I love seeing there are people out there who enjoy being alone with nature as much as I do. Sometimes it feels like I can’t relate to many but your videos remind me .. I want that lens!!
Who could then suppose that Canon would watch this video and make its RF 200-800! Dear Duade, you are now an influencer in the world of bird photography :))
For my own edification, I compared several aspects of this setup to the Panasonic G9 mark II fitted with a Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm f/4-6.3 lens. Your system gets 45 MP full frame; the Panasonic gets similar 200-800 full-frame equivalent on a half-size (micro four thirds, or MFT) 25 MP sensor. I'm well aware that there are many other technical spec differences in these two systems, but the G9 mark II is getting rave reviews for upgrades in many components, including eye-detection autofocus. Summary: If one is already heavily invested in Canon L-serious glass and other Canon peripherals, then going with the R series bodies and adapter makes sense (or if one really needs 45 MP). But if one is just looking to gear up for walk-about wildlife photography and you don't need all those pixels, then the Panasonic deserves a hard look. The weight and cost savings on big telephotos are considerable. Detailed numbers below (costs & specks gleaned from B&H's web). Canon R5 body: $2,999 (sale) - $3,899 (regular price); Weight: 738 g Canon EF 100-400 II f/4.5-5.6L lens: $2399; wt: 1640 g; Length at max extension: 193 mm Canon Extender EF 2X III (2-stop penalty)$429; wt. 325 g; L=52 mm Canon Mount Adapter EF-EOS R$129; 110 g; 24 mm Totals for the 4-piece Canon system: $5,956 (sale price on body) to $6,856; wt: 2813 g (6.2 pounds); L (including extension & adapter): 269 mm; Max aperture~ f/9 - f/11 Panasonic G9 Mark II: $1,898; wt: 575 g Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm f/4-6.3 lens: $1,798; wt: 985 g; L at max extension: 263 mm Totals for the Panasonic system: $3,696; wt: 1560 g (3.4 pounds); Lens length: 263 mm; Max aperture: f/4-6.3
Great example of how to change that last background to green, and show what it's like to be out there trying to get photo's of sometimes uncooperative birds! Thanks
A very timely video Duade i’ve just recently picked up the first series push pull EF100mm-400 and 2x teleconverter, and now I’m waiting for the rain to stop up here in the tropics so I can go out Birding.
Good luck, the 2x does impact AF and IQ so you will need nice light to get it to work at its best. Also try shooting at f/13 which helped increase sharpness slightly. Cheers, Duade
Top video. I knew someone who made a floating hide to get close to nesting Great Crested Grebes. I have waded into the water up to my armpits to take photos of nesting Cormorants. Everything was working well until I got a cramp in my leg due to the cold water. I almost dropped my gear into the water.
Pauline, yes, a floating hide would be a good idea, I have fallen in the water with my gear before, not fun, killed my camera unfortunately. Cheers, Duade
I didn't know about the different coloured eyes for the galahs as the way to tell which is male and female. I've learnt something! Some great kestrel shots. So cool to have seen it with some food.
I enjoyed the video very much - thanks. I have been using the exact same rig as you and am more than happy with the 2x teleconverter. I cannot see any of the image softness that is supposed to be a problem with teleconverters. In fact I am finding it super sharp. Also here in the dark rainforest of north Queensland I have to use very high ISO but I have found that processing the raw file in DXO Pure Raw strips out all the noise and sharpens the feather detail remarkably. I think the camera and lens correction that DXO applies may be part of the reason for this remarkable detail and sharpness.
Grant, thanks for sharing your experience, I was surprised by the results to be fair. It does take a bit of a hit in IQ, AF but you are doubling your focal length. Cheers, Duade
I haven't had my heart get a turbo boast watching utube for a long time, but when that kestrel landed on the stump the adrenalin kicked in. Pity he didn't stay but hey it worked out for you in the end.
Dude you won't believe it! I have a Canon R5 camera and yesterday I bought a Canon EF 100-400mm II lens and I was thinking about the results with the 2X III teleconverter. This video came just in time.
Congrats on the lens, the 2x works but the IQ and AF do take a hit so I would not suggest using all the time, only in the best light. The 1.4 III converter works much better. Good luck, Cheers, Duade
Another great video! I noticed you seemed to forget about the pelicans. I would had done the exact same thing. Pelican vs raptor, raptor wins everytime. I was playing with my 90d with the sigma 150 600 with 1.4 on it yesterday. No trouble with the focus. I haven't put them on the computer yet. They were just a few from off my back yard feeders. Looks like you well on your way into summer. Hoping to hit low 50's today put here in winter brings rain. Have a great day!
Guy, yes, I got distracted by the Raptor and I missed the Pelicans, in hindsight I would have liked a shot of them but the Raptor got the priority. Great to hear you are enjoying the lens. Cheers, Duade
We get a lot of birds on our place but because I'm not out taking photos as such I miss out on most of them. We get Peregrine Falcons up under our verandah, I've been inside and seen one flying past the kitchen window by the time I've grabbed the camera its gone. I've been lucky to get a few wedge tail shots. White winged fairy wrens everywhere but do you think I can ever spot the males, not very often and its just a flash. Good to see even you have trouble sometimes approaching birds, makes me feel a bit better. Once again very informative and interesting, love watching. PS my Sigma 150-600 has arrived but so far all I've taken is cat and horse photos, but I'm happy with that so far.
Great to hear Lisa, sounds Like some great birds, the male WWFW is truly stunning and I really want some more shots of that species. Good to hear the lens is performing well. Cheers, Duade 👍
Would you believe just been on a hay run and I managed to bag a few shots of some corellas drinking from a dam with the Sigma. Just on the side of the main road. Was terrified they were going to fly away, couldn't believe my luck.
Enjoy your video's . Just for the heck of it, I would of flipped crop mode on with the 2X on to see what you would of got with the Grebes way out . I do it quite often with the the 1.4 on the 100-400II & 150-600 and get surprisingly good results., of course we are talking in good light like you had.
Thanks for the comment, the final cropped image was likely very close to the 1.6 crop mode. I wish Canon allowed you to have crop mode in the viewfinder but record the full frame image like some other brands. This way the bird is bigger in the viewfinder but you don't lose any pixels. Cheers, Duade
Great video as always, but I believe there were two very peeved pelicans for not featuring!! Always guessed your boots were for snake protection and would be interested in knowing what they are and where you got them, as they don't seem to be just ordinary gumboots. Performance of the kit was very acceptable, with the performance of the R5 really shining through. Exceptional shot of the kestrel fanned out. Well done!!
Chris, I was actually a little annoyed at myself I didnt take a shot of the Pelicans but the raptor got my focus. The boots are Muck Boots Muckmuster High which were given to me for a birthday gift, I got them at a local camping store. Cheers, Duade
Great video Duade, looks like a very enjoyable session. Good tips about approaching in stages and taking shots as you go. The photos look great too, although a bit bright on my iPad. Mobile bird photography like that is very appealing.
Yes, I have used blinds and camo for when I am waiting for a bird, or a bird is flighty. It likely helps for certain birds that are flighty, it can get pretty hot under blinds here in summer and I like to move around. It might be worth getting a suit and trying, I guess. Cheers, Duade
Wow that is absolutely fantastic, normally with the use of TC there is a noticeable drop in IQ.but that combination on the R5 produces some stunning results.
@@Duade it is definitely a combo to keep in mind. Not sure what state you are in, but years ago before I got into Photography I spent some time near Hunter Valley NSW. Will be going back once the borders are open to tourists. But until then I will be keeping an eye out for your videos.
A great day out Duade. Love the kestrel encounter. I did wonder about the wellies, hadn't thought about snakes, hardly see any here in the UK. As I was watching this video I was expecting you to pull out a ghillie suit or jacket from your backpack. Do you use one on occasions?
Nice video! Good work getting some nice Kestrel shots. I have never gotten a decent pic of one. Just good enough pics for ID a couple of times. I finally got the RF 100-500 and will likely end up with both extenders for that. At some point I would like to try the new RF 100-400 with the extenders. That might end up being a super light and flexible package.
Rod, congrats on the lens, I am sure you will love it. I hope to try the RF100-400 soon so will be able to share my thoughts on that lens. Cheers, Duade
Great video, Duade! There are no crocs in that water, are there? LOL. Australia has to be one of the most dangerous places on earth. Well, the first question which came to mind and obviously someone already beat me to it is how does the EF 100-400mm + 2x TC compare to the RF 800mm f/11? Do you think the 800mm will be sharper? Also, what happens when you use the 2x TC on the EF 100-400mm as in does it also shrink the focusing area like the 800mm too?
Thanks Alex, yeah, no crocs down here in the south thankfully. For pure reach, AF, IS and IQ I think the RF800 performs slightly better. But the 6m MFD, fixed focal length and the smaller AF area are its limitations. I was surprised that the 100-400 keeps the AF coverage even with extenders. If I had to choose one lens, I would go with the 100-400 as its just more versatile and I would likely use the 1.4 extender most of the time. But if you were on a budget and didn't have any wildlife lenses and wanted reach the RF800 is hard to beat. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Thanks, Duade. Well, I am already using the Sigma 150-600mm on my R5. I am planning to move over to Sony anyway, but I am waiting for the A1a or A1 II with the updated higher res LCD screen. So, I was just wondering whether I should just get the RF 800mm f/11 just to play with for the time being until the new A1 arrives when I trade in all my Canon gear. But, yea that shrunk down focusing area is a bit of a bummer really.
Hi Duade, love your work. In these isolated areas where you might not have any phone signal always worth carrying a PLB beacon in case of an emergency, snake bite, fall, heart problem. Just in case ,cheap insurance.
Great video, really helpful to see you work things out in the field, things that I myself struggle with such as birds flying off, not being able to get close enough and angle of view. Locally the trees are really high so cant get shots when birds are in the canopy, so I go to certain spots a little further away with smaller trees but these areas tend to be more open, so I have trouble approaching birds, good to see it can just be a bit of luck, sometimes the bird wont fly off sometimes it will.
Kurtis, yes it can be very difficult approaching wild birds and luck plays a big part. I think that is why water spots are so good as you get the birds coming to you down low. Cheers, Duade
great video , i had this combo with R6 for over a year and enjoyed it very much. you might miss some flying shots but amazing for field shots. looks like with R5 even flying shots are easy and good. then i bought RF 100-500 and struggling with focus lock many times..
Really enjoy your walkabout videos. Seeing you have some of the same issues (birds keep moving away from you) is positive reinforcement, lol! I have a the R5 with the RF100-500 and 2x converter though I rarely use the 2x. Only on the brightest days and clear air does it seem to provide the best images and sometimes the 300mm minimum focal length is just too much. I don’t like switching lenses in the field. I recently had a gorgeous day with near perfect light but with the 2x on my shots of a rarely-spotted male Bufflehead duck with its mate were not so clear. I managed so salvage a few through the magic of software but would rather have had less reach and more clarity, even with fewer pixels, than what I ended up with. Thanks for another great video! Oh, and one of the details I like best about them is the fact that you show the raw image as well as the final edit!
