We can’t even have 7 players without an afk or a bot tank or long wait in queue. Imagine now 10 players per team! Does maps can even support that many players?
Well, people give up playing because they want to play TD or Light and the game doesn't start, so I think we're going to have more light and heavies now, unless people will troll it and go all TDs and have like 4 TDs in one game 💀
Bro true the amount of afk people needs to change. Wg needs a massive ban wave for people who consistently go into battle and do move or barely move a minute or two before the game ends. You go afk ban or pay money to get your account back
10vs10 its the best idea, because in the current amount 7vs7, if you dont get a light and the enemy does, game over, the enemy gets an extra heavy, your heavies dont, game over, so with 10vs10, would eleminate that gap of the matchmaking deciding you dont get the right class and amount of tanks equally. obviously, if the opposite team is bad its irrelevant, but the point its for the majority
You're correct ! The Top / Original comment person above. 7 vs 7 is Mess / steam roll / Chaos. What's gonna happen if " Adding 3 more Nubs " on each team. Impossible to cover other 9 nubs mistakes. Only 5 vs 5 mode has some Sanity cuz 1 or platoon 2 Pro players can lead the team to win ! Only around 5 ppl have sanity saying like... " 1 vs 19 ". So surprised that how Blinded ppl are like the same with the Mess Wotb situation.
For anyone with concerns about this gamemode due to afk's/maps being too small, hear me out. First off yall act like you get 1-2 afk's every single game, which is an insane exaggeration and statistically improbable. Adding 6 more players to the battle means that each individual player represents a smaller percentage of the team, so an afk would actually be less harmful in this game mode. a 6v7 is much harder than a 9v10. Even if you have 2 afks, its not just going to be an easy sweep for the other team. thats 8 guns that can punish overly-agressive players, who will easily be deleted if they do something dumb. 10v10 is gonna be slower paced and drawn out, becaue the risk is much higher for a MUCH lower reward. The overall HP pool for each team is also way bigger, so one afk isnt taking away as much effective HP in a 10v10 situation vs a 7v7 situation. Plus the afk issue is not as bad as people make it out to be, and ive had many games with an afk where we still win because of the team playing smart and passively. Positioning in this game mode is going to be essential, and the team that clears a flank first will most likely win, There is not really any space to jam all 10 players on one side of the map as well. Tanks will actually benefit from playing their roles. Hevs as the frontline shock absorbers, Meds as 2nd line support or flank fighters, TD's sniping and punishing aggressive plays, and Lights just floating around harassing. This will be a great game mode where people can learn to do the "little things" that can increase your stats and winrate in normal game modes.
Player skill and afk player numbers vary greatly per server. In eu server I have written down from 10 games for a whole week how many afk players(regardless if its troll or connection loss) and I get roughly 40%, meaning every 4 games I either get a player who loads very late to the game(sometime they barely just moving when they are the last one left) or just never move. Funny how its either only 1 person on 1 team or 1 player on each team, never 2 afk on same team as if the matchmaker knows. Overall I agree that more players means a system with more cogs will perform better if 1 cog is faulty, its why pc version allows for light tanks to help the team more and are picked more often(and also bigger maps) While modes like skirmish further cause balance issues with just having a standoff and seeing which team has better heavies.
@@Devilforce988 considering that 40% is 2 in 5, not 1 in 4, bit otherwise i see your point, but with the random mathmaking, its literally random player pools
10 v 10 only makes sense if they release larger maps or keep the gameplay exclusive to the current largest maps. Everything else will just be even bigger steamrolls than we get already in 7 v 7.
It would be more like a firefight rather than a chase match so yeah less strategy but more action? I don't know but am happy that I don't have to wait for Big Boss game mode in order to use my times 5X certificade now I can make almost the same amount of damage with 10vs10 and research them all!
the camo comes from a UA-cam channel that restores British tanks, about a year ago they made that camo and WG is funding there projects so they are putting there Chieften camo in the game
Honestly i watched the whole video and i thought he was blue valling me for a sec but we got to the point of 10v10 the only thing i care about besides the tanks i guess cause im too poor for camos
On EU, 7v7 even on ratings is a joke. Most game are team wipes, sometimes with you, sometimes against. Its a lotto. 10v 10 just make the one sidedness even worse. Whats happened to the spotting mechanic?Sometimes, I know its impossible for the enemy to have spotted me, yet I get spotted. Have they changed something the kast couple if years?
