Are Gun Laws Racist?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 7

  • @dawudasha977
    @dawudasha977 5 місяців тому

    I'm the first to file the BOF1031 in Riverside County suing the Riverside County Sheriff Department for denying my CCW. I filed myself. Let me tell you The Riverside County Sheriff Department was not happy to be served. They were jerks to the person who served the notice. I come to find out not only are the issuing agencies making millions off the CCW scheme throughout California but also the trainers, Attorneys and every one else involved and my case will disrupt that whole flow of money! When I win i will expect an apology from everyone who insulted me and didn't believe in me! I'm a CRPA member and volunteer and I'm also starting a new chapter soon so I'm in the fight.
    Also FYI Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco kneeled to BLM and BOWED his head in prostration during a protest which after he performed that disgusting action the protesters ended up throwing a screwdriver and hitting him in the face! 😂 Look it up. It really happened. Do we need a Sheriff that panders to criminals? No self respecting Chief Law Enforcement Officer will ever bow to anything like BLM! I showed my friend in AZ who's a deputy the video and he said "If any Sheriff di that here an AZ they would be recalled!" Damn shame. It's all over the UA-cam.

  • @turtletruth
    @turtletruth 2 місяці тому

    UNITED STATES MARINE: (From Young-Marine to Man/Husband/Father, to Grandfather.)
    50 years ago, was my (3rd) third Non-Violent/Victimless DUI felony offense ...
    All offenses were VOID OF VICTIM, INCIDENT, ACCIDENT, and DAMAGED PARTY.
    After serving (6) years as a front-line Marine during the Iranian crisis (1979), (Before having a wife, children, and grandchildren) the return to civilian life was difficult... (Honorable Discharge )
    Can the Bruen decision help this 67-year-old United States Marine regain his gun right for family and home protection after 50 defenseless, prohibited years based on nexus with 18USC(g)(1)
    (g) It shall be unlawful for any person-
    (1) who has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
    Legally we are no longer part of "We the People"!
    When DUI offenses have NO victim, NO incident, NO accident, and NO damaged party, the 2nd Amendment "Right/Privilege" should never be "eternally prohibited"!
    - USMC (Semper Fidelis) SGT E-5 (5811)

  • @bc1830fam
    @bc1830fam 8 місяців тому

    I disagree with the emphasis on closing various types of gaps. If this means some groups or individuals accelerate away from others, so be it. It is my understanding that we benefit greatly from the culture and technology, which largely comes from those with Westen values and who have IQs over a 120. So I'm not okay diverting academic resources away from those that are cognitively gifted just so you can close gaps. Also, schools will naturally exacerbate gaps because individuals that are fast learners (high g) will accelerate away from the low g students. Schools don't need to close all the gaps. Don't throw all your money at the smart kids, and don't throw all your money at the slow ones either. It is especially important that you don't throw all your money at the students who are learning English as a second language. I'd hate for music, robotics, or archery classes to be deprioitized relative to special ed and ESL courses.

  • @turtletruth
    @turtletruth 2 місяці тому

    UNITED STATES (MICHIGAN) MARINE: (From Young-Marine to Man/Husband/Father, to Grandfather.)
    50 years ago, was my (3rd) third Non-Violent/Victimless DUI felony offense ...
    All offenses were VOID OF VICTIM, INCIDENT, ACCIDENT, and DAMAGED PARTY.
    After serving (6) years as a front-line Marine during the Iranian crisis (1979), (Before having a wife, children, and grandchildren) the return to civilian life was difficult... (Honorable Discharge )
    Can the Bruen decision help this 67-year-old United States Marine regain his gun right for family and home protection after 50 defenseless, prohibited years based on nexus with 18USC(g)(1)
    (g) It shall be unlawful for any person-
    (1) who has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
    Legally we are no longer part of "We the People"!
    When DUI offenses have NO victim, NO incident, NO accident, and NO damaged party, the 2nd Amendment "Right/Privilege" should never be "eternally prohibited"!
    - USMC (Semper Fidelis) SGT E-5 (5811)

  • @user-vg8cu5us9u
    @user-vg8cu5us9u 8 місяців тому

    Don’t forget the Irish