Thanks for sharing your experience and I have had the same experience with the 2x on the 100-500, cropping seems to be the way to go with that lens. Cheers, Duade
Ended up returning my 100-400 MK2, focal length just isn't enough for smaller birds, or even average sized birds for just walking around... Nice lens, just lacks reach.
Totally agree on FF cameras, 400 is just a little too short. On an APSC it is fine at 640 FOV but the 600 zooms just give you that little more reach. The 1.4 extender does work well on the R5 and is another option. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Yeah, I bought one as a secondary to my 600 f4 but everytime I picked up that 100-400, just felt massive disappointment with the reach for even having a little stroll around lol. I'll just use my 70-200 for my random walks. :)
Thanks again for sharing your amazing performance. I wanted to test 100-400 ll with Canon R6 once then I thought, it maybe not good functioned. But seeing your performance with Canon R5 i would like to test with R6😀 💪 By the way I used your coupon code for buying Topaz Denoise through your link.Thank so much for getting discount. 🙏
thanks for the support, yes the 100-400 will work very well on the R6, I will be testing the RF100-400 soon so you may want to see that review before buying the EF100-400. Cheers, Duade
Oh almost forgot, if youput concrete in the bottomof a bucket to hold a post for a perch, its heavy , you can do the same thing with a tube of crazy foam from Amazon.. Light as a feather.
Great walkabout video. I use the same lens. Had a aftermarket 2x TC but was using it on an RP. I have a R6 and am thinking of a TC again but will probably hold off until getting the RF 100-500. Also, I have my bright white lens wrapped in a nice camo. One less thing to stick out to animals saying look at me!!
This a great. I just upgraded from the T6i APS-C camera to a 6D Markii full frame. I had a 70-300 USM for the T6i that was awesome for bird photography. It had an effective focal length of 480mm. For now I have a 80-200mm Magic Drainpipe and it just doesnt' cut the mustard for long range stuff at all. Basically, I went from a 480mm focal length to a 200mm focal length. Looking now at getting a 100-400 L with an extender to get the range back. I was thinking to get the 1.4 extender, but in good light that 2.0 is MONEY!! I'm also possibly considering getting rid of the 6D Mark ii for the new R10 or R7 APS-C camera. I'm not much of a portrait guy and after using both APS-C and full frame cameras, I kind of like what an APS-C camera can do.
My EF 500 II paired with a 2X III produces exceptional results, especially with the R5. Even my Tammy 150-600 G2 is quite good with the 2X.... not as good as the big white... and no AF.... live view might work..... Been a while since I tried... I doubt it would work at all for birds in flight....
Another great video mate. I'm learning so much from watching. Thank you mate.. I love your DJI pocket on the camera for video I'm guessing. 👊👊👊🤟🤟🤟🤟👍👍👍 great work . Mikey
Thanks for the video. I currently own a 5Dmiii and 100-400ii. I am considering to upgrade to a R7 which is cropped. What would be your thought about having an extender in an APS-C? I feel that it would be more useful in a full frame camera but I have 0 experience with extenders
I own the 100-400 mk ii with the 1.4 mk iii, and because of this vid I got interested in the 2x iii for more reach. But the comment I’m reading on the 2x on the Canon site say it will not autofocus on the 100-400 but you don’t seem to be having problems with the AF. They say you can use the LCD but not the EVF. You seem o using both. The 1.4 AF oddly works fine. Any probs on your end. Thank you.
It is a little confusing but the 2x will work on any Canon Mirrorless RF mount camera with the adapter. So, the R6/R5 will AF with the 2x and 100-400 which you saw in this video. DSLR's such as the 90D or 5D mark 4 will not be able to autofocus with a 2x as the max aperture for DSLR AF is f/8 and this lens becomes an f/11 with a 2x. I hope that helps. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Thank you for the explanation. I called Canon about this and they said that it will work with DSLR is like the 90 D and the 5D in live view mode. Since Canon mirror less cameras are in lice view mode all the time it should work as you said. Do you think that the two times extender is worth buying for the 100-400 versus the 100-500?
Hi Duade, really enjoying your videos. Thanks for all the hard work you put into them. I am curious as to your take on the image quality between the EF 100-400 w/ 2x tele versus the Rf 800mm f/11.
I’m interested in this question too if it hasn’t been addressed, I have a feeling having used to f11 before it will be sharper, but if the 100-400 + TC could serve double duty that would awesome… but I am doubtful based on the example shots and other vids I’ve seen that the 100-400 + tele @ 800 could beat out the 800f11 in most wildlife scenarios
Bob, the RF800 f/11 is better then the 100-400 + 2x at 800, it is just a little more consistent, the AF is slightly quicker, IS is better. But there are some downsides to the RF800, its 6m MFD makes it very difficult to photograph certain birds if they get too close. You have that fixed focal length and aperture. If I could only have one lens, I would go with the 100-400 and converters for flexibility, but if I just needed pure reach for birds the 800 f/11 would be it. I tend to think you really need a zoom to complement the 800 prime. So maybe the RF100-400 is an option. Cheers, Duade
You answered my question about the 100-400 mm and the 2x teleconverter. Wonder how that arrangement would work with the R as the R5 is a bit more than I want to commit to. Thanks again for a real-world bird photography experience!
Robert, I am sure it would work well on the R, the AF might not be as good but it should work. It may also be worth seeing if Canon do release the long rumoured APSC mirrorless body also. Cheers, Duade
Hi Duade. Very nice video. I’m a bird photographer but I don’t have the budget to buy gear like the R5 or a 100-400 m2, so I’m using a 75-300mm and I’m planning to buy a sigma 100-400. I know you can’t simply try every lens there is, but, if it’s possible for you, could you do a video trying bird photography with the 75-300 to see what you can get? Maybe you could even make a video trying very cheap gear vs your current gear, just an idea though. Anyway, amazing content, you’re my favorite UA-camr on this platform.
Yes, that would make for an interesting video, I don't have access to that lens at the moment. I did make the Canon 40D and Sigma 150-600C which can be picked up for $600 used USD. ua-cam.com/video/0Oam6cRR__0/v-deo.html Cheers, Duade
@@Duade yeah i considered the Sigma 150-600C but I think the 100-400 will be a better option for me because I almost never shoot on a tripod and the 150-600 is quite heavy
John, it is funny how these sayings come out without conscious thought, I must have picked it up from my folks in NZ growing up, not sure. Cheers, Duade
Love your channel. I watch and rewatch many episodes! Do you feel this lens and 2x combo performs better than the Sigma/Tamron 150-600 lenses on Canon mirrorless?
Thanks, that is a great question, my personal feeling is the 2x is a good light only option and has an impact on IQ and AF, the 1.4 is far better and does not appear to suffer anywhere near as much. I think the Sigma is sharper then with converters but it does have some AF issues at times. Cheers, Duade
G'day Duade, thanks for yet another awesome testament of birding passion 😀 As you know, moving with this lens from an APS-C to the R6, I'm still craving for more reach, even with the 1.4x. And given the 100-500 is financially out of reach, I am torn between getting the 2x or the 800/11 as a next step. Last week a certain German called Jan labelled this lens with the 2x a "bit hit and miss" .. and he almost pulled me over to the 800/11 camp even while I dislike the 6m MFD and lack of weather sealing. However this video makes it a again a much tougher call. Or maybe it proves you have much more stable hands and skills than him (which we should never tell him, heheh) ?? Nice trick to use the LCD for a nicer background ! And I mostly love you flight shot of the Kestrel !! My best ever shot with 70D and Tamron 16-300 (2 weeks before I got my 100-400ii) was a male kestrel, sitting only 26m away from me at eye-level on top of a tree which started much lower than my path. If only you had a ladder with you to get eye level with your female kestrel 😉
Werner, It is a tough call but the RF800 f11 is better then this combo at 800. The IQ, AF and IS are just better, but it has its weaknesses as you have pointed out. One consideration is the RF800 F11 and the RF100-400, that combo would cover most situations very well. I hope to try the RF100-400 shortly and will give my thoughts. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade hmm, with its weight and price, the RF100-400 could be very compelling for beginners .. but it badly lacks weather sealing (which would hurt me more on an versatile zoom compared to a dedicated 800/11) and I would be hugely surprised if the RF100-400 would beat the EF100-400ii on IQ. Otherwise Canon would not have raised the price of the 100-400ii with 25% since I bought it just 13 months ago .. a shootout between the RF and EF 100-400 would be very interesting though ..
@@Duade heheh, if the RF version would be better, then I should quickly swap my EF and get the RF version plus the 800/11 for that resale value 😛 based upon what I have, the 800/11 costs more than twice the TC2x .. and both options have their limitations ..
Great time. At about 14:45 while your trying to capture the Pipit on the stump the vid shows your lens hood. A small hatch open on the top of the hood, what does the hatch do? BTW. Based on your comments I have started the wheels turning to purchase a 100-400 ii for my 7dii. Tha KS for the input
Hope it's ok if I help out here. The hatch in the hood is used to access and adjust a circular polarizer without removing the lens hood. Also, I have this lens on a 7Dii and it works very well. With my older Sigma 1.4x TC autofocus still works, but center point only.
Yes, Colt is correct, though I don't use filters, so I don't really use that feature. The 100-400 is a great lens and should work well on the 7D. Cheers, Duade
Hi Duade, Great video, love the in the field ones. I bought the 100-400mm Mk11 when it first came out and 1.4 extender lives on it all the time but obviously can’t use 2X on 5D4. Lack of light here in the UK is a constant challenge being stuck on F8, also have a 500mm F4 Mk11 Lens which I will never part with and I’m totally satisfied with the results I get but I am saving for an R5 because the 560mm focal length I get with the 100-400mm is a bit short. Just wish Canon would bring out a 200-600mm like the Sony option even the 100-500 option doesn’t seem worth all the expense over what I already have. I do like the freedom of walking around with the 100-400mm set up on my Black Rapid Strap. 100-500mm plus 1.4 extender for a walk around set up with R5 seems my only option at the moment. R5 to start with and pray they come up with 200-600mm 🙏😁 . You definitely have a gift with the in the field videos your Passion for it shines through. Regards Chris.
Chris, thanks for sharing your experience, I understand your dilemma and I wish we had a 200-600 as well. I think if the R7 is a mini R3 paired with the 100-500 will be the way to go as the 1.6 crop will give you 800 FOV which should be plenty. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade R7 could be the answer, but not sure I would want to move away from Full Frame Camera I’ve grown to love my 5D4 set up and the only reason for change is the prospect of no new EF lenses likely to be developed. So going forward will to be Mirrorless when they sort the focusing issues.
@@unknownKnownunknowns HI Steven, with 500mm F4 mk 2 Lens you can but definitely notice drop off in picture quality. With the 100-400 mk 2 Lens you are limited to F8 with 1.4 extender, with 2X extender I don’t think the auto focus works and there just isn’t enough light.
