Invariants: How Mathematicians Distinguish Between Objects

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 54

  • @heriander_
    @heriander_ 6 місяців тому +2

    I just wated to express my gratitude. Your videos on Calculus and Discrete Math series from years ago might have been the reason I survived college.
    Thank you from the bottom of my heart. ❤❤

  • @northernlight1000
    @northernlight1000 6 місяців тому +7

    This will be a legendary series! Thanks so much Dr.!

  • @briandwi2504
    @briandwi2504 6 місяців тому +9

    After your last video explaining your intentions I thought I'd watch. I have watched several of your University series and benefited from them. I am not a huge fan of 'popular ' maths, but this wasn't dumbed down and didn't patronise the viewer. I thought it was very interesting so great start Dr Trefor and the best of luck with this project.

    • @DrTrefor
      @DrTrefor  6 місяців тому +4

      Thank you so much, that is exactly my goal!

  • @Bunnokazooie
    @Bunnokazooie 6 місяців тому +3

    I love 3 coloring and isomorphisms, glad to see a spectacular introduction to it

  • @tateallen9972
    @tateallen9972 6 місяців тому +20

    I see the Peterson graph, I click

  • @mostafasaleh5594
    @mostafasaleh5594 6 місяців тому +7

    Very nice idea for a series Doc! Please do some abstract algebra in the future

    • @DrTrefor
      @DrTrefor  6 місяців тому +3

      Definitely some coming!

  • @ToolA10
    @ToolA10 6 місяців тому +1

    Clear explanation of invariance with easy to follow examples. Your excellent animations really help too! And thanks for defining terms like isomorphism. Many videos use it without doing so. Same thing for what the Determinant of a matrix means geometrically. Your depiction makes the linear algebra make more sense.

  • @johnchessant3012
    @johnchessant3012 6 місяців тому +3

    11:00 wow, that's a very interesting way to generate Pythagorean triples out of thin air!
    e.g. [[1, -1], [1, 1]] * [[m/n, 0], [0, n/m]] * [[1/2, 1/2], [-1/2, 1/2]] = (1/2mn) [[m^2+n^2, m^2-n^2], [m^2-n^2, m^2+n^2]]
    and the fact that this has determinant 1 gives us (m^2-n^2)^2 + (2mn)^2 = (m^2+n^2)^2.

  • @TomFarrell-p9z
    @TomFarrell-p9z 6 місяців тому +1

    Great start! Looking forward to the rest of the series.

  • @putin_navsegda6487
    @putin_navsegda6487 6 місяців тому +1

    thank you, always pleasure to watch your videos !

    • @DrTrefor
      @DrTrefor  6 місяців тому +1

      Glad you like them!

  • @_P_a_o_l_o_
    @_P_a_o_l_o_ 6 місяців тому +1

    Can't wait to see the next invariants!

  • @Itsmisterunknown9
    @Itsmisterunknown9 6 місяців тому +7

    Huge love from India

    • @DrTrefor
      @DrTrefor  6 місяців тому +4

      Thank you!

  • @PRIYANSH_SUTHAR
    @PRIYANSH_SUTHAR 6 місяців тому +3

    The study leave is totally going to be worth it.

  • @jimmelton
    @jimmelton 6 місяців тому +2

    Would love to see some in-depth linear algebra stuff!

    • @DrTrefor
      @DrTrefor  6 місяців тому +2

      I have a playlist on linear algebra - check it out!

    • @briandwi2504
      @briandwi2504 6 місяців тому

      @@DrTrefor It is brilliant!

  • @giornoGiovanna964
    @giornoGiovanna964 6 місяців тому +1

    I would love if you would do a number theory course I would love it

  • @kmjohnny
    @kmjohnny 6 місяців тому

    The more videos I watch on yt, the more I see how everything in math is connected. I wonder how all math is connected to Trefor's favorite T-shirt.

  • @ValkyRiver
    @ValkyRiver 6 місяців тому +2

    4:40 caveat - assuming no exclaves

  • @benjiusofficial
    @benjiusofficial 5 місяців тому

    I wish these would go more in-depth as to the connections between the invariants of each discipline.

