Why don't we ever see satellites from the ISS ? If there's that many up there surely we would be able to see them eventually wouldn't we? Just wondering.
Half_Finis Just wondering; how the earth can maintan its position on the space if earth is flat. And also, if tons of planet is flat, then why sometimes we got hit by an asteroid? (Cuz if planets is not moving, stand still like a statue; then Asteroid doesn't exist. Cuz Asteroid can travel as long as "Space does exist". If space does exist, then a planet must travell to maintain its position; otherwise it will collide with other planet at anytime)... Just wondering
ISS should equippe itself with laser, powerful and accurate enough to divert any incoming small objects towards it but not so strong that can damage other unintented objects
I'm still confused I used miles and my calculations come to 140k miles distance around the earth at 22k miles out in space making the speed necessary to travel that distance in a 24 hour day 5750 mph. Now this part is the more confusing how does the satellite compensate for the fact that the earth is traveling through space at apparently 66k miles per hour chasing the sun. I will stop there not considering the sun speed or milky way speed
Correct me if I am wrong but the satellite is set into place out in space and it is the earth rotation that is what people think is the satellite traveling at 17000 mph when it is not the satellite that is moving its just the earth is rotating in the center of all the satellites that stand still in space miles high of the earth is why no crashing into each other
speed of satellite is not depending on the earths rotation. its dependent upon the radius of orbit and the mass of the central body that the satellite is orbiting. basicaly higher the orbit, slower the orbital speed. so no, satellites dont stand still in space. if it stood still it would fall to the earth. it needs to have sideways motion thats fast enough relative to the distance of the planet and pull of gravity so it can "fall" but keep missing the surface because its sideways motion is fast enough. to simplify even more, if you have an object tied to a string of certain length. if you want that object to spin around you and keep to from touching the ground you will need to spin it at certain velocity that depends on the length of the string, to slow and it will fall. if the string is very long, the speed you are spinning it doesnt need to be very fast. but if you start shortening the string, speed must increase if you dont want to let it fall down. orbiting is similar to centrifuge. you want to keep the speed sideways so that you dont fall down, but do full circles or in this case elipses around the center.
1:37 That's actually not very accurate. It's mostly true for circular orbits, but two objects can have a high relative velocity at one point, if you consider elliptical orbits. Furthermore the two objects can have different inclinations. If the two objects have a relative inclination of pi, they can hit each other at any point in the orbit (assuming their RAAN and argument of periapsis lign up).
At 1:37 I was referring to circular orbits at the same orbit height above earth. Obviously it's a bit like going around the circumference of a circle. If you have two objects going the same speed they will never hit (assuming they're not heading towards each other.) That's why I said satellites are unlikely to hit the back of another satellite if they're orbiting around the same height around earth. Other sort of orbits do cause problems where they might collide, but in circular orbits it's quite unlikely if you have satellites heading the same way (which some don't so you might have side-on collisions like the collision between Iridium 33 and Kosmos-2251 on February 10, 2009. Thanks for the comment!
Well I guess the argument works for active satellite, but those (should at least in theory!!) have a low risk of colliding with other active satellites since they can actively avoid each other. There is a service at NORAD that informs the operator of a certain satellite that they will have a near miss in the next hours or days. Based on these collision risks (which always have a certain degree of uncertainty) the operators can plot a course correction. The bigger problem is unoperational satellites and general debris. And the debris will spread over all inclinations. In the aftermath of Iridium-Kosmos the particles emerging from that collision started out in one relatively narrow range of inclinations which spread to nearly every angle within a year. The various orbit pertubations cause these changes of the orbit parameters. You can rely on an active satellite staying on course, but that satellite will also be able to avoid other objects. The inactive stuff is the problem.
+Roger Wilco I get the sense you have some kind of personal grudge against me. That's gonna be fun. Would you like to discuss orbit mechanics? You see the point is that it's not accurate in general, only for a specific case. I guess I should have made that more clear, so even you can understand it...
Be smart, it's too hot up there even NASA says so, no cheap equipment will stand the heat... Did you do any research, use the internet you have to pros and the cons... figure it out can't stay too long up there, what goes up MUST come down ;anyway leave you to your dreams, the waking up will be too harsh for you.
+Duran Pierre we cant say they don't exist. its provide a lot of facilities to the modern world . But what is not exist , is that not rotating the earth like a ezekiel's wheel - and human never could find the end of the earth .
