Don't Let Ignorant CEOs Ruin Your Future (Coding Advice You Need)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 бер 2024
- Is AI really a threat to the next generation of coders? NVIDIA's CEO thinks so.
Speaking at the World Government Summit in Dubai, Jensen Huang, NVIDIA CEO, boldly stated: "Everybody in the world is now a programmer. This is the miracle of artificial intelligence." He believes learning to code may become obsolete as AI advances.
My take? Generative AI will NOT replace programmers. Anyone who's built real enterprise software understands the complexities involved. Asking tools like ChatGPT for code snippets isn't the same as architecting the software that runs our world.
What are your thoughts?
#coding #chatgpt #ai
He doesn’t believe it. He wants the people he’s selling to believe it.
And what are you expecting from the men who is selling their Courses? 😂
AI is the future and people who know how to code can jump into AI more easily than others.
Ai is only useful to people who can actually code, write, draw etc. Unless you create "content" lol oh my God "content" imagine being a "content creator" hahaha.
The more you use their tools the more likely hood you will be training it to do your job.
Everyone should learn how to program but not everyone should learn how to code
Saying that you don't need to learn coding, because AI will do it for you is like saying that you don't need to learn math, because there will be calculators in the future
Well said! Great analogy!
@@programmingwithmosh What are your views regarding Devin AI?
I think it may be more and more like natural languages programming.BUT the world still needs logic design and architecture design.
Spot on!
Oh yeah, they say it completed Jobs on Upwork
@@ronjobs2359
Glad someone as reputable as you is saying this. The AI hype train needs a reality check.
Humans are irreplaceable for a long time.
Nah.
I tried to learn coding. 100+ hours.
Hopeless so I gave up.
Asked chat gpt, and now i got 5 apps that my workplace paid for and use daily.
So to summarize: already chat gpt is better than a 100+ hours trainee.
AI has barely touched the world. Imagine when it takes all its current learning and applies it. And next version. And next.
To believe that AI cannot replace humans writing Computer language is as likely as to believe Jesus will drop down with a fix for your personal bankruptcy when you spend it all on gambling😂
Never coded before. Now i have hundreds in lines in code for personal software and macros. General architecture and problem solving will still be needed.
Probably true, but don't forget that Nvidia is business (Big business) and they're selling something, they can say wtv they want to make you buy it
Mosh yt channel in danger 😢
Ask him to fire all developers in nvidia and write his graphics card drivers using AI
Bruh😂😂
My thoughts exactly. It'd definitely be a great disaster
someday he will
I asked AI a leetcode problem it hadn't been trained on since I modified it with a few spins and it failed miserably. Meanwhile I had a solution I personally tested and it worked. Ai is a dummy.
@@user-qm7tl2xm8s AI can solve problem which we already know and repetitive. It cant innovate or custom build software. It cannot attach software pieces together to make meaningful system to work for humans.
“AI is a tool, not a replacement”. Well said and So true. Thank you Mosh.
Wrong. It is a replacement. This video is just cope.
correct for now, but probably not for long.
So naive
"Don't learn to read, or write, or think, just use Google Lens"
"Don't learn to use pen and paper, just buy my keyboard"
"Don't learn to type on the keyboard, just use voice typing"
"Be stupid enough so you are completely lost without our product!"
Literally the face of industry....😂
Truer words have never been spoken.
Huang is an electrical engineer that has basically only worked for Nvidia (well, ok, co-founded) but he isn't invested in the greater software world or the people He is invested in Nvidia. And Nvidia is dumping literally all their money into AI so guess what he is gonna push...
Also, I appreciate Mosh take on this!!
And Jensen will be proven right.😂😂😂
AI will not replace devs, only assist them. Any senior knows this. Its like thinking that 3D printing will replace construction workers. Simply foolish to anyone with a bit of experience
@@qscmplx Im not basing my assumption on the current state of AI. Im basing it on the reality of what the developers job consists of.
You see, the quality of software lies solely in the definition of requirements. Which is a dynamic, living list. AI's do not em or deploy software development protocols or adhere to company guidelines.
You are still in the fantasy bubble of AI, anyone with a lick of knowledge of how they actually work knows that theyre far inferior than people make them seem.
They are pretty dumb when you get down to it.
@@jlf120you do know technological development grows exponentially,so we might never know...
