How Google responds to U.S. search warrants, while working hard to protect our users' privacy and security. Learn more about how we handle requests: google.com/tran...
Ььлдооос🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉ч😂😂😂😂дсдюж. Жвдбмвд жвдбммбддбвдбж🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉Вітаємо в буфері обміну Gboard. Скопійований текст зберігатиметься тут.Вітаємо в буфері обміну Gboard. Скопійований текст зберігатиметься туееее🎉а🎉 кп е🎉🎉(っ˘̩╭╮˘̩)っт.ттььб. 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 природного 🎉🎉🎉🎉каеееа🎉. 🎉🎉🎉епе🎉 на🎉кп🎉е🎉🎉😮
This all SOUNDS great... but if you notice, there was quite a frequent use of the word, "if". Like, if it looks like the data is being requested by the other guys, or if the warrant looks too vague, etc. That means Google may refuse or refine a warrant 60% of the time based on how it looks, or not give a damn and refuse or refine it 0.0000001% of the time. This all would still, technically, be true.
The "if" could just mean that most of the time warrants are issued correctly and appropriately. I would hope that is 99% of the time. I think you are reading too much into the "if".
Its nice to see that you are being a little more transparent about your processes in a human friendly way, and that you've provided a link out for more detailed information. Can't say this for every major corp out there. Thanks ;)
I'm sure there are powerful enough authority and systems out there that could skip this process without anyone ever knowing if they want to. But thanks for the cute animations to create that sense of security, even if it's fake.
*Google* has put up a video detailing how it works on User Data requests from Government agencies. Its fun and informative, not necessarily in that order. This is the meaning of being "transparent".
I don't get people who are STILL complaining about how Google "cooperates with the law" what do you want them to do, run an illegal company just so you don't have to worry about a potential search warrant? (You shouldn't worry if you haven't done anything)
Because it's "the law" doesn't mean that you have to cooperate (cf: world history : nazism, slavery were both allowed by the law). "You shouldn't worry if you haven't done anything" : I agree with you but it seems that the NSA doesn't make that distinction. Same for the US customs. Sorry but U.S is using the same tools as Dictatorship... Sad.
pilotex2011 still does not mean that Google should be breaking the law. They are doing their best to stop this from happening. May be you should sign their petition to help.
Look all i'm trying to say is, stop complaining about how Google follows the law. They protect their users as best as possible but they can't break the law for us.
Val Kukatov I understand your point, but on the other side, they break citizens rights. But whether your point of view or mine, people who are threat to the US wins by forcing the US to act this way don't you think ? US should show those people that they are not afraid.
Hmm... Google, how come this video was originally uploaded in 2014, but your logo changed in the video since the last time I saw. Both the "G" and the "Google" logo were not used in 2014. I also noticed some other things that were changed. You changing the video on w/o letting us know? Shouldn't that be re-uploaded w/ a new date?
Okay, that's how you serve a warrant in the USA, but what about if law enforcement in another country wants data generated from a user account based in the USA?
Then they will probably have to go through the US government. So basically the same process, but will probably only happen if we have a extradition law with that country requesting it.
Shout out to google for actually telling people how it is that they complete a process instead of keeping it to themselves. At least they tell you if your data is being used against you.
Nice job clearly articulating what you do. Your lawful help in issues like child safety, protection of victims, capturing of violent criminals, prevention of crime and in making it harder for hostile powers and terrorists to take advantage of us all are very important and good.
Since Google's obligation is ultimately to the corporation and the stockholder and not necessarily the user, but also since Google has the motto of not being evil, has it ever considered appointing a party to act as a sort of guardian ad litem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_guardian) to protect the privacy interests of the user? Just thinking aloud here... nice video.
; ) Shh.. they were counting on the bulk of the public assuming it's the same thing that's been in the news for months so the bulk can go back to assuming anything else is just a tinfoil-laced conspiracy theory. Shocked to see how many people are satisfied with this and went right back to that kind of thinking as easily as this spoonfeeding attempt to obscure the actual problem. I thought we already knew they generally bowed down to search warrants.
LMAO at the part where the judge carefully reviews the request. Also, if the NSA or FBI requests the info, as far as I know they pay google and have open access, no search warrant needed. If you want your private info private, don't use google services.
