The CATL Finally Released it's NEW SOLID STATE Batteries! You won't believe!

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 46

  • @zoltangaal1842
    @zoltangaal1842 12 днів тому +28

    The narrator talks too much. He repeats himself several times.

  • @EdwardTilley
    @EdwardTilley 12 днів тому +25

    If its a real product, where are the real test results?

    • @dan143210
      @dan143210 10 днів тому

      Like any Chinese thing….lies and propaganda

  • @Alrukitaf
    @Alrukitaf 12 днів тому

    Imagine what a great thing this would be in the “not-too-distant” future.

  • @kevinbates3575
    @kevinbates3575 6 днів тому

    There is much more to a vehicle than the fuel or battery type. Quit bashing Toyota in these videos, it's disrespectful

  • @dm285
    @dm285 12 днів тому

    Believe me Ford and Stellantis(Dodge)..... will be long gone before Toyota is dethroned as the most reliable and efficient vehicle in the US.
    Toyota has made a pact with BYD(top Chinese manufacturer), and it's going to start using their hybrid EV technology to make their Toyota vehicles even more popular in the US.

  • @billcollins6894
    @billcollins6894 11 днів тому

    Cool, but Toyota will be fine. No technology can be prevented from being copied or improved.

  • @yousmehratube
    @yousmehratube 9 днів тому

    4:30 4+ minutes and still not to the point. AI at work?

  • @fpxy00
    @fpxy00 11 днів тому

    Huge waist of money. ICE powering electromotors is the way to go.
    Best battery is good old gasoline.

  • @kamokere
    @kamokere 12 днів тому +4

    bla bla bla

  • @vijaybhasker9478
    @vijaybhasker9478 12 днів тому

    Past 2 to 3 years, no one here Ev and AI technology, it's now, like batteries be change.

  • @crcc23
    @crcc23 11 днів тому +1

    The video is good and interesting. But the wtf with the thumbnail. Nothing to do with toyota.

    • @millanferende6723
      @millanferende6723 11 днів тому

      Don't encourage it (please). This is just a "AI content pump out machine."
      This is why the thumbnail is irrelevant. The uploader doesn't care about any "content" and probably has 5-10 different accounts where he is pumping this unrefined AI-🗑 to. Please don't encourage stuff like this.

    • @millanferende6723
      @millanferende6723 11 днів тому

      Like even look at his uploads. A video or 3 videos every single DAY. That is just an AI conveyor-belt🗑.
      Oh, you think he at least finds the images? Wrong! I've seen AI show image of "laser cutter", as it is clearly talking about "laser scanner." Hot, unrefined AI-🗑 that is infesting the internet. (Unfortunately)

  • @markgutierez9922
    @markgutierez9922 10 днів тому

    Oh so this is the battery in the OnePlus 13

  • @nikolausfrick5572
    @nikolausfrick5572 9 днів тому +1

    ChatGPT sagt dazu: CATL hat kürzlich angekündigt, die Produktion von Festkörperbatterien mit einer Energiedichte von 500 Wh/kg bis 2027 in kleinen Stückzahlen zu starten. Aktuell sind jedoch keine Festkörperbatterien mit 400 Wh/kg auf dem Markt erhältlich. Der derzeitige Entwicklungsstand wird auf einer Skala von 1 bis 9 bei 4 eingeordnet, mit dem Ziel, bis 2027 eine Reifestufe von 7 bis 8 zu erreichen. Derzeit bietet CATL Batteriezellen mit einer Energiedichte von bis zu 330 Wh/kg an.
    CATL

  • @M8KES
    @M8KES 11 днів тому

    It's not groundbreaking and in detail not worth to make waves.

  • @pablofernandezperez9442
    @pablofernandezperez9442 11 днів тому

    Loorks like a CATL´s add instead of a serious video

  • @Bemx2k
    @Bemx2k 11 днів тому +1

    1kg of petrol got energy about 5000 Wh/kg , best near future ( 4-5 years ) solid state will have energy density 500Wh/kg :) huge gap between petrol and batteries

    • @najbor100
      @najbor100 11 днів тому

      And how much of that petrol potentional energy is converted to usefull work, max. 25%, lol.

    • @Bemx2k
      @Bemx2k 11 днів тому

      @@najbor100 It has been calculated with petrol engine power efficiency , normally there is about 10 000 Wh/kg of petrol

    • @steamcarephuket707
      @steamcarephuket707 11 днів тому

      indeed, but pls consider that a kg of gasoline is only used once ....... and much of that energy does not go into kinetic energy to move the car, but into heat (which needs a separate system to remove it from the engine)

  • @thatguybun
    @thatguybun 11 днів тому +1

    i think this is ai generated garbage

  • @stephen6631
    @stephen6631 12 годин тому

    It doesn’t look released

  • @tadeuszzasepa3285
    @tadeuszzasepa3285 11 днів тому

    It's a pitty that you can't see the thumb down counter any more:(

    • @millanferende6723
      @millanferende6723 11 днів тому

      It's 50/50. You can download an extension. (thankfully)

  • @cesarfurlanetto4848
    @cesarfurlanetto4848 12 днів тому

    Humhum, eu acredito.

  • @Gb80788
    @Gb80788 11 днів тому

    Unsubscribing

  • @RickRoseIsAwesome
    @RickRoseIsAwesome 7 днів тому

    This creator sucks

  • @DavyRo
    @DavyRo 12 днів тому +1

    Much easier to just go to a hydrogen economy, before anyone says it's storage is the problem. Gasoline/petrol is highly inflamable & a little R&D can easily iron out any problems. In fact the only reason we aren't in an hydrogen economy right now. Is because the powers that be know. We'll easily figure out how to produce our own hydrogen from water sources.

    • @eckehardsiegmann9341
      @eckehardsiegmann9341 12 днів тому +2

      U need about 3 to 4 times more clean energy´/electricity to produce H2 and drive with it. Despite this, the infrastructure is not here and extremely expensive to build

    • @MrBabek
      @MrBabek 12 днів тому

      Like the infrastructure for all electric is for free. Its causing massive problems and needs billions and billions to be upgraded. Sure problems and efficiency have to improve for hydrogen. But the industry first wants to milk electric, like always

    • @nfzeta128
      @nfzeta128 12 днів тому +2

      This is wrong on so many levels.

    • @autobootpiloot
      @autobootpiloot 11 днів тому +4

      Very few things are as difficult to implement economically as hydrogen. Hydrogen is the 2020 version of the nuclear dream 60 years ago. The reason we don't have nuclear powered fridges and watches is not only because it's difficult to make. It's mostly because it would be too expensive and too dangerous in the real world with no way of fixing those issues. Hydrogen is the same, for different reasons but still too expensive and dangerous.

    • @najbor100
      @najbor100 11 днів тому

      @@eckehardsiegmann9341 This