Discovering Apollo's Hidden Gems | When We Were Apollo |Apollo Mission Documentaries
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
- Some names are synonymous with the Apollo Missions - Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, Jim Lovell. This documentary takes an intimate and personal look at the memories and experiences of nineteen individuals key to the Apollo Programme, unsung heroes and each every one. Working among a total workforce of over 400,000 people, they gives some insight to the true experience of working on one of history's most momentous challenges.
Unsung Heroes Of The Apollo Missions | When We Were Apollo
#apollomission #apollospacemission #nasa
Proud of my dad who worked so hard on this program from 1957-1972, in Florida and then at Redstone Aresenal.
First, this film is magnificent. I was old enough to watch, and appreciate, the entire Apollo programme. Most of my summer of '71 was sat in front of the family basement, watching Scott, Irwin and Worden went there, and back again. The mood that July was not as prinstinely hopeful as the interviewees, made up of all the support folks who made contributions that were as much fuel for the ships as the stuff in the tanks sitting at -259°F. People were distracted by Vietnam, the civil unrest that had characterised the previous years continued its relentless pace. Those of us who understood that Apollo, just 24 years after the end of the 2nd World War, lofted people into the heavens, experiencing for the first time the experience of another world's gravity well. And, we knew there were still 2 to go!
There's been 'Hidden Figures' a film that I, criminally, have not seen. But, the folks on this movie are the authentic folks whom actors played on screen screen. As such, these 'unsung heros' finally have the opera to portray their feats for our appreciation and remembrance. Yes, I liked this movie doc very much. I think I will watch it again. Give it a go!
Ah, Hidden Figures, the movie that shows C's get degrees on historical accuracy.
Thanks for this👍
I aimed for the stars, but missed and hit London and Antwerp instead.....
11:40... very good documentary, but that's St. Augustine.... not Titusville... US1 and the bridge of lions.
Our Germans beat Russian Germans to the moon.
Yeh, with far greater funding than the Soviets.
There were hundreds of thousands of people who contributed to the Apollo Project. Only a few were Germans.
I think they should send a rover like they did to mars so it can drive around and film all the things we left on the moon ,the bottom of the lunar module the flags the footprints the experiments package like the laser reflector , just so it will shut up all the flat earthers and nutjobs who say it never happened . at least we have. the ARTEMIS mission and im hoping they bring better cameras 🎥 to the moon this time !
Awesome documentary!
Not one man has left LEO in 50 years (come December 2022)..
Whats LEO?
@@jorgecruzseda7551 Low Earth Orbit
@@jorgecruzseda7551 Low earth orbit.
And you know this because youre a scientist? no? then you know shit
@Pauline Gallagher Yes. But, not a coprologist.
I watched one from Titusville at night. When it lit up it turned into day.
Thanks
The potential and kinetic energy of a 5 486 kg Apollo module at 100 000 m altitude and 11 200 m/s velocity is 5 486*(100 000*9.8 + (11 200)²/2) = 349 458 200 kJ.
The potential and kinetic energy of the same 5 486 kg Apollo module at say 15 000 m altitude and 350 m/s velocity is 5 486*(15.000*9.8 + (350)²/2) = 1 142 560 kJ.
The difference 348 315 640 kJ has been absorbed one way or another by the heat shield AVCOAT.
If such AVCOAT can absorb 418 680.0 kJ/kg before getting vaporized, it seems you need 832 kg of AVCOAT in the Apollo heat shield. To be on the safe side, you need say 2 400 kg, but then 44% of the module is AVCOAT and there is no space for any human heroes
probably why they tested on live subjects & one capsule landed in corona ( Roswell) setting off a myth the US govt used & still uses to this day = fake news
Nobody went to the moon. Earth is not a globe. Visit DITRH
@@EdwinDekker71 I just love reading jokes like yours. Makes me laugh.
You just tripled the amount needed in the last sentence 🤦♀️
@@EdwinDekker71grow up
Hat the mean (had )?
turns good people to liars
We couldn't do it today. Not with the the lazy,crybaby, I can't do this, I need a break, I can't work, I don't know how to work with others, I only think of myself, I've never been a part of a team, I need to have a social media break, I need a safe place, he looked at me funny, It's not in my job description, he harassed me by eating that taco in a improper manner, I need a week off to get my head together....blah, blah, blah...
They didnt and couldnt do it then either.
_We couldn't do it today._
Sure we could. And we did it then as well.
@@Jan_Strzelecki sorry, you've been lied to like the rest of us. Nobody went to the moon. Visit DITRH
@@EdwinDekker71 _sorry, you've been lied to_
I haven't. You, on the other hand, have. Or maybe you've just listened to a someone clueless and didn't bother to verify whether things they're saying are factually correct or not.
