after watching a lot of Brett Adcock interviews (whose company is doing the same thing) this dude is a breath of air. goes into the technicals, makes you buy into his vision, and clearly shows a lifelong passion for the space
I agree, this guy i think is brilliant on this subject. I can almost compare him to elon musk how he stops and thinks about what to say in mid sentence.
I love Advancements more than most people. I just wish our society could adapt so we can utilize advancements to the fullest. We Require everyone to afford our cost of living. Yet we don't consider how unobtainable it's becoming. This is a common feeling here in America recently. It's like no matter what you do, it doesn't matter, you can't afford to even pay your month to month bills, you feel worthless, it's getting so out of control.
He says a lot of interesting and smart things. He is also very charming. But we also have to remember that prototypes are easy, production is hard. And I'd be really interested to learn about their Compute cluster and data pipeline. These things are not easy to get right.
Really amazing video. Love how you are getting into enough detail to get a deep view of how all of this might play out and what minds are behind 1X but not derail too much into 5 hour philosophical podcast type of interview (although I would probably be interested in that too.) But what left me thinking was his opinion on purpose and not being able to be happy without a purpose. Because I have kind of an opposite opinion on that. Especially with the future he is describing, I think there will be less and less humans who actually will have to have a meaningful impact on humanity because everything will probably be done by robots and AI utilized by a few very bright minds. With automation on the way it is now I think humanity should find a way to be happy with not having an impact on anything, otherwise we will hit a gigantic wave of depression and suicide (a little extreme but you get the idea). Would love to have a discussion on that topic with him.
Awesome interview, I'm glad its norwegians leading the race in making the best robots possible, not china nor wall street oligarchs. Hopefully this tech will benefit all of humanity and not just a few rich smoothbrain thugs.
Probably the most civilized people in the world, besides Icelandics. Quite the contrast with their viking roots. Also the only country in the world that puts most of the money earned with gas and oil sales, into pension funds for the population. All Norwegians get a fat pension when they retire, no matter their profession. They were smart to never join the EU, it would have sucked them dry.
I like where this company is headed, and I hope they are successful, and I love the vision of a "robot in every house". However, I'm hearing a disconnect between the academic nature of "can we do it" and the practicality of the product. I find it hard to envision selling 1M Neos, which would mean 1 out of every 100 households in the U.S. would have a Neo in the next few years. Personally, I would not spend even $5K on something that would do what I do - even if it was the best robot for feeding the cat or taking out the garbage for example. But I could see a farmer buying a $20K or $10K industrial version of Neo to do general, hard-labor chores in the barn (e.g. cleaning stalls, feeding livestock, "These hay bales need to go up in the loft", etc...) autonomously. In those applications, there might be a market for 100K Neos, the price would need to be marketable, and the robot would need to be trained on doing dirty, dangerous work.
Not new, in fact it's the oldest trick in the robot/AI book. Getting it to imitate everything with a correct context, is the new and hard part. In car factories, the production robots are trained this way, the engineer guides the arm to the points where work has to be done, and where obstacles have to be avoided. The robot then smooths out those guided movements to actual production movements with pre-programmed exact coordinates where to do work, fully autonomous. Experts will pick my explanation to bits, but what I described is roughly how it is done.
Biology is a constrained result of constrained developmental environments. It's exceptional oftentimes, but not the ultimate answer. I think maintainability will be key, and biology has completely different means to achieve that. If a more traditional piece without artificial tendons and muscles turns out to be cheaper and easier to replace, then that's the better solution.
@@tacitozetticci9308Having 2 actuators per dof is a BIG downside. But the important thing is variable slackness, which may be achieveable without 2 full stroke actuators.
28:51 The Mary the Superscientist Paradox has a simple answer, assuming that experience is determined by the physical state of the brain. If Mary, learning everything about colors, leads to a physical state of the brain that occurs when seeing colors, then she will experience the familiar sensation when she leaves the black and white room. If her brain has never been in the physical state that corresponds to seeing color, then she will learn something new.
