Now launching 2023 originally scheduled to launch in 2008. I say scap the bondoggle use its parts for other mission and get then next gen Webb telescope up there. It is scheduled to launch 2025 anyway what is an extra 2 years to get the next, next gen T-scope up into space? Webb's technology and programming is already been obsolete since 2012.
@@Shaden0040 I know, surprised Congress hasn't cut their losses and canceled it at this point like they did for the SSC after spending $2B, and that was only a $10B estimated total price, same as the Webb at this point. If it reaches about $20B it will cost more than the SSC even as a % of GDP at the time.
@@sipsofhell9018 it doesn't jump around. It's compilation video of lots of older videos. Some from as far back as 2016 or 2017. It even says it's a compilation video in the title.
My college biology professor , in 85 ,said that the only areas that there was no life on earth were , the deepest part of the ocean, in Volcanos and in heavily radioactive areas . Since then , we have found life forms that live in all of those areas . Something to think of when we talk about life
@@semaj_5022 I think Caitlin is generally liked by audience :) I must admit I didn't like her at the beginning, but she really won me over very quickly by her enthusiasm and energy. In my opinion Scishow space got the best hosts in general :)
@@RickMason-yj7pv Space can easily provide something to do the job. Weather it were to hit the planet at a good time for it or not it is the real question.
Eyeball planet doesn't mean it's not spinning. It's just means it's spinning at basically the same rate it encircles it's parent star. So closer you'd need to spin faster. Also if planets are layered like we think only the molten metal core should need to spin for sufficiently large enough magnetic fields
Perhaps gravitational pull from a nearby planet also orbiting the star and the star itself might stir the planet’s innards enough to generate a magnetic field.
Caitlin, I hope you see this - my nine-year-old daughter is a big fan of yours. "She's like ME! She's happy and excited and loves science and cute things, and she's ADORABLE!"
Probably could, though - given the greater cosmic abundance of water than of ammonia - my money is more on some water-ammonia mixture rather than pure ammonia. I wouldn't be surprised if water-ammonia worlds are as common as water worlds such as our own!
The sun will not get hotter as it becomes a red giant, but that the Earth will get hotter as the sun's photosphere and chorona will get closer to the Earth. In fact ,the sun will get cooler, hence its color changing from yellow to orange then to red as it expands and cools.
It gets about 1% hotter every 100M years. While the average surface temp will be lower making it red it will far more than make up for that with surface area (helium fusion is 2x more energetic that hydrogen and since the core at that point is even more dense it fuses that 100's of times faster than now, that extra energy isn't going to make the sun cooler overall). In 7.6B years it will be big enough to swallow the Earth and even well before that (~1B years) Earth will receive 3000x more heat and light that it does now = enough to make it a molten lava ball. Long before that though in 600m years (6% hotter than now, equaling about 150-160F average temp) the heat will be enough to remove all CO2 from air (putting it in rocks, so plants starve) and over time UV will crack apart all water with the hydrogen lost to space = still fucked, and sooner.
24.50 is that why we are so interested in mars. One day it will be in the perfect position as the habitable zone reaches out past earth and the only place we can run to.
Rogue planet habitant watching some science news: "we are so lucky to be living in this planet, we might the only living things. According to recent research, it may almost impossible to live near a star due to its extreme condition. But theoretically it possible.
What about a cold planet with below 0C temperatures on the surface, but have an internal heat source keeping the water and soil jest below the frozen surface habitable? The internal heat source could be tidally induced by a companion, or due to radioactive decay
They kind of suggested that. They mentioned Jupiter's moon "Titan" which was probably meant to be Europa, and it has a similar situation to the one you are suggesting. It has even been looked at for a place to colonize someday.
