Polynomial remainder theorem | Polynomial and rational functions | Algebra II | Khan Academy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 лис 2014
  • Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing-and saving your progress-now: www.khanacademy.org/math/alge...
    Practice this lesson yourself on KhanAcademy.org right now:
    www.khanacademy.org/math/alge...
    Watch the next lesson: www.khanacademy.org/math/alge...
    Missed the previous lesson?
    www.khanacademy.org/math/alge...
    Algebra II on Khan Academy: Your studies in algebra 1 have built a solid foundation from which you can explore linear equations, inequalities, and functions. In algebra 2 we build upon that foundation and not only extend our knowledge of algebra 1, but slowly become capable of tackling the BIG questions of the universe. We'll again touch on systems of equations, inequalities, and functions...but we'll also address exponential and logarithmic functions, logarithms, imaginary and complex numbers, conic sections, and matrices. Don't let these big words intimidate you. We're on this journey with you!
    About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
    For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
    Subscribe to Khan Academy’s Algebra II channel:
    / channel
    Subscribe to Khan Academy: ua-cam.com/users/subscription_...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 149

  • @marissa1373
    @marissa1373 4 роки тому +139

    I was on the verge of tears during class because I didn’t understand this, but after watching 4 mins of this video it makes so much sense!!

  • @viacheddar
    @viacheddar 8 років тому +124

    Bless your souls at khan academy

  • @SuperDecimator
    @SuperDecimator 9 років тому +127

    Dear Khan,
    I guess I'll write it like a letter since the first comment was like that. Keep up the good work, you are much easier to understand than textbook lingo, and the colors are such a nice touch compared to whiteboards and black/white.
    Thanks much,
    A fan

    • @rhythm3869
      @rhythm3869 6 років тому +6

      Anthony Cancellieri
      Youre welcome,
      An aircon

    • @icoudntfindaname
      @icoudntfindaname 3 роки тому +2

      i wanted to like but u have 69 likes

    • @nitronight411
      @nitronight411 3 роки тому +1

      @@icoudntfindaname lemme do that 70.likes

  • @silaeraslan766
    @silaeraslan766 3 роки тому +31

    Sir,
    You make math seem simple.
    You have helped me more then you can ever know.
    Thank you and bless your soul.

  • @nameless4630
    @nameless4630 8 років тому +8

    dear Khan,
    this video helped me a lot and I understand this now so thank you so much! btw I love your voiceee
    yours sincerely,
    a fan

  • @freakerzzzx
    @freakerzzzx 8 років тому +34

    exam tomorrow! this is one of the lessons!

  • @clevergirl4457
    @clevergirl4457 4 роки тому +6

    This man and his initiative has saved a many lowly students from annihilation...
    Thank you so much Sal Khan!

    • @meh1561
      @meh1561 4 роки тому

      your not talking about salman khan are you?

  • @sankalpt5240
    @sankalpt5240 6 років тому +9

    It's midnight for me and still I'm watching it 😊

  • @ambarkranti3350
    @ambarkranti3350 5 років тому +3

    Love the tutorial...It makes math so easy to understand ! :)

  • @yxsh6920
    @yxsh6920 3 роки тому +9

    While byjus makes things more and more complicated with their so-called "visualization", Khan academy actually helps me understand concepts.

    • @biosavat9475
      @biosavat9475 3 роки тому +1

      Really ? I don't think so , byjus has really helped me for years especially for maths but I always watch Khan academy's videos for revision

    • @reyaanahmed3163
      @reyaanahmed3163 Рік тому

      True....

  • @einhacker-typ6457
    @einhacker-typ6457 8 років тому +3

    This was exactly what I was looking for!!!!! THANK YOUUUU

  • @arpangupta69420
    @arpangupta69420 3 роки тому

    Thanks for the video! I had a few doubts relating to this…all were cleared.

  • @susavanmondal4522
    @susavanmondal4522 2 роки тому

    He is teaching like other teacher but He is doing a magic to me Because after seeing his video I understood all the stuff. But before I was just struggling with that. ❤

  • @eswh8383
    @eswh8383 5 років тому

    Thank you Khan Academy for always helping me. 😀

  • @timothygreen158
    @timothygreen158 9 років тому +35

    Dear khan,
    I do synthetic division instead of this. I would greatly appreciate it if you could make a video about it because I am a little bit confused on this subject.
    Sincerely,
    A fan

    • @flitzmazers4052
      @flitzmazers4052 7 років тому +3

      yea synthetic division would be waay easier lol

    • @ari2102
      @ari2102 3 роки тому

      Agreed.

