta. Question everything because nowadays governments won't let you to understand Islam deeply
Check Surah An’aam verse 159
Temporary. The hadith mentions *MY UMMAH* will split into 73 sects. This indicates that they are muslims and will not be in Hellfire for eternity.
For one to count as a muslim, they should pray their obligatory prayers, and neither say any words, have any beliefs nor commit any actions that constitutes as shirk or kufr (which includes denying or disbelieving in any ayat or authentic hadith, as that makes the person a kafir). That is the bare minimum.
To be clear, people from so-called sects like Qadiani are not even muslims because they say there is a prophet after Muhammad S.A.W, which is disbelief in what Allah has said in the Quran.
The prophet said do something well. Not like this poor audio.
Shejk Assim, it is you following shaitan, cuz Allah(swt) have no body parts as you describe HIM and according to quran Allah(swt) is everywhere and not limited to place or time!
The ignorance and arrogance Muslims have today about this subject is astoundingly annoying! These “Ashari’s” and other illogical sects do my head in.
I can't listen to poor editing
seek the truth brother not the quality of editing or audio
@@tegaradam5060 How can that person seek, when one can't hear it.
@@Mr-Safology first of all I can hear it so I think the sound is fine, and second if anyone feel they can't hear it right they can read the subtitles
@@tegaradam5060 Yes, we can hear it. That person can not, which is what I'm stating here. Subtitles, sure. Is it accurate enough? To me it is, as I can hear it and follow along. If I couldn't hear it, would I trust Google solely for the subtitles in terms of seeking knowledge? No.
This guy is far away from god because if u tasted gods power on a regular basis u would know for sure gods powers is in everything. We as humans if u advance speritually know that we refects gods wisdom this a reality because god talks to u and gods love flows out of u. He knows god on an intelectual level but not on a real level because u cant approch god with the intellect. Amd if he knew god he would be at peace and once u rally found. The truth once u find u find religion limits development because god is bigger thatn religion so u sit and enjoy gods precence and there is no need to convince anybody about anything.
sects insects
If you cant know anything about the how-ness of a thing that means you dont know anything about it. For example describe me a chicken that about it you cant answer any "how?" questions. Can you say that it has a beak without any how-ness? If you claim that it has a beak, even if you dont know its how-ness, you described it hence answered the how question. You may claim that you didnt add anything to the knowledge of the chicken because the beak you mentioned doesnt have any how-property, then why talk about the beak in the first place? Because if the beak is without how-ness, the word beak doesnt mean anything. So when they say that Allah established to the throne, while the ayah has meaning, they mean absolutely nothing. The problem occurs when they sneak in some how-ness to this statement i.e. that he is up in the sky. If you say that he is up in the sky you interpret the ayah and hence talk about the how-ness of Allah. They may say that they dont interpret the statement "Allah is in the sky" but use it anyways, we do infact know they interpret it because with this sentence they refute the Allah is everywhere statement. If you dont mean any meaning with a statement how can you refute a statement with a meaningless statement. If "Allah is up in the sky" statement is without any how-ness, without any meaning, than how can it contradict the Allah is everywhere statement? A meaningless statement cant contradict a meaningful statement. Thats because they secretly believe the literal meaning of Allah is up in the sky statement so they say: if Allah is up in the throne how can it be everywhere? If Allah meant by the word throne "space" then because the space is everywhere Allah is everywhere but we dont know and we dont even know that this statement is wrong or not. So to sum up: if they didnt truly interpret the ayah then they cant refute the statement "Allah is everywhere" because one cant refute a statement with a sentence that they dont know the meaning of. For example can you refute they statement "the earth is a Globe" with the statement "sjsnsjsdjdsksndks"? No because you dont know what it means. İf you claim that you can refute it then you indirectly say that you understand the meaning of "sjsnsjsdjdsksndks". The reason for this comes from the fact that They want to refute the claim that Allah is everywhere but if they do so with the "Allah established to the throne" ayah but in order to use this ayah they have to contradict the "nothing can resemble hım" ayah. So they switch sides depending on what they are dealing with. If they want to refute the "Allah is everywhere" statement then they give meaning to the ayah but if they are talking about the ayah itself then they claim that they dont know what it means because if they did they run the risk of describing Allah. All this effort is to refute the sufis and the shia but while they are trying this they contradict themselves. Because the salafiyah movement is infact a antithesis movement. They put nothing New to the table but they only get their power from refuting others and claiming the others unbelievers. And if you ask any further questions they say that your question is bidah. Where questions are bidah knowledge is bidah
Didn't read the whole thing, but describing something like a chicken or a human or any creation-- is different from Allah. That's the whole point of saying that we don't ask how. We can't even begin to imagine how jannah looks, yet some people try so hard asking "how" in regards to Allah. The bottom line is that we take the verses from the Quran and ahadith at face value, with the standard interpretation, *unless there is a given reason as to why we should take it as a metaphor/not literal*. Those who are staunch upon the opinion that everything--let alone anything-- is metaphorical, the burden of proof is upon him. Let him bring forth his proof.
@@soulb.7870 we say the same thing bro. Read it. No how-ness can be said about Allah. That includes his location or whether he is encompassable or not. But the ayah "nothing is comparable to him." Clearly denies the posibility of location for him for that which has location automatically becomes comparable to other things which also have location. Therefore the literal meaning of the Statement "Allah is up in the sky" is false and most probably kufr. But the statement "Allah is everywhere" in the sense that "Allah cannot be encompassed in a particular location" is true, not in the sense that "Allah is like space".
@@bbbbb2934
We can't say that Allah is everywhere then.
What a funny logic.
@@easydev0 you cant say that Allah is everywhere in the sense that he is in diffused in everything like space. But you can say Allah is everywhere in the sense that he is not in one particular space because it is a quality of creation.( Being on or in sonewhere, having location)
@@bbbbb2934
So, "everywhere" is not location?
Doesnt matter where. Our purpose is to serve and do as told.
Narrated Mu'awiyah b. al-Hakam al-Sulami:
I said: Messenger of Allah, I have a slave girl whom I slapped. This grieved the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ). I said to him: Should I not emancipate her? He said: Bring her to me. He said: Then I brought her. He asked: Where is Allah ? She replied: In the heaven. He said: Who am I ? She replied: You are the Messenger of Allah. He said: Emancipate her, she is a believer.
Sunan Abi Dawud 3282, Sahih (Al-Albani)
Only wahabis had problem to understand because wahabis is mujassimah and musyabbihan.
Narrated Mu'awiyah b. al-Hakam al-Sulami:
I said: Messenger of Allah, I have a slave girl whom I slapped. This grieved the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ). I said to him: Should I not emancipate her? He said: Bring her to me. He said: Then I brought her. He asked: Where is Allah ? She replied: In the heaven. He said: Who am I ? She replied: You are the Messenger of Allah. He said: Emancipate her, she is a believer.
Sunan Abi Dawud 3282, Sahih (Al-Albani)