How about the question, "How does google deal with a National Security Letter"? How about the question, "What was accessed by the NSA's tap into the unencrypted internal private network between Google services"? Lastly, how many users were tracked on the internet using Googles' prefs cookie, because Google didn't serve it as a secure cookie?
Too bad 6 years working for Academi/Constellis Holdings taught me that this is BS. How it worked for us: Step 1 - Google we need all sensitive information on this individual. Step 2 - Google wont refuse because they have contracts with Academi/Constellis Holdings that they don't want to lose Step 3 - They give it to us Step 4 - ???? (I cant talk about that)
@@0xC When we get a security contract to protect individuals or to put together a target package for pickup, we have to know everything we can about the people around them in their life. This couod be well over 100 people. No way do we go through that entire process. It would take years. Google, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, even credit sites like Equinox are tied up in contracts with Constellis Holdings. They hand that information over without question.
How can anyone like this? If someone wants your email they should come to you, not your provider. That's some messed up back-door dealings. Accepting this is setting a precedent to allow avoiding you altogether. Kiss your rights goodbye, internet users. Your speech will be paid for instead of free yet, you won't see a dime.
If I'm ever hunted by the FBI I'll at least be happy knowing their is a well animated video explaining how they're going to undercover my search history.
What happens when the law enforcement agency that wants all the information on a user doesn't respond with a conveniently accommodating "that'll do" when asked to settle for part of it?
I am glad that you guys produced this leasson, there's trust on your intentions, and this can estimele us to think in smarter ways so solve some bugs that exists in this algorithm.
Alexander Rolli Its not as if KurdtStoo needs to say anything since many ISPs and search engine sites were outed for their involvement with the NSA recently. This is a poor attempt to save face when the evidence clearly supports the alternative hypothesis.
CravenTHC The NSA doesn't need Google's willingness/compliance to get data. They tap the data before it gets to Google and store what they can't decrypt. People need to wake up and realize that Google is on our side.
When they are. You're right about the NSA intercepting certain types of data, but they also performed warrant-less searches, some of which were not challenged. AT&T, Yahoo, and Google were a few of the names mentioned for having complied with warrant-less searches. Specifics were not mentioned, but you really shouldn't sit there and act like these companies are completely innocent.
The police are after murderers, tax evaders, extortioners, assaulters, rapers. Google is just trying to make $$$. It's good that the police have a way to solve crime. When you are victimised by someone, you'll be happy to know there is a party (i.e. the Police) there to help you, because Google won't care.
Yeah yeah that's with the government but why do all the adds in your page know if I'm going to buy a new phone or if I'm travelling to Paris and recommends me a hotel? Is that Google selling my search history?
Did anyone else catch the massive qualifier at the beginning---- "excessive" requests----? So most of the time, they just give the information out freely?
Yeah, why worry about a simple search. It's no big deal! Just go back to living your normal life with out worry for the small details. Everything will be all right.
Great question! One concern for me is constant government surveillance. Consider all of the laws you or friends have broken... smoking pot, drinking underage, speeding, threatening to harm someone (rhetorically or in a fit of rage), etc. In most cases, these crimes go unpunished, and nobody is harmed. There was little reason for the government to get involved. But, the easier you make it for the government to monitor you, the easier you make it for them to punish you.
The article has useful information, but I'm not talking about public surveillance video, I'm talking about our private info gathered around the web, being given to outside sources (the police department for example.) You're right about considering all the laws my friends have broken or I myself...but I can stand proud and say I have done no such thing as break the law. As for my friends, I can't say for I do not know. The thing is, all the people complaining about search warrants, makes me believe that they have or will break the law. If one is innocent, why worry about a search?
As I also may add, such a search is not used for everything. Perhaps there are people who are breaking the law right now, but they are minor acts...which will probably not show up on anyone's radar. I would like to believe that our information across the web from sites like Facebook or Google...would be given in cases of much seriousness.
Robert lemiesz Yes and at no point during the process does it ever say the producer or screener tell you about the logistical decisions they make while they are deciding on what content of yours to share based on the case, all it says is that the user is "notified" that federal authorities want information, but they are not told specifically "which content" the producers decide to give out.