    • @chicagotypewriter2094
      @chicagotypewriter2094 Рік тому

      However, synthetic division can only be done on “x+-#” terms, long division can be done on anything
      But synthetic is so handy when the criteria is right!

  • @priyanshjain981
    @priyanshjain981 6 років тому

    I watched many videos but i am satisfied by your one...

  • @facetiousmarbles3539
    @facetiousmarbles3539 7 років тому +10

    1:02 seconds in and I understood EVERYTHING (About this). And I was sick for a whole week of polynomials too.

  • @lowlag
    @lowlag Рік тому

    thanks im in my precalc class this was an awesome video helpd a lot

  • @sirikilohit2077
    @sirikilohit2077 Рік тому

    WOW! In the first minute itself I've understood the remainder theorem!!!

  • @LockheartAesthetic
    @LockheartAesthetic 6 років тому +4

    So for everyone asking, f(1) came from f (a). If f(x) divided by (x-a) equals the equation that you are trying to solve, (x-1) is (x-a). So if (x-a) is what we use to find "a" then you only take the value for "a" and not the negative sign. This is because.... if "a" is negative, the sign will be positive and if "a" is positive the sign stays the same (negative) make sense? Example: if you are dividing by (x+2) then "a" is -2 because when you plug it in to (x-a) it looks like this (x-(-2)) which equals x+2. And if "a" is equal to 2 then plugged in to (x-a) it looks like (x-(2)) so x+2. Let me know if you need more help ^-^

    • @zaddydynamite
      @zaddydynamite 6 років тому

      Thanks! Makes sense but do you have any app i can communicate with you cause i need help on this

    • @lakshya1544
      @lakshya1544 6 років тому +1

      Hey I want some help,if it is like the way you are saying it is. Then how would we proof the theorem by taking (x+2) because If you have watched the proof video of the theorem, It is proved using (x-a).If you haven't watched you can watch. Please help.

    • @santoshsharma-or4zu
      @santoshsharma-or4zu 2 роки тому +1

      @Lockheart, can you please help me with the proof for the remainder theorem ? In the proof I don't understand why x is substituted with a.

  • @ComputerCurry
    @ComputerCurry 3 роки тому

    Great explanation from Sal Khan!

  • @KDUlearning
    @KDUlearning 3 місяці тому

    I get it easily from you Thank you ❤

  • @sundersourot4234
    @sundersourot4234 7 років тому +1

    thank you khan academy

  • @abigailsarah4879
    @abigailsarah4879 7 років тому +1

    really helpful

  • @tylerd8609
    @tylerd8609 6 років тому

    Thank you for existing

  • @padmap5415
    @padmap5415 5 років тому +6

    Math is fun and deadly

  • @omanakuttan6038
    @omanakuttan6038 3 роки тому

    Thanks sir...i get full in remainder theorem

  • @serenehari
    @serenehari 3 роки тому

    You saved my life, sir🙏

  • @uzairhussain4856
    @uzairhussain4856 2 роки тому

    great lecture...sweet wise

  • @riyathirukonda9397
    @riyathirukonda9397 Місяць тому +1

    I love you khan academy

  • @token0855
    @token0855 5 місяців тому

    youve saved me oh my god, i really cannot thank you enough

  • @anonymous___4999
    @anonymous___4999 6 років тому

    Thank u !

  • @josephpark9802
    @josephpark9802 7 років тому

    where were you khan academy....i was searching for this kind of thing and now I've found it.

  • @ShivHanuman
    @ShivHanuman Рік тому

    Thank you sir

  • @anoushkawadyalkar7514
    @anoushkawadyalkar7514 7 років тому

    is there any video for factor theorem n how can it be used for factorization?

  • @devinhead43
    @devinhead43 7 років тому

    You are a better teacher than my teacher

  • @tahmeenaakhtar3825
    @tahmeenaakhtar3825 7 років тому

    thanks sir

  • @horrordevil1413
    @horrordevil1413 2 місяці тому

    Long division in 3rd-4th grade?!😮 We were taught this (not even directly) in 7-8 grade. 😢😢 what a curriculum

  • @Brainrot69hd4k
    @Brainrot69hd4k 4 роки тому

    sir guy!!!!! hand off!!!!

