In my opinion, humble as it is , the Tissot and the Frederique Constant aren't even in the same ballpark . The FC every time . BTW Bruce , I was at an estate sale where I found a couple of extremely nice , collectable watches . I bought 3 , but the highlight was an original Tornek-Rayville 900, in absolutely beautiful condition. Definitely for my permanent collection. Just had to tell ya as I'm still floating in the clouds over my good fortune . Great video as always. And hey , always good seeing "the hair" !!!! It's you !!!
I have the FC Highlife. The blue is very intense under summer sunlight, in a satisfying way. And indeed, I also noticed the AR coating works really good - one of the best on my watches. Both, bracelet and rubber strap are comfortably to wear. I also found it found an even better discount then mentioned in the video, so I guess searching is worth while, as for most watches. I do not have yet have experience with the Tissot PRX, perhaps the new ice-blue automatic though, hm...
Personally I’d go for the FC. But buy whatever is in your price bracket. Both are good looking watches of that style. For a little under double the cost of the PRX quartz you can get the Powermatic 80 variant if you “need” an automatic (which also comes with a waffle style dial).
The modified Lazer regulated powermatic boost the price and availiability of the maintenance or repair of the automatic. In the the long term,that's a lot of money!
A perfect comment Bruce, "The right choice is your choice", I could not agree more, It really does not matter what the rest of the world thinks, the rest of the world will not be paying for it or enjoying wearing it.
I got a older FC highlife GMT triple time. Just amazing value , cosc 2893 movement with Frank Muller style numerals on the dial. Picked it up for 830 euro
Bruce, again a good video. I agree that it is the decision of everyone himself. There is no right or wrong. And one of the most important aspects from my point of view is that a product, be it a watch, a car or whatever should fit to one's budget. And do not buy a watch to impress other people, buy it for your own pleasure. BR from Germany Uwe
My PRX 80 runs at cosc +1 a day. I actually took it kayaking by accident and it held well and actually submerged it. I wouldn't recommend going swimming with it but the crown is very firmly fit. I like the Constant it's a beauty but you can almost buy all 3 variants of the prx 80 so it depends how you measure value.
I'm curious why you're worried about swimming with it or were surprised that held up well during kayaking given its 100 metres of water resistance. Would you care to share your thought process?
@@RebuildingSaad non screw down crown. For example at work I wear nylon gloves and there have been time I noticed my watch stopped as the crown was pulled open from taking off the nylon gloves. I believe watches that offer 100m wr should have a screwdown crown or a locking mechanism to secure the crown from accidentally being pulled open.
Thanks for putting the time and effort on this video Bruce. Just to conclude I'm going with the Frederique constant, but, as you say it's subjective and both are great watches.
@@rickybobby6760 It's a beautiful watch, but, recently I moved it on to purchase the Tudor " rootbeer". Don't let that put you off though its a terrific watch.
I own the FC and it is a very nice watch. Thanks, Bruce, for the tip on the watch and the discount! This is my edw. Very classy yet understated. I could not be more pleased. Bruce said the watch shows like a $3K watch. He was right.
For that integrated bracelet aesthetic, I'd pick a Tudor Royal over these two. It doesn't cost much more than the FC but carries more brand cachet and value retention when I inevitably move on as tastes and experiences change. The Tudor is more divisive in styling but I think it's more interesting and characterful. I also do like the juxtaposition of that brutish edginess and dressy elegance.
If you're unsure do what I did and get the PRX quartz and the Highlife. I think I have the best of both worlds in many ways: PRX quartz is more durable and accurate (of course. Highlife has the two straps and does look better than the PRX models IMO, the quality of the finishing is definitely better. I got the PRX quartz new from a dealer for 308 euro and the Highlife was used, worn a few times from ebay for 1200 euro. Both watches will depreciate a lot and be bargains second hand. Very happy with both my watches, feel like I have luxury AND utility... now just to get something one day with a green dial......
All 3 ( VC, FC & Tissot ) are are similar looking and you owned them. Thanks for your honest advice. The Tissot watch in the video is hiting at same spot beside markers. In my experience, the seconds hand can be adjusted in most 3 hand quartz Tissot watches by twisting the movement and the plastic retainer. There should be few degrees of wiggle room.