Quite a perspective on what we have to forward to in the not too distant future! The environment where the robots are being built sounds like a place where I would like to work. For all the workers to be nice is an incredible environment to achieve because it is not human nature to be like that. I look forward to seeing all that will be accomplished in building the robots.😅😊
This is straight up building AI companions like in the fictional Halo Universe. We teach the humanoids to ignite the outward exploration of the human experience by kickstarting a new space race. In the process the AI that runs the robot meets a standard of reasoning consistently higher than their human companion. Once the imprint is defined, it then translates that to an exo skeleton for the real human, with added variables like, zero gravity and a system that retains oxygen and pressure. All of a sudden you got better fitting space suits, with AI Motor synergy for optimal performance. Its one step closer to Spartan Suits. At that point you watch out for civil wars and then aliens.
Ok. I love the focus on household robots. We really do need them. I do have an issue with these.... the covering. First off.... nothing that's expected to clean should ever have an absorbent fabric covering. One pass through a bathroom and this robot will NEVER get clean. Also, pinch points. You're covering them yes, but you're covering them with something that conceals them, without protecting against them. The covering needs to be completely non-absorbent and a bit thicker. Silicone maybe?
As a human I can reach every part of my body with my hands, just make the fabric coverings like headphone covers that can pop on and off and get automatically put in the washing machine every few days, same as we do clothing. Easy fix.
Absolutely no way we'll see millions of these in 4 years! That would be nation scale amount humanoids. They just can't be good enough AND affordable enough for that so soon. But regardless of whether a lot of these guys tend to be over-optimistic, the world will undoubtedly look incredibly different in 10 years!
@@jamesjonnes Yer not lookin at the big picture jimmy. Both husbands and wives may be terrific during mating season, But one thing we know fersurr is that both meat bags get older with every passing day. Eventually that meat body WEARS OUT! Not a pretty picture. Deny it if you want. You too will need a couple of non complaining "grown ups" just to keep up a decent tolerable standard of living. The vitality no longer flows up the vine. Finally you are going to lose all that forward mating momentum. THEN.... Not even able to make it to the toilet unaided. Think about THAT!
They will sell to cleaning companies. Most people will only need 1/10th of a robot. This will make them roughly 30x cheaper than illegal immigrants to clean your house.
I just wonder about all of those little road bumps coming up on the road to success. All of those motors in each robot will be depending on batteries for power (or perhaps some new method). At best 2 hours of running time per charge at present and it may be that they can plug themselves in and shut down to charge for 2 hours or so. Robots are covered with motors that will need to serviced etc too. Then since it is likely robots will be in society, we will need so many new laws. It is going to be such an interesting path to progress. The science fiction novels/movies/games just might be interesting resources for us. I'm excited to check it all out.
Even if a robot worked for an hour, then charged for an hour, then worked for an hour, repeat and repeat, that's 12 hours of work a day... don't think batteries are going to be an issue. Even if these bots broke down after a few years, the amount of work they could get done would far outweigh the cost of recycling and or repairing them.
@@pcigrock5874 I'm sure they will used wired connections for some power sources, but I'm also sure there will be a demand for many other forms of getting power to the new robots including batteries, solar, and other sources. It is going to be interesting to see what other sources they come up with. It will likely stimulate advancements in so many areas even beyond power sources. It is really going to be an interesting time.
Investors will want to see some sales soon due to the fear of competition. The 1x robots somehow look less intimidating than those from Tesla but it still looks like Neo could topple over easily and I wouldn't have one of these around my two kids. Make it waterproof enough to do the household ironing and you then have a solid proposition as the first Neo will stay in the laundry room in my house.
Did you not listen. Neo is probably the only bot you will have near your kids or in your home. The others make robots for the industry, 1X for the homes. I am pretty sure the investors (OpenAI) knows this very well. At the moment there is no competition for the home market.
@@andrewradford3953 That's the appeal Colombo, who can be bothered. The dress code is so casual for most workplaces but doing kids school uniforms is not easy to fit into people's lifestyles these days and you wouldn't want to send kids in scruffy. Either way Neo is shown reaching for a washing machine. It better be waterproof to some extent
It is possible for humanity to remain in the seat of control, but we will have to share power with our intelligent creations. If we dont adapt to this reality, it could mean the end of humanity as a species
bro what if we sent robots to space like the humanoids! i mean yeah we have rovers and stuff but this is next level. what if we sent them out to other planets for them to gather info and we can see this live. and i mean they dont need to eat so weight and space can be saved on the ships. they dont need air and all those components on a ship, just think about all the things possible with this. they dont have fear they can make calculations better then what we can
But will they implement UBI before 2030!? Many pioneers including billionaires, scientists, Nobel Prize winners, engineers, architects, analysts and so on and so forth... almost all agree that we will have AGI in 2027 and ASI in 2029 and looking at and evaluating the exponential technological acceleration curve I wonder why they have not yet implemented universal basic income to anticipate the trends that will come. Just to name one, Elon Musk says that we will have AGI already in 2025 and ASI 2029.
