@@Number-s9h Then it wouldn't be MY past you've changed. It would be some new "me" in the new timeline. In fact, since he's newly "created", his new past wouldn't have been changed, either. I love time travel stories, but Hollywood seldom if ever gets them right.
@@Hunpecked not newly created, but preexisting. I go back and change time lines. All possibilities coexist, but since you don't know I left your timeline and followed a different path for you, by changing a significant action in your past, from my perspective I have changed your history without you knowing. Except the other you does know and always has known. To have and have not changed your future. The original you no change to the other you with a different future no change, but to me you have a different future. The many worlds not Copenhagen hypothesis.
@@Number-s9h So multiverse, then. So far so good. Now if I understand you correctly, you transport to an alternate reality, find the alternate "me", examine "my" past, and find something to change. You go back in time in the alternate reality, change something, and "my" life in the future is changed. The problem is, as soon as you find "me" in the alternate reality, that becomes part of YOUR past. Changing "my" past changes "my" future, which is part of your past, which you can't change. That's one problem with "The Time Machine" (2002). When the Traveller sees the future filled with Morlocks, that becomes part of his past, which can't be changed for the reasons explained by the chief Morlock.
@Hunpecked No. The alternate you already exists. I find something in your past to change before going into the past. Once in the past I change it and end up in that alternate timeline with the changed you. The original you would not be aware of this and not changed. The alternate you would not know of the original you. Of course I would need a time ship to do this as being able to pinpoint the space-time coordinates with precision would be impossible due to the uncertainty principle. Some saucer shaped spaceship that can time jump will be needed. You can't just ride a chair or step into a portal and be magically still on earth. The chief morlock is actually a Raith if you have seen Stargate Atlantis.
Simple: She starts out in 2015, then travels back to 2006, then back to 1997, then back to 1988. You watch from the man prospective as he travels forward in time.
One book wouldn’t enlist people that much to start a war. At best it can only instill some ideas, and mostly just confirm others they already had. In other words, the book is just the last straw that broke the persons back.
@ not necessarily. The book was A catalyst, not the only one. The real catalyst were the results of WWI, and hitlers reaction to it. His book had a tiny effect compared to everything else he did, and how the country felt at that time. I’d go so far as to saw even Hitler was necessary. It he wasn’t the person that pushed the country, there easily would have been somebody else since many others were feeling the same as he was. But his book is clearly not it. I’d say the communist manifesto had more influence than hitlers book.
The marvelous adventures of Barron trump. Written around 1900. It s very creepy and is about Barron finding a time traveling worm hole in the very far north in Russia. This book I would dare to say is a warning of prophecy and how destructive the Trump family is and I always felt that Baron would grow to be very dangerous. Imagine him being as wicked as his father but with smarts. I couldn’t read the whole thing as it was to surreal. I even verified things about his character that were an exact match of his character. Sounds silly I know, but I never underestimate the things we don’t see or know.
I don't understand, it says at the end her travels back in time are only one directional, but she does travel back to the future. I guess I am not getting the meaning. I also don't get the time paradox, of if she fixes the future, then there isn't a messed up future that allows her to go back in time to fix, unless she only fixes a different time streams future while her future is always doomed and so time travel isn't really time travel but parallel universe travel. Whatever, whole thing is just goofy, but the acting was good and the characters are good. I like the movie.
One of those movies by Hollywood Democrats' and their "war" against Patriotism. (and the "Patriarchy") Glad this period now looks like it's something of the past.
This is BS! Forget all the woke messaging, this movie is a good example of the grandfather paradox. The whole reason for time travelling is the war in 2024 but if the war doesn't happen then the redbone won't travel back in time which means the author won't die which then causes the war in 2024 to start all over again. It's a freaking time loop!!!
Loved the movie and the recap, don’t think to deeply about time travel, it doesn’t add up.
too*
I adore your style! You’re doing an excellent job.
This is an AI content farm channel. No style to it.
"arrest all the girls in the city with blue hoodie" -
I love the thought of both time travel and parallel/multiple dimensions theories.
Oh no. You can't fool me. I saw "The Time Machine" (2002), so I know you can't change the past. 😀
I can change your past, but you will not know about it ! Multiple timelines.
@@Number-s9h Then it wouldn't be MY past you've changed. It would be some new "me" in the new timeline. In fact, since he's newly "created", his new past wouldn't have been changed, either.
I love time travel stories, but Hollywood seldom if ever gets them right.
@@Hunpecked not newly created, but preexisting. I go back and change time lines. All possibilities coexist, but since you don't know I left your timeline and followed a different path for you, by changing a significant action in your past, from my perspective I have changed your history without you knowing. Except the other you does know and always has known. To have and have not changed your future. The original you no change to the other you with a different future no change, but to me you have a different future. The many worlds not Copenhagen hypothesis.
@@Number-s9h So multiverse, then. So far so good.
Now if I understand you correctly, you transport to an alternate reality, find the alternate "me", examine "my" past, and find something to change. You go back in time in the alternate reality, change something, and "my" life in the future is changed.