3d printing and other new construction machinery will indeed replace construction workers. Like calculators replaced manual calculation workers so will ai replace low level coding jobs. Only problem solving skills will remain valuable. Coding jobs will be more accessible to people in other more problem solving intensive fields like mathematics and physics and some other kinds of engineering hence resulting in great decline in coding specific skills but increase in demand for problem solving skills in general. There might remain no career with only coding specific skills.
Tho I think that even problem solving will be automated and become human independent in enough time (like 30 years or so) .
The 3D printing analogy is actually spot on! I’ve seen a lot of more junior devs say that it will easily replace programmers and that is true from their perspective, but if you have worked on any large scale or complex system you will definitely know we’re no where near being able to replace competent senior engineers. Just like we’re no where near being able to 3D print the Empire State Building.
@@sidbarrack7938We can't 3d print the empire state building yet, but we already can build multi level buildings with 3d printing. It only improves every year. Give 3d printing and ai 5-10 years
First of all he is a sales man.
A salesman that led a company to perfectly transition from gaming to workstations to cloud compute to web3 to AI? I'm sure he's "just" a salesman and the uploader of this channel who literally sells courses about programming totally isn't one🤣
@@nigel-uno He didn't say it wrong though, He is a sales man at first and then one who thinks analytically to guide the company, Guiding and doing stuff yourself has alot of difference in there bro.
@@Mr.Scopesike What was there to sell before Jensen led the team to create it? He's clearly not a salesman first.
its just that 10 years ago everybody was saying we need more programmers, not that its not true - we still need developers but the need for a junior programmer is non existent even at this point
how is it non existent
Without being a junior developer how can one become a senior developer directly without experience? 😅
@@swanandpatil9675 yeah, seems like the problem for humans at the moment
AI can do all the simple codes now.
@@swanandpatil9675 Yeah, Literally...
Programmers are in a lot of trouble.
Its amazing how naive the creator is. These models are getting better every day, if you cant see whats coming then you might deserve whats heading your way.
@@irql2 but you are aware it is going to apply to EVERYTHING, not only programmers, right?
CEOs are managers, business men, relationship builders between companies, don't forget that.
Thank you sir for your opinions
It really boosted my passion more
Since I heard from that CEO,it got me rethinking my career ,but hearing from you just reassured me to keep pushing
I think this CEO should be more concerned that experienced developers using AI as a tool are very likely to make himself irrelevant. With AI as a tool it is more easy than ever before to become a successful solo entrepreneur. And just think about it - if everybody will be using AI, who will have more advantage in software market - CEO with some basic understanding in programming or professional programmer with years of practical experience?
Well said@@ingarskrafts3813
@@ingarskrafts3813
Don’t kid yourself. A rich corporation with AI is a monster that eats everything.
Wow, i would love to see more shorts like this mosh, very impressive and useful 🎉
More to come!
he tries to say please don't stop buying my courses, everyone sells to you miserable guys
People - AI will never replace program developers.
Near future- AI brilliantly write frontend and backend code programs and comunicate with customer with a natural language.
After loosing all the hope, got some motivation from this video. Thank you Mosh ❤
Keep learning and thanks for teaching us brother 👍
The only time humans won't need to learn coding is if the concept of computers ceased existence. Coding is also an art form in certain circles. There isn't a possibility of coding going away. Not to mention the big elephant in the room... Code is AI; AI is code
as a senior developer in top 10 semiconductor company, i can say that our CIO sees AI as a tool to increase efficiency and he will not let AI do the critical decisions. A mistake in IT applications can cause millions of dollars is just a matter of hours.
Absolutely agree Mosh. I'm a full stack dev of 5 years and there are far far too many things in the creation of software that an AI would simply not be able to do. They can't architect and re-architect software, configure cloud features, or modify software upon a customers new feature request. It can't understand the requirements of a business and create of modify software to the level that humans or a business needs. It really is just a helper tool to speed up development - We may find in the future software becomes much faster to create, due to these helpful AI tools... but replacing software engineers? No chance. Not at least for a VERY long time yet.
will know in a few years
Have you looked at Devins? There are now agents that can do architecture and design. Software coding will be much more impacted than we think
You are ignorant on how fast AI is progressing
AI is growing exponentially. Once taught, AI can co everything you’ve mentioned much more efficiently and errors free. Can’t say that about human coders 😂
❤ I love your heartening comment here, I only dabble at code, it's delightful to hear you reassure and respect the coder. ❤
Mosh also wants his UA-cam channel to be running, of course he is speaking this to keep his audience engaged on channel.