It might be a rough transition...50%-60%+ of workers probably have to lose their jobs first to the technology for the government to take major steps. Too many companies claim that AI will enhance the work of humans, and many people have their eyes closed to AGI or ASI. I just hope intelligent AI helps implement new systems for us that are superior to a UBI, money could become obsolete by 2030 and humans just have a digital value online in a virtual super world, who knows. ASI could be that dramatic that every human system we have completely vanishes before 2030. If true ASI arrives and is millions or billions of times more smarter than all of humanity combined. A lot of people are looking at it too linearly unfortunately , like we just have super strong automation with humanoids but no AGI until the late 2030s or 2040s. But even with billions of humanoids and slightly better LLMs than now, we could still see 90% of jobs vanish by 2030-2035, who knows...
hurr durr just remove work for millions/billions of people, and suddenly our world will work perfectly and everybody will be happy with nothing to do. Not
@@phen-themoogle7651 Do you think that in 2035 with the advent of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) and ASI (Artificial Super Intelligence) they will put in place universal basic income!? a subsidy!? there will be free will!? an era of abundance will begin!? the intellectual and motor skills of robots have already surpassed the average human and before 2035 there is talk of the fact that they will surpass those of any human being and then again those of any human being combined! regarding both the body and the mind! answer me please...
This robot has the potential to provide some truly groundbreaking solutions for contemporary living. The strides being made in humanoid technology are nothing short of remarkable, showcasing a level of sophistication that was once relegated to science fiction. As these advancements continue, it will be intriguing to observe how this technology can be seamlessly integrated into our daily routines, potentially transforming the way we live, work, and interact. The possibilities are exciting, and it will be fascinating to see how these innovations will shape our future.
If I had to make a guess, to send sensor data and observations and such to an external system. It could be for sending data to the robot, but from what they're describing I'd guess it's for pulling data off.
Why? Tesla has its own engineers, and for me, competition is good for the customer. We need more companies and we do not want any monopolies which hog talent. We have enough monopolies already that has caused so much harm to our societies (think social media for instance).
His watch during the interview not being secured previously to recording is so annoying to watch. I cannot unsee it. However! I’m excited for this next generation and robots
Blade Runner (and 2049) are basically about the dangers and evils of playing god. They certainly didn't imply building smart robot servants was a good idea.
If you have kinetic energy you have it, do not know what he means with energy optimization you can have less mass or make less speed or make more high torque engines
how long until 100% safe level 5 autonomous driving! and what level of autonomous driving are we at now? Has Tesla reached an advanced level 3? or are these shades of a level 4? (I mean the beginning)
We have already beaten humans in non-physical tasks like playing chess and Go. The next step is to surpass human intelligence and win against humans in games like tennis.
It's exciting having exponential abundance so close that we, as ethically motivated beings, will be able to more quickly abolish the moral blind spots in society that most people take part in today. "Do what you want, so long as it doesn't hurt anyone else" logically must extend ti animals as 'someone' instead of 'something' ,who are currently being systematically and forcibly bred and killed for the most damaging products for our environment and their lives.
@@michaelnurse9089 How humans drive cars successfully with only 2 cameras (eyes)? I'm assuming that humanoid robots will be as par or superior to humans And it is more general-purpose solution
Wake me up when its open source... I can mod it to be some perky anime chick with attitude. Until then, I see it as an annoying roommate who always hogs my charger. 😂
It looks really good, but I can see its speed of walking will be more of inconvenience and a hindrance of it getting the way because you may need to wait for it to clear before others can continue. In a big open space I don't see this being a problem but in the home I might have to wait a while in a smaller spaces. Robots needs to be able to move and work at the same speed as us.
