Partial Fractions - Repeated Linear Factors : ExamSolutions Maths Revision

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 гру 2014
  • Revising partial fractions with repeated linear factors.
    Go to www.examsolutions.net/ for the index, playlists and more maths videos on partial fractions and other maths topics.
    THE BEST THANK YOU: www.examsolutions.net/donation/

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22

  • @EpicEditsBySaz
    @EpicEditsBySaz 9 років тому +22

    cheers. I think i'm going to use the 'any value' method than the 'comparing coefficients' method, just because i feel like there's less chance of me making a silly mistake.

  • @zohanaseer454
    @zohanaseer454 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you so much ❤️❤️❤️ it’s so helpful

  • @abbasmoosvi9508
    @abbasmoosvi9508 9 років тому +1

    Thanks a million!

  • @vijithsoman
    @vijithsoman 9 років тому

    Thank you!

  • @user-mw5rl4jz4e
    @user-mw5rl4jz4e 8 місяців тому

    Thanks very much it has help me a lot

  • @sambernstein2952
    @sambernstein2952 2 роки тому

    Thank you

  • @konradw360
    @konradw360 2 роки тому +1

    Very nice

  • @jeremypillai496
    @jeremypillai496 5 років тому

    legend

  • @misan2002
    @misan2002 4 роки тому +2

    0:52 how does that make sense? I dont get why youd write out the factors out again but 1 with squared and the other without squared
    Please please im stuck on that. That the only issue i am having, nobody explains it so please could you help me?

    • @ExamSolutions_Maths
      @ExamSolutions_Maths  4 роки тому +8

      Look at it another way, it may help. Suppose you had to do A/3 + B/9 + C/2 then the lowest common denominator would be 18. Now if I had something over / (3)² (2) then as you can see it came from A/3 + B/3² +C/2 not B/3²+C/2. We must include the factors of 3² in this case 3, in case it was part of the original sum. A may well turn out to be 0 but let the maths show that.

    • @misan2002
      @misan2002 4 роки тому +4

      @@ExamSolutions_Maths ohh, thanks for taking your time to explain that, it really helped me

    • @ExamSolutions_Maths
      @ExamSolutions_Maths  4 роки тому +2

      @@misan2002 You're welcome.

    • @misan2002
      @misan2002 4 роки тому +1

      @@ExamSolutions_Maths just one more question, why would 3 be one of the factors?

    • @angelstarfire
      @angelstarfire 4 роки тому +3

      @@ExamSolutions_Maths thank you for the explanation!!(^_^ )

  • @0484libin
    @0484libin 9 років тому +1

    gooddddddddddddddddd

  • @mwilachilombo6306
    @mwilachilombo6306 2 роки тому +2

    I subscribe

    • @ExamSolutions_Maths
      @ExamSolutions_Maths  Рік тому

      Welcome to the channel Mwila! I'm sure you will find the videos really helpful

  • @bobbyclarke591
    @bobbyclarke591 4 роки тому

    Note to self: 6:35

  • @alandkadr646
    @alandkadr646 4 роки тому +3

    mashallah

  • @mariangraceballadares1777
    @mariangraceballadares1777 Рік тому

    why is your B= 2/3 becomes 4/3 in finding the A?

    • @xan588
      @xan588 10 місяців тому

      might be very late but we derived 2B from the substitution of x=0 and since we already found that B= 2/3, 2/3 x 2 = 4/3