This Is What Pokemon Fans Wanted
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 бер 2024
- I'm so excited for Pokemon z-a these games are gonna be wild..
#trending #gaming #pokemon
The Discord: / discord
Second Channel: / @frosslashyt
Twitch: / marchbaby_ishere
Twitter: / marchbabyishere
Instagram: marchbaby_i...
Tik tok: / marchbaby_ismyboo
Don't send hate to anyone in this video please and thank you
Gaming
Gaming commentary
Commentary
Marchbaby
Marchbaby_ishere
March
Drama
Drama channel
Movies
Movie Reviews
Pokemon
Palworld
Pokemon drama
Palworld drama
Pokemon Day
Pokemon presents
Pokemon z
Pokemon z-a
Pokemon x and y
Pokemon x
Pokemon y
Mega
mega evolution
Twitter
Twitter drama
New pokemon
new pokemon game
Fall guys - Ігри
![ПОЛНАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ЭКЗОРЦИЗМА [Топ Сикрет]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qBySr6Bt0B8/mqdefault.jpg)
I hope legends is Co-Op me and my GF just bought the DLC for Scarlet and Violet. We beat the dex in the OG game and now shiny hunting the Teal Mask and will move onto indigo disk later this week. We played pal worlds and loved it open worldness and the 32 player Co-Op, I ran a hosted server and enjoyed every bit. If the Pokémon company follows suit this franchise could thrive. One thing i do hope they bring back is SHINY SOUNDS!!!!
I have played Pokémon since gen 4 consistently but scarlet and violet just weren't it for me. I dont hate them but i played through it twice 1 on launch and then a few months ago but both times they just felt lacking. I enjoy replaying through the games multiple times with different teams but i also want lots more content in the games other than just catch em all and beat the gyms and champion. We used to get big side portions of the game with musicals or contests or bases or battle frontier or whatever but these games once the story is done its mostly just explore this boring open world and catch pokemon. Id much rather have a detailed linear world than a bland open world.
So, I don't think we'll get too much expansion on the war aspect of X and Y. While it will be a Legends game, its about the building up the city in the games recent history, not the war that took place 3000 years ago... 2800ish years before Z-A will take place. The war will be just as much a 'legend' in Z-A as it was in X and Y. We might get a little new info, but it'll be a side focus if anything.
That being said, im still excited. Haha.
That's what I thought I knew for sure it wasn't just gonna be straight up the war but I just hope they try to tell us more about it since it was such a cool part of the story in x and y. I'm mostly hoping for more story about zygarde since he deserves some more love.
Bro, this is peak content creation this needs more views
Double mega shiny rayquaza or no balls
can't wait to play it with you :D
Im an avid pokemon fan and I didnt like scarlet and violet. The graphics are horrible and the lack of level scaling and direction made playing the game extremely unenjoyable. I love the new pokemon though.
I can understand that it's okay to not like the new games not everyone is going to like some of the games for example my least favorite gen is 1 and 3 but those are widely loved by many I'm not against people not liking the new gen I'm just against people who call it a scam by just taking one look at it
I’m glad, idk why people were clawing and reaching out for a goy Slop Gen 5 & 2 remake
I mean I will say gen 2 and 5 are in my opinion some of the best games we've ever got but thats why I think they need to take their time and make an amazing remake and not do another bdsp
Black and white is not the only ones with 2 parts 🙃,also 90 bucks for a fully glitched game is in fact a scam.
Black and white is in fact the only games in the series with a 1 and 2 also the game isn't 90 dollars dude this is what I mean by people who don't pay attention to the game and only look at the glitches from the outside your opinion is invalid dude
@@Marchbaby_IsEvil it’s $90 in its complete state (with dlc). maybe think before you call someone’s opinion invalid. Or you know posting a UA-cam video. Talk about low effort content, you didn’t even try to see things from the other side. You just called people who disagree with you fake fans. grow up.
