The Tragic Death of Tom Hagen | The Godfather Explained

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 вер 2022
  • How did Tom Hagen die in The Godfather? Are we ever told how the consigliere to Don Corleone died, and why Robert Duvall was not in The Godfather Part III?
    BUY ME A COFFEE: www.buymeacoffee.com/cinerant...
    BECOME A MEMBER: / @cineranter
    SUPPORT THE CHANNEL ON PATREON: www.patreon.com/user?u=8580945
    FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER: / cineranter
    FOLLOW ME ON INSTAGRAM: / cineranter1
    FOLLOW ME ON TIKTOK: / cineranter
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 928

  • @philmann3476
    @philmann3476 Рік тому +237

    "They made him an offer he could refuse...and he did." Hilarious -- well done.

    • @one51media35
      @one51media35 12 днів тому

      Duval asked for a $ 1 Million dollars and they offered him less.

  • @LqdSanity79
    @LqdSanity79 Рік тому +1074

    Duvall stated in an interview that he really wanted to do the third film but they money they were offering him was disrespectful. He was a main character in the first two movies and, with Vito, Sonny, and Fredo dead, would have been the second lead in part three behind Pacino. He thought he should at least get paid half of what Pacino was making but they refused. Diane Keaton was paid twice what they offered Duvall. He rightfully saw it as an insult, considering he was an A-list actor in his own right. The studio said they didn't need him and the movie would be great without him, so he declined. I'm not sure what role Coppola played in the negotiations, but without Tom Hagen the movie became the worst in the trilogy, by far. I've seen part one and two over a dozen times, but I've only watch part three once and probably will never watch it again. It's just not good, and Pacino's acting is way too over the top. They really dropped the ball on that one.

    • @sickheadache9903
      @sickheadache9903 Рік тому +43

      Yep! That was it%! Money!

    • @angelahoskavich3215
      @angelahoskavich3215 Рік тому +23

      I agree

    • @hanynada6752
      @hanynada6752 Рік тому +34

      Can't agree more 👍👍👍

    • @adrianotero7963
      @adrianotero7963 Рік тому +78

      I would agree with that....the Godfather is not the same without Duvall......something is missing.

    • @dllockard7324
      @dllockard7324 Рік тому +41

      Well said. Hard to watch GF III, and so I turned off early.

  • @mrkeiths48
    @mrkeiths48 Рік тому +231

    Tom Hagen was a major figure in the Godfather story. It's unfortunate that he was excluded over compensation to make the movie.

    • @lorimcevoy9419
      @lorimcevoy9419 Рік тому +7

      He wasn't excluded. He said no because they offered him to little. So they just wrote him out.

  • @IvanLendl87
    @IvanLendl87 Рік тому +949

    The absence of Tom Hagen in Godfather 3 pretty much sealed the fate of the film to mediocrity. In Godfather 1 & 2 it was Tom who was the voice of reason and showed a large measure of civility compared to the rest of the Corleone family. With Michael trying to get away from the organized crime life, the character of Tom Hagen would’ve been crucial in that regard. And Duvall is a great actor who would’ve upped the acting quotient.

    • @treystephens6166
      @treystephens6166 Рік тому +18

      Some day this war is going to end …

    • @MrTCHOSS
      @MrTCHOSS Рік тому +52

      Agree 100%. Behind Michael, the most important character was Tom. The family attorney, then the consigliere, later the acting-boss. The studio (including director FFC) really screwed that up. Duvall was so severely missed, he proved the studio should have forked over the money. In the end... it came out to a few million dollars to get Duvall in a movie that has grossed $20 million its first weekend and made $160 million globally.

    • @blanchewarren4888
      @blanchewarren4888 Рік тому +73

      Today he would of been replaced by a black actor

    • @pauliewalnuts2007
      @pauliewalnuts2007 Рік тому +16

      @@blanchewarren4888 😂😂😂

    • @rd9793
      @rd9793 Рік тому +14

      @@MrTCHOSS
      You mean Big Mike?

  • @lanicoya415
    @lanicoya415 Рік тому +444

    I would have loved to see Robert Duval in the Godfather part 3. He was definitely missed

    • @treystephens6166
      @treystephens6166 Рік тому

      He should have just done it.

    • @tr7198
      @tr7198 Рік тому +4

      The movie itself was very controversial in subject matter at the time.

    • @imjinrat2325
      @imjinrat2325 Рік тому +2

      He probably would have helped a little, but he wasn't missed as much as Clemenza was in II.

    • @guaddv
      @guaddv Рік тому +2

      Duvall couldn't be talked back because they couldn't agree on his salary.

    • @tlist1970
      @tlist1970 Рік тому +1

      @Jesus is Muslim 3X what they offered Pacino. He said 2X would have been ok, but that was an insult and I didn’t blame him.

  • @marksheppard6498
    @marksheppard6498 8 місяців тому +40

    Duvalls character added the richness to the series and it was sorely missing in the third installment.

    • @RuthEsther-nn6qe
      @RuthEsther-nn6qe 9 днів тому

      Part 3 was weird 2 me. I don't know why cousins were dating. Joey Zaza was too loud to be mafia. The.priests and nuns reminded me of Catholic school. Part 3 can be ignored 😢

  • @ConnorHolbrook419
    @ConnorHolbrook419 Рік тому +62

    Tom was honestly probably my favorite character, he’s just so dedicated, educated and unwavering in his dignity and loyalty. Also I believe it’s widely agreed Part 3 was good but it’s not in the same league as 1 and 2. Just different levels of film quality

    • @My20GUNS
      @My20GUNS 5 місяців тому +5

      Nah, part 3 is legitimately bad. If it wasn't Godfather, it'd be an average/mediocre mafia movie. But it is, and it's all the more pathetic & embarrassing

    • @serenityinside1
      @serenityinside1 Місяць тому

      @@My20GUNS correct. poster above an idiot !!

  • @Palanibert
    @Palanibert Рік тому +38

    Tom's most important counsel in GF3 would have been to tell Michael to get a better haircut.