Geosynchronous orbit is at 35,786 kilometres (22,236 mi) which means high earth orbit is anything above this. If you look at this large image: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/82/Orbitalaltitudes.jpg/1920px-Orbitalaltitudes.jpg you will see that the blue part is low earth orbit, the green is medium and the blue is high earth orbit.
@@ardhiutama8426 Every experiment in history conducted to detect curvature or movement in the Earth has FAILED. Of course the Earth is flat - the evidence is overwhelming, but we've all been conditioned to deny our own senses & observations. That's why there's a globe in every classroom in the world - because INDOCTRINATION is the only way to get people to beLIEve something so ridiculous as 'water sticking to a ball, spinning at a thousand mile an hour' (centrifugal force makes that impossible).
look into the roads on holidays , ... there are not much satellite out there with the length of space . but one thing to understand , its traveling maybe with the equipment which not fly off into the space. one thing is sure it used a technique like in the hydrogen balloons. but someone say's it rotating the earth is absolutely crap .
Objects and it reflections are the stars or the reflection is like when you torch into the mirrors. All elements in the liquid form here itself in the earth. Cause all the elements in the water level having mass so its stay here itself by the returns of the rains except some elements that highly inflammable.
All the solid objects are having, different in colours. Yes, heat makes fire absolutely. The object is like white have producing the heat and black absorbed the light with the neutron. But the object of the black is giving the outcome with the opposite surfaces of its receiving. Thats why sun heats. Day after night. And carbon is toxic but works with the flouride. Thats why edges producing the Raibow its called doors of the opposite of the hell. Thats y baby's outcome through the puzzles. Since nature have seasons and offspring. Heat makes some elements to travel abroad into the space. By the chance of the helium sun is shining like independent elements. Chemistry and physics make mixing. It caused inequality in the nature. All is black and white. Who do believe, may the trees were the discovery of previous yuga which will not cause its death because of the roots....
how do they orbit at a speed of 27,600kph? the chances of them colliding is small because of speed? that's a silly way of thinking. the fact that they "exist" they must collide.
Shine Kibera Just simple logic bruuhhh; Theres hundreds and thousands of bullet fly on the air (not just 1 or 2 like Satellite on the space).. If they keep colliding to each other,, how to shot down the target with Machine gun vs Machine gun for the example?
Shine Kibera Now,, think about it; if there's only 1 or 2 bullet flying to each other on the air (with a high speed), how likely they will collide to each other??
I'm not that intelligent but I love listening to intelligent people.
Cool video! You should make more! It was really quick to go through all your videos man :(
And meteorites not in the equation,.. ?
my teacher sent me this i said, ''why do we not crash into anything''? this is what i get
So basically, no contingencies. Just relying on luck.
Why don't we ever see satellites from the ISS ? If there's that many up there surely we would be able to see them eventually wouldn't we? Just wondering.
because all "satelites" are actually just weather balloons.
Also the earth is flat.
Half_Finis Just wondering; how the earth can maintan its position on the space if earth is flat. And also, if tons of planet is flat, then why sometimes we got hit by an asteroid? (Cuz if planets is not moving, stand still like a statue; then Asteroid doesn't exist. Cuz Asteroid can travel as long as "Space does exist". If space does exist, then a planet must travell to maintain its position; otherwise it will collide with other planet at anytime)...
Just wondering
@@ardhiutama8426 Space is science fiction, just like NASA is.
I don't get why people on this channel seem to think that satellites are fake lol
The world is full of idiots with minds crippled by the scale of the universe.
Umm....because they ARE FAKE!
@@ancelrick5396 I agree - just look how many think they live on a spinning ball with an invisible curvature lol.
@@Sharonacam These people ... they make me sick. They damn well know we live on a damned line. Not a plane, not a sphere. A line. That's it.
Why are there so many people in the comments who don't believe in anything...
They've all been indoctrinated into SCIENTISM - the world's biggest religion.
most of them are flat earth blvs aka conservative christians and ofcrs muslims! Lol
I BELIEVE IN ALLAH (GOD) !!!
ISS should equippe itself with laser, powerful and accurate enough to divert any incoming small objects towards it but not so strong that can damage other unintented objects
Look - even the thumbnail image on this video is CGI - I rest my case.
