As a common-day (power) user of Windows, I see the same problems/issues/annoyances returning in every Windows version, while these problems/issues/annoyances do never happen in Linux (and in MacOS X). I wonder why that is. Might it have to do with the difference between the Windows and the Linux (and the OS X) kernel, and the way the Windows kernel works? Surely I am not the only one who has more problems/issues/annoyances with Windows than with Linux and/or OSX. Has anyone know more knowledge about this?
At about 32:30 he talk about Linux kernel 2.6 which means this presentation must be done sometime before 2011. Now it does not appear that he knows about the CFQ scheduler which was introduced in Linux back in 2007, so I think your guess seems quite accurate. Both operating systems kernels have hopefully improved since that so an update on this would be interesting.
According to Joanna Rutkowska, he is not correct about Mac OS X. Mac OS X is not a microkernel, it's a monolithic kernel because the BSD subsystem runs in ring0, so it's monolithic.
Wine is only nice when I don't want to waste time booting into windows. I'd rather not work on a virtual system. It's important because while with minimum tweaking a linux distribution can interface with windows the other way around unfortunately isn't true. You boot something like manjaro and you can instantly see samba shares and plug in a FAT32 or NTFS drive. In windows if I can also easily plug in an ext4 formatted drive... That's about it though; I can plug it in. Of course it's made easier if you install software made for viewing these filesystems but honestly if I'm paying for an OS I expect these features to be bundled by default. There are also lots of cases in which virtualisation software won't suffice but I'm sure you can at least google that.
Linux is copying windows because of code and Linux works faster using commands as windows must digest your command an then search Linux just searches no middle man.. but it sucks sorry I despise Linux Ubuntu...
this needs an update, I would love an up to date lecture about this
What happened to the rest of it? It is clearly incomplete.
Where can I see the second part?
Inside Windows 2000 is one of the few technical books I have read cover to cover and love every chapter. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.
any luck with finding rest of this video?
Thanks for the video. Please provide the rest of the video.
That is a great review of the origins of the two operating systems.
Thanks for the video!!
Barely touch the surface. The full (hi)story is much deeper.
I think Posix Threads (PThreads) and cooperative user-mode Portable Threads (PTh) are two completely different things.
As a common-day (power) user of Windows, I see the same problems/issues/annoyances returning in every Windows version, while these problems/issues/annoyances do never happen in Linux (and in MacOS X).
I wonder why that is. Might it have to do with the difference between the Windows and the Linux (and the OS X) kernel, and the way the Windows kernel works?
Surely I am not the only one who has more problems/issues/annoyances with Windows than with Linux and/or OSX.
Has anyone know more knowledge about this?
Great video, so much helpful. Thank you, sir.
Oh no! What happened to the rest of this video?
The speaker is Mark Russinovich, if you find the video do post the link here.
Which year is it? I guess around 2005?
At about 32:30 he talk about Linux kernel 2.6 which means this presentation must be done sometime before 2011. Now it does not appear that he knows about the CFQ scheduler which was introduced in Linux back in 2007, so I think your guess seems quite accurate. Both operating systems kernels have hopefully improved since that so an update on this would be interesting.
how old is this presentation?
Thats why the quality
probably should go look for other ones this one is way out of date
why tho?
According to Joanna Rutkowska, he is not correct about Mac OS X. Mac OS X is not a microkernel, it's a monolithic kernel because the BSD subsystem runs in ring0, so it's monolithic.
unix is a hybrid...a question since dual boot android and linuk must be joining ...lets all make money because android blew up and is still growing!!!
Linux becomming more like windows?
On my dual boot PC Linux takes 7Gb, OS + apps, Windows 7 takes 60Gb + 30 Gb for apps. That says it all.
u work with xda .just interested ?no trolling trust me...can I put android on my 1 gig Linux Ubuntu stick pc?
Today, Windows 10 has a complete Ubuntu distro underneath. Linux does not have the Windows counterpart.
Not quite, it's just running Linux userland on the windows kernel...
This video is about the kernel...
why is this important? does virtualbox not suffice? does wine not suffice?
Wine is only nice when I don't want to waste time booting into windows. I'd rather not work on a virtual system.
It's important because while with minimum tweaking a linux distribution can interface with windows the other way around unfortunately isn't true. You boot something like manjaro and you can instantly see samba shares and plug in a FAT32 or NTFS drive. In windows if I can also easily plug in an ext4 formatted drive... That's about it though; I can plug it in.
Of course it's made easier if you install software made for viewing these filesystems but honestly if I'm paying for an OS I expect these features to be bundled by default. There are also lots of cases in which virtualisation software won't suffice but I'm sure you can at least google that.
Linux is copying windows because of code and Linux works faster using commands as windows must digest your command an then search Linux just searches no middle man.. but it sucks sorry I despise Linux Ubuntu...
On my dual boot PC Linux takes 7Gb, OS + apps, Windows 7 takes 60Gb + 30 Gb for apps. That says it all.