114: Special Non-Emergency Election Episode

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 жов 2024
  • Helen, Adam and Andy try to answer your questions about the election - not 'who's going to win?' (everyone knows that) but the more interesting bits. Plus a special double quiz of Eyes past and campaigns present.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 62

  • @capt.bart.roberts4975
    @capt.bart.roberts4975 4 місяці тому +11

    Watching Sunackered in the rain, with "Things can only get better" serenading him. Put about a kilo on the pile of evidence for my theory. That, we've taken a wrong turn down the trouser leg of time and into a satire universe!

  • @andrewmartin4575
    @andrewmartin4575 4 місяці тому +5

    Good to receive intelligent and objective insights .

  • @rorymackie2221
    @rorymackie2221 4 місяці тому +7

    enjoying these podcasts - looking forward to the next hourly episodes :)

  • @MsBeadee
    @MsBeadee 4 місяці тому +4

    Enjoying your podcasts

  • @thebagelsproductions
    @thebagelsproductions 4 місяці тому +10

    Trust the tories to whip somebody's seat from underneath them when they develop spinal problems.

    • @AlexWorrell
      @AlexWorrell 4 місяці тому

      Tories usually like to be whipped 🤫

  • @Timlagor
    @Timlagor 4 місяці тому +3

    19:20 We wouldn't be hearing more from Farage. take a look at how much free airtime BBC have given him over the last 20 years sometime. We might get coverage of the Greens occasionally though.

  • @petern3363
    @petern3363 4 місяці тому +1

    Loving the team and the content.

  • @nigelbaldwin1038
    @nigelbaldwin1038 4 місяці тому +2

    Excellent 👍🏼

  • @henryjohnfacey8213
    @henryjohnfacey8213 4 місяці тому

    Excellent thank you.

  • @mentality-monster
    @mentality-monster 3 місяці тому +2

    Nigel Farage has a net negative popularity rating of minus 4%.

  • @deetoher
    @deetoher 4 місяці тому +4

    If the UK implemented proportional representation using multi-seat constituencies and single transferable vote (as implemented in Ireland) then candidates have to be "transfer friendly" so it discourages extreme candidates.
    If you had a 3 seat constituency, then winning candidates would need to reach 25% (+1 vote) of the preferences which means that a party with more than 50% of the vote could have 2 seats, but it is unlikely to have all 3.
    More seats mean a more proportional makeup of the parliament; Ireland has found 5 to be a sweet spot for max number of seats in a constituency.

    • @TheOwlsarewatching606
      @TheOwlsarewatching606 4 місяці тому

      Bot

    • @deetoher
      @deetoher 4 місяці тому

      @TheOwlsarewatching606 just a glitchy internet connection resulting in double posting...

    • @ausbrum
      @ausbrum 4 місяці тому +2

      There are 650 Commons MPs. So you'd have 3 seat constituencies ,bringing the total to 1050. Hello?Anyone there?

    • @deetoher
      @deetoher 4 місяці тому +2

      @@ausbrum if going for between 3 and 5 seater constituencies, you would have between 130 and 217 constituencies to give you 650 MPs.
      The constituencies would cover larger geographic areas.

    • @etahenry3377
      @etahenry3377 3 місяці тому

      Have to say,as a great admirer of STV,that it didn't keep out the extremists in the last local elections

  • @jacquelynwilliams9627
    @jacquelynwilliams9627 4 місяці тому +6

    My favorite fish sun cream is mayonnaise

    • @AndrewMcColl
      @AndrewMcColl 4 місяці тому +3

      Mine is tartare

    • @michaelburggraf2822
      @michaelburggraf2822 4 місяці тому

      Does it work for obstructed fishermen too? Like Michael Gove or Nigel Farage?

    • @DingLiren-nw2vj
      @DingLiren-nw2vj 3 місяці тому

      I like a whipped egg white myself

  • @somthingbrutal
    @somthingbrutal 4 місяці тому +2

    in the case of farrage, when was the last time he won any election, isn't he basically the less fun version of screaming lord such at this point

  • @jsquire5pa
    @jsquire5pa 3 місяці тому

    I think Helen doesn’t like losing 😂

  • @ohyeah2816
    @ohyeah2816 4 місяці тому +5

    I'm waiting for all the voting fraud accusations. We had that nonsense when the local Faragist (can't remember what it was called at the time) party lost in Peterborough. Vote Labour 👍🏼✌🏼️💖😊

  • @Timlagor
    @Timlagor 4 місяці тому

    If we introduce Sortition instead of PR we never have to worry about a GE again

  • @Nanonude
    @Nanonude 4 місяці тому +1

    Clearly I am weird!

  • @AlanLogan-x5c
    @AlanLogan-x5c 3 місяці тому

    PR sort of works in Holyrood. Tho SNP gave a couple of tricky practical issues to their Green colleagues like the Deposit Return Scheme and then watched them making a complete mess of them.