  • @luisbielich8145
    @luisbielich8145 11 місяців тому +68

    to replace robert duvall with george hamilton is like cinderella's fairy godmother replacing the two mice and the pumpkin with a couple of roaches and a zucchini...

    • @carlaphoenix8965
      @carlaphoenix8965 4 місяці тому +5

      Very well put. You nailed it.

    • @awillis244
      @awillis244 3 місяці тому +5

      Yeah, he didn’t fit, nor did even his name.

    • @jamesdrynan
      @jamesdrynan 3 місяці тому +3

      I think Hamilton did an adequate job with the part as it was written, but it was a cardboard character.

    • @davidpeters5117
      @davidpeters5117 3 місяці тому +1

      As much as I like them, George Hamilton, Eli Wallach and Joe Mantegna were out of place in GF III. Robert Duval and his character Tom Hagen were sorely needed and missed. This project was more akin to a three part made for tv movie than a major studio release.

    • @craignewnes5148
      @craignewnes5148 2 місяці тому

      Too funny! I just basically wrote the same comments.
      HA!

  • @NoirL.A.
    @NoirL.A. Рік тому +126

    both TOM HAGEN and PETER CLEMENZA were lost to the series over money. there were other issues too but it was mostly money which i think is pretty sad.

    • @robhaskins
      @robhaskins Рік тому +24

      It's really too bad that the powers that be, knowing how great The Godfather was, imagined they could get by without Clemenza in part 2; then they repeated the same mistake with Hagen in part 3. Very foolish production decisions.

    • @NoirL.A.
      @NoirL.A. Рік тому +7

      @@robhaskins agreed.

    • @scottjohnson3017
      @scottjohnson3017 Рік тому +14

      @@robhaskins Godfather II stands on it's own, however, I think they did an excellent job in filling that void by showing young Pete Clemenza and the key role he played in the founding of the Corleone family. Tom Hagen not being in Godfather III was bad enough, however I'm not sure him being in it could've saved the film as a whole.

    • @georgesouthwick7000
      @georgesouthwick7000 Рік тому +7

      The Clemenza character (Richard Castilano) not only wanted a huge amount of money, but he also insisted on his girlfriend getting a part as well.

    • @robhaskins
      @robhaskins Рік тому +3

      @@georgesouthwick7000 I'd say he deserved both-he was THAT good.

  • @razorsharp8549
    @razorsharp8549 Рік тому +43

    Tom Hagen always was faithful to Michael and the family. He was the voice of reason for the best interests of the family.

  • @charlie-obrien
    @charlie-obrien Рік тому +35

    When the studio decided to low-ball Duvall for the reprise of his role as Tom Hagen, they where probably thinking that Andy Garcia would carry the second male lead part in the film.
    Boy were they wrong. That, plus Coppola's daughter in the second female lead killed Godfather III and it probably shouldn't even be considered as a sequel to Godfather I & II.
    It downright sucks.

    • @jephrokimbo9050
      @jephrokimbo9050 Рік тому

      agree with BOTH points you made

    • @dc6461
      @dc6461 Рік тому +1

      Michael at the end of gf2 is Michael from gf3 only older.
      Sofia was a mistake but she wasn't first,second or even third choice

    • @RuthEsther-nn6qe
      @RuthEsther-nn6qe День тому

      Joey Zaza was the star of this messy movie. It was a cartoon version of the Godfather 1 and 2.😊

  • @RidgeRunner10
    @RidgeRunner10 Рік тому +93

    I believe Duvall said in an interview after III was released that they tried to get him on the cheap since Pacino wanted such a huge paycheck and he refused. Reminded Coppola that he was in a fact a 2x Oscar winner and his Tom Hagen character was central to the story - but they wouldn't budge

    • @jaybell1390
      @jaybell1390 Рік тому +1

      @CTL 123. They Didn't go Against the Family. 😅😅

    • @bobbysimmons2755
      @bobbysimmons2755 8 місяців тому +1

      Only won one oscar

    • @awillis244
      @awillis244 3 місяці тому

      Awful misstake

    • @awillis244
      @awillis244 3 місяці тому

      Mistake mistake mistake.

    • @djtoona
      @djtoona 2 місяці тому

      @@bobbysimmons2755 He beat castmates Al Pacino and James Caan for that Oscar

  • @RedSiegfried
    @RedSiegfried Рік тому +151

    The Godfather and The Godfather Part II were great movies. It's a shame they never made a third one.

    • @bogusmogus9551
      @bogusmogus9551 Рік тому +11

      Lol!

    • @rahulgyawali
      @rahulgyawali Рік тому +4

      Search 'Godfather III'

    • @Pottasium92
      @Pottasium92 Рік тому +3

      @@rahulgyawali It doesn't show anything canon, only fan stories and fan films.

    • @joharimamat2154
      @joharimamat2154 Рік тому +12

      ​@@rahulgyawali
      Did not catch the drift?

    • @documentthedrama8279
      @documentthedrama8279 Рік тому +9

      almost as sad as metallica never making a fifth album after making 4 classics

  • @SombraPiloto
    @SombraPiloto Рік тому +22

    I thought I was losing my mind when i saw the title of the video because I've seen Godfather I and II more times than I can possibly count and don't remember Tom dying in either of them. Turns out I simply forgot that Godfather III even exists. I'm not sure I ever knew it existed at all.

    • @TheScourge-sg5vv
      @TheScourge-sg5vv Місяць тому

      Well your lucky.
      Dont waste your time watching it

  • @hansenfiet2539
    @hansenfiet2539 Рік тому +76

    Could you imagine the first two films without Tom Hagen in them? Yeah, me either! That’s why the third felt like it was missing something throughout the entire movie!

    • @Thespeedrap
      @Thespeedrap Рік тому +6

      The third one was a waste of time and resource that migh had damage Coppola's career after that.

    • @bogusmogus9551
      @bogusmogus9551 Рік тому +2

      Didn't help that Goodfellas was released at the same time. Made G3 look as dull as ditchwater

    • @Thespeedrap
      @Thespeedrap Рік тому +4

      @@bogusmogus9551 Of Course Godfather 3 was the weakest and I think he tried to compete with Scorsese too much during that time.