They can actually move a lot faster but lose accuracy. Look at "Sanctuary AI - Phoenix at Human-Equivalent Speed" might be slightly slower than a human but it's pretty fast. They'll speed up a ton in 2 years (much more powerful LLMS even if incremental improvements every 3-6 months, new architectures/more optimized software/hardware interfaces/more real world data from actually being deployed in homes/factories), and be much more intelligent and able to learn new tasks within minutes or even faster than some humans maybe (and could be on some network so if 1 humanoid improves they all do). Walking speed is less necessary for most home jobs because if you have them washing dishes they are stationary for those 10-20 minutes, or however long they take. I don't care if they are 2x slower than me at dishes if they do just as good of job. Can have them clean individual rooms or tasks that don't require going back and forth, until they are able to move faster. Even if they take 3-4 hours to do 1-2 hours of chores/work, that still saves us a couple hours a day. And we only have to 'put up' with slower speeds for a couple years at most. But by the time they are in homes, pretty sure they will be a lot better than now.
after watching a lot of Brett Adcock interviews (whose company is doing the same thing) this dude is a breath of air. goes into the technicals, makes you buy into his vision, and clearly shows a lifelong passion for the space
I agree, this guy i think is brilliant on this subject. I can almost compare him to elon musk how he stops and thinks about what to say in mid sentence.
This guy is clearly intelligent, unlike Adcock
@@ignisimber2818 Adcock is smart he's just not a technical founder who's spent his whole life in the field, and it shows
@@ignisimber2818 im talking about this guy in the video, i thought he was adcock, who is he?
@@MaxStax88 he founded Figure AI, another prominent company building humanoid robots. He's done a number of interviews check him out on yt
This is so cool. It seems so obvious that this is gonna have a huge impact. The only question is how long it’s gonna take.
Exactly!
2027
I think it's safe to predict at least half of their forecast by 2027 and mass adoption in developed nations by 2030
They're just waiting for those home robots to be hacked and kill their owners. You people are out of touch with reality.
@@waterworld6684 Enough with the "chicken little" mindset, pal. Your insecurities are not our problem.
38:00 Absolutely brilliant
That was a really great interview - So many thought provoking ideas and topics. Well done!
I love Advancements more than most people. I just wish our society could adapt so we can utilize advancements to the fullest. We Require everyone to afford our cost of living. Yet we don't consider how unobtainable it's becoming. This is a common feeling here in America recently. It's like no matter what you do, it doesn't matter, you can't afford to even pay your month to month bills, you feel worthless, it's getting so out of control.
He says a lot of interesting and smart things. He is also very charming. But we also have to remember that prototypes are easy, production is hard. And I'd be really interested to learn about their Compute cluster and data pipeline. These things are not easy to get right.
Exactly we are nowhere near production ready robots. They drain battery, break and still isn’t exceptional at anything.
Love hearing more about this company
We need more humanoid robot episodes 😀😀 this is a very interesting topic and thanks for your episodes on Neo
Really amazing video. Love how you are getting into enough detail to get a deep view of how all of this might play out and what minds are behind 1X but not derail too much into 5 hour philosophical podcast type of interview (although I would probably be interested in that too.) But what left me thinking was his opinion on purpose and not being able to be happy without a purpose. Because I have kind of an opposite opinion on that. Especially with the future he is describing, I think there will be less and less humans who actually will have to have a meaningful impact on humanity because everything will probably be done by robots and AI utilized by a few very bright minds. With automation on the way it is now I think humanity should find a way to be happy with not having an impact on anything, otherwise we will hit a gigantic wave of depression and suicide (a little extreme but you get the idea). Would love to have a discussion on that topic with him.
Really good interview I have watched in a while and completed it.
Awesome interview, I'm glad its norwegians leading the race in making the best robots possible, not china nor wall street oligarchs. Hopefully this tech will benefit all of humanity and not just a few rich smoothbrain thugs.
Probably the most civilized people in the world, besides Icelandics. Quite the contrast with their viking roots.
Also the only country in the world that puts most of the money earned with gas and oil sales, into pension funds for the population.
All Norwegians get a fat pension when they retire, no matter their profession.
They were smart to never join the EU, it would have sucked them dry.
Can't wait ❤
joaquin phoenix did a good job asking questions 👍
Awesome interview.
Like a Kaiju movie, a lot of these presentations, with some reason, are getting a chorus of "GUY IN SUIT! GUY IN SUIT!'
1:06:17 Let's come back to this in 2040 and see if it changed lol!
Excellent
Theres like 15 humanoid robots being worked on right now. What makes neo or 1x better than the rest?
1x? wouldn't that just make them the same?