Thanks mate, yep IQ takes a hit for sure, but I did have nice light which helped. If I owned a 100-400 and needed more reach this would be a useful option. Cheers, Duade
Jack, thanks for the feedback, I got given the hat as a gift from Trust for Nature, I am unsure if they are selling them or just had a batch made for their supporters. Cheers, Duade
Not sure if you’ve covered this in any of your videos but have you ever tried the canon 400 f4.0 ii lens? Any comments? No zoom (of course) but you’re shooting at the long end mostly it seems anyway. An extra stop of light. And it’s lighter and shorter. Of course significantly more expensive.
G'day Dave, yes, I have been fortunate enough to use the RF800 F11 and I had fun using it. I did a video with it here ua-cam.com/video/Kor_MZw1EN4/v-deo.html I have been asked a few times if this combo works so thought I would try it out. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade I also have the 100-400 II and using on my R6 and R. Both lenses are very good on the new R system. Other might like to try it shooting the Moon on a clear night. f/11 then try 200 either side, 1/200 iso 200 with IBIS and Len Stabilizer. Blows me a way each time I do it. When you send the sunshine back to us in the UK I will grab some of our birds, once with wings also lol. I wish you well.
If I’d have known You were near Bendigo I would have popped LOL. Will you be trying the RF 100-400 I’d be interested in your thoughts. Also apparently works will teleconverter. Would be great to see more water in Eppalock still looks pretty low.
Paul, I was there for one afternoon as I had work the next day in Castlemaine so popped in for a session. I hope to try the RF100-400 soon so keep an eye out. I have not really done any birding in Bendigo itself, any places worth checking out? Cheers, Duade
Hey Duade, I had the 100-400 mk1 and 2X, at the time on a 20D then 40D: never really got any worthwhile keepers. The Mk2 and R5 sure have moved things on a bit! I'm still holding out for the RF100-500 though, and will probably get a 2X with that.
Yes they have come a long way, I remember using the original 300 2.8 with a 2x and I thought the AF was broken it was that slow to focus. The mirrorless bodies just seem to work much better with extenders. The RF100-500 is a wonderful lens and worth saving for. Good luck, Cheers, Duade
It seems to me that the theme was: You spot a bird and chase after it. I’m certainly no expert, but the advice I always hear from experts is: Don’t chase after the birds. Instead try to predict where they’ll eventually land, get there before the bird, wait and be ready to shoot when it arrives.
Lau, thanks for the comment, there are numerous different ways to photograph birds and I did a video showing the 5 common ways which includes the method you suggest. ua-cam.com/video/X_3sNmoGP60/v-deo.html As this was my first time visiting this location, I had no idea where the birds might land, and it would be hard to create a UA-cam video of me sitting and waiting and possibly not getting anything. By walking and shooting it allowed me to get some photos I may not have otherwise captured. At the end of the day, you should adopt whichever method you enjoy and brings you the most success. Cheers, Duade
Appreciate the vid. I run the 100-400 mark ii on my 5Div for photographing eagles and the added reach is always compelling to see. Have you done any sort of comparison on the sharpness of the images when the lens is native vs with the 2x? I had an earlier version of the 2x that I would pair with my 300F4L with marginal success. Because of this, I've sold the converter and added a Tamron G2 150-600 to the bag (which I'm very happy with).
The 2x does impact AF and IQ and is not something I would use unless I had very nice light. The R5 does perform well and much better than DSLRs with TC which is interesting. The 150-600 is the better option on a DSLR. Cheers, Duade
Thanks for the video. I am interested in your tracking settings for the R5. I only dabble in wildlife photography and have traditionally photographed surfing, cricket and other sports. Since the introduction of motorsport tracking with the firmware 1.5 for the R5, I have not managed to get the similar results that I was getting with FW1.4 and earlier for sport. As I spend more time shooting wildlife, any settings for tracking stickiness or acceleration etc and the tracking modes you prefer for BIF would be great if you care to share. Regards,
Kurt, sorry to hear you have found 1.5 a step backwards. I have it set to Animal Eye AF, and use very similar settings to Jan in his video ua-cam.com/video/-nnRqgXu7QI/v-deo.html&ab Cheers, Duade
Thanks that's great information and great photos! Do you feel that the speed of the autofocus of that lens on the R5 is considerable faster without the extender?
Great video! I have a Canon 7DMarkll with the Canon100-400. How do you think the 2X converter would work with this set-up? By the way snakes were you worried about running into?
James, the autofocus wont work with the 100-400 and the 7D with a 2x unfortunately, you could try a 1.4 which would make your lens f8, but on the 7D I think you have reduced AF points, the AF slows down and IQ does take a hit. I would only use that combo in very good light otherwise the lens is better on its own and cropping. I am mainly concerned about Brown Snakes, Cheers, Duade
Duade. Seen all your videos and I like the honesty and simple to understand items which led me to buy the R5. One question though. What Case do you use when you shot the kestrel? On AF? Case 1-4? Also did you tweak the tracking and accel/decel? And Electronic shutter or EFCS? I still have difficulty focusing in the viewfinder with a bird in flight and I have the 100-400 with 1.4x combo. Thanks
Thanks for the comment, I setup my camera very similar to Jans video which you can check out. I shoot with Electronic Shutter most of the time. With BIF it is very tricky, you really need to prefocus roughly on the focal plane you expect the bird to be, so I will usually focus on the ground or a tree then lift the camera to the sky of in the direction of the bird. The camera does a pretty good job of finding the subject using eye tracking. In saying all this BIF is probably the most difficult types of photography and there is a lot of luck and patience. Cheers, Duade - Jans Video: ua-cam.com/video/-nnRqgXu7QI/v-deo.html
Hi Duade, I've been on a binge of your videos recently, especially when I was considering picking up the R6 mkII. I currently shoot with an 80D + EF 100-400 IS II and was wondering how it fared on the R6 mkII. This video has helped me consider maybe picking up an EF 2x extender instead of splashing cash on a new RF 800mm f11 lens as a sensible, cost effective choice. I'm really looking forward to photographing winter migratory birds with my new R6 mkII, so thanks a lot for your videos :) Also loved the way you're walking around the tree, trying to find a better angle. I've been slowly getting better at that myself and can't wait to get back on the field this month
Duade I only recently found your channel and I found your style very watchable, pleasing and informative I am basically an amateur aircraft photographer at airshows and the such and only recently started bird photography because I had all the gear lying otherwise unused due to the covid restrictions on life. can you tell me why does the 2x extender / lens combination autofocus work with the R5 but not with DSLR?
Wally, thanks for the comment and I am glad you found the channel and are getting into bird photography. DSLR and Mirrorless use completely different AF systems. The DSLR needs to send light up to the optical viewfinder and to the AF sensor at the bottom of the camera. Basically, at a max aperture of f11 (400 5.6 x2 = 800 f11) there is not enough light for a DSLR to work accurately and the viewfinder starts to get dark. On a mirrorless body there is no optical viewfinder or separate AF sensor, all the light hits the sensor, and the sensor does the focusing based off the image on the sensor. Mirrorless bodies can AF even up to a max aperture of f/22 which is crazy when compared to a DSLR. I hope that helped, Cheers, Duade
Another great video. I have everything but the 2x .. Maybe I should buy one. I love the 800 but every now and then in Maine (like yesterday) a Moose or a deer pops into view and with the 800 I am often too close to get a full body shot. This would be a great solution. Looks like the sharpness is comparative at 800mm ?? Now off to go chase the Steller's Sea Eagle which is 30 miles from me at the moment !!
Dan, sounds like you are having fun. The 800 primes do have better IQ, AF then this combo, it is probably not something you would want to use all the time to be fair but can be used if you really need the reach. But as a versatile all around lens it is very good. I will be trying the RF100-400 soon and the RF100-500 is another option. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade BTW I found the Steller's Sea Eagle in Boothbay harbor this morning. Got off a few shots but he or she was 1800 feet away but still more than good enough to identify. Talk about RARE!!!
Love your videos. loads of useful information. I have the Canon 7D Mk II and Canon 100-400 is II. Just purchased the Canon 2X III Extender but it seems that AF does not work with this combination. Do you know of a way to overcome this?
G'day, unfortunately no DSLR's will autofocus with a max aperture higher than f/8, when using a 2x on the 100-400 it becomes a 200-800 f/11 as you lose two stops of light. So it starts at 400 5.6, with a 1.4 you lose 1 stop so 560 f/8 then 2 stops with the 2x is 800 f/11. It will work on a mirrorless so when you upgrade to the R7 or other mirrorless body the converter will work due to the different autofocus system. Cheers, Duade
Very engaging video!! I was shooting at my laptop screen, when the kestrel flew up from the trunk, and again when I saw the mouse (ok bird ;)) :) Btw, do you think changing the perspective in post, when shot at a for you unacceptable angle, would do the trick?
Great video! Thank you! I also got similar results using that combination as well as with my canon M6 Mark Ii although in good light and high shutter speeds for best results. Thanks for your help last year in choosing this lens over the RF 100-500mm as a more affordable option. 😊 I also get to use the Speed Booster with it in low light with is a nice option that you don’t have in low light. 😉
James, yes if you already own the 100-400 it does work well until you can afford the RF100-500. The IQ and AF do take a hit but gives you plenty of focal length in exchange. Cheers, Duade
@@GrantPhillipsmastamak It’s a focal reducer for crop sensors or full frame mirrorless camera that have a crop mode. Does the opposite that of a tele converter. You can find out more details on UA-cam if you wish.
@@Duade Thank you for all of your videos, I enjoy your knowledge and passion! If you were using a 1.4x converter instead of the 2x, do you think the AF would be faster? I have an R6 and EF 100-400 Mk2 also but would like more focal length so I'm looking at how best to achieve that. Thank you
Very nice, Tnx for taking us along. I have this combo and also the 1.4x and for versatility and size it is very good but IQ and AF speed n accuracy takes a hit. Were you using the electronic or the mechanical shutter? I just wanted to say put hood the other way around so that the window/hatch for the filter is at the bottom so even if you forget it open/or don’t have time to close less ambient light gets in. After using this lens for several years I noticed it makes a difference and in actual fact once you get used to it it’s better cause if you use a CP you can turn it without taking your eye from the viewfinder/using the same hand that holds the barrel of the lens (assuming you have long enough and dexterous fingers) as I noticed in a couple of your video clips the lens hood windows/hatch was at the top and open. On days I know I’m not using a CP I just put a bit of gaffer tape to make sure the lens hood hatch stays closed.