It russia server they have this mod, and a few tanks in all tiers that we dont in na or eu server. See they videos from russian youtubers and see a new tier x tank, and so many legend camo for all tanks we dont have. the wg are so butterhole
You're correct ! 7 vs 7 is Mess / steam roll / Chaos. What's gonna happen if " Adding 3 more Nubs " on each team. Impossible to cover other 9 nubs mistakes. Only 5 vs 5 mode has some Sanity cuz 1 or platoon 2 Pro players can lead the team to win ! Only around 5 ppl have sanity saying like... " 1 vs 19 ". So surprised that how Blinded ppl are like the same with the Mess Wotb situation.
Regular KV2 at tier 6 is 640 damage and 21 second reload, so same damage and 2 seconds faster reload. The tier 9 one makes no sense. It must be 800 damage every 19 seconds to be worthwhile.
@@halbailman I think if we want to keep the 152mm gun smasher's reload time would be appropiate for a balanced tank in tier 9. This just shows how ridiculous smasher is for tier 7
You're correct ! 7 vs 7 is Mess / steam roll / Chaos. What's gonna happen if " Adding 3 more Nubs " on each team. Impossible to cover other 9 nubs mistakes. Only 5 vs 5 mode has some Sanity cuz 1 or platoon 2 Pro players can lead the team to win ! Only around 5 ppl have sanity saying like... " 1 vs 19 ". So surprised that how Blinded ppl are like the same with the Mess Wotb situation.
Bruh 10v10 s coming in blitz and i think the E10 the tier IX kv2 and the dthstr would be tanks for a new season so yeah if the e10 would be the tier 7 then almost everyone gonna get it for free and that gun on it is kinda scary
@@South-African-powered Thanks bro, was just confirming as have also heard about it as a tech tree tank, but have no idea when its going to be released, had watched some matches on a developer server few days back
You're correct ! 7 vs 7 is Mess / steam roll / Chaos. What's gonna happen if " Adding 3 more Nubs " on each team. Impossible to cover other 9 nubs mistakes. Only 5 vs 5 mode has some Sanity cuz 1 or platoon 2 Pro players can lead the team to win ! Only around 5 ppl have sanity saying like... " 1 vs 19 ". So surprised that how Blinded ppl are like the same with the Mess Wotb situation.
I think games will be more even cause one team will dominate heavy side and the other will dominate medium side and then they’ll be roughly even at the end of a battle.
You're correct ! The Top / Original comment person above. 7 vs 7 is Mess / steam roll / Chaos. What's gonna happen if " Adding 3 more Nubs " on each team. Impossible to cover other 9 nubs mistakes. Only 5 vs 5 mode has some Sanity cuz 1 or platoon 2 Pro players can lead the team to win ! Only around 5 ppl have sanity saying like... " 1 vs 19 ". So surprised that how Blinded ppl are like the same with the Mess Wotb situation.
5v5 skirmish always seemed to make the main problem of blitz even worse, that being that the weight on every player's shoulder is huge and the ability to drasticaly decrease the team's ability to win with 1 small mistake, leading to their odds of victory plummeting hard(ignoring variables such as skill). I loved how pc version had 15 players cause even if you had multiple idiots, your team can still crush as every player is a smaller cog in the system. I really think 10v10 will be way better than 5v5 and even normal 7v7 mode.
I do Not think You're correct. 7 vs 7 is Mess / steam roll / Chaos. What's gonna happen if " Adding 3 more Nubs " on each team. Impossible to cover other 9 nubs mistakes. Only 5 vs 5 mode has some Sanity cuz 1 or platoon 2 Pro players can lead the team to win ! Only around 5 ppl have sanity saying like... " 1 vs 19 ". So surprised that so many ppl saying 10 vs 10 excited ! You'll see the More chaos on 10 vs 10, crystal clear obvious, phew
@@UmaShikaBuaka First of all, you cant just assume all 3 will be nubs. Regular WoT on pc would be dead by now considering they have 15 per team and one person being dead within the first minute changes nothing while in blitz and especially skirmish, it can already spell disaster. Second, you shouldnt have to platoon in order to have a decent win/loss ratio and hope the enemy has worse platoons or braindead players who cant fight against platoons. I can also just que for skirmish and see for myself how long it takes to get a match despite the matchmaker needing less players to start a game, showing that most players dont play it and if players dont play it, it aint that good. So you should wait for 10v10 before critizising a mode that isnt out and comparing it to a mode that has been out for a good amount of time and feels like a boring smaller version of what regular 7v7 can boil down to: Hug the same building as the enemy heavy to see who can track the other first or get a lucky penetration, camp with a TD in the same spot entire match to just lock down an entire sightline, making it a pain in the rear for the enemy to even push in, light/mediums just exist for no reason cause playing peek-a-boo is dangerous and flanking doesnt exist, and the match is over sometimes in less than 2 minutes.
