Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Finally! America Tests Its Insane New Supersonic Jet 😱 (The X-59)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 сер 2023
  • Finally! America Tests Its Insane New Supersonic Jet 😱 (The X-59)
    X-59: NASA will test its groundbreaking 'quiet' supersonic aircraft in the US. NASA will demonstrate its plans to test its Quiet Supersonic Technology (QueSST) over United States communities this week in Nashville.
    #america #test #supersonic #Plane #X59 #fastest #jet #quietsupersonic #XPlane #QueSST #plane #NASA’s #fighterjet #6thgeneration #supersonicplane #LockheedmartinX-59
    #boom #supersonic #concordeplane #supersonicaircraft #Concorde #americantacticalfighter

КОМЕНТАРІ • 484

  • @gregparrott
    @gregparrott Рік тому +30

    I like the addition of historical footage and information on the first supersonic test flights

    • @AmericanTacticalFighter
      @AmericanTacticalFighter  Рік тому +4

      thanks @@gregparrott

    • @SalvadorNavarro-qw7de
      @SalvadorNavarro-qw7de 10 місяців тому

      ​@@AmericanTacticalFighterq❤❤❤❤❤qq CT

    • @user-cy9zy7bd6s
      @user-cy9zy7bd6s 10 місяців тому +2

      Снова какой нибудь с 75 бородатой сшибут ничаянно😄
      Просто те ракеты не очень "умные' и им никто не рассказал, что это суперневидимка😅

    • @gregparrott
      @gregparrott 10 місяців тому

      @@user-cy9zy7bd6s Google translate yielded unintelligible results, The beginning translates to "Again someone with a 75 beard will be knocked down by accident
      ". Google was unable to translate the second half -The sentence following the smiley face.

    • @user-cy9zy7bd6s
      @user-cy9zy7bd6s 10 місяців тому +1

      @@gregparrott тебе надо ты и переводи.
      я пишу на одном из международных языков.

  • @LuisAguilar-tp2iz
    @LuisAguilar-tp2iz Рік тому +3

    American power the best 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲 god bless america 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

  • @ralphkassing6821
    @ralphkassing6821 11 місяців тому +37

    I grew up hearing sonic booms almost daily in the early 60s. I don’t remember anyone complaining. Most people that we knew were just very interested in what was being tested.

    • @sparty94
      @sparty94 10 місяців тому +1

      i would think broken windows would get old.

    • @PhonkEcho
      @PhonkEcho 4 місяці тому +1

      imagine the sound of bombs going off and windows shattering

    • @ralphkassing6821
      @ralphkassing6821 4 місяці тому

      @@PhonkEcho Yes that would be awful. We are so lucky in the US that that doesn’t happen here.

  • @victorrios8226
    @victorrios8226 11 місяців тому +4

    Great Job USA.... always forward.....👏👏👏

  • @JohnJohnson_01
    @JohnJohnson_01 11 місяців тому +4

    adorable bird🗽😊👍

  • @LIOTBs
    @LIOTBs 10 місяців тому +7

    I remember when I was little the Air Force would always fly over my town at supersonic speeds. The Sonic booms were really loud and the whole house would shake the windows would wobble visibly stuff would fall off the shelves. You could feel the sonic boom in your chest. I can only imagine how scared little children or babies would be with that. Even older people it could cause a heart attack. It happened on a weekly basis.

    • @jackspeer2127
      @jackspeer2127 10 місяців тому +2

      Me too. lived in Tucson, AZ. the jet jocks at Davis-Monthan would blow the sound barrier about 1-2 X per month. I was a kid and thought it was pretty cool, mom not so much.

    • @ETC_Rohaly_USCG
      @ETC_Rohaly_USCG 8 місяців тому +1

      A retired Coastie here, that went to a navy school in Pensacola FL… aka: home of the Blue Angles…
      Booms were just a part of every day life.😂
      At least I got the opportunity to ride in Fat Albert and a simulated JATO launch. 🎉

    • @horstupsupsups7488
      @horstupsupsups7488 7 місяців тому

      The noisemakers continued to fall from the sky until they were decommissioned in 1991, costing a total of 116 pilots their lives. Of the 916 F-104Fs procured, a total of 269 aircraft crashed

  • @ManjuSingh-io6ix
    @ManjuSingh-io6ix 7 годин тому

    What a beauty sleek and super fast 👍

  • @KenSmith-bv4si
    @KenSmith-bv4si 10 місяців тому +7

    Back in 1976 I was a Phantom Phixer while stationed at Kadena AFB, me and half the squadron were air lifted to Kunsan AFB after two Army officers were killed on the DMZ. After 30 days on high alert one of the Phantom pilots decided to pop the sound barrier right over the Flight line before landing, he broke the base commanders office windows, and was sent home to Okinawa.