Not even that: the user is notified that federal authorities want information, "if legal and appropriate". It is common for the courts to forbid anyone involved from notifying the target. With no numbers given, it's reasonable to suspect that the vast majority of targeted users are never informed that their private data was handed over, nor even requested.
did any one else thought it said, "Way Of A Walmart.' honestly they should post a video about the way of Walmart, such as how last week my dad got lost trying to find his Red Bull.
1) care to prove that you actually go through these steps? 2) doesnt the NSA's single search warrant for everyone's data mean that despite all this, we still have no privacy online?
The NSA didn't tell Google what they were doing. They certainly didn't have a warrant. Google couldn't have gone through these steps in that case. Big government was the criminal that day, not big business.
so a video like this is the perfect chance to tell us that this happened without their permission, ILLEGALLY. not pretend everything is fine, do you not see that this video is trying to pretend everything is alright and that our info is safe?
I love Google for fun yet informative adverts, searches and great platforms for content like UA-cam. This is one of the reasons that they are so popular, while every thing is white and seemingly dull, they are very fun and cool =D
I applaud Google if these types of precautions are always taken. Kudos! I talk about philosophical and societal issues and topics that help us grow as human beings. All I want is for us to embrace our humanity and our reality for all of its truths--the good and the bad. This life is a gift.. death is a promise: so let us constantly overcome ourselves to be something more. If you find me genuine, bring me your knowledge and life experiences so that we may both grow. That is all, no more no less. Good day to everyone:)
I appreciate (and want to believe in) Google's efforts towards transparency, but this video has little to do with transparency and a whole lot to do with reassurance and public image. Although the video reassures us that Google attempts to minimize overreach and violations of privacy, there is nothing to corroborate these claims. The only information I've found that they've released shows that Google produces "some data" in response to 83% of U.S. warrants. What kind of data, how limited, how often they "narrow" the warrant, and all the other things talked about in this video we just have to take their word on. That is hardly transparency.
You don't see Facebook trying to explain this type of stuff to its users.
That's because Facebook hands user info out like it's no big deal.
I loved this!
I understand this a lot more now because of where I work.
This was an excellent and cute way to break it down
Scotty same
Well at least they have the decency to not pretend they do all the stuff Google says they do themselves
At 3:18 how is there the new Google logo, when it was released in September 2015, but this video came out in May 2014?
+Jesal Gandhi They probably added the new logo and re-uploaded the video, super users the ability to do that
Almost forgot that they're the OP of the internet pretty much.
Kevin Le Gfhqjhwhjwu1yqtqg w qay.swa ve tg 58ui⛼🗽🎠💒💒🏩🕍💒🌁🕍🕍🌄🌌fyyyuyh2h !bhbhb vvv
Bir ¡》》》¤¤¤¤□●●□●●●▪¤□♤♤>>🌌🎠🗼🕍🏫🏪🕍 bu 🌁🀄 rfgftfr0rrrr45yü
Kevin Le 5 a5
At 0:13 The logo is there too
2:03 - "Yeah, that'll do" that is totally something the FBI would say in that case.
AlmightyJesus
ExtraFuntime
ExtraFuntime co dai 8 tuoi
.
how can I transfer my apps to my SD card
Buddy Lasater dzjhjkh
You can't help but trust sentient wooden dolls.
BinkieMcFartnuggets as the+8axizi u
BinkieMcFartnuggets you
I see you everywhere, Binkie.
Fry
lol
I misread this and thought the title was "Way of a Walmart"
Jon Nat same
so did i
Jon Nat same
😹😂👌🔥💯
Jon Nat same
Probably the most entertaining (and informative) legal process video you've ever seen.
Stephen Holder 5th
Ььлдооос🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉ч😂😂😂😂дсдюж. Жвдбмвд жвдбммбддбвдбж🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉Вітаємо в буфері обміну Gboard. Скопійований текст зберігатиметься тут.Вітаємо в буфері обміну Gboard. Скопійований текст зберігатиметься туееее🎉а🎉 кп е🎉🎉(っ˘̩╭╮˘̩)っт.ттььб. 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 природного 🎉🎉🎉🎉каеееа🎉. 🎉🎉🎉епе🎉 на🎉кп🎉е🎉🎉😮
@@nicholsfamily0416123
This all SOUNDS great... but if you notice, there was quite a frequent use of the word, "if". Like, if it looks like the data is being requested by the other guys, or if the warrant looks too vague, etc. That means Google may refuse or refine a warrant 60% of the time based on how it looks, or not give a damn and refuse or refine it 0.0000001% of the time. This all would still, technically, be true.
