Testing Rodinal Dilutions with Ilford Ortho under Safelight

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
  • QUICK LINKS
    SFLaB BEGINNERS GUIDE TO FILM PHOTOGRAPHY & DARKROOM
    payhip.com/b/RtMY
    JOIN SFLaB UA-cam COMMUNITY MEMBERS AREA
    / @shootfilmlikeaboss
    SUPPORT MY CHANNEL ON PATREON
    / shootfilmlikeaboss
    ORIGINAL PRINTS FOR SALE
    www.etsy.com/u...
    THE SFLaB WEBSITE
    www.rogerlowe....
    FACEBOOK
    / shootfilmlikeaboss
    INSTAGRAM
    / shootfilmlikeaboss
    ABOUT THIS VIDEO
    Off I go again playing with Ortho and Rodinal.
    Test 1
    1/25 6.5 Minutes
    Test 2
    1/50 15 Mins
    Test 3
    1/25 Continuous Inversions 2 Mins
    Test 4
    1/25 Continuous Inversions 3 Mins
    Test 5
    Stand Dev.
    EQUIPMENT USED
    CAMERA - Olympus OM20
    FILM - Ortho 80
    DEVELOPER - Rodinal (RO9)
    STOP & FIX - Fotospeed
    ENLARGER - DURST M605
    PAPER -
    DEVELOPER -
    STOP & FIX - FOTOSPEED
    PRODUCTION GEAR
    CANON 6D, GOPRO 7 BLACK, TASCAM DR10L MIC, SENHEISSER SHOTGUN MIC,
    NEEWER LED PANELS, GVM COLOUR PANELS,
    Editing - FCP, PHOTOSHOP, LIGHTROOM
    ABOUT MY VIDEOS
    If my videos inspire, create ideas and help others in film photography and darkroom work then it's worth making them.
    I always welcome comments that are useful towards the video subject that will help others understand the process within.
    Keep shooting and thanks for watching.
    MUSIC CREDITING
    UA-cam Studio Music

КОМЕНТАРІ • 67

  • @petervanorsouw2858
    @petervanorsouw2858 3 роки тому +2

    Hi i have always wondered how the development process would look as the image is being made, of interest was the fixing, watching the film clear. It is has been the best experience of the picture making process for me since seeing a print being formed. Thank you for doing these sort of experiments 👍📸🥂

  • @josephasghar
    @josephasghar 3 роки тому +1

    For those considering setting up a darkroom, it’s a great way to remain creative in winter months or during lockdown. There is simply no comparison between a scanned and developed darkroom print. I set mine up in my office and take the results to the kitchen sink for washing, so it’s possible to do without a dedicated space. Treat yourselves!

  • @deanc6515
    @deanc6515 3 роки тому +1

    Another interesting video. A first seeing film develop under safelight for me. Thanks again Roger.

  • @actone11
    @actone11 Рік тому

    Ilford Ortho is an outstanding film with the following procedure : Expose at 40 asa (incident light metering), presoak for 5 minutes at 20°C, process in Microphen 1+3 for 12 minutes at 20°C, as for agitation ... 10 seconds every 6O... no further comment.

  • @paulstillwell
    @paulstillwell 3 роки тому +1

    Really cool being able to watch this process!

  • @Mortarss
    @Mortarss 3 роки тому

    Thanks for this! Really enjoy your videos. Your approach to all these is second to none. Keep up the excellent work.

  • @michaelgermundson8166
    @michaelgermundson8166 3 роки тому

    I always appreciate your tests, results and energy!

  • @kayliemo2056
    @kayliemo2056 3 роки тому

    oooh, I've got an illford sportsman too! its a bit fogged though, haven't tried shooting with it.