Thank you for the video and the quality of production. It feels like click bait to compare a quartz movement to an automatic movement watch review. Why not compare to the PRX AUTOMATIC version?
The Tissot is a good buy, and with the FC budget, you could get an Oris 65 diver, or Titoni, or Mido diver. It would depend upon what else you have. I'm tempted by the Tissot myself. Enjoy whatever you go with Steven
I would go for Tissot PRX Automatic. Great movement, still much less expensive than FC. And I also don’t find FC particularly handsome. The globe pattern looks quite strange on a non-worldtimer watch. It also doesn’t add to the originality of its design taking into consideration Patek Philippe Aquanaut. A well as ugly curved lugs resembling Omega Constellation.
FC in my opinion; I own one so I am biased! I agree that for the price Tissot makes a great 👍looking watch ⌚for the price. I think Hamilton are better for the buck. The FC is better than both but they cost more... I paid $1200.00 for a new watch....Great ⌚watch!!!!! I own an ML Aikon as well but mine is on leather strap which I like. It's not as nice as my highlife. I own an Aqua Terra as well and think the highlife FC is on par if not more refined! I would pass on both Nautilus and Royal Oak ....not worth it...... over priced
I think the watches you have, offer luxury, that will give you the same enjoyment, without breaking the bank. For me, the high end luxury watches would never be worth it, and ruin my enjoying of lower priced very good watches. Best wishes
Personally, I won’t ever buy another watch with pin/ collar sizing for the bracelet. Some may argue that it’s a better way, but not for me. I’d take split pins any day. Maybe I’m in the minority tho. Thanks for the great content Bruce! Love you my dude.
I can't do any more Swatch Group quartz watches. My Hamilton Khaki Pilot Day Date is awful, missing all the marks. But it was a gift, so I'm stuck with it...
I watched this to check out the highlife because I'm thinking about getting one. It looks great but is the bracelet bulky? Seems a little too substantial now that I see it on a wrist in moving pictures. But is it, or am I seeing things?
I say the automatic Tissot. At $1500 you start going into other competition and if it is my first higher-end watch, I would like better brand recognition that FC. So Tissot is my vote.
Wow, I like that Maurice LaCroix Aikon watch. You could say it is a poor mans Royal Oak, but for the most people an AP is way out of their reach (myself included). I'm not sure which one to choose; the PRX automatic or the Aikon.
I do like the FC more just because I’m not a fan of quartz version of the Tissot, however I do think that Tissot automatic is a good offer for about $600. FC looks like a well made watch and can’t argue COSC certified (big plus). For $2000 I would definitely be looking into Tudor Royal instead. in my opinion the best watch with integrated bracelet in the 2k range.
The very different between from Tissot quartz and FC mechanical is when the service time comes after 3 years the FC owner will feel the blue than the happy Tissot quartz owner, or a very blue of the mechanical Tissot watch's owner.
Another good candidate is Tissot Gentleman with the added benefit of silicon balance spring. PRX uses Nivachron which is a metal alloy. Both are excellent value though. Back in the old days you could buy big names for $500 - $1500 if we adjust for inflation. So, it's possible to get a decent watch in this price range if you pick smart.
Tissot quartz at $300 is packing a strong value? Against Seiko dress KXs? Or Smiths PRS25? Or Citizen's ecodrive promaster? Yes, I believe you are right. Everyone has a different idea of value or "worth-it-ness". Great vid though. Good points overall.
Both are solid choices but not fair to compare the two - they are at totally different end of the market - on value for money (and that’s what matters to the average person) the PRX is unbeatable
IMO these are both "beater" watches. If this is all you can afford then maybe stretch for the FC, but for someone who just wants an integrated look to add to their collection for fun, Id go with the Tissot Powermatic 80 variant at 600 bucks. You dont get any more cache from a FC than a Tissot, and I dont think the quality is worth double the price of the auto variant. I just bought the Tissot PM80 in Green as a fun beater watch, and think for 600 bucks it provides good value.
Both watchs have old fashion look,but i dont think they are the same,the price is realy diferent and the customer too,prx is more for young watch collector,FC is more dressy and elegant customer,i prefere the FC personaly,and cosc is good ,but you can also recomand a very diferent watch,the mido commander 1959 with cosc certification who have the same price than the frederique constant and will be god to see a video FC versus mido...