The "if" could just mean that most of the time warrants are issued correctly and appropriately. I would hope that is 99% of the time. I think you are reading too much into the "if".
Arm4g3dd0nX ٢٥ض٢٣٥ق٢ث٤٢٤
Haha I love how "The Other Guys" ever so sliiiiightly looks like a Facebook jab.
I just wish all the terms and conditions were explained in this format! Cool video! Nice job!
Its nice to see that you are being a little more transparent about your processes in a human friendly way, and that you've provided a link out for more detailed information. Can't say this for every major corp out there. Thanks ;)
how have the times changed
0:47 @@ghajik.
I'm sure there are powerful enough authority and systems out there that could skip this process without anyone ever knowing if they want to. But thanks for the cute animations to create that sense of security, even if it's fake.
This is a really great explanation of how Google deals with search warrant. A lot of effort goes into protecting the users privacy!
I don't understand anything they're saying, but I like watching the little people walk around😊
*Google* has put up a video detailing how it works on User Data requests from Government agencies. Its fun and informative, not necessarily in that order.
This is the meaning of being "transparent".
Kickstarter: 'Way of a Warrant' Board Game
Dude I want this
I don't get people who are STILL complaining about how Google "cooperates with the law" what do you want them to do, run an illegal company just so you don't have to worry about a potential search warrant? (You shouldn't worry if you haven't done anything)
Because it's "the law" doesn't mean that you have to cooperate (cf: world history : nazism, slavery were both allowed by the law).
"You shouldn't worry if you haven't done anything" : I agree with you but it seems that the NSA doesn't make that distinction. Same for the US customs.
Sorry but U.S is using the same tools as Dictatorship... Sad.
pilotex2011 still does not mean that Google should be breaking the law. They are doing their best to stop this from happening. May be you should sign their petition to help.
Look all i'm trying to say is, stop complaining about how Google follows the law. They protect their users as best as possible but they can't break the law for us.
Nick Orie Who asked them to break what law exactly?
Val Kukatov I understand your point, but on the other side, they break citizens rights. But whether your point of view or mine, people who are threat to the US wins by forcing the US to act this way don't you think ? US should show those people that they are not afraid.
2:36 This man goes all the way around the world to go to a place that was walking distance
Im glad Google is stepping up to show users EXACTLY how their data is being given over to investigators. Job well done.
This is all fine and dandy, unless it comes from the FISA, then the user will never know and Google can't deny it or narrow it down.
Seems legit. I trust you now, Google.
U tube video bad videos wars Kells.
Genocide videos
@@nikitaspratt5736 Shut up.
de @@nikitaspratt5736s
When the impostor is sus! 😳
Very nice! I am a bit curious how this applies to non us citizens?
Hmm... Google, how come this video was originally uploaded in 2014, but your logo changed in the video since the last time I saw. Both the "G" and the "Google" logo were not used in 2014. I also noticed some other things that were changed. You changing the video on w/o letting us know? Shouldn't that be re-uploaded w/ a new date?
Mark Jorgensen t Highbury
Okay, that's how you serve a warrant in the USA, but what about if law enforcement in another country wants data generated from a user account based in the USA?
Then they will probably have to go through the US government. So basically the same process, but will probably only happen if we have a extradition law with that country requesting it.
blackturtleshow hair
blackturtleshow u:
blackturtleshow 💇
x cu : type
Shout out to google for actually telling people how it is that they complete a process instead of keeping it to themselves. At least they tell you if your data is being used against you.
Nice job clearly articulating what you do. Your lawful help in issues like child safety, protection of victims, capturing of violent criminals, prevention of crime and in making it harder for hostile powers and terrorists to take advantage of us all are very important and good.
I thought I saw Dora getting arrested by some random agent or spy on the thumbnail
This video is helpful for our clients in understanding how the police or State can access your electronic information from Google through a warrant.
Q
Hahaha when the producer had to go court and authenticate and went blah blah blah!! That was so funny! Oh, plus, the summary and the cow, lol!
