As much as it pains me to defend religion, 3 people in this situation didn't _necessarily_ lie. They could honestly (but incorrectly) _believe_ they are telling the truth, based on what they can find out.
At worst you can say that somebody, in the past, knowingly lied in three of those cases. But I suppose they could be genuinely confused, or mentally ill also.
I had to put my response on video. Nevermind tl:dr, this might be tl:dw but please have a look and hit that like button? I think I had some really interesting thoughts. ua-cam.com/video/qWhsuy6IC6I/v-deo.html This one's for you, Evan.
Crusader : "...if your master helps us, he can participate in our quest for the spear of destiny..." Armenian soldier : "Okay I'll tell him, but I don't think he'll be interested, he's already got one you see..."
I’m reminded of a Mark Twain quote: The two most important days of your life are when you are born and when you figure out why. I do believe Evan has found his Why.
That is probably what we would like to believe. In reality he is probably still looking for the answer and probably he will continue to do so. Buddhists & historians say when Buddha attained enligthenment after the gruelling contemplation, he was asked by his disciples - what truth he had found. But he did not give any specific answer, and nowadays I am more inclined to believe that he did not have any specific answer. Sometimes I feel that our lives are just spent looking for answers and while we can spend fruitless hours trying to find those we can also decide to just ignore those recurring questions and carry on with our daily works, still there is no denying that those questions keep on returning and people needs to find answers to those because neither we are sure they are answerable nor we are convinced they are not. This situation has risen probably because human beings are at present at the top of hirerarchy of living species, we are without any potent natural enemy capable of keeping us busy trying to save our existence, something our ancestors had struggled to acheive through trials and tribulations and like most things & actions in the universe even that success of eliminating all natural enemies have probably started to boomerang.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
A small correction: Ararat is FAR more important to the Armenian people than is acheived through the Noah's Arc story. Thousands of years before Christ, the Armenian people were "Urartian" - people of the land of "Urartu." Urartu meant "the land that's kind of around Ararat." It's been the focal point of Armenian civilazation since 3000 BC.
even communist were more prepared for this with a new and hot cult of lenin and his followers were just killing each other until the one, who was ready to unite an empire, has won
I've just spent the last three days watching all your videos. Your work it's just amazing and rare, it surely deserves all the appreciation it could possibly get, and definitely more views than what it has. I think that beyond hard work and an inspired mind, it takes a lot of courage to do what you guys are doing in here, please go on with it. I would gladly watch another thousand of these videos because, they are not only wonderful but, seeing them it's like touching different pieces of the human kind. Thank you very much.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
I know it didn't work in Flint, Michigan. but hang on, did you actually know the water content on Mars is compatible to human consumption as we have here on Earth? or did you assume that?
I love that answer, of course distillation will filter gamma radiation as well. I bet your were mind-blown when Matt Damon grew a potato crop in a Hollywood studio.
Maybe but the moon has a meagre atmosphere, protection from solar radiation, more sunlight and is significantly quicker to get to. It's small size means a couple of shattered ice comet bombardments and you get water, a greater atmosphere and faster rotation.
Yeah, especially since he acts like he reads minds. Instead of saying "obviously they don't want people to find out the ark doesn't exist" which, of course is not a bad view, but he forgot to mention the possibility of them wanting people to doubt the ark exists. I mean the mountain belongs to Muslims, do you really think they'd chance people finding proof of a Christian bible story?
I truly believe that dogma is a necessary mechanism of the human mind; we are unable to understand the universe, and our self-awareness is a bane we must deal with. It is our anomaly in which we are both cursed and blessed and dogma is our simple way to stay sane in the face of the immense beyond we will probably never understand.
It is a coping mechanism with things we don't understand. And those are always plenty not just due to things 'beyond our understanding' but also due to limited capacity and time. I simply can't be an expert at everything. We often assosciate dogmata with blind obedience but a belief in an authority figgure that can explain aspects of our lives we don't understand for us is an essential aspect of compartmentalizing life. Whether that's a minister, a monk, a scientist or a rich guy with a mission. We can't explore everything ourselves. So we need a mechanism to deal with the uncertainty taht creates :-)
FelKor that's a very interesting take on it. I think however dogma is implicitly somewhat blind, whereas experiencing things vicariously, like us all watching Rare Earth for example, does not necessarily imply tacite absorption of ideas. :)
In other words, we must willfully embrace insanity because we cannot handle sanity. I do think we are forever slaves to our irrational bodies, who dictate us to act in these loony ways. Because with reason alone we would cease to act. The truly rational human being is a dead one.
pixlplague Well I don't hold Evan as an authority on a field I don't understand. But I get your point. Tiny thought elaboration only if you're interested: I think the difference isn't a s big as you'd think though. What's different is what it takes to convince you of someones authority on answering a question you can't. For some claiming a man hears devine voices is enough for others they need to know the expert dedicated his life to the subject. Yes the foundation of what priests or scientists use to answer a question like 'how was the world created' is very different and their 'expertise' needs to convince you. But once you are convinced of their expertise the difference isn't that big. I don't douvle check if my priest really talks to god but neither do I do my own carbon dating to check the scientists claim. I do trust that my experts knows what he's talking about. Naurally I exaggerated this a little but I think when we condemn dogma (or what's behind it) as 'for stupid/weak people' we fail to udnerstand the purpose it serves. Should we blindly believe explanations? ABSOLUTELY NOT. But we do need to believe something. Sorry for the tiny rant ;-)
It's similar to saying "While the crusaders were Christian, Christianity isn't the crusades." Or Jihad and Islam. I think it's generally understood. But Evan was using Stalinism as a snapshot of a greater reality of atheism in general - while Christianity has its relics, the people who created those relics aren't Christianity - but atheists generally do heavily subscribe to the myths of progress, you need look no further than science fiction. For the record, I am not a theist and have never been religious, so I am not trying to bash atheism for the benefit of religion or anything like that.
Seekarr The thing is that There is no Myth of progress; comparing what science fiction depicts sa the future to what actually comes out in `20 years is laughable for a couple of reasons. First off, it's FICTION, not meant to be factual or realistic. Second, the items depicted in science fiction often end up inspiring people in the future to create that very product. On to the main topic; We are living in an age of all time human excellence. Crime, death, rape, war, poverty, disease, famine, and slavery are at all time lows. We have a fantastic understanding of the human body to the point where the average lifespan is double that of our fore-bearers not 3 generations ago. General education is at an all time high, and the world is working towards leaving the planet to settle and spread ourselves out. Humanity is doing great, contrary to the news' depiction of the modern world. We make progress towards a more prosperous future every day. Just because you don't personally get a physical present every day doesn't mean that we aren't making progress. We are in an age where we are straining to shake the shackles of the Gods, and we are reaching for the stars to become Gods ourselves. As Kubrick once said "However vast the darkness, we must supply our own light".
_ Wayfinder _ You're talking about actual progress that has occurred - not myths of progress of what is to come, of which there are plenty. One example was the Stalinist myth described in this video. As for science fiction: there are plenty of people who believe that we're going to discover warp drives or hyperdrives and bring a reality to what's depicted in Star Trek. Plenty who believe "once we screw up this planet, we'll all 'exodus' and go to other planets."
As a Christian, as well as a Physics teacher, this is great. When i challenge someone on how sending humans to other planets is a waste of resources when it is more efficient to develop robots to do the job I see the same defiance and shakiness I see in fellow Christians when they lack an answer to a theological question.
I do believe humans have a value robots do not, especially in exploration terms. We should send "poets", so to speak. However, I don't believe that Mars will be the entirely self-sufficient planet civilization that is sold in the 'colonization in the case of a ruined earth'/'all eggs in one basket' ideology. It is 1598 so to speak, and that is proposing setting up a British colony on Antarctica, in case England was destroyed. Not going somewhere closer or easier to supply to test first. While the colony in Antarctica might someday develop the technology required to live there permanently, it would have been in everyone's best interest to try out a colony somewhere less harsh, let's say the Hebrides/Moon in this analogy, and work forward from there. In our generation and lifetimes, Mars can only ever be treated as a relic, promising the advancement of science well into the future. A relic in a forward direction. We, those who want that science fiction future plan - the star trek dreamers, the MarsOne hopefuls, etc., give that relic power. We once did it with the moon, but when we got there the power dissipated. Mars became a new standard of the human species. But it is a lie. A noble lie. Perhaps an accidental lie. But also a lie giving us a target to shoot for. I don't by definition dislike the lie, frankly speaking. Something has to fill the dogmatic void the death of religion has left behind. This is better than most. I think a future where science is given more due has much more merit than our current system. But it too will have its downsides, reliquaries, and preachers. The science fiction future isn't necessarily sold by Musk directly, but it is placed upon him and he runs the lie as anyone in his position has before him. A new Edison, selling Teslas.
Interesting video, I liked the points you made, and especially the part from 11:11 onnwards However I have to disagree with the point you made about elon musk at 8:50 and your comment above. There are many reasons for colonising mars rather than the moon, such as the presence of an atmosphere, a day/night cycle similar to that on earth and a gravitational field closer to that of earth. For further information: space.nss.org/the-case-for-colonizing-mars-by-robert-zubrin/ This thread brings up some good points: www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/2qbthq/why_is_everyone_so_eager_to_colonize_mars_while/ As well as article: qz.com/1105031/should-humans-colonize-mars-or-the-moon-a-scientific-investigation/ I would really appreciate a response, and hopefully this helps.
It would take alot more to engineer a drone that could replicate all that a human is capable of. A human is already a perfect engineer, is autonomous without the need for a wifi connection, Has a better battery life than a drone, repairs itself and can make discoveries based on intuition. And the only real prize to pay is a second rocket filled with food and water.
not only should we send robots everywhere, but we should make the robots Christians. what a glorious second revival we/they could have. robots are coming and ai is coming, there isn't an option to suppress it, china or UAE will develop it one day , we may as well embrace it and shape it.
Joel Reid at present robots are the better alternative because we don't have the level of technology it would require to keep someone in suspended animation for that length of time. The robot, by comparison, can refuel on the vessel's solar power and operate just often enough to stay in working condition, avoid hazards, and do maintenance on the ship. In fact we could make them better thinkers and improvisers than real people.
I'm not sure everyone knows they are lying. You bring up Musk as an example but I think it is just as likely that he belives his own lie as purposly lying.
I used to be a christian, and I lied to myself and others to support that faith. I wasn't consciously aware of my lies, for the most part. I think that plenty of those who lie in the support of an ideology are not fully aware of their lie.
FirewolfQuasar there's a difference with musk though. Mars is ultimately a scientific experiment, he's trying to achieve something. If it fails, it fails
FirewolfQuasar something interesting about us humans i observed is: it can be both. You can start with a conscious lie. But we are often very good at fooling even ourselves to believe our own lies because it reinforces how we see the world
Yeah, I agree with you, FirewolfQuasar. I absolutely loved this video, and the way he shone light on all of our lies. But when it comes to space exploration, that is literally a pragmatic way for us to not die with our planet. However, in order to get the greater masses to want to set foot on other planets, a dogma or a lie might be needed. That is what makes this topic so interesting, because we can clearly see the viability of the historical lies even today!
