Why can't you divide by zero? - TED-Ed

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 чер 2024
  • Check out our Patreon page: / teded
    View full lesson: ed.ted.com/lessons/why-can-t-...
    In the world of math, many strange results are possible when we change the rules. But there’s one rule that most of us have been warned not to break: don’t divide by zero. How can the simple combination of an everyday number and a basic operation cause such problems?
    Lesson by TED-Ed, animation by Nick Hilditch.
    Thank you so much to our patrons for your support! Without you this video would not be possible! Craig Sheldon, Andrew Bosco, Nik Maier, Adi V, Hiroshi Uchiyama, Chris , Vik Nagjee, Della Palacios, Alexander Walls, سلطان الخليفي, Ibel Wong, Kiarash Asar, Aliyya Rachmadi, Max Shuai Tang, Jamerson Chingapanini, Al the Scottish Wildcat, Janelle , Sabrina Gonzalez, Malcolm Callis, and Aaron Henson.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 12 тис.

  • @TEDEd
    @TEDEd  6 років тому +3200

    Thank you so much to everyone who has joined us over on patreon.com/teded! Your support is helping bring free educational materials to curious, life-long learners around the world!
    If you're interested in getting involved in supporting our nonprofit mission, check out our Patreon page!

    • @CartoonNetworkGlitches
      @CartoonNetworkGlitches 6 років тому +21

      0 Divided by 0 = 0

    • @Roach-zt6fc
      @Roach-zt6fc 6 років тому +21

      In my mind, I say division is giving a fixed number of ice-cream to a fixed number of kids. If I have 10 ice-creams, and 5 kids I can give them to, how many ice-creams does one kid get? The answer is 10/5=2. However, if I have 10 ice-creams, but there aren't any kids that I can give them to, how many does one kid get? Well, we can't say zero OR 10, which means such an operation is undefined.

    • @ykrareih1559
      @ykrareih1559 6 років тому +7

      What about Lelouch? He got divided by Zero lol

    • @magicmailman
      @magicmailman 6 років тому +10

      If you divide by 0 it is 0 because say you have 10 cookies if you divided them between 2 people each person gets 5 well we all know that but if you have those 10 cookies to 0 people how many dose each person get well if you have no people to give them to then no one can take them there for each person gets 0 because know people can take them

    • @swallowedinthesea11
      @swallowedinthesea11 6 років тому +8

      try: # Stay safe during the Coronavirus!
      10/0
      except:
      if ZeroDivisionError:
      print('Answer is INFINITY STONE!')

  • @echo.316
    @echo.316 4 роки тому +15793

    “1=2”
    *years of academy training wasted*

    • @VikasPoonia
      @VikasPoonia 4 роки тому +181

      It is not like that. I think he is trying to say something about the function that is how a 1/x function behaves when x tends to zero.

    • @tiredHooman
      @tiredHooman 4 роки тому +210

      Well
      0="0"
      0=[]
      But "0" is not equal to []

    • @nigaralizada7128
      @nigaralizada7128 4 роки тому +192

      @@tiredHooman I smell JavaScript here :D

    • @gamermapper
      @gamermapper 4 роки тому +35

      "1=2" = 0

    • @OBtheamazing
      @OBtheamazing 4 роки тому +16

      @@tiredHooman thats due to implicit conversions.
      0="0" assumes you accidental used "0" as CHAR.
      0=[] assumes that a number 0 is the same as a NULL
      "0"=[] doesnt work because a CHAR is a string of length 1 even regardless of what is in it and 1 does not equal 0
      this of it like this
      "0" = []
      is the same as asking
      "0000000000000000000" = []
      both are false

  • @KevinTyler123
    @KevinTyler123 2 роки тому +5340

    Math is quite interesting when you're not studying it for the test.

  • @shipweck6253
    @shipweck6253 2 роки тому +375

    Another interesting method is to use limits. If you look at a graph of 1/x, you’ll notice that the graph skyrockets up when approaching zero from the right, and plummets down when approaching zero from the left. This is because if we begin to approach zero from the right (or positive) side (by starting a 1 and then to 0.1 and then 0.01...), the answer approaches infinity. But when we approach zero from the left (or negative) side (from -1 to -0.1 to -0.01...) the answer approaches negative infinity. This means that if we were to assign a value to the graph when it reaches zero (yes I know you cannot do this), it would have to equal both positive and negative.

    • @commentarytalk1446
      @commentarytalk1446 2 роки тому +15

      In a sense that is a perfectly valid result. Do mathematicians not know how to use it (I suppose: "yet")? I'm sure they will find a big use for it if not already.

    • @hstochla
      @hstochla Рік тому +18

      Which also means that it can’t be a function, because that would leave two outputs for the same x value

    • @HeyWh
      @HeyWh Рік тому +4

      Yes.
      And if you try to find a solution to
      y = 8x +1
      16x - 2y = -2
      And do the math:
      16x + -2(8x + 1) = -2
      16x + -16x + -2 = -2
      0x = -2 - -2
      0x = -2 + 2
      0x = 0
      0x/0 = 0/0
      It comes out to:
      0/0 = ∞
      So the solution is infinitely many.
      Which, in my logic, proves n/0 = ±∞
      Depending if n is -i or i where i is an rational or irrational number.

    • @HeyWh
      @HeyWh Рік тому +4

      @@hstochla it can also be a solution of two linear functions.
      Where there's the same slope and y-intercept.
      y = -x
      7x + 7y = 0
      Equations ↑
      Steps↓
      7x + 7(-x) = 0
      7x - 7x = 0
      0x = 0
      0x/0 = 0/0
      Solution ↓
      0/0 = ∞
      There are infinitely many solutions to this problem.

    • @advikg
      @advikg Рік тому +3

      imo i don’t think this is the best way of looking at it as 1/x^2 goes to positive infinity from both the right and left, but you still can’t divide by 0

  • @nuzayerov
    @nuzayerov Рік тому +75

    This can also very nicely be explained by using a y = 1/x graph. Where x approaching from positive x-axis to 0 gives us an Infinitely large positive number. While x approaching from negative x-axis to 0 gives us an infinitely large negative number. And 1/0 cannot be both positive and negative infinity at the same time.

  • @wukennylee4926
    @wukennylee4926 5 років тому +5683

    Wait, so "MATH ERROR" isn't a number ?

    • @myheartwillstopinjoy8142
      @myheartwillstopinjoy8142 5 років тому +277

      I feel bad for ur math teacher 😂😂

    • @determineddaaf3
      @determineddaaf3 5 років тому +211

      Wait this is math? I thought it was History.
      So I guess there wasn't a guy called "Infinity" who discovered Amerika...