@@noone-ld7ptwell you could say "better" is 2x
This- ua-cam.com/video/bUrLuUxv9gE/v-deo.htmlsi=7qsTSChDWKfEGN7g
This- ua-cam.com/video/bUrLuUxv9gE/v-deo.htmlsi=7qsTSChDWKfEGN7g
Did you watch the video?
great interview
This is such a great video. I love his life philosophy.
I like where this company is headed, and I hope they are successful, and I love the vision of a "robot in every house". However, I'm hearing a disconnect between the academic nature of "can we do it" and the practicality of the product. I find it hard to envision selling 1M Neos, which would mean 1 out of every 100 households in the U.S. would have a Neo in the next few years. Personally, I would not spend even $5K on something that would do what I do - even if it was the best robot for feeding the cat or taking out the garbage for example. But I could see a farmer buying a $20K or $10K industrial version of Neo to do general, hard-labor chores in the barn (e.g. cleaning stalls, feeding livestock, "These hay bales need to go up in the loft", etc...) autonomously. In those applications, there might be a market for 100K Neos, the price would need to be marketable, and the robot would need to be trained on doing dirty, dangerous work.
How cool is that idea about training the robot to imitate a recording of a human!
Not new, in fact it's the oldest trick in the robot/AI book. Getting it to imitate everything with a correct context, is the new and hard part.
In car factories, the production robots are trained this way, the engineer guides the arm to the points where work has to be done, and where obstacles have to be avoided. The robot then smooths out those guided movements to actual production movements with pre-programmed exact coordinates where to do work, fully autonomous.
Experts will pick my explanation to bits, but what I described is roughly how it is done.
I believe in tendons AND antagonistic pairs! That's how we get compliance and prescision in biology.
Biology is a constrained result of constrained developmental environments. It's exceptional oftentimes, but not the ultimate answer.
I think maintainability will be key, and biology has completely different means to achieve that. If a more traditional piece without artificial tendons and muscles turns out to be cheaper and easier to replace, then that's the better solution.
@@tacitozetticci9308Having 2 actuators per dof is a BIG downside. But the important thing is variable slackness, which may be achieveable without 2 full stroke actuators.
28:51 The Mary the Superscientist Paradox has a simple answer, assuming that experience is determined by the physical state of the brain. If Mary, learning everything about colors, leads to a physical state of the brain that occurs when seeing colors, then she will experience the familiar sensation when she leaves the black and white room. If her brain has never been in the physical state that corresponds to seeing color, then she will learn something new.
I hope they make a lot more neos soon
2030-2050 gonna be insane
Great interview! Better mics would be great!
Can we talk about the power armor crafting station right behind him?
Okay can you guys show us what it can do?
Srsly 🧐
@shottathakid1898that's so random
Its marketing it has nothing to do with production ready systems
doesn't seem like it's able to do anything yet
whats the model used here
Considering current Norwegian manufacturing capability, this will be produced one unit per year.
Quite a perspective on what we have to forward to in the not too distant future! The environment where the robots are being built sounds like a place where I would like to work. For all the workers to be nice is an incredible environment to achieve because it is not human nature to be like that. I look forward to seeing all that will be accomplished in building the robots.😅😊
This is straight up building AI companions like in the fictional Halo Universe.
We teach the humanoids to ignite the outward exploration of the human experience by kickstarting a new space race. In the process the AI that runs the robot meets a standard of reasoning consistently higher than their human companion. Once the imprint is defined, it then translates that to an exo skeleton for the real human, with added variables like, zero gravity and a system that retains oxygen and pressure.
All of a sudden you got better fitting space suits, with AI Motor synergy for optimal performance.
Its one step closer to Spartan Suits.
At that point you watch out for civil wars and then aliens.
What's the cord on its foot in the workshop and the transparent cord on its back when it's in the house?
Make a female version if you want a lot of money
You heard the kitty cat
Go to Japan, and be gobsmacked. The choice is probably in the hundreds by now.
If they ain't got it in Japan, nobody has.
love these video's
Ok. I love the focus on household robots. We really do need them. I do have an issue with these.... the covering. First off.... nothing that's expected to clean should ever have an absorbent fabric covering. One pass through a bathroom and this robot will NEVER get clean. Also, pinch points. You're covering them yes, but you're covering them with something that conceals them, without protecting against them.