@Mr.IndoorPants this just isn't true.. there are plenty of people who don't like the new games and that's fine what I don't like is people who just barely put effort into looking into the games and call it a scam or ridicule others for liking it. Also no it's not $90 the game is $60 the dlc is a choice that doesn't mean the game is $90. Just because the game in full comes out to $90 doesn't mean the game is a total of $90 if you want to use that logic the games are actually $180 since you have to factor in the cost of both games with dlcs. Again I don't hate or get mad at people for disliking the game if you don't like it I understand not everyone is supposed to like the game each generation has its own Fandom but I'll say it again it'll never be okay to ridicule others for enjoying something they love and just blatantly calling it a "scam" when it really isn't.
@@Marchbaby_IsEvil the games are $90 if you want 1/4th of the national dex and postgame content. That was all standard in the games that released in three versions (For half the price with twice the polish).
No one is telling you that you can’t enjoy the Pokémon games. Many people complain about the company and the state of the games, but they are entitled to share their opinions.
The fact that you’re upset by those opinions is on you. If I got upset every time someone shared an opinion online that I didn’t agree with I would be miserable constantly. You need to realize that It’s not an attack on you it’s a plea for the Pokémon company to do better. As such, there isn’t any reason you should feel the need to defend yourself or the Pokémon company for that mater. (Given the blatantly poor state of their recent games). You can enjoy them and still criticize them where and when they fell short.
If you want to make the argument that the Pokémon company isn’t scamming people out of money, put some thought and research into dexit and Pokémon home, and make a reasoned argument rather than saying people aren’t true fans unless they love everything the Pokémon company does. I think that topic is perfectly debatable considering we can’t know what conversations happen between the Pokémon executives behind closed doors. But to me, the current system seems very anti-consumer to say the least.
This is genuinely a great video
Piplup better be one of the starter choices so I can have a mega Empoleon
My predictions for the starters is piplup, litten, and Chespin I feel like piplup HAS to be on there or at least 1 gen 4 starter
@@Marchbaby_IsEvil my predictions is piplup tepig and chespin
@Grassmonkey3220 tepig isn't bad I feel like they might do snivy or tepig but for sure there isn't any gen 1 or 3 since they all have megas
@@Marchbaby_IsEvil I could see them doing snivy but I like tepig more and yeah they definitely aren’t having a gen 1 or 3 starter but they are gonna have a mega charizard z
@@Grassmonkey3220 they might actually do that idk how much id like it but its alright
I know you're not trying to be like this, but "If you're an actual real pokéman fan, you'll know that SV was fun" sounds kinda gatekeepy. I personally did love the games, especially the characters, the higher level of challenge, and the exploration. I thought it was one of the best games yet, certainly one of the best 3d games. But I also understand how some people could be offput by the lack of polish. I actually have my own perspective on the lack of polish. I think the lack of polish was a necessary poison, in a way, to force the pokémon company to realize how rushed Gamefreak are, and to further allow them to listen to have more time to develop.
I agree with you I point out in the video that they should have taken their time and i do agree that this game needed to be polished. What I mean by real pokemon fans isn't the fact that you have to find the game fun or good but mostly real pokemon fans don't ridicule others for enjoying the game or finding it fun there's nothing wrong with not liking the game cause everyone has their own taste some people are gonna hate gen 3 and love gen 3 for an example each gen has their own Fandoms. But a real fan isn't going to take one look at it and say "THEY'RE SCAMMING YOU" without at least giving it a try or at least looking into the small details because tbh the only people who are hating scarlet and violet are mostly just people who hate pokemon because their such a profitable company not because they're ex fans who lost interest.
1. Games, in general, have been coming out imcomplete and buggy for awhile and people are tired of it and avid fans thought that pokemon were one of the games that they thought it would be different then Scarlet and Violet came out bugged that literally made the game crash no they have cleaned it up but they never or do not know how to fix all the issues not saying the game was not good for what it was made to do but just overly buggy due to the messy coding
2. I grew up with pokemon but the story started to feel the same and got too easy I migrated to Digimon after Platinum and enjoyed that show and games more , and still do, probably cause of the better creature design and a bit more mature stories. Only got scarlet and violet to do something with one of my friends and to see how they handled a true open would and I was disappointed since other open world on the switch run better and without bugs.