    • @ascend1685
      @ascend1685 5 років тому +110

      Wait...wasn’t the guy who discovered america called pi?

    • @hellotoaster4302
      @hellotoaster4302 5 років тому +77

      No, that one discovered space.

    • @HoardEG
      @HoardEG 5 років тому +114

      You've got it all wrong. Syntax error discovered the earth, and many many years in the future pi found the continent now known as "America". Before that, there was already "i"'s all over America, but they didn't count since they were technically imaginary. But nowadays, if you take 1 apple and eat 2 of it then you can take what's left (-1 apple) and use it's square root to bring back an i. However, this is highly illegal so don't credit me as the one who told you.
      (PS: MATH ERROR was the creator of earth)

  • @gd131
    @gd131 4 роки тому +4810

    "Congratulations! You've earned 2nd place!"
    Me: "Let me tell you how 2=1."

  • @cubicalgamer2402
    @cubicalgamer2402 Рік тому +110

    I tried something similar to this. Just as sqrt(-1) = i, I defined 1/0 as o. Then, I went as far as I could trying to figure out all the properties of this new number that I could. I had to bend quite a few rules and I still ran into a bunch of contradictions. I hope that someday, as my math knowledge grows, I can make o a number.

  • @mitragh7595
    @mitragh7595 6 місяців тому +17

    Math teacher here! Beautifully explained. Thank you for the great work 🙏

  • @cruithne_
    @cruithne_ 3 роки тому +3510

    My maths teacher has a shorter answer: "trust me, just don't"

    • @ikimiyu
      @ikimiyu 2 роки тому +27

      Lol

    • @wackyanimations3326
      @wackyanimations3326 2 роки тому +119

      thats solid advice tbh

    • @---kj1rl
      @---kj1rl 2 роки тому +7

      😭

    • @kstoeb
      @kstoeb 2 роки тому +75

      Actually as a maths-teacher myself, that's exactly what I'm doing ;-) But from now on I'm gonna show the argumentation of this video to at least my higher classes. Thanks.

    • @M1551NGN0
      @M1551NGN0 2 роки тому +28

      Mine says
      "Stick to CBSE syllabus"

  • @LegendOfMario
    @LegendOfMario 5 років тому +2308

    2:41
    "Why can't we take the square root of negative numbers, John?"
    "Because you just can't, Emmy."
    "What if I would call it "i"?"
    "Wait, how would that even make se-"
    *A WHOLE NEW WORLD OF MATH OPENS UP*

    • @14o1chan
      @14o1chan 5 років тому +64

      Does 'i' mean 'imaginary' or 'impossible'?

    • @mohadeseh9736
      @mohadeseh9736 5 років тому +114

      Cosmic Cyborg it’s imaginary

    • @14o1chan
      @14o1chan 5 років тому +10

      @@mohadeseh9736 *got it

    • @LadyOfTheDog
      @LadyOfTheDog 5 років тому +23

      AAA WHOLLLLEE NEW WORLDDD

    • @blackimbreon9451
      @blackimbreon9451 5 років тому +4

      Guess what the square root of -1 is the square root of -1 aka i

  • @Kaldrin
    @Kaldrin Рік тому +20

    I really liked the comparison with complex numbers and the multiplication by infinity, was very cool and clear, I never looked at this angle

  • @Damaris_Lane
    @Damaris_Lane Рік тому +14

    Didn’t know I could enjoy maths. This was wholesome. Thanks Ted-Ed.

  • @agareverie
    @agareverie 5 років тому +3490

    Nice try, but we all know
    0 ÷ 0 = ERROR

  • @imnotsus132
    @imnotsus132 3 роки тому +3769

    *Everyone gangsta till they realize the only number in the whole world that has no value is the most complicated to understand*

    • @stixoimatizontas
      @stixoimatizontas 3 роки тому +147

      Because it's literally the image of a set of nothing.

    • @doriangrigorie7345
      @doriangrigorie7345 3 роки тому +150

      @@stixoimatizontas and "nothing" doesnt exist, there is always something everywhere, no matter how empty the place looks. We can apply every number into our reality more or less, but not 0

    • @altheamantes2041
      @altheamantes2041 3 роки тому +6

      HI

    • @user-lh5hl4sv8z
      @user-lh5hl4sv8z 3 роки тому +13

      @@doriangrigorie7345 What if the you’re unconscious and everything around you is nothing

    • @siegfriedstgo3545
      @siegfriedstgo3545 3 роки тому +11

      @@doriangrigorie7345 if you want to go from point a to b but you need to pass trought c and c is in the Middle, an the through d that is in the Middle of c-d and we apply that to our physical World, theres infinite SPACE un any direction, we are sorrounded by complete emptines
      Sorry if I have grammar errors, my native lenguage isnt english

  • @VeggieBoii
    @VeggieBoii Рік тому +27

    I always thought that any number divided by 0 would equal 0 because any number times 0 is 0 and if you swapped the numbers around to divide it you'd get 0 ÷ any number is 0

    • @sheilak173
      @sheilak173 Рік тому +1

      Opposite way! 0÷1=0 but 1÷0= ?

    • @VeggieBoii
      @VeggieBoii Рік тому +1

      @@sheilak173 I guess it would also be 0?

    • @sheilak173
      @sheilak173 Рік тому +1

      @@VeggieBoii pretty sure it's undefined

    • @abhilashasinha5186
      @abhilashasinha5186 Рік тому

      infinity or something else

    • @sheilak173
      @sheilak173 Рік тому

      @@abhilashasinha5186 yeah

  • @felipe.hooper
    @felipe.hooper Рік тому +12

    This is absolutely the best explanation that I've ever seen. Thank you very much!!

  • @kimjongun9696
    @kimjongun9696 4 роки тому +4283

    When you realize that "0" is a portal to two different worlds one is positive and one is negative

  • @ThePinkRubber
    @ThePinkRubber 2 роки тому +2720

    Other animal : *eat, sleep, reproduce. Try to survive.
    Humans : "what if i divide 10 with 0"

  • @ZeroKung2309
    @ZeroKung2309 Рік тому +3

    I enjoy watching this alot more than learning at school for exam

    • @Bruhh221
      @Bruhh221 3 місяці тому +1

      hi :3 UwU

    • @Bruhh221
      @Bruhh221 3 місяці тому +1

      upload more video ☹️☹️☹️

  • @fuberlin1
    @fuberlin1 Рік тому +4

    Finally! I can now in piece acceppt that this is not possible! Great explanation! Thank you!