10 vs 10 is coming and these idiots from wargaming will still keep saying "MaPs ArE tOo SmAlL fOr JaPaNeSe HeAvIeS"
who cares about those, type 5 heavy is one of the worst tier x in pc wot
Japan gets owned by one branch from Germany (Grille 15)
@@izayatiji1the o-i tho 😭😭
@@RandomGuy69. Ho-ri:
@@Yomest-ip3tq man the Grille 15s pelnetration is going brrrrrr
Meanwhile reaload is collecting dust simulator
We can’t even have 7 players without an afk or a bot tank or long wait in queue. Imagine now 10 players per team! Does maps can even support that many players?
This is going to be a disaster for sure. Will only amp up existing problems even more
Well, people give up playing because they want to play TD or Light and the game doesn't start, so I think we're going to have more light and heavies now, unless people will troll it and go all TDs and have like 4 TDs in one game 💀
Bro true the amount of afk people needs to change. Wg needs a massive ban wave for people who consistently go into battle and do move or barely move a minute or two before the game ends. You go afk ban or pay money to get your account back
@@jbitt1617 blitz would be better at 10v10 because some maps are huge like molendijk
@@Raidernation1994 they need to be shadowbanned and put exclusively into lobbies with other afkers
Yooo finally a 10v10 coming to wotb
Am exited too! PC like experience
@@lxDastanxlnot exactly pc has 15vs15
“ a mobile game for 15 to 20 year olds” im fifty lol
You may be an outlier lol
50+ for me. GenX is OG. Original gamers.
that's cool that you guys still play videogames
56 here
61 here
Came for the kv2 stayed for the 10v10
6 platoons of 3 players maybe
10v10?
You mean 1v19?
says 30%er lol
@@Enlightened_SpursFan Sounds like insecurity and inability. You should stay humble, you never know when you're talking to someone better than you.
@@ItsDaNewGuythats what a 30% would say😂 xD
@@kelvisshandeisomeone is spoilt with good teammates
@@Yomest-ip3tq the Most aren t that great but it s enough to win the Most Games.
10v10 in mines is going to be fun, I can't wait😅
Yep 3 more brainless players going town and not hill
Mines and other smaller maps will probably get put in a different gamemode (7v7 and then 10v10 for bigger maps like Castilla)
@@Private_jin nope, I already tested this game mood on the ru server and absolutly all maps are available 👌
Fr and bots will just charge at the other team and die
10vs10
its the best idea, because in the current amount 7vs7, if you dont get a light and the enemy does, game over, the enemy gets an extra heavy, your heavies dont, game over, so with 10vs10, would eleminate that gap of the matchmaking deciding you dont get the right class and amount of tanks equally. obviously, if the opposite team is bad its irrelevant, but the point its for the majority
great point, you just GET it haha
Ye
Or 3 tier 10 heavies and 1 tier 9 when other team has 3 tier 9 heavies and one tier 10
It could also end even more skewed. Something like 3 tier 10 meds against one tier 9 light or something like that lol.
This 1v19 mode looks really cool
1vs19 bruh
You're correct ! The Top / Original comment person above.
7 vs 7 is Mess / steam roll / Chaos. What's gonna happen if " Adding 3 more Nubs " on each team. Impossible to cover other 9 nubs mistakes.
Only 5 vs 5 mode has some Sanity cuz 1 or platoon 2 Pro players can lead the team to win !
Only around 5 ppl have sanity saying like... " 1 vs 19 ". So surprised that how Blinded ppl are like the same with the Mess Wotb situation.
11:27
kid : Mom, please give me some pocket money.
mom : why?
kid : look at this TNH camo!
mom : ☠️
Mom: I prefer the shitbarn ☠️💀
For anyone with concerns about this gamemode due to afk's/maps being too small, hear me out.