The problem is, as soon as you find "me" in the alternate reality, that becomes part of YOUR past. Changing "my" past changes "my" future, which is part of your past, which you can't change.
That's one problem with "The Time Machine" (2002). When the Traveller sees the future filled with Morlocks, that becomes part of his past, which can't be changed for the reasons explained by the chief Morlock.
@Hunpecked No. The alternate you already exists. I find something in your past to change before going into the past. Once in the past I change it and end up in that alternate timeline with the changed you. The original you would not be aware of this and not changed. The alternate you would not know of the original you. Of course I would need a time ship to do this as being able to pinpoint the space-time coordinates with precision would be impossible due to the uncertainty principle. Some saucer shaped spaceship that can time jump will be needed. You can't just ride a chair or step into a portal and be magically still on earth.
The chief morlock is actually a Raith if you have seen Stargate Atlantis.
Enjoyable recap of this film.
What movie is that??
In the Shadow of the Moon 2019
It's displayed on the screen the ENTIRE time! 👀
12 👍's up MM thank you for sharing 🤗
I'm confused. She only time travels backwards and yet she keeps meeting her grandfather getting older??
Simple: She starts out in 2015, then travels back to 2006, then back to 1997, then back to 1988. You watch from the man prospective as he travels forward in time.
This movie start off slow, and confusing, but then gets good.
I'm confused. She only time travels backwards and yet she keeps meeting her grandfather getting older??
One book wouldn’t enlist people that much to start a war. At best it can only instill some ideas, and mostly just confirm others they already had. In other words, the book is just the last straw that broke the persons back.
What about Mein Kampf?
@ same thing, the book was only a catalyst.
@@Eddy002 removal of the catalyst (book) and the ring leaders were necessary to change the timeline
@ not necessarily. The book was A catalyst, not the only one. The real catalyst were the results of WWI, and hitlers reaction to it. His book had a tiny effect compared to everything else he did, and how the country felt at that time. I’d go so far as to saw even Hitler was necessary. It he wasn’t the person that pushed the country, there easily would have been somebody else since many others were feeling the same as he was. But his book is clearly not it. I’d say the communist manifesto had more influence than hitlers book.
The marvelous adventures of Barron trump. Written around 1900. It s very creepy and is about Barron finding a time traveling worm hole in the very far north in Russia. This book I would dare to say is a warning of prophecy and how destructive the Trump family is and I always felt that Baron would grow to be very dangerous. Imagine him being as wicked as his father but with smarts. I couldn’t read the whole thing as it was to surreal. I even verified things about his character that were an exact match of his character. Sounds silly I know, but I never underestimate the things we don’t see or know.
Not a new plane.
"Extreme patriotism." Riiiiight. I'm surprised the writer(s) didn't claim Climate Change was the reason.
Nah it’s always the conservatives fault in these movies. Because Hollywood is so far left, they push a narrative.
It could be either or especially with people support the orange man
It's just a movie, a story. Why get worked up about it? It's entertainment.
Entertainment is used to influence the minds of people. @@malbourne805
This narrative helped it get made. The stench of global control is on everything.
Actually a good 🎥
They won’t let the main character out of “B” movies lol. He’s prolly happy to act anyways lol
Iam first keep the good work
Only the title i ddnt like
Yeah. It doesn't make any sense to the movie and it's not a catchy title.
@@YusukeEugeneUrameshiThe time travel happens during a blue moon so the title makes sense, but I agree not very catchy.
I don't understand, it says at the end her travels back in time are only one directional, but she does travel back to the future. I guess I am not getting the meaning. I also don't get the time paradox, of if she fixes the future, then there isn't a messed up future that allows her to go back in time to fix, unless she only fixes a different time streams future while her future is always doomed and so time travel isn't really time travel but parallel universe travel. Whatever, whole thing is just goofy, but the acting was good and the characters are good. I like the movie.
When does she travel to the future? She only ever travels backwards during the movie.
Time travel is and never will be possible. Time is an illusion. All of this is just an entertaining fantasy story.
She never travels to the future.
I'm just here to Observe.....................................
Because it's my name
....
She missed her 2024 target.
Yep.
One of those movies by Hollywood Democrats' and their "war" against Patriotism. (and the "Patriarchy")
Glad this period now looks like it's something of the past.
I'm the last good story 😂
OPPOSITE OR DIFFERENT POINT OF VIEW?
2024 trump saved us
This is BS! Forget all the woke messaging, this movie is a good example of the grandfather paradox. The whole reason for time travelling is the war in 2024 but if the war doesn't happen then the redbone won't travel back in time which means the author won't die which then causes the war in 2024 to start all over again. It's a freaking time loop!!!
So I guess she failed to prevent Project 2025 in this timeline
You misunderstood. Trump winning prevents the social justice warriors from destroying humanity.
Maybe, maybe not. I don't think she ever made it to 2025.
Woke writers.
Funny were in 2024 and non of this has happened
Funny were in 2024 and non of this has happened😅
Funny were in 2024 and non of this has happened
Its just a movie, Maybe in 2033. US Debt is now at $36T. it will be at least $54T by 2033
Funny were in 2024 and non of this has happened