Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

The History of Civil Rights in the US and Canada: Every Year

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 чер 2019
  • SEE A BETTER VERSION HERE:
    • The History of Civil R...
    This video maps out the progress of civil rights movements in the US and Canada regarding of abolishing slavery, minority rights, women's rights, and LGBT+ rights. Not every aspect can be shown.
    Important note: segregation laws existed before 1871 but aren't shown until then to avoid cluttering the map.
    13th Amendment: Ended legal slavery.
    14th Amendment: All citizens are equal under the law.
    15th Amendment: You can vote regardless of race.
    19th Amendment: Women can vote.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6 тис.

  • @EmperorTigerstar
    @EmperorTigerstar  5 років тому +5127

    Goes without saying that disrespectful comments will be removed. You know who you are and what I mean. Enjoy the video.

    • @Only.D.G.
      @Only.D.G. 5 років тому +45

      Ok, bunch of english sticks

    • @proudgay419
      @proudgay419 5 років тому +207

      Thank you very much. ☺

    • @djuradjuric7161
      @djuradjuric7161 5 років тому +46

      @Marcus Heath speech from freedom

    • @pandurucatalin
      @pandurucatalin 5 років тому +10

      What's the name of the music playing in the background?

    • @danielc2310
      @danielc2310 5 років тому +188

      EmperorTigerstar I support you in this but I wish comments on other videos would be removed as well. There are too many racist commenters who show up consistently from video to video.

  • @xenonmax
    @xenonmax 5 років тому +4901

    Wyoming was the first state to fully give women the right to vote because it wasn’t hard to convince all 6 people living in the state

    • @Blakbox92
      @Blakbox92 2 роки тому +927

      "So we're going to let Ruth and Mildred vote? Sounds fine to me"

    • @greywolf7577
      @greywolf7577 2 роки тому

      The reason Wyoming legalized women voting is because it was the only way to convince women to move out to the middle of nowhere.

    • @kaixiang5390
      @kaixiang5390 2 роки тому +223

      Took longer in the urban states because men did most of the heavy lifting and labor work in cities. On the frontier, everyone has to pull their own weight.

    • @rattfish
      @rattfish 2 роки тому +84

      implying it’s real

    • @OldDood
      @OldDood 2 роки тому +37

      I was thinking that as well.
      Plus if they did not get to vote then the wives would keep pestering their husbands on what to support/vote for anyways.

  • @AlternateHistoryHub
    @AlternateHistoryHub 5 років тому +4939

    Mexico really was stubborn on that whole "women voting" thing weren't they.

    • @dave_riots
      @dave_riots 5 років тому +103

      Very stubborn.

    • @user-gn1er6ft4n
      @user-gn1er6ft4n 5 років тому +17

      1 like lol

    • @linkfromzelda1002
      @linkfromzelda1002 4 роки тому +259

      That was because they still had male-only conscription and still have it to this day. It's the reason women couldn't vote until 1920 in the US but couldn't be conscripted.

    • @artermis122
      @artermis122 3 роки тому +115

      Wait until you find out about Switzerland

    • @The_Soviet_Onion
      @The_Soviet_Onion 3 роки тому +374

      The US really was stubborn on that whole “LGBT” thing weren’t they?

  • @JJMcCullough
    @JJMcCullough 9 місяців тому +440

    Marriage isn't a provincial jurisdiction in Canada, so it was kind of an odd situation when courts were declaring gay marriage legal in specific provinces during the early 2000s. It forced the federal government to act, which is why parliament revised the federal definition of marriage in 2005, and then SSM became legal everywhere.

    • @vexisvibin
      @vexisvibin 9 місяців тому +9

      Woah, 50 seconds ago. Thanks, JJ!

    • @samuelb-1406
      @samuelb-1406 9 місяців тому +6

      Wow, cool that I caught this comment early. Keep up the great work JJ

    • @KcMapping
      @KcMapping 9 місяців тому +1

      hoh

    • @asteroid101TD
      @asteroid101TD 9 місяців тому +1

      verified UA-camr here, epic

    • @darkdragon5520
      @darkdragon5520 9 місяців тому

      Huh, here I see you again, dear xenophobic youtuber

  • @justsomestuf
    @justsomestuf 3 роки тому +1886

    I love how Canada is almost completely monochrome the entire way through whilst the US looks like abstract art
    Edit: Look guys, I know why it's like that, and I never said one was better than the other, I was just pointing it out, now please chill

    • @a_human8489
      @a_human8489 3 роки тому +36

      I prefer my solid block of green to your blood stained butter vomit

    • @compatriot852
      @compatriot852 2 роки тому +68

      It's as if America is a far larger country than Canada with not as strong of a central government.

    • @onthehorizon4097
      @onthehorizon4097 2 роки тому +15

      @@compatriot852 Canada literally being bigger than the usa

    • @BasicLib
      @BasicLib 2 роки тому +134

      @@onthehorizon4097 Geographically they’re really similar with Canada being bigger in total area but smaller in total land area
      The US however has consistently been above 10 times Canada’s population throughout its entire history, it’s not even close
      That’s what people mean by bigger
      Not geographically but demographically. After all land doesn’t launch rebellions over central government mandates, lots of people across lots of land do.

    • @cowzilla9982
      @cowzilla9982 2 роки тому +13

      Mostly because of style of government

  • @superpacocaalado7215
    @superpacocaalado7215 5 років тому +6561

    Mexico : It's ok to be gay, but women can't vote
    Athens : My man !

    • @ggobhhh8329
      @ggobhhh8329 5 років тому +45

      SUPER PAÇOCA ALADO actually no true Athenian women participated in government ...

    • @MattBnl2ih
      @MattBnl2ih 5 років тому +176

      ggob hhh that's what he said woman can't vote

    • @ggobhhh8329
      @ggobhhh8329 5 років тому +23

      john doe no Athenian women could

    • @99jean88
      @99jean88 5 років тому +11

      Wow, mexicans really hate women

    • @patstudios1184
      @patstudios1184 5 років тому +49

      Now I understand Percy Jackson, Mexico is the Macedon of the west

  • @AlexanderPallares
    @AlexanderPallares 5 років тому +10344

    Mexico: It's ok to be gay
    Also Mexico: Women can't vote.

  • @Abcflc
    @Abcflc 3 роки тому +950

    The mind-blowing thing for Millennial and Gen Z is how recent LGBT rights truly are and how hostile the environment was, even during the 90s.

    • @smokedham5119
      @smokedham5119 2 роки тому +42

      And how bout that gay panic law.

    • @Gorg-oe1hu
      @Gorg-oe1hu 2 роки тому +22

      @@KlaustheViking For real. They want special privileges at this point. How can you claim you're oppressed when all you have to do, is claim somebody was homophobic and that person you claimed is homophobic, will lose their job. Same goes for women. They literally have every right everyone else does but they wont stop until they get more.

    • @Yinzgahndahntahn
      @Yinzgahndahntahn 2 роки тому +62

      @@KlaustheViking are you high or just incredibly stupid? You do realize that up until a Supreme Court decision in 2020, it was legal to fire someone for being gay or trans? LGBTQ people were not allowed to marry until the 2000’s. There were no legal protections such as; hospital visitation, next of kin documents, the ability to adopted children, etc. Today there are still thousands of people that were fired from federal jobs because until 1993, the federal government would fire you if you got found out to be gay. So those are just some of the rights we didn’t have. The right of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness specifically excluded LGBTQ Americans.

    • @KlaustheViking
      @KlaustheViking 2 роки тому +6

      @@Yinzgahndahntahn No, just know bullshit when I see it you dumb broad. It’s only assumed that gays were not hired due to being gay. LGBT people have so many privileges now that you can’t fire them for any other reason BECAUSE of their sexuality. Just like companies have to hire non-whites because laws deem it discrimination if they don’t hire them because of their skin color. The laws are not helping anyone. It’s giving people privileges to get what they want without scrutiny.

    • @Blakbox92
      @Blakbox92 2 роки тому +278

      @@KlaustheViking Ability to see their partner in hospital and act on their behalf, ability to adopt, discrimination about family based services, hell, in some places, it was legal to discriminate based on orientation for a long time. There's information online about this, but you're choosing to be ignorant.

  • @idkjustchangingmyname7343
    @idkjustchangingmyname7343 2 роки тому +487

    Man, as a new orlenian it depressed the hell out of me to see my state turn from banning slavery to allowing it. We aren’t responsible for our ancestors mistakes but videos like this help me at least realize how susceptible we are to falling for them again. Thank you.

    • @JPEG785
      @JPEG785 2 роки тому +2

      Bender

    • @sonofthebearking3335
      @sonofthebearking3335 2 роки тому +2

      Amen.

    • @diamondgirly2126
      @diamondgirly2126 2 роки тому +64

      thats cuz it was controlled by the french and they abolished slavery before the United states did so when america bought the land slavery was then allowed

    • @gamermapper
      @gamermapper 2 роки тому +11

      That's what you get from being runned by civilized French people to uneducated anglos. Vive la Louisiane française ! 🇫🇷

    • @idkjustchangingmyname7343
      @idkjustchangingmyname7343 2 роки тому +6

      @@gamermapper haha! Also thank you for your culture of food. It has made my life in New Orleans 10 times better! Cheers from across the pond

  • @Kardia_of_Rhodes
    @Kardia_of_Rhodes 5 років тому +5347

    "You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else."
    - Winston Churchill

    • @ItsJussMe
      @ItsJussMe 5 років тому +380

      Heart of Iron RGF
      Well, Winston wasn’t so peachy clean himself

    • @KrazyKatPosse
      @KrazyKatPosse 5 років тому +163

      Heart of Iron RGF The same thing can be said of Winston, too.

