How to Choose a Religion | Christianity vs Atheism vs Paganism
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 вер 2024
- Religion is the foundation for all thought - the wrong religion will ruin you and your people
Yet no-one talking about religion (that I've seen) can actually peer into it on a fundamental level and understand what it actually is
WHY it matters emotionally
HOW it has to be SEEN before it can be TACKLED
Here I dig into it
~
If you want to get in touch with me and do DEEP work on;
APPLYING Jung and Nietzsche
Exploring Art Therapy
Tackling your Anxiety.
Follow this magic link and we can set up a call:
boyoalert.type...
~
Want to LISTEN as you Work or Drive?
The Boyocast is on Spotify, Overcast, Anchor and WAY more
Check it out:
fanlink.to/boy...
~
Like my Music?
Check out more on Spotify, Soundcloud, Deezer, and Tidal:
podlink.to/ube...
~
Uberboyo Instagram:
/ uberboyo
On psychology and religion:
When educated society generally agreed that the universe is a cold dead machine - Christianity tanked
This was bad because suddenly our lusts no longer meant "Satan!" and our considerate behavior no longer meant "Christlike"
We became emotional messes
In order to solve this, several thinkers tried to put together a set of ideas that accepted the "cold dead machine" worldview, but also made sense of ones emotions
Freud was a famous example, though Nietzsche is unsung as laying most of these foundations
Freud basically took the "will to mate" as the driving force in our emotional lives and many of our issues as the result of us not having the power to get hot lovers
i.e. you hate your father secretly because he is the alpha male in the house, you are neurotic because you can't get laid
If you were getting that sweet smash you would be happy and fulfilled
Basically, how to understand your emotions was tied to understanding their roots in the desire for sex
Jung liked all this... but thought it was very cynical regarding religion and individuality
"We're just sex robots, and religion is a tool for priests to get social status"
Jung wanted to assume that there was something in us that wished to become great not for sex, but for some type of artistic fulfillment
i.e. I just want to experience what its like to sing like Pavarotti, imagine that power pouring out of your mouth
This was a problem, as it required the universe to be more than a cold dead machine - but in fact a place that for some reason wanted human excellence
This precisely contradicts with the modern educated position of what the universe is - a dead machine - hence most don't take Jung seriously
Jung certainly didn't help this by getting into his theories of the collective unconscious, synchronicity, and quantum theories
He was terrified of being "found out" and discredited, and you'll notice that Peterson NEVER brings up this side of Jung
Nonetheless, I think Jung's idea of human's striving for excellence is great and a much healthier position to take then Freud's
It's something Nietzsche, Jung, and JBP all share
I'll touch on all this In this video and more
Boyo! Long time subscriber and donator. Would love to have a quick discussion if you're inclined. Could lead to a fruitful relationship. Cheers. Van.
@@canbiicomedy sure dude, coudl you email me at boyoalert?
@@anicego3847 haha the secert of creepy voice power ;)
I like this approach way much better. Christian apologetics (especially) tries to justify and make excuses for itself to the cold dead machine or 'The Whole Show' as C.S. Lewis calls it. In opposition to anti-theism you pose instead the refusenik approach where you criticise and lay bare the paucity of Modernthink, the machine model of reality and propose one supportive of human life. In the end, you cease to find conciliation with materialism, you reject it and say you won't eat crap. There are a few boyos on the internets hoisting that banner and I think you know who many of them are. Keep up the good work.....^^.......
Uberboyo man is god time and space are functions of ones conceptual scheme
I just want to say I really appreciate these videos dearly! They have catapulted me into the journey of the artist and has breathed a fresh breath of meaning into my life. From a sinner, to another sinner, thank you!
brilliant to hear!
Thanks boyo
Very very interesting a deep subject to think about... to introspect
I believe that I myself am coming into a sort of Hermetic Pantheism. When beginning to take seriously the notion that "ALL is mind and the mind is ALL", the argument of god pantheons, heavens, and hells all being imaginary doesn't quite seem like a valid refutation.