Dimitris, thanks for the detailed response and thanks for the tip re the hood. I was using electronic shutter during this shoot. I agree that AF speed and IQ take a hit with the converter, it is just amazing this combo even works on a mirrorless body. Cheers, Duade
does af work with the loss of light, 2 stops i think with the 2x? Think you really need a f2.8 lens to get the best from it, a 300mm usually. I use the 1.4x and it really struggles to focus on anything moving. I rarely use it as the loss of image quality and shutter speed isnt worth it, and upping the res in photoshop generally gives a better result anyway
Hi Duade, I discovered your channel a few days ago and have now watched many of your videos, including the one with your back-story. Thanks for producing them - they are really interesting and full of great information. Canon are about to announce their EOS R7 camera, presumably a replacement for the 7D II which I have at the moment. I'm tossing up whether to buy one of them once they are released or go full-hog and buy a R5 - my wife is OK with that! I'm into travel and landscape photography mostly but also like macro photography and portraiture. Any thoughts on the R7 vs the R5?
Ken, the R5 is the better all around camera for landscape and macro etc as the 45mp sensor is beautiful. The R7 would be great for small birds. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Thanks Duade, appreciate your reply. Looks like it's going to be an R5 and your response backs up what I was thinking anyway. Might keep the 7D II also though as the resale value isn't great here in NZ.
John, the RF800 f11 is better than the 100-400 at 800 with the 2x, the AF, IQ and IS are just more accurate and reliable. In saying that it has its shortcomings with the 6m MFD, reduced AF coverage and fixed aperture and focal length. If you already own the 100-400 then a 2x is a great addition and option should you need reach. Ideally, I think you would need some sort of zoom to complement it like the RF100-400 perhaps. I have no used a 600 5.6 but that would be a nice focal length and speed. Cheers, Duade
Great video, Duade! I currently have the 100-400 ii and a 1.4x mkiii extender, but have been toying with the idea of reading them in for the 100-500. I’ve been on the fence for a long while now and can’t decide. Would you say it’s a worthwhile upgrade or would you recommend sticking with the setup I currently have? Thank you
Hi I have traded the 100-400 for the 100-500 and dont regret. The extra 100 mm is welcome and slightly faster focusing and lighter a wonderful lens. Initially you compare and now I love it. and it is brilliant with the converters.
Gavin, I have to agree with rentoulzz below, the RF100-500 is a match made in heaven for the RF system. It is overpriced but boy is it sharp and you can use a 1.4 converter with it giving you 700mm. Cheers, Duade
I use a 100-400mm mk ii and added a cheap, second hand 2x ii. Focusing speed is not great and the IQ reduces a tad. But with the software that we have today, such as Topaz Denoise and others, we can easily recover the sharpness. I sometimes play with my 2x and a 1.4x iii together (yes, they fit together) and go crazy with 1.120mm of focal length. Both with the 2x and with the 2x + 1.4x combo, we get a nicer bokeh because of the longer focal length, especially when we're close to the subject. I've seen some reviews of the RF gear; they're great, but they come with a premium price that I'm not sure will make a huge difference in the final results. But if you're up to a splurge, why not?
@@cmeluzzi I ended up selling my 100-400 ii and 1.4x iii just over a month ago and got the 100-500 and I absolutely love it. Sharpness wise they are very similar, but af speed is quicker on the 100-500. Also the IS is amazing for handheld video even at 500mm (which I didn’t quite expect to be as good as it is) The 100-400 ii is still a great lens though for sure
Duade, very interesting video, thank you. I have an R6 and Canon EF 100.- 400 mark 2 with both teleconverters. I’ve saved the funds for either an R5 or an RF 100 - 500 lens but I can’t make up my mind which to buy. Im not a professional,just a birder who likes to photograph birds. What would you go for? Which would improve my images the most potentially accepting the obvious importance of fieldcraft etc and that bird photography is not just about getting the best gear.
Robert, what a tough question to answer, and I don't really know what I would do. The lens in theory will stay with you for a longer time and hold its value better. But you may need a 1.4 converter for it as 500 can feel a little short but you are used to the 400mm focal range. I do wonder if its worth waiting to see if this unicorn R7 is ever going to be released. I can't help but think a 30mp APSC sensor with the AF and small improvements over the R6 will make a bigger overall difference. I guess the question to ask is what do you feel your current kit is lacking, what do you feel you need or want to improve your shots? Cheers, Duade
Duade, thank you for your very considered response. Bearing in mind spring is only about 6 weeks away in the UK (in theory at least) and with the days now noticeably lengthening and the light improving, I’ll work on my technique with the gear i have and wait to see what happens with a possible R7.
Hi can you explain why did you use this setting for "Nankeen Kestre" shot, why u are using 1600 ISO and 1/2000 during the day light. Sorry for my english :D
@@Duade thanks for the reply. That’s the same boots I wear here in Florida. They’re really comfortable but I sometimes get a bit concerned in the swamps. Love your videos but I can’t comment on them on the TV, thanks for making them. 🙂
Hi Duade! I always see you using the Sigma 150-600 or something similar, now you used this Canon L lens with teleconverter wich I have tried aswell. How do this two lenses compare to each other? Sigma with 1x4 would be perfectly comparable to this Canon with x2 teleconverter I guess.
Hi duade,great job,I also have 100-400 with 1.4 extender,how did you find the image quality with 2x was it sharp or a bit soft ?,am going to upgrade from 80d to r5.
G'day Wayne, the IQ and AF took a hit for sure, but it was useable, I think I would stick with the 1.4 the majority of the time but if you have nice light and you need reach the 2x is a great option. Cheers, Duade
Hi Duade, nice video! Maybe I missed it in the video. But what kind of/how many autofocus points can you use on R serie cameras with this setup? Only center one or more? Thnx!
I'm pretty sure you get all of the focus points on the R series with the extenders. Some lenses to reduce the coverage but I think the 100-400 kept 100% coverage. Cheers, Duade
Interesting video, you crop more than I expected, I find when the bird is a long way out they are soft. Do you post process a lot? I have recently bought an R6, the animal eye doesn't seem to work well in poor weather. I am always looking for better quality but a lot of reviews just make things up. Incidentally I use a Sigma 50-500 most of the time, can't see that the 100-100 is worth upgrading to and no way can I justify the 100-500 RF
Yes, the R5 allows a pretty decent crop. The Sigma 50-500 is not known to be the sharpest lens at 500mm. I would consider getting an RF mount lens in the future as they work so well with the R6. An affordable option to complement your zoom could be the RF800 F11. That lens will allow you to photograph those subjects that are a little further away and when you need reach. Another zoom is the RF100-400 but it does lack weather sealing. Good luck, Cheers, Duade
@@Duade I was looking at the Rf800, until I realised if I put a 2x extender on my ancient 400mm f2.8 it would be better, apart from the weight. I looked at the RF 100-400 which seemed good until I read 'a very sharp lens for the price'. At the moment I am trying to resolve a problem with Canon about the 'pin sharp' results from my 24-240. They are using woollen pins. I will probably go for the 100-400L, I have a Canon 1.4x mkI, but an independent x2 which I may change, 80% of my images lack that extra sharpness , last time I was photographing vultures it was in low cloud, which made it hard for the R6 to perform well. Browse Instagram, hibbertderek, if you are curious
Hi Duade, great video! Hope you are doing fine. I was wondering if youbcould help me, Im thorn between eos R and R6. Eos R is going really cheap these days. I know it has really slow fps. But it has 30mp, so it allows for a little bit of more crop if needed. Do you know/think if the AF is that big of a difference comparing with the R6 for wildlife general porposes or going to the zoo? Kind regards from Portugal!
Hugo, the eye af of the R6 is game changing and reason alone to choose that over the EOS R. I would choose the R6 for pure wildlife as it is so much better with FPS, Buffer AF etc. I suspect Canon will release an APSC Mirrorless body this year which might be worth waiting for as well. Cheers, Duade
I love seeing there are people out there who enjoy being alone with nature as much as I do. Sometimes it feels like I can’t relate to many but your videos remind me .. I want that lens!!
Thanks for the feedback, it sure is fun to be out there, Cheers, Duade
That's the best part of clicking!
It has been an excited photography day. Even at my home, I felt so excited. Thanks for your effort and sharing.
Mustafa, thanks for the feedback, I'm glad you are enjoying the videos. Cheers, Duade
Who could then suppose that Canon would watch this video and make its RF 200-800! Dear Duade, you are now an influencer in the world of bird photography :))
For my own edification, I compared several aspects of this setup to the Panasonic G9 mark II fitted with a Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm f/4-6.3 lens. Your system gets 45 MP full frame; the Panasonic gets similar 200-800 full-frame equivalent on a half-size (micro four thirds, or MFT) 25 MP sensor. I'm well aware that there are many other technical spec differences in these two systems, but the G9 mark II is getting rave reviews for upgrades in many components, including eye-detection autofocus. Summary: If one is already heavily invested in Canon L-serious glass and other Canon peripherals, then going with the R series bodies and adapter makes sense (or if one really needs 45 MP). But if one is just looking to gear up for walk-about wildlife photography and you don't need all those pixels, then the Panasonic deserves a hard look. The weight and cost savings on big telephotos are considerable.
Detailed numbers below (costs & specks gleaned from B&H's web).
Canon R5 body: $2,999 (sale) - $3,899 (regular price); Weight: 738 g
Canon EF 100-400 II f/4.5-5.6L lens: $2399; wt: 1640 g; Length at max extension: 193 mm
Canon Extender EF 2X III (2-stop penalty)$429; wt. 325 g; L=52 mm
Canon Mount Adapter EF-EOS R$129; 110 g; 24 mm
Totals for the 4-piece Canon system: $5,956 (sale price on body) to $6,856; wt: 2813 g (6.2 pounds); L (including extension & adapter): 269 mm; Max aperture~ f/9 - f/11
Panasonic G9 Mark II: $1,898; wt: 575 g
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm f/4-6.3 lens: $1,798; wt: 985 g; L at max extension: 263 mm
Totals for the Panasonic system: $3,696; wt: 1560 g (3.4 pounds); Lens length: 263 mm; Max aperture: f/4-6.3
Great example of how to change that last background to green, and show what it's like to be out there trying to get photo's of sometimes uncooperative birds! Thanks
Callline, yes it is handy with the flipscreen, thanks for the comment, Cheers, Duade
A very timely video Duade i’ve just recently picked up the first series push pull EF100mm-400 and 2x teleconverter, and now I’m waiting for the rain to stop up here in the tropics so I can go out Birding.
Good luck, the 2x does impact AF and IQ so you will need nice light to get it to work at its best. Also try shooting at f/13 which helped increase sharpness slightly. Cheers, Duade
Thanks for another amazing video! Great material for procrastinating while I should study for my uni exams😂
Jindřich, thanks for taking break and watching the video, I am sure the study will be all the better for it. :-)
Beautiful shots of that lovely little kestrel Duade 👏👏👏
Thanks Julian, it was a fun session, Cheers, Duade
Top video. I knew someone who made a floating hide to get close to nesting Great Crested Grebes. I have waded into the water up to my armpits to take photos of nesting Cormorants. Everything was working well until I got a cramp in my leg due to the cold water. I almost dropped my gear into the water.