  • @tantelou2996
    @tantelou2996 6 років тому +6

    Does the sign of "a" matter? What if it was divided by (x+1), would you use negative one when doing the theorem?

    • @karimhegazy3866
      @karimhegazy3866 6 років тому

      tante lou you can think of it as x-(-1)

    • @keshav2262
      @keshav2262 3 роки тому +1

      No, it is not like that you should take f(a) = -1 in this, because we take f(a) value, the root of polynomial x + a, i.e -a, or if it is x - a then, f(a) = a
      ✌️✌️
      Hope you like it

  • @olgamaria8975
    @olgamaria8975 3 роки тому +1

    Professors should link khan academy videos in their online classes instead of their monotonous colleagues that only solve the problem and don't explain anything

  • @presman2760
    @presman2760 4 роки тому +5

    I disagree polynomial long division is a terrible way to start my morning

  • @su1136
    @su1136 4 роки тому

    I really like your voice sir

  • @crontsquared230
    @crontsquared230 6 років тому

    What is the program you use? Also on what software?

  • @Natsumi170
    @Natsumi170 7 років тому

    Khan Academy uses Macs. Smart guys.

  • @roseb2105
    @roseb2105 4 роки тому

    is the idea that you getting rid of the variables by dividing their degrees until it ends up with x to the power of zero (which 1 so that way get rid of the x and if im getting rid of the x I say what value do i plug into the equation to make x zero and isolate R?

  • @md.ayaanahmed5152
    @md.ayaanahmed5152 2 роки тому +1

    "A little bit of polynomial long division is never a bad way to start your morning."

  • @fareehafazelkhan6976
    @fareehafazelkhan6976 8 років тому

    this means you can take a as 1 and replace directly in f(x) no need to carry out the long division,is it good?

    • @erik9817
      @erik9817 7 років тому

      Yes to obtain the remainder.

  • @snehalchougule7834
    @snehalchougule7834 6 років тому

    Really it's very helpful for me......thanks KHAN ACADEMY.........

  • @shivanksharma772
    @shivanksharma772 8 років тому

    factorise it (x2+px+1) is a factor of (ax3+bx+c). solve it and prove a2-c2=ab

  • @jesserealG
    @jesserealG 9 років тому +1

    late afternoon but good morning

  • @pointman6778
    @pointman6778 9 років тому +13

    Does long division get you to the same place as synthetic division?

    • @lolzlolzzxd
      @lolzlolzzxd 8 років тому +4

      yes. but synthetic division can only be used for linear factors, not quadratic factors

    • @thenotsobelligerentone
      @thenotsobelligerentone 8 років тому +5

      +Russell Tan You can use synthetic division for quadratic functions :)

    • @radhababu4710
      @radhababu4710 6 років тому

      yes

  • @beautifulhennessy
    @beautifulhennessy 5 місяців тому

    His voice>>>>>

  • @radhababu4710
    @radhababu4710 6 років тому

    liked it

  • @kabouch
    @kabouch 3 роки тому

    Since f(x)= (Factor 1.Factor 2)+ Remainder, and Factor 1= (x-a), (a) is a solution that ends up with Factor 1. Factor 2=o, and consequently, f(x) = Remainder

  • @snehalchougule7834
    @snehalchougule7834 6 років тому

    Do you have a video on topic 'French Revolution'?

    • @ari2102
      @ari2102 3 роки тому

      Viva la revolution

  • @ninadrangon
    @ninadrangon 6 років тому

    is this same as long division???

  • @fareehafazelkhan6976
    @fareehafazelkhan6976 8 років тому +1

    the long division is only for checking,right?

    • @kelseybee123
      @kelseybee123 7 років тому +1

      Faree Far It depends. You can do long division OR synthetic division. I do long division instead of synthetic division bc it's easier for me, but that's just my preference.

  • @HariKrishnan-bf4el
    @HariKrishnan-bf4el 2 роки тому

    adipoli :)

  • @Alvinrasher
    @Alvinrasher 3 роки тому

    Love u khan academy
    I m a memer

  • @panetrist
    @panetrist 5 років тому

    how did he do the last part to verify it?

