ALL Architecture Styles Explained in 9 Minutes (History)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 бер 2024
  • Architecture Styles Explained in 9 Minutes. In this video we delve into the world of architecture showcasing and exploring different styles that shaped history.
    We are going to take a look at the following architectural building styles:
    Ancient Egyptian
    Ancient Greek
    Romanesque
    Gothic
    Renaissance
    Baroque
    Rococo
    Neoclassical
    Victorian
    Art Nouveau
    Arts and Crafts
    Modernism
    Art Deco
    Brutalism
    Postmodernism
    Byzantine
    Colonial
    Tudor
    Bauhaus
    Neofuturist
    Avant-garde
    Contemporary/Modern Architecture
    Why aren't we building nice things anymore? Let me know in the comments.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22

  • @MariaFernandaFelixGonzalez
    @MariaFernandaFelixGonzalez Місяць тому +2

    The columnar forms at the greek section are wrong

    • @ExplainersEnigma
      @ExplainersEnigma  Місяць тому

      Thanks for your comment! What's wrong about them Maria?

    • @LadyHeathen82
      @LadyHeathen82 20 днів тому

      @@ExplainersEnigmaNothing is wrong with. They’re messing with you.

    • @ExplainersEnigma
      @ExplainersEnigma  20 днів тому

      @@LadyHeathen82 Thanks Mylady

    • @anna-mariecarter7767
      @anna-mariecarter7767 9 днів тому +1

      No the corinthian and ionic are mixed up.@@LadyHeathen82

    • @anna-mariecarter7767
      @anna-mariecarter7767 9 днів тому

      corinthian and ionic are mixed up. @@ExplainersEnigma

  • @DeadeyeDaily
    @DeadeyeDaily Місяць тому

    Why use a photo of the vandalized Brandenburg gate? 🤔

    • @ExplainersEnigma
      @ExplainersEnigma  Місяць тому +1

      Where's that? Sorry, didn't know that was in a vandalized state there 🤔

    • @DeadeyeDaily
      @DeadeyeDaily Місяць тому

      @@ExplainersEnigma (My only criticism, though.) Great video! Very informative while super concise. Definitely a need for concise here on UA-cam IMO :D Wailri's dislike being neither valid or invalid, using lavish structures of elites is, at the very least, a trade-off. If I had to guess, that creative choice had everything to do with the fact that the examples are well known. Using something (most likely) familiar increases the likelihood that the new info will stick.

    • @ExplainersEnigma
      @ExplainersEnigma  Місяць тому

      @@DeadeyeDaily Spot on, that was the intent yes. Thanks for your feedback Deadeye!

  • @wailrimouche1171
    @wailrimouche1171 Місяць тому +3

    I understand that these catagorizations are the accepted norm in acedemia, but regardless of the Western centric aspect which I understand although should be pointed out. I dislike how this division focuses on lavish estates and structures of the elites rather than what most people lived in.

    • @ExplainersEnigma
      @ExplainersEnigma  Місяць тому +2

      Very fair point Wailri, I tried to cover just the general "themes" of the different styles.

    • @OctavianAsix
      @OctavianAsix 10 днів тому

      ​@@ExplainersEnigma great video

    • @ExplainersEnigma
      @ExplainersEnigma  10 днів тому

      @@OctavianAsix glad you like it Octavian!

  • @exchangAscribe
    @exchangAscribe 13 днів тому +1

    wheres early period east asian (japanese/chinese/korean/etc) styles? or medieval? or the dense impoverished slums that you can find in different parts of the middle east and india that have a distinct style? or american dream style? or the modern neon-littered cluttered style of modern asian mega cities? or moroccan? or adobe/pueblo style of the S.W. U.S.? or old norse viking architecture? or the collegiate architecture that is seen in many of the ivy-league colleges (and some non-ivy) across the U.S. and likely some colleges in europe? or even the wooden saloons that define old western towns?
    the video is fine but this is clearly not _all_ architecture styles, which i why we clicked the video. title is misleading and should be changed.

    • @ExplainersEnigma
      @ExplainersEnigma  13 днів тому

      You're 💯 right. We needed to exclude some styles, otherwise the video would've been too long to fit the format. We tried to cover a lot but it's impossible to show them all separately. Thanks for your feedback!

  • @sonicswife
    @sonicswife Місяць тому +1

    just western styles?...... i was waiting for more than specfic stuff like asian styles or the designs seeing on indigenus cultures of the americas, i feel like an idiot clicking videos where dont even try to elavorate further

    • @ExplainersEnigma
      @ExplainersEnigma  Місяць тому

      Hey Sonicswife I'm sorry we didn't cover all styles, it's tricky to fit them all in this kinda video. Hope you still enjoyed it. We tried to focus on the "main" styles that you find in the academic literature.

    • @sonicswife
      @sonicswife Місяць тому +1

      academic? that sounds like institutional bias to me

    • @r.daneel.90
      @r.daneel.90 20 днів тому

      Yes, you're an idiot, and not for clicking this video

    • @stihackaktoranestiha1732
      @stihackaktoranestiha1732 19 днів тому +1

      ​@@sonicswife bruh change the literature then and make the "specific stuff" more known.🤣🤣