    • @s.daniel9224
      @s.daniel9224 10 місяців тому

      Eagle keeper here. 91-96

    • @KenSmith-bv4si
      @KenSmith-bv4si 10 місяців тому

      @@s.daniel9224 I got to see the "Streak Eagle" along with a Fighting Falcon plus a Warthog, way back in 1977 while stationed @ Kadena.

    • @johnperreault116
      @johnperreault116 7 місяців тому

      i was at Kadena 76-79

    • @KenSmith-bv4si
      @KenSmith-bv4si 7 місяців тому

      @@johnperreault116 What did you do for 3yrs on the Rock?

    • @johnperreault116
      @johnperreault116 7 місяців тому

      12TFS weapons loading@@KenSmith-bv4si

  • @user-hl9jf6vq2n
    @user-hl9jf6vq2n 11 місяців тому +4

    Современные радары отслеживают самолёты не по звуку.
    Эт для тех,кто в абрамсе.

    • @four-dimensionalperson
      @four-dimensionalperson 10 місяців тому

      Это пассажирский самолёт в масштабе , причём тут радары , бомбить Россию будут совсем другие .

  • @donadams8345
    @donadams8345 Рік тому +6

    People have become supersensitive to aircraft sound. I'm pretty old now and I can remember the days of sonic booms from the air force. We just accepted them and went about our business, no big deal. Now they build housing developments near airports and the people that move into them then complain about the aircraft noise. Doesn't make sense, does it. Supersonic mass transit doesn't make much sense either, the extra energy needed to move at those speeds doesn't make sense in terms of fuel usage and likely never will. The safety aspect will be a problem also. It makes more sense to move slower, use less fuel and enjoy the ride.

  • @dischargedarrowgetback4322
    @dischargedarrowgetback4322 8 місяців тому +3

    A beautiful aircraft reminiscent of the strategic bomber XB-70.
    The Xb-70's engine was also made by General Electric.

  • @jan_phd
    @jan_phd 11 місяців тому +4

    Reminds me of the X-3 Stiletto by Douglas.

  • @user-hs3gk4wq2x
    @user-hs3gk4wq2x 9 місяців тому +1

    I saw this fly over the pier in Huntington beach California. it went from 500 feet over the water to over 30,000 feet and around a passenger jet then disappeared behind the mountains in all of 7 seconds and less!

  • @user-bv1gb5fi7x
    @user-bv1gb5fi7x 10 місяців тому +2

    I remember when I was a kid we used to always hear Sonic booms in the sky it was not nothing unusual at all you wouldn't even hardly flinched that we've had so many of them

    • @douglasdavis8395
      @douglasdavis8395 10 місяців тому +2

      Those were from the most beautiful B-58 Hustlers!

    • @user-bv1gb5fi7x
      @user-bv1gb5fi7x 10 місяців тому +2

      @@douglasdavis8395 I literally lived right in the hub Beal, McClellan, Mather, and Travis Air Force basis.. so we had them quite a bit in the early 60s

  • @southpark4151
    @southpark4151 Рік тому +8

    "Finally! America Tests Its Insane New Supersonic Jet" - there's a big difference between 'tests' and 'is going to test'.

  • @namelesswarrior4760
    @namelesswarrior4760 Рік тому +5

    So, if all goes well. It should be in service in about 2 decades? Awesome. keep up the good work. Oh, how many billions just to build 1 again?

    • @AmericanTacticalFighter
      @AmericanTacticalFighter  Рік тому

      @@namelesswarrior4760 Here's America's New Supersonic transport may hold a promise of super-fast travel The World Has Been Waiting For

    • @namelesswarrior4760
      @namelesswarrior4760 Рік тому +1

      @@AmericanTacticalFighter the world may learn to love the US again if/when the US leave the world alone to grow in peace without being forced to adapt a set of western values that does not fit their cultures.