Spinoza, a pantheist, was practically the only philosopher Nietzsche had good things to say about. He's also genius. Worth reading.
I think Nietzsche actually thought along these lines... quite interesting stuff
@@Orgotheonemancult Yeah, I think Einstein held Spinoza in high regard, too, if I recall correctly. Thanks for the recommendation.
@@uberboyo Steph, I used to think that Nietzche and Jung were opposite ends, but you and James did well in illustrating the contrary:
Nietzsche's raw, earthy Will to Power might've been sort of the "teaser trailer" for Jung's numinous, new Living God of the "Red Book". We "killed God" by making him / it / us this external abstraction, so we now have to be the virgin mothers of our own reincarnated God / selves.
@@falloutmanize very good take
Love listening to your story telling. What you paint in my mind is inspiring.
Agape is the greatest of the Christian virtues, as Paul tells us: it is the true way of the
Christian. But why? Because it is good, i.e., a virtue?
Not exactly. Agape is a road along which one
travels in imitation of Christ, to penetrate to the core-deepest ontological layer-of suffering (his
passion and crucifixion), and there, if you follow that road-and that road only-you arrive at the
secret: the Resurrection-which is the miraculous conversion of suffering into ecstasy, which is
uniquely the Christian miracle; this is how Christianity and Christianity alone solves the problem of
suffering. This solution is not a philosophical, intellectual understanding (e.g., why there is suffering)
but an event: the dramatic conversion of suffering, not into mere stoic apathy, the mere lack of
suffering, but into its affective and ontological bipolar opposite: ecstasy-and here, precisely,
Dionysus-Zagreus enters; Jesus “is” Dionysus-Zagreus as a solution to suffering; this is not just
ecstasy but, more, ecstasy as the conversion of suffering. (This conversion is not found in the
Dionysian-Orphic system; ecstasy is sought for its own sake.)
I loved reading your comments. Where can I find more information about Jesus such as you teach. Any resources? Christ has certainly carried me my entire life.
Just to say i really enjoy the vídeos, the thinking aloud... a newly joined "Goyo", keep It up
Christianity vs paganism will forever haunt me and I'll forever be incomplete before solving this question
its a tough cookie alright... I think Neech and even Jung offer an insight on a "new way forward"
@@uberboyo mate I just wanna be with my little lad and wife in whatever comes after this life 😅 don't want the ride to end
Hermeticism is phenomenal. If you havent read it yet i would start with the kybalion by 3 initiates. Life changing book
Kybalion is hardly an authentic Hermetic work. It's more like a product of the primitive ancestors of the current new-age spirituality, theosophy to be exact. The actual Hermetica are gold, calling Kybalion lead in that context would be a compliment.
Let me know what you decide, boys. Surf the Kali Yuga. 🏄
SURF BOYOS
Based
This is just amazing. Thank you for producing this kind of contant 😊
Stephan... one again, a great video. The international boyo conference just transformed into the boyo institution for reframe and enlightenment
PAGANISM NOW AND FOREVER!!! All hail the true old gods!!!
OMG a Roman Army just flew over my house!
@@uberboyo That scenario is about as plausible as finding an authentic revival of ancient paganism, haha.
@Radagast ua-cam.com/video/leK2WkAHLYk/v-deo.html
@@ALLHEART_ Jesus is the truth, seek and you shall find peace and wisdom.
@Arthur Thesillyking 🙏🏼
I think you are onto something here. I have been in a similar thought pattern as of late, I can’t bring myself to be religious anymore. Top notch here boyo.
Look into Orthodox Christianity, my friend.
ALLHEART _ no thanks
@@CJS1986 I get it. You feel burned by religion. But remember this: Isaiah 43:1.
ALLHEART _ I was never burned by religion, but more of I have never connected with one. I do envy those who have, but like @uberboyo said, some people just can’t.
thanks G! lets see how it evovles!