You think a person selling courses would say you need to worry about cs jobs in the future? LOL cmon
"AI is a tool, not a replacement" thanks Mosh
I used to think Jensen was wrong because in enterprise software development which is a very human process-mapped activity with many regulated and unremovable human checks and balances, that development lifecycle would never change. But I must say with GPT 4o now, I'm not too sure anymore. If you could include GPT 4o live in your R&D meetings - just imagine this - GPT 4o could immediately draw up prototypes on the spot when you discuss about it (and share it in the teams meetings - where business analysts can work in tandem to comment and correct the understanding if it was wrong), and if its inferencing capabilities lets it understand business and human processes and then have it design the ERD diagram, create the functional & tech specifications, generate a few UI/UX themes for humans to choose from, and upon approval by a project manager, generate the entire codebase according to the approved specs. We as coders might be toast. I think this is what Jensen is talking about. I think the "AI is a tool argument" might really be 99% AI and 1% human. The coder will be completely replaced, and the only human remaining in this loop will be the non-technical business analyst.
indeed. He said that the world will need people able to solve domain problems
can you elaborate on this matter perhaps on a complete video? it would be nice to hear some real world examples that ai may come short, atleast for the near future.
AI comes short in everything. It sucks, all it can do is snippets. Its literally like saying 3D printing will replace construction workers. No, just no. You can 3D print a door handle yes but not an entire house.
The same goes for AI and code.
@@BRIANROSERhaha! Love your 3D printing metaphor! Spot on!
@@BRIANROSERI understand that it cannot perform on levels of designing a complete software on its own, what i was wondering is that in the near future perhaps 10 years from now, can AI evolve to join those snippets to actually design software? what are some factors that locks out ai to interfere multiple careers in software engineering? maybe creativity?
For me i think what it can't do yet is learn the full context of a project , like it can build you ui of a page and stuff but it can't fully develop and continuously innovate and update , design new solutions for your oroject thats why we still need humans
@@hossein4903It’s difficult to predict things in the future. Sometimes predictions are right but sometimes they are wrong.
We just have to remember that these predictions are not in our control. So, if by any chance, you are paralyzed by the fear of what the future holds just remember to take it day by day and focus on things you can control.
Bonus points if you can position yourself to understand and learn AI architecture, how to prompt engineer or other new tools you will have to learn to keep yourself competitive in the workforce.
Don't teach your children how to write, they can just dictate to a AI and it transform it in text.
Bro your channel is based on programming ofcourse u will be pissed from new revolution.
I love you mosh! You taught me python years ago and now I am about to graduate with my cs degree. This video relieved a bunch of stress around ai
It's so soothing to hear this from you.. Thank you Mosh... Now I'm motivated to take coding seriously again
I was literally waiting for someone like you to speak on this Mosh.....Thank you so much
To be fair, he’s saying it will replace coders in THE FUTURE.
How far in the future is open for debate, but it can definitely write good basic functions right now.
At the speed it’s moving, it might be able to write full scripts within a few years.
After that, full programs.
I think coders have a good 5 to 10yrs before having to be legitimately worried.
Thanks for the assurance.
Dude, are you up to date with the latest AI development in code generation? It's not about just generating a simple code snippet anymore. AI is definitely gonna replace a lot of developers (i'm a dev myself).
Don't worry, in future, company no need to have a CEO. Because CEO job can be done by A.I. Just ask A.I about what future plan for a company. The A.I will answer for it. ✌🏻😁
Thank you Mosh! you nailed it! It is a problem solving tool not a replacment! stay safe!
Devs are in denial. Dev content creators are defending their revenues. Remember: the greatest skill that any life form on Earth can have is adaptability.
Are you a developer? If you are then you know what he's saying is true. You have to sit down with users and understand their business problem and turn it into a technical solution. It's going to be a long time before an ai can have conversations with users and understand their needs. But ai will be a tool used by developers to write code more quickly and test code quickly.
@@GizmoMaltese AI will be able to do all of this but you will not even be able to understand its code. Predictions in this field are spot on. We will be coding inplain English. And therefore everyone will be able to do it. After some time we will not even be required. I am in the middle of this stuff and believe me. I already see the end of my coding career.