  • @Watchmedome3017
    @Watchmedome3017 7 місяців тому +1

    The concord doesn’t look to far away from the x59 looking at it. Maybe a few redesigns might help it specially with new engine technologies we have now.

  • @garrettburrows442
    @garrettburrows442 10 місяців тому +2

    Some people dont understand how a sonic boom works, it's not just a boom, the boom is continues as a wave, the ironic part about secret aircraft is the designated project name usually correlates with what the project does. Project Aurora leaves an aurora, project thumper thumps

  • @clarencehopkins7832
    @clarencehopkins7832 2 місяці тому

    Excellent stuff bro

  • @baileyreport.
    @baileyreport. 10 місяців тому +5

    Yeager was the link between the fighter pilot and the astronaut. No college degree, but blessed with perfect 20/10 vision and aeronautical skills you don't get with a college degree. He was asked if he regretted not going into space because of his lack of college training. He told them he didn't need a degree to push many buttons. Typical Yearger all the way.

    • @chazmann108
      @chazmann108 8 місяців тому +1

      He cheated on his cancer ridden, dying wife and was strongly disliked by many military aviators throughout his career. He WAS insecure over not going to college and this was evident in his interactions with many colleagues. He's been lionized for being first to go supersonic, but did some terrible things to other people/pilots and in his final years was cut off from his biological children with Glennis. He should have hired a nurse to take care of him as he aged, but chose to marry someone who now owns the 'legacy'. For verbal confirmation of this, listen to Bill Anders in 'First Moon' describe when he applied to and was accepted to the astronaut program DESPITE Yeager's spitefulness.

  • @j.mdeespana.1378
    @j.mdeespana.1378 10 місяців тому +1

    Beautifiull

  • @NATES84
    @NATES84 Рік тому +9

    Concorde was NOT banned from flight over land but supersonic flight over land ,very different.

    • @truthadvocacy
      @truthadvocacy Рік тому +1

      over land subsonic flight doesn't make sense for a supersonic airliner.

    • @brynleytalbot778
      @brynleytalbot778 10 місяців тому +4

      Concorde’s fuel consumption and its cost of maintenance meant it was never extended beyond its operating lifetime. If I recall correctly the venture was never profitable. Those were the reasons it was cancelled, not the supersonic boom. In the UK such a boom was over the ocean given it’s an island. The supersonic flight occurred at a high ceiling. It wasn’t a fighter jet.

    • @johnetherington6819
      @johnetherington6819 10 місяців тому +2

      Let's get real.
      1. Concorde for the time was well designed and a technical success, accommodation excepted.
      2. Concorde not a Boeing product (like the Russians they could not do it at the time) failed due to USA restrictions.
      3. The unfortunate accident caused by poor repairs to another parties aircraft was used as an excuse to remove Concorde from service.
      4. Accommodation was poor for a long haul aircraft,, 100 seats were a squeeze, From the passenger side given the fares 60 to 70 seats would have been better.

    • @John-nc4bl
      @John-nc4bl 10 місяців тому

      The Russian SST beat the concord to flight and was a bigger aircraft.@@johnetherington6819

  • @garystone3476
    @garystone3476 Рік тому +2

    It's not practical for commercial flight. The reason why Concorde isn't around today is that such supersonic aircraft are too expensive to fly and maintain.

    • @brynleytalbot778
      @brynleytalbot778 10 місяців тому +1

      Finally the right answer. Fuel costs and maintenance. Congratulations. So much nonsense in this video, and the comments, about Concorde’s demise.

    • @John-nc4bl
      @John-nc4bl 10 місяців тому

      The Brits were very poor at marketing their aircraft and many of their aircraft were only produced in very small numbers.@@brynleytalbot778

  • @anndivine9989
    @anndivine9989 Рік тому +25

    It doesn't matter even if it is louder than Concord. It will he acceptable, why, because it's American, not British. That was the real reason that Concord was slowed down over land. not that it was complained about, but because the US didn't have a S/sonic plane.

    • @Timbothruster-fh3cw
      @Timbothruster-fh3cw 11 місяців тому +4

      Then why doesn't it still fly in Britain?