38:43 Well since I'm soon graduating and will be a chemist I will put my thougts about this here because this is in the middle of my territory. Intention is a tricky question because if everything is chemistry that automatically creates determinism. Chemical reaction always reacts the same way, with the same speed and energy, in the same conditions. This means that everything is just aftermath of the beginning. That means that the beginning defined everything that happened and will happen, and we are basically just watching a movie. We don't even have a free will, only illusion of it.
39:37 Oh yes they should react, and today we even know how that reaction happens. Brain cells have certain chemical states, and when that state get's a certain stimuli it reacts. Meaning that there is a programming what get's a reaction and what doesn't. That programming is mostly due to your DNA, but also made by your upbringing and life experiences. We are biochemical robots. Human is the only animal that reacts to art, as far as we know, but there's a reason for it. DNA. When we hear music for example, it set's a reaction cascade that releases endorphins. Endorphins are a chemical signal molecules that cause another cascade that together with the previous one gives you that emotion.
40:03 And that is problematic that we think we are only rationality. That's so small part of us. People don't realize that we mostly follow our emotions and we mostly react emotionally. It's so automatic that we don't even notice it. We are emotional creatures first. That is our foundation. Everything has it's purpose, rationality and emotions. There's balance.
In the end the chemistry is just parts used to build a construction. It's not the parts where the beauty is, but in how they are used. The blueprint. We shouldn't concentrate on what we are made of, but who we are.
44:21 There are different kind of people. Discovery through rational thinking has given me the biggest satisfactions in life so far, and it is what I live for.
45:00 Couldn't agree more. Beautifully put.
Brilliant, thank you!
The determinism one is a big deal I find, perhaps God set the game in motion - it would be interesting to match modern chemistry and determinism to the ancient Greek notion of "we are playthings of the Gods"
Oui m8, great content.
I think the bass boost on your mic is really hard to listen to on speakers/monitors tho. Sounds overly EQ'd
Check out the XM8500 if you need a good cheap dynamic mic for VO. Great for blocking background noise and room reverb, and you get a nice radio tone without EQ.
It's easy to make the mistake of EQing your audio for your own headphones.
Unfuckingbelievable my good friend!!!! Might be your best work yet... and of course, nothing but a result of life rewarding you for serving it!
Thank you sir, we must SERVE THE JUICINESS ;)
You are one hell of a boyo, this was phenomenal
For the,this has been a constant problem.
I feel my conscience split between ortodox christianity and Nietszche s framework,which has many of it s roots in pegan culture.
A great support for ortodox cristiamity i can find in brothers karamatsov,and for the other perspective i find zarathustra to be the main point if refference.
Yet,i can t help but agree with both to some level.
Yup, I'm caught aswell - in the vid I try to lay out the problem properly
@@uberboyo Yeah. I'd highly recommend talking with Jonathan Pageau about Orthodoxy if you can get a hold of him. He's talked with Paul VanderKlay (whom you've also talked with), and is friends with JBP. If not him, I'd talk to Church of the Eternal Logos or Jay Dyer. Church of the Eternal Logos has a background in New Age stuff, psychodelics, and the occult.
@@ALLHEART_ I'd be happy to!
If you are in their circles could you ask either them to email me at boyoalert
I've reached out to them, but they never replied!
@@uberboyo That's no good. I'll see what I can do! Is it boyoalert@gmail.com?
@@ALLHEART_ yes!
So this is where Boyoism began
I've started dressing in all white since this video weirdly...
Hail Zeus! Hail Thor!! Hail Perkunas!!!
Salve regina! Ave Maria! Pater noster! Chrístos anésti!
Halfway through the video I had to pause, because you went balls deep on the Death of God concept and Freud, I had to catch a breath. Jesus man!
all the way in!