  • @peterangusphotography3423
    @peterangusphotography3423 2 роки тому +1

    I’ve been enjoying your videos for quite a while and just thought I’d say how much I’m enjoying your work. It’s great to see a real down to earth bloke getting on with film and showing us how it really is in the real world, even when things might not work out as you expected.
    You’ve no doubt been influential in my decision to do darkroom printing rather than just developing and scanning my work as I’ve been doing so far. I’ve assembled everything I need at little cost from Gumtree and am more excited than I expected so see what happens on my very first go! Watching you at work has given me confidence that I know just what to do and have high expectations!
    I’ve had a few holidays to the Isle of Wight which adds an extra level of interest for me but I was wondering, if generally confined to the island do you ever feel limited in subject matter? Also, do you plan to attend the Photography Show this September at the NEC, the analogue spotlight area will be there again and bigger than ever I suppose. There are many interesting talks to attend and interesting people to meet.

    • @ShootFilmLikeaBoss
      @ShootFilmLikeaBoss  2 роки тому

      Thanks Peter. I may attend the show. Long way from me here. I do like most of us get bored of the same scenes. Of course there are the seasons which break things up a bit. And sea and landscapes are always different with dramatic sky's. I love street photography and that is mainly where I get same old because the streets I've walked a thousand times. It's nice to get off and get some new

  • @loukashareangas4420
    @loukashareangas4420 3 роки тому +7

    Instructions unclear, will be using thyme water from now on to develop my films

  • @dominicmeakin
    @dominicmeakin 3 роки тому +3

    An idea for a future Wednesday wonder: Would placing a B&W negative on top of a strip of ortho film under a safelight with some glass, then exposing it briefly to white light as if you were making a contact print, make a good positive image when developed?

  • @malcsayer7133
    @malcsayer7133 3 роки тому

    Another wicked video.... 👍

    • @ShootFilmLikeaBoss
      @ShootFilmLikeaBoss  3 роки тому

      Glad you enjoyed it

    • @malcsayer7133
      @malcsayer7133 3 роки тому

      Always, and although I see the serious side I also see the funny side of some of your antics I.e robbing your wife and daughter's stuff 😂

    • @ShootFilmLikeaBoss
      @ShootFilmLikeaBoss  3 роки тому +1

      @@malcsayer7133 HA HA. I can only be me Malc. Going live Saturday night for YT members. 7pm Uk Time.

  • @angelusrufus7479
    @angelusrufus7479 3 роки тому

    As a lazy guy, I prefer stand developing. But here you can clearly see that a 1:50 and 1:25 solution gives a much better effect.

  • @mikkokovasiipi
    @mikkokovasiipi 3 роки тому

    I have a shot glass too for rodinal. 😅 Thanks for the video!

  • @carstennorwaynorge2195
    @carstennorwaynorge2195 3 роки тому

    Intersting test and video 👍🏻

  • @AxelEckenberger
    @AxelEckenberger 3 роки тому

    From my experience with rotary development a 15% reduction for development time yields the best results. This also seems to be the suggestions from the info sheets by the manufacturers.

  • @micheledesantis5762
    @micheledesantis5762 3 роки тому

    Your videos are really cool and it's such great fun looking at you especially when I can't go myself to my darkroom! A little advice if I may: developement times and concentration should be adjusted depending on the contrast of the scene. This is such an important tool to get easily printable negative in the majority of the scenes; this dooes require some little tests because it all depends on your entire system (enlarger, paper, paper developer etc.) and so dev times can't be unique for everybody and every scene. It's something worth taking a look at. Tests seem boring but they sure make you save lots of time and paper once you've done them ;) ! Cheers!

    • @ShootFilmLikeaBoss
      @ShootFilmLikeaBoss  3 роки тому

      Of course. A contrasty scene outside on a bright sunny day , develop slightly less time. ?

