I'm sorry, but there's no way in the world. A single bird is going to cause complete hydraulic failure on the landing gear deployment. All of the systems are internal. They attempted a belly landing, which indicates mechanical failure.
The bird might have struck the left engine which is the one that powers the default hydraulics for landing gear. So, if the left engine was shut, it would have meant using alternative hydraulics which has to be selected manually so it is possible the pilots forgot to do so in the panic.
@@kbboy101people are saying it's inconvenient to deploy manually and it takes time. So they may have opted not to deploy manually. Something about pulling the seat back reaching around to pull a hatch and then flipping switches.... Interesting. I wonder why they'd need to do all that in a fast pace emergency situation. Most emergency switches are just big and ready and easy to turn on. They probably should change were they put the emergency manual landing gear switch.
@@HardCoverJacket A bird strike or an engine failure is an incident but not an emergency and pilots are routinely trained on how to handle it. Manually lowering the gear (in case hydraulics fail) is also a straightforward thing to do. These planes can fly perfectly well even on a single engine and there is no need to panic. The landing gear is put down at a certain height so that it can be verified if it is down and locked (3 green lights). It seems (from whatever information is available so far) that they let a certain situation escalate into an emergency and then a disaster. The plane was not correctly configured for landing and this usually (historically) happens because the crew does not prioritize and divide tasks and get fixated on one issue until it is too late.
BOING again! The birds prevented the landing gear from opening, is this a joke???? It's a BOING and that's normal. If the landing gear had been down, the plane could have at least braked and slowed down. BOING has become a real garbage disaster. But they're going to blame the birds.
@@HardCoverJacketthat's Boeing for you. The engineers have been pushed out of management roles in favor of a focus on posers and pretenders who might know about government compliance and spend their time on diversity stats and a focus on stock price rather than purely focus on building a good aircraft by people who know about such things. The people who know such things are too white and too Asian though, so they have to be silenced so diverse oppressed voices can be promoted and have their voices heard as they discuss their lived experiences lol.
Not unusual, can have many reasons: Noise Mitigation, Security, Environmental Protection, Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Control, Wind and Jet Blast Protection, Safety Barriers, Operational Efficiency, Legal and Regulatory Compliance.
@@GoodlifeInvestor yeah but seems like didnt have long enough runway ..like you said maybe they thought they slow down by then and have that dirt wall stop them.. not sure why they went this runway im sure there a longer runway or maybe this airport has short runway like we have here in san diego ca its not very long
What's up with a wall at the end of the runway? That seems a little unnecessary. A chain link fence if anything. Maybe. Plastic 50-gallon drums of water would have probably been more effective.
Airports in densely populated areas often have hard walls at the end(s) of the runways to protect nearby buildings and roadways from jetwash. Jetwash from aircraft - especially large aircraft - can flip vehicles over and cause extensive damage to nearby structures.
The runway is long enough it looks like this plane "floated" (too much speed) over most of the runway before making contact or, for some reason the pilots forgot to cut off the engines thrust.
@@heatshield Nearby airports are shared air force bases which are shorter than other airports - Kun-San (US Air force), Cheong-Ju (Korea air force) and Kwang-Ju(Korea Air force). Otherwise it had to go Incheon or Jeju island which have longer runways.
Maybe it was losing altitude to fast. It Landed going way to fast. Something beyond a bird strike happened. Some type of malfunction that caused the pilots to make the decision they did. Seems like pilot error along with mechanical error lead to the bad landing full of fuel. Still the barrier was the final nail. I know nothing about airport infrastructure but why the hell would anyone put such a concrete barrier antenna whatever thing at the end of a runway. It makes no sense. At the end of a runway there is usually empty space just in case something goes wrong. Everyone could have survived of the plane was allowed to skid. The ground would have helped slowed it down significantly.
Brid stop it the gear can be manually deployed no bird strike is going to gear from coming down. It was something more serious. Stop it with the birdstrike scenarios.
There is a thing called as “manually lowering the gear” by hand. It is done by rolling the lever for the landing gear to come down with the help of gravity. Research first, just because the engines failed doesn’t mean there is no way to lower the gear without hydraulics.
this video is nuts. have you watched it many times. its bad. I never watched planes crashes before. It’s not something I am into. what you think. I from ny. I am 28 years old. It’s ok.