2:19 McKenna vibe
World evolves into the Body
of Christ; world as pieces that seen acting and operating together became-were now-Christ as
cosmic body. So it is world first; or rather they, as plural pieces, are world. Then they come together
so that the they becomes an it, one body made up of all the many objects and processes that were-
that had formerly been-the world. The lower plural evolve into the higher unitary. This was one
process seen two ways, seen inwardly and outwardly. Yet you could still say, “His body was
camouflaged as world. World was transubstantiated into Christ’s Body.” But it isn’t Christ’s Body
posing as world; it is world becoming-joining together to form-Christ’s body. Again: it is a cosmic
evolution. Not the higher invading the lower but the lower evolving into the higher, with pieces of
world added element by element to complete and perfect this titanic body, a body so vast that I could
only comprehend dimly enormous-infinite-volumes of space, space such as I had never conceived
or apprehended before. Larger than the universe, which in comparison is merely finite. Limited. And
all of it was alive and all of it thought. And the pieces didn’t just happen to fit together; they didn’t
just haphazardly come together; Christ himself searched for the pieces, took the pieces, placed each
piece of the world in place correctly, integrated, beautiful, a kosmos, a macrokosmos that was good,
beautiful, pleasing and harmonious, where all the many parts that had been world interacted as one
unity.
* And yet absolutely in no way was this vast body anthropomorphic; it was not a human body. It
was a permanent body that continually became more reticulated and arborized and complex and
perfect, that had once been world.
To share-experience-the joy by the Godhead as it invades-expands into-the animal
kingdom, lost to it all these many millennia! The repair to the damaged Godhead! Yes, it is a selfrepair, a reinhaling, a recovery of part of its lost self. Christ reknitting the decomposing cosmos and
restoring it to God. Christ moves lower and lower, deeper and deeper into the decomposing cosmos,
down layer by layer, starting with man. Thus the vision of Christ at and in the trash layer (stratum) is a
vision of ultimate and final repair.
VALIS what’s your take on the Antichrist then? Also, are you familiar with the R.C Christian monuments?
MetaPhysicallyMotivated what is that?
You take the text (which is linear, sequential and digital) of “Acts” and convert it into
a world: objects in their mutual arrangement. (“Acts” is part two of Luke.) What is the basic story of
“Luke-Acts”? Jesus Christ. But when you turn it into a world, although the narrative is still there,
Jesus Christ cannot be seen (i.e., as an object among objects). The linear, digital text is now a gestalt
(Bild) and is read simultaneously but by the right hemisphere. (The linear digital text of course as
narrative is read by the left hemisphere.) Where now is Christ, if not an object among objects. He is
missing. Then you discover that in a unified total gestalt (pattern) read simultaneously by the right
hemisphere analogically Christ is present as the pattern itself: as unified totality. The puzzle is
solved. “Luke-Acts” is not a verbal narrative about Christ-i.e., referring to Christ-it is Christ
Found an Orthobro.
What is your opinion on Hinduism and eastern religions in general, or drawing from all?
The starting of this killed me I was like omg did I make a mistake turning to religion is this guy messin around then it gets real I laughed
The introjection of Christ into the system is certainly the epitome of the adding of ex nihilo
newness, of revitalizing creation as if from outside. Thus the term “Christ” has to refer to any and all
newness choices wherever and whenever they occur; “Christ” is the zero-one binary disjunctive event
per se, and so is always now and always here. We see it and understand that we see (and experience)
Christ, and this is newness, re-creation (in an unending process of creation). Christ never arises/occurs
as a result of the past, as an effect of antecedent causes; he is always born “from outside.” Hence his
epiphany can never be induced or predicted (by definition). Christ is that which does not follow
mechanically: he always invades world. To see, then, that Causality is not observed, that the “effect”
is in fact not an effect at all-of its Cause-but is ex nihilo new is to see-literally, not symbolically
-Christ. Hence where there is Christ it is always the case that there has been “a perturbation of the
reality field,” something acting on it, intruding on it, invading it, “from outside.” In terms of
mechanical cause-and-effect Christ can never be said to be a normal event derived from the
antecedent system.