Rare Earth, as a devout Roman Catholic, I must admit this piece is very well done and I applaud your search for the Truth. Relics hold a very time honored tradition in the Christian faith; they are one of the oldest beliefs as our scripture dictates that a man was resurrected by the bones of the prophet Elijah. The idea of Relics themselves predate Christianity. Whether they exist only in the allegorical sense or are active representations of the miraculous which could be confined or unbound to any scientific context, they point out that resurrection is something that is innately held within the human psyche. That is, for as impermanent as mankind truly is, there must be hope that we can somehow transcend the bonds of our mortality. Jesus himself spoke both allegorically and authoritatively, not only was there clear symbolism but also physical determination. The spear in the side by which blood and water flowed is obviously the glaring truth of doubt among his disciples. It was the very mechanism by which Thomas the Apostle doubted the Resurrection yet only a few days later, Thomas himself was running his hands through his own doubt finding there to be more truth in the life of Christ himself. As tradition dictates, Thomas traveled more than any other Apostle, he died in India stoned to death by people who had no context at all whether a spear or even Jesus himself had ever existed. I think your skepticism is appropriate especially in this era where dogma can no longer allow itself to be tied up in superstition. I hope your doubts lead you to more profound truths of the nature and context of God.
Relics are absolutely meaningless to Christians only to pagans that Catholics are, Christians don't care about relics nor titles like holy one or holy father or priest that is something you only find idolatry! Repent to God and turn your back to the Roman Catholic
@@tauvid9798 You WILL remember these words when you finally meet your Maker. Jesus said: love on another as I have loved you! Does that excuse your untruthfullness about the Church which Jesus Himself started? I will pray for you and your ilk to come to the TRUTH. Blessing from The Great South Land of The Holy Spirit.
Ok, so let's say the Ark did exist... That was maybe 6,000 years ago... And it was made of wood and used as a house, meaning exposure to the elements. All I'm saying that any actual boat that may have been written about as the Ark has probably long since rotted away into dirt. As a Christian though, this is ok. Because not only does the Lord say, "Ashes to ashes, dust to dust", wouldn't lusting over a bit of boat, no matter how holy, count as idolatry?
It's not necessarily lusting after something and worshipping it as to prove a Christian bible story, I'm sure if Christians found the ark they'd worship Jesus instead.
limpthemememan, there have been massive floods all over the world at various points in time, inspiring flood stories in many religions. There is no evidence for a global flood.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
@@oliphanti06bailey90 but when the Whole World tried to kill him and again, he held onto it and avoided like 40 known attempts. He should have died in Wolf Lair Bomb. Popped eardrum and guy next to him quite dead. My money is if any have mystical powers, it's that one.
Brian Freeman after much contemplation I still wonder was his interest occultish in seeking that power or did he deep down have a desire to be closer to the human Jesus of nazareth and own the final weapon of his death, thereby, making himself king of Kings, and conquerer of all man. Within all of his madness their was some rhyme to his reason. Only compatible fiqure would ghengis Khan and his belief of himself being god king. Terrible analogy
The mind can supersede rationale. While having it, did he feel like it was a lucky rabbits foot. Or was something that could ward off evil doers towards him. Like you say 40 some times ? Why did he survive all that and still have more people killed. Many atheists would point this out ? Why ? Free will is my only conclusion
Evan, I would be very interested in your (and perhaps your father's) take on the viability of Moon colonization vs Mars - my understanding is that while they both have the presence of water, the moon's inability to hold an atmosphere and the resulting massive temperature swings would make it a worse candidate for a sustainable manned colony. Yes, it'd be closer to service from the Earth, but the trip is still days at a minimum, so emergency travel would still be relatively long and involved. The primary cost barrier to travel within the solar system is escaping the Earth's gravity well, so once you're out far enough, t's not that much more to go to Mars than the Moon. Very interested in your response, hope you see this!
I also believe much more in cislunar space, but first and foremost as a place for industry, not as a place where humans would choose to live if it wasn't for their job. The moon seems like a terrible place for colonization for many reasons. For one we really don't know much about the quantities of water on it. We don't even know for sure yet if we can easily use it to fuel rockets (although that seems likely), sustaining an entire human colony might simply be impossible. And not just water, many lighter elements probably don't exist in sufficient quantities on the moon either. Big ones being carbon and nitrogen. We kind of need those. An industry outpost akin to stations in the antarctic or offshore oil rigs would be fine with having the essentials shipped to it, but there's really no reason to set up shop there voluntarily. The long lunar night is hugely inconvenient for many reasons one of which you already mentioned. Others are solar power and added difficulty in growing crops. Artificially lighting plants requires energy that's going to be hard to come by in total darkness unless someone cracks fusion and most plants don't like hibernating for weeks on end in total darkness. That could probably be worked around in various ways, but it's certainly a challenge and challenges mean higher cost. There is already doubt if the 38% gravity on Mars are sufficient for upkeep of human health, but the Moon's gravity almost certainly isn't. And then there's the issue of lunar dust. Mars has wind which makes the dust particles rounder and less abrasive, Moon dust you really want to avoid. Yeah, the moon is going to be an invaluable asset if we ever become a space faring species, but it's garbage for colonization. You'd be better off building space stations in LEO space if you already have to import everything.
There's no point to colonize any planet or moon. A manned base or city on Mars would be self sufficient, so if that's the case why bother to fixate it on a rock? Just put the base/city in space and now you can also move it around. Gravity wells are also a pain in the butt to get out of. The Soviets were trying this with the MIR space-station program, while the Americans were wasting money on landing men on a useless rock to do .. what? The exact things that those men did on the Moon, the Soviets also did with robots. It's because the USA won the Cold War that they could accentuate their victories in the Space Race while diminishing those of the USSR. The victor writing history also meant writing our culture. And now most people are left with an irrational view of space colonization: that big rocks, just like our own, have some intrinsic value, while ignoring the primary advantage of space travel - limitless freedom.
A space station that isn't in the near vicinity of some large rock will never be self sufficient. You need raw materials, likely to be mined from asteroids or maybe even distant moons like Titan. So until we've got regular and cheap asteroid mining and extremely large scale on orbit construction going on, Mars is the better choice for colonization.
In the end these three options all have valid arguments to them, each having their own advantages and their own disadvantages. Right now it's kind of hard to really say for sure which one is better, many people have various opinions on why one is better then the other in their opinion... But well, in the end one could say we haven't really tested it out. It's hard to take in to account every factor after all and choosing the best option. Still one thing is clear for all of them, before we can even really leave the start line travel to space must be made far cheaper. So in that respect this second space age will help, and with it our abilities to explore the solar system will expand and help determine which if any of those options were right. Perhaps they all are, perhaps we'll end up just doing all three. Or perhaps we'll do none of them for some reason or the other. I think it will be interesting to see which way it will go.
One main problem is that Mars is a year away or at best six months away with current technology. A lot can happen in a year, and you can get a lot of opportunities for radiation exposure in a year. Mars has the disadvantages of an atmosphere and few of the advantages of one, you still have to use a heat shield but parachutes alone won't land you. Mars is in a large gravity well, whereas the Earth-Moon libration points are on the superhighways of space and it would take very little energy to get resources to and from the asteroids and the Moon. A space colony at L4 or something isn't as sexy as bootprints on Mars though, which is why NASA and others will continue to pursue the less viable option (Mars) instead of the more viable option (space colony at a libration point and a robotic resource transportation system to get stuff there from the Moon and the asteroids.)
Amazing as always. For me the fact that your videos aren't about places,objects or even history but about the people behind these things is what makes rare earth one of a kind for me. Thank you
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
I read a great statement by a guy who wrote about the power of myth in a biblical archeology magazine I subscribe to: "Just because it never happened doesn't mean it isn't true."
Atheist archaeologists say the opposite: "Just because we dug it up and found exactly what the Bible says, doesn't mean it happened." For reference see Jericho, or Patterns of Evidence: Exodus.
As an atheist myself I think there is a middle-ground, I am sure some guy like Jesus existed and I am sure that people liked him maybe followed him and the ideas he put forward, I and I am sure he was later killed by the romans, but I am also sure the story has been changed over thousands of years, dramatized and warped.
@@john.d.rockefeller2538, unfortunately it couldn't have "changed over the thousands of years," simply because the exact same scriptures handed down over those "thousands of years" and all trace fragments are exactly the same as all the writings found in Qumeran in the 60's. If you were handed a death sentence for changing anything while employed to hand copy text, would you do it? Lastly when written prophecy "thousands of years" comes true to every word, how does an inept atheist deal with that? The book of Daniel is an example.
...After I spend my day watching all sorts of alienated videogame, tv series topics, UA-cam drama, and top tens videos in UA-cam, in a black hole of procrastination, in wish I understand I am loosing my life, every time I watch your videos I feel like I am in an other world, and my brain is cleanead just a bit to give me a healthy curiosity for how we move as a society and what I can see in my own ways of what you talk about, in what I feel as a story that is not of a place but of all. Thanks for vacuum the slime I voluntary throw at my brain when I spend my time watching UA-cam videos and giving me something I feel is a meaningful commentary for life...I am going to patron one day, you are the only youtuber that makes me feel like I really own him that...ok, I’m going to do it now, xD. Again thanks for your content.
Doublethink- The acceptance of or mental capacity to accept contrary opinions or beliefs at the same time, especially as a result of political indoctrination.
Defined by Orwell in a a book inspired heavily by an aggressively atheist government. I guess living by the dogma while claiming to reject all dogma does fit the definition.
I have a degree in theology, and masters in counter terror, I spend a lot of time trying to find the words to explain stuff like this to people, both in debate and just at the pub. Super humbled to see it so well done here and in about a tenth of the time it takes me. This channel is great and I'm probably just going to start linking people these video which frankly are fantastic. Utterly amazing work!
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
Yeah, and it's a little weird it has a cross engraved in it despite being present at the actual crucifixion of Jesus :P not to mention it probably looks nothing like a Roman lance from that time. But as Evan said, sometimes there's more value in the symbol than in the object itself.
It's not even a lance really. It is too wide to be a useful spearhead, and there would have certainly not been a cross cut into a Roman spear at that time period. The cross wasn't a religious symbol yet, and the Romans weren't exactly preforming some ritualistic killing. To them it would have just been another dissident to put down; it had happened plenty of times before this.
Well, jesus wasnt a big deal for the romans back then. In their eyes he's been just another lunatic claiming to be a prophet. And his marvelous feats were bound to be exaggerated in one form or another. Him curing a blind person was probably wiping sand from the eyes of an elder or something like that. As Wayfinder said: It happened before. As time progressed people came to believe in his idea of charity. Another religion was born.
And that is why relics should only ever be seen as symbolic, and an aid to religious focus, in the way that a photo of someone makes you think about them. I'm Russian Orthodox, btw, but i retain the scepticism of the more Puritan parts of my early life. Good video, and it makes very valid points.
*If* we take the story of Noah's arc literally there is still no reason to believe that the arc would still exist in any respect. Also everyone would be a direct descendant of Noah.
I always imagine the 2 poor little penguins that had to waddle to the middle east to get on the boat, and what a stressful journey that must have been.
Maniax69 there is no reason to think that any trace of a wooden boat, built thousands of years ago and left derelict on top of a mountain, would still exist.
Beautiful. It is one of the things that you would think and talk about repeatedly, but then someone [you in this case] makes a half-an-hour videos laying it out. You are a god amongst men.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
I cannot put into words my deep reverence and appreciation for what you and your team are doing. Every single word is razor sharp, and cuts to the heart of the issue. The reflection time that your videos afford to me has a special place in my heart. Thank you.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
Every new video feeds into my dogma that this is the best channel on UA-cam. Hands down. Way to go, Evan! I love watching your videos and your narration style.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
I think you're absolutely right on dogmatism being inert rather than connected to any particular belief, biggest lesson of the twentieth century - the more idealised the beliefs, the bloodier the revolution
Dude, you are a great storyteller and I continually find myself listening intently to things I wasn't sure about when I started and I am never disappointed.Thank you and keep doing what you are doing!
