Part 1/12 || The Wahhabi Myth: Debunking ubiquitous Fallacies || Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
- You can find us on:
Instagram: / al.madrasatu.al.umariyyah
UA-cam: / abdulrahmanhassanofficial
Facebook: / ustadharh
Twitter: / amau2525
BarakAllahu feekum.
Ustad why dont start Ah course for arabic language the basics
It would be highly benefical if u could adress these 3 matters:
The opinions of aimmatul najd on:
1. udhr bil jalh in usool al deen
2. Assisting kuffar against muslims
3. Ruling with other then what Allaah revealed.
All this from their own texts and opinions, also explain how their views and actions are any different then daish and modern day groups that are named khawarij.
When will be de second episode release?
BROTHERS & SISTERS THIS IS 12 PART EPISODES PLEASE HAVE PATIENCE WITH YOUR QUESTIONS INSHA'ALLAH USTADH WILL ANSWER YOU'R DOUBT'S AS THE PURPOSE OF THIS SERIES .
When are the rest comming??
Are you going to address the takfir upon the Ottomans made by the najdi ulema, as recorded in al-Durar al-Saniyyah?
Shaykh Nāṣir ad-Dīn al-Albānī - may Allāh have mercy upon him - said in his Silsilat al-Hūdā wa‘n-Nūr (# 179):
The term: “Wahhābiyyah,” in reality is a Turkish political term. It spread during the era in which the Turks turned away from ruling according to Islām. “Wahhābī” is an ascription to Wahhāb. Wahhāb, if we study the Arabic language is an ascription to whom? It is an ascription to al-Wahhāb. Who is al-Wahhāb? It is Allāh - the Blessed and Exalted! Thus this is an honorable ascription. This does not degrade the one given this ascription. However, most of those who were under the banner of the unjust Turkish political system were non-Arabs and they did not have understand of the Arabic. language.
- End quote
Shaykh al-‘Allāmah ‘Abd al-Ḥamīd ibn Bādīs al-Mālikī - may Allāh have mercy upon him - said in his Majaltu ‘ṣ-Ṣirāṭ (5):
The Turks were the ones who coined the term: “Wahhābiyyah,” to the Ḥanbalis of Najd. Similarly, they are the ones who spread slanderous accusations and lies against them all over the Muslim world, as they hired jurists throughout the world to write and promote lies against the Ḥanbalis of Najd.
-End quote
where are other parts of this series .... reply plzzz
This is problem with Muslims today. They have already made they minds up without even watching half of the lectures! If you can't be asked to watch full don't worry am sure other will. This is just intro. Watch full and make ur mind up than. And btw no scholar was perfect or is perfect. The best person ever is the prophet peace be upon.
Lets look at the 3 categories of people he mentioned in this video...
1) a person who is a historian but not an islamic scholar
2) an islamic scholar but no knowledge of history of the era of Abdul wahab
3) an islamic scholar who has deviated thoughts and ideologies of islam.
Abdul wahabs own father and brother rejected him.. So let's clarify.. Both of them were...
1) scholars of the highest degree
2) There was no need for them to learn the history of Abdul wahab because they lived through all his fitnah, corruption and bloodshed upon other muslims...
3) Being deviated? Well i guess that is a reletive label... Even the mushriks of makkah regarded the prophet (saw) as deviated and straying from the path of their forefathers... So that is a very lame and feeble excuse or category to place forward as evidence....
Fear Allah. Did you withness this blood shade and other crimes you accuse the shaykh of? As a Muslim Allah warned us about accusing people falsely. You been fair to yourself and read the shaykh' s books and see if what the deviants groups who falsely accused him is true? Be careful of the day you will stand before Allah regarding your accusations against the shaykh. Verily the son of Adam doesn't utter a word expect there are scribe ready to write it down. Blind Following is haram. Do not blind follow others what they say about the shaykh read his works. Do not cause the hate you have for a people causes to be unjust.
Where's the next episode?
Part 2??????
Assalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuhu when part 2 is coming, please start the series to clarify the Wahhabi myth.
What about Superman ibn Abdulwahab who refuted his own brother?
Superman? You mean Sulaimān Ibn Abdulwahhab?
His brother was sufee
Ustaad pls Turn on auto generate English
Is part 2 came out already?
Can’t find part2?
Aghi when will this be oploaded to refut yasr qadi djazak Allah ghair
If only more people could watch this series...
Mashallah, let’s be patient and learn other 11 episodes.
Assalamu'akaykum Ustadh. What is the situation with Madrasatul umariyah. Can we actually enroll? Barakallahu Feekum
I have asked myself this exact question over and over... but I have come to resolve that perhaps that means the UA-cam channel... Coz all the lesson on here. Insha Allah I will travel to Dubai where the ustadh is and ask him this exact question if Allah enables me.
@@HakimGanya Opening later this year إن شاء الله
Barak allah feek ya shikh
باراك الله فيك اخي
Brother write بارك الله فيك
It was ibn abdulwahab who was not bad but his followers who deviated. if he was back he himself would refute his so called followers who made the sects etc
First of all.... Who made Muhammed abdul wahab an Imaaam... Sound the shia..... No matter how you spin it, he made takfir upon senior ulama teaching in the haramayn at that time and also upon the general population of Muslims who didnt agree with them, secondly this young man has been indoctrinated in the "race horse thinking" of the wahabi thought because its a known fact thats its not permissable for students studying in their institutes to read any other literature except that which is passed and allowed by the institute, thirdly his own father and brother very vehemently denied his ideologies and tactics, fourthly There is no denying that he aligned and even married into the saud family who were paid by the british to fracture the unity of the muslim ummah at that time under the umayyads... These are absolute facts written by contemporary scholars of the time whether they like it or not, the effects of his alliance is visible for all to see even present day 2019.....10yrs ago the saudi kingdom had a conference on abdul wahab portraying to the world his innocence from all allegations but the unfortunately they managed to convince alot of people by removing alot of his errors and misguided thought from his books in the new publications that were published for that conference.. Abdul wahab was never a scholar of note by any stretch of the imagination, just because he spoke arabic and had primary education from his father does not make him knowledgeable at all unlike Ibn Taymiyyah(ra) who was an excellent scholar but made errors in his judgements of certain issues of islam.... In this entire tirade of all the pre conditions this young man has mentioned in this first part video he hasnt given a single reference to back these claims, it seems the only source of knowledge for him are the books of Sh Ibn Taymiyyah and Abdul wahab, what a shame.... There were no islamic before them or in their time or after them.... Really??? We must take the words of his grandchildren who are absolute slaves of the US/Israel and the Kuffaar.... What a joke....
Well said brother, the saud enemies the number one of the Muslim.
this is just part 1 relaxx
Completely lost brother bismillah
May Allaah forgive you and us
You telling others that they shouldn't talk if they lack the historical knowledge, yet you yourself lack that, and when it's given, you character assassinate those that reported it.