Without these periodic insertions the system would run down; it would lose shape, organization
and vitality. Cause-and-effect, then, taken in itself, is a losing game. The only thing that Christ can be
said to be a result of-Christ as an event in the reality field-is the need of this event. It is physically,
mechanically causeless; it is absolutely teleological. Efficient causation has no bearing on it and will
never yield it up. (Here Pierre Teilhard de Chardin is totally wrong: world is not spontaneously
converging into the Point Omega; what he calls “Point Omega” is something done ceaselessly to
world, an endless invasion.) Wherever the effect is correctly seen to exceed its cause (which is then by
definition not its cause) there is Christ. Conversely, wherever effect follows cause actually, there he is
not. Christ, then, is an event, something that occurs in and to the reality field; Christ is not a person as
men are persons. Christ is the beginning of the universe all over again, as a repeated event.
All "religions" (or philosophies/ideologies, but I repeat myself) seem to leave a bad taste in my mouth anymore they all want to deny some aspect of life (what religion explicitly worships life, including death!) , what religion in it's current form can be said to be life-affirming to all, the great people in the traditions taught different paths to that which might be called salvation (truth seeking,moral goodness,silence,child-bearing and/or rearing,war,manly despair,love, and etc).
If you did want a religion of sorts it should explicitly affirm life in such a way
Maybe something more like Nikos Kazantzakis said in the sequel he wrote to the Odyssey "Though life's an empty shade, I'll cram it full of earth and air,of virtue,joy, and bitterness." or in Dune "If you need something to worship, then worship life - all life, every last crawling bit of it!", to worship life in and of itself. As for the metaphysics, this is tricky, but I think something could be done with panpsychism (e.g:The view that all matter has consciousness.") that would also reasonably explain emotions,make sense to a modern (or even perhaps an ancient), and be compelling and inspire us to some kind of great movement. All these words though, just go fucking experience being and all these paths don't be nailed down to any traditions, but don't take from them without gratitude you're like a blind man collecting colors
Inb4 Orthodoxy or Catholicism shills in replies
I think this is a good take - the term "becoming" is extremely useful to articulate this... sadly it is jargon
But basically, when you stand upon a mountain peak and stare across the horizon, and feel a huge rush of chemicals that carry a feelign of awe... that is the joy of becoming... that is living... that is "correct" worship
How could this be made the center ritual of a religion? that is to say... the common assertion of "goodness" and "right behavior"
The problem to me with trying to make that the center ritual, is that "becoming" (and being to a lesser extent) seem to require spontaneity and religions modern main method is rote learning and rules which seems incompatible to say the least. To solve this within the context of a religion alone seems impossible unless you're close to one of these great people of the traditions or willing to veer off on your own and have an extremely personal relationship with your religion or to develop the quality on your own and bring it back to the religion (assuming you didn't have it beforehand/naturally which is probably better). Something fundamental seems to have to change/be changed for any of this to be fixed for large # of people.
This is your best video bro.
thanks g, what do you like about it?
@@uberboyo It just puts your emotions into perspective better. I have trouble just accepting emotions or feeling as "there" in the way Buddhism and Stoicism try to explain on a surface level. But, if I view them as an entity trying to pull me into or away from chaos, they make it easier to understand.
Therefore Christ is present in the macrocosm-microcosm correspondence: (1) as all reality; (2) as
Scripture wherever it occurs. I utilize the idea expressed, e.g., in Matthew-and which I believe; Paul
often refers to this-that all Scripture-that is, the OT or Torah itself-secretly is an account of
Christ, and that this secret nature of Hebrew Scripture was only revealed at the time of the first
advent. In a certain mysterious way, then, the Torah “encloses” like a shell the knowledge of, the story
of, Christ, and therefore is Christ (but God concealed this even from the prophets through which he
spoke). Thus there is a secret accord between the two Testaments. This is why Jesus had power over
the Law (Torah), not the law (Torah) over him; it is fundamental to Pauline thought that Jesus Christ
is master not instrument of the Torah, and this fits with my perception of Jesus that day I read Luke:
he possessed unlimited miraculous powers such that reality itself (physical law: the moral law of the
Torah and the physical law of the cosmos form a unity, deemed heimarmene by the Gnostics) was
under his jurisdiction: it obeyed him as a servant. He revealed himself, even then (before the
resurrection), as Pantocrator. Having died and been resurrected he vanishes into the very reality of
which he is master, camouflaging himself (as Eliade discusses) and lives on in and as that reality in a
certain mysterious way, especially (as Mani taught) in the innocent vegetable kingdom but by no
means limited to it.