  • @runonline4065
    @runonline4065 2 роки тому +1581

    ♾ next generation mathematicians breaking rule:
    The inverse of infinity is 8

    • @p3el_
      @p3el_ 2 роки тому +44

      Frickin' sideway 8, always breaking everything

    • @Bob_games100
      @Bob_games100 2 роки тому +7

      Sideways 8 is infinite :/

    • @mattynek2
      @mattynek2 2 роки тому +12

      That's more like half of inverse

    • @bhartiyacreature4950
      @bhartiyacreature4950 2 роки тому +1

      @@mattynek2 lol true

    • @BlastingRyan609
      @BlastingRyan609 2 роки тому +1

      @@Bob_games100 r/woooooosh

  • @PresumedGecko20
    @PresumedGecko20 4 роки тому +3678

    "Imagine that you have zero cookies and you split them evenly among zero friends. How many cookies does each person get? See? It doesn't make sense. And Cookie Monster is sad that there are no cookies, and you are sad that you have no friends."
    -Siri
    September 17, 2014 - Present

    • @sainbaatar518
      @sainbaatar518 4 роки тому +89

      You are telling us about 0÷X=0 which is possible but we are talking about X÷0=Error here

    • @alberteinsteinscousin5966
      @alberteinsteinscousin5966 4 роки тому +7

      Infinitely small

    • @fakenio242
      @fakenio242 4 роки тому +5

      sans I was late to the party

    • @CookieGal-
      @CookieGal- 4 роки тому +35

      @@sainbaatar518 No he is talking about 0÷0. 0÷X is always 0. If you were to divide, say 2 by 0, you can never multiply 0 to get to 2. You would never share the 2 to anyone, and if you are inversing the multiplication to get 2 ÷ 0, you never had the 2 in the first place, so you couldn't possibly share it. You get caught in a loop, which is infinite, and I think that is why the logistical conclusion people come to when dividing by zero is infinity.

    • @PedroMartins-lv1um
      @PedroMartins-lv1um 4 роки тому +12

      @@sainbaatar518 0÷0 is also impossible, btw

  • @pallavij520
    @pallavij520 5 місяців тому +1

    I worked on the math work on division, multiplication and addition. 1:41 The thing is a example:12/2=6*2=12

  • @KenWiggerAnotherAncientGamer

    Thanks for sharing!

  • @billyk8397
    @billyk8397 6 років тому +17750

    Yes, and the mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell

    • @HB-jf6yq
      @HB-jf6yq 6 років тому +553

      I despise comments like yours.

    • @Inthepurpledude
      @Inthepurpledude 6 років тому +439

      Ahh. The first meme.

    • @immaderpo5218
      @immaderpo5218 6 років тому +395

      Yes, and the ribosomes are the factories of the cell, generating proteins.

    • @TheCocaKolya
      @TheCocaKolya 6 років тому +128

      -Why can't you?
      -yes.

    • @thecpt6265
      @thecpt6265 6 років тому +190

      and the energy currency of the cells is ATP , or Adenosine Tri-Phosphate

  • @jugchugeat1110
    @jugchugeat1110 3 роки тому +2365

    This one does not spark joy:
    you cant devide by zero
    This one sparks joy:
    Zero has no multiplicative inverse

  • @augustjologs1
    @augustjologs1 8 днів тому +2

    Sensible explanation, but you cannot use Multiplicative Property of Equality for operations involving infinity. MPE is limited to finite real numbers, not infinity.

  • @grooviehoovie4179
    @grooviehoovie4179 28 днів тому

    also relevant is that its approaching -infinity from the other side making the graph of 1/x asymptotic at 0

  • @dakshadhar2305
    @dakshadhar2305 5 років тому +8035

    Take 10$
    Divide it with all your friends
    Since you have no friends 10÷0= infinity
    Now you have infinite money
    PROBLEM SOLVED...

    • @wx971
      @wx971 5 років тому +613

      Well You are present so divide it by 1 😂😂

    • @destroyercrush1052
      @destroyercrush1052 5 років тому +156

      Utsav Mishra Unless you’re inside out. You wouldn’t count as 1 but -1

    • @fadhil4008
      @fadhil4008 5 років тому +170

      Yeah, it'll be infinite money. But it isnt your money my dude

    • @fadhil4008
      @fadhil4008 5 років тому +90

      If you aren't present yourself. You wouldn't get the money. Bcz at first, that money is for your friends only

    • @josephmarcolopez7824
      @josephmarcolopez7824 5 років тому +47

      why there is no "HAHA" react???

  • @davidbowen6892
    @davidbowen6892 3 роки тому +1641

    Me: *solves the question*
    The whole universe: *collapses into itself*

    • @jpsned
      @jpsned 3 роки тому +6

      I've had that same notion for a long time, too. 😀

    • @HauNguyen-ih7vk
      @HauNguyen-ih7vk 3 роки тому +14

      Infinity × 0 = 0

    • @helldronez
      @helldronez 3 роки тому +29

      well it's easy actually, you cant divide 8 pizza to noone right? you can't share pizza if there's noone to share. so the answer is you can't.

    • @chalking2641
      @chalking2641 3 роки тому +13

      @@helldronez yeah but you can eat it all by urself tho

    • @helldronez
      @helldronez 3 роки тому +16

      @@chalking2641 thats true lmao, now i want 1 pizza damn

  • @naparpatche
    @naparpatche Рік тому

    Ty for the answer

  • @fumikato
    @fumikato 2 роки тому

    im here to appreciate some amazing animation

  • @ayushtiwari8190
    @ayushtiwari8190 3 роки тому +2993

    Me explaining my parents after getting my maths exam result:-
    Let me explain you how 20=0 and 100=0 . Therefore we conclude that 20=100. You must be satisfied now

  • @Xoplex
    @Xoplex 2 роки тому +866

    “That’s not necessarily wrong, it’s just not true”

    • @MayMayCentre
      @MayMayCentre 2 роки тому +57

      In our world of numbers.

    • @monsieurandiant
      @monsieurandiant 2 роки тому +45

      "He is not necessarily dead, only his heart isn't beating."

    • @barelyprotestant5365
      @barelyprotestant5365 2 роки тому +1

      @@MayMayCentre that presupposes a particular philosophy of numbers.