No circadian rythm wasn't that Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan problem 🙄 and studio 54 anyone" who likes the night life " "who likes to boogie" " out on the dance 💃 floor woh oh yeah" 😎 am I wrong? Lol 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂
Question: if we ever do find a super habitable planet and decide to move humanity there on a nice galactic road trip, would it be better for us to take the scenic route and take a little longer so we give ourselves more time to prepare for the changes in gravity and such? Assuming we have the technology to simulate gravity by that point in time I think a slower trip would allow us to condition the humans on board on a more biological standpoint for the double gravity that they'd be dealing with on this "New Eden" allowing them a better chance of survival and adaptation upon arrival. What do you think?
Worth noting that a study on the TRAPPIST-1 system came out a few years ago that modeled what would happen if any of the HZ planets had magnetic fields, i.e. would they help preserve the planets' atmospheres against repeated flares at close range. The answer was quite the opposite: with a system that compact, the magnetic field lines for each planet would couple to those of the star, efficiently funneling even more radiation down onto the planets and accelerating the loss of their atmospheres. TRAPPIST-1's magnetic field strength isn't known, but taking an average value from similarly-aged red dwarfs whose magnetic fields have been measured, the planets would be expected to lose the equivalent of all of Earth's atmosphere in about 1 billion years.
Yes that was a false statement, most cave animals are also cathemeral, meaning they sleep at random times regardless of the solar cycles. So demonstratively, not ALL animals follow the circadian rhythm.
I wonder if ammonia or methane based life could be silicon based? Silicon compound doesn’t do well in water but idk what reaction it would have with methane and ammonia respectively
It's possible, particularly subsurface on other terrestrial bodies. Unfortunately it most likely wouldn't be more complex than just microbes and bacteria. But still pretty cool.
Life can create it's own heat, and cleave ice, why does the water have to be liquid in the environment? Why can't it be frozen, why can't it be gaseous? We already know cells can survive at pressure extremes
Because it would be unlikely for cells to form in the first place without liquid water as a medium for chemical reactions. Water is just extremely convenient for organic chemistry, it plays like 5 roles at once.
I agree with William Cruz but would like to add one thing. Most life on Earth that exist in extreme environments, extremophiles, tardigrades and whatnot, adapted to live in those places. They didn't poof into existence in extreme environs, they formed in temperate water like everything else and evolved slowly over millions of years.
It doesn't have to spin. The core just has to rotate within it and that can be done with convection currents. Also, eyeball planets do spin, otherwise they wouldn't be eyeball planets. They just spin once in their year. An example would be venus where it's day is longer than it's year.
It's human nature to want to explore what the extremes of possibility might be, because they're the limits of reason.These are them astronomically, biologically, BTW. They will expand.
Good point, but you need an universal solvent (more or less potent), a polar molecule (perhaps not vital), a small molecule (and this is important, the molecules of the cell membranes can't be smaller than molecules of the solvent, I think), and the most important... Water Ice is less dense than liquid water, in a planet with cold seasons, life could thrive below the ice, if a solvent is denser in its solid form, the ocean floor will be ice, and the life will go extinct in a freezing enviroment. In Earth, water freezes at the surface, but never in the bottom, the pressure is too high. A different liquid?, perhaps not.
I can easily see our first successful fusion attempts acting like weak stars lasting trillions of years but dangerous and explosive. even when we make fusion work. it may have to be increased in scale to be stable but that's scary. like saying a safer bomb is a bigger bomb.
No, a tidally locked planet's day is NOT as long as its year! If its orbit takes 72 Earth days, for example, its year is 72 Earth days long, but its day is FOREVER.
This compilation is great! And Caitlin's blouse.. looks awesome on her, but I want one for me, though. Also the narration of both, Caitlin and Reid is so easy to listen, they have a good modulation and pace. Love SciShow Space 🌠🔭🌘♥️
In the movie The Europa Report astronauts travel to the moon Europa to find microbial life, (spoiler) but they find signs some pretty sizable intelligent life under the ice, which looked pretty similar, (for the couple of seconds I saw it) to some Earth bound oceanic life.
He’s saying we don’t know how life would do without a day/night cycle on eyeball planets because we don’t have examples of that on earth. But in the next video he talks about life under the crust or the bottom of the ocean. Ummm...?