    • @billreid9021
      @billreid9021 11 місяців тому

      Simply put tim the transatlantic route was THE big money spinner - no route no money SIMPLE @@Timbothruster-fh3cw

    • @MrMetalzeb
      @MrMetalzeb 11 місяців тому

      @@Timbothruster-fh3cw it's obviously usefull for long distance trips.

    • @Timbothruster-fh3cw
      @Timbothruster-fh3cw 11 місяців тому +1

      @@MrMetalzeb What does that have to do with what I said?

    • @MrMetalzeb
      @MrMetalzeb 11 місяців тому +1

      I said that a Concorde would be useless for short routes such as national ones, and since a flight within GB would be domestic => it would be useless. Here is "why doesn't it still fly in Britain". is it clear now?

  • @jaymac7203
    @jaymac7203 11 місяців тому +6

    Concorde is still one of the best looking aircraft ever made!

    • @John-nc4bl
      @John-nc4bl 10 місяців тому +1

      Naw,
      The SR-71 and the XB-70 beat the concorde by a long shot.

  • @hoplites6252
    @hoplites6252 9 місяців тому +2

    Interesting but the narrator needs help. Mack is a truck, Mach is the speed of sound. One animated scene shows a compressor blades in the scramjet engine.

  • @DanielWilliams-iz5ub
    @DanielWilliams-iz5ub 10 місяців тому

    As a kid growing up near a radar testing base hearing the sonic boom and trying to see the plane before it went out sight. We also would bunches of foil they used to test the base a different age now

  • @TheSupeRUguy
    @TheSupeRUguy 10 місяців тому +1

    The main thing is that his nose does not fall off. And the pilot needs to be careful so as not to end up on the moon))

  • @maxmartin7080
    @maxmartin7080 10 місяців тому

    Concorde, in my opinion was the most beautiful commercial aircraft ever built, even to this day! Lockheed SR-72 the most beautiful military aircraft.

  • @Paul-ey1ct
    @Paul-ey1ct 7 місяців тому

    Mr Tracey...... Thunder birds are GO👍 That's lady Penelope,s aircraft in a episode of thunder birds when she visits Tracey island 🏝️, also I've see something like it on captain scarlet, all the things Gerry Anderson made as futuristic models are now a fact👍, well done Brain's 😂 also I think it's in UFO as well.

  • @randycrager4074
    @randycrager4074 10 місяців тому +1

    When is the last time NASA themself has done anything right? I can't remember!

  • @user-sb2gk6uh2v
    @user-sb2gk6uh2v 11 місяців тому +3

    Сверхзвук надо применять на больших высотах,а эту констр.можно сделать более функциональной иу😢 с верт.взлетом и устранить высокий звук у Знмли.МВП-Владимер.

    • @user-cg6jo1ig5f
      @user-cg6jo1ig5f 10 місяців тому +1

      Да хоть что пусть делают ,банка с крыльями. Гореть знатно будет

    • @VITTchanel
      @VITTchanel 10 місяців тому +1

      @@djuda88 а чоу вас из вооружения то супер нового и классного? :) Абрамс? Бредли? F-35? :) У нас армата- воюет, су 57 воюет, осторожно, но всеж..

  • @CaptJerry
    @CaptJerry 10 місяців тому

    I'm sure it's boooom will be at the same volume, will wait n see

  • @carbonfibercreationswashin7213
    @carbonfibercreationswashin7213 10 місяців тому

    I grew up in Arizona and I can truthfully tell you the air force broke the sound barrier over Phoenix often. Who the hell cares it's just a sound and we all knew it's just a military jet

  • @haytguugle8656
    @haytguugle8656 Рік тому +1

    "dayboo"? "mack"? "NAYSUH"? "Yeeger"?

    • @CarlMadsen
      @CarlMadsen 4 місяці тому

      computer generated voice. Horrid.

  • @GauntletKI
    @GauntletKI Рік тому +2

    Good for fighter jets. Too often military boom is not allowed.

    • @Make-Asylums-Great-Again
      @Make-Asylums-Great-Again 10 місяців тому

      This isn’t a fighter jet, notice the ridiculous long design, wouldn’t help in air combat. This is more for the civilian side of aviation.