Hot damn, the bracelet on the FC and the case curves are gorgeous. But I think it would be fairer to pitch the PRX Powermatic against the FC and not the cheaper quartz. FC is a cut above the PRX in my book but as a value proposition there isn't a lot in it. Then again how many watch buyers put value as a primary factor when purchasing a watch?
@@davidcrandall4958 Price, well you either have the money to buy it or you don't. I don't buy on credit. Unless it's interest -free. Value involves all kinds of variables.
the prx automatic, like in the poll you showed, is awesome except for the water resistance. but you then showed a quartz prx next to the constant, that's a very unfair comparison.
Unfortunately, history counts with me. For that reason, the FC and ML would not be on my radar. The PRX auto, on the other hand, is very intriguing. Thanks, Bruce, nice review. 👍
I just had to make a similar decision. My AD had a pre-owned Aikon and I chose to order the PRX Powermatic 80. I liked the Aikon a little better but not 3 times the price better.
if I don't have any budget limit I will go for AP, if I have 20,000- GP, 10,000-Chopard, if I don't having that kind of money I will go only for the FC and not Tissot.. because there's no point to compromise on the quality if you don't care about quality you can always find cheap Chinese watches less than a 300$USD...😀
if money is no problem I would go with the royal oak, not because of the name, but I really think it's the best-looking watch of this type. but if I am being realistic here, I would go with the zenith defy if I want a nice luxury piece, or I will choose the tissot automatic if I want a nice value piece.
There is no question that the PRX should be the winner. The values is hands down better than the FC. It is an icon of two generations. Every single time I put on the PRX strangers walk up to be and ask me about it. I have gotten business because of the PRX! I had someone fall out of love with their Rolex because of the PRX's looks and value. I think you should also measure the watch by the statment is sends out over leaning on its brand name like the FC, Rolex etc. People know the PRX and may not really understand the brand name Tissot. This is the end of my love letter. Lol
How come some of these relatively new Chinese $100+ watches are higher quality than $350+ Tissot? I would get Fred. Constant between the two, inspires more confidence.
The FC and the Tissot are in 2 totally seperate price brackets with quartz and auto movements, they are in different worlds and can't be compared. find an auto tissot for $1500 and that would be a fair comparison.
As WIS we're all victims of the Law of Diminishing Returns....but without a doubt I'd go for the FC myself. Buy what makes you happy, it's only money and we'll be dead one day. Cheers Bruce and good luck Steven 👍🏻👍🏻
PRX Automatic any given day. FC design language a little unattractive compared to Tissot Royal Oak design. COSC is a bit irrelevant because you can have good accuracy in most of today’s watch standard. And in automatic you can get 80hrs of power reserve. What else can you ask for?
Why the Prx is better than a Seiko or a citizen that are at the same price?most of the the japonese quartz movements hit the markers,plus this watch is a homage ....is not original design
The FC High-Life has an ugly dial (the imprinted globe thing, and the minute hand could be a tad longer), otherwise, I like the FC case and bracelet and how they connect much better.
This guy seems knowledgeable and nice enough. Shame about that haircut though.
lol I love this comment
@@BruceWilliams Bruce buddy, you're the man. We can all just assume the haircut was some sort of inside joke.
Or maybe you lost a bet😄
In my opinion, humble as it is , the Tissot and the Frederique Constant aren't even in the same ballpark . The FC every time . BTW Bruce , I was at an estate sale where I found a couple of extremely nice , collectable watches . I bought 3 , but the highlight was an original Tornek-Rayville 900, in absolutely beautiful condition. Definitely for my permanent collection. Just had to tell ya as I'm still floating in the clouds over my good fortune . Great video as always. And hey , always good seeing "the hair" !!!! It's you !!!
@@fmartmart8099lol true. Or I like Rhinos too much or maybe I just never left the late 2000s
😄
Not sure why you are comparing a quartz and an automatic. Should have used the Tissot powermatic 80 instead
Powermatic80 > this FC easily
@@crankthatmarco yes!!
Tissot, because my bank account says so.
I agree. He even mentioned the PRX automatic but didn't compare them. Weird.