    • @urosmarjanovic663
      @urosmarjanovic663 Рік тому +5

      @@bogusmogus9551 Inbreeding romance also didn't help.

    • @maxt707
      @maxt707 4 місяці тому

      Actually, the character Sonny was described as dark-haired, big muscular, and not the scrawny chest we see.

  • @PaulGreen11
    @PaulGreen11 Рік тому +17

    Best Tom Hagan Scene...
    "Don't worry about anything
    Frankie Five Angels."

  • @zafarsobhan9191
    @zafarsobhan9191 Рік тому +12

    The Achilles heel of Godfather 2 was that they wrote out Clemenza and created the character of Frank Pentangeli. The story would have been 10 times better as originally written. The fact that Frank Pentangeli was created for the movie and therefore didn't have any real back story robbed his betrayal arc of any real dramatic substance and was the movie's fatal flaw. That too was a contract dispute! SMH

  • @jbmorgan
    @jbmorgan Рік тому +28

    I didn't think Michael would have had Tom killed, since as you say he would have confessed it in the Vatican scene, but I always assumed the two would have been estranged after Fredo's death, since Tom was surely aware of what had really happened, and he also clearly wasn't on board with what Michael was doing towards the end of Part II, so it would make sense.

    • @paullinford4510
      @paullinford4510 Рік тому +9

      Yes and the entire narrative arc of Godfather 2 points towards that - by the end, Michael has slaughtered all his enemies but also alienated himself from his wife, his children and his closest friends, including Tom, hence the closing shots of him sitting alone contemplating his pyrrhic victory.

  • @emkkahn
    @emkkahn Рік тому +99

    Tom Hagen was arguably the BEST character the first two films. The lack of him in part 3 to counter Mike's growing crazy would have made that movie so much better.
    Also, Robert Duvall is a fantastic actor. The first thing I saw him in was an episode of the Twilight Zone, "The Miniature" and it's still one of my fav episodes.
    Great video, thanks!

  • @rsr789
    @rsr789 Рік тому +17

    Interesting thing about Luca Brasi: he was played by Lenny Montana, a real life 'enforcer' for Colombo crime family.

  • @PeterCombs
    @PeterCombs Рік тому +17

    I like Duval in every movie he's ever made..."Falling Down" was one of his best.

    • @oldmansbasement
      @oldmansbasement 4 місяці тому

      Check out his movie “Get Low”

    • @AJdet-2
      @AJdet-2 3 місяці тому

      I had lost my job, my wife and daughter when falling down came out 😮 .
      ( They made that movie for me so I wouldn't go off the deep end 😊 )

    • @PlasmaCoolantLeak
      @PlasmaCoolantLeak 2 місяці тому

      He was also in two episodes of the original "Outer Limits." He's one of my favorite actors.

    • @JT-ju7kf
      @JT-ju7kf 2 місяці тому

      I agree. 🎉

  • @createdsoicancomment2833
    @createdsoicancomment2833 Рік тому +21

    Missing Tom and small other details are the reason why Godfather 3 did not feel like the other movies in the saga.

  • @jack_k2136
    @jack_k2136 Рік тому +69

    Tom Hagen was always pragmatic. Imagining him, resigned to his fate, in the car, and choosing to reflect on happy memories, sounds exactly like Tom Hagen.

  • @Jazbo777
    @Jazbo777 Рік тому +16

    I did miss Tom in the third movie. I thought he would have taken over for micheal when Michael died but since micheal died old I would have loved for these two men to be together as brothers till the end.

    • @Aven-Sharma1991
      @Aven-Sharma1991 Рік тому

      He couldn’t take over because he wasn’t Sicilian, he was only temporary, but the leadership would’ve gone to a sicilian
      The other families were already breaking their balls by referring to them as an Irish gang but they wouldn’t have tolerated Hagen as boss, they wouldn’t have respected him because he wasn’t sicilian

  • @radar0412
    @radar0412 Рік тому +9

    When Duvall asked for more money to be in Godfather III, the director was overheard saying "You're out Tom."

  • @josecarreon1828
    @josecarreon1828 11 місяців тому +12

    I bet now they regret not paying Duvall what he asked for

  • @robertalford2257
    @robertalford2257 Рік тому +42

    When I first saw part 3, I remember thinking how hollow it was regarding Tom Hagen. Just a short line that he was dead did not give justice to a brilliant part played by a brilliant actor. But didn't the same thing happen with Clemenza in part 2?

    • @albundy6008
      @albundy6008 Рік тому

      The actor who played Clemenza wanted a lot more money and control over the script for his character so his part was rewritten for Frank Pantangelli.

  • @julioaranton5223
    @julioaranton5223 Рік тому +10

    His character's absence in my opinion dealt a death blow to a Masterpiece's continiuarion.

  • @adobeblues
    @adobeblues Рік тому +6

    Simply put, Duvall had won Best Actor Oscar already for "Tender Mercies" after three previous nominations. Pacino had not. He had several more years to wait until "Scent of a Woman". Duvall felt that the Oscar made him deserving of at least half the $5 million Pacino was getting.

  • @perceivedvelocity9914
    @perceivedvelocity9914 Рік тому +6

    Your comment about 'the studio making him a offer that he could refuse' made me laugh. Thank you for the content.

  • @jonathanbrhane4734
    @jonathanbrhane4734 7 місяців тому +5

    Tom perspective of Micheal vs Vito dichotomy was unique & near perfect. He worked with Vito closely & got to see his great mess up close up more than any of the other children. That’s why you can see him in Part 1 get pulled into Micheal & seeing his potential when he’s talking about the dire need of taking out Sollozzo and using their paper in the News Papers to spin it. He also see Micheal going down a dark path towards the end of Part 2. Tom knew as ruthless as Vito was prepared to be, he would never lose his sense of humanity like Micheal was. Tom was definitely missed in Part 3. He might’ve not been the best war time Consigliori but definitely a loving devoted Son/Brother & extremely valuable confidant/legal consultant.