@@GizmoMaltese i see you are still in denial the reality is every new version of AI is becoming better and better, by the time we reach 2030 AI could replace most programmers.
Sounds like you have been drinking the Kool-Aid. Adaptability is only good if you adapt because it makes your life better not because it makes some company or government’s life better. Like when they dump, central bank, digital currency is on the population. I am going to resist them because I know this is the vehicle they were going to use to try to make me a slave. I will deal with them in the exact same way I would deal with someone trying to pull me into a van or boat. I will win.
Not really. There's just a lot more that goes on when it comes to engineering a solution than people think. I like ChatGPT, but if you sit down and ask it to architect a system with increasing complexity it falls off hard. Moreover, it can't remember enough of what is previously mentioned to iterate, refine, deploy, and maintain a solution.
It doesn't go back and re-assess work in order to ensure an entire application should work as intended. Until AI can do this autonomously it will remain a tool and not a serious threat to the software engineering profession.
I'm sure it will remain the masturbatory fantasy of managers everywhere though. That wonderful day when they can fire all of their engineers and just have computers do their job lol.
Thank You for this video. I’m just starting to learn coding and so far it’s going very well. Then I hear this particular CEOs say coding is a waste of time and AI will replace it. Now that I know this, I’m going to keep coding!😊
My brother told me I shouldn’t have my kids study language because they’re a technologies that can translate through earpieces now. Learning language develops your brain learning how to code develops your brain. It is a good exercise in the same way that lifting weights develops your muscles. What else are you going to do with your time Might as well better yourselves. Of course, in 100 years we could be back to the Stone Age and those language skills might kick in again. You don’t know what tomorrow brings even though you think you do do you think any of these businessman or the people on 9/11 that jumped out of those buildings and vision themselves in those situations Before hand? Today is great. Tomorrow is not guaranteed. I know guys who made them selves, millionaires, saving for retirement and died of cancer before they could retire. Today is grace tomorrow is not guaranteed.
This will age very badly.
I’m too lazy to write any comments usually. But Node took a special place in my heart, it was my first commercial experience back in 2016-2019, and I miss working with Node sometimes.
My perspective on this, as I’ve tried learning to code on python and C++, is that I need to learn problem solving more than understanding the syntax.
I genuinely believe that with the advancement of AI, we will need to adapt and how this looks like is learning to think in systematic ways and creative problem solving, and letting AI solve the nitty gritty and focus on the syntax. Maybe if I learn coding at a conceptual level and know why something works, I can better interact with the code and AI to solve specific problems and give better and laser targeted prompts to solve specific problems.
So in other words what I’m proposing is that we start learning and thinking in systems, a more holistic and higher level approach, that will allow us to dedicate more time to the creative side of development rather than worrying about the technical aspects of programming…
I’m happy to hear what others think.
Coding is not dead. It's just become heavily abstracted by the early programmers. Ai as a tool being one of them.
But coding is dying for new devs, because it is getting exponentially more difficult to land a job. New tools everywhere and companies are expecting too much. Employeers need to realize that leetcode is dead. That is exactly what the bot is better at. And you can't fault new programmers for using a tool that was created by the early programmers themselves, for the purpose and sake of abstraction.
Never lose, Never choose too.
we will see after 20-30 years...
and we will see who is laughing then
We will only see a more or less clear answer after the "AI bubble" pops and the dust settles. But having some experience in software development, I can definitely say that creating a working piece of even mildly complex software by writing a prompt is way less possible than some people seem to think it is.
Project Devin
@@chronometer9931 still not good enough to replace a proper developer for any moderately complex tasks. Whether it ever will be, and whether it will ever be widely adopted we'll know when the dust settles.
Well it depends, as a senior engineer, yeah, but junior devs who are looking to get hired... yeah, a lot of tech companies are shedding workers mostly because the senior devs can now do the work of 3 senior devs from before chatgpt, no need to have juniors anymore.
government should subsidize a few all humans devs companies, if only to keep coding skills still alive in the country, similar to how the US preserved part of it's manufacturing capabilities.
I have 5 years of full-stack experience. I was shocked when heard what he said it. A few other AI experts were also so futuristic. But I will keep grinding! I feel the fear but being replaced does not make all the sense.
My teacher told me I wouldn’t be able to walk around with a calculator in my pocket when I was younger…..boy was she wrong
It's actually true. While AI won't entirely replace coders, it does make coding faster, leading to a reduced need for as many coders over time. Ultimately, this could result in a smaller coder workforce, in my opinion.