The covering needs to be completely non-absorbent and a bit thicker. Silicone maybe?
tbf you could put whatever clothing you want on it
The covering likely needs to be breathable for heat dissipation on the hardware
@@Shtofman I mean I get that, but it's going to get disgusting after a while....
As a human I can reach every part of my body with my hands, just make the fabric coverings like headphone covers that can pop on and off and get automatically put in the washing machine every few days, same as we do clothing. Easy fix.
@@william-wallace Does that cover look bleachable to you? Because it doesn't look bleachable to me.
Absolutely no way we'll see millions of these in 4 years! That would be nation scale amount humanoids. They just can't be good enough AND affordable enough for that so soon. But regardless of whether a lot of these guys tend to be over-optimistic, the world will undoubtedly look incredibly different in 10 years!
China will make them affordable.
Maybe the US will make the AI, maybe..
What chip does this robot use? How much computing power does it have?
Not ready. Will be the 1at to go out of business
"you can ask my wife, I never finish anything "
These robots are basically filling the roles of wives.
@@jamesjonnesmisread holes and wondered
@@jamesjonnes you don't think they will fill the roles of men at...finishing? 😂
@@DefenderX No because robots won't be protectors and providers when they have nothing to gain from a wife.
@@jamesjonnes Yer not lookin at the big picture jimmy. Both husbands and wives may be terrific during mating season, But one thing we know fersurr is that both meat bags get older with every passing day. Eventually that meat body WEARS OUT! Not a pretty picture. Deny it if you want. You too will need a couple of non complaining "grown ups" just to keep up a decent tolerable standard of living. The vitality no longer flows up the vine. Finally you are going to lose all that forward mating momentum. THEN.... Not even able to make it to the toilet unaided. Think about THAT!
He looks so handsome
If there is a single use for me and my family, or my Office I would buy 100% one.
they said demand is high, who will be buying it? what markets will they sell into first?
They will sell to cleaning companies. Most people will only need 1/10th of a robot. This will make them roughly 30x cheaper than illegal immigrants to clean your house.
I just wonder about all of those little road bumps coming up on the road to success. All of those motors in each robot will be depending on batteries for power (or perhaps some new method). At best 2 hours of running time per charge at present and it may be that they can plug themselves in and shut down to charge for 2 hours or so. Robots are covered with motors that will need to serviced etc too. Then since it is likely robots will be in society, we will need so many new laws. It is going to be such an interesting path to progress. The science fiction novels/movies/games just might be interesting resources for us. I'm excited to check it all out.
Even if a robot worked for an hour, then charged for an hour, then worked for an hour, repeat and repeat, that's 12 hours of work a day... don't think batteries are going to be an issue. Even if these bots broke down after a few years, the amount of work they could get done would far outweigh the cost of recycling and or repairing them.
What is the problem to work robot in plant facility wired
@@pcigrock5874 I'm sure they will used wired connections for some power sources, but I'm also sure there will be a demand for many other forms of getting power to the new robots including batteries, solar, and other sources. It is going to be interesting to see what other sources they come up with. It will likely stimulate advancements in so many areas even beyond power sources. It is really going to be an interesting time.
Investors will want to see some sales soon due to the fear of competition. The 1x robots somehow look less intimidating than those from Tesla but it still looks like Neo could topple over easily and I wouldn't have one of these around my two kids. Make it waterproof enough to do the household ironing and you then have a solid proposition as the first Neo will stay in the laundry room in my house.
Did you not listen. Neo is probably the only bot you will have near your kids or in your home. The others make robots for the industry, 1X for the homes. I am pretty sure the investors (OpenAI) knows this very well. At the moment there is no competition for the home market.
Who Irons in this century?
@@andrewradford3953 That's the appeal Colombo, who can be bothered. The dress code is so casual for most workplaces but doing kids school uniforms is not easy to fit into people's lifestyles these days and you wouldn't want to send kids in scruffy. Either way Neo is shown reaching for a washing machine. It better be waterproof to some extent
@BMc308 Glad you agree
Who chose the music?
How much?
Would be interesting to see the internals of their tendon drive unit
All the robot companies are hiding these sorts of details.
How much for neo?