    • @GauntletKI
      @GauntletKI 10 місяців тому

      @@Make-Asylums-Great-Again there have been such before

  • @SofiaH797
    @SofiaH797 Рік тому +4

    Muy buen Video, me complace compartir con ustedes un Genio que ha ayudado en mi vida que es la Sra. Eve P. Wood, he estado ganando casi $30,000 en mi inversión de $6,000 cada semana, Dios bendiga a la Sra. Eve P. Wood y todo gracias a mi amiga por presentármela

    • @mateodavid977
      @mateodavid977 Рік тому

      También invierto con la Sra. Eve P. Wood invirtiendo mi capital en la cartera comercial que ella creó para mí. He estado obteniendo buenas ganancias a través de sus servicios. Ella es una corredora registrada y también está registrada en Internet y tiene experiencia en el comercio de criptomonedas.

    • @SofiaH797
      @SofiaH797 Рік тому

      ella está disponible en whatsapp 🇺🇸🇺🇸👇👇

    • @SofiaH797
      @SofiaH797 Рік тому

      🇺🇸十𝟏𝟖𝟎𝟑𝟓𝟖𝟔𝟏𝟎𝟒𝟖👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾✴️✴️✴️

    • @SofiaH797
      @SofiaH797 Рік тому

      ella está disponible en whatsapp 🇺🇸🇺🇸👇👇

    • @SofiaH797
      @SofiaH797 Рік тому

      🇺🇸十𝟏𝟖𝟎𝟑𝟓𝟖𝟔𝟏𝟎𝟒𝟖👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾✴️✴️✴️

  • @user-ud4vi5wv1b
    @user-ud4vi5wv1b 11 місяців тому +1

    ❤❤❤😊

  • @iansampson2492
    @iansampson2492 Рік тому +1

    I suppose dusting off the Valkyrie next....

  • @eduardjacob8710
    @eduardjacob8710 11 місяців тому +1

    NASA Hollywood 😂

  • @billstream1974
    @billstream1974 11 місяців тому +3

    Always love concept aircraft.

  • @opieshomeshop
    @opieshomeshop 10 місяців тому

    *_Cool remote control toy available in hobby stores._*

  • @andyman8630
    @andyman8630 Рік тому +2

    looks like something out of the 80's

  • @Guds777
    @Guds777 10 місяців тому

    Supersonic sound pollution and lack of speed has never been the problem, the cost of flying fast has always been the problem. Most airplanes fly a lot slower than what they can do, to save on fuel...

    • @brynleytalbot778
      @brynleytalbot778 10 місяців тому

      Go to the top of the class, above the multitude of dunces commenting here, and the nonsense about Concorde in this video.

  • @fppro1679
    @fppro1679 Рік тому +11

    Travel from door to door is made so much longer simply by the process of getting to the airport and on the plane that I don't think taking a 3-hour trip down to one saves that much time.

    • @user-td3du7jk2x
      @user-td3du7jk2x 10 місяців тому

      Also, the amount of the ticket for the planes originally, made it less worth it as well.

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 11 місяців тому

    Its so powerful realy I like it

  • @user-wc6lh2nv7y
    @user-wc6lh2nv7y 10 місяців тому

    это буратиборг (и музыка из "Буратино": "парам тарам пам пам, парам тарам пам пам, ту ру ру ру ру ру ру ру....") :)))))

  • @mjb12141963
    @mjb12141963 Рік тому +5

    I lived in the flight path of the Air Force or who else, I don't know, but nearly everyday in the summer there were sonic booms. Usually about the time Bugs Bunny was on. Or years later when you are sunning because you didn't want to be the only really white Californian kid. They get under your skin and make you crazy. No, there's nothing wrong with that sound.

    • @AmericanTacticalFighter
      @AmericanTacticalFighter  Рік тому +1

      @@mjb12141963 The X-59 supersonic jet is expected to produce only a gentle thump, or the equivalent of a nearby car door slamming, for people on the ground. In comparison, previous generations of supersonic aircraft are known to rattle windows when flying over the speed of sound.