    • @micheledesantis5762
      @micheledesantis5762 3 роки тому

      @@ShootFilmLikeaBoss Exactly! The basis of the zone system is "expose for the shadows and develop for the highlight" . A very rough advice if you don't want to test anything is the following:
      - From medium to high contrast scenes, set the ISO of your film at half the box speed and reduce the developement time of about the 30% of the one decleared by the manufacturer;
      - For low contrast scenes expose at box speed and develop for the time indicated by the manufacturer.
      Otherwise a simple test could be this: expose 3 scenes, one high contrast, one medium and one low contrast. Each scene must be exposed with a wide bracketing (box speed, 1 stop underexposure, and 1-2 stops overexposure, 4 shots in total). The exposures must be repeated in three different rolls (or film stripes if you can cut them) that will be developed separately. Develope the first roll for the manufacturer time, the second for 30% less and the 3rd for 50% less. With these three rolls you will be able to see what ISO are best for each contrast and even more important what dev time is best for each contrast. It's a little long but it pays off.
      Manufacturers dev times are just suggestions and I would defenitely not look at the massive dev chart if you want more accurate results ;) . It's a bit long but I hope I can help you! If you have more doubts just ask! Keep up the good stuff, I really love your channel!

    • @christiancardona9889
      @christiancardona9889 3 роки тому +1

      @@micheledesantis5762 @Shoot Film Like a Boss, that would be a great test to see (if I may suggest)

  • @VictorBezrukov
    @VictorBezrukov 3 роки тому

    Thank you for these tests and the explains about. Actually, i also wanted to see the printed test 1/25 Continuous Inversions 3 Mins just curious to compare it to test 1 or 2. thank you

  • @ritonmhilli
    @ritonmhilli 3 роки тому

    Thanks for sharing

  • @stevebills2427
    @stevebills2427 3 роки тому

    I missed the episode when you asked about darkrooms so I'll add it here...Small closet darkroom that I can print up to 11x14 in.

  • @PiratePhD
    @PiratePhD 3 роки тому

    If you ever have money to spare you should buy a Sony a7s III for filming in the darkroom. You may even be able to dim the safelight more.

    • @ShootFilmLikeaBoss
      @ShootFilmLikeaBoss  3 роки тому

      I use a Canon 6D. Normally at ISO 6400 UNDER THE RED LIGHT!

  • @mamiyapress
    @mamiyapress 3 роки тому

    Have you ever tried Stand development with Table Salt ? another idea for a Wednesday Wonder perhaps.

  • @chriswilcockson8595
    @chriswilcockson8595 3 роки тому

    So, you can fix in day/white light? Excellent video - oops , just re-watched and see I missed the bit about not fixing in daylight!

    • @ShootFilmLikeaBoss
      @ShootFilmLikeaBoss  3 роки тому +1

      I wouldn't recommend it Chris. I just did it for video .

  • @iainmc9859
    @iainmc9859 3 роки тому +2

    Did the stand development take a long 'thyme' ;-)

  • @theoldfilmbloke
    @theoldfilmbloke 3 роки тому

    '1 second shutter speed' ??? What about 'Reciprocity Failure due to the 1 second and also is it not true that ORTHO film is not up to 'Box Speed' under 'Tungsten Lights' if they contain a lot of wavelengths in the RED end ?

    • @ShootFilmLikeaBoss
      @ShootFilmLikeaBoss  3 роки тому

      It's fine at 1s Pete. And the bulb isn't tungsten. It's a white bulb. It it was tungsten I'd have to shoot it at 40 ISO.

  • @devroombagchus7460
    @devroombagchus7460 3 роки тому

    Thanks. As always interesting and well explained. One (stupid) question: why use (slow) Ortho film? Surely not because you can have some light all the time in the darkroom?

  • @robhosailor
    @robhosailor 3 роки тому

    Very interesting video!
    I wonder if a special camera would be useful for your experiments with single frames - I have two very old Exakta cameras, as far as I know all of them since the first pre-war 1936 Kine Exakta version have a built-in internal cutter to cut off a piece of exposed film, right on at the cassette. As far as I know, this solution was not widespread in other cameras. The 1960s-1970s Exakta are still available at the flea market, fairly cheap, often in good condition, and require no repair, although sometimes they are. Maybe it's worth trying? Oh, I love to use my old Exakta cameras a lot, but personally I have never used that built-in knife before. Just thought it was probably a useful tool. Best regards.

    • @ShootFilmLikeaBoss
      @ShootFilmLikeaBoss  3 роки тому +2

      I never knew they existed. Very Interesting.