Pauline, yes, a floating hide would be a good idea, I have fallen in the water with my gear before, not fun, killed my camera unfortunately. Cheers, Duade
I didn't know about the different coloured eyes for the galahs as the way to tell which is male and female. I've learnt something! Some great kestrel shots. So cool to have seen it with some food.
Thanks Denise, yes you have to see them up close to notice the eye colour. Cheers, Duade
Hi again, never mind my Grebe-question. I checked the facts myself. Not introduced, the distribution was *way* bigger than I knew!
Yes, they do appear to have a wide distribution which is great for us as they are so beautiful. Cheers, Duade
Really enjoying your videos. Good to see the full image.
Scott, I'm glad to hear it, Cheers, Duade
Great video again. Loved the in flight shots too.
Thanks May, I appreciate it, Cheers, Duade
I enjoyed the video very much - thanks. I have been using the exact same rig as you and am
more than happy with the 2x teleconverter. I cannot see any of the image softness that is supposed to be a problem with teleconverters. In fact I am finding it super sharp. Also here in the dark rainforest of north Queensland I have to use very high ISO but I have found that processing the raw file in DXO Pure Raw strips out all the noise and sharpens the feather detail remarkably. I think the camera and lens correction that DXO applies may be part of the reason for this remarkable detail and sharpness.
Grant, thanks for sharing your experience, I was surprised by the results to be fair. It does take a bit of a hit in IQ, AF but you are doubling your focal length. Cheers, Duade
Wow 👍🏻☺👍🏻 great pictures! 🦅🐦 It was also nice to see a test of this lens - TC combo with the R5. Results look very good! Thanks for sharing this 🙋♂️
LG it is my pleasure, Cheers, Duade
Great video as always Duade..
Thanks Tel, I appreciate it, Cheers, Duade
You always came up with amazing video. You are really good in what you do. ❤️❤️❤️
Thank you, you are too kind, Cheers, Duade
I haven't had my heart get a turbo boast watching utube for a long time, but when that kestrel landed on the stump the adrenalin kicked in. Pity he didn't stay but hey it worked out for you in the end.
Yes, me too, it would have been a great shot had it stayed there. Cheers, Duade
What a fine video, lots of variety for you. Pity about the grebes. Thanks so much for your time and effort
Thanks for the comment, yes, I am still chasing a good photo of the Grebes, I need to go to Western Australia for that. Cheers, Duade
Thanks for sharing Duade
Harold, it is my pleasure, Cheers, Duade
Love your videos Duade.
Thanks Joan, I appreciate the feedback, Cheers, Duade
Dude you won't believe it! I have a Canon R5 camera and yesterday I bought a Canon EF 100-400mm II lens and I was thinking about the results with the 2X III teleconverter. This video came just in time.
Congrats on the lens, the 2x works but the IQ and AF do take a hit so I would not suggest using all the time, only in the best light. The 1.4 III converter works much better. Good luck, Cheers, Duade
@@Duade thank you.🍻
Another great video! I noticed you seemed to forget about the pelicans. I would had done the exact same thing. Pelican vs raptor, raptor wins everytime. I was playing with my 90d with the sigma 150 600 with 1.4 on it yesterday. No trouble with the focus. I haven't put them on the computer yet. They were just a few from off my back yard feeders. Looks like you well on your way into summer. Hoping to hit low 50's today put here in winter brings rain. Have a great day!
Guy, yes, I got distracted by the Raptor and I missed the Pelicans, in hindsight I would have liked a shot of them but the Raptor got the priority. Great to hear you are enjoying the lens. Cheers, Duade
Great video & the photos are amazing. Lot of pro tips in this episode alone. Thanks Duade, cheers.
Jordan, thanks for the feedback, I'm glad you enjoyed it, Cheers, Duade
We get a lot of birds on our place but because I'm not out taking photos as such I miss out on most of them. We get Peregrine Falcons up under our verandah, I've been inside and seen one flying past the kitchen window by the time I've grabbed the camera its gone. I've been lucky to get a few wedge tail shots. White winged fairy wrens everywhere but do you think I can ever spot the males, not very often and its just a flash. Good to see even you have trouble sometimes approaching birds, makes me feel a bit better. Once again very informative and interesting, love watching. PS my Sigma 150-600 has arrived but so far all I've taken is cat and horse photos, but I'm happy with that so far.
Great to hear Lisa, sounds
Like some great birds, the male WWFW is truly stunning and I really want some more shots of that species. Good to hear the lens is performing well. Cheers, Duade 👍
Would you believe just been on a hay run and I managed to bag a few shots of some corellas drinking from a dam with the Sigma. Just on the side of the main road. Was terrified they were going to fly away, couldn't believe my luck.
fabulous video, enjoyed your beautiful adventure, thanks so much.
I am glad you enjoyed it, thanks for the ongoing support, Cheers, Duade
Enjoy your video's . Just for the heck of it, I would of flipped crop mode on with the 2X on to see what you would of got with the Grebes way out . I do it quite often with the the 1.4 on the 100-400II & 150-600 and get surprisingly good results., of course we are talking in good light like you had.
Thanks for the comment, the final cropped image was likely very close to the 1.6 crop mode. I wish Canon allowed you to have crop mode in the viewfinder but record the full frame image like some other brands. This way the bird is bigger in the viewfinder but you don't lose any pixels. Cheers, Duade
Great video! Lot of useful tips at a practical level. Very interesting how you work to get close and get the right angle.
Sverre, I am glad you enjoyed it and the tips were helpful. Cheers, Duade
Great video as always, but I believe there were two very peeved pelicans for not featuring!! Always guessed your boots were for snake protection and would be interested in knowing what they are and where you got them, as they don't seem to be just ordinary gumboots. Performance of the kit was very acceptable, with the performance of the R5 really shining through. Exceptional shot of the kestrel fanned out. Well done!!
Chris, I was actually a little annoyed at myself I didnt take a shot of the Pelicans but the raptor got my focus. The boots are Muck Boots Muckmuster High which were given to me for a birthday gift, I got them at a local camping store. Cheers, Duade
Love your content Duade 👌
Great video Duade, looks like a very enjoyable session. Good tips about approaching in stages and taking shots as you go. The photos look great too, although a bit bright on my iPad. Mobile bird photography like that is very appealing.
Lachlan, thanks for the feedback I appreciate it, Cheers, Duade
Hi Duade, great video as usual. Do you ever use a camouflage suit when photographing birds? Is that even necessary in your experience? Thank you.
Yes, I have used blinds and camo for when I am waiting for a bird, or a bird is flighty. It likely helps for certain birds that are flighty, it can get pretty hot under blinds here in summer and I like to move around. It might be worth getting a suit and trying, I guess. Cheers, Duade
Wow that is absolutely fantastic, normally with the use of TC there is a noticeable drop in IQ.but that combination on the R5 produces some stunning results.
There was a drop in IQ with the TC for sure but the R5 seems to get the best from this combo. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade it is definitely a combo to keep in mind. Not sure what state you are in, but years ago before I got into Photography I spent some time near Hunter Valley NSW. Will be going back once the borders are open to tourists. But until then I will be keeping an eye out for your videos.
A great day out Duade. Love the kestrel encounter. I did wonder about the wellies, hadn't thought about snakes, hardly see any here in the UK. As I was watching this video I was expecting you to pull out a ghillie suit or jacket from your backpack. Do you use one on occasions?
Thanks Roger, it was a fun outing. I don't often use a Camo suit, I'm wondering if I should try one out. Cheers, Duade 👍
Nice video! Good work getting some nice Kestrel shots. I have never gotten a decent pic of one. Just good enough pics for ID a couple of times. I finally got the RF 100-500 and will likely end up with both extenders for that. At some point I would like to try the new RF 100-400 with the extenders. That might end up being a super light and flexible package.
Rod, congrats on the lens, I am sure you will love it. I hope to try the RF100-400 soon so will be able to share my thoughts on that lens. Cheers, Duade
Great video, Duade! There are no crocs in that water, are there? LOL. Australia has to be one of the most dangerous places on earth. Well, the first question which came to mind and obviously someone already beat me to it is how does the EF 100-400mm + 2x TC compare to the RF 800mm f/11? Do you think the 800mm will be sharper? Also, what happens when you use the 2x TC on the EF 100-400mm as in does it also shrink the focusing area like the 800mm too?
Thanks Alex, yeah, no crocs down here in the south thankfully. For pure reach, AF, IS and IQ I think the RF800 performs slightly better. But the 6m MFD, fixed focal length and the smaller AF area are its limitations. I was surprised that the 100-400 keeps the AF coverage even with extenders.
If I had to choose one lens, I would go with the 100-400 as its just more versatile and I would likely use the 1.4 extender most of the time. But if you were on a budget and didn't have any wildlife lenses and wanted reach the RF800 is hard to beat. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Thanks, Duade. Well, I am already using the Sigma 150-600mm on my R5. I am planning to move over to Sony anyway, but I am waiting for the A1a or A1 II with the updated higher res LCD screen. So, I was just wondering whether I should just get the RF 800mm f/11 just to play with for the time being until the new A1 arrives when I trade in all my Canon gear. But, yea that shrunk down focusing area is a bit of a bummer really.
Hi Duade, love your work. In these isolated areas where you might not have any phone signal always worth carrying a PLB beacon in case of an emergency, snake bite, fall, heart problem. Just in case ,cheap insurance.
Thanks Frank, great idea, might have to pick one up, Cheers, Duade
Great video, really helpful to see you work things out in the field, things that I myself struggle with such as birds flying off, not being able to get close enough and angle of view. Locally the trees are really high so cant get shots when birds are in the canopy, so I go to certain spots a little further away with smaller trees but these areas tend to be more open, so I have trouble approaching birds, good to see it can just be a bit of luck, sometimes the bird wont fly off sometimes it will.
Kurtis, yes it can be very difficult approaching wild birds and luck plays a big part. I think that is why water spots are so good as you get the birds coming to you down low. Cheers, Duade
great video , i had this combo with R6 for over a year and enjoyed it very much. you might miss some flying shots but amazing for field shots. looks like with R5 even flying shots are easy and good. then i bought RF 100-500 and struggling with focus lock many times..
BIF is always a struggle even with the R5 and 100-500, I struggle at times also. Cheers, Duade
Really enjoy your walkabout videos. Seeing you have some of the same issues (birds keep moving away from you) is positive reinforcement, lol! I have a the R5 with the RF100-500 and 2x converter though I rarely use the 2x. Only on the brightest days and clear air does it seem to provide the best images and sometimes the 300mm minimum focal length is just too much. I don’t like switching lenses in the field. I recently had a gorgeous day with near perfect light but with the 2x on my shots of a rarely-spotted male Bufflehead duck with its mate were not so clear. I managed so salvage a few through the magic of software but would rather have had less reach and more clarity, even with fewer pixels, than what I ended up with. Thanks for another great video! Oh, and one of the details I like best about them is the fact that you show the raw image as well as the final edit!