    • @czyruszamora5309
      @czyruszamora5309 2 роки тому +4

      I get that...true is not wrong

    • @thatrandomdev5039
      @thatrandomdev5039 2 роки тому +11

      I didn't lose, I merely failed to win!

  • @anishashee8511
    @anishashee8511 Рік тому +4

    Square root of negative 1 is still called as imaginary number 😅 Btw very interesting and informative video. And one of the best thing about TED-ED is they literally make videos on every topic whether it's science, literature, economics anything.👍💙

    • @1three7
      @1three7 9 місяців тому

      One cool thing about i though is how it's used in quantum mechanics to describe the probabilistic wave function. It is used to get to exceptionally accurate numbers in the real world. It isn't just a weird math trick it is useful for tangible real world experiments which have given the most accurate scientific results in human history.

  • @jacksonmwangi6546
    @jacksonmwangi6546 2 роки тому

    Great explanation

  • @NoBudjetFilms
    @NoBudjetFilms 2 роки тому +2923

    5 minutes of TED-Ed made math much more interesting than 13 years of school ever did.

    • @Dilindersinghc
      @Dilindersinghc 2 роки тому +11

      😏😂👍

    • @sunshinegirl20064
      @sunshinegirl20064 2 роки тому +11

      That's hella true

    • @getsetgaming3475
      @getsetgaming3475 2 роки тому +2

      True

    • @nihalr385
      @nihalr385 2 роки тому +22

      You just had a bad teacher

    • @fede_lcc2078
      @fede_lcc2078 2 роки тому +55

      Getting tired of these kind of comments. The people who made this cool video also had to go through boring math and study pain before being able to distill such knowledge in a video. You can't compare formal education with entertainment videos as if one could replace the other

  • @huanglee3829
    @huanglee3829 3 роки тому +2544

    "Two plus two is four." - Big Shaq

  • @rainbowplazma3333
    @rainbowplazma3333 Рік тому +3

    I see division as not only splitting it up but also repeated subtraction. Dividing a number by zero is asking how many zeros it takes to get that number to zero

  • @JohnYuFitness
    @JohnYuFitness 3 місяці тому

    The proof by contradiction was fun to watch in the end!

  • @yuranival
    @yuranival 6 років тому +1870

    That green-bearded man looked sad after hearing it was a story for another day. I would love to hear that story explained in such an affordable and picturesque way. Love your videos!!

    • @robertstuckey6407
      @robertstuckey6407 6 років тому +50

      That was Bernard Riemann. He was a pretty melancholy person throughout his life. His mathematics is super neat though!

    • @sunflower9481
      @sunflower9481 6 років тому

      Hahaha I didn't notice

    • @J48038
      @J48038 6 років тому +16

      *all around me are familiar faces, worn out places*

    • @luciferangelica
      @luciferangelica 6 років тому +1

      J tell it to your bunny friend, donnie darko, and get me the reimann method!

    • @ashokgite4210
      @ashokgite4210 6 років тому +2

      0 comes in set of whole number.

  • @WholesomeLad
    @WholesomeLad 6 років тому +576

    *Holds up no fingers
    "How many fingers am I holding up?"
    *"infinite"*

  • @AnneMarcyandsashaVlog-md9ev
    @AnneMarcyandsashaVlog-md9ev Місяць тому

    This blew my mind

  • @aammirati91
    @aammirati91 2 роки тому +624

    The best explanation I've seen is when you graph the negative numbers too. You'll see that at zero the y value tends toward both positive and negative infinity at the same time

    • @fahrenheit2101
      @fahrenheit2101 2 роки тому +28

      Yeah I was annoyed that they didn't flag it up.

    • @luk1416
      @luk1416 Рік тому +2

      That's how my Algebra teacher explained it

    • @animezoneamv9116
      @animezoneamv9116 Рік тому +1

      @@luk1416 You have separate teachers for algebra and geometry?

    • @luk1416
      @luk1416 Рік тому +8

      @@animezoneamv9116 I'm not taking a geometry class

    • @jackmatchett1805
      @jackmatchett1805 Рік тому +2

      so 0?

  • @user-vt5ik1xi7l
    @user-vt5ik1xi7l 3 роки тому +874

    Teacher :- How can we kill students?
    Mathematicians :- Yes

  • @enzocheung7254
    @enzocheung7254 7 місяців тому +1

    HEY ALL GUYS!!! i got i question, at the vedio explain 0*∞+0*∞,he combine (0+0) to multiply ∞ , the(0+0) equal to 2*0,so the consequence is 2*0*∞ equal to 2 in his defination!

  • @ralphcantor4605
    @ralphcantor4605 Місяць тому

    i remember watching this when i was in 4th grade bruh ig i can now make a slight critique with how u couldve improved on the visuals there in some of the math parts, i wouldve appreciated that back then lmao

  • @FBurck
    @FBurck 2 роки тому +765

    This is how my algebra Professor explained it and I still remember till to this day. Probably the best math teacher I have ever had.

    • @wren_.
      @wren_. Рік тому

      what if we make 1/0 equal some made up number? if 1/0=U, problem solved

    • @Marendra_Nody
      @Marendra_Nody Рік тому +4

      Looks like he once counted zebra. After counting all he counted Allzebra.🤣🤣🤣

    • @Xgil2Play
      @Xgil2Play 8 місяців тому +3

      Yet another example that explaining "why", is the best way to teach.

  • @borkmaster2726
    @borkmaster2726 6 років тому +541

    "Imagine that you have 0 cookies and you split them evenly among 0 friends. How many cookies does each person get? See, it doesn't make sense. And Cookie Monster is sad that there are no cookies. And you are sad that you have no friends." - Siri, 2018

    • @sakashrimpy
      @sakashrimpy 5 років тому

      Eric Lee indeed

    • @janariver3450
      @janariver3450 5 років тому

      My God Siri 😂😂😂😂

    • @emc246
      @emc246 5 років тому

      @Eric Lee But she has probably said it at least once in 2018.

    • @Magnezium7
      @Magnezium7 5 років тому +4

      Yes, I have 0 cookies and 0 friends

    • @yashshejwal7791
      @yashshejwal7791 5 років тому

      Asked by Ramanujan ages ago

  • @divyansh.__.sharma
    @divyansh.__.sharma 9 місяців тому

    You are very interesting like you changed my thinking about this

  • @TheNarrator48
    @TheNarrator48 Рік тому

    This video made math so much fun

  • @supercanadian0640
    @supercanadian0640 6 років тому +1535

    I tried to divide by zero once
    Had to find another univerve soon after mine was destroyed

    • @TheIndogamer
      @TheIndogamer 6 років тому +20

      I tried the same but I ended up making another universe

    • @Inthepurpledude
      @Inthepurpledude 6 років тому +7

      Raihan Purboyo oh u must've divided by infinity then.

