I’m not a math expert so correct me if I’m wrong but I’m seeing a lot more of problems with your explanations, hope this helps you improve. My Constructive Criticism: BrightStorm has a better faster clearer explanation than this. The problem is, this focuses on examples too much you forget to elaborate to us. We don’t even know where we are in the topic anymore as it keeps going. Speak clearly, like your actually talking to a person about how it works and using words where he can understand and not just read some paragraph you found on Wikipedia or some else. Lessen the amount of examples. Tell us how you came up with an answer with the examples and how you did it, I mean I can’t understand you at example 2 when you go like “oh this number goes Ace” something something and you didn’t tell us how you calculated it, it’s just answering a bunch of problems. 3rd criticism is that you don’t give context. Again with the examples, you didn’t give us a clue on what the examples are even for. If your trying to use the examples for showing us how inductive reasoning works “stating a fact with no logical proof but with just the knowledge you know or even the pattern you see to conclude the answer” and at least tell us like “This is how you answer different other mathematical problems using inductive reasoning” or some else closer to that. Look if you have troubles explaining and keep going all over the place then just follow my explaining structure formula 1. Introduction or definition 2. Explanation of how it works 3. Example 4. Explanation of how came up with the answer for the example 5. Conclusion. Example, if I would make this video, it would be like: “Inductive reasoning is stating a fact or a conclusion by not using logical proof but with knowledge you have, context or the pattern you see, unlike Deductive reasoning which is the opposite of what I just said about inductive reasoning. Here’s an example of concluding by using inductive reasoning. *Shows illustration: 2,4,6,8,10,__,* Now what comes after 10? By using inductive reasoning we conclude it’s 12. Why? Because the pattern your seeing here is that the numbers are being counted by 2’s and you all know how to count by 2’s right? So what comes after 10 is 12 so that’s inductive reasoning, we just conclude by knowing the pattern but not logically proving it. If you use deductive reasoning, you know that counting by 2’s is just starting with two then add another 2 then count like that. Well add another 2 on 10 it’s now 12. How about let’s solve a multiplication problem by inductive reasoning. 2 x 5 is equals what? 10! How? I counted by 2’s and since that it’s x 5 then I counted up to 5 and the 5 in 2’s is 10. (2,4,6,8,10). So what if I solved it by reasoning ^ Deductively, well the reason why it’s ten deductively, is because here is how multiplication works: 2 x 5 =? 2 is the one being multiplied while 5 is the one that tells you answerer how many times should you mulitply the 2. Since that it’s 5, I add a two then add a second then third then fourth until finally fifth which leads me to an answer called 10. Or you could do it the other way around have the 5 be multiplied by the two or switch the two together (5x2) and still get the same answer, 10! Because when 5 is multiplied twice, it’s a 10 too. This is the case for every problem of whole numbers being multiplied. So in conclusion, inductive reasoning is just concluding an answer or stating a fact with no logical evidence but through patterns and context you have, all while deductive is using logical reasons to conclude an answer. Thank for watching, this has been ShervyLapiz goodbye” see what I did there? That would work. I’m trying to hate, I’m opening your mind maybe, I’m trying right all the time I’m just seeing problems with your explanations that I think it needs improvement. Look criticism is not for hating, it’s for improving. There is difference between comments like “YOU SHOULD COMMIT DIE, YOUR VIDEOS SUCKS” to more longer and more detailed like “Good good, but kinda needs this...........” ok got me? Go cowboy!
6 x 8 = 7 x 9 - 15
8 x 10 = 9 x 11 - 19
What is the next equation in the sequence? Pls reply, cause I got an answer but idk if I'm right
Observations, experiment, generalization are the levels of inductive reasoning...
Pls reply sir
I’m not a math expert so correct me if I’m wrong but I’m seeing a lot more of problems with your explanations, hope this helps you improve.
My Constructive Criticism:
BrightStorm has a better faster clearer explanation than this. The problem is, this focuses on examples too much you forget to elaborate to us. We don’t even know where we are in the topic anymore as it keeps going. Speak clearly, like your actually talking to a person about how it works and using words where he can understand and not just read some paragraph you found on Wikipedia or some else. Lessen the amount of examples. Tell us how you came up with an answer with the examples and how you did it, I mean I can’t understand you at example 2 when you go like “oh this number goes Ace” something something and you didn’t tell us how you calculated it, it’s just answering a bunch of problems. 3rd criticism is that you don’t give context. Again with the examples, you didn’t give us a clue on what the examples are even for. If your trying to use the examples for showing us how inductive reasoning works “stating a fact with no logical proof but with just the knowledge you know or even the pattern you see to conclude the answer” and at least tell us like “This is how you answer different other mathematical problems using inductive reasoning” or some else closer to that. Look if you have troubles explaining and keep going all over the place then just follow my explaining structure formula
1. Introduction or definition
2. Explanation of how it works
3. Example
4. Explanation of how came up with the answer for the example
5. Conclusion.
Example, if I would make this video, it would be like:
“Inductive reasoning is stating a fact or a conclusion by not using logical proof but with knowledge you have, context or the pattern you see, unlike Deductive reasoning which is the opposite of what I just said about inductive reasoning. Here’s an example of concluding by using inductive reasoning. *Shows illustration: 2,4,6,8,10,__,* Now what comes after 10? By using inductive reasoning we conclude it’s 12. Why? Because the pattern your seeing here is that the numbers are being counted by 2’s and you all know how to count by 2’s right? So what comes after 10 is 12 so that’s inductive reasoning, we just conclude by knowing the pattern but not logically proving it. If you use deductive reasoning, you know that counting by 2’s is just starting with two then add another 2 then count like that. Well add another 2 on 10 it’s now 12. How about let’s solve a multiplication problem by inductive reasoning. 2 x 5 is equals what? 10! How? I counted by 2’s and since that it’s x 5 then I counted up to 5 and the 5 in 2’s is 10. (2,4,6,8,10). So what if I solved it by reasoning
^
Deductively, well the reason why it’s ten deductively, is because here is how multiplication works: 2 x 5 =? 2 is the one being multiplied while 5 is the one that tells you answerer how many times should you mulitply the 2. Since that it’s 5, I add a two then add a second then third then fourth until finally fifth which leads me to an answer called 10. Or you could do it the other way around have the 5 be multiplied by the two or switch the two together (5x2) and still get the same answer, 10! Because when 5 is multiplied twice, it’s a 10 too. This is the case for every problem of whole numbers being multiplied. So in conclusion, inductive reasoning is just concluding an answer or stating a fact with no logical evidence but through patterns and context you have, all while deductive is using logical reasons to conclude an answer. Thank for watching, this has been ShervyLapiz goodbye” see what I did there? That would work. I’m trying to hate, I’m opening your mind maybe, I’m trying right all the time I’m just seeing problems with your explanations that I think it needs improvement. Look criticism is not for hating, it’s for improving. There is difference between comments like “YOU SHOULD COMMIT DIE, YOUR VIDEOS SUCKS” to more longer and more detailed like “Good good, but kinda needs this...........” ok got me? Go cowboy!
Bruh
@@bird5154 2 weeks late but your welcome
yeah you tell em bro
The bisector segment part got me dizzy
Arigato
super
this just gave me a major headache! ;(
Good luck you’ll get the hang of it soon probably
salu2 a los que van a ver el video por la tarea :v
solo vengo a morir
Very good, thank you.
tordack buy no
not satisfied confused
1 BSDM-A , Comment if andito kayo haha,