  • @harshmittal1570
    @harshmittal1570 8 років тому +2

    Y can't I give more than one like😎😎😎😎

  • @swethasai6389
    @swethasai6389 4 роки тому

    Please say the definition of remainder theorem

  • @madrem
    @madrem 5 років тому +1

    Sal, why are we plugging in 1 into f(a) and then using that to substitute it into x

    • @hisyamhasbi8257
      @hisyamhasbi8257 4 роки тому +3

      In case other people are wondering... U can understand it better if you watch the khan video about polynomial division. Basically f(x) is equal to multiplication of its factors + its remainder.
      In other words,
      F(x) = (divider) (result) + remainder
      In case of this video,
      F(x) = (x-1) (result) + remainder
      X is a variable right... That equation is valid for all value of x. And the point of this theorem is that we can actually get remainder without knowing the exact value of result.
      In this case,
      F(x) = (x-1) (result) + remainder
      If we just assume x is 1... (we can assume it as anything tbh) then the equation becomes
      F(1) = (1-1) (result) + remainder
      F(1) = (0) (result) + remainder
      Since result times 0 is 0, the value of result doesnt matter right?
      F(1) = remainder
      Voila!

    • @hamxahaxer7828
      @hamxahaxer7828 3 роки тому

      @@hisyamhasbi8257 love you man!!!!

  • @reynardminas5171
    @reynardminas5171 2 роки тому

    How about the exponent??

  • @deshiyer7573
    @deshiyer7573 8 років тому +1

    thankthankthankyouyouyouyouyouyousosososososososososososososmuchmuchmuchmuch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @madrem
    @madrem 5 років тому

    Sal you also forgot to mention that x=a. Good video tho

  • @drharishdubey5471
    @drharishdubey5471 4 роки тому

    i am watching this while online class

  • @yohannesmeseker1354
    @yohannesmeseker1354 4 роки тому

    you are my best teacher but now day you are not uploading new videos

  • @BalaCliffDezjnr
    @BalaCliffDezjnr Рік тому

    Is it a -1 or just 1 ????

  • @gauravGupta-bk2sw
    @gauravGupta-bk2sw 11 місяців тому

    If f(x) is divided by x-a,remainder= f(a)😊

  • @CaribbeanCryptoTips
    @CaribbeanCryptoTips 2 роки тому

    Polynomial long division....not how I would start my morning lol

  • @ImThunder7
    @ImThunder7 3 роки тому

    what is the meaning of f(x)
    or something like f(""random letter"")
    and meaning of f
    random letter here can be (a,b,c,.......)

    • @simranchahal4811
      @simranchahal4811 3 роки тому

      f is a function , means f inputs x and outputs a .

  • @Chococat3646
    @Chococat3646 7 років тому

    I AM THE SMARTEST PERSON NOW

  • @pmcforever9686
    @pmcforever9686 4 роки тому

    can someone plz tell me what is causing the click sound @ 1:20

    • @ari2102
      @ari2102 3 роки тому

      This is more intresting than the video itself. I know for a fact that its not a pen because he is on a computer, it cant be hhis mouse as we cant hear it throughout the video so he must be using a drawing board pen that artist on paper use to make digital art which explains the handwriting so it must be the pen hitting the board a bit too hard but thats just a theory.

  • @maheenrida
    @maheenrida 4 роки тому +6

    No one:
    Him: "divisOHr"
    😂

  • @Jchinterior
    @Jchinterior 3 роки тому +1

    APEC LANG MALAKAS HAHAHHA

  • @shambhavi2191
    @shambhavi2191 4 роки тому

    I was wondering isn't a=-1 ?

  • @idirtyhands8957
    @idirtyhands8957 7 років тому +2

    "...we deserve a minor drum roll." hahahahha

  • @flapcow6837
    @flapcow6837 Рік тому

    its morning =

  • @mrprogamer896
    @mrprogamer896 7 років тому

    Become my teacher.plz.

  • @prantoshnaha5114
    @prantoshnaha5114 6 років тому

    But how do you determine the value of a???

    • @donuts4680
      @donuts4680 4 роки тому

      It’s where the divisor is

    • @ari2102
      @ari2102 3 роки тому

      You dont. The value of a is given

  • @mohammedthaier1718
    @mohammedthaier1718 2 роки тому

    It feels like magic

  • @JaffreyH
    @JaffreyH 6 років тому

    where did f(1) come from?