    • @robhosailor
      @robhosailor 3 роки тому +1

      @@ShootFilmLikeaBoss I just found a photo on the internet:
      images.app.goo.gl/tH56kyAoxe1uHoe4A
      My Exakta Varex VX from 1956 allows you to use a detachable and open-close cassette instead of a take-up reel - then you can cut off a longer section of the exposed film from the camera, conveniently and safely in the daylight, which you develop, and then continue shooting at the rest of the film from the original cassette.

    • @ShootFilmLikeaBoss
      @ShootFilmLikeaBoss  3 роки тому +2

      Thats awesome! Thanks for sharing...

    • @robhosailor
      @robhosailor 3 роки тому +1

      @@ShootFilmLikeaBoss You are welcome! I am glad that I could be useful for something.

    • @MrRecall200
      @MrRecall200 3 роки тому +1

      Funny enough my first slr was a 1956 exacta I bought for 2 bucks in like 2004. I used that thing a bunch and loved it including the knife and ability to have a light tight take up canister. After I got more in to cameras and got a few more I actually missed having that knife action huge. So convenient to have all your exposed film already wound straight in to an empty light tight canister. And it meant you could switch films as often as you wanted to, and in daylight. Sadly it got to the point where I couldn't touch up the light leaks in the curtain shutters anymore, so I took it apart to start putting new curtains in it and its been in a shoe box in pices for 10 years probably. One day all actually fix it because they are a truly sweet camera to use, all though a bit ass backwards if your used to a more modern slr control setup.

  • @lensman5762
    @lensman5762 3 роки тому

    Curious. I would have thought that 1+50 would give lower contrast than 1+25. Perhaps 15 minutes is a little too long. I would have rated the film @ iso 50 and just developed for 11 minutes a starter. Thanks for this video.

    • @ShootFilmLikeaBoss
      @ShootFilmLikeaBoss  3 роки тому +1

      I expected that also! But I saw no difference visually. Maybe it's cooked at 15 mins!

    • @lensman5762
      @lensman5762 3 роки тому

      @@ShootFilmLikeaBoss Curious. On my laptop the 15 minute exposure shows more contrast. The background is lighter than the exposure at 6.5 minutes and the shadow to midtone contrast is slightly higher too.

  • @michaelberger1001
    @michaelberger1001 3 роки тому +1

    First comment 💪🏻
    Edited: btw nice and informative video 😊👌🏻

  • @qnetx
    @qnetx 3 роки тому

    Any difference in noticeable grain between the Stand dev and the 1:25 negs.?

    • @ShootFilmLikeaBoss
      @ShootFilmLikeaBoss  3 роки тому +1

      Not a great deal as it was but I did say that stand print would have needed longer under the enlarger with contrast filters so after that possibly would show more grain than 1/25.

  • @user-rh2qy7ud9s
    @user-rh2qy7ud9s 3 роки тому

    rodinal is more grainy than d76?do u recommend rodinal for 135?

    • @jonnoMoto
      @jonnoMoto 3 роки тому

      For 135 I found it good for Trix, xp2, tmax100 and fp4. I also found it good for neopan400/1600 but that's long discontinued.
      Did not like it for Delta 3200(unsurprisingly), hp5, foma 200+400 (liked it for 120)

    • @user-rh2qy7ud9s
      @user-rh2qy7ud9s 3 роки тому

      @@jonnoMoto ok, thanks for your info.

    • @ShootFilmLikeaBoss
      @ShootFilmLikeaBoss  3 роки тому

      For me it depends what I want. If I want gritty street shots TRI_X 400 and Rodinal work well. D76, from my experience, is cleaner.

  • @steveh1273
    @steveh1273 3 роки тому

    I assume your stand development was at 1:100 (you didn't specify). The result for stand was so weak you must not have had enough R09 in there for that piece of film to develop completely. The developer ran out before the film fully developed.

    • @ShootFilmLikeaBoss
      @ShootFilmLikeaBoss  3 роки тому

      It was 1/100. I used 0.5ml in the jar. Ha Ha. Probably as you say.