I'm still confused I used miles and my calculations come to 140k miles distance around the earth at 22k miles out in space making the speed necessary to travel that distance in a 24 hour day 5750 mph. Now this part is the more confusing how does the satellite compensate for the fact that the earth is traveling through space at apparently 66k miles per hour chasing the sun. I will stop there not considering the sun speed or milky way speed
Raymond Lemieux what happened to the sun ray. The in normals amounts of heat hitting the satellite and it don't melt. Bs
Yea It takes little study to clearly see that using the Scientism values that everything derived is pure Dogma to explain satellites ...
+Raymond Lemieux It doesn't have to.
Earth is stationary.
Gravity so strong that it grabs satellite and munch munch munch munch munch
great video!
Thank you very much! :)
What's a "football perch"? 0:21
Pitch
like soccer?
Correct me if I am wrong but the satellite is set into place out in space and it is the earth rotation that is what people think is the satellite traveling at 17000 mph when it is not the satellite that is moving its just the earth is rotating in the center of all the satellites that stand still in space miles high of the earth is why no crashing into each other
speed of satellite is not depending on the earths rotation.
its dependent upon the radius of orbit and the mass of the central body that the satellite is orbiting.
basicaly higher the orbit, slower the orbital speed.
so no, satellites dont stand still in space.
if it stood still it would fall to the earth.
it needs to have sideways motion thats fast enough relative to the distance of the planet and pull of gravity so it can "fall" but keep missing the surface because its sideways motion is fast enough.
to simplify even more, if you have an object tied to a string of certain length.
if you want that object to spin around you and keep to from touching the ground you will need to spin it at certain velocity that depends on the length of the string,
to slow and it will fall.
if the string is very long, the speed you are spinning it doesnt need to be very fast.
but if you start shortening the string, speed must increase if you dont want to let it fall down.
orbiting is similar to centrifuge.
you want to keep the speed sideways so that you dont fall down, but do full circles or in this case elipses around the center.
2020 check
1:37 That's actually not very accurate. It's mostly true for circular orbits, but two objects can have a high relative velocity at one point, if you consider elliptical orbits.
Furthermore the two objects can have different inclinations. If the two objects have a relative inclination of pi, they can hit each other at any point in the orbit (assuming their RAAN and argument of periapsis lign up).
At 1:37 I was referring to circular orbits at the same orbit height above earth. Obviously it's a bit like going around the circumference of a circle. If you have two objects going the same speed they will never hit (assuming they're not heading towards each other.) That's why I said satellites are unlikely to hit the back of another satellite if they're orbiting around the same height around earth.
Other sort of orbits do cause problems where they might collide, but in circular orbits it's quite unlikely if you have satellites heading the same way (which some don't so you might have side-on collisions like the collision between Iridium 33 and Kosmos-2251 on February 10, 2009.
Thanks for the comment!
Well I guess the argument works for active satellite, but those (should at least in theory!!) have a low risk of colliding with other active satellites since they can actively avoid each other. There is a service at NORAD that informs the operator of a certain satellite that they will have a near miss in the next hours or days. Based on these collision risks (which always have a certain degree of uncertainty) the operators can plot a course correction.
The bigger problem is unoperational satellites and general debris. And the debris will spread over all inclinations. In the aftermath of Iridium-Kosmos the particles emerging from that collision started out in one relatively narrow range of inclinations which spread to nearly every angle within a year. The various orbit pertubations cause these changes of the orbit parameters.
You can rely on an active satellite staying on course, but that satellite will also be able to avoid other objects. The inactive stuff is the problem.
radialwellendichtrin Yes. Considering all satellites are using about 0.0000000000005% of available orbit space, there's a lot of space between them.
radialwellendichtrin Wake up, Helllllllooooooo, Earth is flat !!!!!!!!!!!
+Roger Wilco
I get the sense you have some kind of personal grudge against me. That's gonna be fun. Would you like to discuss orbit mechanics?
You see the point is that it's not accurate in general, only for a specific case.
I guess I should have made that more clear, so even you can understand it...
They don't fall, 'cause they don't exist !!!
Be smart, it's too hot up there even NASA says so, no cheap equipment will stand the heat...
Did you do any research, use the internet you have to pros and the cons... figure it out can't stay too long up there, what goes up MUST come down ;anyway leave you to your dreams, the waking up will be too harsh for you.
Duran Pierre I can't tell if you're trolling or being serious?
PowerBago
Go to my channel and you'll see.
You must be trolling since you've got nothing on your channel !!!
opmike343
You are what you just said !!!
+Duran Pierre we cant say they don't exist. its provide a lot of facilities to the modern world . But what is not exist , is that not rotating the earth like a ezekiel's wheel - and human never could find the end of the earth .
