Had very mixed results with this tool, it needs a lot of work to be used by an architect meaningfully I think. Given theyre using an algo out of their hands (stable diffusion?) I doubt it will develop to that point, but has shown the market what people want maybe. My thinking is this will be like the design wizard in powerpoint, offering snapshots of options to choose from versus doing 1 image from a targeted prompt, and drawing off mood boards and finishes specs. My attention is still very much planted on gamification versus AI for 3D currently. Bigger waves being made there for now at least.
Both development directions can coexist. Gamification is really interesting both from business as well as academia standpoint. As for this particular tool - I don't think AI renders should be shown to clients as they are "dishonest" in their representation. BUT they can definitely be used at super early design development stages to investigate a variety of aesthetic/design directions that otherwise would have been skipped due to time constraints.
Easy. Rhino good for things that will be built, Blender good for things that will not be built. Vray for Rhino is weaker than Cycles for Blender. Vray for 3ds Max is stronger than Cycles for Blender.
oh wow. How does it cope with complex geometries ? have you tried importing grasshopper models into revit ? ( thanks for the concise presentation, shared with colleagues !)
Hey, love your videos they're extremely insightful! I was wondering when you go back to modelling walls could you show us how you'd produce the back wall from the first image of 'the off the grid office by engraff'? Thanks!
@@DesignGoBrr How did you get the contour lines, did you use Google Earth?? I have a school project and I need to make a 3d model for part of the grand canyon
Turn down the creativity strength slider and the building it will be closer to the actual Revit model, not so wild. With the creativity slider up it takes liberties. The Japanese interior does look good.
@@DesignGoBrr My approach is economic on this subject, i think AI can be a tool for some artist/architects (especially for people who are both). but as a pessimist, i see 2 things : - 3d become more and more easy through the years (and that's cool), now we can produce more and faster. We are at a point where anyone can learn and produce 3d models, textures and renders (except if you didn't delete the default cube). Ia will improve this again. - Ai is faster again and cheaper. Many artist works for a low wage and can't accept a lower remuneration if they want to pay the bills. AI don't have this type of considerations. For a company, it's much more interesting to subscribe to an ai software. Where we are 5 3d artist who produce each one project in 3 days, "ai" can produce much more just with one specialist who will write the right "prompt". Market will change, "ai" will be an amazing tool for a few artists... others must choose another way.
@@spartan22550 Yes and No. Like CNC machines for carpenters. Those who try to make as many chairs as possible - HAD to learn how to use CNC or else they were pushed out by others. Those who would work on a chair for a year and then sell it for a year's worth of salary - had the opportunity to choose if they want to incorporate CNC machines in their workflow. Or even better - pencil+paper architects when AutoCAD came in the 80's.
@@DesignGoBrr CNC example is interesting because it's an analogy for automation, from the 19th century, energy and technology grew up fast and became the main tool for industries and farming. For example, mid 1900s we had around 70 % of farmer in french population. Now we have around 2 % of farmer because of technologic progress (tractors, machinery) and the aviability of energy (petrol and charbon mainly). And now, the world move faster, really faster. Economic history is a cycle, we are front a new revolutionary technology, it will create new jobs (professor for ai, maybe) but the probability of see disappear some others is high. Honestly when i see what predictive algorithm can do in comparison of what i can do... i must admit it, ia is better, faster and cheaper. I started to implement it on my workflow and faslty understood anyone can do this... an AI also... Maybe we're living the last years of our passion as a job. Maybe Asmiov was right about robots.
-Implying that you only use rendering at the final stage of the project and not during initial planning of the aesthetic direction. I agree - these renders should never be shown to clients, because they are quite dishonest (you'd have so much fun trying to replicate the same "feel" during the construction dev phase) , but for sure they enhance the decision making process of "where am I taking this design in terms of aesthetics?"
Not necessarily. It will be sad only if artists/designers loose control by not keeping up with the development of these tools. If this becomes yet another tool under the belt of an architect, then I'm optimistic.
@@clarkkent5830 think 2 steps deeper about this. What kind of rendering? What are the qualities of said workflow? Drawbacks? What constitutes as "good rendering" ?.. Come on. Putting just a bit extra thought into any topic pushes you out of the "it's either black or white" territory
@@DesignGoBrr Apparently I'm thinking beyond 2 steps deeper. If this AI can create a rendering that's pretty good in a few seconds right now what do you think it will be able to do in a few years? Don't think for a minute that Architects & Designers won't jump at the chance to replace an expensive employee with a cheep AI. This has been coming for a long time and I'm not happy to see it but the march of the machine is going to take a lot of peoples jobs in the coming years.