It wasn't a hydraulic failure!! If you look closely, you can see the plane is not even configured for landing. It came in full speed, the pilots simply wanted to get it on the ground and forgot about the landing gear. They were obviously worried about the engine and the fire. But professional pilots are trained for this, and the panic should not have set in.
@@infernoo365 Which shouldn't bother the landing gear. Were they distracted so much by the engine failure that they forgot to lower the gear. Did they then try to go around after hitting the runway?
Crew should’ve used a manual lowering lever handle which lowers the landing gear by the help of gravity. The aircraft was still a good 7-10 minutes away from the airport, plenty of time to do that. I am not jumping on to conclusions but I am assuming that they could’ve done something.
In Poland, a few years ago, there was an incident with Lot - first the plane burned fuel, then they inflated the entire runway and landed without landing gear and there was no wall at the end of the runway. this is some absurdity going on there.... 
One note about - LOT Polish Airlines Flight 016 - it was circut-braker disabled for electrical backup gear drop, failure of hydraulics due to failed kevlar mounts. Captain is active champion of the gliders in Poland (nobody in his contract objected to his 'dangerous' sport - gliders) so the assumption is that this experience accounted a bit to his skills, too.
I really don’t understand why the crashtenders from the firebrigade were not standing bye at the landing runway? A plane without landinggear is a high risk adventure!
Sure, do you think fire brigade would help to stop the plane from combusting at the speeds of 100 kmh? I don’t think so. By the way, it was most likely way too fast for the fire brigade to be at the scene, and the pilots most likely attempted an immediate crash landing without waiting for emergency to standby.
@@hybird3255 To do belly landing (landing without gears), they have to use the whole run away and slow down the speed when belly landing. Avoiding the runaway with a wall if possible.
Safety 1st. Anything can happen during the lanfing and they too can become victims. This is real life not rehearsed screen plays. As much as it is their job to provide emergency services they too need to be safe otherwise they wouldn't be of help to the victims.
மிகவும் துயரமான சம்பவம் பார்க்கவே பயங்கரமாக உள்ளது இறந்தவர்களின் உறவினர்களுக்கு எனது ஆழ்ந்த இரங்கலை தெரிவித்துக்கொள்கிறேன் இறந்தவர்கள் அனைவர்களுடைய ஆன்மாவும் சாந்தியடைய எல்லாம்வல்ல இறைவனை வேண்டுகிறேன்.
Why are my comments deleted, it's not even a political topic as the crash in Kazakhstan. I simply observed that the video indicates that the plane landed long, any pilots could tell you that.
1. It’s possible. A blown up engine from the bird strike could’ve hit the hydraulics system. De-pressurizing the system. When you de-pressurize something that needs pressure to power another thing what happens? The thing that needs pressure to power doesn’t have pressure anymore. 2. Concrete block was most likely for noise reduction for the beach nearby or to reduce building costs.
There obviously was some hydraulic failure for sure or something that caused the gear not deploy, and judging by the speed they probably landed without flaps also
I pray for the lost souls! I pray for the bereaved family! Amidst this Delicate and sensitive situation, i wish to appreciate the pilot for excellent workmanship in the attempt of landing the malfunctioning aircraft: Softest belly landing, maintaining perfect balance of the aircraft ensuring that the engine doesn't doesn't catch the ground which would have cartwheeled the entire plane. The pilot must be a braveheart to hold this composure till the end despite seeing death approaching in front of the eyes. Those surviving owe gratitude to the pilot. Those who sadly didn't make it, I'll put it as they ran out of place. Sorry that those effected will have to live with this for the rest of their lives.
I’m no expert, but can someone explain why the plane was moving at such a high speed at the end of the runway? Could it be that the engines somehow failed to reduce power?
If pilots forgets also to open landing gear there should be any signal or alarm to alert pilots to opened landing gear before atleast 8 to 10 km before landing like this system have to make to avoid like this disasters
You got to get the wheels down if you want to land. They teach that on the first day of flight school. Why is there a brick wall at the end of the runway? RIP
Massive negligence at play on multiple parts here. Attempting this landing was virtually guaranteed death for everyone onboard and you didn’t need a calculator to figure it out. I also don’t buy the “bird strike” excuse they’re running with, smells like early cover up. Absolutely bizarre.
In terms of civil.aircraft technology and safety there was very little progress in the last 50 years. When i flew with a Boeing 747 in 1970 and when i fly today very few details really changed. Same goes for airports, in terms of safety its almost same as in the last five decades.