OMG "whys the cow here" "nice mustace" nice google
"Whats that cow doing here?" .... "Nice Mustache"
this would be a great education video for schools
je me
demande
Shorouk
Eddie Jones ejjhgh
Eddie Jo..nl
The cow was the best part of the whole video, and I loved the little people :)
1:48 my google home actually turned on in this part
Since Google's obligation is ultimately to the corporation and the stockholder and not necessarily the user, but also since Google has the motto of not being evil, has it ever considered appointing a party to act as a sort of guardian ad litem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_guardian) to protect the privacy interests of the user? Just thinking aloud here... nice video.
This is how you respond to a search warrant. How do you respond to Patriot Act requests?
; )
Shh.. they were counting on the bulk of the public assuming it's the same thing that's been in the news for months so the bulk can go back to assuming anything else is just a tinfoil-laced conspiracy theory. Shocked to see how many people are satisfied with this and went right back to that kind of thinking as easily as this spoonfeeding attempt to obscure the actual problem. I thought we already knew they generally bowed down to search warrants.
I agree. Packaging the whole thing in this "cute and playful" manner is insulting as well, but people buy it!
+Gordon Tendick this whole thread is so painfully true xP
Gordon Tendick =\ zz cf tt fee222 w questions_211_1 si Suu c ah zip u 0 for .
Heywood Yabloome 78th irkeirjkk3k4kj4
I love how Google has a sense of humor, but can still be serious. I love Google.
Hey
Aero 8
Love me
LMAO at the part where the judge carefully reviews the request. Also, if the NSA or FBI requests the info, as far as I know they pay google and have open access, no search warrant needed. If you want your private info private, don't use google services.
If you want your private info private, don't use the internet... or technology at all just to be safe.
BUT are there any loopholes via an app & permissions that could be exploited?
Is there any hope of stopping the NSA?
Yes, I've messaged you twice already but they keep deleting it. So I'll tell you again.. hold somebody is knocking on the door brb
***** I went back actually checked my messages at first. That's funny part LOL
This is interesting and educational. Nice to know Google respects the private information we have, and will only give it out in the most careful way.
I dont have a problem with google or police seeing my data.
Veiko Heiberg
How about the question, "How does google deal with a National Security Letter"?
How about the question, "What was accessed by the NSA's tap into the unencrypted internal private network between Google services"?
Lastly, how many users were tracked on the internet using Googles' prefs cookie, because Google didn't serve it as a secure cookie?
Difjfivrntb%Mr
Rmkrhrjk
Bfkrjrrjkrl
thanks for making this stuff into a kids show. We know you are benevolent, innocent and good spirited now
It’s a way to dumb it down and make it interesting google style, you understood didn’t you?
"what's the cow doing here?" 3:00 lol
Bernadette gorecki
Interested how this will work internationally... as Google has an international userbase...
lactobacillusprime x"iu >,&&
lactobacillusprime
Too bad 6 years working for Academi/Constellis Holdings taught me that this is BS.
How it worked for us:
Step 1 - Google we need all sensitive information on this individual.
Step 2 - Google wont refuse because they have contracts with Academi/Constellis Holdings that they don't want to lose
Step 3 - They give it to us
Step 4 - ???? (I cant talk about that)
Thanks for this information, Sister Fister 69.
@@0xC When we get a security contract to protect individuals or to put together a target package for pickup, we have to know everything we can about the people around them in their life. This couod be well over 100 people. No way do we go through that entire process. It would take years. Google, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, even credit sites like Equinox are tied up in contracts with Constellis Holdings. They hand that information over without question.
I love how this was presented
Pi
... Jj..
8kk?
.. Jbnn
M. 8in jjb. R tb!..
Yt.
The. I9c.. N b no9. In89
@@malik123yaadna na
@@malik123yaad hggugguggggugugfhhuughhugggugugghgguguguggugggugfggggcgfgfg
How can anyone like this? If someone wants your email they should come to you, not your provider. That's some messed up back-door dealings. Accepting this is setting a precedent to allow avoiding you altogether. Kiss your rights goodbye, internet users. Your speech will be paid for instead of free yet, you won't see a dime.
Well so dosen't google "notify" the users?
+Mreverything11 but it says that in the video...
If I'm ever hunted by the FBI I'll at least be happy knowing their is a well animated video explaining how they're going to undercover my search history.
And we can thank for all of this to Edward Snowden, not Google.