It also means that development will be less expensive for small companies, so they can start their development and that can lead to more work places for programmers
Thanks for the motivation Mosh ❤
I just get into entreprise software development for a couple months and i totally agree
I really appreciate this reels. Thank you for giving courage for those who want to pursue careers in this IT field. 😍😍
AI is going to replace programmers. Mosh is just trying to earn money till that time
Was watching this while implementing a PIL based visiting card creator automated through an Excel reader,, Thanks mosh.
I wonder if the original signers ancestors to Yusei and the others dueled these, due to their Aztec inspiration, as they were of that civilization.
That's the ostrich reflex right here.... Just look what Devin is doing today.... Multiple agents will definitely start taking some jobs over.
Yeah definitely ostrich reflex. Imagine yourself in their shoes and it is understandable, all those years they put in. I am sure a bunch of horse guys were the same with the advent of the automobile.
Devin is dogshit and while it might take a couple of super light entry level jobs, it's miles away from even removing a single software engineer.
Scaling, security, performable, legacy and more will never be close to as good via tools like Devin.
You can't use AI to create new systems when the AI is only taught precious knowledge.
Sorry but this analysis is stupid, Jensen Huang is the number 1 person to know the future better than anyone else.
He's developing the hardware on top of which things like operating system, applications etc sit.
He's already seen in my opinion that they can build ai and programmable logic in the hardware itself.
Last century they said the same about horses getting replaced with cars....you haven't understood Alan Turing's paper
That's not a great analogy is it.
Probably one of the appropriate feedback to Jensen saying.
I'm afraid this is not a strong argument. You're opining on current AIs while he was talking about future advanced models. They will most certainly be a replacement in the future. As for qualifications, he is highly knowledgeable in AI and what he says on that topic matters a lot.
Yup, that only happened in the SkyNet era someday, not now😅
Thank you so much Mosh
Jensen Huang is talking about a future AGI, not talking about the current Narrow AI.
* off penis
Future agi is basically a few short yeard away. Yall are so naive
AGI = AI = Curve Fitting
What should that ai be based off? So far they have LLMs and that's it, so if there is nothing else on the horizon then there will be no AGI.
Wake up guys. This guy doesn't give any evidence that AI will not be able to achieve all of that in the next month. Dude is desperately attacking Jensen personally, because, well, he is desperate; and who's going to buy his courses if all is about the quit coding?
It's not important that you must need to code, but it's important that you must use your brain and trust nobody for nothing.
Some fools don't know that his courses are the best in the world. I'll pay you when Facebook, Google and Amazon and Microsoft started hiring AI developers instead of human developers to work with their complex systems. Mosh Hamedani is a great and most talented teacher who gives real information and advices.
@@UniqueEdit243 I don't remember saying anything about his talent as a teacher?
@@grabsmench Do you even have a talent like him. He is giving the right advice to his students and new learners of programming from giving up their dreams. That's what the great teachers do.
@@UniqueEdit243You sound like a bot from India, you don't even know what you're talking about...
@@UniqueEdit243
actually, he is just trying to keep his business afloat. If everyone believes that there is no future in coding due to the advancement of AI, then he will out of business 😂
On the flip side, he must know where the chip technology is heading. Just the way transformer models changed our content generation 24 months back, same must be in the hardware realm.
I almost give up but mosh words made stands strong, thank you mosh
Irresponsible.
Nvidia s CEO doesn't know the future, he makes the future.
Not now, but in the future you cannot compete with AI so no point starting now to learn coding for a developer career.
AI is indeed a tool but in the hands of the end user. The middlmen will be replaced.
He's just a boomer.
Huang's argument:
"I wish young people a lot of suffering, because tenacity and resilience come with suffering."
Never would I wish my peers any suffering...
To the wise owl that made the video you must live under a rock.
I feel a lot more inspired now 🎉
Thank you Mosh
"AI is a tool, not a replacement" say this to truckers and bus drivers in 10 years :>
more like 50, those industries and their dependencies are heavily regulated and therefore very slow to adapt to developments
@@RomeTWguy nope, its a big market, and it will not be the current car companies that will solve it, it will be nvida and such companies
@@RomeTWguyhave you heard of these people called lobbyists?
The legal complexities of the system actually stand a pretty good chance of keeping them employed, companies are too afraid to be held liable by self-driving mistakes.