Nope, per CNN 179 deaths and 2 crews survived because they both were in the tail section. The tail section was the only piece that was not totally destroyed.
Our deepest sympathy!! Boundry wall....disaster...can't we think....end of runaway we can use sand ending...water ending...muddy ending...like something's as a alternative....
@@alexrebmann1253the hydrolics failed so they couldnt deploy the landing gear. this resulted in them doing a belly landing, but the plane couldnt stop in time, so it crashed into the runways wall.
why putting that stupid wall at the end ?! can they not put kinda many nets to slow down the impact ?! , they could have all surivived if there was not those pals and wall !! RIP for all the Souls Lost 😢
@@bills6093 maybe they didn't deploy also the flaps, which can explain why they were not able to stop, and explain the fast landing Could be related to (again) a hydraulic failure.
It exploded because it hit something why do they design wall arround the peirimeter. Why do they not design for brake failure or no langing gear. It landed intact but explodex cause it hit something.
@@AppuSun it wasnt a wall, it was a localizer antenna (ILS) and its large concrete construction they crashed into. They were landing in opposite direction. I've read what pilots and former pilots have to say and it was mostly survivable accident. If they hit the perimeter wall, there could be a higher chance of survival. Find the airport on Google maps, there are some fields around, road and few buildings in a distance. Airports are usually built on the outskirts of cities, away from highly populsted areas because of noise.
@@AppuSunit wasnt a wall, it was a localizer antenna (ILS) and its concrete construction. They were landing in opposite direction. If they hit the perimeter wall there would be a higher chance of survival, as some pilots and former pilots said it was a mostly survivable accident. Look at the airport on Google maps, there are some fields around, road and few buildings in a distance. Airports are usually built on the outskirts of cities and towns because of noise.
I've never heard of a bird strike damaging the landing gear of any aircraft. I think after seeing that the landing gear was still up on this aircraft in the air and on the ground that the pilots didn't lower the landing gear at all, I would further say that the landing took the pilots by surprise and that they (the Pilots) simply missmanaged the whole landing procedure. I'm truly sad for the victims of this accident.
Its been long ago that birds can cause airplaine crash..i have read it in readers digest book since 1980's..birds can be stock in engine and it cause failure an airplane..
So… if you explode something close to a pipe what happens? The pipe next to it probably also explodes. The hydraulic system is a system of pipes that are PRESSURIZED. A leak or a break of the system will de pressurize the entire system. The landing gear relies on PRESSURIZED fluid to activate, a de-pressurized fluid would not work. Simple as that. This leads to the suspicion of a bird strike causing the engine to explode, then the hydraulic system leaking and de pressurizing, then the landing gears not activating then the plane crashing and combusting.
Birds getting a lot of unwarranted blame this week.
😂
I'm sorry, but there's no way in the world. A single bird is going to cause complete hydraulic failure on the landing gear deployment. All of the systems are internal. They attempted a belly landing, which indicates mechanical failure.
The bird might have struck the left engine which is the one that powers the default hydraulics for landing gear. So, if the left engine was shut, it would have meant using alternative hydraulics which has to be selected manually so it is possible the pilots forgot to do so in the panic.
@@kbboy101people are saying it's inconvenient to deploy manually and it takes time. So they may have opted not to deploy manually. Something about pulling the seat back reaching around to pull a hatch and then flipping switches.... Interesting. I wonder why they'd need to do all that in a fast pace emergency situation. Most emergency switches are just big and ready and easy to turn on. They probably should change were they put the emergency manual landing gear switch.
@@HardCoverJacket A bird strike or an engine failure is an incident but not an emergency and pilots are routinely trained on how to handle it. Manually lowering the gear (in case hydraulics fail) is also a straightforward thing to do. These planes can fly perfectly well even on a single engine and there is no need to panic.
The landing gear is put down at a certain height so that it can be verified if it is down and locked (3 green lights).
It seems (from whatever information is available so far) that they let a certain situation escalate into an emergency and then a disaster.
The plane was not correctly configured for landing and this usually (historically) happens because the crew does not prioritize and divide tasks and get fixated on one issue until it is too late.
BOING again! The birds prevented the landing gear from opening, is this a joke???? It's a BOING and that's normal. If the landing gear had been down, the plane could have at least braked and slowed down. BOING has become a real garbage disaster. But they're going to blame the birds.