  • @saferbysound1602
    @saferbysound1602 4 місяці тому

    counterpoint. If its a genius idea the voters might not care who implements it. caring for the constituents my arse

  • @nickrails
    @nickrails 4 місяці тому +3

    Pretty straight ahead analysis for a Private Eye joint.....wheres the satire?

    • @taffyman6089
      @taffyman6089 4 місяці тому

      No satire just reality, facts and the truth. The Tories have become clowns to the nation and it is all self inflicted. Enjoy!

  • @jackosbornerichardseon9095
    @jackosbornerichardseon9095 4 місяці тому +1

    i never knew the fish dude was doing the private eye pod or i would have stated listning sooner
    liked subscribed

  • @PaulZazzi
    @PaulZazzi 4 місяці тому +2

    Love your work, do you think that PARTY POLITICS is a failing system

  • @simac3880
    @simac3880 4 місяці тому +12

    The argument that representative voting is problematic becuase it would increase the Right vote is silly. It's disappointing to hear this ignorant point of view on this podcast. Representative voting represents the population. Yes, 16% of seats would be Reform. But 10% in the Parliament would be Green, etc. A representive system is reflective of the population as opposed to the backwards system than exists, where about a third of the population are unrepresented. Use your brains!

    • @gavincassells7585
      @gavincassells7585 4 місяці тому +2

      I think Israel is the cautionary tale for the effect of smaller right wing parties on mainstream policy. The effect of big tent parties is that the extremes (both of them) get muted to some extent because there is a ceiling on their ability to attract enough of an electorate to exist on their own. Now, pressures can build and nothing helps an extreme party than being persistently out of power and having an issue to bang on about that voters care about. If you are a centrist, and Private Eye ostensibly is, this means that first past the post has some appeal. I disagree with it, but I don't think that Private Eye folk aren't using their brains, they are just displaying their own bias.

    • @daphnepk
      @daphnepk 4 місяці тому

      Also odd to hear France as a cautionary tale about proportional systems. Their system is not proportional, but a kind of first past the post with the possibility of a second round

  • @davidatkinson7356
    @davidatkinson7356 3 місяці тому +1

    (Durham in the North-West? Ed.)

  • @jsquire5pa
    @jsquire5pa 3 місяці тому

    I’m not sure the guardian is exactly trying to push Labour leftward! .. in reality it’s an wxtremely centrist paper (ever more so with ciber in charge) and in fact very right wing on foreign policy …

  • @Timlagor
    @Timlagor 4 місяці тому

    What if Starmer loses his seat but Labour win a majority?

    • @BrianPaterson-f3i
      @BrianPaterson-f3i 4 місяці тому

      What if labour and starmer both lose that’s a win win for the uk!

    • @CommodoreVic20
      @CommodoreVic20 4 місяці тому +1

      ​@@BrianPaterson-f3iLOL
      Dream on

    • @Timlagor
      @Timlagor 4 місяці тому

      @@BrianPaterson-f3i Sure but I don't have any hope of Labour losing.

    • @DingLiren-nw2vj
      @DingLiren-nw2vj 3 місяці тому

      Party strategists pick the seat their leader sits in to ensure a win and pour a lot of resources in. If he hadn't won but labour did, I imagine they'd go with the deputy PM or a leadership vote

  • @TheLastSongbird124
    @TheLastSongbird124 3 місяці тому

    Those booths are not wide enough for 60% of Americans!

  • @richardbyrnes8398
    @richardbyrnes8398 4 місяці тому +1

    This is even more dull than the Newsagents. Lord Gnome out!

  • @TheOwlsarewatching606
    @TheOwlsarewatching606 4 місяці тому

    Podcasting seems to be a terminal dose of boring stuff available anywhere

  • @gerardferry3958
    @gerardferry3958 4 місяці тому +3

    you used to be funny

    • @Paul--Nobody_Is_Out_To_Get_You
      @Paul--Nobody_Is_Out_To_Get_You 4 місяці тому +4

      First time for me listening/reading P.E. since my parents got the mag decades ago. I like their angle, wish they'd do more on youtube as nobody has to pay for this thing any more so I'm not buying the mag.

    • @gerardferry3958
      @gerardferry3958 4 місяці тому +1

      @@Paul--Nobody_Is_Out_To_Get_You bit like sex

    • @SuezWSuezW
      @SuezWSuezW 4 місяці тому +5

      @@Paul--Nobody_Is_Out_To_Get_You If you're not paying, you're the product.

    • @Paul--Nobody_Is_Out_To_Get_You
      @Paul--Nobody_Is_Out_To_Get_You 4 місяці тому +2

      @@SuezWSuezW Not logical.
      But maybe I was wrong too as PE is unique.

    • @DC-wt2vi
      @DC-wt2vi 4 місяці тому +8

      ​@PaulHearder At under 40 quid for a whole year of print plus podcasts and archive pdfs, I think it's a no brainer to support just about the only free press left in my country. I restarted my subscription at the 2019 election, and it's kept me informed since.