Thanks for sharing your experience and I have had the same experience with the 2x on the 100-500, cropping seems to be the way to go with that lens. Cheers, Duade
Thanks or the video! I dug out my 1.4x iii and tried it on the R7 and it nails focus something it couldn't do with my 90D!
Great to hear Jeffrey, the mirrorless bodies handle the converters much better than DSLRs, Cheers, Duade
Ended up returning my 100-400 MK2, focal length just isn't enough for smaller birds, or even average sized birds for just walking around... Nice lens, just lacks reach.
Totally agree on FF cameras, 400 is just a little too short. On an APSC it is fine at 640 FOV but the 600 zooms just give you that little more reach. The 1.4 extender does work well on the R5 and is another option. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Yeah, I bought one as a secondary to my 600 f4 but everytime I picked up that 100-400, just felt massive disappointment with the reach for even having a little stroll around lol. I'll just use my 70-200 for my random walks. :)
Thanks again for sharing your amazing performance. I wanted to test 100-400 ll with Canon R6 once then I thought, it maybe not good functioned. But seeing your performance with Canon R5 i would like to test with R6😀 💪 By the way I used your coupon code for buying Topaz Denoise through your link.Thank so much for getting discount. 🙏
thanks for the support, yes the 100-400 will work very well on the R6, I will be testing the RF100-400 soon so you may want to see that review before buying the EF100-400. Cheers, Duade
Oh almost forgot, if youput concrete in the bottomof a bucket to hold a post for a perch, its heavy , you can do the same thing with a tube of crazy foam from Amazon.. Light as a feather.
Thanks Chris, great tip, Cheers, Duade
Great walkabout video. I use the same lens. Had a aftermarket 2x TC but was using it on an RP. I have a R6 and am thinking of a TC again but will probably hold off until getting the RF 100-500. Also, I have my bright white lens wrapped in a nice camo. One less thing to stick out to animals saying look at me!!
Chris, thanks, you will enjoy the 100-500, yes, I need to look at getting camo for a few of my lenses. Cheers, Duade
This a great. I just upgraded from the T6i APS-C camera to a 6D Markii full frame. I had a 70-300 USM for the T6i that was awesome for bird photography. It had an effective focal length of 480mm. For now I have a 80-200mm Magic Drainpipe and it just doesnt' cut the mustard for long range stuff at all. Basically, I went from a 480mm focal length to a 200mm focal length. Looking now at getting a 100-400 L with an extender to get the range back. I was thinking to get the 1.4 extender, but in good light that 2.0 is MONEY!! I'm also possibly considering getting rid of the 6D Mark ii for the new R10 or R7 APS-C camera. I'm not much of a portrait guy and after using both APS-C and full frame cameras, I kind of like what an APS-C camera can do.
My EF 500 II paired with a 2X III produces exceptional results, especially with the R5. Even my Tammy 150-600 G2 is quite good with the 2X.... not as good as the big white... and no AF.... live view might work..... Been a while since I tried... I doubt it would work at all for birds in flight....
Roger, yes it can work well and the 500 II is a wonderful lens. Cheers, Duade
Another great video mate. I'm learning so much from watching. Thank you mate.. I love your DJI pocket on the camera for video I'm guessing. 👊👊👊🤟🤟🤟🤟👍👍👍 great work .
Mikey
Mikey, thanks for the feedback, yes, I use it for some video from the camera. Cheers, Duade
Excellent photos!
Thanks for the video.
I currently own a 5Dmiii and 100-400ii. I am considering to upgrade to a R7 which is cropped.
What would be your thought about having an extender in an APS-C? I feel that it would be more useful in a full frame camera but I have 0 experience with extenders
I own the 100-400 mk ii with the 1.4 mk iii, and because of this vid I got interested in the 2x iii for more reach. But the comment I’m reading on the 2x on the Canon site say it will not autofocus on the 100-400 but you don’t seem to be having problems with the AF. They say you can use the LCD but not the EVF. You seem o using both. The 1.4 AF oddly works fine. Any probs on your end. Thank you.
It is a little confusing but the 2x will work on any Canon Mirrorless RF mount camera with the adapter. So, the R6/R5 will AF with the 2x and 100-400 which you saw in this video. DSLR's such as the 90D or 5D mark 4 will not be able to autofocus with a 2x as the max aperture for DSLR AF is f/8 and this lens becomes an f/11 with a 2x. I hope that helps. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Thank you for the explanation. I called Canon about this and they said that it will work with DSLR is like the 90 D and the 5D in live view mode. Since Canon mirror less cameras are in lice view mode all the time it should work as you said. Do you think that the two times extender is worth buying for the 100-400 versus the 100-500?
Hi Duade, really enjoying your videos. Thanks for all the hard work you put into them. I am curious as to your take on the image quality between the EF 100-400 w/ 2x tele versus the Rf 800mm f/11.
I’m interested in this question too if it hasn’t been addressed, I have a feeling having used to f11 before it will be sharper, but if the 100-400 + TC could serve double duty that would awesome… but I am doubtful based on the example shots and other vids I’ve seen that the 100-400 + tele @ 800 could beat out the 800f11 in most wildlife scenarios
Bob, the RF800 f/11 is better then the 100-400 + 2x at 800, it is just a little more consistent, the AF is slightly quicker, IS is better. But there are some downsides to the RF800, its 6m MFD makes it very difficult to photograph certain birds if they get too close. You have that fixed focal length and aperture. If I could only have one lens, I would go with the 100-400 and converters for flexibility, but if I just needed pure reach for birds the 800 f/11 would be it. I tend to think you really need a zoom to complement the 800 prime. So maybe the RF100-400 is an option. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Thanks Duade
You answered my question about the 100-400 mm and the 2x teleconverter. Wonder how that arrangement would work with the R as the R5 is a bit more than I want to commit to. Thanks again for a real-world bird photography experience!
Robert, I am sure it would work well on the R, the AF might not be as good but it should work. It may also be worth seeing if Canon do release the long rumoured APSC mirrorless body also. Cheers, Duade
Thanks to you, now I know many birds of Australia!
Well done!
and thanks for the comment, Cheers, Duade
Hi Duade. Very nice video. I’m a bird photographer but I don’t have the budget to buy gear like the R5 or a 100-400 m2, so I’m using a 75-300mm and I’m planning to buy a sigma 100-400. I know you can’t simply try every lens there is, but, if it’s possible for you, could you do a video trying bird photography with the 75-300 to see what you can get? Maybe you could even make a video trying very cheap gear vs your current gear, just an idea though. Anyway, amazing content, you’re my favorite UA-camr on this platform.
Yes, that would make for an interesting video, I don't have access to that lens at the moment. I did make the Canon 40D and Sigma 150-600C which can be picked up for $600 used USD. ua-cam.com/video/0Oam6cRR__0/v-deo.html Cheers, Duade
@@Duade yeah i considered the Sigma 150-600C but I think the 100-400 will be a better option for me because I almost never shoot on a tripod and the 150-600 is quite heavy
@@Leo_Santisteban Yes, the weight does get a bit heavy after a while. Cheers, Duade
Awesome video. Is it good for sports photography?
The lens on its own would be but with a converter it is probably a bit slow for sports as you would need a lot of light. Cheers, Duade
"Now we are cooking with gas." I have not come across that since I left the UK for the USA over 20 years ago.
John, it is funny how these sayings come out without conscious thought, I must have picked it up from my folks in NZ growing up, not sure. Cheers, Duade
Love your channel. I watch and rewatch many episodes!
Do you feel this lens and 2x combo performs better than the Sigma/Tamron 150-600 lenses on Canon mirrorless?
Thanks, that is a great question, my personal feeling is the 2x is a good light only option and has an impact on IQ and AF, the 1.4 is far better and does not appear to suffer anywhere near as much. I think the Sigma is sharper then with converters but it does have some AF issues at times. Cheers, Duade
I would love so this the same video but with the 1.4 converter and the r7 just to know if the AF and the sharpness still good
Be sure to check out this video I do exactly that, Cheers, Duade ua-cam.com/video/qv3TxfZTttE/v-deo.html
G'day Duade, thanks for yet another awesome testament of birding passion 😀
As you know, moving with this lens from an APS-C to the R6, I'm still craving for more reach, even with the 1.4x. And given the 100-500 is financially out of reach, I am torn between getting the 2x or the 800/11 as a next step.
Last week a certain German called Jan labelled this lens with the 2x a "bit hit and miss" .. and he almost pulled me over to the 800/11 camp even while I dislike the 6m MFD and lack of weather sealing. However this video makes it a again a much tougher call. Or maybe it proves you have much more stable hands and skills than him (which we should never tell him, heheh) ??
Nice trick to use the LCD for a nicer background !
And I mostly love you flight shot of the Kestrel !! My best ever shot with 70D and Tamron 16-300 (2 weeks before I got my 100-400ii) was a male kestrel, sitting only 26m away from me at eye-level on top of a tree which started much lower than my path. If only you had a ladder with you to get eye level with your female kestrel 😉
Werner, It is a tough call but the RF800 f11 is better then this combo at 800. The IQ, AF and IS are just better, but it has its weaknesses as you have pointed out. One consideration is the RF800 F11 and the RF100-400, that combo would cover most situations very well. I hope to try the RF100-400 shortly and will give my thoughts. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade hmm, with its weight and price, the RF100-400 could be very compelling for beginners .. but it badly lacks weather sealing (which would hurt me more on an versatile zoom compared to a dedicated 800/11) and I would be hugely surprised if the RF100-400 would beat the EF100-400ii on IQ. Otherwise Canon would not have raised the price of the 100-400ii with 25% since I bought it just 13 months ago .. a shootout between the RF and EF 100-400 would be very interesting though ..
@@WernerBirdNature Werner, sorry I forgot you had an EF100-400 II, that is a beautiful lens and is superior to the RF version no doubt. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade heheh, if the RF version would be better, then I should quickly swap my EF and get the RF version plus the 800/11 for that resale value 😛
based upon what I have, the 800/11 costs more than twice the TC2x .. and both options have their limitations ..
Great time.
At about 14:45 while your trying to capture the Pipit on the stump the vid shows your lens hood. A small hatch open on the top of the hood, what does the hatch do?
BTW. Based on your comments I have started the wheels turning to purchase a 100-400 ii for my 7dii. Tha KS for the input
Hope it's ok if I help out here. The hatch in the hood is used to access and adjust a circular polarizer without removing the lens hood. Also, I have this lens on a 7Dii and it works very well. With my older Sigma 1.4x TC autofocus still works, but center point only.