@@HardCoverJacketthat's Boeing for you. The engineers have been pushed out of management roles in favor of a focus on posers and pretenders who might know about government compliance and spend their time on diversity stats and a focus on stock price rather than purely focus on building a good aircraft by people who know about such things. The people who know such things are too white and too Asian though, so they have to be silenced so diverse oppressed voices can be promoted and have their voices heard as they discuss their lived experiences lol.
Prayers for those who perished in the accidents.
Only 2 survivors
One male flight attendant
And one female flight attendant 😢
They were both in the tail area of the plane. The tail was the only piece that retained some of its shape and for the rest were exploded into debris.
A wall at the end of the runway? Shocking..
Not unusual, can have many reasons: Noise Mitigation, Security, Environmental Protection, Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Control, Wind and Jet Blast Protection, Safety Barriers, Operational Efficiency, Legal and Regulatory Compliance.
За стеной может быть населённый пункт. Тогда жертв было бы ещё больше
maybe they though the wall will stop the plane from going onto the streets
It's a 9200-foot / 2800m runway. That should have been more than enough to stop, even with gear up.
@@GoodlifeInvestor yeah but seems like didnt have long enough runway ..like you said maybe they thought they slow down by then and have that dirt wall stop them.. not sure why they went this runway im sure there a longer runway or maybe this airport has short runway like we have here in san diego ca its not very long
What's up with a wall at the end of the runway? That seems a little unnecessary. A chain link fence if anything. Maybe. Plastic 50-gallon drums of water would have probably been more effective.
Airports in densely populated areas often have hard walls at the end(s) of the runways to protect nearby buildings and roadways from jetwash. Jetwash from aircraft - especially large aircraft - can flip vehicles over and cause extensive damage to nearby structures.
@@lstein89I checked Google maps and it’s open fields beyond the cement barrier. Nothing to protect there…
Rip to the passengers and Crew that did not make it
Why can't there be longer runway as a safety
Runway is long, but it went off runway
потому что человеческая жизнь ничто, а пара километров земли это ограниченный ресурс.
@@efan4please tell that to putt-pin
The runway is long enough it looks like this plane "floated" (too much speed) over most of the runway before making contact or, for some reason the pilots forgot to cut off the engines thrust.
@@iorr98they didnt float....they scraped the engines. Floating is if you're too fast before touchdown and the ground effect prolongs your glide
Stop with the bird issue. It’s nonsense. A plane of millions of dollars can’t ended up like this just for a bird.
Fr they are saying a bird caused the gear to not go down and slammed into a wall
Yes it’s at least 70 million dollars
One thing leads to another thing
Why not divert to an airport without a wall at the end of the runway when you know you’re not going to be able to break?
Good question. I’m looking into fuel requirements to achieve that.
I can’t imagine they thought this would work.
@@heatshield Nearby airports are shared air force bases which are shorter than other airports - Kun-San (US Air force), Cheong-Ju (Korea air force) and Kwang-Ju(Korea Air force). Otherwise it had to go Incheon or Jeju island which have longer runways.
Where is there a longer runway than the 9200 foot one they went off of though?
Maybe it was losing altitude to fast. It Landed going way to fast. Something beyond a bird strike happened. Some type of malfunction that caused the pilots to make the decision they did. Seems like pilot error along with mechanical error lead to the bad landing full of fuel. Still the barrier was the final nail. I know nothing about airport infrastructure but why the hell would anyone put such a concrete barrier antenna whatever thing at the end of a runway. It makes no sense. At the end of a runway there is usually empty space just in case something goes wrong. Everyone could have survived of the plane was allowed to skid. The ground would have helped slowed it down significantly.
Brid stop it the gear can be manually deployed no bird strike is going to gear from coming down. It was something more serious. Stop it with the birdstrike scenarios.
spoken like someone with no common sense.....the video I saw clearly shows a bird strike directly into the right engine.
@@HeywoodChablome Just say no to drugs.
There is a thing called as “manually lowering the gear” by hand. It is done by rolling the lever for the landing gear to come down with the help of gravity. Research first, just because the engines failed doesn’t mean there is no way to lower the gear without hydraulics.
this video is nuts. have you watched it many times. its bad. I never watched planes crashes before. It’s not something I am into. what you think. I from ny. I am 28 years old. It’s ok.
It wasn't a hydraulic failure!! If you look closely, you can see the plane is not even configured for landing. It came in full speed, the pilots simply wanted to get it on the ground and forgot about the landing gear. They were obviously worried about the engine and the fire. But professional pilots are trained for this, and the panic should not have set in.