1000 km/h or more winds would be a serious barrier to complex life as we know it, regardless of temperature. That's way more force than the fastest hurricanes or even tornados recorded on Earth, constantly. You could get around this with a thinner atmosphere, but that wouldn't disperse as much heat. Still, since temperatures would be relatively constant due to tidal locking the thinner atmosphere might not matter if 1/3 of the planet is constantly getting backed and another 1/3 is freezing. Of course you'd still need organisms that can survive in such an atmosphere, but this probably shouldn't just be ruled out as it has been sometimes in the past.
Another thing he did not mention about superhabitable planets. Slower rotation. You see in waters plants can only grow in the light area but the light layer is usually stripped of its nutrients. That is where slower rotation comes in. Longer nights means the minerals from below will mix with the upper layer and more life in the open ocean. Also will a super habitable life be more suitable to devlop civilization?
I believe water is essential. A lot of evidence to that BUT I also think their are a few potentially use liquid ammonia, but I somehow doubt they’ll still need water at some point in their life’s
Increased size of planet means more volcanism, this could lead to a runaway greenhouse situation, probably not more habitable than earth. It would depend on the thickness of the crust, also earths core which generates the magnetic field was hypothesized to be created from a collision with a substantially large planetoid. While a stronger EM shield would be better, a larger version of venus or mars isn't going to help life like us much.
Who said life had to be like us? And just because a planet is bigger, that doesn't necessarily mean that it would have more volcanism. I'll try to find a recent video I watched about that subject for you.
"The James Webb Telescope, launching in 2018..."
oh
Now launching 2023 originally scheduled to launch in 2008. I say scap the bondoggle use its parts for other mission and get then next gen Webb telescope up there. It is scheduled to launch 2025 anyway what is an extra 2 years to get the next, next gen T-scope up into space? Webb's technology and programming is already been obsolete since 2012.
@@Shaden0040 engineers: build it right even if it takes a little longer. Managers: No! We need it yesterday!
@@Shaden0040 I know, surprised Congress hasn't cut their losses and canceled it at this point like they did for the SSC after spending $2B, and that was only a $10B estimated total price, same as the Webb at this point. If it reaches about $20B it will cost more than the SSC even as a % of GDP at the time.
@@Shaden0040 I disagree. We're still getting incredible data from Hubble. And how many years "obsolete" is that telescope?
😭😭😭
Literally all of these episodes: "and we'll learn a lot more... once the James Web Space Telescope launches" :(
this is entertainment, not real astronomy, all the info is designed to confuse you, if you notice it jumps from here to there
Sips of Hell they jump around to cover more content. It’s real astronomy, but broken down so it’s easy to digest and learn from.
@@sipsofhell9018 it doesn't jump around. It's compilation video of lots of older videos. Some from as far back as 2016 or 2017. It even says it's a compilation video in the title.
@@sipsofhell9018 its literally a compilation of different episodes
Its due for december 2021 it will be a great holiday gift if it happens.
Woah, Jupiter stole one of Saturn's moons?
ICYMI: 16:25 It's Europa, not Titan
@SLCPunked 😂😂
@@TankleKlaus Thats Titan.... Moon of Saturn.....
Yah if saturn really wanted it, then it shoulda put a ring on it.
No they swapped moons
You meant Jupiter’s moon Europa, Titan is a moon of Saturn and has lakes and oceans of methane and ethane.
When a region can only support small life forms, it's called the hobbitable zone.
I wanted to add a like, but it's already at 69 and I don't want to disturb that beautiful number.
Damn you. Take your Like.
Narrator aging line fine wine.
Speaking about the girl
You've made that joke a thousand times and don't pretend you'll stop now... old hobbits die hard.
"I'm a doctor Jim, not a bricklayer" Bones on being asked to treat the silicon based life-form.