    • @flamesofchaos13
      @flamesofchaos13 5 років тому +366

      As an American I'll admit he's 100% right...BUT literally our cousins are no better themselves so they got no room to talk.

    • @chiprbob
      @chiprbob 5 років тому +73

      I guess he would know since his mother was American.

    • @mlgprussian7115
      @mlgprussian7115 4 роки тому +15

      Yes but we are always the first to do the right thing. After we get it right then countries follow

  • @Jack209
    @Jack209 3 роки тому +130

    "All men are created equal" took 200 years to live up to that. All men excluded:
    Native Americans
    African Americans
    Asian Americans
    Indentured servants
    Those who didn't own land
    Non Christians
    Arabs
    Indians
    Irish
    "Some men are created equal" was more accurate.

    • @Lucas-ec5db
      @Lucas-ec5db 3 роки тому +12

      Gays*

    • @davidmagann1805
      @davidmagann1805 3 роки тому +19

      As to quote George Orwell in Animal Farm: “We are all equal, but some are more equal than others.”

    • @airqx2808
      @airqx2808 3 роки тому +4

      And when I meant Thomas Jefferson
      Imma compell him to include women in the sequel

    • @growlboy360
      @growlboy360 3 роки тому +4

      Hispanics?

    • @onthehorizon4097
      @onthehorizon4097 2 роки тому +1

      Just say white Christians

  • @manov_denis
    @manov_denis 4 роки тому +98

    2:20 *Mexico has it’s own opinion for everything*

  • @eldelostacos9980
    @eldelostacos9980 5 років тому +1595

    *1840's Kentucky*: So women can vote here?
    *Well yes, but actually no*

    • @seannolan9857
      @seannolan9857 5 років тому +84

      Certain women in certain elections.

    • @ltbubbas
      @ltbubbas 5 років тому +52

      @@seannolan9857 kinda, but sorta maybe

    • @maspunchnath7487
      @maspunchnath7487 4 роки тому +24

      Same for Québec sometime before 1940

    • @xander1052
      @xander1052 3 роки тому +7

      also NJ in the 18th century lol

    • @elifoley_06
      @elifoley_06 3 роки тому +9

      Pretty based at the time ngl

  • @AndrewVasirov
    @AndrewVasirov 5 років тому +2945

    1786: Women can vote in the USA!
    1787: "Whoops, by 'all men are created equal' I meant only male humans. My bad"

    • @SpaceDoge
      @SpaceDoge 5 років тому +402

      *Straight white males

    • @iamaheretic7829
      @iamaheretic7829 5 років тому +437

      @@_blank-_ *Straight cis white Christian protestant males

    • @ShidaiTaino
      @ShidaiTaino 5 років тому +454

      Obi Wan Kenobi *rich straight white Christian Protestant males

    • @wildcard9010
      @wildcard9010 5 років тому +96

      @@ShidaiTaino oompah loompahs

    • @jeffersonclippership2588
      @jeffersonclippership2588 5 років тому +146

      @@ShidaiTaino *rich straight white Christian Protestant British males

  • @liamh2255
    @liamh2255 Рік тому +30

    Your videos provide so much chronological context I would otherwise have no way of accessing. Thanks for your work on these projects.

  • @TheUsuallySilentOne
    @TheUsuallySilentOne 4 роки тому +52

    México: we're OK with women fighting and giving their lives for the revolution
    Also Mexico: but we're not okay with giving women the right to vote for at least 3 more decades

    • @robertleon4323
      @robertleon4323 Рік тому

      United States: It's okay for women to vote, but don't hang out with people of a different skin color

  • @JeffHMobile
    @JeffHMobile 5 років тому +2867

    So women couldnt vote in Mexico but homosexuality was decriminalized thats kinda strange

    • @krazownik3139
      @krazownik3139 5 років тому +532

      In practice even if women could vote it won't matter, as far I know there was de facto dictatorship in Mexico till the '80.

    • @qwertytypewriter2013
      @qwertytypewriter2013 5 років тому +253

      @@krazownik3139 Mexico's last dictatorship was from 1877 to 1911. After the Revolution it was dominated by a single party (PRI) but since the 1917 constitution presidents can never be reelected. In 2000 the first non-PRI president was elected (Fox from PAN), in 2012 PRI returned and since 2018 morena rules. That's only for presidents. For state governments, since the revolution different parties held different states.

    • @AOE3IET
      @AOE3IET 5 років тому +225

      Not every country has a two party system where both parties are the exact same.
      Eh, who am I kidding, democracy here in Mexico is even more of a joke.
      Also I find it far more strange that homosexuality was still illegal in many parts of the U.S. in the 21st century.

    • @friendlyfoe8982
      @friendlyfoe8982 5 років тому +3

      How?

    • @rcm926
      @rcm926 5 років тому +21

      Can I just point out that Mexico is Catholic, so maybe there is a reason for that

  • @no4pls127
    @no4pls127 5 років тому +2327

    Wow never knew homosexuality was illegal in some parts of the US until like 2003.

    • @DanMan9820
      @DanMan9820 5 років тому +494

      Yeah, the Supreme Court declared anti-sodomy laws unconstitutional then.

    • @OneJazzyBoye
      @OneJazzyBoye 5 років тому +776

      @@makeprussiaathingagain7368
      Your channel tells us everything we need to know about you lmao. Bad bait, 13 year old.

    • @sonoftheway3528
      @sonoftheway3528 5 років тому +356

      +Make Prussia a thing again you want there to be less women available for you?
      must be gay...

    • @weekasi1
      @weekasi1 5 років тому +15

      @@makeprussiaathingagain7368 ua-cam.com/video/05n8S2p5XU4/v-deo.html

    • @iyoungblood2109
      @iyoungblood2109 5 років тому +209

      Keep in mind though that the law wasn't always really enforced. So in the few decades leading up to '03 there was rarely any legal repercussions for being homosexual, despite its illegality.

  • @ali_da_one
    @ali_da_one Рік тому +50

    I know this video is outdated but i would like to say Canada banned conversion therapy nationwide in 2022 😊

  • @rodgarana2953
    @rodgarana2953 3 роки тому +28

    One of the reasons Mexico lost territory was because we abolished slavery first but many US immigrants living in Texas didn’t agree to, therefore they started supporting the insurrection movements in the state.

    • @jossguerrero277
      @jossguerrero277 9 місяців тому

      Also Polk send destabilizers to make the American inmigrants a lot more "Pro US" and fight the "Mexican Tyranny", he was a Megalomaniac and people in the US still celebrating that

    • @tezbertzero1915
      @tezbertzero1915 8 місяців тому

      Esa es, meter gringos a que habiten territorios para luego hacer revueltas y apropiárselos. La misma que hicieron a España con Florida y muchas mas naciones.

  • @ericnorris5318
    @ericnorris5318 5 років тому +1831

    Ontario, 2003: People are now allowed to marry their partner, no matter if they are gay or straight
    Texas, 2003: Gov't is telling us we gotta be okay with y'all being gay

    • @1000eau
      @1000eau 4 роки тому +63

      *Supreme Court

    • @TapOnX
      @TapOnX 4 роки тому +169

      Based Texas

    • @_ch1pset
      @_ch1pset 4 роки тому +108

      From what I understand, in the later years of those laws, they were seldom enforced. Still though, the maximum punishment iirc, in Texas at least, until 2003 was death.

    • @GeorgiosLeo
      @GeorgiosLeo 4 роки тому +23

      @Heartbreakingly _ are u stupid why is it right that homosexual can be married

    • @GeorgiosLeo
      @GeorgiosLeo 4 роки тому +19

      @Heartbreakingly _ yeah that's very sad

  • @bogdanshymanovski
    @bogdanshymanovski 5 років тому +891

    0:49
    Mexico: bans slavery
    Texas: *no*

    • @thedoublessymbol
      @thedoublessymbol 4 роки тому +53

      *revolution intensifies*

    • @itande0551
      @itande0551 3 роки тому +57

      And that is why the only state we don't like from the USA is Texas

    • @itsohaya4096
      @itsohaya4096 3 роки тому +21

      @@itande0551 there's a lot more in-fighting than just that lol

    • @itande0551
      @itande0551 3 роки тому +6

      @@itsohaya4096 I mean it caused all the rest...

    • @SSMAN288
      @SSMAN288 3 роки тому +8

      @@itande0551 then why are so many people moving there?

  • @yungamerica37
    @yungamerica37 4 роки тому +44

    Connecticut- "I hope we are too small for people to see that we enforced segregation laws until 1963"

    • @h.d.5194
      @h.d.5194 Рік тому

      Lol. Didn't every state though

  • @emoAnarchist
    @emoAnarchist 2 роки тому +106

    i would have liked to have seen something about the treatment of the native population under minority civil rights, cause that was a very different story handled very differently by both countries.. and much more recently than most people think.