First off yall act like you get 1-2 afk's every single game, which is an insane exaggeration and statistically improbable. Adding 6 more players to the battle means that each individual player represents a smaller percentage of the team, so an afk would actually be less harmful in this game mode. a 6v7 is much harder than a 9v10. Even if you have 2 afks, its not just going to be an easy sweep for the other team. thats 8 guns that can punish overly-agressive players, who will easily be deleted if they do something dumb. 10v10 is gonna be slower paced and drawn out, becaue the risk is much higher for a MUCH lower reward.
The overall HP pool for each team is also way bigger, so one afk isnt taking away as much effective HP in a 10v10 situation vs a 7v7 situation. Plus the afk issue is not as bad as people make it out to be, and ive had many games with an afk where we still win because of the team playing smart and passively.
Positioning in this game mode is going to be essential, and the team that clears a flank first will most likely win, There is not really any space to jam all 10 players on one side of the map as well. Tanks will actually benefit from playing their roles. Hevs as the frontline shock absorbers, Meds as 2nd line support or flank fighters, TD's sniping and punishing aggressive plays, and Lights just floating around harassing. This will be a great game mode where people can learn to do the "little things" that can increase your stats and winrate in normal game modes.
Player skill and afk player numbers vary greatly per server. In eu server I have written down from 10 games for a whole week how many afk players(regardless if its troll or connection loss) and I get roughly 40%, meaning every 4 games I either get a player who loads very late to the game(sometime they barely just moving when they are the last one left) or just never move. Funny how its either only 1 person on 1 team or 1 player on each team, never 2 afk on same team as if the matchmaker knows. Overall I agree that more players means a system with more cogs will perform better if 1 cog is faulty, its why pc version allows for light tanks to help the team more and are picked more often(and also bigger maps) While modes like skirmish further cause balance issues with just having a standoff and seeing which team has better heavies.
@@Devilforce988 considering that 40% is 2 in 5, not 1 in 4, bit otherwise i see your point, but with the random mathmaking, its literally random player pools
lol, "and then we have THIS" just cracked me up XD
This game is for twenty something players max only?? I am 62 and enjoy wtb a lot! :)) Though I only play now and then (since five or six years time) …
Btw the new line comes in the may update and the new mode comes in the june anniversary update right?
i love how he talked about a lot of information all in 1 video instead of splitting everything into 3 different videos
10 v 10 only makes sense if they release larger maps or keep the gameplay exclusive to the current largest maps. Everything else will just be even bigger steamrolls than we get already in 7 v 7.
It would be more like a firefight rather than a chase match so yeah less strategy but more action? I don't know but am happy that I don't have to wait for Big Boss game mode in order to use my times 5X certificade now I can make almost the same amount of damage with 10vs10 and research them all!
like a real tank battle
imagine how the maps will look like if they make them bigger which is going to be great for light tanks
I think the chieftain cammo is called Berlin , during them being based in Germany during the Cold War saga
Just saw you post it on discord earlier😊
Okay, now this gonna be more crazy.
The 10v10 will be extremely chaotic in small maps, but might be a fun experience
Thanks for your daily videos.
the camo comes from a UA-cam channel that restores British tanks, about a year ago they made that camo and WG is funding there projects so they are putting there Chieften camo in the game
How do you get the 4005 camo? Like… is it not out yet? I masters the 4005 and it’s still not offered
Is the Himmelsdorf rework coming out in this same update?
That is what i'm waiting for
10v10 i hope its gonna be good
MBT-B is kinda just a tier higher pawlack since how similar they are on there tank profile
theres not many main battle tanks in blitz as of rn and im very excited for it.
We just need them to add the second variant of the T30 that also had an auto loading mechanism for its 155mm
10v10 with 3 player toon each in tvp will be mad fun
in tanks blitz(the russiam version of the game) 10 vs 10 is already available
Honestly i watched the whole video and i thought he was blue valling me for a sec but we got to the point of 10v10 the only thing i care about besides the tanks i guess cause im too poor for camos
Thank you for your content. Without that, I would certainly have left the game a long time ago. And I'm getting better.
Mbt b was the wot 10yr anniversary gift I believe. I bet it will be the same for wotb
10v10?? And how long is the MM queue gonna take? 10 working days?
Wow well I hope there will be waaaaaaaaaaay bigger maps for the game with this mod. But I seriously doubt it.
Is mm any better stoped playing because of the 5 min wait times
10v10 will be fun
wow droodles is really excited today 😎
Willing to get tnh back from tech tree just for that reactive camo
Looking forward to it!!