  • @andrewharrison8436
    @andrewharrison8436 6 місяців тому +1

    Hmm: Invariants, bet Euler gets a mention (actually Maths, bet Euler gets a mention - the odds are good).
    My memory of topology is that it is entirely about Invariants - knot theory particularly.
    Anyway, not dissapointed, makes me realise that I need to revise matricies - that was elegant.

  • @AdnanKhan-h7u7c
    @AdnanKhan-h7u7c 6 місяців тому +1

    Beautiful shirt and interesting series..

  • @siamtalukdar-sx7uj
    @siamtalukdar-sx7uj 6 місяців тому

    It will be really heplful for a mechanical engineering student for Continuum mechanics if you make a course on Tensor Algebra And Tensor Analysis., as there is no reliable course on youtube or net.

  • @MegaMONI45
    @MegaMONI45 6 місяців тому

    Just finished my complex analysis exam and am a little drunk but came to say...Dr Bazett full-time youtuber LET'S GOOOOOOO!!!!!!

    • @MegaMONI45
      @MegaMONI45 6 місяців тому

      ps. If you're doing full-time youtube for a bit, Dr Bazett, could you have a crack at turning your wonderfully creative explanations to some hectics stuff? E.g. Curry-Howard Correspondence? Perhaps live stream you trying to solve the Collatz conjecture? Maybe run through the proof of the Poincare conjecture that won the millennium prize?! Just some ideas...

  • @SumanYadav-wr3cn
    @SumanYadav-wr3cn 6 місяців тому

    Sir please provide lectures on sieve theory

  • @broccoloodle
    @broccoloodle 21 день тому

    in short, invariant is a function to a set such that the set of same objects is a refinement of the set of fibers

  • @guruji75
    @guruji75 6 місяців тому

    Is there any link between invariants and conservation laws in physics? Im thinking Noether's theorem...

  • @ArdenChew271
    @ArdenChew271 6 місяців тому

    Will you do PDEs in the future

  • @fdileo
    @fdileo 6 місяців тому

    Could you recommend a book about graphs?

  • @Stellectis2014
    @Stellectis2014 6 місяців тому +1

    Two graphs have different chromatic numbers, there cannot be a graph isomorphism between them. Then how do you explain subgroups?

    • @DrTrefor
      @DrTrefor  6 місяців тому +1

      The chromatic number of a subgraph is less than or equal to the chromatic number of the original graph.

    • @Stellectis2014
      @Stellectis2014 6 місяців тому

      @@DrTrefor Thank you Dr. Trefor.

  • @Grassmpl
    @Grassmpl 6 місяців тому +1

    Good old Petersons graph

  • @robertveith6383
    @robertveith6383 13 днів тому

    @ Dr. Trefor Bazett -- You could have used *fewer* colors, not "less colors."

  • @Itsmisterunknown9
    @Itsmisterunknown9 6 місяців тому

    Hi sir

  • @me-tubemath7927
    @me-tubemath7927 6 місяців тому +1

    How to create videos plz make a video how to make video for videos like you?

    • @DrTrefor
      @DrTrefor  6 місяців тому +1

      I have this! ua-cam.com/video/hmQd_P_qj1w/v-deo.html

    • @me-tubemath7927
      @me-tubemath7927 6 місяців тому

      @@DrTrefor shifu, any source to learn matlab for graphing step by step.

  • @stapler942
    @stapler942 19 днів тому

    It's invariants and isomorphisms all the way down. Or something.

  • @sgiri2012
    @sgiri2012 6 місяців тому

    Topologists can't distinguish between the two diametrically opposite objects present in your v necked shirt. Expecting topology videos from you

  • @BirdsAreVeryCool
    @BirdsAreVeryCool 6 місяців тому +5

    I like geese

  • @EpicMethGaming
    @EpicMethGaming 6 місяців тому

    WHOOOOOAAAAAA SKIBID TILET??