I was wondering the same thing. And every watch isn’t meant to be a diver - hence the name for the best water resistance.
I have the FC Highlife. The blue is very intense under summer sunlight, in a satisfying way. And indeed, I also noticed the AR coating works really good - one of the best on my watches. Both, bracelet and rubber strap are comfortably to wear. I also found it found an even better discount then mentioned in the video, so I guess searching is worth while, as for most watches.
I do not have yet have experience with the Tissot PRX, perhaps the new ice-blue automatic though, hm...
If you don't mind, how much did you pay for your FC? I picked up an FC Highlife Arabic dial here in Kuwait for a little over $1300
The FC looks more like a luxury watch. I agree with Bruce. Best of luck whichever you buy, you’re sure to get a really nice watch.
Personally I’d go for the FC. But buy whatever is in your price bracket. Both are good looking watches of that style. For a little under double the cost of the PRX quartz you can get the Powermatic 80 variant if you “need” an automatic (which also comes with a waffle style dial).
The modified Lazer regulated powermatic boost the price and availiability of the maintenance or repair of the automatic. In the the long term,that's a lot of money!
@@davidcrandall4958 how do you know it? You're a time traveller or something?
A perfect comment Bruce, "The right choice is your choice", I could not agree more, It really does not matter what the rest of the world thinks, the rest of the world will not be paying for it or enjoying wearing it.
I got a older FC highlife GMT triple time. Just amazing value , cosc 2893 movement with Frank Muller style numerals on the dial. Picked it up for 830 euro
Love the FC I have one and cant complain at all.
Bruce, again a good video. I agree that it is the decision of everyone himself. There is no right or wrong. And one of the most important aspects from my point of view is that a product, be it a watch, a car or whatever should fit to one's budget. And do not buy a watch to impress other people, buy it for your own pleasure. BR from Germany Uwe
That is a great point! Guten tag!
And I love Frederique Constant. Such beautiful, underrated designs...
My PRX 80 runs at cosc +1 a day. I actually took it kayaking by accident and it held well and actually submerged it. I wouldn't recommend going swimming with it but the crown is very firmly fit. I like the Constant it's a beauty but you can almost buy all 3 variants of the prx 80 so it depends how you measure value.
Good point James!
I'm curious why you're worried about swimming with it or were surprised that held up well during kayaking given its 100 metres of water resistance. Would you care to share your thought process?
@@RebuildingSaad non screw down crown. For example at work I wear nylon gloves and there have been time I noticed my watch stopped as the crown was pulled open from taking off the nylon gloves. I believe watches that offer 100m wr should have a screwdown crown or a locking mechanism to secure the crown from accidentally being pulled open.
I would choose the FC. very nice watch
Thanks for putting the time and effort on this video Bruce. Just to conclude I'm going with the Frederique constant, but, as you say it's subjective and both are great watches.
A year on, how is your experience with the FC?
@@rickybobby6760 It's a beautiful watch, but, recently I moved it on to purchase the Tudor " rootbeer". Don't let that put you off though its a terrific watch.
@@stephengarratt8027 Thank ypu!
I have just ordered an FC Classic index model...
I own the FC and it is a very nice watch. Thanks, Bruce, for the tip on the watch and the discount! This is my edw. Very classy yet understated. I could not be more pleased. Bruce said the watch shows like a $3K watch. He was right.
For that integrated bracelet aesthetic, I'd pick a Tudor Royal over these two. It doesn't cost much more than the FC but carries more brand cachet and value retention when I inevitably move on as tastes and experiences change. The Tudor is more divisive in styling but I think it's more interesting and characterful. I also do like the juxtaposition of that brutish edginess and dressy elegance.
That is a great point. I hope Tudor makes them more available. The USA barely gets any and they could sell really well
@@BruceWilliams I didn’t know they are hard to get over there!
@@chinwengkeong The two AD's I talk with have yet to see a steel Royal since they came out
@@BruceWilliams Let’s hope they stock them soon! Great vid as always btw
I've got the black bay 58 in original and blue so I love Tudor, but, just fancied the Frederique constant for some diversity.