(He has a special affinity to it because it suffers without causing suffering; it
sacrifices itself to feed the animal and human kingdoms.)
You hear a voice crying out from the wilderness, but the wilderness is not out there. Hear your voice.
This material is truly for a "maximo superior boyo" !
Hey Uberboyo, someone in my recent video comments mentioned that you're at a point in your journey where you're trying to choose between paganism and Christianity. As someone who emerged from the world of the occult and ended up becoming Orthodox Christian, I'm happy to chat with you, either privately or in a YT video, if you're open to that. Perhaps with God's help I can show you why what the Church possesses is so far superior to everything that came before (and after) it.
sure, we could do it on your channel if you wish, might be interesting! email on boyoalert!
@@uberboyo Excellent, just sent you an email
Radagast lol ignorance at its finest
Choose the Self.
Gotta read the hindu non-dual tradition. The Upanishads. All is the mind. We are divinity fooling itself, dividing itself and playing itself so it can have the joy of reuniting itself to dissolve once again into the plurality of existence.
To see or experience the literal real presence of the savior in the doomed sufferer is perhaps to
have penetrated to the heart of Christianity. I witnessed it myself; I know by divine revelation. And
since Christ can and does become all living creatures (since all suffer undeservedly and die) he, like
Brahman, is ubiquitous (immanent) in the universe, moving toward a final disclosure that the universe
is only a form which God assumes, and that the ultimate result of this so-to-speak self-inflicted
(unknowingly) pain on its sentient parts is to restore to those parts their memories and hence true
identities. They awake, remember, know, and rejoin the urgrund. (“Tat Tvam Asi.”) So the unfair
pressures of an unknowing causal-and casual-universe reawaken the one sleeping mind in its
pluriforms. And so it encounters itself, who or what has inflicted undeserved pain or who or what?
God as creator or God as Son, and the 3rd member of the trinity, the Holy Spirit, is the agent which
effects this “blitz” or catalyst of remembering.
The jolt to remember lies in the very quality of the undeserved; puzzled and horrified by this
undeservedness, the organism must search for and must find not just an answer but the answer. It
becomes the sole key problem, and he knows that the key to everything lies in it. If he can grasp the
meaning of this he will possess all meaning.
I did not work out my “divine substitution” view theoretically-or a priori-; I saw it. Lived it
through revelation from the deity. I saw that suffering (undeserved) could not be avoided (again
Timaeus), but I also saw the most beautiful and touching mystery of all: the bringing into being by this
crushing process the Redeemer Himself.
How are we synchronized 😳 down to the very thoughts I’m thinking it’s so strange!
I’m playing Assassins Creed Valhalla at the moment which is pegged in a time of post Roman collapse, Anglo- Saxon Christianity and Norse Mythology.
The way they portray the Norse way of being makes it seem super right brain, poetic and natural. It makes perfect sense to me.
Since reading Jung & Nietzsche & keeping up with this channel I am seriously questioning the underpinnings and presuppositions of my existence. Which is causing a lot of mental anguish.
What if everything we have pegged our mode of being, our very map of existence is wrong?
That is fucking terrifying.
Great !
Hola Boyos. I was wondering if you boyos would do a video on the book "King, Warrior, Magician, Lover" by Robert Moore and Douglas Gillette which is based on the work of Jung and the archetypes within the male psyche.
Also, would you ever consider reaching out and doing a collab with the guy from the youtube channel "Academy of Ideas" to discuss Nietzsche and Jung?
Lastly, would you do some videos on Evola?
You guys are awesome, keep up the good work!