    • @AmericanTacticalFighter
      @AmericanTacticalFighter  Рік тому

      @@mjb12141963 The sonic boom was one of the reasons for the Concorde’s downfall. The passenger supersonic was withdrawn from service in 2003 and could travel at Mach 2.04 (2,179 km/h).
      However, flying at that speed over inhabited centers, even at high altitudes, generates a great environmental and even destructive impact, with the potential to shatter glass windows with the force of the shock waves created by the object flying at a speed greater than that of the sound.
      If NASA succeeds in solving the charade of silent supersonic flight (or with a noise level that is not harmful), aircraft with this capability could be used on more routes and make the high-speed aviation market viable.

    • @truthadvocacy
      @truthadvocacy Рік тому +2

      "sunning because you didn't want to be the only really white Californian kid. " tanning doesn't make one non-white.😁😁

    • @ShavkatSayitov
      @ShavkatSayitov 10 місяців тому

      ​@@AmericanTacticalFighterздравствуйте уважаемые уминя есть квам предложение по стратегический изобратения ПВО каторий найдет всё и сразу же уничтожить даже если силний ветрех

    • @ShavkatSayitov
      @ShavkatSayitov 10 місяців тому

      ​@@AmericanTacticalFighterуминя есть стратегический изобратения против минний Дронов ПВО

  • @decler-gt7nu
    @decler-gt7nu 10 місяців тому

    That would of bèen a monumental moment at the time ,the beginning of the supersonic eara, well done Chuck and all involved, personally I don't believe we will ever go back to supersonic passenger jets ,the risks are to high for the stress on the aircraft and the danger to human life

  • @printer1105
    @printer1105 11 місяців тому +3

    What is new is the testing over American cities to effect real world microphone results. This is critical for moving forward with this tech.

  • @claudethibaudeau2714
    @claudethibaudeau2714 11 місяців тому +3

    Impressive plane 🇨🇦

  • @alexandrdydykin2268
    @alexandrdydykin2268 10 місяців тому

    Российские разработки 90х годов! Прошлый век уже! Хорошо вы нас пограбили! Вот и останетесь со всем этим ещё лет на 50.

  • @Koolarrow1987
    @Koolarrow1987 7 місяців тому

    The south wind head North is a great way to solve if this plane should ever fly again if a unmanned craft can be tested over the old bomb blast test sites north of the 37 region of Texas starting

  • @drewlovelyhell4892
    @drewlovelyhell4892 10 місяців тому +2

    Wait a minute, the Air Force was only established in 1947? Then what service did the bombers and fighters belong to in WWII?
    Edit: I looked it up.
    The U S Army Air Force was formed in 1907, but was only made an independent branch in 1947.

  • @ramiromarte340
    @ramiromarte340 11 місяців тому +1

    Muy bien por usa 🇺🇸 ahora mismo más fuerte que nunca solo Dios los para es los mejor k te puede pasar arriba los Estados Unidos de de America

  • @jons7771
    @jons7771 11 місяців тому

    The rumblings over Michigan and Pennsylvania? This is the culprit. Test flights last week.

  • @mematmevt5164
    @mematmevt5164 Рік тому +1

    ❤❤❤

  • @daciamcv1026
    @daciamcv1026 10 місяців тому

    I do not fly anymore I take the train ,most times the door to door times are shorter and it is more comfortable .Mind you I do live in Europe

  • @jasonbose3507
    @jasonbose3507 11 місяців тому +3

    It needs to go as fast or faster than the ancient technology, the Concorde. Thanks 👍. ps/ the speed seems slow, just sayin.

    • @todddooley793
      @todddooley793 10 місяців тому

      Seem slow to me also, 900mph+?? They were going twice that 60 years ago.

  • @snotnosewilly99
    @snotnosewilly99 11 місяців тому +5

    The problem the SSTs is not only the sonic boom, but also the vast amounts of fuel they burn per passenger. Environmentalists would go crazy with protests.

  • @vantuantran7844
    @vantuantran7844 11 місяців тому +1

    Nga, tàu 100 năm nữa chưa Theo kịp Mỹ

  • @jakerazmataz852
    @jakerazmataz852 10 місяців тому

    If it's as quiet as they say, they shouldn't tell anyone and wait to see if they get any calls. Then have the authorities ask the callers questions.

  • @dondamon443
    @dondamon443 10 місяців тому

    Honestly, I don't think this aircraft will get beyond experimental. Put the engine in something that a pilot can demonstrate without interference of vision or agility.