This video comes up on my autoplay every so often, and I laugh every time at “DONT GO THERE”, as though we were considering it vacationing on Venus
I love how long this episode is🥰
That apart of the reason why I liked it before I watched it lol
It's just 5 previous videos they've made crammed together, nothing original about it. That's why it's long
I could watch Reed all day
@@Dimmerr
I'd rather they make curated playlists rather cramming a bunch together and getting all that juicy watch time.
ua-cam.com/channels/aCAOXLJ72WH9EPGV6z93ag.html
There's an error in this clip, titan is Saturn's moon not Jupiter's moon, I think you mean Europa!
Thought of the same
And it seems like a big one. Sometimes you gotta parse the teleprompter before you say what's on it.
"James Webb Telescope which launches in 2018" YIKES
+
Slim Shady Be more optimistic! Probably 2081
I know. Launch the damn thing already!
2108*
*8210 !
20:15 silicon based hedgehog-like creature that breathes oxigen and "exhales" quartz from its back in the shape of spikes to protect itself.
16:27
Jupiter’s Moon Titan? No, that’s Saturn’s Moon! That’s a huge mistake!
There's a bevy of kewl moons...and that are all strange and new , I do it to..focus on the details and forget where I am...
It's not a huge mistake. Lmao! Can you tell me the names of all of the moons of saturn or jupiter? No?
"Some places we thought might be uninhabitable might not be so bad."
Places like... Venus. 🙃
My college biology professor , in 85 ,said that the only areas that there was no life on earth were , the deepest part of the ocean, in Volcanos and in heavily radioactive areas . Since then , we have found life forms that live in all of those areas .
Something to think of when we talk about life
The Silicon based life episode always makes me think of discworld
I believe the first advanced extraterrestrial life we will encounter in the future is not organic but rather robotic or a combination of both.
The Pinoy Science Channel probably silicone based life
So the Borg??
Well, that intro about Venus may not age well…
And this perspective is fascinating!
Yay! Haven't seen Caitlin for awhile, she's so enthusiastic and adorable!
Having watched this channel for years, it's so nice seeing somebody actually saying nice things about her, she's awesome!
I love her!!!!
@@semaj_5022 I think Caitlin is generally liked by audience :) I must admit I didn't like her at the beginning, but she really won me over very quickly by her enthusiasm and energy. In my opinion Scishow space got the best hosts in general :)
@@semaj_5022 She is so bouncy and enthusiastic it is hard that anyone could not like her!
@@PetrSojnek PBS Eons is a close second, plus it has Hank, he gets everywhere.
When ever I hear about red dwarfs. I think about Jeff Sessions. 🤔
Please make a video about Lagrange Points!
I was looking for life on this Planet. Total catastrophe. No intelligent life found.
Oh come on ! You just looked in the u s..
But would an eyeball planet have a magnetic field if it doesn’t spin?
The higher winds would create more lighting in the upper atmosphere
If its ' core is a permanent magnet. But a permanent magnet needs an initial flux boost.
@@RickMason-yj7pv Space can easily provide something to do the job. Weather it were to hit the planet at a good time for it or not it is the real question.
Eyeball planet doesn't mean it's not spinning. It's just means it's spinning at basically the same rate it encircles it's parent star.
So closer you'd need to spin faster.
Also if planets are layered like we think only the molten metal core should need to spin for sufficiently large enough magnetic fields
Perhaps gravitational pull from a nearby planet also orbiting the star and the star itself might stir the planet’s innards enough to generate a magnetic field.
I've been watching Sci Show Space for years. I liked their videos. That is why I decided to create my own sci-fi/futurist Channel. 👍🙂
James Webb... 2018... Lol! Thank you so much for your special on what it took for the James Webb to launch.
@21:24 - you might want to add four years there... 🤣
Caitlin, I hope you see this - my nine-year-old daughter is a big fan of yours. "She's like ME! She's happy and excited and loves science and cute things, and she's ADORABLE!"
I've often wondered if an ammonia-based solvent could support life.
Probably could, though - given the greater cosmic abundance of water than of ammonia - my money is more on some water-ammonia mixture rather than pure ammonia. I wouldn't be surprised if water-ammonia worlds are as common as water worlds such as our own!
The back of my fridge seems to be a hotspot...
dude your everywhere.