Thanks for your comments
If you're unsure do what I did and get the PRX quartz and the Highlife. I think I have the best of both worlds in many ways: PRX quartz is more durable and accurate (of course. Highlife has the two straps and does look better than the PRX models IMO, the quality of the finishing is definitely better. I got the PRX quartz new from a dealer for 308 euro and the Highlife was used, worn a few times from ebay for 1200 euro. Both watches will depreciate a lot and be bargains second hand.
Very happy with both my watches, feel like I have luxury AND utility... now just to get something one day with a green dial......
All 3 ( VC, FC & Tissot ) are are similar looking and you owned them. Thanks for your honest advice.
The Tissot watch in the video is hiting at same spot beside markers. In my experience, the seconds hand can be adjusted in most 3 hand quartz Tissot watches by twisting the movement and the plastic retainer. There should be few degrees of wiggle room.
Bruce, you should have compared the FC with the PRX Powermatic 80.
Same points really except one has a less original dial and a very solid movement. Case, bracelet, crytstal, etc all the same as the quartz
I agree. So, lets turn this around.. compare the FC to the Seamaster, and then tell me the PRX Powermatic 80 isn’t a great watch at the price.
Another watch to consider is the formex essence leggera range of watches . cheers for the review.
Thank you for the video and the quality of production. It feels like click bait to compare a quartz movement to an automatic movement watch review. Why not compare to the PRX AUTOMATIC version?
I have the Aikon 39mm in slate dial with gold hands / indices and its awesome! Definitely worth a look
The Tissot is a good buy, and with the FC budget, you could get an Oris 65 diver, or Titoni, or Mido diver. It would depend upon what else you have. I'm tempted by the Tissot myself. Enjoy whatever you go with Steven
I would go for Tissot PRX Automatic. Great movement, still much less expensive than FC. And I also don’t find FC particularly handsome. The globe pattern looks quite strange on a non-worldtimer watch. It also doesn’t add to the originality of its design taking into consideration Patek Philippe Aquanaut. A well as ugly curved lugs resembling Omega Constellation.
@@mikehoward9912 haha well said :)
FC in my opinion; I own one so I am biased!
I agree that for the price Tissot makes a great 👍looking watch ⌚for the price. I think Hamilton are better for the buck.
The FC is better than both but they cost more... I paid $1200.00 for a new watch....Great ⌚watch!!!!!
I own an ML Aikon as well but mine is on leather strap which I like. It's not as nice as my highlife.
I own an Aqua Terra as well and think the highlife FC is on par if not more refined!
I would pass on both Nautilus and Royal Oak ....not worth it...... over priced
I think the watches you have, offer luxury, that will give you the same enjoyment, without breaking the bank. For me, the high end luxury watches would never be worth it, and ruin my enjoying of lower priced very good watches. Best wishes
That FC is gorgeous!👍
That’s hulk looks awesome Bruce , love your wrist roll. Never sell that
I own both the PRX and the FC Highlife . I like both , however the FC feels much better on the wrist .
The ‘Watch Idiot’ removed the seconds hand on his quartz PRX, and it looks great!
I would choose the FC all the way between those 2 watches 👍
Personally, I won’t ever buy another watch with pin/ collar sizing for the bracelet. Some may argue that it’s a better way, but not for me. I’d take split pins any day. Maybe I’m in the minority tho. Thanks for the great content Bruce! Love you my dude.
Love this channel
i go for FC... looks and feel more solid
I take the Tissot prx automatic.
I can't do any more Swatch Group quartz watches. My Hamilton Khaki Pilot Day Date is awful, missing all the marks. But it was a gift, so I'm stuck with it...
I watched this to check out the highlife because I'm thinking about getting one. It looks great but is the bracelet bulky? Seems a little too substantial now that I see it on a wrist in moving pictures. But is it, or am I seeing things?
I say the automatic Tissot. At $1500 you start going into other competition and if it is my first higher-end watch, I would like better brand recognition that FC. So Tissot is my vote.
Watch out for the newer modified 2824! price and availability of maintenance and repair will be a problem!
Saw the FC highlife and on my wrist. It is a very attractive watch for the money…
Question is: what do you like and what are you willing to pay? What is more “worth it” a Porsche or a Fiat?