    • @Biipo3431
      @Biipo3431 2 роки тому +13

      **Cough cough** yeah Canada **cough cough**

    • @emoAnarchist
      @emoAnarchist 2 роки тому +5

      @@Biipo3431 canada may be worse, but neither country is good.

    • @alreadyblack3341
      @alreadyblack3341 2 роки тому

      The boot doesn't ask the bug if it's doing well.

    • @emoAnarchist
      @emoAnarchist 2 роки тому +17

      @@alreadyblack3341 wow, so edgy.. did your mom tell you that was clever?

    • @alreadyblack3341
      @alreadyblack3341 2 роки тому

      @@emoAnarchist POV nuts itch

  • @thomasturner6980
    @thomasturner6980 5 років тому +3903

    Next video: history of human rights in North Korea
    It will be your easiest video yet

    • @polos3516
      @polos3516 5 років тому +263

      Only red. Hahahahha like communism

    • @muscovymapping8896
      @muscovymapping8896 5 років тому +160

      One frame is all that is needed

    • @NoFace-Killah
      @NoFace-Killah 5 років тому +124

      *Stays red perpetually*

    • @kaiserwilhelmii2251
      @kaiserwilhelmii2251 5 років тому +101

      Best Korea has the best human rights in the world

    • @maxmustermann4149
      @maxmustermann4149 5 років тому +53

      @@polos3516 Greetings from Germany to Poland. Am quite envious that your country isn't cucked and multiculturalistic as Germany. Stay strong.

  • @valentinhanriot-colin5797
    @valentinhanriot-colin5797 5 років тому +2821

    1970
    Idaho: From now on, people will be able to love each other freely regardless of their sexuality !
    One year later
    Idaho: Nope, juste kidding

    • @---uf2zl
      @---uf2zl 5 років тому +87

      For real, what happened ?

    • @seannolan9857
      @seannolan9857 5 років тому +292

      I'm guessing the incumbent state legislatures lost big-time in the 1970 elections.

    • @garretsheets3080
      @garretsheets3080 5 років тому +93

      Bengali - Change is a pendulum. Sometimes it swings harder than others. There were a few times slavery went from being illegal to legal back to illegal in parts of the US as well.

    • @Nordisk11
      @Nordisk11 5 років тому +36

      based idaho lmao

    • @wannabehistorian371
      @wannabehistorian371 5 років тому +24

      *Curb Your Enthusiasm theme*

  • @somestickmanboi9458
    @somestickmanboi9458 4 роки тому +194

    "So segregation is still legal?"
    Mexico and Canada: *Well yes*

    • @charanth182
      @charanth182 4 роки тому +66

      All the map shows is we don't have a law specifically mentioning segregation (as it wasn't as big here) . We have plenty of laws saying we can't treat anyone differently because of their race/gender/etc.

    • @victorcontreras5342
      @victorcontreras5342 4 роки тому +36

      In mexico the segregation didn't existed as much as i know.

    • @Joridiy
      @Joridiy 4 роки тому +47

      @@victorcontreras5342 It didn't exist. That's why we laugh at Usonians with their silly racial stuff. We only had the "castas" system which was totally forgotten and useless Because everyone was banging everyone so Nobody could actually be pure of a race.

    • @eldelostacos9980
      @eldelostacos9980 4 роки тому +30

      Well, neither of them ever had a serious segregation problem as far as I know, so there hasn't been a need to make a law banning something that rarely, if ever, happens. I guess is because Canadians have been more liberal than Americans in that sense and Mexicans are so mixed-race that such a thing would be impossible

    • @Dave_thenerd
      @Dave_thenerd 4 роки тому +15

      I'm Canadian, as far as I know since the end of the American Civil War, during which many former slaves fled to Canada as Slavery had been out lawed for like 30 years here. There have never been any laws enforcing segregation. Segregation still existed to varying degree however. His video is missing critical information like that in 1977 Canada passed its first comprehensive human rights law (there were British laws before this too) which banned segregation by explicitly. Unlike the U.S. a large portion of Black Canadians never experienced the level of segregation that Black Americans did. Though, natives, that's another story, a very shameful one. See:
      ansa.novascotia.ca/content/african-heritage-month-narratives-week-three#:~:text=Canada%27s%20History%20of%20Segregation&text=Historically%2C%20while%20Canada%20did%20not,allowed%20private%20businesses%20to%20discriminate.

  • @voli293
    @voli293 3 роки тому +174

    Whether you like it or not things have definitely gotten better since the past decades.

  • @stefanomagari6921
    @stefanomagari6921 5 років тому +2733

    Can you make something similar with Europe, it would be very interesting

    • @iamothemakhnovist20
      @iamothemakhnovist20 5 років тому +46

      Khey Pard recently did that for homosexuality

    • @bonogiamboni4830
      @bonogiamboni4830 5 років тому +45

      Well rather than one or two centuries to go through there are a few millennia so it could be a bit harder to go from the 8th century bc (1st olympiad and therefore start of greece, as well as foundation of rome, so between both the start of europe) to 2019 ad, especially considering that for most of the early history europe, particularly in the north, wasn't really made of states and kingdoms but of coalitions of villages. Also 1 the hre's maps are complex and 2 spoiler alert but after the fall of greece and rome which were tolerant of gays and scientists, the church takes over and pretty much cancels human rights until the enlightenment.

    • @daPawlak
      @daPawlak 5 років тому +46

      @@bonogiamboni4830 your spoiler alert is half bs at very least. Rome was tolerant only in religious terms. It was Christianity adopting to Roman rigid cultural norms, not the other way around that created values we currently associate with Christianity.

    • @bonogiamboni4830
      @bonogiamboni4830 5 років тому +2

      @@daPawlak huh maybe i mixed up rome and greece a bit.

    • @sojourner.
      @sojourner. 5 років тому +7

      Socialist policies in Europe lmao: "Amaze your eyes with Germany's social welfare program during the forties!"

  • @Jacob-yg7lz
    @Jacob-yg7lz 5 років тому +2027

    You should've included banning marital rape. It's honestly pretty shocking how recent it happened in the US, with bans starting primarily in the 70s and with the last states banning it being Oklahoma and North Carolina in 1993.

    • @treyebillups8602
      @treyebillups8602 5 років тому +31

      Wait... in those two states, raping your wife was okay until 1992? I can’t believe that.

    • @DeoVindice999
      @DeoVindice999 4 роки тому +76

      @@treyebillups8602 I don't believe it was legal to rape your wife, it was more like they didn't think a man having intercourse with his wife against her will counted as rape. A woman was expected to serve her husband whenever he wanted. Therefore, raping your wife was not possible.

    • @yogatonga7529
      @yogatonga7529 3 роки тому +26

      Same for Germany

    • @keepingbloodpuretypenation5906
      @keepingbloodpuretypenation5906 3 роки тому +5

      @@treyebillups8602 And i can't belive that rapeing our wife or husband is illegal in U.S right now you people are insane dumb and ignorant zpoiled brats

    • @The_mrbob
      @The_mrbob 2 роки тому +118

      @@keepingbloodpuretypenation5906 I- what? I genuinely hope you're just some 10 year old troll.

  • @Randomdive
    @Randomdive 3 роки тому +94

    Shouts out to Illinois decriminalizing homosexuality like 10 years ahead of the pack

    • @a_human8489
      @a_human8489 3 роки тому +12

      Mexico decriminalized homosexuality before 1900. Now they couldn’t marry and women couldn’t vote but still

    • @reizayin
      @reizayin 2 роки тому +1

      Too bad they went farther.

    • @italia689
      @italia689 5 місяців тому

      ​@@a_human8489
      Priorities. First things first, dude!

  • @Mayoralink64
    @Mayoralink64 2 роки тому +61

    I mean you could technically also make the state divisions for Mexico, as each state has its own issues with Same-sex marriage that differ from what federal law dicates (as technically, federally, same-sex marriage is legal already). But I love your videos

  • @x999uuu1
    @x999uuu1 5 років тому +156

    You got the Slavery part wrong for Upper Canada. The law passed in 1792 barred anymore people from becoming slaves, and freed all children of slaves on their 21st birthday, but it didn't make slavery illegal outright.
    This led to the historically ironic position of Upper Canada slaves escaping to Michigan to become free until 1833.

    • @Michrailfan
      @Michrailfan 2 роки тому +15

      Huh this is interesting... there's a really old building in my Michigan town where our founder hid slaves

    • @bastobasto4866
      @bastobasto4866 9 місяців тому +6

      Similarly, Lower Canada technically (and accidentally) had women suffrage for much of it's history, and so earlier than most other regions shown here - simply due to the fact that voting was land/wealth-based (forgot which one), and that rich widows just weren't accounted for at all (so there weren't any restrictions on voting based on gender, and the rare women who had the necessary wealth/land were allowed to vote).

    • @Ravie3
      @Ravie3 5 місяців тому

      @@bastobasto4866It was the exact same scenario in regards to women voting in New Jersey and some of those other states really early on. There were property requirements, but the law didn’t specify that voters had to be male, which meant that some widows (husbands were considered in charge of their wives’ property) could end up with the vote.