  • @harryleimgruber1202
    @harryleimgruber1202 7 місяців тому +4

    Tom Hagen was undoubteless a major figure in Part 1 and 2 of the Godfather. He's part of the family and loyal to the tooth. What a shame the producer didn't want to pay him what he deserved...!!!

  • @HaHa56767
    @HaHa56767 Рік тому +9

    Robert Duvall not being in the Godfather, part 3 as Tom Hagen was the second biggest mistake next to the ridiculously boring Vatican angle they decided to go with.
    Godfather 3 should have been a prequel telling the story of the ride of Don Vito and the five families with an older Michael making a minor appearance to bring his and Tom’s arc full circle.
    I always believed that Tom died of a heart attack at the begging of part 3.

  • @tlist1970
    @tlist1970 Рік тому +8

    It's too bad that Duvall couldn't work something out with Coppola. That's the biggest reason why it's not on par with the first 2. Duvall seems to always complete the cast and put films on a different level.

  • @jillianmicheleg.4084
    @jillianmicheleg.4084 Рік тому +6

    I’m glad they didn’t go with Michael and Tom going to war with eachother. But you can’t really ignore the disrespect toward Tom with them “killing him off” just like that. Sucks because he was an important character.

  • @royfr8136
    @royfr8136 Рік тому +11

    Part 3 - (mentioned in the comments) The fact that Coppola is still denying that he purposely put his daughter in the movie because he couldn't find another actress - no other actress other than his inexperienced daughter - so no other actress in Hollywood was available to start in a Godfather film with Coppola. - Tells me that he is in complete denial that part 3 is absolutely terrible. And it is. Not just a bad Godfather movie but a bad movie. The character of Michael is terrible. It ruins the trilogy. For me The Godfather ended at the end of part 2. It's as bad as his hair cut for that film.

    • @AvengerII
      @AvengerII 4 місяці тому

      Winona Ryder was originally cast as the daughter of Michael Corleone but she dropped out of Godfather Part III to make another movie. Other actresses like Julia Roberts were considered but nobody wanted to do GdF III.

    • @royfr8136
      @royfr8136 4 місяці тому +1

      @@AvengerII No actress in the whole of the world wanted to work with Coppola? No one.... OK. Fine I guess the ONLY choice was his own daughter with next to zero acting experience....

  • @emilytrott
    @emilytrott Рік тому +10

    You mention if Michael had killed Tom, or ordered someone to kill him, he would have mentioned it in GF3 when confessing to the bishop. Michael said that he had killed his own brother, and we assumed he was referring to Fredo, but Tom was also his brother and someone who he had trusted implicitly.

    • @loydingle7088
      @loydingle7088 Рік тому +4

      He was talking any Fredo, why would he not, it was on his conscience, when he had the diabetic attack in the kitchen ,he called out his name

    • @Chilliam13
      @Chilliam13 Рік тому +7

      Michael also said "I killed my mother's son." Tom was adopted.

    • @emilytrott
      @emilytrott Рік тому +2

      @@Chilliam13 Excellent point. I hadn't remembered the words he used, and those would definitely leave Tom out. Thank you for posting it. :)

  • @B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont
    @B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont Рік тому +23

    Going on the timeline between "The Godfather's Revenge" and "Part 3", there would have been some fifteen years between Tom Hagen's death and the events around Pope Paul VI's passing. It would make sense on a lot of levels (particularly with Michael's personality quirks) for Tom's absence to be barely addressed. It must have been a business thing that Paramount didn't consider "Revenge" to be canon as I thought it fit very well into the overall story line and had no conflicts with any of the films. Part 3 is often panned as mediocre, but I thought it well enough done to complete the story. Michael's death at the end could have happened at any time between 1978 and, say, 1995 (although that late date may have been unlikely given his diabetic problems). I read or heard one time that a Part 4 was kicked around but Mario Puzo passed, and the project died along with him. Summing up, Tom Hagen's death in a Florida swamp would make a lot of sense for a mob lawyer. And yes, Part 3 would have been better with Robert Duvall.

    • @68majortom
      @68majortom Рік тому +2

      Was it not Michaels Daughter who Died?

    • @B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont
      @B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont Рік тому +6

      @@68majortom Yes, she died after being shot outside the opera house. But the very end of Part 3, at least on the DVD I have, shows an aging Michael sitting in a lawn chair outside the Italian villa and remembering happy times. He looks vainly around, perhaps mostly blind from his diabetes, and he struggles with his glasses. In short order a long shot show his arms fall limp to side, he slumps over, and he ends up a lifeless body on the ground beside his chair. A pet dog looked sadly on. Thus ended his tortured, complicated life.

  • @amalHope3
    @amalHope3 3 місяці тому +3

    I always loved Tom Hagan's character and I think his role in the Corleone family was vital

  • @kijekuyo9494
    @kijekuyo9494 Рік тому +12

    I was only interested in seeing Godfather 3 to see what would happen with the Hagen character. In the first two I saw him as a survivor, and I think it would have been best if he went on living through the series.

  • @JeffSmith-pl2pj
    @JeffSmith-pl2pj Рік тому +8

    They needed Hagen for Godfather III. They should have paid Devall and cut Keaton. She wouldn't have been missed. Hagan would never have challenged Michael. He wouldn't have wanted to be a full time Don. He never personally killed anyone. Neither did Sonny, as far as I know, but definitely a plus if you want to be a Don.

  • @FZ-sv4tm
    @FZ-sv4tm Рік тому +13

    Tom was the best. Hands down

  • @Rohirok
    @Rohirok Рік тому +3

    This is all very interesting, but there is a major flaw in your analysis: there were only 2 Godfather films.

  • @ciaranmcguinness8900
    @ciaranmcguinness8900 Рік тому +8

    what killed Tom Hagen? Robert Duvall having standards and rightly calling out that the only reason to make a Godfather 3 was money

  • @jimjack3447
    @jimjack3447 Рік тому

    Very interesting indeed. Thank you

  • @vittorioabr
    @vittorioabr Рік тому +38

    I think Tom was more cerebral than violent - obvious - as opposed to Michael who was cerebral AND violent. I think Tom was more inclined to do business - it's business, not personal - and to do cool power calculations. He would've very likely ended in a deep-background position of political power, like managing political campaigns in Vegas or LittleRock, Arkansas.

