“No one has a national interest in a unilateral declaration of Syria's future” w/ Omar S. Dahi

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @lucapresents4790
    @lucapresents4790 Місяць тому +2

    it's so refreshing to have for non Arabic speakers such quality of analysis, thank you gents

  • @ianwellens3169
    @ianwellens3169 Місяць тому +15

    Thank you, Makdisis: yet another great discussion - I appreciate them very much. Just one slightly frustrating thing, for me, and that is that I wish you had asked him directly about US and Israeli connections to / support for / backing of HTS and its antecedents.
    Because this question is 'The Big One', isn't it? To what extent have these forces been supported, guided, enabled by the US & Israel? That feels like a bit of an omission to me.

    • @maioio
      @maioio Місяць тому

      A part of that "bit of an ommision" (and only a part) is called Timber Sycamore. A "bit of an ommision" consisting in CIA spending one billion dollars per year in foreign yihadists since 2011.

    • @geminye-j1c
      @geminye-j1c Місяць тому +1

      No? If Turkey controls them, which it does, and it is a member of nato, which it is, and the other financial backer is Qatar, an ally of the US, then Israel and the US can support these forces indirectly without ever getting their hands dirty with direct support, and Turkey and Qatar would never expose them.. so realistically, how could you know, and why is this alignment in doubt, or you want evidence of direct support?

    • @maioio
      @maioio Місяць тому

      "Timber Sycamore" for example?

  • @lsheble3613
    @lsheble3613 Місяць тому +1

    Merci. Really appreciate hearing from someone working towards a positive future for the Syrian people. A lot to think about.

  • @mariesc5996
    @mariesc5996 Місяць тому +6

    Finally, a complete overview of the situation. Thank you so very much.

  • @BAYucdavis2
    @BAYucdavis2 Місяць тому +3

    Thank you all for this in-depth, wide-ranging discussion. A follow-up discussion with Dr Dahi after March 1 would be most appreciated as some of the dust will probably have settled by then.

  • @cityguildsexams
    @cityguildsexams Місяць тому +6

    who has been funding HTS for all these years? As Assad recently found out, armies don't fight for free.

  • @zacoolm
    @zacoolm Місяць тому +6

    Good details provided by the professor however contradictory at times e.g talking about Imperialism while calling for “sovereignty” ,implicitly, by peaceful means. He is for greater Syria but never once mentioned Palestine when discussing Iran in Syria. He said the resistance was decimated which is inaccurate and frankly points to lack of understanding of the philosophy of resistance and the history of national liberation movements including the Syrian people struggle against colonialism. To say “well” Syria was occupied during Assad! Yes but he did not give it to them. In the end the professor as an academic in a western institution will view the world from his own class position. I will finish the last twenty minutes but do have a couple of grains of salt handy.

    • @geminye-j1c
      @geminye-j1c Місяць тому +1

      Yeah I agree I had the same apprehension

  • @Aparview
    @Aparview Місяць тому +4

    stand with Palestine.

  • @franceshasso1212
    @franceshasso1212 Місяць тому +5

    This Carnegie Endowment affiliated economist is contradictory throughout. Not addressing the geopolitical set up and avoiding US devastating sanctions and occupation of Syria -- and Israel. Covering his US ideological and material bases and underestimating the sectarianism question. I disagree it was thought provoking. It illustrates the state of middle east studies in the west. Exactly, how can you have sovereignty without resistance?

  • @amanariza3571
    @amanariza3571 Місяць тому +5

    🌟Honesty in a dishonest media world. Keep up the good work Makdisi brothers.

  • @geminye-j1c
    @geminye-j1c Місяць тому

    32:50 this is false. Oil (Rasafa oil field) and gas (the largest, Sha’er, is in TADMUR/PALMYRA!) producing regions of Syria are NOT located exclusively in the northeast. I guess SDF now controls the area of Rasafa? And the Amerikkkan aggression has also taken the region of Palmyra. But before Dec 8, it (the oil and the gas fields I mentioned) WAS under government control!
    Regions relevant to the petro-economy of Syria (refineries, generators) are even more so not located exclusively in the northeast. I wish people would stop claiming this.

    • @geminye-j1c
      @geminye-j1c Місяць тому

      33:48 I find it strange that this expert did not point out the incorrect statement which the host made.

    • @geminye-j1c
      @geminye-j1c Місяць тому

      For example the baniyas refinery has been in the news a lot. That’s obviously not in the northwest. Was the question about only oil, meaning to exclude gas? In that case sha’er may be less relevant, but that would be a strange sort of question.

    • @geminye-j1c
      @geminye-j1c Місяць тому

      There are also a lot of gas fields off the coast of Latakia

  • @yoavsapir8146
    @yoavsapir8146 Місяць тому +1

    Love the Zionist poster on the wall ❤