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
Protestant here: relics fascinate me because A) Even if they are authentic (which they aren't), they shouldn't have any religious significance... I am confident theologically without having to rely on old pieces of wood in a cathedral somewhere and B) even though they are obviously fascimiles of the biblical objects they purport to be, many of these relics are neat historical pieces because although they aren't 2000 years old, they are hundreds of years old. Great video.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
This channel gets so unexpectedly deep sometimes but I have to agree with all of it. We are limited creatures with limited understandings and we try to fill in the pieces in ways that make us feel better religious or not.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
Another fascinating and thought provoking video! I was certainly prepared to be offended (being an atheist) what with the video's title, but it never happened. You have a wonderful way of speaking sir!
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
This might be your best video yet. Also, as a commie, I can't begin to express how refreshing it is for someone to actually understand the goals of communism, even if you consider them impossible. Keep up the amazing work!
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
Finally a video, a narrative, a commentary that seems to only want the truth even if it can’t be found or understood. This represents the “absolute” effort to find truth and be truthful. Thank you for an amazing video and to be willing to understand the shadows!
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
Wow ... the Elom Musk reference is interesting. The one comment I would like to add is that Musks work undeniably makes the world a better place (aspecially with Tesla, SpaceX too but is harder to see it). And not only in a 'feel better' manner, but actual technology. Wheras the liar about the spear did not fix global warming or starvation or any other real physical issue that might have been a problem then. Therefore, even though the comparison is interesting and thought provoking (which is great, and I appreciate it) it is not entirely fair. Great video, I am glad that you did not get scared for poking at the icon of 21st century :)
This is all complicated by the issues of fiction and futurism; we lie to understand as much as to motivate; and plans are also lies. Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to believe... or perceive, for that matter. Thanks again, another thought-provoking essay.
Only in the sense that we're describing a state of affairs that doesn't exist; it's a fabrication, and the more detailed, the more fabricated. This is especially true given that so many evaporate on contact with reality! But in no way am I claiming are they intended as deceit, nor even really 'fooling ourselves' (for the most part), just the same kind of invention that goes with lies, and fiction. My comment is just about how these things all involve invention and belief, and it's interesting territory.
Lost me a bit on the Musk part (don't consider myself a fanboy either for what it's worth). Musk wanting to go to Mars has less to do about the advancement of humanity, and more to do with being a backup for humanity (he's said as much in numerous interviews anyway). Mars is a reasonable conclusion to be the best place to setup a long term backup society as well given its resources, proximity and more (in comparison) favourable conditions for supporting human life.
In 1896, if someone pitched setting up a colony on Antarctica as a possible backup for Europe, I'd argue the same thing. We need a better reason. Humanity got bored with the moon in fewer than 3 missions. Mars isn't anything like it is being sold as, and while I'd love to be proven wrong on that, I don't expect I will be. It isn't the story they're selling. But it is a story of progress. We all use relics to feel we understand (and potentially even control) the world.
You keep using this Antarctica example, but you're fundamentally wrong. we have the technology to survive on mars, we just have an issue getting there. It has more than just a failsafe for us to lust for; resources, research, historical data, and most importantly it has water. The moon is neat, but ultimately useless. A mag-lev space elevator system would be much better, if it were currently viable.
Humans have never needed much of a reason for anything. "It's cool", "I don't like it here" or even just a "why not" are all valid reasons for many individuals that they're going to find themselves, for themselves. If people can do something, some inevitably will. All we have ever needed is the possibility, the economic feasibility. Coincidentally that's also what stopped the moon landings. "Boredom" is selling the entire Apollo program short. Economic feasibility is what will make or break Mars too and why Musk made it his number one goal. It may prove impossible in the end, but at least it's an actual light at the end of the tunnel and not just mere imagination, a lie of there of one. A backup for humanity on the Moon on the other hand might be such a lie as there's little chance of a Moon colony being self sufficient.
All cathedrals have a relic in them. My home church apparently has a few phalanges from saint peter (I'm not sure if they're from his fingers or toes).
I'm very unqualified to say any of this but I don't think it's evident that all of the three examples you gave were knowingly lying. Also, I must confess I'm a huge Musk fanboy, so I feel obligated to point out the following: - From a pure "Earth back-up" point of view, Mars is a lot safer than the Moon. If anything catastrophic should happen to earth there's a good chance it will also affect the moon. - Mars is a lot more interesting scientifically and from an adventure standpoint, with its potential to be terraformed, active magnetic field, massive amounts of H2O... But you are partially right about Mars being more of a tool than of actual use. Musk set out for Mars initially because he wanted to relight the space race. He thought a human landing or Mars greenhouse would reinvigorate the public's interest in space travel. His goal from the start was to increase NASA's budget. Whether he still feels this way, I don't know. A lot has changed. Great stuff Evan, you're the only channel on UA-cam that makes me do legitimate introspection, which is extremely valuable, keep it up!
Mars isn't any safer it cannot be terraformed there's not enough material on the planet and even if their was there is no consistency in the magnetic field solar wind would blow away any atmosphere and any life would be subjected to intense radiation
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
I'm Christian myself, but I know that I can never be certain that my faith is true, I can never eliminate doubt. I have my own arguments for why I am compelled to believe in certain religious ideas, but I'm open to changing my mind in the future. Having spent so much time fascinated with Christianity, its early history and the growth of its beliefs, I know that there really is no door shutting argument either way. When I see the completely certain I also get the sense they are lying, it feels so disingenuous. I'm happy to say I have trust there is a God and yet I can never know for certain if there is.
When you say "agnostic", are you using it as a term to try and deny you are atheist without being theist (an idea that by itself is false) or are you using it as a term to describe the debate with Socrates where it was indicated where one cannot truly know (until you get to Descartes). Atheism and Agnosticism are answering different questions, people who try to impose Agnoticism in place of Atheism don't often realize they aren't answering the same question. I, for example, am an Agnostic Atheist. The reason I am able to call myself such is because the two are not related. Atheism by itself is only opposed to Theism, you are one or the other. But this means you can be an Agnostic Theist, and yes, there are Agnostic Theists that exist.
Agnostic theists are way better and logical than dogmatic theists At least they realize that they need a dogma, a purpose unlike others who take every single word to be literally true
To be specific, (a)theism refers to the question of belief in the existence of one or more deities. (A)gnosticism refers to epistemology, knowledge and the ability to know. I find gnosticism on either side of the theistic question rather irrational, since neither side has any evidence. I lean even harder agnostic in that I doubt we'll even be able to know either way for sure. An important point here is that agnostic can apply to many more things than theism. For example, it's commonly used in programming terminology. It is often desirable for a piece of software to be _platform agnostic,_ meaning it will work the same no matter where it is run, and more importantly requires no information about where it is being run. It simply runs _without knowledge_ of its host system.
8:56 As much as I agree with everything you said in this video, including the „mars-plan“ of musk, this is not true. The moon is far from a good option for space colonization. It‘s a good first step, but definitly not comparable with an entire other planet. In terms of planets, venus is far more viable than any orher planet in this solar system. The existence of a magnetosphere alone is a big plus (something both moon and mars lack). And „We went to the moon and it gave us no purpose“... i wouldn‘t agree with that either. It incited dreams in quite a lot of people; people that are now working hard to carry humanity beyond this planet.
Venus is the best planet if you want a second earth, but it's also incredibly hard to colonize as you need to terraform the entire planet before you can even set foot on its surface. Or you could build flying cloud cities, but that kind of defeats the purpose of being on a planet in the first place a bit as you lose the direct vicinity to raw materials but gain the disadvantage of having to climb a gravity well if you want to leave. Although maybe robotic mining may be feasible, but those need to be some really sturdy and heat resistant robots. It's going to be expensive either way. The Moon also has various things going against it, Mars really is the only option if you want something you can start with *right now*. I'm sure Musk has lied about something, but this ain't it.
true. It's not like we need to choose one. In the end, we'll probably try colonising all three astronomical bodies and beyond (Europa and Enceladus anyone?). But yes, mars definitely is a good first step, as is the moon if we want to test some general things. but as you said, if we really want an earth 2.0 and we have the necessary resources, venus should be the way to go.
Chribit colonizing either Mars or venus won't help anyone in fact it would make those colonizers lives worse living in a underground bunker on mars or never setting foot on solid ground on venus neither option is good and neither benefits humanity But that's the point you dogmatically believe that it will and go after anyone who doesn't think the same way
Mate, most of us already live in an underground bunker, essentially. I don't really leave my home for any purpose other than entering another building.
Though I should add, Musk is not lying. He merely says that we need to be extra-planetary as a species to survive, considering our propensities. I'm sure he would agree that we should establish a Moon base, especially considering that the Moon probably has the requisite propellant locked up in its polar caps to fuel our ships to Mars. Your remarks are interesting food for thought, though.
The script for this video sounds like a bunch of freshmen Philosophy majors, stoned, sitting around a dorm room and working out the meaning of life, the universe, and everything.
Calla Antoinette - you're so cute when you're snarky! You kinda remind me of myself when I was in high school. So, I'm up for a mature conversation. Tell me which parts of this video spoke to you on an intellectual level. Which parts did *not* sound like stoner freshmen Philosophy majors.
“The answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, and Everything is...” “Yes?” “...is...” “Yes?!?” “...forty-two.” “Forty-two?” “I told you you wouldn’t like it.”
i believe in God but I don't follow any organised religion because, for me, they're too quick to spread hate, bigotry and intolerance - not really what any of their deities are supposed to want. So thank you for this thought provoking video; it's nice to see a balanced argument with a well thought out reasoning that you put across succinctly and to the point. Relics were, particularly in the UK, where we almost had coast to coast monasteries and selling their (of their time) souvenirs was big busness. Well, until Henry VIII passed the he Dissolution of the Monasteries from 1536 to around 1541 ( think) by which he disbanded not only monasteries, but also convents, priories and friaries all so he could get his hands on their huge wealth of lands, property and monies for his own purposes. Before he did so there were so many monasteries, etc that pilgrims had a HUGE choice of which to visit - so monks had to have something draw them to their own monastery, friary, etc. Local saints such as Saint Winifred's in Flintshire in Wales had either wells where the saint had supposedly rested and drunk or even (yuk) bathed in some instances and thereby imbued the waters with their miraculous properties. Others would find the 'bones' of a saint - I think there's enough skeletal pieces of St. Peter and John the Baptist all over the world to make at least three clones each of the original. But hey it got bums on seats and poor, sick, desperate and destitute pilgrims handing over their hard earned coins to their relevant monastery so they would be smiled up by their chosen saint and forgiven and allowed into heaven. Apparently the verse from the bible was lost on the monks and other holy personnel who had, supposedly, taken a vow of chastity and poverty. The verse is pretty damning for these monasteries when you think about it - (Matthew 19:24) "It would easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God (I'm pretty sure that's paraphrased though). Organised religion then and organised religion now is all just big business - if it wasn't then Vatican City wouldn't have to be an absolute monarchy to avoid paying taxes, etc and declaring how much cash they really have.....
I have often wondered why people think everything having to do with Jesus was ornate and fitting for a king. He was a poor peasant. The Roman guards didn’t care about him. To them the crucifixion was just a couple more people who were sentenced to death. They didn’t go digging through the armory to find a spear with an ornate head. They would have had their normal issued spear that was part of their everyday kit.
