Who Hated Clint Eastwood?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 тра 2024
- Clint Eastwood, hit the screen in the 1960s, an modern alternative to John Wayne as one of the western genres biggest stars. Having started in the TV series Rawhide then elevated into a global star through Sergio Leone’s now legendary Dollars Trilogy, consolidating his status by playing the anti-hero cop Harry Callahan in the Dirty Harry franchise.
Over six decades, Eastwood became a leading producer and director, taking home four Academy Awards and four Golden Globes for his work behind the camera. Remarkably, still active today.
Clearly much loved and admired by millions. You don't get to be this big without having some that dislike or even hate you. Today we will take a look at some of his haters.
My Channel - ua-cam.com/channels/rtQ.html... Facebook Page - / famous-people-10080870...
email - 0famous0people0@gmail.com - Розваги
Typical of Lee to judge a film by how many blacks are in it.
Well he rode into Lago and the people of the town begged him to protect them from three desperados that were planning their revenge on them once they were released from prison. They hated the stranger with the exception of a little man called Mordecai. They hated him but offered him anything he wanted to help save them. The stranger stayed to help save the two faced miserable cowards from the fate that was coming their way. Hahaha
Personally, I don't care who hated Clint Eastwood, he'll always be a favorite western hero of mine.
You can't go thru you life and have every one like you unless you do nothing.
But then your parents will hate you :)
Then they will hate you for doing nothing:)
aside from necessary drama, very interesting, everbody can't like everyone, in 1964 he blasted all of the stale overworked cliche's right out and made westerns exciting and intersting again, good actor great director, amazing career..........................................
Cant make an omlete without breaking some eggs
Actually, Hanks said his comments in jest on Graham Norton.
I think a couple of these comments were not entirely serious. Hanks was prone to jest!
1. Spike Lee. Of the more than 70,000 US soldiers in the invasion of Iwo Jima, about 1% were black (estimates were 700-900). I wonder how many Spike would have been satisfied seeing in Clint's production?
2. Wayne's attitude reflected a changing of the guard from the 'civility/honor' of the golden age of cinema to the more gritty, 'in your face' pictures of the 60s and 70s. He saw Clint representing this change and was of course unhappy about it.
3. Regarding Clint's style (one take and move on), many actors shower accolades on this style of directing (Morgan Freeman, Tommy Lee Jones, Robert Mitchum). Clint admits he tries to force his actors into more a theatrical style performance (you don't get to reshoot a live theatre performance!), and he also admits it's not for everyone. Since his style is so well known, it's rather hypocritical for an actor to sign on to an Eastwood picture and then complain about his style of directing....
Yeah John Wayne particularly did not like 'The Man With No Name' spaghetti westerns. You gotta wonder if he was truly overwhelmed with the success and rising popularity of the three productions and let some jealousy get the best of him.
If I remember also, it was rumored that Wayne was no fan of the western 'High Noon' which was released in 1952, early in the golden years of western movie making, more than a decade before the release of 'Fistful Of Dollars'. If true, I'm guessing he realized the success and rising popularity of the masterpiece 'High Noon' and maybe felt a touch of jealousy there also. Oh he may have given some other personal reasons, but my guess is he knew he was the top western actor and he did not want any competition that would threaten his box office success. Only IMO.
@@TS-wh4ey I don't think he was jealous. He was a man of a different age -- he had actual VALUES and he stood by them (whether we agree with his take on what those values should be is up to us). Hard for us in this day and age of relativism to understand, I know....
@@bravehome4276
Maybe, maybe not. Hard to understand why an actor of his stature would be offended by other actors and movies of the same genre. What would offend him in the movie 'High Noon'. Just an old school western with an amazing cast and storyline of a sheriff facing incredible odds with no where to turn. This western was magnificent and it's always placed at or near the top of anyone's favorite western movie list.
The three Eastwood spaghetti westerns helped energize the western movie genre and certainly created a new western movie icon that filled the gaps and kept the genre alive for another decade or so to come. And these three also are at or near the top of anyone's favorite movie list.
I personally see nothing among the four movies that would have been any different as far as any content that was present in Wayne's westerns. Heroes, villains, shootouts, etc., just flat out western movie action all the same.
You would think Wayne would have had praise for the success of them films, but how they offended his values are way beyond me.
Yeah, spikes comment was not that serious I think. In Wayne's day. It was a different time. It's not fair to judge too harshly by todays standards. Clint was a student of film making, learned from those directed him. He found his own style that worked for him. Some actors are used to being directed with kid gloves. Again a different time to now. Studios loved him as he brought films in on time and budget.
@@TS-wh4ey We would need to walk a mile in Wayne's moccasins....
Please remove the "hate" hook from your post.
John Wayne did not like Eastwood's portrayal of the wild west. Wayne sure did not mind killing a lot of "them that injuns" and the way that were portrayed in many of his westerns.
A different time.
Lee Moore, and Wayne,..... Write these guys off. The others are just nitpicking.