Those who passed my condolences to their families. Prayers sent .
You say 28 people they said there was 179 people died not 28 2 survived in the tail
this was from early time not from later developed situations. see the time it was published. you came to watch after 16-17 hours
@@hadesolympus6069yeah
Looks like it had no landing gear deployed 0:14 What happen to that landing gear?
It probably didn't get lowered
bird hit the plane before landing
@@infernoo365 Which shouldn't bother the landing gear. Were they distracted so much by the engine failure that they forgot to lower the gear. Did they then try to go around after hitting the runway?
Crew should’ve used a manual lowering lever handle which lowers the landing gear by the help of gravity. The aircraft was still a good 7-10 minutes away from the airport, plenty of time to do that. I am not jumping on to conclusions but I am assuming that they could’ve done something.
Poor birds, getting all the blame
!!!!! 🤣🫵
In Poland, a few years ago, there was an incident with Lot - first the plane burned fuel, then they inflated the entire runway and landed without landing gear and there was no wall at the end of the runway. this is some absurdity going on there....

One note about - LOT Polish Airlines Flight 016 - it was circut-braker disabled for electrical backup gear drop, failure of hydraulics due to failed kevlar mounts. Captain is active champion of the gliders in Poland (nobody in his contract objected to his 'dangerous' sport - gliders) so the assumption is that this experience accounted a bit to his skills, too.
I really don’t understand why the crashtenders from the firebrigade were not standing bye at the landing runway? A plane without landinggear is a high risk adventure!
Sure, do you think fire brigade would help to stop the plane from combusting at the speeds of 100 kmh? I don’t think so. By the way, it was most likely way too fast for the fire brigade to be at the scene, and the pilots most likely attempted an immediate crash landing without waiting for emergency to standby.
@@hybird3255 To do belly landing (landing without gears), they have to use the whole run away and slow down the speed when belly landing. Avoiding the runaway with a wall if possible.
Safety 1st. Anything can happen during the lanfing and they too can become victims. This is real life not rehearsed screen plays. As much as it is their job to provide emergency services they too need to be safe otherwise they wouldn't be of help to the victims.
They keep blaming it on the birds
Birds causing such terrible accidents....what era are we still living in 😢
Why am I not seeing any landing gear deployed?
Шасси были повреждены птицами
If am not wrong, the journalist was telling it was hydraulic system failure for landing gear to be deployed.
They explain in the first minute. "belly landing" "hydraulic failure"
A 737 ofc bruh that trash company at it again
@ ok comrade 🫡
Too fast of an approach…
மிகவும் துயரமான சம்பவம் பார்க்கவே பயங்கரமாக உள்ளது இறந்தவர்களின் உறவினர்களுக்கு எனது ஆழ்ந்த இரங்கலை தெரிவித்துக்கொள்கிறேன் இறந்தவர்கள் அனைவர்களுடைய ஆன்மாவும் சாந்தியடைய எல்லாம்வல்ல இறைவனை வேண்டுகிறேன்.
Guys, no need to wonder. It's a Boeing plane. Remember those whistleblowers who died under mysterious circumstances after revealing Boeing's problems?
Planes 15 years old…. Is not a factory defect
Idiots KEEP blaming Boeing like they know everything and call the experts nerd. Idiocracy is REAL
I don't see any points of blaming Boeing
The B737 NG isn't in production anymore
@fayyadguissida idiots will keep blaming and i'm getting tired of it
For real
Everyone except 2 lost their lives. 181 people were on board.
Why the concrete barrier? they could have just kept sliding....
Even if the landing gear deployed--the runway is too short. The braking flaps didn't seem to help at all.
Why is the runway so short and there is a wall in front? This design is very unreasonable
Was the plane observed from the tower? The landing should have been canceled until the runway was wet.
NDTV gets on a reporter who know absolutely nothing about aircraft or the situation. The stupid leading the blind.
Why are my comments deleted, it's not even a political topic as the crash in Kazakhstan. I simply observed that the video indicates that the plane landed long, any pilots could tell you that.
It's because you and myself live in a country where we are censored like Canada 🇨🇦 and China 🇨🇳
They hacked the plane within hours after I took a picture of my receipt how disgusting
The genius who constructed the wall should be held responsible
It was a Boeing plane...