@@silence8714 So I probably should have said "strict" or perhaps "hard" non-believers than. Or maybe it means agnostics are a good influence on each other too?
Going to another planet is important for the survival of humanity though, and the moon has more downsides than mars (little if any water, way too little gravity, way higher temperature variance). I guess Musk may have different personal reasons to do it, but it's still far from a baseless endeavour.
I think if we stop fighting ideological wars and stem population growth alongwith mind boggling levels of pollution, we can very well survive on this Earth as well. I don't deplore scientific research and innovation, it's absolutely important. But, living in harmony with nature, i.e., a sustainable life is just as important.
@@sanujgoyal622 Well, yes. We can and should do all that is in our power to take care of our environment in Earth. The problem is, even if we did achieve a "perfect" existence here on Earth (dismissing the politics of how to do it and the philosophy of what it means), we would still be at risk of being wiped out. Several different cosmic-scale phenomena could completely destroy our civilisation. Going to a different celestial body and having colonies there would give us a better chance at surviving different cosmic scale events. Ultimately, we would only be "safe" by having a stable human colony outside of the solar system. Going to Mars and the Moon are just steps in that direction.
This is one of the best videos i have wached on youtube in a long time. Your analasys is so much on the mark that you don't need to be comleatly correct, that is not the point. The idea you put forth is the point. As a strong beliver in christianety, this was a good video to wach. Not because it disproved anything, but because it comfirmed my suspision about the reasoning behind it all. Anyway, great editing, filming and preformence as always. one of my favorite videos made so far. Keep up the good work!!
A message to all atheists from an atheist If you ever find yourself feeling Superior to those who have a religion, then your doing it wrong and need to check yourself. If you think religion cause of ignorance then you yourself are being ignorant. If they decide to become religious them that's their decision and calling someone ignorant will only harden their beliefs
Commander Cody Funny, because I opened up to the idea of atheism specifically because I watched videos calling me ignorant for my beliefs. Those taunts challenged me to learn the arguments for myself in order to refute them, only to discover that, to the best of my knowledge, they were right and I was wrong. Irreverence is the best medicine to cure someone of faith.
Certain systems of belief and cultural practices are better cultivators of ignorance and lazy thinking. If you teach your kid to question nothing and punish them if they do, they will clearly be a more ignorant person than someone who is perpetually encouraged to question and think about the world. Its a romantic Idea to think that religous and non-religous people will have the same level of ignorance, but I just don't think that's the case. It should be noted however that non-religous people can be extremely ignorant. If people are told not to believe in a god and mindlessly going along with it, it is going to be just as effective for cultivating ignorance as telling someone to believe in a god purely on faith
@@hypock1 yes it's religion can cause that but more times than not it's other factors eg poverty causes ignorance far more times than not. Besides that would be denying a basic human right to force no religion. Forcing a religion or forcing no belief/worship causes greater social tension, in which that stifles progress. So I don't see your argument fits in irl about perhaps that's my ignorance
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
Armstrong recently said when he really got how significant his lie had been was when he was told by a Livestrong worker that they were so angry at him as they had felt / become complicit in his lie... great video, thanks. I thought the Arc had been found...
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
The one thing that pissed me off was the fact you called the Journeys to the moon useless. It wasn't about the destination but about the journey, this resulted in new technology and it motivated a generation of scientist. No one said that there was salvation on the moon, or an ark or piles of gold.
2:00 I love how this supposes that one of the 4 must be telling the truth instead of supposing the more plausible reality that they could all be lying.
The point of colonizing Mars is to ensure the survival of humanity in case something terrible happens to Earth. The Moon does not suit that purpose as it's too close. It's a difficult, long term goal but Elon Musk decided to get started on it. Luckily he doesn't have a monopoly on space exploration, so anyone else is free to colonize the Moon in the mean time.
Mars won't work, it's gravity is to low they're just doing this for money and an audience. Many are turning away from Mars to making sky cities in Venus because of gravity. High enough from Venus's harsh pressurized surface, in the sky, gravity becomes very similar to earths. Now, when you're in space your bones deteriorate faster than someone with osteoporosis for the same reason a fish from the bottom of the ocean falls apart when brought to the surface. So why would Mars have a different effect, it'd just happen slower.
Colonizing Mars for the sake of money is the most cynical take on it yet. If a large asteroid hits Earth again (this has happened many times throughout history already, causing mass extinctions every time), we're all dead. Humanity is gone. Finished. Game over. We simply have to spread to other planets or there is no hope for our future.
Alexander we have cataloged the world ending asteroids and have most of the 1km sized asteroids cataloged and we have several plans for dealing with asteroids however there is no large asteroid in earths orbital path so there is little danger from asteroids at this point
While it's true that there aren't any enormous asteroids that we know of headed towards Earth right now, we most certainly do not have any means of solving that sort of problem. There are plenty of plans, I'm sure, but no real contingencies, let alone sufficient hardware. Regardless, asteroid impacts are not the one and only problem that humanity may face. They are merely the most instantly devastating. In any case, it remains true that colonizing another planet just for money is a preposterous insinuation.
I would argue that a religion does not require a god; It requires an unquestionable truth. What separates science from religion is not just the knowledge of what we don't know, but the desire to find out. Resigning ourselves to the idea that there are some things human kind may just never know is as harmful as saying it's just god's will. We advance by the pursuit of that knowledge that it just outside of our grasps. Will reaching Mars change us? Yes. Even if we are unable to colonize Mars, even if it doesn't contain water, useful material, or life, it moves the goalposts a little big farther. It extends the goal to the next thing we can strive for. We may not have been put on this planet with a purpose, but we have created one. And in trying to attain those goals, we find things that make our existences better.
God is an abstraction, like concept of tomorow - does it exist? Can you see it?. But acting if tomorow exists keeps us civil and we achieve great things. Remove not rational belief in tomorow and see what happens. No Mars for these people thats for sure.
Also the defining feature of delusion or dogma is that it's resistant or immune to evidence/experience. Your comparisons are flawed in that respect. It reminds me of a similar equivocation of 'everyone has an ideology' or 'everyone has faith in something' - well, no, you're just not identifying what makes an ideology an ideology, or faith faith, under those usages of the terms. I mean you're free to use words however you see fit, but the content is kind of important, and if you're using it in a way that does not reflect how everyone else uses it, that's either a mistake or disingenuous - in this case I think it's just a very common mistake people make... because people are terrriiible at thinking.
I, for one, am spellbound by this video. Coming from a family that has never engaged in religion, I found this video very thought-provoking. The thing I admire most about your videos is that even when I disagree with the statement, I always think about it first. There is something comforting to these videos. And I believe that they’ve grown better over time- the beginnings were also beautiful, but the eloquence and softness of the words gets better every time. You say what needs to be said. I give my respects
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case. The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one" Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation. The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
These videos exist because of you. Thank you.
patreon.com/rareearth
As much as it pains me to defend religion, 3 people in this situation didn't _necessarily_ lie. They could honestly (but incorrectly) _believe_ they are telling the truth, based on what they can find out.
Educational to the 2nd degree thanks!
At worst you can say that somebody, in the past, knowingly lied in three of those cases. But I suppose they could be genuinely confused, or mentally ill also.
Reading the descriptions for your Patreon tiers was hilarious. If only I wasn't a broke college kid 😂
I had to put my response on video. Nevermind tl:dr, this might be tl:dw but please have a look and hit that like button? I think I had some really interesting thoughts. ua-cam.com/video/qWhsuy6IC6I/v-deo.html This one's for you, Evan.
Crusader : "...if your master helps us, he can participate in our quest for the spear of destiny..."
Armenian soldier : "Okay I'll tell him, but I don't think he'll be interested, he's already got one you see..."
Benoit Bvg i told them we’ve already got one!
made my day
Crusader: Are you sure he's already got one?
Pecu Alex its a monty python reference
African or European swallow?
I’m reminded of a Mark Twain quote: The two most important days of your life are when you are born and when you figure out why. I do believe Evan has found his Why.
That is probably what we would like to believe.
In reality he is probably still looking for the answer and probably he will continue to do so.
Buddhists & historians say when Buddha attained enligthenment after the gruelling contemplation, he was asked by his disciples - what truth he had found. But he did not give any specific answer, and nowadays I am more inclined to believe that he did not have any specific answer.
Sometimes I feel that our lives are just spent looking for answers and while we can spend fruitless hours trying to find those we can also decide to just ignore those recurring questions and carry on with our daily works, still there is no denying that those questions keep on returning and people needs to find answers to those because neither we are sure they are answerable nor we are convinced they are not.
This situation has risen probably because human beings are at present at the top of hirerarchy of living species, we are without any potent natural enemy capable of keeping us busy trying to save our existence, something our ancestors had struggled to acheive through trials and tribulations and like most things & actions in the universe even that success of eliminating all natural enemies have probably started to boomerang.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
A small correction: Ararat is FAR more important to the Armenian people than is acheived through the Noah's Arc story. Thousands of years before Christ, the Armenian people were "Urartian" - people of the land of "Urartu." Urartu meant "the land that's kind of around Ararat." It's been the focal point of Armenian civilazation since 3000 BC.
and now we (turkey) named it "ağrı dağı" which literally translates to "pain mountain" lolz
That’s genuinely interesting
yeah ararat is where our civilization began way way way before christ lmao
I hope it really is a pain for ur people
@@yagzozandibek5196 and Turkey took it and made their own..
"The Spear that Pierced a Living God" sounds like either an emo band or song or an scp
Hello fellow SCP reader.
Then you might know "The Spear of the Non-Believer", the one used in The Way It Ends.
More a Death Metal song you could really trash to.
@@harrybetteridge7532 sounds like it could be a song by Nile
When stressed will shit out a bible
the Emperor removed religion and established his ideal empire, only to immediately be treated as a god upon his death
Good thing he got his Text-to-Speech device so he could set things straight.
And That's how the news goes.. remove religion n be worshipped as a god... good ideal utopian plan... ( did he not see it coming?)
even communist were more prepared for this with a new and hot cult of lenin
and his followers were just killing each other until the one, who was ready to unite an empire, has won
He became the very thing he swore to destroy
How Assassins Creed should have ended.
The title made the Evangelion theme start going off in my head.
"Sire! The holy spear of Antioch!
"1... 2... 5!"
"3 sir."
(I told him we already had one!)
thats handgrnade
@@mikeseymour1792 aren't you a sharp one
flyspeckcafe THEY wanted to see it? Go away you silly English Kaaniggit or I will Taunt you another time (some such nonsense!) love Monty Python
I've just spent the last three days watching all your videos. Your work it's just amazing and rare, it surely deserves all the appreciation it could possibly get, and definitely more views than what it has. I think that beyond hard work and an inspired mind, it takes a lot of courage to do what you guys are doing in here, please go on with it. I would gladly watch another thousand of these videos because, they are not only wonderful but, seeing them it's like touching different pieces of the human kind. Thank you very much.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
LMAO they really made Evangelion real
@Kitanai Koneko thanks sherlock
I thought it was the Spear of Longiness, the Roman soldier.
@@spencerian The one who stabbed Jesus in the rib?
@Kitanai Koneko no shit
The hell?
2:41 everyone is supposed to be a direct descendant of Noah.
This is deeply offensive. I thought you would have some common human decency, but I guess not. How dare you criticize our lord and saviour Elon Musk.
Well done sir. :)
All hail our overlord and one true God!
It’s only deeply offensive if your faith in nothing is questionable.