_Visit DITRH_
I have, unfortunately. His latest video is essentially "toilets are gross, therefore flat Earth". But I liked the video from professor Dave titled, appropriately enough, "Professor Dave Humiliates Flat Earther David Weiss".
@UCbeeEDv27MMt8RkYvgdQV3w My uncle was one of the thousands who put them there the first time. I would love to see them land again. I hope the send a unmanned lander in advance so it can show the manned lander landing. Then go back and check out one of the original landing sites. Shut the crazies up once and for all.
Not one man has left LEO in 50 years (come December 2022)..
The consilience of evidence overwhelmingly proves otherwise.
@@Jan_Strzelecki Proves what?
@@Jan_Strzelecki I don't think you read the comment before responding. He is correct.
One of the biggest lies
Whoever told you that the Moon landings are fake has lied to you, yes.
You would think that well over half a century of no one going beyond low earth orbit would be enough of a clue, but as the saying goes....there's a sucker born every minute.
The apollo missions were all STAGED folks.
Go to Apollo Detectives and see the many videos PROVING the hoax.
Here's just one example:
ua-cam.com/video/_GiF00g-pGw/v-deo.html
Yep. Nobody went to the moon, people, wake up already.
Absolutely correct. Today NASA cannot replicate the Saturn 5 rockets. NASA lost all Apollo 11 telemetry data. The rocket engines that are supposed to put man on Mars malfunction all the time. NASA don't know how to protect instruments from poisoning cosmic radiation. And other crap that was allegedly figured out in Apollo program just does not work at all. Lies, lies and NASA lies.
@@ericephemetherson3964 Yes- that Saturn 5 rocket could barely burn at half power as it barely got into low earth orbit. The astronots never rode in that time bomb.
If this shit were real, it would be way more popular.
So the Russians, who acknowledged the landings, and the Chinese who have flown over and photographed the landing sites are in on the scam and supporting ‘the lie’? Interesting train of thought David.
So would you…
Idk how people can watch this and think its real.
How profoundly iterated statement. Beautiful. Just right on the nail and Neil.
@@theonlymadmac4771 Waking up to a lie is always shocking.
No man had ever walked on the Moon. I repeat: there was no human on the Moon, ever ! ! !
No matter how many times you repeat that lie, it won't become a reality.
@@Jan_Strzelecki Do an experiment. Cut a live wire with scissors accordning to the following:
ua-cam.com/video/e_hQ4zksrfU/v-deo.html
At 5:38 the guy says that at the take off the upper part was severed from the lower part of LEM with a guillotine. Please, if you severed electrical cables, cables attached to batteries and fuel cells, fuel cables and other attachement conduits of upper and lower LEM parts, you would create unbelievable shorts in the electrical circuits and that would blow up all fuses and possibly create fire and render the take off as an impossibility. If anyone does not believe me, then take a pair of scissors and go up to any electrical cable that carries electrical current to a table lamp and cut it as fast as possible, then you will get an electrical shock and you will create a short circuit and at best blow fuses up in your home. I wonder who is that brave to do that. This is a bunch of crap. LEM never took any man to the Moon. No man was on the Moon.
@@ericephemetherson3964 _Cut a live wire with scissors accordning to the following:_
Does it say that the wires were live?
Do you perhaps imagine that an explosive guillotine was an _Apollo_ exclusive solution for severing connections?
I'd like your answers for those two questions.
@@Jan_Strzelecki Yes, they used explosives but to sever the bolts that fused the descend stage and the ascend stage. Now. you can look up the diagrams how the sharp blade was supposed to sever the stages apart. All instruments for flight were in the upper stage. And the blade could have been powered by an explosive. And where does it say that wires were NOT live?
@@ericephemetherson3964 That's not what I asked for.
Again: Do you perhaps imagine that an explosive guillotine was an _Apollo_ exclusive solution for severing connections? In other words, do you imagine that such solution has never been used before 1969?
And, as a matter of fact, it _does_ say that the wires were not live, since the very first step of the process was to fire circuit interrupters to cut off electrical signals between the stages.
You'd know that, had you done your research, but since you've neglected to do so, and thus exposed your lack of knowledge for everyone to see, I guess the only question remaining to ask is this: why should anyone take seriously anything you say about _Apollo?_
Man never set foot on the moon surface..
The consilience of evidence overwhelmingly proves otherwise.
Not that you'd know that, though.
Do you believe a magic battery inside a back pack can run a heating condenser system, cooling condenser system, water pumps, radio, telephone, lighting equipment for 71 hours.