Not than boeing is directly responsible, but as a passenger why would I ever fly in a boeing jet?
How do you expect to somehow fly airbus 24/7. Expired rat, decomposed nincompoop, idiotic user
Why wasn't the airport prepared for an emergency landing? Where's the fluid on the tarmac?
If the gear is not extended, the plane could've taken off again to avert crash
I think they tried to take off again after hitting the runway, then tried to abort too late.
Stop saying “veer”. Veer means “deviating from a straight line”.
What a tragedy... may the victims rest in peace
The plane wasnt shot was it?
It is impossible that a bird strike could have caused this, the wheels could not deploy and why was there a concrete block at the end of the runway?
1. It’s possible. A blown up engine from the bird strike could’ve hit the hydraulics system. De-pressurizing the system. When you de-pressurize something that needs pressure to power another thing what happens? The thing that needs pressure to power doesn’t have pressure anymore.
2. Concrete block was most likely for noise reduction for the beach nearby or to reduce building costs.
отличная идея построить стену в аэропорту.
Why is there a wall at the end of the runway?
There obviously was some hydraulic failure for sure or something that caused the gear not deploy, and judging by the speed they probably landed without flaps also
What were the nationalities of the passengers?
I pray for the lost souls! I pray for the bereaved family!
Amidst this Delicate and sensitive situation, i wish to appreciate the pilot for excellent workmanship in the attempt of landing the malfunctioning aircraft: Softest belly landing, maintaining perfect balance of the aircraft ensuring that the engine doesn't doesn't catch the ground which would have cartwheeled the entire plane. The pilot must be a braveheart to hold this composure till the end despite seeing death approaching in front of the eyes. Those surviving owe gratitude to the pilot. Those who sadly didn't make it, I'll put it as they ran out of place. Sorry that those effected will have to live with this for the rest of their lives.
One of those instances where flying couch and the cheap seats saved some lives! Thoughts and prayers for the fallen.
I’m no expert, but can someone explain why the plane was moving at such a high speed at the end of the runway? Could it be that the engines somehow failed to reduce power?
As usual, bird will get the blame on this crash.. poor innocent bird
Why 28????
You see the pilot trying to pull up
No matter the whys, this is sad.
179 of 181 died…
If pilots forgets also to open landing gear there should be any signal or alarm to alert pilots to opened landing gear before atleast 8 to 10 km before landing like this system have to make to avoid like this disasters
Why on earth did they build a wall at the end of a runway ????
The plane ran out of runway
You got to get the wheels down if you want to land. They teach that on the first day of flight school. Why is there a brick wall at the end of the runway? RIP
I believe they couldn’t lower the gear Sherlock
Trying to save a million dollar company by blaming it on birds eh😢
Massive negligence at play on multiple parts here. Attempting this landing was virtually guaranteed death for everyone onboard and you didn’t need a calculator to figure it out. I also don’t buy the “bird strike” excuse they’re running with, smells like early cover up. Absolutely bizarre.
Looks like they forgot to lower the gear, and then tried to go around after striking the runway, and then decided to abort too late.
@@bills6093😱
Yes i also not heard with bird hits its effect to landing gear may be its pilots fault or something ?
Did they forget to lower landing gear?
Maybe they didn't forget and got a landing gear issue
Like the 767 polish airlines from 2011
Anyway we can just wait the investigation
In terms of civil.aircraft technology and safety there was very little progress in the last 50 years.
When i flew with a Boeing 747 in 1970 and when i fly today very few details really changed.
Same goes for airports, in terms of safety its almost same as in the last five decades.
Cynical, condecending reporter!!!!!!!
It's so sad 😢
rip
"Look's" what 😢
How tf are they claim8ng 28 dead??? There were 181 ppl on board!!
Nope, per CNN 179 deaths and 2 crews survived because they both were in the tail section. The tail section was the only piece that was not totally destroyed.
2 people survived
Need sand path or water pool for end of the runway
On board People are flying plain blasting very sad 😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
Wall?
I'm only flying if I sit in the rearmost seat...
May Their Soul rest In Peace 🕊️🕊️🕊️😢😢😢
Remove tha wall
Тогда самолёт может снести дома за стеной
The 2nd bird to be blamed.
December Month 😭😭😭
1:10 737 are cursed. They should be withdrawn
How do you expect them to somehow be cursed🙏
Our deepest sympathy!!