3. no game will kill pokeomon, in the west, the REAL pokemon killer is time, for the games at least, since they are lossing fans then they are gaining and most of younger generations are interested in pokemon, but in Japan pokemon is more popular then ever
I sort of disagree as for me I enjoyed scarlet and violet. I'd consider it one of their best games if only it came out finished. But in the end the bugs from what I experienced and most experienced was just limbs being bigger and the character glitching in the co op stuff which I'd argue it's pretty funny but since it's pokemon people don't find it funny which kind of sucks cause so many other games have fun weird glitches that get praised but when it comes to games like Pokémon it weighs it down and so many people I feel blow it off before even trying it. The stories are sort of similar every time but I feel like it isn't lazy it's deep and interesting to follow since a lot of the region's kind of mesh together with their stories which makes for a good experience but I can understand when someone doesn't care for the games anymore and that's okay I just appreciate it when people at least try them before judging them.
@@Marchbaby_IsEvil not saying the game was fun with the 2 other stories added in but I was disappointed with the performance of the bugs, fps drops, turns being skipped sometimes in raids
@@Marchbaby_IsEvil I think Pokemon S&V had one of the best stories in the main line games. I also had a bunch of fun playing this game. Nonetheless am i really disappointed in the pokemon company and gamefreak. Releasing the game in such a state is an insult to all pokemon fans. Be it the bugs or the graphics in general, is simply unacceptable if we live in the same timeline that TOTK released. You cannot tell me that the biggest franchise in the world can make a game look and play worse than what the Palworld devs did, where most of the team dont even know how UE works or how to animate models. The success of Palworld shows how much people want those style of games. A true openworld that isnt ugly as hell and runs smooth. Also being able to ride many different creatures and not only having the same one do everything. Making the creatures in your box have more meaning than just being left in the dust. Using them to do work like how it is portrayed in the anime. There is so much missed potential in pokemon. They have so much money and they dont spend it on developing good games. As much as i like S&V i really dislike the companys mindset. I am glad they are taking their time with Legends ZA but i have no hope anymore.
BTW why dont we have more spinoff games on the switch? Where is the next mystery dungeon? Maybe a new ranger or conquest entry? New Pokken? Nothing?
And why only do 3D games, why no 2,5D remake of DPPt in the style of Octopath Traveler? That would have made the OG fans propably more happy than whatever BDSP was.
I love pokemon but currently i am busy playing palworld and all those digimon games i missed in the last 10 years.
_"If you're an actual, real Pokémon fan, you'll know that game was fun"_
What an incredibly naive take.
... It might be a fun game if you are able to ignore the obvious performance issues, horrible size scaling choice (why is 5/8th of the pokedex smaller than the grass texture) , and heavy-handed predatory marketing tactics used to get you to spend *more* money on secondary services (aka _Pokémon Home_ to mitigate Dexit & _Nintendo Online_ / DLC to obtain even basic series features like double battles.)
You're missing the point... the point is that many people write these games off as bad before trying them they'll take one look at it and say "THEY'RE SCAMMING YOU" when in reality the games in itself are actually really fun and enjoyable to many REAL pokemon fans. I don't really think a real pokemon fan is someone who likes to ridicule others for enjoying the newer generations just because "Gen 1-3 were better than it just fell off"
saying something along the lines of _'You're not a real pokemon fan if you don't find Scarlet / Violet fun, even if your criticisms of the game are valid."_ is an *INCREDIBLY* awful take, dude.
I would say a real "pokemon fan" would understand that saying the game franchise has dramatically shifted from the spirit of "Pocket-Monsters" to _Capitalized Nostalgia_ (with a hefty dose of non-repeating battle gimmicks, performance issues / bugs, and semi-necessary paid services to experience the full game) is an absolutely fair criticism.