    • @zzzzz28
      @zzzzz28 6 років тому

      Brb amma type 0÷0 in cal

    • @hafsa.boumihafsaboumi1705
      @hafsa.boumihafsaboumi1705 6 років тому

      The Ace Of Spades so did I and then I tried to look for new eyes cuz mine were plucked by the teacher X)

    • @geralferald
      @geralferald 6 років тому

      Identity of Rick Sanchez confirmed

  • @llamalover02
    @llamalover02 8 місяців тому +1

    I accidentally divided by zero while doing homework when exhausted. My whole notebook burst into flames.

  • @DEBBIEBOOS
    @DEBBIEBOOS 10 місяців тому

    This shook my whole idea of maths and now my head is spinning.

  • @Anto01243
    @Anto01243 5 років тому +373

    -I'm gonna live dangerous from now.
    -How? Are you gonna go live alone, without anybody and be independent?
    -No, i'm gonna divide numbers by 0.
    - ...

    • @terminatroll-_-3269
      @terminatroll-_-3269 5 років тому +7

      *divide by zero, start autocombustion*
      wha-

    • @kate00san
      @kate00san 4 роки тому

      be good, start stuff like hippasus created irrational numbers.

  • @TheThunderBat
    @TheThunderBat 5 років тому +455

    The multiplicative inverse could also be called
    “Reciprocal”

    • @AwaisKhan-mh6cd
      @AwaisKhan-mh6cd 5 років тому +7

      exactly

    • @AYUSHGAMEROFFICIAL
      @AYUSHGAMEROFFICIAL 4 роки тому +3

      Both are same

    • @Anonymous-pr3gr
      @Anonymous-pr3gr 4 роки тому +2

      Not could. They are equal.

    • @medielijah
      @medielijah 4 роки тому +6

      Such a smartass comment...

    • @caringheart34
      @caringheart34 4 роки тому +3

      I thought that the multiplicative inverse is applied to whole numbers only and reciprocals to fractions... But yeah same answer.

  • @siewheilou399
    @siewheilou399 3 місяці тому

    1÷0 is indivisible, but I also read that 1/0 is used to represent infinity.
    And what is the standard in programming? When a 1÷0 or N÷0 situation occurred, what is the standard way to handle that? Return an error occurred and skip it or just skip it? or used an error capture algorithm?

  • @shivam5878
    @shivam5878 Рік тому

    as always, their animator is so good 😀

  • @AceW.Kermitcat
    @AceW.Kermitcat 5 років тому +1691

    “Imagine you have zero cookies and you split them among zero friends how many cookies does each person get? See?
    It doesn’t make sense, and cookie monster is sad that there are no cookies, and you are sad because you have no friends.”

    • @teresabautista836
      @teresabautista836 5 років тому +132

      Hi Siri

    • @meh7272
      @meh7272 5 років тому +3

      Nah

    • @peacelover21
      @peacelover21 5 років тому +36

      We can split infinite zero cookies among infinite zero friends

    • @darkjanissary5718
      @darkjanissary5718 5 років тому +31

      It is simple:
      0 / 0 = 0

    • @funnyguy1059
      @funnyguy1059 5 років тому +7

      Ace Kermitcat nice the Siri line of when you ask her what’s 0 divided by 0?

  • @akshay3078
    @akshay3078 3 роки тому +319

    4:03: It's all zero?
    Always has been

  • @IluminousOne-9.7.2
    @IluminousOne-9.7.2 10 днів тому +1

    Fact: Only Chuck Norris' calculator properly shows dividing by zero

  • @eggdog4906
    @eggdog4906 Рік тому +8

    I was wondering why they didn't just make new rules. 3 minutes in and my hopes and dreams are crushed XD

    • @tonysparks1682
      @tonysparks1682 Рік тому

      I made new rules check this out lol...
      The recent discovery of net energy gain produced in a fusion reaction made me realize I discovered the formula for cold fusion a while ago. Here is the equation...
      0^a * 0^b = a * b
      This means...
      0^1 * 0^1 = 1 * 1
      Which means...
      0 * 0 = 1 * 1
      Which also means ...
      0 * 0 = 1
      I'm attempting to highlight there is a spectrum to what we call nothing or what we mathematically denote to be 0.
      Conceptually speaking, what we call/describe as nothing physically holds energy and this is proven by zero field energy or the fact that absolute zero still has yet to be discovered to naturally exist in this universe.
      This math is a product of my attempt to mathematically describe the energy stored in vacuums of space we tend to call nothing.
      Here is the math/formula that lead to this conclusion...
      x/0 = 0^x
      If you solve for x then...
      x = 0^x * 0
      If x = 1 then that means...
      1 = 0^1 * 0
      Which also means...
      1 = 0^1 * 0^1
      Because I'm still a mathematician, i will still acknowledge and say...
      1*1 = 1
      So due to the transitive property and continuing with the equation above, this must be true...
      1*1 = 0^1 * 0^1
      Which lead me to the conclusion...
      a * b = 0^a * 0^b
      Or...
      0^a * 0^b = a * b
      ( You should be aware I've taken Algebra 1 and 2 and AB Calculus and I'm still saying what I'm saying. If you disagree with my use of exponential notation, my algebraic logic is still sound.)
      Thank you
      -Tony Sparks😁😎🤑

    • @nutronstar45
      @nutronstar45 Рік тому

      @@tonysparks1682 im currently trying to dissect this incoherent comment
      edit: your algebraic logic is basically nonexistent

    • @noahfields9046
      @noahfields9046 Рік тому

      ​@@tonysparks1682
      > x/0 = 0^x
      This is wrong and any steps that involved it as a hypothesis are unsound.
      0^a * 0^b = a * b
      This is nonsensical. 0^a = 0 * 0 * ... [a times] ... 0 = 0. Your formula holds if and only if a * b = 0, and your second step - assuming a = b = 1 - is thus unsound.
      I don't know what algebra courses you've taken, but if they did not make the fact that this is completely incorrect mathematics clear, they weren't very good.

  • @user-qi3cp9ps6n
    @user-qi3cp9ps6n 4 роки тому +804

    Maths Teacher : "So, one equals two"
    Me: "Oddly enough, that's not mathematically wrong"

    • @chongjunxiang3002
      @chongjunxiang3002 4 роки тому +33

      Now that 2+2=5 is making sense.