![We tried to compete with AI... [AI vs. ARCHITECT]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/N709ZrxoIP0/mqdefault.jpg)
OH MY GOD This is next generation of architecture
Don't be too dramatic :D
it's not
Had very mixed results with this tool, it needs a lot of work to be used by an architect meaningfully I think. Given theyre using an algo out of their hands (stable diffusion?) I doubt it will develop to that point, but has shown the market what people want maybe.
My thinking is this will be like the design wizard in powerpoint, offering snapshots of options to choose from versus doing 1 image from a targeted prompt, and drawing off mood boards and finishes specs.
My attention is still very much planted on gamification versus AI for 3D currently. Bigger waves being made there for now at least.
Both development directions can coexist. Gamification is really interesting both from business as well as academia standpoint. As for this particular tool - I don't think AI renders should be shown to clients as they are "dishonest" in their representation. BUT they can definitely be used at super early design development stages to investigate a variety of aesthetic/design directions that otherwise would have been skipped due to time constraints.
Sir, would love to hear your thoughts on
Rhino vs Blender for modelling
V-ray vs Cycles for rendering
Easy. Rhino good for things that will be built, Blender good for things that will not be built. Vray for Rhino is weaker than Cycles for Blender. Vray for 3ds Max is stronger than Cycles for Blender.
@@DesignGoBrr what about enscape in revit?
Wow, they dont need us visualizers soon anymore :(
Awesome work! Would be also great to see a video about possible workflows between Rhino and Archicad, and how they can work together
But.. I don't use Archicad.... That would be a very awkward tutorial.
@@DesignGoBrr :D If anything that makes me want it more lol. Thanks anyway!
@@ben3000 why archicad and not something more progressive and industry standard like Revit?
oh wow. How does it cope with complex geometries ? have you tried importing grasshopper models into revit ? ( thanks for the concise presentation, shared with colleagues !)
Yep, check out the second channel video in the description, where I try to break it with more complex stuff!
This looks a hell of a lot like a Stable Diffusion fork with a depth pass.
That's all it took to make it usable
Thanks for the video, AI will be game changing in the industry!
In every industry. Not yet though, but in our lifetimes for sure!
it's a really really insane add-in~😱 it'll must be our future!
I'm excited!
You can do this inside blender with the stability fusion addon
K
May I ask what the difference is with veras and other tools like midjourney? What are the benefits over other AI tools?
UI convenience mostly. Having everything in one place is actually quite valuable (for a seamless workflow)
Damn bro, this is epic!
I know, right?!
Hey, love your videos they're extremely insightful! I was wondering when you go back to modelling walls could you show us how you'd produce the back wall from the first image of 'the off the grid office by engraff'?
Thanks!
Sure I'll record a video about it~
@@DesignGoBrr Thank you!
Is there anything similar for rhino or illustrator?
Yup, Veras also works on Rhino now. There's also ArkoAI that works on Rhino.
@@DesignGoBrr thank you!
Can you make a video on technical section diagrams for architecture please?
Can you make a video teaching us how to make terrain models in rhino 7?
Do you mean landscape design? ua-cam.com/video/fdebXiQbTf0/v-deo.html
@@DesignGoBrr How did you get the contour lines, did you use Google Earth?? I have a school project and I need to make a 3d model for part of the grand canyon
For rhino ..when????
My guess would be "soon-ish"
Turn down the creativity strength slider and the building it will be closer to the actual Revit model, not so wild. With the creativity slider up it takes liberties. The Japanese interior does look good.
Yep, figured that one out in the second video (link in the description). An important slider to dial in
I tried it and it kept giving me pretty random interpretations of that villa, not even close to the original.
Reduce the creativity slider
only working for Revit？ How about 3D Max？😢
Yea, but I'm sure clones of this will pop up for every software package
@@DesignGoBrr I have never looked forward to a rendering software so much. Hope to run on more platforms.
Will this plugin run on revit cracked version?
*eyeroll*
T was good to know y’all
Don't loose hope!
Is it free?
Holy moly😬😬😬
It's pretty cool isn't it?!