Chris Reiser I have faith in nothing, it is the only thing that never let me down
TheParkourFencer And he’s the son of an astronaut.
That thing about Elon Musk, I really wasn't prepared for that. It hit real hard.
Wow.
Makes ya think
You can't even drink water from Flint, Michigan what makes you think you can drink from Mars?
I know it didn't work in Flint, Michigan.
but hang on, did you actually know the water content on Mars is compatible to human consumption as we have here on Earth? or did you assume that?
Distillation
I love that answer, of course distillation will filter gamma radiation as well.
I bet your were mind-blown when Matt Damon grew a potato crop in a Hollywood studio.
Maybe but the moon has a meagre atmosphere, protection from solar radiation, more sunlight and is significantly quicker to get to. It's small size means a couple of shattered ice comet bombardments and you get water, a greater atmosphere and faster rotation.
Lol, you just pissed of believers, Atheists and fans of Elon Musk together in 12 minutes xD Goodluck my friend
Bandame Lyndem Equality.
Also Communists
Yeah, especially since he acts like he reads minds. Instead of saying "obviously they don't want people to find out the ark doesn't exist" which, of course is not a bad view, but he forgot to mention the possibility of them wanting people to doubt the ark exists. I mean the mountain belongs to Muslims, do you really think they'd chance people finding proof of a Christian bible story?
It belongs to Muslims now, when it used to be part of Armenia, they didn't let anyone climb it
Troll level over 9000
I truly believe that dogma is a necessary mechanism of the human mind; we are unable to understand the universe, and our self-awareness is a bane we must deal with. It is our anomaly in which we are both cursed and blessed and dogma is our simple way to stay sane in the face of the immense beyond we will probably never understand.
It is a coping mechanism with things we don't understand. And those are always plenty not just due to things 'beyond our understanding' but also due to limited capacity and time. I simply can't be an expert at everything. We often assosciate dogmata with blind obedience but a belief in an authority figgure that can explain aspects of our lives we don't understand for us is an essential aspect of compartmentalizing life. Whether that's a minister, a monk, a scientist or a rich guy with a mission. We can't explore everything ourselves. So we need a mechanism to deal with the uncertainty taht creates :-)
FelKor that's a very interesting take on it. I think however dogma is implicitly somewhat blind, whereas experiencing things vicariously, like us all watching Rare Earth for example, does not necessarily imply tacite absorption of ideas. :)
pixlplague bahaha
In other words, we must willfully embrace insanity because we cannot handle sanity. I do think we are forever slaves to our irrational bodies, who dictate us to act in these loony ways. Because with reason alone we would cease to act. The truly rational human being is a dead one.
pixlplague Well I don't hold Evan as an authority on a field I don't understand. But I get your point. Tiny thought elaboration only if you're interested:
I think the difference isn't a s big as you'd think though. What's different is what it takes to convince you of someones authority on answering a question you can't. For some claiming a man hears devine voices is enough for others they need to know the expert dedicated his life to the subject. Yes the foundation of what priests or scientists use to answer a question like 'how was the world created' is very different and their 'expertise' needs to convince you. But once you are convinced of their expertise the difference isn't that big. I don't douvle check if my priest really talks to god but neither do I do my own carbon dating to check the scientists claim. I do trust that my experts knows what he's talking about.
Naurally I exaggerated this a little but I think when we condemn dogma (or what's behind it) as 'for stupid/weak people' we fail to udnerstand the purpose it serves. Should we blindly believe explanations? ABSOLUTELY NOT. But we do need to believe something. Sorry for the tiny rant ;-)
I agree with your points, but I have to say that, while stalinism was atheistic, atheism isn't stalinism.
I love your point. Thank you :)
+
It's similar to saying "While the crusaders were Christian, Christianity isn't the crusades." Or Jihad and Islam. I think it's generally understood. But Evan was using Stalinism as a snapshot of a greater reality of atheism in general - while Christianity has its relics, the people who created those relics aren't Christianity - but atheists generally do heavily subscribe to the myths of progress, you need look no further than science fiction.
For the record, I am not a theist and have never been religious, so I am not trying to bash atheism for the benefit of religion or anything like that.
Seekarr
The thing is that There is no Myth of progress; comparing what science fiction depicts sa the future to what actually comes out in `20 years is laughable for a couple of reasons. First off, it's FICTION, not meant to be factual or realistic. Second, the items depicted in science fiction often end up inspiring people in the future to create that very product.
On to the main topic; We are living in an age of all time human excellence. Crime, death, rape, war, poverty, disease, famine, and slavery are at all time lows. We have a fantastic understanding of the human body to the point where the average lifespan is double that of our fore-bearers not 3 generations ago. General education is at an all time high, and the world is working towards leaving the planet to settle and spread ourselves out.
Humanity is doing great, contrary to the news' depiction of the modern world. We make progress towards a more prosperous future every day. Just because you don't personally get a physical present every day doesn't mean that we aren't making progress.
We are in an age where we are straining to shake the shackles of the Gods, and we are reaching for the stars to become Gods ourselves.
As Kubrick once said "However vast the darkness, we must supply our own light".
_ Wayfinder _ You're talking about actual progress that has occurred - not myths of progress of what is to come, of which there are plenty. One example was the Stalinist myth described in this video. As for science fiction: there are plenty of people who believe that we're going to discover warp drives or hyperdrives and bring a reality to what's depicted in Star Trek. Plenty who believe "once we screw up this planet, we'll all 'exodus' and go to other planets."
As a Christian, as well as a Physics teacher, this is great.
When i challenge someone on how sending humans to other planets is a waste of resources when it is more efficient to develop robots to do the job I see the same defiance and shakiness I see in fellow Christians when they lack an answer to a theological question.
I do believe humans have a value robots do not, especially in exploration terms. We should send "poets", so to speak.
However, I don't believe that Mars will be the entirely self-sufficient planet civilization that is sold in the 'colonization in the case of a ruined earth'/'all eggs in one basket' ideology. It is 1598 so to speak, and that is proposing setting up a British colony on Antarctica, in case England was destroyed. Not going somewhere closer or easier to supply to test first. While the colony in Antarctica might someday develop the technology required to live there permanently, it would have been in everyone's best interest to try out a colony somewhere less harsh, let's say the Hebrides/Moon in this analogy, and work forward from there. In our generation and lifetimes, Mars can only ever be treated as a relic, promising the advancement of science well into the future. A relic in a forward direction.
We, those who want that science fiction future plan - the star trek dreamers, the MarsOne hopefuls, etc., give that relic power. We once did it with the moon, but when we got there the power dissipated. Mars became a new standard of the human species. But it is a lie. A noble lie. Perhaps an accidental lie. But also a lie giving us a target to shoot for. I don't by definition dislike the lie, frankly speaking. Something has to fill the dogmatic void the death of religion has left behind. This is better than most. I think a future where science is given more due has much more merit than our current system. But it too will have its downsides, reliquaries, and preachers. The science fiction future isn't necessarily sold by Musk directly, but it is placed upon him and he runs the lie as anyone in his position has before him. A new Edison, selling Teslas.
Interesting video, I liked the points you made, and especially the part from 11:11 onnwards
However I have to disagree with the point you made about elon musk at 8:50 and your comment above.
There are many reasons for colonising mars rather than the moon, such as the presence of an atmosphere, a day/night cycle similar to that on earth and a gravitational field closer to that of earth.
For further information:
space.nss.org/the-case-for-colonizing-mars-by-robert-zubrin/
This thread brings up some good points:
www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/2qbthq/why_is_everyone_so_eager_to_colonize_mars_while/
As well as article:
qz.com/1105031/should-humans-colonize-mars-or-the-moon-a-scientific-investigation/
I would really appreciate a response, and hopefully this helps.
It would take alot more to engineer a drone that could replicate all that a human is capable of.
A human is already a perfect engineer, is autonomous without the need for a wifi connection, Has a better battery life than a drone, repairs itself and can make discoveries based on intuition.
And the only real prize to pay is a second rocket filled with food and water.
not only should we send robots everywhere, but we should make the robots Christians. what a glorious second revival we/they could have. robots are coming and ai is coming, there isn't an option to suppress it, china or UAE will develop it one day , we may as well embrace it and shape it.
Joel Reid at present robots are the better alternative because we don't have the level of technology it would require to keep someone in suspended animation for that length of time. The robot, by comparison, can refuel on the vessel's solar power and operate just often enough to stay in working condition, avoid hazards, and do maintenance on the ship. In fact we could make them better thinkers and improvisers than real people.
I'm not sure everyone knows they are lying. You bring up Musk as an example but I think it is just as likely that he belives his own lie as purposly lying.
It could be said that he's simply delusional. However, if successful, history would consider him otherwise.
I used to be a christian, and I lied to myself and others to support that faith. I wasn't consciously aware of my lies, for the most part. I think that plenty of those who lie in the support of an ideology are not fully aware of their lie.
FirewolfQuasar there's a difference with musk though. Mars is ultimately a scientific experiment, he's trying to achieve something. If it fails, it fails
FirewolfQuasar something interesting about us humans i observed is: it can be both. You can start with a conscious lie. But we are often very good at fooling even ourselves to believe our own lies because it reinforces how we see the world
Yeah, I agree with you, FirewolfQuasar. I absolutely loved this video, and the way he shone light on all of our lies. But when it comes to space exploration, that is literally a pragmatic way for us to not die with our planet. However, in order to get the greater masses to want to set foot on other planets, a dogma or a lie might be needed. That is what makes this topic so interesting, because we can clearly see the viability of the historical lies even today!
Rare Earth, as a devout Roman Catholic, I must admit this piece is very well done and I applaud your search for the Truth. Relics hold a very time honored tradition in the Christian faith; they are one of the oldest beliefs as our scripture dictates that a man was resurrected by the bones of the prophet Elijah. The idea of Relics themselves predate Christianity. Whether they exist only in the allegorical sense or are active representations of the miraculous which could be confined or unbound to any scientific context, they point out that resurrection is something that is innately held within the human psyche. That is, for as impermanent as mankind truly is, there must be hope that we can somehow transcend the bonds of our mortality.
Jesus himself spoke both allegorically and authoritatively, not only was there clear symbolism but also physical determination. The spear in the side by which blood and water flowed is obviously the glaring truth of doubt among his disciples. It was the very mechanism by which Thomas the Apostle doubted the Resurrection yet only a few days later, Thomas himself was running his hands through his own doubt finding there to be more truth in the life of Christ himself. As tradition dictates, Thomas traveled more than any other Apostle, he died in India stoned to death by people who had no context at all whether a spear or even Jesus himself had ever existed.
I think your skepticism is appropriate especially in this era where dogma can no longer allow itself to be tied up in superstition. I hope your doubts lead you to more profound truths of the nature and context of God.
Relics are absolutely meaningless to Christians only to pagans that Catholics are, Christians don't care about relics nor titles like holy one or holy father or priest that is something you only find idolatry! Repent to God and turn your back to the Roman Catholic
Amen, brother.
Justin, I was replying to you (not the other reply in this thread).
@@tauvid9798 the amount of hatred you protestants express only make Catholics less likely to convert
@@tauvid9798 You WILL remember these words when you finally meet your Maker. Jesus said: love on another as I have loved you! Does that excuse your untruthfullness about the Church which Jesus Himself started? I will pray for you and your ilk to come to the TRUTH. Blessing from The Great South Land of The Holy Spirit.