My opinion: S/V wasn't dogshit, but It was overwhelmingly disappointing with a few good features that probably wont make it into the next game. And we as consumers are absolutely within our right to say "hey Gamefreak, your products aren't up to the quality they once were, and we don't like the inconsistencies in your feature selection"
@Marchbaby_ishere Side note: it's absurd people shill for $90,000,000,000+ companies by taking criticism for the product as personal attacks.
_"hurr de durr old fan said the new _*_star war_*_ "no good", but I like new _*_star war_*_ because pretty. Old fans big-mean for saying _*_I_*_ no good"_
@FartInhalerSlamPoetry again man I'm not saying you have to like the newer games I'm saying if you're one of those fans who only plays the older games and ridicules others for liking the newer games than your point should be invalid. A real pokemon fan is someone who can respect others opinions on the said games and if you don't like scarlet and violet that's fine but running around calling it a scam and pleading to people to not buy it and ridiculing others for liking it is wrong the game is fun by many peoples standards and idk why I have to explain that to you but that's just facts. I understand you might not like how it turned out and that's fine but again this isn't a scam game and it's all around a good game.
@FartInhalerSlamPoetry I'm also not saying that you're not allowed to say to gamefreak that they aren't giving us what we want if you watch my video I'm very excited and pleased with the fact that they're pushing ZA back to 2025 and state that they are "listening to us" I'm not saying we as consumers aren't allowed to criticize the game and the company. What I'm saying is most people who wrote this game and many recent games off as bad are people who either 1. Never played pokemon and just hate billion dollar companies and 2. Probably only ever played the old games and hold that mindset of only the old games are good and anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional
lets get something straight, a game being fun and a game being good are two different things, for example, there is a group of people who love security breach BECAUSE it is so bad. I love scarlet and violet, they are probably top five games in the series for me, maybe sixth, but that doesnt mean the game isnt shite, the story is decent, the gameplay is decent but the performance is genuinely terrible, and that isnt a non factor, again, I loved it and played more than once, but a non dedicated fan disliking the game , for instance my friend, who only played through the first 3rd of the game because he could hardly run it. That is a bad game, if a game is only considered good by the existing fanbase then it cannot draw in new players effectively. Which is the entire point of making a game, therefore it fails at its job, and isnt a good product. I would say a good description for scar/viol is that they have good elements, not that its a good game
I disagree, SWSH and Scar/Vio both have sold insane amounts of copys and you also have to factor in legends these games didn't fail at all and I've said this to others there's nothing wrong with feeling like the game doesn't look good or run good but that ultimately doesn't make the games bad. If you're someone who ran through 1-3 than stopped I feel like their arguments of "these new games suck" are extremely invalid given the fact that they haven't even played 4-6 even. REAL pokemon fans are people who give the games a shot and thoroughly enjoy the games they don't have to like every gen and that's fine some people think these games are the greatest of all time and some think their the worst but at the end of the day these games didn't fail and they were good.
@@Marchbaby_IsEvil I meant to mention it but i forgot, I also think Legends was really good, and also my friend, had played Sw/SH, Firered, and Omega Ruby, he liked the game, but he could not play it because he has a Switch Light and not a regular switch and it was repeatedly crashing. I really do think S/V have alot of good elements but they were very rushed and that held them back from being a quality product
@onefatboiikado8436 no for sure like I say in my video if they would have taken their time this game would have came out finished and looking amazing but instead they rushed it in what I assume is what they thought what we wanted and I feel like ZA is a prime example of pokemon being a quality company that actually listens to their fans given the fact that they for once are actually pushing the game back till 2025. But I think you're free to not like these new games or others in general everyone has their own taste for pokemon games I just don't really care for the blind hate that the games receive
@@Marchbaby_IsEvil I definitely understand that last sentence, and I also dont hate the new games, as I said they are probably my 6th fav, and Legends is probably my 3rd, but as you mentioned, they were rushed, I do not think ZA will be rushed and I am quite excited for it even tho I love gen 5, I'm ok with them not remaking it, because gen 5 games were very story centric and them going in an open world direction clashes with that slightly
@onefatboiikado8436 Gen 5 was my first games ever and idk if I'm just biased but they're arguably the best games in the entire series if pokemon remakes those games they need a lot of time and they need to make it right and I think thats why we aren't getting gen 5 remakes cause they know they can't mess up gen 5 remakes
(I thought your video was quite interesting, so I'll be a couple of comments on various topics you cover) I think that the main reason that people were like "Palworld is the pokémon killer rahhhh!!" Is because like, 90% of the "Palworld fanbase" are just rabid pokémon fans who haven't played anything other than pokémon in 20 years and rather than branching out and playing anything else, they're mad that pokémon isn't stuffing every other genre and mechanic from other games into their series.