The Abrahamic religions are a variant mesh of the *PAGAN myths based on ASTROtheology 🌞*
1) Stars and planets and cosmology and geography
2) Prophetic dreams/visions
3) Astral projection/Lucid dreaming and meeting the entities
I raise you Non-duality ⭕
Goddamn. I love this.
In no way did Paul see Torah and Christ as progressive (evolutionary) stages in one
(information) organism. In fact who has? (1) Not the Jews, certainly; they revere the Torah as
absolute. (2) Not the Christians; they revolt against the Torah in the name of Christ: the concept of
evolution through qualitatively (and radically) different stages is unknown to them. That the Torah is
an earlier form of Christianity whose later form is Christ-no one sees this. Note: it would be wrong
to say: (1) the Torah as an earlier form of Christ; or (2) Christ is a later form of the Torah. Neither
statement is true. Both are stages of the so-to-speak third organism, and there is now a third and final
stage: Joachim’s spirit, in which each man has his own personal Scripture in his head, and each is
unique but recombined out of the info of the prior stages. This is an info entity, living info. It is
subduing and permeating the universe order: (organization) = info.
It does not become old and ossified; at the end it plays as a child like a free little animal.
Truly profound.
LETS FUCKING GOOOOOOOOO
I believe I've solved the disconnect between matter and consciousness, and it has to do with the Von Neumann Chain. A series of experiments by IONS sought to test whether consciousness, in particular focused attention, had any effect on quantum systems, and the data appeared to illustrate that. But if this is true, why are we special? Why not a computer?
Unlike a computer, when we get entangled in a quantum system through our senses, we process it recursively through our nervous system, allowing it to further collide and entangle with the resulting states of our neurons, weaving reality together into a braid of singular reality.
Polytheist and proud right here!
It’s all self only. Paganism is representations of the body, monotheism is based on a source of creation, atheism is choosing self only as is what is being presented. Yet it all leads back to a singular point of creation. Micro to macro don’t mattet
BoyosStayHighlyAlerted
Gospel ^^^
The Romans killed and ate the Sophia, this is the heart of the western mystery tradition.
i keep watching this channel and keep hating it, becuase I love living in my head and being logical.
haha what do you mean? I stimulate the logical side or speak against that?
@@uberboyo maybe I just don't understand what you mean by it. Perhaps I was already using my right brain more than I thought. I just like logic, and I hear be right brained not left brained, and I associate the left brain with logic. I don't remember if you said it on this video or the following one, but you said something about using the right side of the brain and being analytical, which I already like being analytical, but I thought that was a left brain thing, so I'm confused af at this point.
Why do you have to deal with the paradigm?
Your society is like your orchestra
You either play along blindly
Play out of tune stubbornly
Or play along and try to lead them
@@uberboyo why the need to play along to society. Play along to yourself and society will follow. This is how all the greats of the world evolved.
It is the paradigm that is in the way of yourself.
Alot better and clearer then most of the other vidoes i have seen from you.
But the idea of 'logos', isn't too far diffrent then what possessed scientists already follow too.
Maths, "universal laws", 'beauty' ect.
You being a musician is also analougus to how mathematicians seem to think that maths is a guide to reality. Psychology did it with jung, philosophy does it. Religion absolutly does it. ect.
Most fields 'diefy' themselves. Memes being memes.
As for the idea you present, again, very similar to 'will' in schopenhauer, with the diffrence that you impose a 'meaning' to the struggle. Or should i say a positive meaning to struggle. While he does the opposite, either negative, or 'indiffrent' depending on how you see it.
But just as with him, one has to ask, if you can 'interprate' 'metaphysical' struggle as a goal, as being part of some greater purpose, as being "a part of the universe". Why not do that regardless?
Meaning is afterall something we seem to impose on reality, as we have seen from history, and here you are presenting a new idea, or should i say an old idea, a meme.
Anyone who can accept it, should accept it if it gives their life meaning. Afterall there is no way to tell if its 'true' in any higher sense.
For everyone else, its just an old idea in new packegeing. And im not sure if it will 'solve' this problem.