Ok, so let's say the Ark did exist... That was maybe 6,000 years ago... And it was made of wood and used as a house, meaning exposure to the elements. All I'm saying that any actual boat that may have been written about as the Ark has probably long since rotted away into dirt. As a Christian though, this is ok. Because not only does the Lord say, "Ashes to ashes, dust to dust", wouldn't lusting over a bit of boat, no matter how holy, count as idolatry?
It's not necessarily lusting after something and worshipping it as to prove a Christian bible story, I'm sure if Christians found the ark they'd worship Jesus instead.
limpthemememan, there have been massive floods all over the world at various points in time, inspiring flood stories in many religions. There is no evidence for a global flood.
True. I have an odd affinity for statistics. I don't know why.
Well, when your whole world is the 5 mile square around your hut, if that floods, then the whole world flooded.
@@michaelbianchi22 the thing is the bible is 100% false and plagiarized,,the bible was originally an astrology book but you glorify it aka sun worship
Reminds me of the time someone said that if you gathered all the fragments of the relic of the True Cross, you'd actually get around 26 crosses.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
Indeed, the most famous spear is one is in Vienna. The lance of Longinus. ;)
Marco C. I thought that got lobbed into space
Oh Evangelion
@@oliphanti06bailey90 but when the Whole World tried to kill him and again, he held onto it and avoided like 40 known attempts. He should have died in Wolf Lair Bomb. Popped eardrum and guy next to him quite dead. My money is if any have mystical powers, it's that one.
Brian Freeman after much contemplation I still wonder was his interest occultish in seeking that power or did he deep down have a desire to be closer to the human Jesus of nazareth and own the final weapon of his death, thereby, making himself king of Kings, and conquerer of all man. Within all of his madness their was some rhyme to his reason.
Only compatible fiqure would ghengis Khan and his belief of himself being god king. Terrible analogy
The mind can supersede rationale. While having it, did he feel like it was a lucky rabbits foot. Or was something that could ward off evil doers towards him. Like you say 40 some times ? Why did he survive all that and still have more people killed. Many atheists would point this out ? Why ? Free will is my only conclusion
I'm loving these Armenia videos
Evan, I would be very interested in your (and perhaps your father's) take on the viability of Moon colonization vs Mars - my understanding is that while they both have the presence of water, the moon's inability to hold an atmosphere and the resulting massive temperature swings would make it a worse candidate for a sustainable manned colony. Yes, it'd be closer to service from the Earth, but the trip is still days at a minimum, so emergency travel would still be relatively long and involved. The primary cost barrier to travel within the solar system is escaping the Earth's gravity well, so once you're out far enough, t's not that much more to go to Mars than the Moon.
Very interested in your response, hope you see this!
I also believe much more in cislunar space, but first and foremost as a place for industry, not as a place where humans would choose to live if it wasn't for their job. The moon seems like a terrible place for colonization for many reasons. For one we really don't know much about the quantities of water on it. We don't even know for sure yet if we can easily use it to fuel rockets (although that seems likely), sustaining an entire human colony might simply be impossible. And not just water, many lighter elements probably don't exist in sufficient quantities on the moon either. Big ones being carbon and nitrogen. We kind of need those. An industry outpost akin to stations in the antarctic or offshore oil rigs would be fine with having the essentials shipped to it, but there's really no reason to set up shop there voluntarily.
The long lunar night is hugely inconvenient for many reasons one of which you already mentioned. Others are solar power and added difficulty in growing crops. Artificially lighting plants requires energy that's going to be hard to come by in total darkness unless someone cracks fusion and most plants don't like hibernating for weeks on end in total darkness. That could probably be worked around in various ways, but it's certainly a challenge and challenges mean higher cost.
There is already doubt if the 38% gravity on Mars are sufficient for upkeep of human health, but the Moon's gravity almost certainly isn't. And then there's the issue of lunar dust. Mars has wind which makes the dust particles rounder and less abrasive, Moon dust you really want to avoid.
Yeah, the moon is going to be an invaluable asset if we ever become a space faring species, but it's garbage for colonization. You'd be better off building space stations in LEO space if you already have to import everything.
There's no point to colonize any planet or moon. A manned base or city on Mars would be self sufficient, so if that's the case why bother to fixate it on a rock? Just put the base/city in space and now you can also move it around. Gravity wells are also a pain in the butt to get out of.
The Soviets were trying this with the MIR space-station program, while the Americans were wasting money on landing men on a useless rock to do .. what? The exact things that those men did on the Moon, the Soviets also did with robots. It's because the USA won the Cold War that they could accentuate their victories in the Space Race while diminishing those of the USSR. The victor writing history also meant writing our culture. And now most people are left with an irrational view of space colonization: that big rocks, just like our own, have some intrinsic value, while ignoring the primary advantage of space travel - limitless freedom.
A space station that isn't in the near vicinity of some large rock will never be self sufficient. You need raw materials, likely to be mined from asteroids or maybe even distant moons like Titan. So until we've got regular and cheap asteroid mining and extremely large scale on orbit construction going on, Mars is the better choice for colonization.
In the end these three options all have valid arguments to them, each having their own advantages and their own disadvantages. Right now it's kind of hard to really say for sure which one is better, many people have various opinions on why one is better then the other in their opinion... But well, in the end one could say we haven't really tested it out. It's hard to take in to account every factor after all and choosing the best option.
Still one thing is clear for all of them, before we can even really leave the start line travel to space must be made far cheaper. So in that respect this second space age will help, and with it our abilities to explore the solar system will expand and help determine which if any of those options were right. Perhaps they all are, perhaps we'll end up just doing all three. Or perhaps we'll do none of them for some reason or the other.
I think it will be interesting to see which way it will go.
One main problem is that Mars is a year away or at best six months away with current technology. A lot can happen in a year, and you can get a lot of opportunities for radiation exposure in a year. Mars has the disadvantages of an atmosphere and few of the advantages of one, you still have to use a heat shield but parachutes alone won't land you. Mars is in a large gravity well, whereas the Earth-Moon libration points are on the superhighways of space and it would take very little energy to get resources to and from the asteroids and the Moon.
A space colony at L4 or something isn't as sexy as bootprints on Mars though, which is why NASA and others will continue to pursue the less viable option (Mars) instead of the more viable option (space colony at a libration point and a robotic resource transportation system to get stuff there from the Moon and the asteroids.)
"When you strip away a person's dogma, often what you're left with is a person yearning for dogma"
This series is a masterpiece
Silent Anarchy absolutely.
Amazing as always. For me the fact that your videos aren't about places,objects or even history but about the people behind these things is what makes rare earth one of a kind for me. Thank you
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
I read a great statement by a guy who wrote about the power of myth in a biblical archeology magazine I subscribe to: "Just because it never happened doesn't mean it isn't true."
Atheist archaeologists say the opposite: "Just because we dug it up and found exactly what the Bible says, doesn't mean it happened."
For reference see Jericho, or Patterns of Evidence: Exodus.
As an atheist myself I think there is a middle-ground, I am sure some guy like Jesus existed and I am sure that people liked him maybe followed him and the ideas he put forward, I and I am sure he was later killed by the romans, but I am also sure the story has been changed over thousands of years, dramatized and warped.
@@john.d.rockefeller2538,
unfortunately it couldn't have "changed over the thousands of years," simply because the exact same scriptures handed down over those "thousands of years" and all trace fragments are exactly the same as all the writings found in Qumeran in the 60's.
If you were handed a death sentence for changing anything while employed to hand copy text, would you do it?
Lastly when written prophecy "thousands of years" comes true to every word, how does an inept atheist deal with that?
The book of Daniel is an example.
4:15 "It'a a biblical yeti, a holy ghost" - one of mine new favorite quotes. You are legend, mate!
😂😂😂😂😂
...After I spend my day watching all sorts of alienated videogame, tv series topics, UA-cam drama, and top tens videos in UA-cam, in a black hole of procrastination, in wish I understand I am loosing my life, every time I watch your videos I feel like I am in an other world, and my brain is cleanead just a bit to give me a healthy curiosity for how we move as a society and what I can see in my own ways of what you talk about, in what I feel as a story that is not of a place but of all. Thanks for vacuum the slime I voluntary throw at my brain when I spend my time watching UA-cam videos and giving me something I feel is a meaningful commentary for life...I am going to patron one day, you are the only youtuber that makes me feel like I really own him that...ok, I’m going to do it now, xD. Again thanks for your content.
Doublethink- The acceptance of or mental capacity to accept contrary opinions or beliefs at the same time, especially as a result of political indoctrination.
Defined by Orwell in a a book inspired heavily by an aggressively atheist government. I guess living by the dogma while claiming to reject all dogma does fit the definition.
While being indoctrinated by family and country at birth and not being able to change or think for yourself is called being normal.
Try Confirmation Bias if you want to feel cynical about your fellow human.
I have a degree in theology, and masters in counter terror, I spend a lot of time trying to find the words to explain stuff like this to people, both in debate and just at the pub. Super humbled to see it so well done here and in about a tenth of the time it takes me. This channel is great and I'm probably just going to start linking people these video which frankly are fantastic. Utterly amazing work!
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
that doesn't look like a usefull lance
Yeah, and it's a little weird it has a cross engraved in it despite being present at the actual crucifixion of Jesus :P not to mention it probably looks nothing like a Roman lance from that time. But as Evan said, sometimes there's more value in the symbol than in the object itself.
It's not even a lance really. It is too wide to be a useful spearhead, and there would have certainly not been a cross cut into a Roman spear at that time period. The cross wasn't a religious symbol yet, and the Romans weren't exactly preforming some ritualistic killing. To them it would have just been another dissident to put down; it had happened plenty of times before this.
I dunno, maybe the soldier who owned it was really into crucifixions?
TheICEgirl6100 Because it was made to be a relic, not a weapon
Well, jesus wasnt a big deal for the romans back then. In their eyes he's been just another lunatic claiming to be a prophet.
And his marvelous feats were bound to be exaggerated in one form or another.
Him curing a blind person was probably wiping sand from the eyes of an elder or something like that.
As Wayfinder said: It happened before.
As time progressed people came to believe in his idea of charity. Another religion was born.
And that is why relics should only ever be seen as symbolic, and an aid to religious focus, in the way that a photo of someone makes you think about them.
I'm Russian Orthodox, btw, but i retain the scepticism of the more Puritan parts of my early life.
Good video, and it makes very valid points.
*If* we take the story of Noah's arc literally there is still no reason to believe that the arc would still exist in any respect. Also everyone would be a direct descendant of Noah.
I always imagine the 2 poor little penguins that had to waddle to the middle east to get on the boat, and what a stressful journey that must have been.
David Hunanyan There weren't just two of every animal in the original story. So that would be many penguins marching into the desert.
You contradict yourself. If we take the story literally and believe it, there's no reason to believe it?
Maniax69 there is no reason to think that any trace of a wooden boat, built thousands of years ago and left derelict on top of a mountain, would still exist.
David Hunanyan actually, the bible says there was to be seven of each bird. So there would be seven penguins.
Beautiful. It is one of the things that you would think and talk about repeatedly, but then someone [you in this case] makes a half-an-hour videos laying it out. You are a god amongst men.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
I cannot put into words my deep reverence and appreciation for what you and your team are doing. Every single word is razor sharp, and cuts to the heart of the issue.
The reflection time that your videos afford to me has a special place in my heart.
Thank you.
Danielle Spargo ok... odd choice of diction.
Bit over the top mate?? He's not a bloody god (yet.)