The sun will not get hotter as it becomes a red giant, but that the Earth will get hotter as the sun's photosphere and chorona will get closer to the Earth. In fact ,the sun will get cooler, hence its color changing from yellow to orange then to red as it expands and cools.
It gets about 1% hotter every 100M years. While the average surface temp will be lower making it red it will far more than make up for that with surface area (helium fusion is 2x more energetic that hydrogen and since the core at that point is even more dense it fuses that 100's of times faster than now, that extra energy isn't going to make the sun cooler overall). In 7.6B years it will be big enough to swallow the Earth and even well before that (~1B years) Earth will receive 3000x more heat and light that it does now = enough to make it a molten lava ball. Long before that though in 600m years (6% hotter than now, equaling about 150-160F average temp) the heat will be enough to remove all CO2 from air (putting it in rocks, so plants starve) and over time UV will crack apart all water with the hydrogen lost to space = still fucked, and sooner.
16:31 they had a little error there it was supposed to be saturn lol
No, they just mixed up the moons. They meant Europa.
These people are just script readers.
24.50 is that why we are so interested in mars. One day it will be in the perfect position as the habitable zone reaches out past earth and the only place we can run to.
0:23 come on now, you can build cool sky cities on Venus though!
Rogue planet habitant watching some science news: "we are so lucky to be living in this planet, we might the only living things. According to recent research, it may almost impossible to live near a star due to its extreme condition. But theoretically it possible.
Imagine if one day an inhabited rogue planet happens to cruise through our system and get captured by our star
What about a cold planet with below 0C temperatures on the surface, but have an internal heat source keeping the water and soil jest below the frozen surface habitable? The internal heat source could be tidally induced by a companion, or due to radioactive decay
They kind of suggested that. They mentioned Jupiter's moon "Titan" which was probably meant to be Europa, and it has a similar situation to the one you are suggesting. It has even been looked at for a place to colonize someday.
A tidily locked planet. With an atmosphere would have lighting in the upper atmosphere
No circadian rythm wasn't that Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan problem 🙄 and studio 54 anyone" who likes the night life " "who likes to boogie" " out on the dance 💃 floor woh oh yeah" 😎 am I wrong? Lol 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂
At 16:20 or so he says Titan has an icy surface and is Jupiter's moon. Nope. I'm guessing he meant Europa.
Or he meant to say “Saturn”
@@GabeTStarman yeah, but Titan doesn't have an ice layer.
Question: if we ever do find a super habitable planet and decide to move humanity there on a nice galactic road trip, would it be better for us to take the scenic route and take a little longer so we give ourselves more time to prepare for the changes in gravity and such? Assuming we have the technology to simulate gravity by that point in time I think a slower trip would allow us to condition the humans on board on a more biological standpoint for the double gravity that they'd be dealing with on this "New Eden" allowing them a better chance of survival and adaptation upon arrival. What do you think?
It would probably already take an incredibly long time, so that might not be necessary.
I heard a mistake, Titan is Sature moon
They left out #6. Strangest place to find life-> U.S. Congress. Seriously, it’s like the walking dead in there.
We rely on a corrosive gas to live and a powerful solvent to drink. I'm sure some type of life could look at our planet and think it's planet hell.
plot twist; venus might have life
Denizens of eyeball planets would not hide from the wind; they would use it for energy, like plants use sunlight.
I honestly think we need to stop using Celsius and Fahrenheit and use only Kelvin..
No, we should only get rid of Fahrenheit. But I see your point.
Jupiter's moon Titan?!?!?
Worth noting that a study on the TRAPPIST-1 system came out a few years ago that modeled what would happen if any of the HZ planets had magnetic fields, i.e. would they help preserve the planets' atmospheres against repeated flares at close range. The answer was quite the opposite: with a system that compact, the magnetic field lines for each planet would couple to those of the star, efficiently funneling even more radiation down onto the planets and accelerating the loss of their atmospheres. TRAPPIST-1's magnetic field strength isn't known, but taking an average value from similarly-aged red dwarfs whose magnetic fields have been measured, the planets would be expected to lose the equivalent of all of Earth's atmosphere in about 1 billion years.