  • @raulgonzalez8564
    @raulgonzalez8564 5 років тому +823

    Title: The History Of Civil Rights in the US and Canada:every year
    *Shows Mexico*
    Me: ok.
    Edit: *Oh yea don't forget **-Greenland-*

    • @evandevries7679
      @evandevries7679 5 років тому +56

      Raúl González Maybes it’s because he didn’t go in to detail on legality in each state in Mexico

    • @Argacyan
      @Argacyan 5 років тому +18

      like half of the US today used to be spanish territory and either directly or indirectly part of Mexico / New Spain. The video begins in the 18th century. (edit: more than half, you can see it yourself)

    • @chisank
      @chisank 5 років тому +14

      Evan DeVries and a tiny bit of russia

    • @alphamikeomega5728
      @alphamikeomega5728 5 років тому +21

      He also includes a slither of Cuba, hence the "Slavery is legal" marker up to 1886.

    • @laughable6650
      @laughable6650 5 років тому +4

      He should have just said North America.

  • @sabrinakirchner242
    @sabrinakirchner242 2 роки тому +38

    Logically I knew how recently gay marriage was legalized nationwide in the US because I remember it happening when I was in middle school. But at the same time, because I was a kid at the time, that feels like a really long time ago. This video really put it into perspective.

    • @Jay_Johnson
      @Jay_Johnson 2 роки тому

      I mean it was only 2003 that federally repealed laws against homosexual acts.less than 20 years ago….

  • @Downbubbles2
    @Downbubbles2 2 роки тому +109

    I’m all for having different taste and opinions, but to go as far as to HATE someone because of their sexuality, race, religion, ethnicity, it’s unbelievable to me.

    • @JohnnyDeere
      @JohnnyDeere 2 роки тому +14

      I can understand why it's unbelievable to hate someone for their sexuality, race, gender, ethnicity, etc. That's just plain stupid. I can't say the same about religion. People hating each other for different religions is damn near impossible to prevent. It's a sad but very much real problem in modern society. I'm not saying I'm all for murdering someone because they pray to the wrong god, but trying to end a centuries old rivalry between 2 dominant religions such as Christianity and Islam is like trying to climb a mountain using only your fingernails. It's a hard, long, arduous, and dangerous task and it's almost impossible to do so. Maybe one day there'll be peace. But until then, there's no preventing 2 pitbulls from barking at each other.

    • @Rubbix_IS_here
      @Rubbix_IS_here 2 роки тому +8

      I mean religion plays a role in hating sexuality,I mean,Im a Catholic and don't support LGBTQ but I still don't get why people outright HATE people.I just respect them and pray but nothing else.

    • @Rubbix_IS_here
      @Rubbix_IS_here 2 роки тому +2

      @@JohnnyDeere Nice profile picture you got there👍

    • @chrisdonish
      @chrisdonish 9 місяців тому

      ​@@JohnnyDeereits not just about worshipping the wrong god, muslims will always be a source of religious conflict because their method of spreading was historically always by conquest and force. No other religions engaged in violence on the level that did muslims did.

    • @VivaCristoRei9
      @VivaCristoRei9 9 місяців тому

      Ban sodomy

  • @Frankenbutt99
    @Frankenbutt99 5 років тому +273

    Nobody:
    New Jersey in 1807: women ain’t real chief

    • @seannolan9857
      @seannolan9857 5 років тому +29

      For most of the 19th century, the primary argument was that women didn't have souls, so they couldn't vote.

    • @kaiserwilhelmii2251
      @kaiserwilhelmii2251 5 років тому +4

      Epic

    • @vituzui9070
      @vituzui9070 5 років тому +2

      @@seannolan9857 I don't know where you got that idea but it's just not true.

    • @seannolan9857
      @seannolan9857 5 років тому +10

      @@vituzui9070 Religioustolerance.org listed it as one of their examples of things the religious right used to argue, but eventually came to the mainstream conclusion. Right along with the ideas that blacks are descendants of Ham, and therefore deserve enslavement, and that Jews were replaced by Gentiles as the chosen people.

    • @SloveneAnon
      @SloveneAnon 5 років тому +3

      @@seannolan9857 Actually women not having souls started as a smear pamphlet against the Catholic church some 17th century Lutheran pastor wrote. In actuality claiming women don't have souls is a grave heresy in Catholicism and no such claims were ever made. Please stop perpetuating old Protestant propaganda. I bet you believe the church banned people from believing the earth is round or some other such nonsense.
      www.commonwealmagazine.org/do-women-have-souls

  • @Varan12341
    @Varan12341 5 років тому +427

    Knowing the comments on history channels, this is a very ballsy thing to post man. Nice video nonetheless.

    • @Vitorruy1
      @Vitorruy1 3 роки тому +42

      A lot of reactionary folks unfortunally 😔

    • @Mypromiselive
      @Mypromiselive 3 роки тому +2

      Dahm that name and pic, nj

    • @lightblue254
      @lightblue254 2 роки тому

      For sure, a very good video indeed.

    • @AVI-lh6rm
      @AVI-lh6rm 2 роки тому +1

      @@Mypromiselive goes so hard (feel free to screenshot)

  • @GOODYGOODGOOD789
    @GOODYGOODGOOD789 3 місяці тому +4

    An update on conversation therapy in the U.S. and Canada (as of May 9th, 2024): Canada has banned conversation therapy since this video, and 22 states in the U.S. have banned it (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington), and it's also illegal in Puerto Rico. Also, same-sex marriage is legal in Mexico now.

  • @JamieElli
    @JamieElli 9 місяців тому +15

    Why does the South always have to be the worst.

    • @Goebber15
      @Goebber15 9 місяців тому +2

      The best*

    • @AlCatSplat
      @AlCatSplat 9 місяців тому +5

      @@Goebber15 cringe

    • @FakeMistercandle
      @FakeMistercandle 9 місяців тому

      Top 10 people who are confidently incorrect
      @@Goebber15

  • @starmaker75
    @starmaker75 5 років тому +474

    I’ll will bet this comment section will be nice and civil

    • @julianodobler2782
      @julianodobler2782 5 років тому +130

      The nazi wannabes are already here sadly

    • @julianodobler2782
      @julianodobler2782 5 років тому +18

      @Alexis Hazel DeSilva indeed, my apologies

    • @covjekapsurda2673
      @covjekapsurda2673 5 років тому +32

      @Alexis Hazel DeSilva they are joke. If their life isnt one complete joke, they would not be nazis.

    • @zeuskf62
      @zeuskf62 5 років тому +30

      Okay Jesus y'all, nazis are the ones following all of Hitler's ideology, these might be something like fascists but the same exists in both left and right and it's normal, such people exist and have these ideas
      NOTE: I am a Greek right-wing leaning guy, don't get me involved with any USA stuff

    • @ira1420
      @ira1420 5 років тому +5

      I will'll*

  • @gaveferia1421
    @gaveferia1421 5 років тому +658

    You forgot to add the history of gamer rights
    Not like it would do anything because we never had any

  • @pretzelearthsociety9975
    @pretzelearthsociety9975 4 роки тому +107

    You know, it's kinda nice to see the progress that the US has made over the years. Despite its imperfections, they're still realising that equality should be there for all. Well done America!

    • @bradley8575
      @bradley8575 2 роки тому +31

      Wow it’s pretty rare to see a comment from someone like you thanks for the wonderful comment.

    • @Jay-pq7nf
      @Jay-pq7nf 2 роки тому +3

      Bruh what about the other country Canada lol

    • @bl1tz533
      @bl1tz533 2 роки тому

      So do we have any good logical reason to accept gays or is it all appeals to apathy, and then the lamest name calling in town

    • @harrisonkarn2078
      @harrisonkarn2078 2 роки тому +19

      @@Jay-pq7nf Canada has pretty similar problems to us, they’re just a few years ahead of us in solving them.

    • @chocolizard678
      @chocolizard678 2 роки тому +2

      Thanks for the positive take

  • @Nopal998
    @Nopal998 2 роки тому +58

    Fun fact: The first article of the Mexican Constitution actually prohibits discrimination based on sexual preferences. (AKA, if you're a gay Mexican like me, you're protected by the Mexican Constitution if you're a Mexican Citizen.)

  • @deggs5589
    @deggs5589 5 років тому +416

    Greenland ahead of the game

    • @EugeneAyindolmah
      @EugeneAyindolmah 5 років тому +107

      Denmark

    • @lapisleafuli1817
      @lapisleafuli1817 5 років тому +73

      Thats the nordics for ya.

    • @coltbolt6193
      @coltbolt6193 5 років тому +36

      like only 1 person lives there. He/she's so thirst that they'll legalise gay marrage, ban slavery and/or let women vote to get anyone over

    • @unovasfinest2623
      @unovasfinest2623 5 років тому +32

      Scandinavia: How bout we actually educate our kids?
      Everyone else: Wait a minute... thats never been done before 🤭

    • @berndmeyer5297
      @berndmeyer5297 5 років тому +16

      Greenland is speed-running.

  • @jevinliu4658
    @jevinliu4658 5 років тому +208

    Wow... I never knew how ubiquitous the segregation movement was in the United States... that literally my home state voted it into law at one point...

    • @josepho3366
      @josepho3366 3 роки тому

      @Ryan McCreedy it was actually illegal there, must’ve been an error.

    • @Vitorruy1
      @Vitorruy1 3 роки тому +25

      Yes most young people dont know about it because they tried to swipe that ugly history under the rug, look up "massive resistance" after segregation was banned they closed schools just so black children couldnt go.