    • @davidgumazon
      @davidgumazon 3 роки тому +4

      You can divide zero by reality warping
      The boundary between zero and something is division
      By that logic you can divide a nonexistence with existence
      Existence of Boundary

    • @aklsamaan7622
      @aklsamaan7622 3 роки тому

      *Listen!*
      Math is useless!
      Not everything, + × ÷ - are usefull, but things like 2x+3y=10, thats just useless, they tell us its usefull, but look at my mom and dad! They were the best in their classes and now they don't even think about math

    • @marcovoetberg6618
      @marcovoetberg6618 3 роки тому +14

      @@aklsamaan7622 Except of course that it isn't. Just because you, or your mom and dad cannot find uses for math doesn't mean there aren't any. Every time you drive your car or take an airplane or use your mobile phone or use any other piece of technology you are using the fruits of math.

    • @johannoas1
      @johannoas1 3 роки тому +1

      If you can explain it why it is not wrong, then maybe the teacher might give you some points.
      But usually you use the given rules of "normal" maths where it is in fact wrong for your problem

  • @cup_check_official
    @cup_check_official 6 років тому +1333

    because there's a fine line between a numerator and a denominator...

  • @wisteela
    @wisteela Місяць тому

    Very well explained. Subscribed.
    I've thought you could say if you divide by zero, you've not divided it, so it's still equal to the original number.

  • @floydmacintire
    @floydmacintire 6 місяців тому

    X/0 can be applied to calculating the surface area of a sphere as well as calculating the density of a singularity

  • @faiq006
    @faiq006 3 роки тому +522

    When you have 5 minutes until your math test but you still want entertainment:

  • @Table_Down_Left737
    @Table_Down_Left737 2 роки тому +862

    “If you split 0 pieces of pizza between 1 friend how much would each friend get?" 0
    “If you split 1 piece of pizza between 0 friends how much would each friend get?" Wait a sec

    • @bootypluderer
      @bootypluderer 2 роки тому +544

      And If you split 1 friend between 2 people , you’ll be sent to federal prison.
      Math is hard.

    • @thepixelatedpie
      @thepixelatedpie 2 роки тому +92

      @@bootypluderer I actually laughed out loud when I read this

    • @soniahurtado9778
      @soniahurtado9778 2 роки тому +18

      1 because ur the only one left :)

    • @aisonjosephthomas6854
      @aisonjosephthomas6854 2 роки тому +36

      @@soniahurtado9778 he has no friends BRUH

    • @nickmorris6020
      @nickmorris6020 2 роки тому +8

      The universe ceases to exist

  • @Wanted797
    @Wanted797 10 місяців тому

    1:16 omg I never thought of the symbol a something split in half like that!

  • @soundstudio7803
    @soundstudio7803 Рік тому

    How to make a mathematician cry: 2:00

  • @Hilmemes669
    @Hilmemes669 6 років тому +206

    It's just a bug. Maybe in the next universe update, we can divide by zero.

    • @kappapond
      @kappapond 6 років тому +2

      Hilmi Dzul Lol

    • @diamondkane5101
      @diamondkane5101 6 років тому +23

      Don't push the glitch the universe might crash

    • @MrKahlil1001
      @MrKahlil1001 6 років тому +1

      This comment deserves like 300, 500 likes like the rest of those witty perceptions to this video

    • @yu5016
      @yu5016 6 років тому

      Omg I saw herobrine.

    • @minhaophu3289
      @minhaophu3289 6 років тому +1

      +Scientific Skyfire Δ did someone take your money?

  • @FrostyAUT
    @FrostyAUT 5 років тому +296

    "Riemann, a mathematician so wise and so powerful, he could influence mathematics to divide ... by zero."
    "Can this power be learned?"
    "Not from this video."

    • @thoggerspass6282
      @thoggerspass6282 5 років тому +9

      Ironic, he could save others from being divided by zero, but not himself.

    • @Dayserking
      @Dayserking 5 років тому +1

      I know what’s troubling you, listen to me. Don’t continue to be a pawn of real numbers!

    • @lampoilropebombs0640
      @lampoilropebombs0640 4 роки тому

      I just generated the exact same thought as a 7th grader

  • @aseretbrown
    @aseretbrown Рік тому

    2:50 - opening up a whole now world of hard homework. Jokes aside, this was really interesting.

  • @qastra_
    @qastra_ Рік тому +1

    I watched this while eating quesadillas. I still taste it.

  • @mamacito1795
    @mamacito1795 2 роки тому +283

    "Imagine you know nothing about infinity" done and done.

    • @ikimiyu
      @ikimiyu 2 роки тому +3

      infinity ♾

    • @MegaSolo83
      @MegaSolo83 2 роки тому +2

      😂😂

    • @FLS9083
      @FLS9083 2 роки тому

      I mean all this mess created by humans anyway universe doesn't know anything

    • @skullmastergamer
      @skullmastergamer 2 роки тому

      Since the time of the ancient Greeks, the philosophical nature of infinity was the subject of many discussions among philosophers. In the 17th century, with the introduction of the infinity symbol[1] and the infinitesimal calculus, mathematicians began to work with infinite series and what some mathematicians (including l'Hôpital and Bernoulli)[2] regarded as infinitely small quantities, but infinity continued to be associated with endless processes.[3] As mathematicians struggled with the foundation of calculus, it remained unclear whether infinity could be considered as a number or magnitude and, if so, how this could be done.[1] At the end of the 19th century, Georg Cantor enlarged the mathematical study of infinity by studying infinite sets and infinite numbers, showing that they can be of various sizes.[1][4] For example, if a line is viewed as the set of all of its points, their infinite number (i.e., the cardinality of the line) is larger than the number of integers.[5] In this usage, infinity is a mathematical concept, and infinite mathematical objects can be studied, manipulated, and used just like any other mathematical object.
      The mathematical concept of infinity refines and extends the old philosophical concept, in particular by introducing infinitely many different sizes of infinite sets. Among the axioms of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory, on which most of modern mathematics can be developed, is the axiom of infinity, which guarantees the existence of infinite sets.[1] The mathematical concept of infinity and the manipulation of infinite sets are used everywhere in mathematics, even in areas such as combinatorics that may seem to have nothing to do with them. For example, Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem implicitly relies on the existence of very large infinite sets[6] for solving a long-standing problem that is stated in terms of elementary arithmetic.
      Yes, I copied that off of Wikipedia

    • @mamacito1795
      @mamacito1795 2 роки тому

      @@skullmastergamer wow. Amazing that u gave me all that info and I STILL know nothing about infinity

  • @ahlpym
    @ahlpym 5 років тому +157

    I sometimes get a bit of amusement out of testing how various caculators respond to division by 0. Most just say "Error", but my favourite response has to be "MyScript Calculator", which uses hand-drawn symbols as input:
    The app recognises hand-drawn symbols and translates them to computer-written symbols, but when I write something like "0/0", it autocompletes to "0/(0+?)", as if the calculation is incomplete. Basically, the app just assumes that I'm not done writing the expression, and refuses to give any answer until I do. It makes the app seem so sassy.
    "Oh, you have a 0 in the denominator? Well, that doesn't make any sense, so you MUST not be finished writing yet. Go ahead and write some more. I'm waiting."