Higher gravity planets are also flatter so that means less places wich are uninhabitable or host less diversity like mt.everest and Marianas trench
How are animals that live on the bottom of the ocean affected by the circadian rhythm?
Yes that was a false statement, most cave animals are also cathemeral, meaning they sleep at random times regardless of the solar cycles. So demonstratively, not ALL animals follow the circadian rhythm.
@@M0rtanius agreed. They did screw that one up. I would have said "most earth life that we know of that can at least sometimes see the sun".
So... my pet rock is an alien?
16:30 - Jupiter's moon Europa* (NOT Titan)
Go go Sci Show
Amonia hydrated Life would be extremely smelly. phew! whee!
16:30 "jupiter's moon titan"
In star wars the jedi's light sabers are powered by Cibber crystals . with their said to be sentient. Wonder if Thra's Dark Crystal is silicon as well
Its spelled kyber not cibber
Wait Saturn’s moon titan He said Jupiter’s moon titan 16:30
I love this episode, would be great for future ones like this
@21:21 the jwst launching in 2018..... Lol
I wonder if ammonia or methane based life could be silicon based? Silicon compound doesn’t do well in water but idk what reaction it would have with methane and ammonia respectively
Before you criticise Earth too much I'll remind you this is the only planet currently known to have dogs on it.
Amen.
What if life is much much much much more common than we think it is. What if theres life in our solar system outside of earth? 😮
It's possible, particularly subsurface on other terrestrial bodies. Unfortunately it most likely wouldn't be more complex than just microbes and bacteria. But still pretty cool.
The most obvious place to look for life is........Uranus.
that venus joke did not age well at all
2018 for the James web telescope huh? Now thats what i call a delay >_>
It was originally scheduled for 2007
Life can create it's own heat, and cleave ice, why does the water have to be liquid in the environment? Why can't it be frozen, why can't it be gaseous? We already know cells can survive at pressure extremes
Because it would be unlikely for cells to form in the first place without liquid water as a medium for chemical reactions. Water is just extremely convenient for organic chemistry, it plays like 5 roles at once.
I agree with William Cruz but would like to add one thing. Most life on Earth that exist in extreme environments, extremophiles, tardigrades and whatnot, adapted to live in those places. They didn't poof into existence in extreme environs, they formed in temperate water like everything else and evolved slowly over millions of years.
21:22 The James Webb Space Telescope is sure to launch by July of 2076.
Any day now... Right?
*cough*
Harder to leave a big planet though cuz of that bigger gravity. Might get trapped on it!
Haha James web in 2018, funny.
Nitrogen based might be a possibility
lol yeah wonder where you got that idea... oh wait you’re nitrogen based
16:32 IN VIDEO Titan is a moon of Saturn!!!
How could the eyeball planet have a magnetic field if it wasn't spinning?
It doesn't have to spin. The core just has to rotate within it and that can be done with convection currents. Also, eyeball planets do spin, otherwise they wouldn't be eyeball planets. They just spin once in their year. An example would be venus where it's day is longer than it's year.
This intro aged really badly
Great so now I gotta act up with my rock collection
The james Webb space telescope? 2018?! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
A toxic boiling wasteland where even robots cant survive. DON'T GO THERE! 😂😂😂
It's human nature to want to explore what the extremes of possibility might be, because they're the limits of reason.These are them astronomically, biologically, BTW.
They will expand.
Good point, but you need an universal solvent (more or less potent), a polar molecule (perhaps not vital), a small molecule (and this is important, the molecules of the cell membranes can't be smaller than molecules of the solvent, I think), and the most important...
Water Ice is less dense than liquid water, in a planet with cold seasons, life could thrive below the ice, if a solvent is denser in its solid form, the ocean floor will be ice, and the life will go extinct in a freezing enviroment.
In Earth, water freezes at the surface, but never in the bottom, the pressure is too high. A different liquid?, perhaps not.