He said price of affordable car
It is possible for humanity to remain in the seat of control, but we will have to share power with our intelligent creations. If we dont adapt to this reality, it could mean the end of humanity as a species
1:05:50
bro what if we sent robots to space like the humanoids! i mean yeah we have rovers and stuff but this is next level. what if we sent them out to other planets for them to gather info and we can see this live. and i mean they dont need to eat so weight and space can be saved on the ships. they dont need air and all those components on a ship, just think about all the things possible with this. they dont have fear they can make calculations better then what we can
I see u uncensored the wrist joint s and the cords gone
But will they implement UBI before 2030!? Many pioneers including billionaires, scientists, Nobel Prize winners, engineers, architects, analysts and so on and so forth... almost all agree that we will have AGI in 2027 and ASI in 2029 and looking at and evaluating the exponential technological acceleration curve I wonder why they have not yet implemented universal basic income to anticipate the trends that will come. Just to name one, Elon Musk says that we will have AGI already in 2025 and ASI 2029.
It might be a rough transition...50%-60%+ of workers probably have to lose their jobs first to the technology for the government to take major steps. Too many companies claim that AI will enhance the work of humans, and many people have their eyes closed to AGI or ASI. I just hope intelligent AI helps implement new systems for us that are superior to a UBI, money could become obsolete by 2030 and humans just have a digital value online in a virtual super world, who knows. ASI could be that dramatic that every human system we have completely vanishes before 2030. If true ASI arrives and is millions or billions of times more smarter than all of humanity combined. A lot of people are looking at it too linearly unfortunately , like we just have super strong automation with humanoids but no AGI until the late 2030s or 2040s. But even with billions of humanoids and slightly better LLMs than now, we could still see 90% of jobs vanish by 2030-2035, who knows...
hurr durr just remove work for millions/billions of people, and suddenly our world will work perfectly and everybody will be happy with nothing to do.
Not
ANI 2022 (GPT4)
AGI 2027 (GPT6)
ASI 2032 (GPT8)
No near AGI in 2030. Maybe something like in 2045.
@@phen-themoogle7651 Do you think that in 2035 with the advent of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) and ASI (Artificial Super Intelligence) they will put in place universal basic income!? a subsidy!? there will be free will!? an era of abundance will begin!? the intellectual and motor skills of robots have already surpassed the average human and before 2035 there is talk of the fact that they will surpass those of any human being and then again those of any human being combined! regarding both the body and the mind! answer me please...
I would love to be apart of the training and teaching it things it would be like have a child in the home.
This robot has the potential to provide some truly groundbreaking solutions for contemporary living. The strides being made in humanoid technology are nothing short of remarkable, showcasing a level of sophistication that was once relegated to science fiction. As these advancements continue, it will be intriguing to observe how this technology can be seamlessly integrated into our daily routines, potentially transforming the way we live, work, and interact. The possibilities are exciting, and it will be fascinating to see how these innovations will shape our future.
Why is the bot plugged in at the foot?
If I had to make a guess, to send sensor data and observations and such to an external system. It could be for sending data to the robot, but from what they're describing I'd guess it's for pulling data off.
@@FeralGuardian needs to be plugged in like my vacuum cleaner. Such progress. 😂😂😎🏳️🌈
Tether to stop it falling. Looked like it was keeping the legs together - stop them from splaying.
3 years: 2027 i love her child good
man there gonna be so many babies named john connor soon
These folks want us to train our house robot like we would do with a dog or how we'd teach a kid. That's the NoCode dream taken to the extreme
Great interview. I really like this guy. I wish he would be working on optimus at tsla!
Why? Tesla has its own engineers, and for me, competition is good for the customer. We need more companies and we do not want any monopolies which hog talent. We have enough monopolies already that has caused so much harm to our societies (think social media for instance).
Imagine sports with robots. Like baseball or MMA but each robot gets sponsored like NASCAR
His watch during the interview not being secured previously to recording is so annoying to watch. I cannot unsee it.
However! I’m excited for this next generation and robots
Blade Runner (and 2049) are basically about the dangers and evils of playing god. They certainly didn't imply building smart robot servants was a good idea.
🤖🤖 bep bop
Invest in Space, Electric Car companies, Robotics Tech and AI. Next 5-15 years will be a whirlwind
So Robots that engage with the problem until can solve it ?
If you have kinetic energy you have it, do not know what he means with energy optimization you can have less mass or make less speed or make more high torque engines
Robot Any function just stand next to you? High five?low five? Morning call? Electric shock? ???????
The utter delusion to think this company is going to produce 100k of these bots in 2027
Tesla can ramp a car factory to 100000 in a year or so. Even faster in China. These are easier to make than cars.