@@youraverageimperialguard7932 The vast majority of people on this planet do not speak English as their first language. Some leeway, please.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
Every new video feeds into my dogma that this is the best channel on UA-cam. Hands down. Way to go, Evan! I love watching your videos and your narration style.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
Underrated channel.
totaly
Why would it look so extravagant. I feel like the real one if it’s out there would be just as any other at the time
Barbara Bush living with Tupac would be worthy of Rare Earth coverage.
I think you're absolutely right on dogmatism being inert rather than connected to any particular belief, biggest lesson of the twentieth century - the more idealised the beliefs, the bloodier the revolution
Top 10 Elon musk roasts
And here I came for Leonidas's spear that he threw at a god king as his final act.
Dude, you are a great storyteller and I continually find myself listening intently to things I wasn't sure about when I started and I am never disappointed.Thank you and keep doing what you are doing!
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
It'd be much more impressive if he WASN'T a direct descendent of Noah.
Obviously he evolved from one of the monkeys stowed away on the ark
The last neanderthal king
Isn’t everyone typing in the comment sections direct descendants of noah
Protestant here: relics fascinate me because A) Even if they are authentic (which they aren't), they shouldn't have any religious significance... I am confident theologically without having to rely on old pieces of wood in a cathedral somewhere and B) even though they are obviously fascimiles of the biblical objects they purport to be, many of these relics are neat historical pieces because although they aren't 2000 years old, they are hundreds of years old. Great video.
wow, this was incredible, really good, way to go, sir
I absolutely love this channel. The professionalism that you guys show for every single episode is amazing. I love all your videos.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
This channel gets so unexpectedly deep sometimes but I have to agree with all of it. We are limited creatures with limited understandings and we try to fill in the pieces in ways that make us feel better religious or not.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
Amazing job, as always.
Dogma isn't necessarily a lie, its a constructed reality, but other than that I 100%agree
Another fascinating and thought provoking video! I was certainly prepared to be offended (being an atheist) what with the video's title, but it never happened. You have a wonderful way of speaking sir!
"A rocket may get us to Mars, but it won't change why we went."
No, it won't. You'd need nanobots for that.
This is impressive content. Great script, production values, it's not at all rushed. Great work.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
This might be your best video yet. Also, as a commie, I can't begin to express how refreshing it is for someone to actually understand the goals of communism, even if you consider them impossible. Keep up the amazing work!
im not sure why he confused atheism with communism. they are not even remotely related
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
Finally a video, a narrative, a commentary that seems to only want the truth even if it can’t be found or understood. This represents the “absolute” effort to find truth and be truthful.
Thank you for an amazing video and to be willing to understand the shadows!
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
oh WOW this is definitely one of the best video in all of your videos. You put it in such a nice way
Wow ... the Elom Musk reference is interesting. The one comment I would like to add is that Musks work undeniably makes the world a better place (aspecially with Tesla, SpaceX too but is harder to see it). And not only in a 'feel better' manner, but actual technology. Wheras the liar about the spear did not fix global warming or starvation or any other real physical issue that might have been a problem then. Therefore, even though the comparison is interesting and thought provoking (which is great, and I appreciate it) it is not entirely fair.
Great video, I am glad that you did not get scared for poking at the icon of 21st century :)
Really enjoying your channel's content.
This is all complicated by the issues of fiction and futurism; we lie to understand as much as to motivate; and plans are also lies.
Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to believe... or perceive, for that matter.
Thanks again, another thought-provoking essay.
Wm Reeves how are plans lies?
Only in the sense that we're describing a state of affairs that doesn't exist; it's a fabrication, and the more detailed, the more fabricated.
This is especially true given that so many evaporate on contact with reality!
But in no way am I claiming are they intended as deceit, nor even really 'fooling ourselves' (for the most part), just the same kind of invention that goes with lies, and fiction.
My comment is just about how these things all involve invention and belief, and it's interesting territory.
love all of the videos i have seen so far. this is a great series.
Lost me a bit on the Musk part (don't consider myself a fanboy either for what it's worth).
Musk wanting to go to Mars has less to do about the advancement of humanity, and more to do with being a backup for humanity (he's said as much in numerous interviews anyway). Mars is a reasonable conclusion to be the best place to setup a long term backup society as well given its resources, proximity and more (in comparison) favourable conditions for supporting human life.
In 1896, if someone pitched setting up a colony on Antarctica as a possible backup for Europe, I'd argue the same thing. We need a better reason. Humanity got bored with the moon in fewer than 3 missions. Mars isn't anything like it is being sold as, and while I'd love to be proven wrong on that, I don't expect I will be.
It isn't the story they're selling. But it is a story of progress. We all use relics to feel we understand (and potentially even control) the world.
You keep using this Antarctica example, but you're fundamentally wrong. we have the technology to survive on mars, we just have an issue getting there. It has more than just a failsafe for us to lust for; resources, research, historical data, and most importantly it has water. The moon is neat, but ultimately useless. A mag-lev space elevator system would be much better, if it were currently viable.
Humans have never needed much of a reason for anything. "It's cool", "I don't like it here" or even just a "why not" are all valid reasons for many individuals that they're going to find themselves, for themselves. If people can do something, some inevitably will.
All we have ever needed is the possibility, the economic feasibility. Coincidentally that's also what stopped the moon landings. "Boredom" is selling the entire Apollo program short. Economic feasibility is what will make or break Mars too and why Musk made it his number one goal. It may prove impossible in the end, but at least it's an actual light at the end of the tunnel and not just mere imagination, a lie of there of one. A backup for humanity on the Moon on the other hand might be such a lie as there's little chance of a Moon colony being self sufficient.
You need a better reason than ensuring that humanity can't be obliterated in a single disaster? Quite a demanding fellow you are.
Alexander
I figured it out; He doesn't want to lose the charm/viewership of his Earth-based channel with a Mars colonization.
All cathedrals have a relic in them. My home church apparently has a few phalanges from saint peter (I'm not sure if they're from his fingers or toes).
I'm very unqualified to say any of this but I don't think it's evident that all of the three examples you gave were knowingly lying.
Also, I must confess I'm a huge Musk fanboy, so I feel obligated to point out the following:
- From a pure "Earth back-up" point of view, Mars is a lot safer than the Moon. If anything catastrophic should happen to earth there's a good chance it will also affect the moon.
- Mars is a lot more interesting scientifically and from an adventure standpoint, with its potential to be terraformed, active magnetic field, massive amounts of H2O...
But you are partially right about Mars being more of a tool than of actual use. Musk set out for Mars initially because he wanted to relight the space race. He thought a human landing or Mars greenhouse would reinvigorate the public's interest in space travel. His goal from the start was to increase NASA's budget. Whether he still feels this way, I don't know. A lot has changed.
Great stuff Evan, you're the only channel on UA-cam that makes me do legitimate introspection, which is extremely valuable, keep it up!
Mars isn't any safer it cannot be terraformed there's not enough material on the planet and even if their was there is no consistency in the magnetic field solar wind would blow away any atmosphere and any life would be subjected to intense radiation
Deft, careful yet direct and sensitively handled video. Well done.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
Which giftshop can i buy one of these holy relics so i can sell my own giftshop holy relics
Rice Ali baba
I'm Christian myself, but I know that I can never be certain that my faith is true, I can never eliminate doubt. I have my own arguments for why I am compelled to believe in certain religious ideas, but I'm open to changing my mind in the future.
Having spent so much time fascinated with Christianity, its early history and the growth of its beliefs, I know that there really is no door shutting argument either way. When I see the completely certain I also get the sense they are lying, it feels so disingenuous. I'm happy to say I have trust there is a God and yet I can never know for certain if there is.
When you say "agnostic", are you using it as a term to try and deny you are atheist without being theist (an idea that by itself is false) or are you using it as a term to describe the debate with Socrates where it was indicated where one cannot truly know (until you get to Descartes).
Atheism and Agnosticism are answering different questions, people who try to impose Agnoticism in place of Atheism don't often realize they aren't answering the same question.
I, for example, am an Agnostic Atheist. The reason I am able to call myself such is because the two are not related. Atheism by itself is only opposed to Theism, you are one or the other. But this means you can be an Agnostic Theist, and yes, there are Agnostic Theists that exist.
Thank you Ocek, very cool.
Agnostic theists are way better and logical than dogmatic theists
At least they realize that they need a dogma, a purpose unlike others who take every single word to be literally true
To be specific, (a)theism refers to the question of belief in the existence of one or more deities. (A)gnosticism refers to epistemology, knowledge and the ability to know. I find gnosticism on either side of the theistic question rather irrational, since neither side has any evidence. I lean even harder agnostic in that I doubt we'll even be able to know either way for sure.
An important point here is that agnostic can apply to many more things than theism. For example, it's commonly used in programming terminology. It is often desirable for a piece of software to be _platform agnostic,_ meaning it will work the same no matter where it is run, and more importantly requires no information about where it is being run. It simply runs _without knowledge_ of its host system.
Your videos speak to me in a way that no other UA-cam videos do. First time I consider becoming a patreon.
"Michael Jackson is spotted alive in Bahrain"
-- some weird UA-cam comment I saw 2 years ago
This is by far the best video you have ever made
8:56
As much as I agree with everything you said in this video, including the „mars-plan“ of musk, this is not true. The moon is far from a good option for space colonization. It‘s a good first step, but definitly not comparable with an entire other planet.
In terms of planets, venus is far more viable than any orher planet in this solar system. The existence of a magnetosphere alone is a big plus (something both moon and mars lack).
And
„We went to the moon and it gave us no purpose“... i wouldn‘t agree with that either. It incited dreams in quite a lot of people; people that are now working hard to carry humanity beyond this planet.
Venus is the best planet if you want a second earth, but it's also incredibly hard to colonize as you need to terraform the entire planet before you can even set foot on its surface. Or you could build flying cloud cities, but that kind of defeats the purpose of being on a planet in the first place a bit as you lose the direct vicinity to raw materials but gain the disadvantage of having to climb a gravity well if you want to leave. Although maybe robotic mining may be feasible, but those need to be some really sturdy and heat resistant robots. It's going to be expensive either way.
The Moon also has various things going against it, Mars really is the only option if you want something you can start with *right now*. I'm sure Musk has lied about something, but this ain't it.
true. It's not like we need to choose one. In the end, we'll probably try colonising all three astronomical bodies and beyond (Europa and Enceladus anyone?). But yes, mars definitely is a good first step, as is the moon if we want to test some general things.
but as you said, if we really want an earth 2.0 and we have the necessary resources, venus should be the way to go.
Chribit colonizing either Mars or venus won't help anyone in fact it would make those colonizers lives worse living in a underground bunker on mars or never setting foot on solid ground on venus neither option is good and neither benefits humanity
But that's the point you dogmatically believe that it will and go after anyone who doesn't think the same way
Mate, most of us already live in an underground bunker, essentially. I don't really leave my home for any purpose other than entering another building.
KrKrp0n3 there's a difference between willingly doing it and doing it to survive
What the hell. How are you so good at this?? This channel is the G.O.A.T.
When I saw the title of this, I immediately thought: *Vivec.* I play Morrowind too much...!
So many things that should be shared; truly this earth should not be so rare. Thank you.
Though I should add, Musk is not lying. He merely says that we need to be extra-planetary as a species to survive, considering our propensities. I'm sure he would agree that we should establish a Moon base, especially considering that the Moon probably has the requisite propellant locked up in its polar caps to fuel our ships to Mars. Your remarks are interesting food for thought, though.