This is the process they had in place before people even knew Snowden's name.
Peter Sitterly abb
Nk
Cea mai tare din parcare
If you listen to a bird as it goes over Wal-Mart the way of it is cheep-cheep!
3:01 Hey, that's ME!!!!!! I'm famous!!!!
What happens when the law enforcement agency that wants all the information on a user doesn't respond with a conveniently accommodating "that'll do" when asked to settle for part of it?
Finally, Google explain about their warrant.
Well so something issue or involve about the warrants .. ohh yes!! I'm sure very nice too!!👍☺
And Apple will get a lawsuit for not giving FBI information
Imagine believing that they do anything to "narrow the scope" and don't just give the authorities literally everything they asked for. Lmao
Thanks for explaining this in layman's terms. Every company should do this,
I came here to know if you have stolen my data
I am glad that you guys produced this leasson, there's trust on your intentions, and this can estimele us to think in smarter ways so solve some bugs that exists in this algorithm.
Woah! This bullshit you're feeding us sure looks delicious! Thank you Google!
They are saying more than you are.
Alexander Rolli Its not as if KurdtStoo needs to say anything since many ISPs and search engine sites were outed for their involvement with the NSA recently. This is a poor attempt to save face when the evidence clearly supports the alternative hypothesis.
CravenTHC The NSA doesn't need Google's willingness/compliance to get data. They tap the data before it gets to Google and store what they can't decrypt.
People need to wake up and realize that Google is on our side.
When they are.
You're right about the NSA intercepting certain types of data, but they also performed warrant-less searches, some of which were not challenged. AT&T, Yahoo, and Google were a few of the names mentioned for having complied with warrant-less searches. Specifics were not mentioned, but you really shouldn't sit there and act like these companies are completely innocent.
No they aren't all innocent,, but it's hard to resist the weight of the government and "patriotic duty"
They have to comply and are gagged.
"What's the cow doing here?" OMG I laughed my head off xD
Link dip 我的❤心情不错(⊙o⊙)
Link dip
|
an attempt for a false sense of security
Get lost, tinfoil virgin.
The cow at the end was so cute!
Why are people afraid that the government is going to search their account unless you did something bad?
nudes of themselves they have sent to their lovers... duh!
4th amendment
We're not afraid, we just don't like people talking behind our backs.
because the NSA gathers everyone's data illegally, without getting a proper warrant or asking google
Build a house with glass walls, including these of your toilet, because you have nothing to hide. :)
best april fools google prank.
Good to know that Google doesn't just "bow down" to the Government.
The police are after murderers, tax evaders, extortioners, assaulters, rapers. Google is just trying to make $$$. It's good that the police have a way to solve crime. When you are victimised by someone, you'll be happy to know there is a party (i.e. the Police) there to help you, because Google won't care.
Yeah yeah that's with the government but why do all the adds in your page know if I'm going to buy a new phone or if I'm travelling to Paris and recommends me a hotel? Is that Google selling my search history?
sure.. that's what they do
Did anyone else catch the massive qualifier at the beginning---- "excessive" requests----?
So most of the time, they just give the information out freely?
Josh Fwlori
A nice ad on how Google handles data requests in the United States.
"Everything is done accurately," he says while the puppet just hits random buttons on a machine.
+MrDontAsk3 True.
Anyone else binge-watching company videos at 3AM?
What's the big deal? Unless you consider yourself to be a suspect of something big, then, why worry over a simple search?
Yeah, why worry about a simple search. It's no big deal! Just go back to living your normal life with out worry for the small details. Everything will be all right.
Great question! One concern for me is constant government surveillance. Consider all of the laws you or friends have broken... smoking pot, drinking underage, speeding, threatening to harm someone (rhetorically or in a fit of rage), etc. In most cases, these crimes go unpunished, and nobody is harmed. There was little reason for the government to get involved. But, the easier you make it for the government to monitor you, the easier you make it for them to punish you.
Here's a much better article on the subject... www.aclu.org/technology-and-liberty/whats-wrong-public-video-surveillance
The article has useful information, but I'm not talking about public surveillance video, I'm talking about our private info gathered around the web, being given to outside sources (the police department for example.) You're right about considering all the laws my friends have broken or I myself...but I can stand proud and say I have done no such thing as break the law. As for my friends, I can't say for I do not know. The thing is, all the people complaining about search warrants, makes me believe that they have or will break the law. If one is innocent, why worry about a search?