@@DesignGoBrr sort of promising, real time-saver
first AI will take all our jobs, then there will be no clients anymore.. what the fuck's gonna happen? i wonder
AI will not take our jobs, architects who'll know how to use AI will.
oh god... i'm useless, archviz artists are the past.
I disagree. Just another tool FOR archviz artists
@@DesignGoBrr My approach is economic on this subject, i think AI can be a tool for some artist/architects (especially for people who are both).
but as a pessimist, i see 2 things :
- 3d become more and more easy through the years (and that's cool), now we can produce more and faster. We are at a point where anyone can learn and produce 3d models, textures and renders (except if you didn't delete the default cube). Ia will improve this again.
- Ai is faster again and cheaper. Many artist works for a low wage and can't accept a lower remuneration if they want to pay the bills. AI don't have this type of considerations.
For a company, it's much more interesting to subscribe to an ai software. Where we are 5 3d artist who produce each one project in 3 days, "ai" can produce much more just with one specialist who will write the right "prompt".
Market will change, "ai" will be an amazing tool for a few artists... others must choose another way.
@@spartan22550 Yes and No. Like CNC machines for carpenters. Those who try to make as many chairs as possible - HAD to learn how to use CNC or else they were pushed out by others. Those who would work on a chair for a year and then sell it for a year's worth of salary - had the opportunity to choose if they want to incorporate CNC machines in their workflow. Or even better - pencil+paper architects when AutoCAD came in the 80's.
@@DesignGoBrr CNC example is interesting because it's an analogy for automation, from the 19th century, energy and technology grew up fast and became the main tool for industries and farming.
For example, mid 1900s we had around 70 % of farmer in french population. Now we have around 2 % of farmer because of technologic progress (tractors, machinery) and the aviability of energy (petrol and charbon mainly).
And now, the world move faster, really faster. Economic history is a cycle, we are front a new revolutionary technology, it will create new jobs (professor for ai, maybe) but the probability of see disappear some others is high. Honestly when i see what predictive algorithm can do in comparison of what i can do... i must admit it, ia is better, faster and cheaper. I started to implement it on my workflow and faslty understood anyone can do this... an AI also...
Maybe we're living the last years of our passion as a job. Maybe Asmiov was right about robots.
@@spartan22550 Even though Asimov is great - I prefer how Mamoru Oshii portrayed the dynamics between us and technology.
on 99% of the buildings made by me, when I use a filter, it creates random garbage that does not even fit in shape
Make sure to hide any grid lines/level marks/anotations in the view from which you're generating renders. That solved it for me.
ai is dangerous
So are cars
hmmmnnnnope... results are trash, not shareable with clients. overall it destroys important shapes, wich no AD would accept.
-Implying that you only use rendering at the final stage of the project and not during initial planning of the aesthetic direction. I agree - these renders should never be shown to clients, because they are quite dishonest (you'd have so much fun trying to replicate the same "feel" during the construction dev phase) , but for sure they enhance the decision making process of "where am I taking this design in terms of aesthetics?"
Keep in mind that tools like this will probably improve dramatically in the next few years.
Bro, answer pls, if I'll watch all video at ur channel (and ofc i copy staff from it in rhino+grass) will I have a good based lvl in rhino grass?
All 270 of them? Yea, fair to sau you would be pretty good at grasshopper. Start here: ua-cam.com/video/IdAq7PX3kwA/v-deo.html
@@DesignGoBrr thanks a lot bro! I'm just a student + work in arch bureaus, wanna become a best in this profession!
what is the helllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
I know right?!
This is where everything is headed, it's sad.
Not necessarily. It will be sad only if artists/designers loose control by not keeping up with the development of these tools. If this becomes yet another tool under the belt of an architect, then I'm optimistic.
@@DesignGoBrr What's to keep up with, if you can write a sentence now you can generate a rendering.
@@clarkkent5830 think 2 steps deeper about this. What kind of rendering? What are the qualities of said workflow? Drawbacks? What constitutes as "good rendering" ?.. Come on. Putting just a bit extra thought into any topic pushes you out of the "it's either black or white" territory
@@DesignGoBrr Apparently I'm thinking beyond 2 steps deeper. If this AI can create a rendering that's pretty good in a few seconds right now what do you think it will be able to do in a few years? Don't think for a minute that Architects & Designers won't jump at the chance to replace an expensive employee with a cheep AI. This has been coming for a long time and I'm not happy to see it but the march of the machine is going to take a lot of peoples jobs in the coming years.