Boundry wall....disaster...can't we think....end of runaway we can use sand ending...water ending...muddy ending...like something's as a alternative....
737 shouldve gotten banned
Tell us the cause of crash
Armchair aviation specialists 😂. Normal 737 is one of the safest aircraft in history of aviation
@@loneranterismyup
Most are bots or ccp
@@alexrebmann1253the hydrolics failed so they couldnt deploy the landing gear. this resulted in them doing a belly landing, but the plane couldnt stop in time, so it crashed into the runways wall.
Idiots KEEP blaming Boeing like they know everything and call the experts nerd. Idiocracy is REAL
Same thing has happened in Canada... Another incident.
Lord mercy😢
pilots forgot to deploy landing gear, then try to fly around after landing....
why putting that stupid wall at the end ?! can they not put kinda many nets to slow down the impact ?! , they could have all surivived if there was not those pals and wall !! RIP for all the Souls Lost 😢
Sorry but it looks like the Pilots just forgot to lower the Landing Gear.......
I know it sounds unbelievable..... But......?!
It's like they tried to take off again after hitting the runway, then tried to abort.
Wait the investigation
They probably got Hydraulic issues, which maybe explain why they weren't able to lower the landing gear
@fayyadguissida That doesn't explain why they could not stop on a runway that was plenty long enough for a belly landing.
@@bills6093 maybe they didn't deploy also the flaps, which can explain why they were not able to stop, and explain the fast landing
Could be related to (again) a hydraulic failure.
@fayyadguissida I think they tried to take off again after contacting the runway.
Danger of losing
Ban Boeing Airplanes
Its 80+ death now
Plane groundil
Touch cheythal,
Break aply cheyyille?
Hw....Why went into a wall???
Bukan saya nah. Bukan jg Moscow.
Hmm they say 120 killed ang 2 survivor
It exploded because it hit something why do they design wall arround the peirimeter. Why do they not design for brake failure or no langing gear. It landed intact but explodex cause it hit something.
Use your brain.. if there is no wall the plane would have skid into nearby street and the accident may become more serious killing people outside
@@AppuSun it wasnt a wall, it was a localizer antenna (ILS) and its large concrete construction they crashed into. They were landing in opposite direction. I've read what pilots and former pilots have to say and it was mostly survivable accident. If they hit the perimeter wall, there could be a higher chance of survival. Find the airport on Google maps, there are some fields around, road and few buildings in a distance. Airports are usually built on the outskirts of cities, away from highly populsted areas because of noise.
@@AppuSunit wasnt a wall, it was a localizer antenna (ILS) and its concrete construction. They were landing in opposite direction. If they hit the perimeter wall there would be a higher chance of survival, as some pilots and former pilots said it was a mostly survivable accident. Look at the airport on Google maps, there are some fields around, road and few buildings in a distance. Airports are usually built on the outskirts of cities and towns because of noise.
If the pilots knew they had landing gear problems, why did they not ask emergency services to foam the runway??
It's actually better not to. Foam decreases the friction and increases the stopping distance.
You don't want a slippery runway especially belly landing.
I've never heard of a bird strike damaging the landing gear of any aircraft. I think after seeing that the landing gear was still up on this aircraft in the air and on the ground that the pilots didn't lower the landing gear at all, I would further say that the landing took the pilots by surprise and that they (the Pilots) simply missmanaged the whole landing procedure. I'm truly sad for the victims of this accident.
Its been long ago that birds can cause airplaine crash..i have read it in readers digest book since 1980's..birds can be stock in engine and it cause failure an airplane..
@@AntonetteEduarte-wc3xv Totally agree with you but not the landing gear.
So… if you explode something close to a pipe what happens? The pipe next to it probably also explodes. The hydraulic system is a system of pipes that are PRESSURIZED. A leak or a break of the system will de pressurize the entire system. The landing gear relies on PRESSURIZED fluid to activate, a de-pressurized fluid would not work. Simple as that. This leads to the suspicion of a bird strike causing the engine to explode, then the hydraulic system leaking and de pressurizing, then the landing gears not activating then the plane crashing and combusting.
Damn 💔
That wall
Thet y I hate airplane😢
Deepest condolences 🙏🙏🙏
I guess somebody who discovered cancer vaccine was on that plane😅
the crashed airplane is another Boeing! And many Boeing parts are made in India nowadays
It’s a Boeing plane
Omm Shanti 😢🥺🥺
Boeing shd be blamed 🤬😠😡