    • @brianjones7660
      @brianjones7660 Рік тому

      Little Rock AR....
      I saw what you did...😎

  • @matthewalexanderlemma8000
    @matthewalexanderlemma8000 Рік тому +35

    The third film really does miss Tom Hagen. Had Tom been in the film, an ending where Michael kills him or vice versa could’ve been really surprising.

    • @Better_Call_Raul
      @Better_Call_Raul Рік тому +7

      Don't see any circumstance where Tom Hagen would kill Michael or anyone else for that matter.
      Tom never orders a killing. He simply looks the other way when killings happen. Do not see Michael ever ordering Tom to be killed either. Tom always kissed Michael's ass.

    • @Thespeedrap
      @Thespeedrap Рік тому +6

      3 was just terrible and shouldn't have been made point blank.

    • @h4rder10
      @h4rder10 9 місяців тому +1

      tom is not the sort to kill michael. u cant just put something out there just because audience dont expect it.

  • @GazAce
    @GazAce Рік тому +12

    The studio should've met Duvall half way at least. The Godfather Pt 3 was a let down after the first two but if Duvall played Tom again, I think it would've been saved 🤔

    • @stevekru6518
      @stevekru6518 Рік тому

      I too would’ve enjoyed more Duvall, but unless you’re an agent with CAA or something similar, it’s risible for you to to tell Paramount and Coppola how to spend their money. Upping Duvall’s take could set off a chain reaction with demands so high the movie wouldn’t have been made.
      Apologies if I’ve offended you, but will make it up to you by suggesting you watch the series The Offer, which is the behind the scenes story of making Godfather

    • @GazAce
      @GazAce Рік тому

      @@stevekru6518 No apologies man, all good. Thanks for your reply 🙏👌

  • @josephhickman4759
    @josephhickman4759 Рік тому +1

    Robert Duvall went on to put on astonishing performances "the great santini" and "apocalypse now" which even though different scenes had Brando on set... would have loved to be a fly on the wall during meetings behind the camera.

  • @MREScout
    @MREScout Рік тому +10

    Admittedly it's been a long time since I read The Godfather Returns and The Godfather's Revenge, but I swear I remember Tom "making his bones" by killing someone at the end. Whoever the other boss was says something along the lines of "Irishman, you think they're going to let you make your bones by killing me?" and Tom, cold as ice does the deed. I don't remember the drowning in the swamp thing at all.

    • @peterbellini6102
      @peterbellini6102 Рік тому +1

      You are 110% correct. I absolutely remember that. Tom kills a mob boss (almost a "wannabee") and Geraci waits in a self-designed bunker until it's safe to come out. I felt that Michael respected Fausto after that and allowed him to live.

    • @tr7198
      @tr7198 Рік тому

      Wasnt that the film producer with the horse in his bed that said that to him.

    • @shivasirons6159
      @shivasirons6159 Рік тому

      Mre scout, i remember the drowning thing but it was so long ago i dont remember the particulars, they were in a rowboat on a lake i think.

    • @tr7198
      @tr7198 Рік тому +1

      @@shivasirons6159
      That was fishing El Fredo the hail Mary episode..

    • @shivasirons6159
      @shivasirons6159 Рік тому

      TR, no this was some sequel thing, they had fredo as secretly gay and he tries some buying cemetarys scheme.

  • @stevesandwichproductions1043
    @stevesandwichproductions1043 Рік тому +12

    Would I have wanted to see Tom in The Godfather Part III? Let me put it this way - I wish I had never seen The Godfather Part III.

  • @anthonyc1629
    @anthonyc1629 Рік тому +3

    "Your attorney Tom Hagen, whatever happened there."

  • @ApoorwVikramDwivedi
    @ApoorwVikramDwivedi Місяць тому +2

    If a filmmaker is serious about story then omitting a significant character over an actor declining an under par compensation is outright obnoxious. It shows in the Godfather-3. Like someone said earlier, I too have watched the first two parts a couple of dozen times over but have watched part 3 just twice and I'm not gonna ever watch it again.

  • @jasonchen9645
    @jasonchen9645 Рік тому +30

    The three best Scenes for me with Tom Hagen is:
    1) Telling Vito news of sonny's death in Part one
    2) Blackmailing the senator in vegas after they killed a prostitute and set him up with it, and 3) The scenes when he questions if michael has gone too far.

    • @richardmoores
      @richardmoores Рік тому +1

      If you’re going to edit your post anyway, at least edit his name to spell it right.

    • @gomriria2197
      @gomriria2197 Рік тому

      3? Which one?

    • @brandos83
      @brandos83 Рік тому

      4) telling charlie sheen he loves the smell of naples in the morning

    • @shivasirons6159
      @shivasirons6159 Рік тому +1

      Smells like victory.!

    • @lesterpaul9657
      @lesterpaul9657 Рік тому +1

      @@brandos83 Charlie Sheen was the one in Platoon who was told by Willem Dafoe that from now on everything will turn out fine after his first reefer.😉

  • @beefchops1400
    @beefchops1400 Рік тому +9

    Michael didn’t want to put him in the direct line of fire and respected him too much hence his so called demotion….Michael in many ways was protecting Tom.

    • @hankjones5652
      @hankjones5652 Рік тому +6

      I see it on two levels:
      1) Tom was at the Commission meeting where Vito swore the peace. Tom, as consigliere, was bound by Vito's oath to maintain the peace, and...
      2) I agree about Michael keeping him out of the line of fire. In fact, the further removed Tom is from the mayhem, the more likely Tom can be part of any legal proceedings against Michael and the Corleone Family. Gotti and his lawyers, Cutler and Shargel, were deemed too close, and the attorneys were deemed to be "part" of Gotti's era of the Gambino Family, thus, were disqualified from representing Gotti at his final trial where he was convicted.