Wow, I like that Maurice LaCroix Aikon watch. You could say it is a poor mans Royal Oak, but for the most people an AP is way out of their reach (myself included). I'm not sure which one to choose; the PRX automatic or the Aikon.
I do like the FC more just because I’m not a fan of quartz version of the Tissot, however I do think that Tissot automatic is a good offer for about $600. FC looks like a well made watch and can’t argue COSC certified (big plus). For $2000 I would definitely be looking into Tudor Royal instead. in my opinion the best watch with integrated bracelet in the 2k range.
We are talking very different price brackets here!
The very different between from Tissot quartz and FC mechanical is when the service time comes after 3 years the FC owner will feel the blue than the happy Tissot quartz owner, or a very blue of the mechanical Tissot watch's owner.
The Tissot prx powermatic 80 in my opinion is by far the best Swiss watch at the $500 range
Another good candidate is Tissot Gentleman with the added benefit of silicon balance spring. PRX uses Nivachron which is a metal alloy. Both are excellent value though. Back in the old days you could buy big names for $500 - $1500 if we adjust for inflation. So, it's possible to get a decent watch in this price range if you pick smart.
A good comparison, with lots of extras.
I have 2 FCs, I don't think it is in the same leagues as Longines...
These days I look for good levels of AR. Bruce what do you think between the FC and Monta? I'm in the market for that level of watch.
I would consider the Monta before the FC. Better build, and bracelet. Good luck with your decision.
Tissot quartz at $300 is packing a strong value? Against Seiko dress KXs? Or Smiths PRS25? Or Citizen's ecodrive promaster? Yes, I believe you are right. Everyone has a different idea of value or "worth-it-ness". Great vid though. Good points overall.
Both are solid choices but not fair to compare the two - they are at totally different end of the market - on value for money (and that’s what matters to the average person) the PRX is unbeatable
How about the FC vs sinn 556i?
I want to pull the trigger on the highlife but not sure how the gold plating will hold over the years.
I own prx because i didn't have the money for fc but i really like this fc
It might be fair to mention Tissot has some historical credit and also the PRX has its lineage originating from the vintage Tissot Seastar
IMO these are both "beater" watches. If this is all you can afford then maybe stretch for the FC, but for someone who just wants an integrated look to add to their collection for fun, Id go with the Tissot Powermatic 80 variant at 600 bucks. You dont get any more cache from a FC than a Tissot, and I dont think the quality is worth double the price of the auto variant. I just bought the Tissot PM80 in Green as a fun beater watch, and think for 600 bucks it provides good value.
Both watchs have old fashion look,but i dont think they are the same,the price is realy diferent and the customer too,prx is more for young watch collector,FC is more dressy and elegant customer,i prefere the FC personaly,and cosc is good ,but you can also recomand a very diferent watch,the mido commander 1959 with cosc certification who have the same price than the frederique constant and will be god to see a video FC versus mido...
I chose my Tissot gentleman in green for $600 otd.
I'm very tempted by the green. Wish it had AR
Hot damn, the bracelet on the FC and the case curves are gorgeous. But I think it would be fairer to pitch the PRX Powermatic against the FC and not the cheaper quartz. FC is a cut above the PRX in my book but as a value proposition there isn't a lot in it. Then again how many watch buyers put value as a primary factor when purchasing a watch?
Value and price,accept for an ever shrinking percentage,is a consideration!
@@davidcrandall4958 Price, well you either have the money to buy it or you don't. I don't buy on credit. Unless it's interest -free. Value involves all kinds of variables.
The FC is a pleasant surprise when you actually hold one and put it on your wrist
the prx automatic, like in the poll you showed, is awesome except for the water resistance. but you then showed a quartz prx next to the constant, that's a very unfair comparison.
What about the Tissot PRX 80
Isn't even a comparison. FC all the way.
Unfortunately, history counts with me. For that reason, the FC and ML would not be on my radar. The PRX auto, on the other hand, is very intriguing. Thanks, Bruce, nice review. 👍
I just had to make a similar decision. My AD had a pre-owned Aikon and I chose to order the PRX Powermatic 80. I liked the Aikon a little better but not 3 times the price better.