  • @pinasako6710
    @pinasako6710 11 місяців тому +1

    Wow

  • @travelvidscom
    @travelvidscom 9 місяців тому +1

    Call it The Dart

  • @user-lr8db3st8s
    @user-lr8db3st8s 10 місяців тому

    Америка деньги есть, специалисты со всего мира - поэтому и самые передовые технологии.

    • @TheTurboraptor
      @TheTurboraptor 10 місяців тому

      Ключевое деньги, главное как на карман сработать вот и исполняют всякие летающие шампура для отмывки. По сути этот пепелац опсолютное дерьмо не имеющее возможности маневра.

  • @Dlweta57
    @Dlweta57 5 місяців тому

    So this x vehicle has actually flied????? If not when... Eagerly waiting for real footage

  • @glynluff2595
    @glynluff2595 10 місяців тому +1

    So this would allow intelligence missions with less obvious intrusion. Passenger and freight design would probably be too expensive looking at wing to body ratio. There is also the politics of commercial flight. With this style of wing if successful the intelligence plane could possibly dip in and out of edge of space flight without notifying areas below of immediate presence if not already electronically detected. In time to come the electrical power for a commercial plane to achieve such flight would probably be too high therefore it becomes military and only an intelligence plane could justify such expense.

  • @SkinPeeleR
    @SkinPeeleR 10 місяців тому

    Ancient technology.

  • @edgardminkilane-ol7fi
    @edgardminkilane-ol7fi 9 місяців тому

    Cool

  • @franjato1
    @franjato1 11 місяців тому +3

    Parece um avião saído direto de um filme de Gerry Anderson.

  • @user-mv3lq2rs6x
    @user-mv3lq2rs6x 10 місяців тому

    Как же так сша считает себя самой продвинутой страной в авиации но конкорд и ту144 40 лет назад летали а сша только начали делать сверхзвуковой пассажирский самолет

  • @danyel6156
    @danyel6156 10 місяців тому

    Could this needle be used for sewing or knitting?

  • @user-to7fc8ph3v
    @user-to7fc8ph3v 11 місяців тому +1

    اشو ها المنظر شي غير طبيعي

  • @user-zx3ci9ii2b
    @user-zx3ci9ii2b 7 місяців тому

    NASA said it will fly this plane over cities to show how quiet it is.
    So I would like to ask NASA not to fly this thing over my city. The rockets launched by the NAS that explode in the air and the doors of Boeing planes that come off mid-air and fall into people's backyards are enough.
    Thank you very much...

  • @andyga5719
    @andyga5719 11 місяців тому +1

    Очередной макет из сериала 😂😂😂.

  • @seigi11
    @seigi11 7 місяців тому +1

    920 miles/hour supersonic aircraft?

  • @John-nc4bl
    @John-nc4bl 10 місяців тому

    The small island nation of Britain does not have the advantage like America has with metallurgy technology filtering down from NASA and the space program.

  • @ilovetoysto1
    @ilovetoysto1 6 місяців тому

    How fast do you think it really goes ?? They said top speed for SR71 was mach 3.3. Not .My turbine engine teacher at AP school work on this the SR 71 in military said it goes mach 7 Thats why takes hour to cool down after flight . front of aircraft gets very hot do to fast speed

  • @pavelluk
    @pavelluk 10 місяців тому

    The landing gear looks like from F-16 line.

  • @Franck121169
    @Franck121169 11 місяців тому

    il me fait penser à l'avion "Espadon" de la BD Black et Mortimer

  • @MEGASEB83
    @MEGASEB83 11 місяців тому

    It looks like the Espadon fron the comic Blake et Mortimer.

  • @donquijote7463
    @donquijote7463 Рік тому

    CESSNA: HOLD MY BEER.

  • @dcarey5480
    @dcarey5480 Рік тому +1

    Dam ther sure are some very smart people building theas amazing aircrafts

  • @samsmak
    @samsmak 7 місяців тому

    "Nay Saw"; "Make 1"; "Deb-butte flight". The A.I. voice over needs a "Re-butt".