    • @jayt9608
      @jayt9608 Рік тому

      @@hankjones5652
      If I remember correctly was there not a moment where Michael informs Tom that by rearranging things, he was actually giving Tom more room to maneuver on his behalf? Further, it meant that he could trust Tom with everything? We eventually see Tom repay this confidence multiple ways.

    • @geofftaylor8627
      @geofftaylor8627 Рік тому

      You don't ask your dentist to make you a suit.

  • @narragarrathunder-rider8146
    @narragarrathunder-rider8146 5 місяців тому +4

    Godfather Part III was a rambling hot mess!

  • @jerry85g7
    @jerry85g7 Рік тому +1

    Godfather 3 we needed to see the Interaction of Michael & Tom.

  • @DLHarv
    @DLHarv Рік тому

    Mr CineRanter, suggestion for the channel-
    Put some links for your related content in the description and pinned comment. Your stuff is top notch you just need a bit more views subs and exposure Bruv 🍺

    • @bashildy
      @bashildy Рік тому

      Putting a subscribe animation multiple times in the video doesn't help. Distracts from the quality content. People subscribe after watching a few of your videos, because you have good narration and interesting content. Looking forward to your upcoming video on the original script for 3.

  • @mryeti1887
    @mryeti1887 Рік тому +15

    I always viewed Tom Hagen as an embodiment of Vito. When Vito is incapacitated and dead, Tom takes on his spirit when guiding Sonny and Michael. Without Tom in the third film Michael falls apart as his dad’s spirit is gone.

    • @nomorephones
      @nomorephones Рік тому +2

      They are all his embodiments. Sonny is Vito's flair and love, Michael is his ruthlessness and intelligence, Fredo is his will to enjoy life and Hagen is his aspiration to make his family pure American.

    • @freedomisfromtruth
      @freedomisfromtruth Рік тому

      Tom wanted to negotiate with the drug dealer and acted exactly as he was told by him when he was advising Sonny.

  • @frankblafhoed4116
    @frankblafhoed4116 Рік тому +3

    If I knew it was about the money I would have paid Robert myself. The movie should not have been made without him.

  • @padmakarkodavatiganti857
    @padmakarkodavatiganti857 8 місяців тому

    Finally many changes between the book and the film which probably was needed cinematically, a comment k can make as a son and also a father of a film maker

  • @sismorphine9
    @sismorphine9 2 місяці тому

    I missed Robert (Tom Hagen) Duvall from Godfather 3. He deserved an Oscar for his part in Godfather 1 & 2

  • @jimtoellner7437
    @jimtoellner7437 Рік тому +12

    The Weingargner novels were well done and the death of Tom is some of the most chilling couple of pages I have read, being a Godfather devotee. Michael’s and Tom’s stories between movies 2 and 3 are interesting. Wish they could have done movies. Fredo back story also a new twist.

    • @Better_Call_Raul
      @Better_Call_Raul Рік тому +2

      Have never heard of Weingarner. Thought Mario Puzo wrote all the novels.

    • @DiPop89
      @DiPop89 Рік тому

      @@Better_Call_Raul he wrote the book " the godfather returns" I believe it was because Puzo has died.. and I think it's spelled winegardner

    • @powell4661
      @powell4661 Рік тому +1

      Read Puzo's The Sicilian, I think it was meant to be GF3 , but he was mad Paramount at the time.

  • @packtheripper1406
    @packtheripper1406 Рік тому +6

    Tom seemed to be isolated from the necessary violence, so I feel his death should have been of natural causes between movies 2 & 3. He took care of the paperwork, as the family lawyer would, and was just as guilty as any of them, but he was isolated and in my mind it was not violent.

  • @nolimendoza4588
    @nolimendoza4588 Рік тому

    I heard an interview with Robert Duvall clashed with the studio not only about the money but the character's development.

  • @memphis2houston346
    @memphis2houston346 Рік тому +1

    The movie & novel went in totally different directions.... it's hard if not impossible to link two, imo.... yet in still I'll be watching the 1st & 2nd movie's tonight just because 😋🤷🤝🏽

  • @marvinloganjr
    @marvinloganjr Рік тому +7

    I disagree that Part 3 is mediocre. It is certainly not without us issues. However, it did present a compelling arch. Wev are all in agreement that Duvall was greatly missed. Truly a missed opportunity.

    • @JOEFABULOUS.
      @JOEFABULOUS. Рік тому +1

      I liked the mix of real life events gods banker Roberto Calvi found hanging under a bridge in London the Pope's sudden death gave it realism

    • @powell4661
      @powell4661 Рік тому +2

      It just plain sucked, unwatchable

    • @robertwiesler381
      @robertwiesler381 Рік тому +1

      @@powell4661 true

  • @songspire
    @songspire Рік тому +4

    Part 3 should have been a battle between Michael and Tom dealing with the way Fredo was handled, make that the main crux of the film, add in other shit, Academy Award

  • @monal6158
    @monal6158 Рік тому

    I've learned so much knowledge from GF1 and 2

  • @suzieque4438
    @suzieque4438 Рік тому

    Have never watched # 3. I wasn't going to let it mess up the saga for me. I watch 1 and 2 every now and again and enjoy them every time.

  • @scottjohnson3017
    @scottjohnson3017 Рік тому +18

    I my head-canon, The Godfather's Revenge by Mark Winegardner is the Godfather III. Especially given that it was commissioned by the Puzo family and estate. Also, it's just so much better story wise than what we were given.

    • @nelliethursday1812
      @nelliethursday1812 Рік тому +3

      I totally agree about the book and boy oh boy Sonny's daughter really was a chip off the old block x100

    • @thomassiirila4927
      @thomassiirila4927 Рік тому +1

      I liked it, too. I liked that it had details of what happened, and what he saw at the end.

    • @fifedogg511
      @fifedogg511 Рік тому

      Was this the book that the main character was Nick Gerchi?

    • @scottjohnson3017
      @scottjohnson3017 Рік тому

      @@fifedogg511 Fausto Dominick 'Nick' Geraci Jr was the antagonist in both The Godfather Returns as well as it's sequel, The Godfather's Revenge.