    • @lukeporras1288
      @lukeporras1288 3 роки тому +11

      Yes, it existed north and south. Racism was a national affair, yet most history books just focus on the south.

    • @Gorg-oe1hu
      @Gorg-oe1hu 2 роки тому +3

      @@lukeporras1288 I've met more racist people in Michigan then I did in Alabama.

    • @AlteFore
      @AlteFore 2 роки тому

      Every state did that around 200 years ago, it was trendy back then

  • @Adrianadrian173
    @Adrianadrian173 4 роки тому +66

    I find it quite amazing how quickly the legalisation of homosexuality and especially gay marriage occurred. It took decades, if not at least a century, for all regions/states to grant women the right to vote and abolish slavery, yet only about 10 years for all provinces and states to legalise gay marriage. Incredible really.

    • @nathanh2917
      @nathanh2917 2 роки тому +10

      Yet in the most free period in history all people talk about is how oppressed we still are instead of being thank full we werent born in an earlier time.

    • @lordyharim7636
      @lordyharim7636 2 роки тому +65

      @@nathanh2917 That doesn't mean we can't try and make it better. It doesn't mean we're ungrateful, it's that we still see major flaws.

    • @greywolf7577
      @greywolf7577 2 роки тому

      In the US, gay marriage was legalized from a Supreme Court decision. The court is strongly Conservative now. If it overturns its previous decision, I can see many states banning gay marriage again.

    • @LeakyTrees
      @LeakyTrees 2 роки тому +29

      @@nathanh2917 I'm grateful I'm not in the 1980s, but we're still oppressed and we can't stop fighting until we all have well enforced equal rights.

    • @holoangie9106
      @holoangie9106 2 роки тому +5

      Bro being gay was illegal in my literal hometown and was only legalized because every other state was legalizing it please tell me this is a joke

  • @JHamron
    @JHamron 9 місяців тому +12

    While it feels like everything can be really frustrating today this is a helpful reminder that things have and will get better. Hope to see the version with trans and abortion rights in 10 years!

  • @frederickvagueson9670
    @frederickvagueson9670 5 років тому +394

    That’s a weird looking Roman Empire

    • @garrettallen7427
      @garrettallen7427 5 років тому +31

      Yeah, Italy really let itself go, I’m afraid...

    • @ddiamond6535
      @ddiamond6535 5 років тому +25

      America is the true Third Rome.

    • @aglassofmilk5779
      @aglassofmilk5779 5 років тому +4

      Harrison Colborne-Veel America is the fourth rome

    • @ddiamond6535
      @ddiamond6535 5 років тому +3

      a glass of milk Then what was the Third Rome?

    • @aglassofmilk5779
      @aglassofmilk5779 5 років тому +12

      Panteleimon Ponomarenko the Russian Empire, they were the center of orthodox Christianity and their monarchs were called tsars/czars, which meant Caesar like from Ancient Rome

  • @peterluskey3829
    @peterluskey3829 5 років тому +256

    Freedom of religion, especially for Catholics, was also a problem in Canada, the United States and even Mexico all the way into the 20th century, and is even disputed today in some respects.

    • @jacobfinch9563
      @jacobfinch9563 5 років тому +36

      Peter Luskey Mexico? Catholics are the majority there

    • @talhahhussain5603
      @talhahhussain5603 5 років тому +57

      @@jacobfinch9563 I'm pretty sure the government cracked down on the Catholic Church in Mexico at one point (Source: HOI4).

    • @Josue-mv2fo
      @Josue-mv2fo 5 років тому +29

      @@talhahhussain5603
      Yeah they did so in the 30's, and also propped up this Pentecoastal alternative called "La Luz del Mundo" (The Light of the World)

    • @thetigerking2613
      @thetigerking2613 5 років тому +5

      Protestant > Catholic

    • @matthewlambert5364
      @matthewlambert5364 5 років тому +14

      The majority of canadians are catholics of some kind

  • @DualTheEggist
    @DualTheEggist 9 місяців тому +22

    I hope we get an updated version of this map showing Trans rights under LGBT+ civil rights. Sadly they're currently being stripped away.

    • @Goebber15
      @Goebber15 9 місяців тому +4

      Trans rights shouldn’t have even been a thing in the first place. Kids should not be making life changing decisions, men should not be in woman’s bathrooms, nor should a woman be in a man’s. This is common sense

    • @faby_baby
      @faby_baby 9 місяців тому +1

      @@Goebber15real

    • @Skibidivm_Latrinae
      @Skibidivm_Latrinae 9 місяців тому

      @@Goebber15real moment

    • @dazurathefirst8456
      @dazurathefirst8456 9 місяців тому +8

      @@Goebber15 Just make restrooms gender neutral. Problem solved there. And despite what your feelings tell you, science points to otherwise :) Unless you'd like to see a massive jump in suicides. Trans rights saves lives and prevents medical burdens on healthcare from various issues that stems from transexual individuals suffering from mental disorders due to their healthcare being denied to them. The only "life changing" decision kids do regarding trans is choosing to identify as another gender by using different pronouns, wearing gender appropriate clothing, and acting in line with the gender they identify with. Which can all easily be stopped. Any story you've heard about kids performing life altering surgeries simply does not happen. Go to Russia or Iran if you think this should be the norm.

    • @casual_speedrunner1482
      @casual_speedrunner1482 9 місяців тому +2

      ​@Benjamin_NetanjahuIt's all projection with these guys. They want to touch children, so they have to assume that you do, too.

  • @HeloFish
    @HeloFish 2 роки тому +26

    *puts on hazmat suit*
    *sorts by newest first*

  • @Pimpeaux
    @Pimpeaux 5 років тому +146

    U.S.: "Man, this whole civil rights thing is HARD!"
    Greenland: 0:28 1:51 2:12

    • @rigelbound6749
      @rigelbound6749 5 років тому +40

      I don't know if you're aware but the US is a country inhabited by 330 million people of many, many different ethnicities while Greenland is a territory inhabited by roughly 56,000 people whom are pretty much just Danish or Inuit. You can't compare the two at all.

    • @andirichards7371
      @andirichards7371 5 років тому +33

      Greenland is a rock in the middle of the sea. The US was a rising superpower, it had more to deal with than Greenland.

    • @Pimpeaux
      @Pimpeaux 5 років тому +42

      Yes, those are fair points. I just think it's funny to contrast how early Greenland/Denmark got everything done.

    • @turkoositerapsidi
      @turkoositerapsidi 5 років тому +1

      It is Kalaallit Nunaat and it real American peopls land, yo idiots Usa / Canada ar illegal imigrants gone too far, in Kalaallit Nunaat ther ar only about 10% dansk peopl.

    • @everettduncan7543
      @everettduncan7543 5 років тому +6

      Greenland is mostly inuit, and native americans tend to be more liberal regarding civil rights

  • @MrGrmblhmpf
    @MrGrmblhmpf 5 років тому +42

    Am I the only one to read abolition: banned by law and was confused?

    • @talhahhussain5603
      @talhahhussain5603 5 років тому +1

      I mean, there was the Congressional gag rule if that counts, but to my knowledge, abolitionism has never been illegal in the United States. :P

  • @that1valentian769
    @that1valentian769 Рік тому +9

    Might wanna update this. After 151 years of stagnant LGBTQ rights, Mexico has just legalized same sex marriage.

  • @leaderunith4l324
    @leaderunith4l324 2 роки тому +15

    I swear to god, it’s like the south needs to be dragged kicking and screaming by the federal government for even the slightest bit of progress to be made

    • @golagiswatchingyou2966
      @golagiswatchingyou2966 2 роки тому +2

      should have just let them go but can't have the empire if you do, gatta have that cannon fodder for wars.

    • @casual_speedrunner1482
      @casual_speedrunner1482 2 роки тому +1

      @@golagiswatchingyou2966 It’s better to have homophobic racists die than actual human people.

    • @mr.fahrenheit7009
      @mr.fahrenheit7009 2 роки тому

      Well if your talking about slavery the south really relied on slavery for the economy and most slave owners were just people Who had slaves for help the owners works with their slaves so I don't think you should be surprised when people are reluctant to give up what they own and use to make money

  • @GGG1113331
    @GGG1113331 5 років тому +379

    Great video as always but a point of correction: Conversion therapy is not illegal in California. It can be used on anyone 18 or older. If the client is a minor/under the age of 18, then it's prohibited (unless they emancipated before the age of 18. Then it becomes a huge grey area). Keep up the great videos!

    • @robertcouchman6069
      @robertcouchman6069 5 років тому +1

      The video shows it as legal

    • @danielc2310
      @danielc2310 5 років тому +15

      Nick Vasquez So far that is true for all of the states that have banned conversion therapy. That is one of the next steps.

    • @jthejedigaming8303
      @jthejedigaming8303 5 років тому +97

      Conversion therapy should be banned and outlawed

    • @thetigerking2613
      @thetigerking2613 5 років тому +38

      Jthejedigaming If it’s an adult doing it I don’t see the problem.