On EU, 7v7 even on ratings is a joke. Most game are team wipes, sometimes with you, sometimes against. Its a lotto. 10v 10 just make the one sidedness even worse.
Whats happened to the spotting mechanic?Sometimes, I know its impossible for the enemy to have spotted me, yet I get spotted. Have they changed something the kast couple if years?
Awesome 👍
I played the 10v10 on the ru servers and it was pretty chaotic and wild tbh :D
Finally, a 10v10
It is needed
im really excited for this
It will be very interesting 🎉
It russia server they have this mod, and a few tanks in all tiers that we dont in na or eu server. See they videos from russian youtubers and see a new tier x tank, and so many legend camo for all tanks we dont have. the wg are so butterhole
Yaaaaaaay! The best idea!
Unless this is a “fun mode” only, 10v10 will wreck all historical stats.
Annnndddd it’s a game mode
You're correct !
7 vs 7 is Mess / steam roll / Chaos. What's gonna happen if " Adding 3 more Nubs " on each team. Impossible to cover other 9 nubs mistakes.
Only 5 vs 5 mode has some Sanity cuz 1 or platoon 2 Pro players can lead the team to win !
Only around 5 ppl have sanity saying like... " 1 vs 19 ". So surprised that how Blinded ppl are like the same with the Mess Wotb situation.
Thank god they balanced the bz 176 unlike the behemoth it is on pc
The BZ176 at tier 9? Looks like wargaming is learning from their mistakes on pc…
based
it should have its maps because it will be too cramped for 10v10
Would FV215B 183 have enough ammo for 10v10 game mode?
Now WOTB should add artillery function
Bruh the tier 9 kv-2 has 10 less alpha and less dpm than the tier 7 smasher?!?
Regular KV2 at tier 6 is 640 damage and 21 second reload, so same damage and 2 seconds faster reload. The tier 9 one makes no sense. It must be 800 damage every 19 seconds to be worthwhile.
@@halbailman I think if we want to keep the 152mm gun smasher's reload time would be appropiate for a balanced tank in tier 9. This just shows how ridiculous smasher is for tier 7
physically I might not fit the “young” demographic at all, but mentally I sure do, so imho that TNH camo is sick. Love it
i think 10v10 is great. would open up both sides of the map being used and 3 man platoons would be more balanced and not as impactful in a normal 7v7.
We are one month away from Blitz turning 10 years old 😮
wg can't even balance the number of each type of tanks in one match and now they intend to create a 10v10
You're correct !
7 vs 7 is Mess / steam roll / Chaos. What's gonna happen if " Adding 3 more Nubs " on each team. Impossible to cover other 9 nubs mistakes.
Only 5 vs 5 mode has some Sanity cuz 1 or platoon 2 Pro players can lead the team to win !
Only around 5 ppl have sanity saying like... " 1 vs 19 ". So surprised that how Blinded ppl are like the same with the Mess Wotb situation.
10 years wot and 100k subcribers soon
yes 10vs10 Very excited I hope it is permanent
Yessssssss 10v10!
Bruh 10v10 s coming in blitz and i think the E10 the tier IX kv2 and the dthstr would be tanks for a new season so yeah if the e10 would be the tier 7 then almost everyone gonna get it for free and that gun on it is kinda scary
When toped up,it look like e100 without side skirts and got a paint job.
Chieftan Camo is the Berlin urban camouflage from the Cold War. Cool as fuck
10v10 before gta 6 that’s crazy
this is very intresting
World of tanjs blitz is slowly turning into world of tanks
When is this happening?
Honestly I don’t think people are gonna get the kv2 cause of how good it is they are just getting it cause it’s a tier 9 kv2
10:32 Hey droodles what about the Rinoceronte coming to blitz, is it a tech tree tank or premium tank
I think it's the new tech tree
@@South-African-powered Thanks bro, was just confirming as have also heard about it as a tech tree tank, but have no idea when its going to be released, had watched some matches on a developer server few days back
@@sweincorreia oh no problems chap 👍
Wargaming i am Begging you to add the e 100 gun to the e10
wargaming didn't learn from the bz-176 incident
I thought having 6 noobs and 7 enemies was enough💀💀💀💀💀
Lol
You're correct !
7 vs 7 is Mess / steam roll / Chaos. What's gonna happen if " Adding 3 more Nubs " on each team. Impossible to cover other 9 nubs mistakes.