@@Colt-4570 thanks very much. Good to know
Yes, Colt is correct, though I don't use filters, so I don't really use that feature. The 100-400 is a great lens and should work well on the 7D. Cheers, Duade
Hi Duade, Great video, love the in the field ones. I bought the 100-400mm Mk11 when it first came out and 1.4 extender lives on it all the time but obviously can’t use 2X on 5D4. Lack of light here in the UK is a constant challenge being stuck on F8, also have a 500mm F4 Mk11 Lens which I will never part with and I’m totally satisfied with the results I get but I am saving for an R5 because the 560mm focal length I get with the 100-400mm is a bit short. Just wish Canon would bring out a 200-600mm like the Sony option even the 100-500 option doesn’t seem worth all the expense over what I already have. I do like the freedom of walking around with the 100-400mm set up on my Black Rapid Strap. 100-500mm plus 1.4 extender for a walk around set up with R5 seems my only option at the moment. R5 to start with and pray they come up with 200-600mm 🙏😁 . You definitely have a gift with the in the field videos your Passion for it shines through.
Regards Chris.
Chris, thanks for sharing your experience, I understand your dilemma and I wish we had a 200-600 as well. I think if the R7 is a mini R3 paired with the 100-500 will be the way to go as the 1.6 crop will give you 800 FOV which should be plenty. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade R7 could be the answer, but not sure I would want to move away from Full Frame Camera I’ve grown to love my 5D4 set up and the only reason for change is the prospect of no new EF lenses likely to be developed. So going forward will to be Mirrorless when they sort the focusing issues.
@@chrispowell2126 hey Chris curious why you can’t use the 2X on the 5Div ? Thanks
@@unknownKnownunknowns HI Steven, with 500mm F4 mk 2 Lens you can but definitely notice drop off in picture quality. With the 100-400 mk 2 Lens you are limited to F8 with 1.4 extender, with 2X extender I don’t think the auto focus works and there just isn’t enough light.
@@chrispowell2126 thank you Chris
How long were you out there ?
Great video
Great video. What did you think of the image quality afterwards. I found this combo quite hit and miss.
Thanks mate, yep IQ takes a hit for sure, but I did have nice light which helped. If I owned a 100-400 and needed more reach this would be a useful option. Cheers, Duade
Hi Duade, love your stuff. Are the friends of the regent honeyeater hats for sale anywhere? id love one for myself :) Cheers.
Jack, thanks for the feedback, I got given the hat as a gift from Trust for Nature, I am unsure if they are selling them or just had a batch made for their supporters. Cheers, Duade
Not sure if you’ve covered this in any of your videos but have you ever tried the canon 400 f4.0 ii lens? Any comments? No zoom (of course) but you’re shooting at the long end mostly it seems anyway. An extra stop of light. And it’s lighter and shorter. Of course significantly more expensive.
Yes, I would love to try that lens, I have held it before but never used it. As you day very expensive. Cheers, Duade 👍
That pipit shot is like 80% of my bird photo's 😂Even with 800mm I still rarely get close to the blighters.
you need a 150 600 my friend .. Good video thank you !!!
Jean, yes, the 150-600 is a great option and is another consideration. Cheers, Duade
Have you tried the RF 800 f11, which is the same at the long end as the combo used here ? I love using it and its so light.
G'day Dave, yes, I have been fortunate enough to use the RF800 F11 and I had fun using it. I did a video with it here ua-cam.com/video/Kor_MZw1EN4/v-deo.html I have been asked a few times if this combo works so thought I would try it out. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade I also have the 100-400 II and using on my R6 and R. Both lenses are very good on the new R system. Other might like to try it shooting the Moon on a clear night. f/11 then try 200 either side, 1/200 iso 200 with IBIS and Len Stabilizer. Blows me a way each time I do it. When you send the sunshine back to us in the UK I will grab some of our birds, once with wings also lol. I wish you well.
If I’d have known You were near Bendigo I would have popped LOL. Will you be trying the RF 100-400 I’d be interested in your thoughts. Also apparently works will teleconverter.
Would be great to see more water in Eppalock still looks pretty low.
Paul, I was there for one afternoon as I had work the next day in Castlemaine so popped in for a session. I hope to try the RF100-400 soon so keep an eye out. I have not really done any birding in Bendigo itself, any places worth checking out? Cheers, Duade
Hey Duade, I had the 100-400 mk1 and 2X, at the time on a 20D then 40D: never really got any worthwhile keepers. The Mk2 and R5 sure have moved things on a bit! I'm still holding out for the RF100-500 though, and will probably get a 2X with that.
Yes they have come a long way, I remember using the original 300 2.8 with a 2x and I thought the AF was broken it was that slow to focus. The mirrorless bodies just seem to work much better with extenders. The RF100-500 is a wonderful lens and worth saving for. Good luck, Cheers, Duade
It seems to me that the theme was: You spot a bird and chase after it.
I’m certainly no expert, but the advice I always hear from experts is: Don’t chase after the birds. Instead try to predict where they’ll eventually land, get there before the bird, wait and be ready to shoot when it arrives.
Lau, thanks for the comment, there are numerous different ways to photograph birds and I did a video showing the 5 common ways which includes the method you suggest. ua-cam.com/video/X_3sNmoGP60/v-deo.html
As this was my first time visiting this location, I had no idea where the birds might land, and it would be hard to create a UA-cam video of me sitting and waiting and possibly not getting anything.
By walking and shooting it allowed me to get some photos I may not have otherwise captured.
At the end of the day, you should adopt whichever method you enjoy and brings you the most success. Cheers, Duade
Appreciate the vid. I run the 100-400 mark ii on my 5Div for photographing eagles and the added reach is always compelling to see. Have you done any sort of comparison on the sharpness of the images when the lens is native vs with the 2x? I had an earlier version of the 2x that I would pair with my 300F4L with marginal success. Because of this, I've sold the converter and added a Tamron G2 150-600 to the bag (which I'm very happy with).
The 2x does impact AF and IQ and is not something I would use unless I had very nice light. The R5 does perform well and much better than DSLRs with TC which is interesting. The 150-600 is the better option on a DSLR. Cheers, Duade
Thanks for the video. I am interested in your tracking settings for the R5. I only dabble in wildlife photography and have traditionally photographed surfing, cricket and other sports. Since the introduction of motorsport tracking with the firmware 1.5 for the R5, I have not managed to get the similar results that I was getting with FW1.4 and earlier for sport. As I spend more time shooting wildlife, any settings for tracking stickiness or acceleration etc and the tracking modes you prefer for BIF would be great if you care to share. Regards,
Kurt, sorry to hear you have found 1.5 a step backwards. I have it set to Animal Eye AF, and use very similar settings to Jan in his video ua-cam.com/video/-nnRqgXu7QI/v-deo.html&ab Cheers, Duade
Thanks that's great information and great photos! Do you feel that the speed of the autofocus of that lens on the R5 is considerable faster without the extender?
Great video! I have a Canon 7DMarkll with the Canon100-400. How do you think the 2X converter would work with this set-up? By the way snakes were you worried about running into?
James, the autofocus wont work with the 100-400 and the 7D with a 2x unfortunately, you could try a 1.4 which would make your lens f8, but on the 7D I think you have reduced AF points, the AF slows down and IQ does take a hit. I would only use that combo in very good light otherwise the lens is better on its own and cropping. I am mainly concerned about Brown Snakes, Cheers, Duade
Duade. Seen all your videos and I like the honesty and simple to understand items which led me to buy the R5. One question though. What Case do you use when you shot the kestrel? On AF? Case 1-4? Also did you tweak the tracking and accel/decel? And Electronic shutter or EFCS? I still have difficulty focusing in the viewfinder with a bird in flight and I have the 100-400 with 1.4x combo. Thanks
Thanks for the comment, I setup my camera very similar to Jans video which you can check out. I shoot with Electronic Shutter most of the time. With BIF it is very tricky, you really need to prefocus roughly on the focal plane you expect the bird to be, so I will usually focus on the ground or a tree then lift the camera to the sky of in the direction of the bird. The camera does a pretty good job of finding the subject using eye tracking. In saying all this BIF is probably the most difficult types of photography and there is a lot of luck and patience. Cheers, Duade - Jans Video: ua-cam.com/video/-nnRqgXu7QI/v-deo.html
Hi Duade, I've been on a binge of your videos recently, especially when I was considering picking up the R6 mkII. I currently shoot with an 80D + EF 100-400 IS II and was wondering how it fared on the R6 mkII. This video has helped me consider maybe picking up an EF 2x extender instead of splashing cash on a new RF 800mm f11 lens as a sensible, cost effective choice. I'm really looking forward to photographing winter migratory birds with my new R6 mkII, so thanks a lot for your videos :)
Also loved the way you're walking around the tree, trying to find a better angle. I've been slowly getting better at that myself and can't wait to get back on the field this month
Late reply but the R6M2 and that lens is a nice setup. I do miss the extra crop sensor distance but the pictures with the FF camera are so nice.
Duade I only recently found your channel and I found your style very watchable, pleasing and informative I am basically an amateur aircraft photographer at airshows and the such and only recently started bird photography because I had all the gear lying otherwise unused due to the covid restrictions on life. can you tell me why does the 2x extender / lens combination autofocus work with the R5 but not with DSLR?
Wally, thanks for the comment and I am glad you found the channel and are getting into bird photography. DSLR and Mirrorless use completely different AF systems.
The DSLR needs to send light up to the optical viewfinder and to the AF sensor at the bottom of the camera. Basically, at a max aperture of f11 (400 5.6 x2 = 800 f11) there is not enough light for a DSLR to work accurately and the viewfinder starts to get dark.
On a mirrorless body there is no optical viewfinder or separate AF sensor, all the light hits the sensor, and the sensor does the focusing based off the image on the sensor. Mirrorless bodies can AF even up to a max aperture of f/22 which is crazy when compared to a DSLR.
I hope that helped, Cheers, Duade
@@Duade thanks very much for that cheers wally
Another great video. I have everything but the 2x .. Maybe I should buy one. I love the 800 but every now and then in Maine (like yesterday) a Moose or a deer pops into view and with the 800 I am often too close to get a full body shot. This would be a great solution. Looks like the sharpness is comparative at 800mm ?? Now off to go chase the Steller's Sea Eagle which is 30 miles from me at the moment !!
Dan, sounds like you are having fun. The 800 primes do have better IQ, AF then this combo, it is probably not something you would want to use all the time to be fair but can be used if you really need the reach. But as a versatile all around lens it is very good. I will be trying the RF100-400 soon and the RF100-500 is another option. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade BTW I found the Steller's Sea Eagle in Boothbay harbor this morning. Got off a few shots but he or she was 1800 feet away but still more than good enough to identify. Talk about RARE!!!
@@DanBetty Great to hear Dan, what a highlight, I just read about it on ebird, sounds like the bird is on massive journey. Cheers, Duade
Love your videos. loads of useful information. I have the Canon 7D Mk II and Canon 100-400 is II. Just purchased the Canon 2X III Extender but it seems that AF does not work with this combination. Do you know of a way to overcome this?