The cost plays such a factor considering how much you can enjoy the lesser priced option
love the quality of the Aikon but there is something about the design which i dont know how to describe... maybe "trying to hard" would be the words
if I don't have any budget limit I will go for AP, if I have 20,000- GP, 10,000-Chopard, if I don't having that kind of money I will go only for the FC and not Tissot.. because there's no point to compromise on the quality if you don't care about quality you can always find cheap Chinese watches less than a 300$USD...😀
if money is no problem I would go with the royal oak, not because of the name, but I really think it's the best-looking watch of this type.
but if I am being realistic here, I would go with the zenith defy if I want a nice luxury piece, or I will choose the tissot automatic if I want a nice value piece.
i would prefer FC HIGHLIFE its a much better product daily wear really intresting shield logo
I’d go FC. I think that their quality definitely a step up. I appreciate both and would like to own both if I was able.
There is no question that the PRX should be the winner. The values is hands down better than the FC. It is an icon of two generations. Every single time I put on the PRX strangers walk up to be and ask me about it. I have gotten business because of the PRX! I had someone fall out of love with their Rolex because of the PRX's looks and value.
I think you should also measure the watch by the statment is sends out over leaning on its brand name like the FC, Rolex etc. People know the PRX and may not really understand the brand name Tissot.
This is the end of my love letter. Lol
The modified 2824 will cost quite a bit more for maintenance and repair in the long run! I would stick with the quartz PRX!
That Tissot has the look.
Great video Bruce
Thank you Bruce!
How come some of these relatively new Chinese $100+ watches are higher quality than $350+ Tissot? I would get Fred. Constant between the two, inspires more confidence.
Is it just me or the prx second hand ticking misaligned ?
The best value is the PRX quartz. The PRX automatic is far too expensive for what it is. The highlife has a lot of value.
I love the high life but not the global detail in the dial. If it didn't have that I would have bought it a long time ago.
the price on the official website for Highlife COSC is $3975
why are you speaking about 1500?
Casioak vs Prx would be an interesting duel...
The Tissot PRX Powermatic would have been a similarly good watch as the FC for half the price. ;-)
what does mean chronometr?
The FC and the Tissot are in 2 totally seperate price brackets with quartz and auto movements, they are in different worlds and can't be compared. find an auto tissot for $1500 and that would be a fair comparison.
The price is different. Both of them are best at their price range.
Ball Engineer 3 Marvelight ice blue 👍👍👍
As WIS we're all victims of the Law of Diminishing Returns....but without a doubt I'd go for the FC myself. Buy what makes you happy, it's only money and we'll be dead one day.
Cheers Bruce and good luck Steven 👍🏻👍🏻
Thanks mate
PRX Automatic any given day. FC design language a little unattractive compared to Tissot Royal Oak design. COSC is a bit irrelevant because you can have good accuracy in most of today’s watch standard. And in automatic you can get 80hrs of power reserve. What else can you ask for?
If the price was even, I'd take the Omega.
Tissot gentleman powermaric silicium more comparable with Fc or prx automatic but in anyway prx quartz is extremely value for money watch
Globe pattern is odd for me on FC
weird comparison! Quartz vs Automatic? whats wrong with u
My Quartz PRX hits every marker. Just lucky I think. Not complaining.
Why the Prx is better than a Seiko or a citizen that are at the same price?most of the the japonese quartz movements hit the markers,plus this watch is a homage ....is not original design
The FC High-Life has an ugly dial (the imprinted globe thing, and the minute hand could be a tad longer), otherwise, I like the FC case and bracelet and how they connect much better.
FC, GP, Piaget, VC
Crazy my PRX powermatic just arrived yesterday and I couldn’t be happier. Great watch and well worth the $550 I paid for it
One vote for FC
Too many questions at the end, I feel attacked.
I feel like I made a mistake buying the Monta Atlas over the FC.
Monta still heck of a watch. But man that FC is such good value
@@BruceWilliams I'd say FC is a great value, for 1500 bucks you can't go wrong .
The Monta is a great watch
@@denisdaly1708 if you say so, I'm glad you like it.
Save for the Freddy.
Both watches are not all alike...1st price 2nd interchangeable straps price components and so on
Paid 270 USD for PRX
Quartz max price should be $200, without expensive materials or diamonds.
Tell that to Movado lol
Omega Constellation, anyone?