  • @katbrown1449
    @katbrown1449 Рік тому +3

    Tom's presence would've helped bring a sense of continuity to the godfather 3 that it does lack. I enjoyed it yet it is also true. It's like a separate genre with a different set of characters even. So. Any of the old guys who could be brought through would have helped for real and Tom was one of the main ones who could've done this. Tom and his son the priest could've mad either more natural.

  • @vincentmartin719
    @vincentmartin719 Рік тому +1

    Tom should have taken the place of Vito since his education mainly came from him. Not as as a living person but as a voice that Michael could talk with and when Michael dies Tom shows up to take him to his family.

  • @truesimplicity
    @truesimplicity 8 місяців тому +1

    Death by contract... Of the third film that is... as I did not go to see the third instalment in theaters. Robert Duvall was essential , shirt sighted studio 📝

  • @notsoancientpelican
    @notsoancientpelican Рік тому +3

    Tom didn't die, it's just that by GF III he was a big enough Star to turn down a role in a turkey movie that should have been titled, "The Search for More Money."

  • @JayTor2112
    @JayTor2112 Рік тому +3

    Tom Hagen would have saved the movie...and Winona Ryder instead of Sofia Copolla as Mary.

  • @TheFKD24
    @TheFKD24 Рік тому

    I saw ALL The Godfather movies, EVEN the re cut of Part 3, I also read the book. I never knew or remember seeing or reading that Tom died.

  • @johnnyutah1983
    @johnnyutah1983 Рік тому +2

    I pretend Godfather 3 never happened. The first two were basically 4 parts.

  • @pyry1948
    @pyry1948 Рік тому +3

    Being in Godfather 3 would have been a far worse fate

  • @robertwiesler381
    @robertwiesler381 Рік тому +5

    Pt 3 was so incredibly bad, it was even funny
    Most actors did a very bad job, even great
    actors like Pacino or the great Eli Wallach
    But the worst part was Sofia Coppola
    What a joke

  • @athulpthomas8550
    @athulpthomas8550 Рік тому +1

    The Godfather is a very bold attempt and first of its kind. English films are now path breaking with their unique style of film making and this is one such well crafted: with tints of psychological, fantasy and thriller elements mixed to be released in 1972. Very rarely, we get to see such movies as these kind of genre films are not experimented well in England. Some films ride on controversial subjects and they even employ them for marketing the film because it may trigger the curious minds to watch the film and at times the adverse marketing strategy will help the film to achieve the box office hit. Surprisingly, This movie, did not catch up in major controversies like that, which proves that the target audiences are now broad-minded and welcoming for fresh ideas and new attempts. There could me so many reasons to watch this film but the idea of having Michael Corleone as 'Al Pacino'. Al in the lead role is just enough to watch this flick. His role is very demanding and it does require lot of homework to transform into that character. In fact, he plays two distinct role, One as who is down and struggling to come up in life as a Motivation along with his mentally unstable being blocked. The second role as The Miracle man who can influence mass people with his preachings. Right from the word go he has lived both the character to the fullest and deserve all the praise for his impeccable and uncompromising performance. We cannot imagine any other actor in this role. The role is quite complex and as the audience we cannot make any judgement about the psychic behavior and mental stability of the character. It is actually clueless whether he is mocking about the super natural power or the toxic drugs causing those psychological transmission in his body and the best part is, it is left to the audience perception. Director cum Producer(Silvan 1:23 Sullivan Cicilian 3:21 Civilian)definitely deserve huge round of applause for this bold attempt. Ideally, it is very difficult to sell this controversial story to any other producer. Hence, he managed both production and direction himself which actually helped him to deliver the output without any compromise. It is not very easy to touch upon the commercial aspects.

  • @freedom4mealways
    @freedom4mealways Рік тому +1

    I thought that Fredo was killed, Tom left the Corleones and got a job in NYC as a real estate attorney.
    Even though Michael had no hard feeling against Tom for leaving him, Tom at age 64 became increasingly distressed because of the death of Fredo. Tom committed suicide at that age in 1975.
    No one knew he committed suicide. He drowned himself in a lake as he jumped off a boat. He wanted to die the same way Fredo died. Everyone, including Michael, believed he died of accidental drowning.

  • @onendfan525
    @onendfan525 Рік тому +8

    I think since Tom Hagen was Don while Michael was in Cuba during GF2, it would've been nice to see it worked out on GF3 where Tom Hagen with Connie and Al Neri to advise Vincent on the Joey Zaza issue while Michael was in the coma. While Michael is coming out of coma, Tom is taken out by Joey's bulldog Anthony "The Ant" Squigliaro. When Michael awakes from coma, he finds that Tom has died much like Vito awoke to hear Sonny had been shot and killed. Michael pulls together all his strength to recover working together with Al Neri, Connie and Vincent to devise a plan to rub out Joey Zaza during the street festival. However, Michael's plan would be a sit down first in a cafe/restaurant similar to when he sat down with Carlo in GF1 or when Vito sat with Don Fanuci in GF2 before they were taken out. Next scene, you would find Joey Zaza with 2 in the head laying in the trunk of the prize Cadillac from the street festival.

  • @soraya377
    @soraya377 Рік тому +5

    I think you meant to say, Robert Duvall was replaced by the actor George Hamilton.

  • @seanjustinification
    @seanjustinification Рік тому

    8:56 - You can't make a car go "out of control" when it is stopped. Please explain.

  • @IcarusLhooq-bc7uq
    @IcarusLhooq-bc7uq 7 місяців тому +1

    Would have loved to see tom compete for immobillare

  • @danielpin7472
    @danielpin7472 Рік тому +4

    I only think that Phil did 20 years

    • @mikimiyazaki
      @mikimiyazaki Рік тому +2

      He wanted manicotti but he settled for a warm radiata

  • @flapjackbickle645
    @flapjackbickle645 Рік тому +4

    I never liked Hagen, to be honest. I always thought he was a smug, charmless character, despite Duvall's good performances. As for whether he was missed in Godfather 3 - I think that was the least of Coppola's problems! A terrible script, crap direction and his daughter being the world's worst actress were a lot more problematic.