G'day, unfortunately no DSLR's will autofocus with a max aperture higher than f/8, when using a 2x on the 100-400 it becomes a 200-800 f/11 as you lose two stops of light. So it starts at 400 5.6, with a 1.4 you lose 1 stop so 560 f/8 then 2 stops with the 2x is 800 f/11. It will work on a mirrorless so when you upgrade to the R7 or other mirrorless body the converter will work due to the different autofocus system. Cheers, Duade
Very engaging video!! I was shooting at my laptop screen, when the kestrel flew up from the trunk, and again when I saw the mouse (ok bird ;)) :) Btw, do you think changing the perspective in post, when shot at a for you unacceptable angle, would do the trick?
Thanks Rex, I am glad you enjoyed it. To be honest I have not tried changing the perspective in post, it could work. Cheers, Duade
‘ Darn, I missed it’. My usual bird photography comment.
Michelle, yes, I find myself saying the same thing many times. Cheers, Duade
Great video! Thank you! I also got similar results using that combination as well as with my canon M6 Mark Ii although in good light and high shutter speeds for best results. Thanks for your help last year in choosing this lens over the RF 100-500mm as a more affordable option. 😊 I also get to use the Speed Booster with it in low light with is a nice option that you don’t have in low light. 😉
James, yes if you already own the 100-400 it does work well until you can afford the RF100-500. The IQ and AF do take a hit but gives you plenty of focal length in exchange. Cheers, Duade
Hello James, what is the Speed Booster, please?
@@GrantPhillipsmastamak It’s a focal reducer for crop sensors or full frame mirrorless camera that have a crop mode. Does the opposite that of a tele converter. You can find out more details on UA-cam if you wish.
@@Duade Thank you for all of your videos, I enjoy your knowledge and passion! If you were using a 1.4x converter instead of the 2x, do you think the AF would be faster? I have an R6 and EF 100-400 Mk2 also but would like more focal length so I'm looking at how best to achieve that. Thank you
Hi Duade, Can I ask you how have you made fitting an EF extender on a R5 ring adapter for EF lens?
Very nice, Tnx for taking us along. I have this combo and also the 1.4x and for versatility and size it is very good but IQ and AF speed n accuracy takes a hit. Were you using the electronic or the mechanical shutter? I just wanted to say put hood the other way around so that the window/hatch for the filter is at the bottom so even if you forget it open/or don’t have time to close less ambient light gets in. After using this lens for several years I noticed it makes a difference and in actual fact once you get used to it it’s better cause if you use a CP you can turn it without taking your eye from the viewfinder/using the same hand that holds the barrel of the lens (assuming you have long enough and dexterous fingers) as I noticed in a couple of your video clips the lens hood windows/hatch was at the top and open. On days I know I’m not using a CP I just put a bit of gaffer tape to make sure the lens hood hatch stays closed.
Dimitris, thanks for the detailed response and thanks for the tip re the hood. I was using electronic shutter during this shoot. I agree that AF speed and IQ take a hit with the converter, it is just amazing this combo even works on a mirrorless body. Cheers, Duade
does af work with the loss of light, 2 stops i think with the 2x? Think you really need a f2.8 lens to get the best from it, a 300mm usually. I use the 1.4x and it really struggles to focus on anything moving. I rarely use it as the loss of image quality and shutter speed isnt worth it, and upping the res in photoshop generally gives a better result anyway
Hi Duade, I discovered your channel a few days ago and have now watched many of your videos, including the one with your back-story. Thanks for producing them - they are really interesting and full of great information. Canon are about to announce their EOS R7 camera, presumably a replacement for the 7D II which I have at the moment. I'm tossing up whether to buy one of them once they are released or go full-hog and buy a R5 - my wife is OK with that! I'm into travel and landscape photography mostly but also like macro photography and portraiture. Any thoughts on the R7 vs the R5?
Ken, the R5 is the better all around camera for landscape and macro etc as the 45mp sensor is beautiful. The R7 would be great for small birds. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Thanks Duade, appreciate your reply. Looks like it's going to be an R5 and your response backs up what I was thinking anyway. Might keep the 7D II also though as the resale value isn't great here in NZ.
Very nice 👍.
Just curious about how this setup compares to long a prime like the 600 f5.6 or the RF 800 f11?
John, the RF800 f11 is better than the 100-400 at 800 with the 2x, the AF, IQ and IS are just more accurate and reliable. In saying that it has its shortcomings with the 6m MFD, reduced AF coverage and fixed aperture and focal length.
If you already own the 100-400 then a 2x is a great addition and option should you need reach.
Ideally, I think you would need some sort of zoom to complement it like the RF100-400 perhaps. I have no used a 600 5.6 but that would be a nice focal length and speed. Cheers, Duade
Great video, Duade! I currently have the 100-400 ii and a 1.4x mkiii extender, but have been toying with the idea of reading them in for the 100-500. I’ve been on the fence for a long while now and can’t decide. Would you say it’s a worthwhile upgrade or would you recommend sticking with the setup I currently have? Thank you
Hi I have traded the 100-400 for the 100-500 and dont regret. The extra 100 mm is welcome and slightly faster focusing and lighter a wonderful lens. Initially you compare and now I love it. and it is brilliant with the converters.
Gavin, I have to agree with rentoulzz below, the RF100-500 is a match made in heaven for the RF system. It is overpriced but boy is it sharp and you can use a 1.4 converter with it giving you 700mm. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade oooof, I’d better get saving then! Thanks for the reply!
I use a 100-400mm mk ii and added a cheap, second hand 2x ii. Focusing speed is not great and the IQ reduces a tad. But with the software that we have today, such as Topaz Denoise and others, we can easily recover the sharpness. I sometimes play with my 2x and a 1.4x iii together (yes, they fit together) and go crazy with 1.120mm of focal length. Both with the 2x and with the 2x + 1.4x combo, we get a nicer bokeh because of the longer focal length, especially when we're close to the subject. I've seen some reviews of the RF gear; they're great, but they come with a premium price that I'm not sure will make a huge difference in the final results. But if you're up to a splurge, why not?
@@cmeluzzi I ended up selling my 100-400 ii and 1.4x iii just over a month ago and got the 100-500 and I absolutely love it. Sharpness wise they are very similar, but af speed is quicker on the 100-500. Also the IS is amazing for handheld video even at 500mm (which I didn’t quite expect to be as good as it is)
The 100-400 ii is still a great lens though for sure
Duade, very interesting video, thank you. I have an R6 and Canon EF 100.- 400 mark 2 with both teleconverters. I’ve saved the funds for either an R5 or an RF 100 - 500 lens but I can’t make up my mind which to buy. Im not a professional,just a birder who likes to photograph birds. What would you go for? Which would improve my images the most potentially accepting the obvious importance of fieldcraft etc and that bird photography is not just about getting the best gear.
Robert, what a tough question to answer, and I don't really know what I would do. The lens in theory will stay with you for a longer time and hold its value better. But you may need a 1.4 converter for it as 500 can feel a little short but you are used to the 400mm focal range. I do wonder if its worth waiting to see if this unicorn R7 is ever going to be released. I can't help but think a 30mp APSC sensor with the AF and small improvements over the R6 will make a bigger overall difference.
I guess the question to ask is what do you feel your current kit is lacking, what do you feel you need or want to improve your shots?
Cheers, Duade
Duade, thank you for your very considered response. Bearing in mind spring is only about 6 weeks away in the UK (in theory at least) and with the days now noticeably lengthening and the light improving, I’ll work on my technique with the gear i have and wait to see what happens with a possible R7.
Hi can you explain why did you use this setting for "Nankeen Kestre" shot, why u are using 1600 ISO and 1/2000 during the day light.
Sorry for my english :D
Curious if you wear snake boots and which ones if you do. Thanks.
Walt, I currently use Muck Boots which are very comfortable for boots and have served me well. Probably a bit hot in summer though. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade thanks for the reply. That’s the same boots I wear here in Florida. They’re really comfortable but I sometimes get a bit concerned in the swamps. Love your videos but I can’t comment on them on the TV, thanks for making them. 🙂
Hi Duade! I always see you using the Sigma 150-600 or something similar, now you used this Canon L lens with teleconverter wich I have tried aswell. How do this two lenses compare to each other? Sigma with 1x4 would be perfectly comparable to this Canon with x2 teleconverter I guess.
Can you do this with the 1.4x on the R7 and compare it to the rf100-500
Hi duade,great job,I also have 100-400 with 1.4 extender,how did you find the image quality with 2x was it sharp or a bit soft ?,am going to upgrade from 80d to r5.
G'day Wayne, the IQ and AF took a hit for sure, but it was useable, I think I would stick with the 1.4 the majority of the time but if you have nice light and you need reach the 2x is a great option. Cheers, Duade
Hi Duade, nice video! Maybe I missed it in the video. But what kind of/how many autofocus points can you use on R serie cameras with this setup? Only center one or more? Thnx!
I'm pretty sure you get all of the focus points on the R series with the extenders. Some lenses to reduce the coverage but I think the 100-400 kept 100% coverage. Cheers, Duade
@@Duade Wow amazing. I need an R camera :-) Thnx for your reply.
Interesting video, you crop more than I expected, I find when the bird is a long way out they are soft. Do you post process a lot? I have recently bought an R6, the animal eye doesn't seem to work well in poor weather. I am always looking for better quality but a lot of reviews just make things up. Incidentally I use a Sigma 50-500 most of the time, can't see that the 100-100 is worth upgrading to and no way can I justify the 100-500 RF
Yes, the R5 allows a pretty decent crop. The Sigma 50-500 is not known to be the sharpest lens at 500mm. I would consider getting an RF mount lens in the future as they work so well with the R6. An affordable option to complement your zoom could be the RF800 F11. That lens will allow you to photograph those subjects that are a little further away and when you need reach. Another zoom is the RF100-400 but it does lack weather sealing. Good luck, Cheers, Duade
@@Duade I was looking at the Rf800, until I realised if I put a 2x extender on my ancient 400mm f2.8 it would be better, apart from the weight. I looked at the RF 100-400 which seemed good until I read 'a very sharp lens for the price'. At the moment I am trying to resolve a problem with Canon about the 'pin sharp' results from my 24-240. They are using woollen pins. I will probably go for the 100-400L, I have a Canon 1.4x mkI, but an independent x2 which I may change, 80% of my images lack that extra sharpness , last time I was photographing vultures it was in low cloud, which made it hard for the R6 to perform well. Browse Instagram, hibbertderek, if you are curious
Hi Duade, great video! Hope you are doing fine. I was wondering if youbcould help me, Im thorn between eos R and R6. Eos R is going really cheap these days. I know it has really slow fps. But it has 30mp, so it allows for a little bit of more crop if needed. Do you know/think if the AF is that big of a difference comparing with the R6 for wildlife general porposes or going to the zoo?
Kind regards from Portugal!
Hugo, the eye af of the R6 is game changing and reason alone to choose that over the EOS R. I would choose the R6 for pure wildlife as it is so much better with FPS, Buffer AF etc. I suspect Canon will release an APSC Mirrorless body this year which might be worth waiting for as well. Cheers, Duade