    • @iaexo
      @iaexo 6 років тому

      Jaffrey H the theorem says that the remainder should be f(a) when divided by x-a, and since in this case a=1, it would be f(1). Hope this helps!

  • @sandlasenkosingcobo2374
    @sandlasenkosingcobo2374 День тому

    Sal is goated🫡

  • @saintshaggy1372
    @saintshaggy1372 6 років тому

    It's a little wrong
    The remainder is f(x) which is 1 when x-1=0, as a = -1 not 1

    • @LockheartAesthetic
      @LockheartAesthetic 6 років тому +1

      So he is solving for the remainder, not for the roots, this problem essentially asks if x-1 is a root and if it is able to be factored evenly. The answer here is no so we don't solve for the roots. Also, solving for a is different than solving for x because x-1 is not equal to f(x) here, it is being divided by f(x) instead.

  • @papeeha3172
    @papeeha3172 7 років тому

    Tomorrow's my maths exam...wish me luck!😊☺

  • @StewV
    @StewV 2 роки тому

    yo i know your son he goes to my friends school

  • @rhythm3869
    @rhythm3869 6 років тому

    what if its ÷ (3x-1)???

    • @RunningPeas
      @RunningPeas 3 роки тому

      I dont know if you still need this but it never does

  • @rounaqqureshi7887
    @rounaqqureshi7887 Рік тому

    I was see in 2023

  • @jessicafelisha8161
    @jessicafelisha8161 6 років тому

    Why does f(1)=R come from X-1 but f(-1)=R come from X+1 shouldn't it just both be 1 cos (X-a) you're just taking the a value? I don't understand .:/

    • @LockheartAesthetic
      @LockheartAesthetic 6 років тому

      Jessica Felisha yes you take the a value only. If you had (x+2) then "a" would equal -2 because it has to be the opposite of the rule to make the rule work. If the remainder is 2 then you are dividing by (x-2) not (x+2). Make sense? Kind of like equations for circles when they ask you to find (h,k)

    • @LockheartAesthetic
      @LockheartAesthetic 6 років тому

      If a is -1 then you plug it in as (x-(-1)) which equals (x+1) if a is 1 then you plug it in (x-(1)) so (x-1) make sense? Sorry if it's too complicated I really want you to understand

  • @andresfigueroa3017
    @andresfigueroa3017 7 років тому +1

    It's asking me too find the remainder without using long division 😫😫

  • @scrapergaming609
    @scrapergaming609 3 роки тому

    Ggs

  • @dustynbennett3826
    @dustynbennett3826 7 років тому +21

    God loves you. I wanted you to know that. He sent his son to die on the cross for your sins. He rose again three days later so that through His life, death, burial and resurection we may have forgiveness of our sins and new life through Jesus Christ if we only ask him for forgiveness of our sins and believe in God and that Jesus is God's son, and also that God rose Him from the dead. and also confess Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior for ever more!

    • @anoushkawadyalkar7514
      @anoushkawadyalkar7514 7 років тому +20

      Dustyn Bennett why are you commenting this stuff on some educational video? go n search for some superstitious stuff and comment

    • @NishantSarkar
      @NishantSarkar 7 років тому +8

      there is no god

    • @adampartridge1903
      @adampartridge1903 7 років тому +10

      I reckon they're just showing their appreciation for this amazing educational content via telling Sal Khan that God and Jesus both love him

    • @sruli6137
      @sruli6137 5 років тому +2

      Kinda random place for this, no?

    • @samathajangam3649
      @samathajangam3649 3 роки тому

      Bruh

  • @allkindzzz9847
    @allkindzzz9847 6 років тому

    Khan died for our sins

  • @bloodorchidviper5225
    @bloodorchidviper5225 Рік тому

    ???

  • @kop7125
    @kop7125 8 років тому

    Boring? were's the skip button?

  • @kuleCristo
    @kuleCristo 2 роки тому

    if you already expect us to know how to do it why are you making a video about how to do it.

  • @nikhildabas2685
    @nikhildabas2685 4 роки тому

    bro why you talk so slow

    • @ari2102
      @ari2102 3 роки тому +1

      So people can understand properly

  • @TheFlxwer
    @TheFlxwer 7 років тому +1

    thank you khan academy