The script for this video sounds like a bunch of freshmen Philosophy majors, stoned, sitting around a dorm room and working out the meaning of life, the universe, and everything.
well, _most people are stupid_ tmyk 🌈✨
Calla Antoinette - you're so cute when you're snarky! You kinda remind me of myself when I was in high school. So, I'm up for a mature conversation. Tell me which parts of this video spoke to you on an intellectual level. Which parts did *not* sound like stoner freshmen Philosophy majors.
So what if it was written like dat?
“The answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, and Everything is...”
“Yes?”
“...is...”
“Yes?!?”
“...forty-two.”
“Forty-two?”
“I told you you wouldn’t like it.”
All the dumb asses are rollin in
“No matter how much light we shine in, we will always be looking at the shadows” damn straight. It’s called Phenomenalism, that’s my dogma.
I don't trust anyone who doesn't love dogma. Cats are ok, I guess.
My karma ran over your dogma. So sorry, mate!
We gee..I hate dogma, but follow magma..
I have a volcanic life.
ERNEST AEC-RADIO
Which to chose? Dogma or magma? It’s an enigma.
i believe in God but I don't follow any organised religion because, for me, they're too quick to spread hate, bigotry and intolerance - not really what any of their deities are supposed to want. So thank you for this thought provoking video; it's nice to see a balanced argument with a well thought out reasoning that you put across succinctly and to the point. Relics were, particularly in the UK, where we almost had coast to coast monasteries and selling their (of their time) souvenirs was big busness.
Well, until Henry VIII passed the he Dissolution of the Monasteries from 1536 to around 1541 ( think) by which he disbanded not only monasteries, but also convents, priories and friaries all so he could get his hands on their huge wealth of lands, property and monies for his own purposes. Before he did so there were so many monasteries, etc that pilgrims had a HUGE choice of which to visit - so monks had to have something draw them to their own monastery, friary, etc.
Local saints such as Saint Winifred's in Flintshire in Wales had either wells where the saint had supposedly rested and drunk or even (yuk) bathed in some instances and thereby imbued the waters with their miraculous properties. Others would find the 'bones' of a saint - I think there's enough skeletal pieces of St. Peter and John the Baptist all over the world to make at least three clones each of the original. But hey it got bums on seats and poor, sick, desperate and destitute pilgrims handing over their hard earned coins to their relevant monastery so they would be smiled up by their chosen saint and forgiven and allowed into heaven. Apparently the verse from the bible was lost on the monks and other holy personnel who had, supposedly, taken a vow of chastity and poverty. The verse is pretty damning for these monasteries when you think about it - (Matthew 19:24) "It would easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God (I'm pretty sure that's paraphrased though). Organised religion then and organised religion now is all just big business - if it wasn't then Vatican City wouldn't have to be an absolute monarchy to avoid paying taxes, etc and declaring how much cash they really have.....
Mars is way better than the moon. Mars has an atmosphere.
But like the Moon, not much of a gravity. That could wreck havoc on our bones.
7 millibars of fresh CO2
I have often wondered why people think everything having to do with Jesus was ornate and fitting for a king. He was a poor peasant. The Roman guards didn’t care about him. To them the crucifixion was just a couple more people who were sentenced to death. They didn’t go digging through the armory to find a spear with an ornate head. They would have had their normal issued spear that was part of their everyday kit.
"One of the direct descendants of Noah." According to the Bible that's ALL or ANY of us. Bunkum!
Agnostic folks are good influences for both non-believers and the faithful alike. It's good to have an open mind, even the things you're sure about.
The agnostics are non believers too just so you know it
@@silence8714 So I probably should have said "strict" or perhaps "hard" non-believers than. Or maybe it means agnostics are a good influence on each other too?
@@redpillow7221 I get your point. Open minded people can be an influence to close minded people, if their ever get out of their bubble.
Going to another planet is important for the survival of humanity though, and the moon has more downsides than mars (little if any water, way too little gravity, way higher temperature variance). I guess Musk may have different personal reasons to do it, but it's still far from a baseless endeavour.
I think if we stop fighting ideological wars and stem population growth alongwith mind boggling levels of pollution, we can very well survive on this Earth as well.
I don't deplore scientific research and innovation, it's absolutely important. But, living in harmony with nature, i.e., a sustainable life is just as important.
@@sanujgoyal622 Well, yes. We can and should do all that is in our power to take care of our environment in Earth.
The problem is, even if we did achieve a "perfect" existence here on Earth (dismissing the politics of how to do it and the philosophy of what it means), we would still be at risk of being wiped out. Several different cosmic-scale phenomena could completely destroy our civilisation.
Going to a different celestial body and having colonies there would give us a better chance at surviving different cosmic scale events. Ultimately, we would only be "safe" by having a stable human colony outside of the solar system. Going to Mars and the Moon are just steps in that direction.
This is one of the best videos i have wached on youtube in a long time. Your analasys is so much on the mark that you don't need to be comleatly correct, that is not the point. The idea you put forth is the point. As a strong beliver in christianety, this was a good video to wach. Not because it disproved anything, but because it comfirmed my suspision about the reasoning behind it all. Anyway, great editing, filming and preformence as always. one of my favorite videos made so far. Keep up the good work!!
A message to all atheists from an atheist
If you ever find yourself feeling Superior to those who have a religion, then your doing it wrong and need to check yourself.
If you think religion cause of ignorance then you yourself are being ignorant.
If they decide to become religious them that's their decision and calling someone ignorant will only harden their beliefs
Commander Cody I kept reading thinking you would back up your claims, but I was disappointed
Commander Cody Funny, because I opened up to the idea of atheism specifically because I watched videos calling me ignorant for my beliefs. Those taunts challenged me to learn the arguments for myself in order to refute them, only to discover that, to the best of my knowledge, they were right and I was wrong. Irreverence is the best medicine to cure someone of faith.
Certain systems of belief and cultural practices are better cultivators of ignorance and lazy thinking. If you teach your kid to question nothing and punish them if they do, they will clearly be a more ignorant person than someone who is perpetually encouraged to question and think about the world. Its a romantic Idea to think that religous and non-religous people will have the same level of ignorance, but I just don't think that's the case. It should be noted however that non-religous people can be extremely ignorant. If people are told not to believe in a god and mindlessly going along with it, it is going to be just as effective for cultivating ignorance as telling someone to believe in a god purely on faith
@@hypock1 yes it's religion can cause that but more times than not it's other factors eg poverty causes ignorance far more times than not. Besides that would be denying a basic human right to force no religion. Forcing a religion or forcing no belief/worship causes greater social tension, in which that stifles progress. So I don't see your argument fits in irl about perhaps that's my ignorance
The ignorance is strong in this one lol
You are one of the smartest people on UA-cam. Every time i watch your videos you always surprise me about how many layers down you go.
I don't remember being pierced by a spear...
Very nice way of referencing to Plato's cave allegory without actually mentioning it. Well implemented. Nice video.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
I agree, the Moon is far more relevant and interesting. im not sure why people are so set on Mars.
Wotah
Armstrong recently said when he really got how significant his lie had been was when he was told by a Livestrong worker that they were so angry at him as they had felt / become complicit in his lie... great video, thanks.
I thought the Arc had been found...
Armenia is beautiful. I wish I could live there. Maybe I can say I’m Canadian and not American? lol
This show is informative, and strikes a certain choir every now and again. This was one of those episodes.
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.
The one thing that pissed me off was the fact you called the Journeys to the moon useless. It wasn't about the destination but about the journey, this resulted in new technology and it motivated a generation of scientist. No one said that there was salvation on the moon, or an ark or piles of gold.
Haas I don't know where you believe I called the journey to the Moon useless.
He didn't call it useless. I think you need to rewatch the video.
2:00 I love how this supposes that one of the 4 must be telling the truth instead of supposing the more plausible reality that they could all be lying.
The point of colonizing Mars is to ensure the survival of humanity in case something terrible happens to Earth. The Moon does not suit that purpose as it's too close. It's a difficult, long term goal but Elon Musk decided to get started on it. Luckily he doesn't have a monopoly on space exploration, so anyone else is free to colonize the Moon in the mean time.
Mars won't work, it's gravity is to low they're just doing this for money and an audience. Many are turning away from Mars to making sky cities in Venus because of gravity. High enough from Venus's harsh pressurized surface, in the sky, gravity becomes very similar to earths. Now, when you're in space your bones deteriorate faster than someone with osteoporosis for the same reason a fish from the bottom of the ocean falls apart when brought to the surface. So why would Mars have a different effect, it'd just happen slower.
The point of colonizing Mars is to make money
Colonizing Mars for the sake of money is the most cynical take on it yet. If a large asteroid hits Earth again (this has happened many times throughout history already, causing mass extinctions every time), we're all dead. Humanity is gone. Finished. Game over. We simply have to spread to other planets or there is no hope for our future.
Alexander we have cataloged the world ending asteroids and have most of the 1km sized asteroids cataloged and we have several plans for dealing with asteroids however there is no large asteroid in earths orbital path so there is little danger from asteroids at this point
While it's true that there aren't any enormous asteroids that we know of headed towards Earth right now, we most certainly do not have any means of solving that sort of problem. There are plenty of plans, I'm sure, but no real contingencies, let alone sufficient hardware. Regardless, asteroid impacts are not the one and only problem that humanity may face. They are merely the most instantly devastating.
In any case, it remains true that colonizing another planet just for money is a preposterous insinuation.
I would argue that a religion does not require a god; It requires an unquestionable truth. What separates science from religion is not just the knowledge of what we don't know, but the desire to find out. Resigning ourselves to the idea that there are some things human kind may just never know is as harmful as saying it's just god's will. We advance by the pursuit of that knowledge that it just outside of our grasps.
Will reaching Mars change us? Yes. Even if we are unable to colonize Mars, even if it doesn't contain water, useful material, or life, it moves the goalposts a little big farther. It extends the goal to the next thing we can strive for. We may not have been put on this planet with a purpose, but we have created one. And in trying to attain those goals, we find things that make our existences better.
God is an abstraction, like concept of tomorow - does it exist? Can you see it?. But acting if tomorow exists keeps us civil and we achieve great things. Remove not rational belief in tomorow and see what happens. No Mars for these people thats for sure.
Also the defining feature of delusion or dogma is that it's resistant or immune to evidence/experience. Your comparisons are flawed in that respect.
It reminds me of a similar equivocation of 'everyone has an ideology' or 'everyone has faith in something' - well, no, you're just not identifying what makes an ideology an ideology, or faith faith, under those usages of the terms. I mean you're free to use words however you see fit, but the content is kind of important, and if you're using it in a way that does not reflect how everyone else uses it, that's either a mistake or disingenuous - in this case I think it's just a very common mistake people make... because people are terrriiible at thinking.
I, for one, am spellbound by this video. Coming from a family that has never engaged in religion, I found this video very thought-provoking. The thing I admire most about your videos is that even when I disagree with the statement, I always think about it first. There is something comforting to these videos. And I believe that they’ve grown better over time- the beginnings were also beautiful, but the eloquence and softness of the words gets better every time.
You say what needs to be said. I give my respects
The spear is a metaphor. It was made of light and fire and it enlightened the receiver whom was the one called the Davidic One. Meaning the one with the highest level of influence which is drawn from having the highest level of consciousness in a particular realm - Earth in our case.
The pearced one is Goddess Nemesis reincarnation St Padre Pio. She is back again as a woman this time and is know in the Ether or in between lives as "the most clean one"
Jesus on the other hand translates to Lord/Master is salvation.
The Greek Goddess Nemesis is also known as Lady Justice, or the most feared of the gods.