43:00 say it all
Are you and Jimmyboi still chill, or are you now mortal enemies?
Yes, we're all good
Atheism is not a religion, that's like saying not stamp collecting is a hobby or not playing golf is a sport.
You have to be a gnostic to be conscious in this reflex machine DNA robot world.
YHVH says you wouldn't like the Romans if you knew what they really had in their consciousness
The true gnostics are all psychically linked together via the plasmate by the DNA
Y’know I think Buddhist philosophy would probably affect Christianity. At least positively. I subscribe to a Celtic form of Christianity, which is more life affirming
than traditional Christianity.
But I do think paganism & Christianity are both valid spiritual paths. I don’t think one superior to the other tbh.
Traditional, true Christianity (namely, Orthodox Christianity) IS life affirming, and has many excellent Celtic saints. Pagan types to not know the first thing about Christianity.
ALLHEART _ I know pagans who studied the Bible extensively. One is a Hellenic pagan & the other is a Canaanite pagan. Really smart cookies too.
I wouldn’t make assumptions about pagans not knowing Christianity. A lot of them came from a Christian background. Some of their experiences with Christianity were bad, neutral, or good.
@@marksalazar4086 That doesn't necessarily mean they understand Christianity. And do either of those friends perform animal sacrifices, or, in the case of the "Canaanite pagan", child sacrifice? I would think not.
Christianity vs Atheism vs Paganism vs Rastafari (modern and less corrupt christianity)
Hahaha. Bob Marley became an Ethiopian Orthodox Christian. The only person of note in that movement abandoned it. The Ethiopian Emperor was Christian. Rastafarianism is so absurd.
@@ALLHEART_ Old men with shiny clothes and titles is more absurd to me.
@@fghgkyuuyk6116 Beauty is essential, and priests should be robed in beautiful clothes. The visual beauty should suit the other sorts of beauty present in the worship.
@@ALLHEART_ The priest was needed when most could not read. Today they stand between us and God.
@@fghgkyuuyk6116 No, that was not and is not the only function of a priest. They aid us in our walk with God, they do the opposite of what you say they do.
Mr. Uber Boyo, thank you. If I point you to a place of harmony, will you accept the challenge?
The challenge is this: Do an exeption to your video format, make a reaction video. "A reaction video?! You mean to sell a bit of me for gaining views?" Nah, that's too dry of a view my boyo.
Listen, these things come together. We all sew the fabric of reality, let me hand you yarn. The challenge will how ever have rules: you should not watch the pointed video BEFORE the reaction take - it wouldn't be a reaction, would it.
I would be surprised if you didn't find the symbolism of the song I have in mind being a manifestation of your point.
If you accept the conditipns of agreement, I will throw a link. You w. o. u. l. d have views. Just life giving a random opportunity... 🤔 What did the Peterson talk about these opportunity things..
By the way, have you noticed that feelings come in wave like? Have you ever tracked your emotions? There's consistency, reaccuring phases and there's big chaotic periods like in puberty and 30's (the phases I have went through). It seems to be more of a rule than an exception.
Which video would you suggest as a reaction video?
Also, my internet is quite bad right now... so I can't make promises!
@@uberboyo Do not watch it before filming!
ua-cam.com/video/JYjIlHWBAVo/v-deo.html
Ever heard of Nightwish?
@@uberboyo Oh yes, if you know how to put subs on, that would help. ^^
J U C
Zoroastrianism
Is a lie
Jesus and the apostles are coming back for Jacob Rothschild
This planet does not have human wellness in mind. If bottle nosed dolphins had fingers, they likely would have had civilization before our species. We have intelligence AND fingers, which meant our ancestors could use tools, which aided in survival. Cooking our food caused our brains to grow over the centuries. Civilization affords us with language, which preserves information, which causes us to survive longer and longer, keeping the good traditions and throwing out the bad... except Christians aren't throwing away the bad, they are calling it their purpose in life. I wonder if dolphin gods are shaped like dolphins...