Why We Need to Study Nothing | Nautilus Narrations with Nate Hardy of

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @zinnyzxx
    @zinnyzxx 9 місяців тому +9

    I never thought I would see my love of space and Microwave combined. This is awesome

    • @danielleswingle7959
      @danielleswingle7959 9 місяців тому +1

      I feel the same! Geeking out

    • @NautilusMag
      @NautilusMag  9 місяців тому

      @@danielleswingle7959 These comments make us happier than you know. We're so glad we found you in this very unexpected venn diagram of Microwave and the cosmos.

  • @haroldprasatik3304
    @haroldprasatik3304 23 дні тому +1

    The density quoted is ridiculous. Given that reading, how much more is worth hearing. I'm giving up on it halfway through.

  • @WhenHel
    @WhenHel 9 місяців тому +5

    Artists have known this and explore it as negative space. A couple of examples: Non sites (Robert Smithson); Emily Dickinson (“Nothing is the force/That renovates the world”)

    • @NautilusMag
      @NautilusMag  9 місяців тому

      Thanks for these parallels. What else 🤔?

    • @gwinn75
      @gwinn75 23 дні тому

      @@NautilusMag From "The Stuff of Us" by Clem Snide:
      To be blessed is always to be cursed as well
      Dark matter holds it all in place
      So when we grind against it
      Let’s keep our angels true
      Our bodies bend the empty space

  • @peacefulcompassion
    @peacefulcompassion 23 дні тому

    well done 🌳

  • @romado59
    @romado59 7 місяців тому

    Forgetting the affect of electromagnetic is one greatest wrongs of astronomy.

  • @ahobisummer
    @ahobisummer 9 місяців тому +1

    I love u Nate 😭😭😭😭

  • @anthonyshiels9273
    @anthonyshiels9273 9 місяців тому +2

    Nothing is not nothing. It is a No THING.

  • @mikedavis979
    @mikedavis979 9 місяців тому +1

    10-15 GRAMS per cubic centimeter? Did I hear that right? in Interstellar space? That can't be right...that is 10-15 times as dense as liquid water! Oh, i bet it was supposed to be 1 x e-15 grams (or 10^-15). Yes, that makes more sense. In the transcript, it would look like 10-15 grams. So should be read as "ten to the negative fifteenth grams per cubic centimeter", "ten to the negative twenty-nineth grams per cubic centimeter", etc. Now THAT is pretty dang empty!

  • @ehello2993
    @ehello2993 8 місяців тому

    Microwave! But for real nothingness literally necessitates numerical existence.😊

  • @lisasolberg333
    @lisasolberg333 9 місяців тому +1

    SUNYATA!