    • @user-ut7wi1if9q
      @user-ut7wi1if9q 5 років тому +3

      Love that

    • @HunterZx
      @HunterZx 5 років тому +5

      That's because of discrete maths, a computer can't divide by 0 (basically if you have the algorithm will go into an infinite loop, and the quotient will grow larger and larger until it exhausts all available memory and your computer is going to die), so basically it's a way to prevent an error and the destruction of your device haha

    • @Rick-od8oh
      @Rick-od8oh 5 років тому +1

      hilarious

    • @starfire_xi
      @starfire_xi 5 років тому +1

      Lol awesome

    • @winterrain1947
      @winterrain1947 5 років тому +1

      Sounds like your calculator is related to KITT

  • @vk4547
    @vk4547 2 роки тому +1

    For me it make sense if you write it differently, not “infinity = 1/0” but “0=1/infinity “ essentially the same but solves the problem with 1=2 cause there will be 2/infinity

  • @user-ul5pt1yb8z
    @user-ul5pt1yb8z 11 місяців тому

    Thanks a lot

  • @VikkuGoyal
    @VikkuGoyal 2 роки тому +278

    I did this in my school days, never thought someone will represent it in such a beautiful way.

  • @digitalfootballer9032
    @digitalfootballer9032 5 років тому +819

    Nothing can equal infinity, because infinity is not a number, but a concept. You can approach infinity, but you can't reach it because it isn't a real number.

    • @rixtrojan7833
      @rixtrojan7833 5 років тому +74

      say something new, 'cause my maths teacher has told me that infinite times

    • @indomtm4x100
      @indomtm4x100 5 років тому +18

      Infinite is a concept of how numbers wont stop or u can say forever

    • @1nkFalcon
      @1nkFalcon 5 років тому +1

      🤔

    • @adammalik6453
      @adammalik6453 5 років тому +5

      Steve infinity war

    • @shyshka_
      @shyshka_ 5 років тому +4

      Is math artificial, or part of nature?

  • @PrincePoison
    @PrincePoison Місяць тому

    Basically, the dividend is the Y on a graph and the divisor is the X. Since Y is the dependent variable, it can only change value if X changes value. If X changes and Y doesn’t, than that is okay (0/1=0) however if Y somehow changes without X, than the laws have been broken. Therefore 1/0 =0. The reason Y is the dividend and X is the divisor is because Rise/Run is the slope of a line. You can have a line with 0 slope, but not a line going straight up forever. It would be the same as just a dot.

  • @phil-gd6es
    @phil-gd6es 9 місяців тому

    Another issue with defining division by zero to be infinity involves rational functions where one side of the limit approaches infinity and the other side approaches negative infinity.

  • @shaozhe98
    @shaozhe98 6 років тому +514

    This is quite helpful for my engineering maths

    • @krishanu1729
      @krishanu1729 6 років тому +7

      Timothy Kong oh you young soul....

    • @thepunisher1665
      @thepunisher1665 6 років тому +9

      Timothy Kong how?

    • @mmukulkhedekar4752
      @mmukulkhedekar4752 6 років тому +2

      yeah how??...does it help???

    • @sgaxnikolaix661
      @sgaxnikolaix661 6 років тому +1

      Same fam... 4th year Mechanical Engineer with two minors in Renewable Energy and Mathematics

    • @24canidkasi
      @24canidkasi 6 років тому +3

      Not sure if bait, but limits of functions that divide by 0 are used everywhere in calculus, explicitly or not.

  • @sophiad1703
    @sophiad1703 2 роки тому +50

    “If you divide by zero, the universe explodes”
    -my math teacher, 2021

  • @vantranhai1986
    @vantranhai1986 23 дні тому

    1:51 reciprocal

  • @6611haggis
    @6611haggis 10 місяців тому

    The multiplicative inverse is also known as the reciprocal if I remember correctly.

  • @matrixphijr
    @matrixphijr 3 роки тому +724

    When he started talking about what multiplication and division _are,_ I thought he was going to touch on how if 2 x 5 = 10 and 10 ÷ 5 = 2, that means that if you add 2 five times, or have five groups of 2, you have 10, and if you separate 10 into 5 groups, you have 2 in each. So if you want to divide 10 by 0, that would be like saying you want to split 10 things into groups with 0 in them, and how many groups do you have? Or in reverse, how many groups of 0 things would it take to add up to 10? Well, neither one is physically possible.

    • @Llortnerof
      @Llortnerof 3 роки тому +95

      Physically possible is pretty irrelevant to math, though. That's something for physicists and engineers to worry about.
      You can define a math where dividing through 0 is possible. You're probably going to have to give up some other features the more common ones have, like the distributive property or multiplicative inverses, and it might not be terribly intuitive. But it is hardly impossible.
      Dividing by 0 isn't forbidden, it's just not defined in the default math most people learn.

    • @matrixphijr
      @matrixphijr 3 роки тому +22

      @@Llortnerof R/iamverysmart?
      Okay, but physicists and engineers _literally use math._ The reason math exists as it does is because of the world we live in. Universal constants in physics and astronomy were designed to allow us to mathematically calculate things we can't or don't have time or resources to study. And the results contribute to real-world projects.
      How do engineers build structures that can withstand hurricane force wind? Well, they have to calculate certain numbers and dimensions... with math. Force, vector, friction -- they're all real concepts translated into mathematical form in order to quantify them.
      Math does hold true because we made it that way. Sure, we could make it _not_ that way, but that wouldn't make much sense, literally or figuratively.
      So I really don't get the point of calling out my post by saying it's only one kind of math. Math is math. There's only one. If you wanted to "define a math" where other things are possible, that would mean changing math. Sure, you could say dividing by zero is possible, but when an apple falls from a tree, you wouldn't be able to calculate how long it takes to reach the ground.
      Also, when I say "physically possible," that's not the same as saying things are _impossible,_ just that they translate to real-world concepts. The square root of -1 is pretty impossible, but mathematicians still use it because it's useful in complex calculations. That's why there's a differentiation between those so-called "complex" numbers (some of which are real, some of which aren't) and just plain "real" numbers. Those are separate _branches_ of mathematics, if that's what you meant. I'm not really sure.