Only 5 vs 5 mode has some Sanity cuz 1 or platoon 2 Pro players can lead the team to win !
Only around 5 ppl have sanity saying like... " 1 vs 19 ". So surprised that how Blinded ppl are like the same with the Mess Wotb situation.
@@UmaShikaBuakastop spamming
why everyone not talk about the rockets on the bz, drood completly ignored them?
Finally 10vs10
Nice
Dude drood is just a Chad fr
Yahhhh nice
nice
Great instead of 5-6 morons on your team with MM, you will have 8-9 morons. It will be one side steamrolls
I think games will be more even cause one team will dominate heavy side and the other will dominate medium side and then they’ll be roughly even at the end of a battle.
quit playing victim and learn the game. if every single one of your teammates is a bot, sounds like you are the common denominator. get good
You're correct ! The Top / Original comment person above.
7 vs 7 is Mess / steam roll / Chaos. What's gonna happen if " Adding 3 more Nubs " on each team. Impossible to cover other 9 nubs mistakes.
Only 5 vs 5 mode has some Sanity cuz 1 or platoon 2 Pro players can lead the team to win !
Only around 5 ppl have sanity saying like... " 1 vs 19 ". So surprised that how Blinded ppl are like the same with the Mess Wotb situation.
Would be better as a fun mode
5v5 skirmish always seemed to make the main problem of blitz even worse, that being that the weight on every player's shoulder is huge and the ability to drasticaly decrease the team's ability to win with 1 small mistake, leading to their odds of victory plummeting hard(ignoring variables such as skill). I loved how pc version had 15 players cause even if you had multiple idiots, your team can still crush as every player is a smaller cog in the system. I really think 10v10 will be way better than 5v5 and even normal 7v7 mode.
I do Not think You're correct.
7 vs 7 is Mess / steam roll / Chaos. What's gonna happen if " Adding 3 more Nubs " on each team. Impossible to cover other 9 nubs mistakes.
Only 5 vs 5 mode has some Sanity cuz 1 or platoon 2 Pro players can lead the team to win !
Only around 5 ppl have sanity saying like... " 1 vs 19 ". So surprised that so many ppl saying 10 vs 10 excited ! You'll see the More chaos on 10 vs 10, crystal clear obvious, phew
@@UmaShikaBuaka First of all, you cant just assume all 3 will be nubs. Regular WoT on pc would be dead by now considering they have 15 per team and one person being dead within the first minute changes nothing while in blitz and especially skirmish, it can already spell disaster. Second, you shouldnt have to platoon in order to have a decent win/loss ratio and hope the enemy has worse platoons or braindead players who cant fight against platoons. I can also just que for skirmish and see for myself how long it takes to get a match despite the matchmaker needing less players to start a game, showing that most players dont play it and if players dont play it, it aint that good. So you should wait for 10v10 before critizising a mode that isnt out and comparing it to a mode that has been out for a good amount of time and feels like a boring smaller version of what regular 7v7 can boil down to: Hug the same building as the enemy heavy to see who can track the other first or get a lucky penetration, camp with a TD in the same spot entire match to just lock down an entire sightline, making it a pain in the rear for the enemy to even push in, light/mediums just exist for no reason cause playing peek-a-boo is dangerous and flanking doesnt exist, and the match is over sometimes in less than 2 minutes.
Now we can see more camping super heavies....i would prefer more skirmishes with full maps
Leopard 1 needs to come to wotb
Uhm wdym?
Hey Pooporama!
Dth star finna have 3000 dpm
10v10 is just skirmish mode on full maps.
I'm 60 I like the neon camo
Yey 10v10😊
When I think I’ve bought everything almost they put $500 worth of sht in one patch O_O 🤯
Smasher better 😬😬😬
BZ-72-1 😎
Rinocerante camo rockets on left side would’ve been better imo 😬😬😬
There is to little players in 7v7 right now. Half the team camping like cowards not doing anything
Does anyone know how much does the E-10 weigh?
Hi droodles!
6:09 thats me in the comments 😍
Bz 176?! Shits already op in wot pc
BZ-176 will have 15cm gun? what a let down
omg I love it, till now it was just 1v7, now it´ll be 1v10, I´m so happy...bruh xD
Maps are to small tho😭 (I havnt watch the vid yet I’ll see)
Yeeeessssss!!!!!!!