@@michaelnurse9089 these boys ain't Tesla
how long until 100% safe level 5 autonomous driving! and what level of autonomous driving are we at now? Has Tesla reached an advanced level 3? or are these shades of a level 4? (I mean the beginning)
hopefully never
Wrong chat
@@jackwilliamburgess NO
Were at 3. People say that self driving will only be solved with AGI or something very close to AGI
Level 3 with tesla, waymo is level 4 though
We have already beaten humans in non-physical tasks like playing chess and Go. The next step is to surpass human intelligence and win against humans in games like tennis.
Tennis will be the last step, not the next step.
It's exciting having exponential abundance so close that we, as ethically motivated beings, will be able to more quickly abolish the moral blind spots in society that most people take part in today. "Do what you want, so long as it doesn't hurt anyone else" logically must extend ti animals as 'someone' instead of 'something' ,who are currently being systematically and forcibly bred and killed for the most damaging products for our environment and their lives.
was the interviewer born in the year 2000?
Seems like the Elon Musk of mass market humanoid robotics.
This can drive a car considering they can deliver an household robots
Why we need then driverless cars?
No, they will not drive cars. A driverless car has 7 cameras and a massive inference computer.
@@michaelnurse9089 How humans drive cars successfully with only 2 cameras (eyes)?
I'm assuming that humanoid robots will be as par or superior to humans
And it is more general-purpose solution
Next Elon Musk right here
Yo dude these videos are sus! how are u pumping them out this fast? are u actually interviewing these people?
Sorry, I can’t see them getting to even 1000s of robots, they are still in the early phases of Robotics
I've Tourette's do you think you can hire me to build robots and not fire me?
Wake me up when its open source... I can mod it to be some perky anime chick with attitude. Until then, I see it as an annoying roommate who always hogs my charger. 😂
It looks really good, but I can see its speed of walking will be more of inconvenience and a hindrance of it getting the way because you may need to wait for it to clear before others can continue. In a big open space I don't see this being a problem but in the home I might have to wait a while in a smaller spaces. Robots needs to be able to move and work at the same speed as us.
They can actually move a lot faster but lose accuracy. Look at "Sanctuary AI - Phoenix at Human-Equivalent Speed" might be slightly slower than a human but it's pretty fast. They'll speed up a ton in 2 years (much more powerful LLMS even if incremental improvements every 3-6 months, new architectures/more optimized software/hardware interfaces/more real world data from actually being deployed in homes/factories), and be much more intelligent and able to learn new tasks within minutes or even faster than some humans maybe (and could be on some network so if 1 humanoid improves they all do). Walking speed is less necessary for most home jobs because if you have them washing dishes they are stationary for those 10-20 minutes, or however long they take. I don't care if they are 2x slower than me at dishes if they do just as good of job. Can have them clean individual rooms or tasks that don't require going back and forth, until they are able to move faster. Even if they take 3-4 hours to do 1-2 hours of chores/work, that still saves us a couple hours a day. And we only have to 'put up' with slower speeds for a couple years at most. But by the time they are in homes, pretty sure they will be a lot better than now.
you don't want something like that running around
@@More_Row I mentioned speed of walking, nothing about running.
@@SlayerEddyTV You understood perfectly my point
@@More_Row Yes I do want something like that walking around us, and we will, as many other different companies bring their own robots.
Need Low price
Words!
Where comes the money for production hell ? Ask Elon how difficult it can be. Good Luck!
Chineses: not so fast boy, not so fast.
Too late we expect by 2025 january
He sounds just like Elon Musk when he speaks about numbers.
sound is bad
@44:42 "why is that?" comment was totally not place at the right question in the interview lol
This video would go really well with an announcement for a new Deus Ex game. (PLEASE)
Ok, and then? What is the ramp up? Because at this level Tesla will eat their lunch.
1/8th as sophisticated as Figure, and 8x more ambitious production plan.
doubt.jpg
Cool guy - echos of a young Musk. Did he imply at the end that he was in a polyamorous marriage? (Not that there's anything wrong with that...)
Musk? 😂 thats not a compliment
clothes ...why ?
He is playing the "Self driving next year" card for the next 10 years, the same way Musk has been doing .all along
You promised to bring more videos on UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME
As shit as siri, the most underwhelming shit ever.
but only you guys want to live in a world like that thats the problem :/