Also a small oxygen tank that lasted 71 hours, a space suite that can withstand 230 degrees Fahrenheit and - 230 degrees below 0.
Wearing a space suite for six day
Without using the restroom..
The module did not have enough room for them to move around or take of the suite, or move around, the door swung open and the inside is exposed too the radiation and all the outside elements on the moon surface including 230 degrees Fahrenheit. And all the components stayed intact. .
This moon walk happened inside a studio..
@@ivandelabanque1806 No, I don't believe any of those things - *and neither does NASA.*
That's the main thing here, Ivan - nothing you've said above is based on what NASA is actually saying, even if they're lying.
In other words, your understanding of the _Apollo_ program is flawed (and thus worthless) _even_ if the Moon landings _are_ fake.
That's how wrong you are.
@@ivandelabanque1806
*_"Do you believe a magic battery inside a back pack can run a heating condenser system, cooling condenser system, water pumps, radio, telephone, lighting equipment for 71 hours."_*
No, I understand a a high energy density silver zinc battery capacity to 390 watt-hours. Known science is not about belief or magic.
*_"Also a small oxygen tank that lasted 71 hours"_*
There were two oxygen tanks inside the LSS backpack collectively allow for roughly 6.5 to 8 hours of extravehicular activity. By Apollo 17 the PLSS had increased O2 tank pressure from 1,020 psi (7.0 MPa) to 1,430 (9.9 MPa). They were fitted with rebreathers.
*_"a space suite that can withstand 230 degrees Fahrenheit and - 230 degrees below 0."_*
What is temperature in a vacuum? There are three ways heat can transfer and only two are possible on the Moon. The first is radiation, both directly from the Sun and from the albedo on the surface. The astronauts’ spacesuits were designed to reflect almost 90% of the light that reaches it, so very little heat would have transferred to the astronauts. The second is by conduction from the direct contact their feet had with the surface. This is also an ineffective process as regolith on the lunar surface doesn’t conduct heat well and the astronauts’ boots were insulated, slowing down conduction even further and the moon has no atmosphere. The normal kind of thermal transfer we see on Earth requires matter for the heat to transfer to. With no air, heat has no immediate way to escape a body. and so in respect of convection - the most efficient process of heat transfer - there is no medium for this to take place. All the Apollo missions to the Moon’s surface were carefully planned for lunar dawn, to ensure the surface hadn’t had time to heat up fully to its daytime temperature. The lunar day is just under 700 hours long. In addition to this, the angle of insolation ensured that the sunlight was not too strong. The temperature range from the Apollo 11touchdown to moonwalk to departure was between 250K and 280K or −23∘C to 7∘C.
*_"Without using the restroom."_*
Urine collection devices and fecal collection. Is pissing in a tube and crapping in a bag really that hard for you to comprehend?
*_"The module did not have enough room for them to move around or take of the suite, or move around"_*
Yes it did - you can easily verify the dimensions.
*_"the door swung open and the inside is exposed too the radiation and all the outside elements on the moon surface including 230 degrees Fahrenheit"_*
As explained - there is no convection on the moon and the temperature was not 230 °F. What radiation are you referring to?
*_"This moon walk happened inside a studio"_*
That's some studio that can simulate 1/6th gravity and the vacuum of space.
@@yassassin6425 NASA canceled it's 2024 trip to the moon, because they need four billion dollars and four years to develop the technology for a space suit
That can sustain life on the moon..
They never set foot on the moon,
all a bunch of fairy tales..🧞♀️🧞🧜♀️🧜♀️🧚♂️🧚♂️🧚♂️🧚♀️...
They don't even have the technology for a space suit.
The boffins say the Moon's gravity at the surface is only 17 percent that of Earth's. Using the same force of a jump on Earth, you could rise about 3 metres (10 feet) off the ground and stay in the air for about 4 seconds with a spacsuit ,when the astronauts jumped on the moon it was 2ft same as earth Thats why I believe we never went to the moon
With a life support system and bulky suit, taking risks like jumping as high as possible would be too risky to justify. Neil Armstrong himself lectured about how to imagine that if we can raise our center of gravity six times more than on earth, it is possible to clear height proportionately. However, it would be foolish to do so given the gear and mission goals.
@@1896ndt Yeah imagine jumping too high and you land on a rock and your suit gets ripped. Too risky to try
What are those things we can see with earth base telescopes that are where NASA says they landed then? How did they fake that? Your hypothesis is interesting but the overall scope is flawed with overarching generalizations and incomplete science.
Also Aldrin would punch you.
Well they could jump but remember that if on the earth the back pack weighted 100 extra pounds. Also it was stiff so it is not like jumping in gym shorts
Boy you moon landing deniers dream up more creative bullshit every day.