I can easily see our first successful fusion attempts acting like weak stars lasting trillions of years but dangerous and explosive. even when we make fusion work. it may have to be increased in scale to be stable but that's scary. like saying a safer bomb is a bigger bomb.
No, a tidally locked planet's day is NOT as long as its year! If its orbit takes 72 Earth days, for example, its year is 72 Earth days long, but its day is FOREVER.
Why does the water have to be liquid if not much pressure
Titan is a moon of Saturn!!!
This compilation is great! And Caitlin's blouse.. looks awesome on her, but I want one for me, though. Also the narration of both, Caitlin and Reid is so easy to listen, they have a good modulation and pace.
Love SciShow Space 🌠🔭🌘♥️
Hahahha Caitlin has good pace? Hahhahahaha is a good host?
Ahhahahaha easy to listen to?
In the movie The Europa Report astronauts travel to the moon Europa to find microbial life,
(spoiler)
but they find signs some pretty sizable intelligent life under the ice, which looked pretty similar, (for the couple of seconds I saw it) to some Earth bound oceanic life.
He’s saying we don’t know how life would do without a day/night cycle on eyeball planets because we don’t have examples of that on earth. But in the next video he talks about life under the crust or the bottom of the ocean. Ummm...?
1000 km/h or more winds would be a serious barrier to complex life as we know it, regardless of temperature. That's way more force than the fastest hurricanes or even tornados recorded on Earth, constantly. You could get around this with a thinner atmosphere, but that wouldn't disperse as much heat. Still, since temperatures would be relatively constant due to tidal locking the thinner atmosphere might not matter if 1/3 of the planet is constantly getting backed and another 1/3 is freezing. Of course you'd still need organisms that can survive in such an atmosphere, but this probably shouldn't just be ruled out as it has been sometimes in the past.
On land, perhaps, but if it were an ocean planet, complex life could develop just fine. They might live deep underwater to avoid the turbulent air.
21:22 JWT will surely be launched...soon...aaaaany minute now...maybe...please???
What about the wind ?
Pls do more of these! This reminds me of the history of life video amd i love it!
You made a mistake titan in Saturn's moon not Jupiter at 16:33
Set Titan on fire, and maybe in 100,000 years, itll be habitable. Lol
Sees video length... Straps in for a long old video 😅
Another thing he did not mention about superhabitable planets. Slower rotation. You see in waters plants can only grow in the light area but the light layer is usually stripped of its nutrients. That is where slower rotation comes in. Longer nights means the minerals from below will mix with the upper layer and more life in the open ocean. Also will a super habitable life be more suitable to devlop civilization?
Slips of the Tongue: "Jupiter's moon, Titan"
Dated statements: "The launch of JWST in 2018".
Reed is a sweet cuddle bear.
"the james web telescope, lauching in 2018" ouch
I believe water is essential. A lot of evidence to that BUT I also think their are a few potentially use liquid ammonia, but I somehow doubt they’ll still need water at some point in their life’s
What is an 'Aladdin pun'? I have never heard that term before, and I see no relation to "1001 Arabian Nights".
The truth is that we are basically fucked. Locked on this little ball of rock... well until conditions are stable.
Increased size of planet means more volcanism, this could lead to a runaway greenhouse situation, probably not more habitable than earth. It would depend on the thickness of the crust, also earths core which generates the magnetic field was hypothesized to be created from a collision with a substantially large planetoid. While a stronger EM shield would be better, a larger version of venus or mars isn't going to help life like us much.
Who said life had to be like us? And just because a planet is bigger, that doesn't necessarily mean that it would have more volcanism. I'll try to find a recent video I watched about that subject for you.
This guy explains it very well. I suggest that you watch this and then form your opinion.
ua-cam.com/video/S7xdgMoFWdk/v-deo.html
What about stalactites? The things that grow in caves and have a tree-ring like thing? How do we know that isn't silicon life?
21:23 It is Nov 24th 2020 as of this viewing and James Webb still hasn't launched