As I also may add, such a search is not used for everything. Perhaps there are people who are breaking the law right now, but they are minor acts...which will probably not show up on anyone's radar. I would like to believe that our information across the web from sites like Facebook or Google...would be given in cases of much seriousness.
I love how you guys make boring stuff like this interesting. For me, at least.
its nice to see googles humour
Is the user notified about ANY of the decisions that the conduits are making in the process while it's going on?
Did you even watch the video
Robert lemiesz Yes and at no point during the process does it ever say the producer or screener tell you about the logistical decisions they make while they are deciding on what content of yours to share based on the case, all it says is that the user is "notified" that federal authorities want information, but they are not told specifically "which content" the producers decide to give out.
Not even that: the user is notified that federal authorities want information, "if legal and appropriate". It is common for the courts to forbid anyone involved from notifying the target. With no numbers given, it's reasonable to suspect that the vast majority of targeted users are never informed that their private data was handed over, nor even requested.
Well if the courts forbid them... there really isnt anything google can do.
Blog post too: googleblog.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/transparency-report-requests-for-user.html
did any one else thought it said,
"Way Of A Walmart.' honestly they should post a video about the way of Walmart, such as how last week my dad got lost trying to find his Red Bull.
ok i am not in the us what will you do ?
Now I want one of those cow figurines!
Thanks for clearing this up.
Nukeclears and
So
What is NSA I believed you Google a hundred percent I love story picture books they're my favorite kind!!!
'you need... gmail, youtube, photos... ?'
nice to know it can be so easily harvested.
1) care to prove that you actually go through these steps?
2) doesnt the NSA's single search warrant for everyone's data mean that despite all this, we still have no privacy online?
***** I wouldn't blame that on Google... They do what they can
The NSA didn't tell Google what they were doing. They certainly didn't have a warrant. Google couldn't have gone through these steps in that case. Big government was the criminal that day, not big business.
no, google is still to blame, if NSA got past this procedure then whats the point of this video? it becomes void
so a video like this is the perfect chance to tell us that this happened without their permission, ILLEGALLY. not pretend everything is fine, do you not see that this video is trying to pretend everything is alright and that our info is safe?
the NSA is not all powerfull.
Best stop motion animation I've see.
Except when you're the NSA, then you get everything.
This is a hidden treasure i just found thank you google, i appreciate all the hard work was made
I like how you did the video, very informative.
What's the cow doing here?? Lmao
cool story bro. now what about meta data?
You are asking too many questions username LordStickMax. We will be in contact soon username LordStickMax.
Lackson Banda
I love Google for fun yet informative adverts, searches and great platforms for content like UA-cam. This is one of the reasons that they are so popular, while every thing is white and seemingly dull, they are very fun and cool =D
I applaud Google if these types of precautions are always taken. Kudos!
I talk about philosophical and societal issues and topics that help us grow as human beings. All I want is for us to embrace our humanity and our reality for all of its truths--the good and the bad. This life is a gift.. death is a promise: so let us constantly overcome ourselves to be something more. If you find me genuine, bring me your knowledge and life experiences so that we may both grow. That is all, no more no less. Good day to everyone:)
ofSix jh hi call
ofSix y
Stanbulu gelin
LOL, whats the cow doing here! at 3:00
This is honestly what I've always believed people who work at Google look like.
So thats why NSA built in backdoors so they would have no need of search warrant.
unless its the nsa...
No
I would be scared to death if I got an email from the government asking about my child...
6hu UO 0ui0089a roll zzz's ulis UO ul it huh. B m M by 7 h0
Good work Google. The last thing you'd wanna do is mistreat your customers.
I appreciate (and want to believe in) Google's efforts towards transparency, but this video has little to do with transparency and a whole lot to do with reassurance and public image. Although the video reassures us that Google attempts to minimize overreach and violations of privacy, there is nothing to corroborate these claims. The only information I've found that they've released shows that Google produces "some data" in response to 83% of U.S. warrants. What kind of data, how limited, how often they "narrow" the warrant, and all the other things talked about in this video we just have to take their word on. That is hardly transparency.
Nice Mustache.