    • @lamegaming9835
      @lamegaming9835 4 роки тому +9

      Jthejedigaming its a persons choice on who they want to be

  • @FOLIPE
    @FOLIPE 5 років тому +52

    Maybe something similar but for worker's rights would also be interesting

    • @thomasgrabkowski8283
      @thomasgrabkowski8283 4 роки тому +4

      F. OPE USA(southern states) and Mexico being far behind Canada

  • @morris9974
    @morris9974 4 роки тому +32

    Unbelievable that till 2002 there where us states where homosexuality was illegal

    • @dmeads5663
      @dmeads5663 4 роки тому +7

      Well it’s not like it was enforced, there just wasn’t any laws that decriminalized it.

    • @haltair4015
      @haltair4015 4 роки тому +2

      @@dmeads5663 It was enforced sporadically... but yea it was more for the symbol of it I guess

    • @dmeads5663
      @dmeads5663 4 роки тому +1

      Haltaïr where was it enforced?

    • @betaplain297
      @betaplain297 4 роки тому +5

      Unbelievable that the US is the only country to NOT enforce the UN Convention of the rights of the child
      (Except for like Somalia)

    • @giggoty4926
      @giggoty4926 4 роки тому +1

      in iran and saudi arabia they hang gay

  • @kie6478
    @kie6478 3 роки тому +15

    Legal racial segregation existed in Ontario until 1996 (the last place being chatham ontario) and it was also legal in Quebec and Nova Scotia. The Supreme Court of Canada upheld racial segregation well into the 20th century until Canada got a constitution near the end of the 20th century.

  • @axellaurence722
    @axellaurence722 5 років тому +26

    You, Ollie Bye, and Khey Pard are the trifecta of mapping

  • @Matthew_Mukhin
    @Matthew_Mukhin 5 років тому +261

    Make a similar video about Europe please.

    • @quasar4780
      @quasar4780 5 років тому

      good idea

    • @HomoChomsky
      @HomoChomsky 5 років тому +25

      @@_blank-_ , is there a copyright on this idea?
      (The answer is no)

    • @donaldscroto8098
      @donaldscroto8098 5 років тому +13

      @@_blank-_ it's not stolen, he did it with North America and he added women suffrage and slavery

    • @alejandroojeda1572
      @alejandroojeda1572 5 років тому

      Much more interesting with miltiple backs and forths

    • @bradley8575
      @bradley8575 2 роки тому

      A Video about Europe would be similar except without Segregation. Stuff because except Nazi German segregation was rare in Europe but people of color in Europe before ww2 were rare

  • @TSGPhilipp
    @TSGPhilipp 3 роки тому +30

    I was born in 2004 and its wild to me that there was a time in the 21th century, where Homosexuality was illegal in a big part of the US

    • @TransGirlGaming
      @TransGirlGaming 2 роки тому

      I was born the same year it was decriminalized in my state NC, 2003

  • @oucyan
    @oucyan Рік тому +10

    Mexico being based and decriminalizing homosexuality all the way back in 1871.

  • @ekmalsukarno2302
    @ekmalsukarno2302 5 років тому +146

    Can you please make a video on the 1963 confrontation between Malaysia and Indonesia. Please accept my request.

    • @ekmalsukarno2302
      @ekmalsukarno2302 5 років тому +14

      In 1963, two former British colonies in Borneo were about to become part to Malaysia, but Indonesia wanted to these two former British colonies for itself, and that was how the conflict started. This link will explain more information. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indonesia%E2%80%93Malaysia_confrontation

    • @nilz5909
      @nilz5909 5 років тому

      Ekmal Sukarno we didn't want it for ourselves. It was because we saw the release of the 2 colonies as a British neo-imperialist plot

    • @ekmalsukarno2302
      @ekmalsukarno2302 5 років тому +2

      Nilz Mekel As a British neo-imperialist plot to what? Take over Indonesia?

  • @robertkirby8685
    @robertkirby8685 5 років тому +32

    Utah in 1971: You know what, it shouldn't be illegal for someone to love a person of the same gender.
    Utah in 1972: Nah, change my mind. I forgot that I'm the crazy Mormon state.

    • @gabrielagustinhomas
      @gabrielagustinhomas 2 роки тому +2

      Well, not EVERYONE in Utah is a Mormon. That's actually a bit of a sterotype. I may not like the LDS Church, too, but I WILL say that the Mormons have become a little bit better over time. Blacks weren't allowed to be missionaries, but that changed in the 1970's. Also, missionaries don't have to wear those stupid "bulletproof" underwear garments anymore.

    • @TheHaydena76
      @TheHaydena76 2 роки тому +3

      Crazy?

    • @wyomed
      @wyomed 2 роки тому

      Braindead take

  • @KageTheDanish
    @KageTheDanish 2 роки тому +8

    Coming back here after half a year and yep, this comment section is still just as toxic.

  • @Woistwahrheit
    @Woistwahrheit Рік тому +9

    FIRST they wanted to take my slaves THEN they decided to let my wife have a say, what next, they let dishwashers marry eachother?!?!?

  • @OfficeSupplyRobot
    @OfficeSupplyRobot 5 років тому +22

    Good job on the history map again, Emperor Tigerstar. I'm a big fan of the channel because I'm a cartography nut.

  • @severinvogt2875
    @severinvogt2875 5 років тому +38

    You can see a bit of Russia in the top left in Alaska early on

    • @turkoositerapsidi
      @turkoositerapsidi 5 років тому +2

      Аляска vas Russian befor 1867.

    • @yogatonga7529
      @yogatonga7529 3 роки тому

      I thought homosexuality became only illegal in 1835?

  • @RedHoodedWraith
    @RedHoodedWraith 2 роки тому +6

    I swear the UA-cam algorithm has a sick sense of humor recommending this video rn

    • @lollo_C
      @lollo_C 2 роки тому

      Why?

    • @RedHoodedWraith
      @RedHoodedWraith 2 роки тому +3

      @@lollo_C Roe v. Wade being overturned recently

    • @lollo_C
      @lollo_C 2 роки тому

      @@RedHoodedWraith o yea

  • @nikolanahirni5093
    @nikolanahirni5093 4 роки тому +14

    1865: Slavery ended
    1920: All women can now vote
    2003: Being gay isn't illegal anymore

    • @jhoff1978
      @jhoff1978 4 роки тому

      Just look at how far the US has come

    • @legrandliseurtri7495
      @legrandliseurtri7495 4 роки тому

      Except in Quebec, for the voting part.

    • @ozziemahboi
      @ozziemahboi 4 роки тому

      @Έλληνας Εθνικιστής What are you trying to say?

    • @ozziemahboi
      @ozziemahboi 4 роки тому

      @Έλληνας Εθνικιστής Well i know.

    • @ozziemahboi
      @ozziemahboi 4 роки тому

      @Έλληνας Εθνικιστής But i disagree with you. Just because you hate people different genders doesn't mean we devolved.

  • @im_not_political2026
    @im_not_political2026 5 років тому +19

    > Be me.
    > Notice Mexico both abolished slavery and decriminalized homosexuality before America.
    > “Wow we really had a long way to go.”
    > Also notice Mexico gave women the right to vote in 1953.
    > *Explode In jingoistic pride*

    • @cristeromexico3366
      @cristeromexico3366 4 роки тому +7

      It’s because our Revolutionary government thought giving women the right to vote would increase the influence of the Catholic Church. Since they thought women would be more closer to the Church and our post Revolution government was extremely anti-clerical

  • @tossybros.6899
    @tossybros.6899 5 років тому +27

    (Greenland not included)
    0:11 Slavery Starts becoming Legal
    0:11 Women's Rights becoming Legal
    0:31 Women's Rights becoming Illegal everywhere
    0:56 Women's rights start becoming Legal again
    1:18 13th Amendment Begins (Slavery being Illegal unless for crime)
    1:19 14th Amendment Begins (Slaves being able to get U.S. citenzenships)
    1:21 15th Amendment Begins (Any race can vote in the U.S.)
    1:22 Segregation Begins
    1:22 LGBTQ+ rights starts becoming decriminalized (Mexico)
    2:01 19th Amendment Begins (Letting Women vote)
    2:03 Women can vote everywhere in the U.S.
    2:22 Women can vote everywhere in the U.S. and Canada
    2:35 LGBTQ+ starts becoming decriminalized (U.S.)
    2:37 Segregation becomes Banned everywhere (U.S.)
    2:41 LGBTQ+ starts becoming decriminalized everywhere (Canada)
    2:43 Equal rights amendment starts becoming legal
    3:03 Same-sex civil unions start becoming legal
    3:08 Same-sex marriage starts becoming legal
    3:10 Same-sex marriage is legal everywhere (Canada)
    3:16 Conversion Therapy starts becoming Illegal
    3:18 Same-sex marriage is legal everywhere (U.S.)

    • @chudsoyjak
      @chudsoyjak 9 місяців тому

      making conversion therapy illegal is one of the most disgusting, illogical, and stupid things known to man. People go there by choice to better themeslves, and you think its a "civil right" or some nonsense like that. Grow up, and get a life.

  • @jayclawwit6489
    @jayclawwit6489 4 роки тому +58

    I wish those people who were oppressed during those times get to live today where society is more accepting than before. Salute to those who fought the wars for civil rights, women's rights and LGBTQ+ rights.

    • @AirkaMojo
      @AirkaMojo 4 роки тому +11

      @Domašna Samoilova Contributing to it by wanting everyone to have equal rights? No one is asking for your opinion. If you don't like the idea that everyone should be treated fairly and should be able to live their own lives, then just don't pay attention to it and leave. It's that simple.