    • @Llortnerof
      @Llortnerof 3 роки тому +59

      ​@@matrixphijr You're still working in the realm of physicists and engineers, not math. Math is an entirely abstract, logical construct completely detached from physical reality.
      Your physical constants are merely how these things are represented in mathematical terms. They weren't devised so math could be used on them. They are the result of using math to describe these things.
      Math holds true because it is entirely based on logical conclusions from a set of predefined axioms.
      Defining a math does not mean "changing math". It means creating a new math. The regular math you're used to still exists besides it.
      Math is essentially a language. Defining a new math is similar to creating a new dialect.
      What you're calling "seperate branches" is all first semester university math. By second year a math student will already have dealt with maths way more complex than that and may well have built a simple one themself.
      And, uh... impossible literally means "not possible". So if you're saying something is not physically possible, you're saying it is physically impossible.

    • @matrixphijr
      @matrixphijr 3 роки тому +14

      @@Llortnerof It's no wonder you compare it to a language, since you're a master of twisting words.
      Look, I'm not having an argument about this. You realize you responded to a comment breaking down why 2 x 5 = 10 with a bunch of rambling nonsense about creating a new system of math where you can divide by zero? And frankly, my dude, there's a reason no one's done that already -- actually, two -- because it would have no bearing on reality and therefore no use whatsoever, and honestly, no one cares. To borrow your ideology, it would be like creating a language that no one speaks.

    • @Llortnerof
      @Llortnerof 3 роки тому +44

      @@matrixphijr All you're showing here is that you have a very limited understanding of math. Everything you're claiming is pointless? Has already been done, often multiple times, and at least once simply to show that it can be done.
      Including creating new languages nobody speaks. In fact, that's kinda the default for a newly created language since it is new and thus doesn't have any speakers yet. Hasn't stopped people from not only creating a propper grammar for, but also translating Shakespeare into its original Klingon.

  • @freddyspageticode
    @freddyspageticode 2 роки тому +131

    I like how much detail this goes into while still being concise

  • @daniel.sandberg.5298
    @daniel.sandberg.5298 3 місяці тому

    Division requires a legitimate amount of something. Since 0 is absent of content, such operation is dismissed by the arithmetic contradiction the number possess

  • @Zombito2014
    @Zombito2014 3 місяці тому

    BRO! INCREDIBLE

  • @awalkoflife6721
    @awalkoflife6721 Рік тому +1

    That's why you cook the brisket all at once, then slice it once cooked. Because 0 people shows up until it's cooked.

  • @HDSQ
    @HDSQ 6 років тому +295

    Suggested video title:
    How to disrupt the space-time continuum

  • @irm613
    @irm613 3 місяці тому +1

    If we have 1 cake and multiply it by 0, it means we made cacke disappear. If we divide 1 cake by 0 that means we divide cacke by nothing, we made division dissapear, defeating the whole purpose of dividing it. So its equasion that allways defeats its own purpose, its a non starter. Nothing happens if you divide by 0 because division can never start because it cancels itself.

  • @timisinoob
    @timisinoob Рік тому

    I actually searched for a video explaining this because I saw a quadratic equation in which 4 was taken common and below 0 so as to cancel 4. So what I thought was taking the quadratic below 0 but I realized my mistake.

  • @stewiegriffin12341
    @stewiegriffin12341 4 роки тому +762

    The female character has a hairpin that's shaped like the division sign.

    • @ranaahmad1461
      @ranaahmad1461 4 роки тому +17

      I thought it was a bandage....

    • @Aorkas
      @Aorkas 4 роки тому +26

      How dare you assume his/her/it/alloftheabove gender¿¿¿¿ #triggered

    • @darishdias
      @darishdias 4 роки тому +8

      Thats called detailed animation

    • @skydevil
      @skydevil 4 роки тому +18

      thats a cute little detail

    • @AB-hr4qg
      @AB-hr4qg 4 роки тому +17

      and the other scientist has hair that was divided by zero

  • @alial-mofadda9582
    @alial-mofadda9582 5 років тому +1041

    In Soviet Russia, zero divides by you

    • @deepaksinghairy7885
      @deepaksinghairy7885 5 років тому +59

      Zero divides by WE

    • @glanni
      @glanni 5 років тому +38

      @@deepaksinghairy7885 it's funny because everybody gets nothing

    • @deepaksinghairy7885
      @deepaksinghairy7885 5 років тому +9

      @@glanni not everyone We gets nothing

    • @glanni
      @glanni 5 років тому +4

      @@deepaksinghairy7885 please excuse my wrong use of words 🤣

    • @deepaksinghairy7885
      @deepaksinghairy7885 5 років тому +5

      @@glanni not my instead use Our

  • @HIMANSHUJOSHI-qw3rd
    @HIMANSHUJOSHI-qw3rd Рік тому +1

    SIR, CAN YOU PLEASE TELL ME WHICH SOFTWARE YOU HAVE USED IN THIS VIDEO.....

  • @dimerandomguy
    @dimerandomguy 9 днів тому

    Technically there should be an exception for when you do *x*/0, where everything gives you only zero. Now the real problem should be finding a way to add whichever thing we make equal to *x*/0

  • @justsomerandomperson
    @justsomerandomperson 6 років тому +806

    *My mind hurts.*

    • @AndrewVaughanOfficial
      @AndrewVaughanOfficial 6 років тому +33

      Just Some Random Person not possible, your brain has no pain receptors. You're just formulating a negative reaction to a concept you don't want to put time to fully comprehend.

    • @maulichikoch6979
      @maulichikoch6979 6 років тому +20

      Andrew Vaughan I think your trying to be funny but at the same time I think you're serious

    • @AndrewVaughanOfficial
      @AndrewVaughanOfficial 6 років тому +7

      Yes.

    • @sweetheartokay69
      @sweetheartokay69 6 років тому

      Just Some Random Person mine too

    • @arandomperson7591
      @arandomperson7591 6 років тому

      I found a video that hurts your brain even more.
      ua-cam.com/video/emlcwyvnsg0/v-deo.html
      and involves 0 and infinity