Even Palworld fans admit that that game has nothing original to offer. And that's why palworld just frustrates me. It's not because it's a "pokémon like" game. Because other monster catching games are usually UNIQUE. I'm frustrated because Palworld, a game that openly admits to not being creative, and is clearly marketed through nothing but pure controversy, is gaining such massive success. It's an insult to anyone who likes creativity and genuinity in their media.
And palworld defenders make the most stupid arguments on the planet to defend the game. And somehow people believe them. "Pokémon doesn't own the rights to fictional anime creatures!! Of course this looks like this pokémon, everything looks like a pokémon!" No. Other monster catching games DON'T HAVE THAT PROBLEM. Their creatures look unique. But Palworld mixes and matches pokémon anatomy/physical features like some sort of "3d pokémon fusion generator." And pocketpair (palworld's developer) isn't just messing with "the big bad lazy GameFreak". They were also are trying to rip off Breath of the Wild, and apparently now they're helping make a Hollow Knight clone. (Stealing from an indie team.) And people still defend them????
THIS is exactly how I feel about palworlds so well put together
@@Marchbaby_IsEvil Yeah, thanks! I guess you could say I tend to have a ton of thoughts on games and art in general. I would love to share those thoughts. I, like you said, am pretty passionate about pokémon, since it was a big part of my childhood. I'd like to be a content creator one day, and I even tried making a full sized video last year! I tried to analyzed the SV trailers before the game came out. I'm not the greatest at editing, and I wasn't right about all my predictions, but I was right about the game being a big improvement over gen 8. And I did really enjoy the game.
I know this might sound a bit odd, since this is the first video of yours that I've seen, but I like the energy you give off! Maybe we could get in contact and find a way to help each other, if you're interested in making more content like this, especially about pokémon, since I think it's a super interesting series with an interesting history and an interesting fanbase. Just a friendly offer.
@p4rm3s34n It's not odd at all if you want you can add me on Twitter or discord whichever one is easier and just hit me up and we can work something out
@@Marchbaby_IsEvil Sorry, I wasn't able to make your discord work. I'd need to get a new link. I try to stay off Twitter
Palworld > Pokemon Legends Z-A. Should've been a Unova remake, fuck Kalos.
Erm actually that's not true
Cope
You want a remake after the BDSP shit?
@@Polavianusyes, BDSP wasn't a good remake. That is true. But just because we got one subpar remake doesn't mean that other remakes will be. Gamefreak was in hot water for SWSH, even before it was released. People (including me) hated the world structure, the inconsistent style, the battle gimmicks, etc. And up until BDSP, Gamefreak had made it's remakes in the same engine, and with the style as the game of their generation. But I'm pretty sure gamefreak knew that we didn't want more SWSH. So I'm pretty sure they didn't know what to do. And I'm glad they didn't try to dumb down Gen 4 and stuff their stupid "pokémon but giant" mechanic in there. Yeah, I wish we could have truly expanded the sinnoh region, but I understand the difficulty of that, and the only thing I'm really mad about is the fact that it was based it on DP, instead of the superior version (platinum).