    • @AirkaMojo
      @AirkaMojo 4 роки тому +24

      @Joe Edwards Of course you believe being gay is a lifestyle, because people would obviously choose to be gay, in turn making their lives harder and choosing to be hated for their very existence, let alone the fact that in some countries being gay is punishable by death. But no, you're right, people would just choose this "lifestyle" and choose to be subjected to this hate for no real reason.

    • @nathanh2917
      @nathanh2917 2 роки тому +3

      @@AirkaMojo Being gay isnt a genetic thing. Otherwise there would be fewer and fewer. Being gay is simular to having a foot fetish but instead of feet you like the same gender. Iv got no problem with it and not much of a choice. People dont choose to be attracted to feet yet through their puberty some experiences led them to be attracted to that. Also to be fair lifestyle doesnt mean choice.

    • @storm12weather
      @storm12weather 2 роки тому +2

      @@nathanh2917 Its not a fetish, its an orientation. Let me ask you this, if someone is attracted to guys is it a fetish? Notice I left out the sex of the individual in question. The answer cannot be "yes" if its a guy attracted to guys, and "no" if it's a woman attracted to guys. Its the same attraction. Someone who is gay will naturally develop an attraction to others of the same sex through the exact same process (usually during puberty) as someone who is attracted to the opposite sex. Let me put it another way. Someone who is straight will never be sexually attracted to the same sex. Similarly someone who is gay will never be attracted to the opposite sex. And finally, a genetic trait does not need to be held by a parent for it to occur in an offspring.

    • @tomato-v8x
      @tomato-v8x 2 роки тому

      @@nathanh2917 Your comparison makes me want to kill myself.

  • @SOS-BFV
    @SOS-BFV 9 місяців тому +15

    W Mexico for decriminalizing LGBT first

    • @realizingfiction5935
      @realizingfiction5935 8 місяців тому +2

      That’s why Mexico is an L country

    • @SOS-BFV
      @SOS-BFV 8 місяців тому +10

      @@realizingfiction5935 shut up

    • @MappingCBguy
      @MappingCBguy 17 днів тому

      Said The Edgy braintrot 12 years old "sigma" kid

    • @MappingCBguy
      @MappingCBguy 17 днів тому

      ​@@realizingfiction5935True
      Mexico is a L country

  • @thomassilia7306
    @thomassilia7306 5 років тому +79

    *insert very opiniated statement here*

    • @dango6266
      @dango6266 5 років тому +28

      *Insert opionated but factually wrong argument here*

    • @skinnerz9928
      @skinnerz9928 5 років тому +18

      Awesomeman and pinkcop INSERT ANGRY BUT USELESS REBUTTAL HERE

    • @jaxpersson9610
      @jaxpersson9610 4 роки тому +10

      *Insert Random American Patriotic Comment Here*

    • @newtfigton8795
      @newtfigton8795 4 роки тому +10

      Comment bashing America goes here.

    • @jasonmartin4775
      @jasonmartin4775 4 роки тому +7

      *unrelated remark about how the South will rise again*

  • @aksmex2576
    @aksmex2576 5 років тому +123

    I didn't like this video because I don't have 3 eyes like everyone else.

    • @juanmam.2113
      @juanmam.2113 5 років тому +36

      This normie hasnt opened his third eye yet pfffftt
      *pathetic*

    • @seannolan9857
      @seannolan9857 5 років тому +8

      The pause button is your friend. Or quarter speed.

    • @MiYa-ht5hf
      @MiYa-ht5hf 5 років тому +1

      @@juanmam.2113 wat

    • @thiccchungo1041
      @thiccchungo1041 5 років тому

      Ppl that have three eye r Gei

    • @aksmex2576
      @aksmex2576 5 років тому

      @Eric Johnson it's supposed to be a joke.

  • @fireyfan25
    @fireyfan25 9 місяців тому +6

    Wyoming, 1869. Population: 9 (5 men, 4 women)
    “So, we’re going to let Ruth, Mary, Elizabeth, and Mildred vote?”
    “Sounds fine to me.”

    • @PappyP
      @PappyP 3 місяці тому

      idk how you managed to steal a comment and somehow make it 10x worse

  • @kaiseramadeus233
    @kaiseramadeus233 9 місяців тому +13

    Conservatives are not happy seeing this video

  • @PandorasCradle
    @PandorasCradle 5 років тому +39

    This comment section is making me depressed. So many unironic calls to end hard-fought for civil rights, so much blatant racism and bigotry. The very existance of these comments proves one thing, that the struggle is not yet over, since there are still people out there that would deny the rights of people based on ideological lies.

    • @Balequalm
      @Balequalm 5 років тому +19

      Lol. Take this advice if you will, don't form an opinion off of UA-cam comments. You don't even know if they are from America.
      In other parts of the world, it's for sooth yet not over.

    • @quartzking3997
      @quartzking3997 5 років тому +12

      PeterIsMyName you will never be able to change the opinion of every single person on these issues. Just give it a rest, equality has been achieved in your country

    • @douglasmacarthur803
      @douglasmacarthur803 5 років тому +5

      Equality is impossible

    • @douglasmacarthur803
      @douglasmacarthur803 5 років тому +2

      Racism is a disase we cant stop

    • @pleasant_asymmetry
      @pleasant_asymmetry 5 років тому +8

      @@douglasmacarthur803 We shouldn't stop trying though

  • @jannestiemes4328
    @jannestiemes4328 5 років тому +72

    Am i the only one who noticed Utah being really progressive all the time and then flipping back to the old ways again.

    • @brandonproductions8401
      @brandonproductions8401 5 років тому +3

      I don’t every recall Utah being Liberal

    • @lithunoisan
      @lithunoisan 5 років тому

      Pfttt Mormons

    • @rellek4053
      @rellek4053 5 років тому +16

      They were always advocates of abolition, (actually one of the reasons their founder died, he was running for President as an abolitionist so some angry racists lynched him.) and ironically they treated their women to more rights than the US would give them for decades despite the polygamy thing.

    • @clickityclak6111
      @clickityclak6111 5 років тому +8

      @@rellek4053 too bad they didn't let black people go the the temple or get the priesthood until 1978 when the government forced them to change their stance.
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1978_Revelation_on_Priesthood
      Journal of Discourses 10:110-111; “Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so.” - Brigham Young, Salt Lake City, March 8, 1863

    • @mrrpmrrpmeow
      @mrrpmrrpmeow 5 років тому

      Women were allowed the right to vote in Utah until a judge from another state made it illegal again

  • @2hameless
    @2hameless 8 місяців тому +12

    To me, this really just shows that progress will always win, and all conservatism is, is a hinderance and slows it down.

    • @vampyra1453
      @vampyra1453 8 місяців тому +10

      well said. throughout history, progress has always won.

    • @SjaeDanmark
      @SjaeDanmark 8 місяців тому +2

      Conservatism is just progressivism moving at snails pace.

    • @Nedits1381
      @Nedits1381 8 місяців тому +2

      Progressiveness has made sense in the past but now it is just morally wrong on so many levels

    • @vampyra1453
      @vampyra1453 8 місяців тому +8

      @@Nedits1381 That's what people thought in 3000BC. And AD 27. And 476. And 768. And 1066. And 1453. And 1613. And 1793. And 1814. And 1917. And 1945. And 1967. And so on. People thought paper was morally wrong, and literacy, and democracy. Why would this time be any different? There's still much progress to be made and much awfulness to eradicate.

    • @2hameless
      @2hameless 8 місяців тому +4

      @@Nedits1381 Yes and thats what they all believed before you, and in 100 years, things today like climate change, reprodcutive rights, and trans rights will be thought of as completely normal.

  • @floptokin
    @floptokin 9 місяців тому +5

    The fact only In 2010s SSM became fully legal is sad tbh

  • @icywafflehero5880
    @icywafflehero5880 5 років тому +112

    This was nice I enjoyed it while eating lunch

    • @argyre3275
      @argyre3275 5 років тому +19

      Very cool

    • @tannerosborn2666
      @tannerosborn2666 5 років тому +22

      how was your lunch

    • @icywafflehero5880
      @icywafflehero5880 5 років тому +27

      TANNER OSBORN I had some homemade chicken tenders with barbecue sauce I’d rate it an 8/10

    • @icywafflehero5880
      @icywafflehero5880 5 років тому +3

      Badr eddin wtf what I enjoyed my lunch while watching a nice videi

    • @Bachars
      @Bachars 5 років тому +2

      I'm watching that as an excuse why not to do homework

  • @Adam__941
    @Adam__941 5 років тому +46

    Your telling me in 2002 being gay was illegal in my state

    • @Adrianadrian173
      @Adrianadrian173 5 років тому +20

      Scott Krafft Exactly. The laws did not punish homosexuality per se, but homosexual acts. They also applied to heterosexual acts. Theoretically, oral and anal sex was illegal regardless of sexuality.

    • @actanonverba3041
      @actanonverba3041 4 роки тому +1

      Titan Striker PVP Build Exotic Mida Scout Rifle those laws banned sodomy, but by that year, it was hardly enforced. only pre-1970s was the persecution more harsh

    • @idrinkpastaforaliving_6269
      @idrinkpastaforaliving_6269 4 роки тому +2

      Oof mine was till 2003

    • @heartbreakingly_8588
      @heartbreakingly_8588 3 роки тому +5

      I will forever hate Texas and can’t wait to I’m able to get out

    • @Shockkings0714
      @Shockkings0714 3 роки тому +4

      @@heartbreakingly_8588 Well, Texas is changing quick and fast.