Let’s see how this will age in 20 years or less…
What he said, developing software may not be the same as how we do now. In the future AI sits between software and developer. And code will not be the medium.
That is a much better argument. Still pretty sure the guy that knows how to code. He’s going to get the job just like the guy who drove horses became the chauffeur. The correct term for someone that pilots a car watercraft or aircraft is a pilot. Yet those who drive trucks and cars are referred to as drivers even though they never drove an animal. So don’t tell me the guy with the coding skills isn’t getting first dibs at that job.
@@SeanEustace-zk3mc fair enough
@@SeanEustace-zk3mcIt's the same argument, It's just that he actually thought it through and explained it. What you fail to understand is that what jobs remain are going to become a serious competition, because we will have a lot of capable people, but they will have to compete for fewer positions...
After all, AI don't build themselves✊
I am afraid that they can
They are getting there, fast. If GAI is achieved then it’s game over
developers, developers, dewelo-pers ,develo-per developers... ( till shirt gets sweat)
Thanks Mosh for this inspiring short
Very much agreed. Although I can't write a single line of code and Ai is bloody amazing, its still a complementary to human capacity and not yet an Agi to replace anything and everything
Dude calls NVIDIA's CEO ignorant but can't tell apart Adobe Illustrator icon and AI, while making an argument basically made out of personal attack.
Not only NVIDIA CEO, but NVIDIA is a AI company now, so I don't think it is hype. Sure you can say Jensen might be hyping it, but it is only hype until the AI comes out and take your coding job away. I am sure all those horse guys thought the car was all hype until it came out lol.
@@rodney5269 Cars still need mechanics to fix them. Similarly, you can ask AI to build you a full stack website, but as soon as you want to make custom changes to it, or it doesn't work as intended, you're going to need someone knowledgeable to dig in the code. You could try and ask AI over and over again to make you better code, but you will eventually need to have knowledge of web design to ask the right questions to get to the right answers.
@@cryora Yea, but where you needed like 10 on a project can probably be accomplished with 4-5 with AI. AI will take jobs away and increase competition for the remaining jobs. Sort of like bank tellers, they are still around, nothing like it used to be when there were like 9-10 for a busy bank , now there are only 2 at most. And the competition for those few positions are tough.
@@rodneyh1947 They'll also create new jobs and businesses, because it becomes easier for solo developers to produce and small businesses can operate without having to pay as many people. The thing to worry about is how it might get monopolized so that it only benefits the few.
@@cryora It will take away jobs more than create. Going to be a net loss.
I’m playing devil’s advocate. I think his statement is misinterpreted on an emotional level. He projected a reduced need for needing to learn code, but that’s not synonymous with what you actually are - problem solvers and engineers. A coding language is simply a way to get from problem to solution. It’s like a 1960s finance auditor with a briefcase full of calculators, formulas and spreadsheets which were needed to manipulate numbers. Now we have Excel. I don’t need to remember how to calculate 100 formulas to calculate things, Excel does it for me, so that I can do my job more efficiently. There will always be a need for people who can assess a problem and come up with a solution, but instead of writing the code yourself, you’ll have AI do it exponentially faster then tweak it as needed, through natural language until you get your desired solution.
I trust you because you taught me JS and python, I just hope I break into this industry
The full stack is insecure; BROKEN. The lower levels needs more laborers. Everything must be rebuilt. The workers are too few. Esp in the west
On the other hand..this sounds like gas car makers saying that Musk is idiotic and getting fellow gas car makers to pat each other's back.
Thank you, I really needed that
You don't need to learn assembly language which used to be in past, bcoz we have a whole environment for that nowadays. Same for some programming languages today.
such a positive and clear adhesive message, thanks
We will believe those ceo's only when their company will run on only AI based employees😅 (because cuda utility-drivers was only written by humans 😮)
Then you're short-sighted and will only see after the fact...
This is my passion, i will keep going no matter what
You should do it because it's fun. Building things is fun. Software is just one way of building things.
The barrier to entry of coding lowered so $$$ might be less
So, we don’t believe this guy who is the CEO of a 2 trillion dollar company, and we should believe you, a UA-camr whose content is all about teaching programming?
and a youtuber who is financially incentivized (not that its malacious) to advocate against these narratives.