  • @user-xd9wc9mj8b
    @user-xd9wc9mj8b 7 місяців тому

    往年のTVドラマ「サンダーバード」や「ジョー90」に登場する機体を彷彿させるデザイン。現実が空想にやっと追いついたか。

  • @Gonner453
    @Gonner453 Місяць тому

    I’m sorry to say this, but it will never happen. People already complained too much about airplanes like building housing development, either at the beginning of the runway or near the end of the runway. Let’s also be honest they have changed the way or help building materials are done since the Concorde but do you really think that something like a faster than the speed of sound plane will be allowed by anybody right now most people in some communities have a hard time dealing with people because they want a fence put up. But who knows we may see this in another 10 to 20 years

  • @user-wk2fe7bf5k
    @user-wk2fe7bf5k 10 місяців тому +1

    Летающий утюг с нулевой манёвренностью.

    • @user-wc6lh2nv7y
      @user-wc6lh2nv7y 10 місяців тому

      это буратиборг (и музыка из "Буратино": "парам тарам пам пам, парам тарам пам пам, ту ру ру ру ру ру ру ру....") :)))))

  • @Markov_727
    @Markov_727 7 місяців тому

    That's too many countries from Argentina to Canada that conforms America where is that at?

  • @nicomeier8098
    @nicomeier8098 10 місяців тому +1

    66 Decibel is nothing.

  • @tubetaz
    @tubetaz 7 місяців тому

    I think they got inspiration from a Duck-billed Platypus for the nose. :)

  • @generationsgengenerationsg9775
    @generationsgengenerationsg9775 7 місяців тому

    Поляки купят его даже если он не взлетит !! 😜

  • @Koolarrow1987
    @Koolarrow1987 7 місяців тому

    For Corpus Christi TX to San Antonio

  • @davidn.331
    @davidn.331 10 місяців тому

    Why are we spending millions on a limited occupancy jet? Especially if we are to have only EV's.

  • @Luiz-vo8yn
    @Luiz-vo8yn 10 місяців тому

    Some laws of physics should be remembered only as past and should be left behind. We need to bury our physical laws even though they have had a lot of importance in the present. Either we intelligently reprogram ourselves, or we will remain centuries in our absolute and changing truths. We need to doubt everything that is taught, because seeing it from other angles can lead us to see laws of physics that we cannot see due to our current knowledge. We have already lost 4.5 billion years in our scientific slowness and in just 200 years of the Industrial Revolution we woke up and rose up in progress. Now it's time to say goodbye to everything we've learned, everything that made us proud and everything that made us static in our progress. We need a funeral of everything we know, look up at the sky and see a new era, which has always been there invitingly waiting for us, and without crying and tears and without celebration, we understand that scientific truths and laws were just steps of learning. ...Learning that never ends and this is very healthy, it stimulates us, it is our fuel and the Engineer of Life certainly has our growth as the maturation of a tomorrow, whose road has never been and will never be static and fills us with curiosity and of questions in the construction of a tomorrow that never stops discoveries and challenges... It's a good thing we don't know everything because otherwise we would lose the fuel of the need to seek more and more science...

  • @gscott5778
    @gscott5778 10 місяців тому

    Commercial Supersonic Airliners are unlikely to enter the market again except for the super rich. The design shown here, scaled up will still be a low capacity plane with a high cost and high operational costs so don't get your hopes up unless you are willing to pay $5-$10 thousand per flight

  • @peterpv592
    @peterpv592 11 місяців тому

    looks like a jazzed up handley page HP115

  • @norbertzukiewicz3833
    @norbertzukiewicz3833 9 місяців тому +1

    Trzeba być pozbawionym duszy żeby się cieszyć z broni która morduje ludzi popaprańcy nie zastanawialiście się czemu są wojny debile żeby te bronie wypróbować na głupich ludziach

  • @magaman6353
    @magaman6353 Рік тому

    Nice, but how are they going to get any passengers into the skinny pencil of a plane?

  • @christopherpuls651
    @christopherpuls651 11 місяців тому

    Hi , !:) If it got a inside frame made of metall , perhaps high stability static too , able use a funnel for stream arround tunnel . The jet got a antenna in front and so in it able burn away :) USA You know which material , cause used in old times .
    But there was the fuel with burn waight and inside the O2 holdet too ;) Muskies Jetrocketgel fuel not for long time before good too .
    I dont know what name on the fuel like that used in F14 bring away ;)