  • @tyket5929
    @tyket5929 9 місяців тому +5

    Never forget: until “black neighborhoods” and HBCUs aren’t a thing anymore, de facto segregation will always exist.

  • @scottgrey3337
    @scottgrey3337 4 роки тому +20

    Canada: Slavery is bad
    Denmark: Slavery is bad
    Mexico: Slavery is bad
    Half the U.S.: Slavery is bad
    Other half of the U.S.: Y'know, maybe slavery isn't that b-

  • @naitnait00
    @naitnait00 5 років тому +99

    Are you saying Greenland is part of Canada? As a Canadian I approve

    • @TonboIV
      @TonboIV 5 років тому +47

      If there's one thing we don't have enough of in this country, it's godforsaken frozen wilderness with hardly any people in it! We clearly need more of that!

    • @joaofrancisco42
      @joaofrancisco42 5 років тому +27

      Yes, and Canada is part of Serbia.

    • @seannolan9857
      @seannolan9857 5 років тому +15

      Conquer Greenland and Alaska and take your rightful place as largest country on Earth!

    • @turkoositerapsidi
      @turkoositerapsidi 5 років тому +1

      Kalaallit Nunaat is real amerikan nativ peopls land yo idiot englis in Canada vil lose Nunavut to its real home!

    • @Bachars
      @Bachars 5 років тому +2

      @@seannolan9857 AND THEN SLAY THE IMBECILES AND RETAKE JERUSALEM!!!

  • @sarsath7481
    @sarsath7481 5 років тому +52

    Could you go over how early Christians thought of women better than later medieval Christians?

    • @nathanc939
      @nathanc939 5 років тому +16

      The thing is that in reality, even durring the middle age, most men didn't enjoy any more rights than women, on the contrary, especially in nations that had a strong serfdom system. From the fall of Rome to the late renaissance in many part of Europe if you didn't live in a large city and weren't a noble you had no or close to no rights and your lord may even own you, depending of when and where, but most of the time, women unlike men had some laws to protect them a bit.

    • @itchyscientist0576
      @itchyscientist0576 5 років тому

      Drago Arbiter they added it with the goal of pushing gay people into having kids, it does make sense for the time since most people didn’t live past 5, but since the 1840’s and basic medicine it’s just bigotry

  • @Isidoros47
    @Isidoros47 Рік тому +3

    1786: North - slavery is bad, just as the idea of women voting; South - women can vote (for awhile) as far as they´re not Black.

  • @romanticsecret6365
    @romanticsecret6365 2 роки тому +8

    Mexico: first country to decriminalize Homosexuality
    Also Mexico: it’s 2019 and we’re staying with it. Idc that the places above made it legal. I’m sticking with my thing.
    I only want it decriminalized.
    (This is NOT a jab at Mexico or anyone from there. I personally found it humorous how despite it being the first to decriminalize it, it never changed over 200 years.)

    • @molybdenumrose
      @molybdenumrose 2 роки тому +2

      if mexico was given more detail you'd see that it's a patchwork depending on the region

    • @tezbertzero1915
      @tezbertzero1915 8 місяців тому

      I mean, we live in a highly catholic society here on Mexico (u know, Spain), we even had our "guerras cristeras" when government tried to abolish the power of the church in the country, so yeah, kind of makes sense. While government says it's ok it still looks bad by at least 80% of our "boomer" population

  • @timesnewlogan2032
    @timesnewlogan2032 5 років тому +36

    Should have included the abolition of the slave trade; the US actually beat Britain to it, even though slavery itself was still legal. I remember reading somewhere that women voted against women's suffrage in the early years... because they didn't know what the word meant. Honestly, I made the same mistake the first time I heard the word.
    "Of course women's suffrage is bad! Anyone suffering is bad!"

    • @theeagle4463
      @theeagle4463 5 років тому +1

      TimesNewLogan Britain abolished slavery in 1807, we abolished it in 1808, so no the US didn’t abolish it first.

    • @jaxpersson9610
      @jaxpersson9610 4 роки тому +5

      *UK*
      On 25 March 1807, the Abolition of the Slave Trade Act entered the statute books. Nevertheless, although the Act made it illegal to engage in the slave trade throughout the British colonies, trafficking between the Caribbean islands continued, regardless, until 1811.
      *US*
      1808
      Abolition of slavery in the United States
      The slave trade was abolished in the United States from 1 January 1808. However, some slaving continued on an illegal basis for the next fifty years. One popular subterfuge was to use whaling ships.

    • @TheTeodorsoldierabvb
      @TheTeodorsoldierabvb 4 роки тому

      @CheatyTycoon 2 There were laws against slavery throughout history. There was never a law within any society permitting someone to enslave anyone they lay their eyes on :D

  • @theodoreroosevelt3143
    @theodoreroosevelt3143 5 років тому +80

    History of slow and rough way to let people be happy and free

    • @patrickderp1044
      @patrickderp1044 5 років тому +3

      raising taxes is not freedom

    • @hellenicboi14
      @hellenicboi14 5 років тому +34

      Degeneracy is not freedom.

    • @danielogats
      @danielogats 5 років тому +16

      @@hellenicboi14 Go pretend to be a boomer, kid.

    • @hellenicboi14
      @hellenicboi14 5 років тому +28

      3% of the population
      55% of HIV cases
      79% of Syphilis cases
      20% of HPV cases
      70+% of these fine adults will have an STD in their lifetime.

    • @poe_slaw
      @poe_slaw 5 років тому +35

      Hellenic Boi
      “Differences in sexual behavior account for some of these disparities, but others are associated with social and structural inequities, such as the stigma and discrimination that LGBT populations experience.” from that CDC link
      read your own sources, friend

  • @farizkeren5730
    @farizkeren5730 2 роки тому +6

    One of the major reasons that Texas seceded from Mexico and joining the US is because they banned slavery in 1829
    Then the Civil War happened, and slavery is banned in the US too

  • @thehammurabichode7994
    @thehammurabichode7994 9 місяців тому +3

    No one's talking about New Zealand! They were MILES beyond everyone else in terms of a lot of important social ideas relating to equality! They deserve so much more credit.

  • @LillyP-xs5qe
    @LillyP-xs5qe 5 років тому +64

    Wait a second, it was illegal to be gay in the USA in 2002?

    • @EmperorTigerstar
      @EmperorTigerstar  5 років тому +81

      yoni roizman specifically having homosexual sex, yes.

    • @TheHolyMongolEmpire
      @TheHolyMongolEmpire 5 років тому +60

      Yeah but most states wouldn't enforce it anymore by that point. Kinda like how it's still illegal to hold a fish suspiciously in London, illegal but they don't enforce it.

    • @LillyP-xs5qe
      @LillyP-xs5qe 5 років тому +17

      @@EmperorTigerstar would be interesting to see them taking people to court over private act of love making, like try to prove someone having anal when both sides who did it have a good interest to lie about it

    • @twischta
      @twischta 5 років тому +25

      @@TheHolyMongolEmpire Just because it isn't enforced doesn't make the law any better. It could be used by some psychopath as long as it's there.

    • @alejandroojeda1572
      @alejandroojeda1572 5 років тому +1

      @@LillyP-xs5qe not as interesting as you think. It was actually done quite frecuently...in the UK for example.

  • @donaltron2246
    @donaltron2246 5 років тому +37

    You've got most of Mexico wrong, but this is history of Canada and US after all.

  • @Aecrim1
    @Aecrim1 4 роки тому +36

    Mexico: So fellas it's ok to be gay
    ...
    Mexico: women u can't vote and that's all
    me: *confused noises*
    and then i realized there was dictatorship in Mexico xD

    • @cristeromexico3366
      @cristeromexico3366 4 роки тому +4

      It was only decriminalized due to a very liberal republic. But anti-Gay persecution was wide spread. Mexico has had many dictatorships with the longest one being the one of the PRI. It lasted so long that it is referred to as THE Perfect Dictatorship

    • @Joridiy
      @Joridiy 4 роки тому +1

      @@cristeromexico3366
      In the north. In the south being gay was pretty normal.
      ¿Do you remember about the Muxe stuff? Basically transgender people in Oaxaca.

    • @jesusramirezromo2037
      @jesusramirezromo2037 4 роки тому

      @@Joridiy In the center mostly, The north at the time was basiclly empty

  • @isaacrieb7797
    @isaacrieb7797 2 роки тому +38

    All i see is movement towards a free and righteous society. Liberty and justice for all

    • @bye5365
      @bye5365 2 роки тому +8

      Agree. Justice for all!

    • @toaster_rtx1829
      @toaster_rtx1829 2 роки тому +1

      Couldn’t have said it better my friend :)

    • @DylanDude
      @DylanDude 2 роки тому +5

      We’re on the path to true freedom for everyone. Trans rights!

    • @reizayin
      @reizayin 2 роки тому +2

      Is that worth moral degradation though?

    • @DylanDude
      @DylanDude 2 роки тому +7

      @@reizayin "Liberty is moral degradation."