Its not "Hight Earth Orbit" Its called a Geostationary Orbit,
Geosynchronous orbit is at 35,786 kilometres (22,236 mi) which means high earth orbit is anything above this. If you look at this large image: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/82/Orbitalaltitudes.jpg/1920px-Orbitalaltitudes.jpg you will see that the blue part is low earth orbit, the green is medium and the blue is high earth orbit.
Jamie Hamilton bs
What it ACTUALLY IS ....IMAGINARY orbit.
Flat earth society be like; "Nahh, that's fake" 😂
Flat Earth society is 'controlled opposition' - which in itself proves that this truth is HEAVILY GUARDED!
Sharona McArdle
Right. So what's your point behind that? The earth is flat?
@@ardhiutama8426 That 'controlled opposition' to co-opt flat-Earthers would not exist, unless of course the Earth IS ACTUALLY FLAT.
@@ardhiutama8426 Every experiment in history conducted to detect curvature or movement in the Earth has FAILED.
Of course the Earth is flat - the evidence is overwhelming, but we've all been conditioned to deny our own senses & observations.
That's why there's a globe in every classroom in the world - because INDOCTRINATION is the only way to get people to beLIEve something so ridiculous as 'water sticking to a ball, spinning at a thousand mile an hour' (centrifugal force makes that impossible).
over thousand satellites but for some reason you can't find one real picture, only cartoon and cgi.
Yeah we can find a FEW...but people call it CGI
look into the roads on holidays , ... there are not much satellite out there with the length of space . but one thing to understand , its traveling maybe with the equipment which not fly off into the space. one thing is sure it used a technique like in the hydrogen balloons. but someone say's it rotating the earth is absolutely crap .
Are you saying satellites don't orbit earth?
***** hi, before u ask that question, you must ensure that if the earth is in the orbit...
There is no concept like planets. Only one planet and with its puzzle is earth
Objects and it reflections are the stars or the reflection is like when you torch into the mirrors. All elements in the liquid form here itself in the earth. Cause all the elements in the water level having mass so its stay here itself by the returns of the rains except some elements that highly inflammable.
All the solid objects are having, different in colours. Yes, heat makes fire absolutely. The object is like white have producing the heat and black absorbed the light with the neutron. But the object of the black is giving the outcome with the opposite surfaces of its receiving. Thats why sun heats. Day after night. And carbon is toxic but works with the flouride. Thats why edges producing the Raibow its called doors of the opposite of the hell. Thats y baby's outcome through the puzzles. Since nature have seasons and offspring. Heat makes some elements to travel abroad into the space. By the chance of the helium sun is shining like independent elements. Chemistry and physics make mixing. It caused inequality in the nature. All is black and white. Who do believe, may the trees were the discovery of previous yuga which will not cause its death because of the roots....
By the way the east is heaven and west is the hell. North and south are multitude. Think if earth as spherical.
There is no such thing as "hell" and "heaven".
@@mrymrgrtdns There is, you just need to use level cheats. Bet you didn't know that.
Whole channel is a complete rip off of AsapScience
Earth is spiral! follow me my spiral earthers! 😎
No, earth is flat
@@danko5866 blow it then
how do they orbit at a speed of 27,600kph? the chances of them colliding is small because of speed? that's a silly way of thinking. the fact that they "exist" they must collide.
Shine Kibera Just tell me; Why hundreds and thousands of bullet didn't collide to each other in WWI & WWII??? Because bullet doesn't exist??
Ardhi Utama who proved to you they didn't collide?
Shine Kibera Just simple logic bruuhhh; Theres hundreds and thousands of bullet fly on the air (not just 1 or 2 like Satellite on the space).. If they keep colliding to each other,, how to shot down the target with Machine gun vs Machine gun for the example?
Shine Kibera Now,, think about it; if there's only 1 or 2 bullet flying to each other on the air (with a high speed), how likely they will collide to each other??
Shine Kibera Sorry bro, but even a 5 year old kid can understand it faster. Cuz this thing is even simpler than how can i fart at anytime
#PolarUniverse
HARD TO UNDESTAND YOU, SOUNDS LIKE YOUR HOLDING YOUR NOSE WITH THAT BRITISH ACCENT !!
Sorry! Is just the way I talk. I've tried to slow down my speed in the latest video I uploaded today.
did anyone else find the bg music distracting and loud?