Yeah, because the CEO is trying to hype his product. He's claiming his elixir will cure all your ailments. Ai will be a powerful tool but it's a long time before ai can meet with users, understand their problems, and design solutions that meet their needs.
@@GizmoMaltese 👍
copium huffers in comments huffing copium. "theyre just a saleman bro like so what theyre only selling specialized logic board to help thr compute for humanity's greatest achievement to date, so what, just a salesman bro"
The CEO is just a salesman trying to sell his product. You know how sales people hustle you right?
You shouldn’t believe the CEO billionaire ever since I could make an hour long video of CEO’s, investors, and other rich people lying to the public in order to dump the stock to drive the price down so they can buy it up. Like the guy that told everyone they were getting out of all the hotels right before Covid happen the stock dumped and they bought up all the shares. Rich people also believe stupid things that technologist of bad morals keep telling them they don’t really understand the technology to the greed that the dead technologist do and they have all sorts of squishy ideas in their heads. They are literally billionaires dumping money into cures for death as we speak and people talking about it as if it’s a dead serious thing. I guess what else are you going to do with your money since you could never even spend the interest on it unless you were just spending in order to spend it. these people have built themselves up on their pride and think that they can overcome death. This is not a new argument. Of course it goes back to Gilgamesh.
yeah, Jensen is not your friend, guys. He is a typical modern big-corpo CEO, thinking only about what kind of lies and bs he has to push, to get enough hype - for his bonus check and retirement benefits.
What he is saying is conceptually wrong (and there is a reason why he is pushing this to an audience that can`t even argue with him).
The main reason software development is quite a robust field - is because it is a field with a constant "work in progress" dynamics. It is a young field, with tons of stuff to improve.
Switching to AI would mean, that we are freezing ourselves in space and time, accepting the fact, that we stop improving, stop working on safety issues, stop optimizing, basically, that we say, that current codebase is some sort of golden standard and there is nothing left to do. Which is completely wild and absurd thing to say, for anyone, who is not hyping up his company`s stocks.
To advance, you need ppl who understand how it works under the hood.
Using AI with you human language communication, means that you are abstracting to the highest level possidle.
It means, that you giving up on literally every form of control and customization, and just hoping that you won`t need to change anything. It is a highest form of "copy-pasting" :D
Now, it is nothing new in programming, after all, we all use frameworks and libs, and compilers etc to abstract things - but it already comes with significant cost. And we already know, that the best products are made by ppl who , if needed, can avoid mindless abstraction and "coping", and go "deep" and customize things.
Your average Joe who uses pre-built website will never look under the hood to understand what is going on, and will have no idea on how to fix anything.
Same happens if AI gives you a code, that does not work. You literally have to learn to code, to fix it or to identify problem or dangerous practice being used there.
So, the moment you stop improving - AI starts to stagnate.
The moment you stop filling internet with terabytes of code with better solutions, with newer stuff, new patches and updates, AI will be frozen in time.
AI is a tool that will reduce coding repeatable boring code. It’s the next level “intellisense” 😊
I never liked AI at all. But we must face the fact it changed the style of living and working like no other technology so far in insane short period of time. And that's a terrified fact. AI should have stayed behind the door for special purposes, closed systems, military, police,... but not widely opened for everyone. Not just because someone will lose his job but it will dramatically change everything. And definitely will replace programmers more or less in the very near future. A man made a new being on the already destroyed planet. A man again plays the role of the God.
AMEN!!!
I learned so much from this video. Thank you!
be like this man, learn sales !
they should focus on making a.i the perfect teacher, tutor which can easily teach anyone even the most complex topics. it starts at the education level, imagine you had an a.i who can teach you human anatomy within weeks compared to years and make it stick. then you'd have enough professionals.
Quantum Computers + AI =💀
Yeah everybody just think about their benefit
You may be right. But also he can because as CEO he know potential about staff which are not shared publiclly or see potential super fast grow of potential in next years. But everything can be only guess.
I thought, in truth, AI would provide a new kind of RAD tool. That is something that saves time and boilerplate, but doesn't replace a dev. AI could be harnessed into a dashboard; an AI assisted executive mgmt system. You could, in fact, replace a data analyst with this. Carve 100 analysts down to 10. Infiltrate a fast track into the backend that accesses the data warehouse. A dashboard that not only provides data, but helps a director make decisions and take action. Data analysts do use a lot of boilerplate. It's been done before, and the pipeline is heavy weighted and costly.