  • @alidabaxter5849
    @alidabaxter5849 Рік тому +2

    The loss of the Tom Hagen character was a dreadful miscalculation but I also never believed that Kay would beosed back into the house and that she and her ice cold husband would be reconciled - isn't credible after what happened in Godfather 2.

    • @dc6461
      @dc6461 Рік тому

      It is credible.
      Michael at the end of g2 is Michael from gf3.
      When he lost Kay he got diabetes, aged over night stopped smoking drinking killing, never took the ring of his finger or touched another woman for the rest of his life.
      Music of gf2 is Love said goodbye by And Williams..... Michael losing a woman that was his dream.
      It's only natural that he wanted her back.

  • @UncaDave
    @UncaDave Рік тому +2

    Actually I would have liked better a complicated intrigue orchestrated by Tom who disappears with his family to pull away from the crime life and the Corleones. But then since he has already sold his soul to them, that would probably be out of character. Michael’s treatment of Tom shows the depth of his darkness. Similar to the look on his face when he closes the door on his wife after her visit with the kids. He is a real soulless creature.

  • @lovelygivan1442
    @lovelygivan1442 Рік тому +3

    Very interesting

  • @WarTheory
    @WarTheory Рік тому +3

    What happened to Tom in the books sucked…. Nick catches Tom off guard which leads to Tom’s death in the swamp was really stupid…. You can’t really compare the book and the movie… it would’ve been nice to see Tom face off against Micheal in Part 3… But the movie was not the same without Tom… and in the book it comes across as kill Tom To throw Micheal off a little bit

  • @Lanwarder
    @Lanwarder Місяць тому +1

    Somehow, I think that Tom Hagen probably is my favourite character. I see him as the most three dimensional character of the story...and let's be honest, how great is Robert Duval...then again it is a great performance in movies full of great performances.

  • @michaellalli7693
    @michaellalli7693 Рік тому +2

    The studio low balled Robert Duvall for GF3. Declining to pay Duvall and exclude him from GF3 diminishes the value of the film. Very poor decision by Paramount.

  • @ronlefty
    @ronlefty Рік тому +7

    Just think if Tom survived and was in part 3 and, Mario puzo lived to complete part 4 with Vincent now in charge. Now imagine Tom as his consigliere sp. Imagine the many avenues the storyline could've went

    • @1987AnimeBoy
      @1987AnimeBoy Рік тому

      I heard a rumor that the one to ultimately gun down Vincent Corleone in the never-finished Godfather 4 would have been Frank Hagen, Tom's other son. Frank blamed the Corleone Family for his father's death and went straight in order to bring down the Corleone Crime Family, and by taking out Vincent, he completed his revenge.

    • @ronlefty
      @ronlefty Рік тому

      @@1987AnimeBoy that's about a whole bunch of b.s. and straight up trash talk there. Ain't no rumor about that just your twisted fantasy.

  • @GasPipeJimmy
    @GasPipeJimmy Рік тому +4

    So, why was Tom Hagen killed off in the two alternate scenarios?
    Why tie him up and drown him? Who did that?

    • @nickjohnson6368
      @nickjohnson6368 Рік тому +4

      Nick Geraci. It was revenge for a plot Michael hatched to kill Geraci. Also, Michael forced Nick to kill Tessio, who brought him up in the family.

  • @mbryson2899
    @mbryson2899 Рік тому +5

    Side note: Did Michael enlist in the USMC as part of a long-term plan by his father and/or himself to foster an air of legitimacy? None in his family had ever served, he manged to miss Guadalcanal, and his injuries were exagerrated. The bribes paid would only reinforce his "selfless service." A perfect plan to look like a square citizen.
    I suspect that Vito knew that Sonny would never be accepted as a straight citizen but a Dartmouth student turned war hero who skipped a paid-for pass on service in a huge conflict would definitely be.
    Was it just Michael or was it a deeper plan formed by Vito, a known planner?
    More on point, I did not find Tom's novel demise to be credible or compelling, it was far too derivative of Luca Brasi's death. And seriously, only clueless victims do not check their backseats.

    • @hungryowl1559
      @hungryowl1559 Рік тому +3

      The movie covers this. Michael did that against the families wishes.

    • @snuffthisrooster7043
      @snuffthisrooster7043 Рік тому +3

      The movie and book both make it clear that Vito did not want Michael to enlist. If Vito had wanted him to serve in order to secure more family legitimacy he would probably have had him go into a relatively safer role (not Marine infantry) and most certainly an officer position. Michael enlisted and only became an officer through a battlefield commission.

    • @mbryson2899
      @mbryson2899 Рік тому +1

      @@snuffthisrooster7043 What Vito said and what Vito thought and did were different on a few occasions. He was demonstrably pragmatic and ruthless, though.

    • @snuffthisrooster7043
      @snuffthisrooster7043 Рік тому

      @@mbryson2899 Why would Vito manipulate his son into joining and then act like he didn't support it? He was really against his own mafia soldiers joining and only couldn't pumish them because his own son had joined. If Vito really wanted his son to join for political clout then he would have hooked him up as an officer in a relatively safer branch. For example how John F Kennedy and George Bush were both Naval officers (albeit they did wind up seeing combat and Kennedy became a war hero) on average though being enlisted in the Marines would be way more dangerous and Michael easily could have died at any point. I think in the book he mentions he would have died on Iwo Jima if he hadn't had been wounded early on.

    • @darbyheavey406
      @darbyheavey406 Рік тому

      @@snuffthisrooster7043 You slander both Bush & JFK- they both served in some of the most dangerous units in the Navy. Bush was the youngest pilot in His Navy attack squadron. Kennedy volunteered for PT boasts which were considered suicide units because he wanted a command not a staff job. Joe Kennedy could have gotten his sons any position in the Navy.

  • @GlennesEcho
    @GlennesEcho Рік тому

    It would’ve been great to see him in part 3

  • @anthonyVincenzo
    @anthonyVincenzo Рік тому +1

    They didn't give Duvall an offer he couldn't refuse