C++ in 100 Seconds

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 чер 2024
  • C++ or C-plus-plus or Cpp is an extremely popular object-oriented programming language. Created in 1979, today it powers game engines, databases, compilers, embedded systems, desktop software, and much of our software infrastructure.
    #programming #compsci #100SecondsOfCode
    🔗 Resources
    Microsoft Docs docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/
    Bjarne Stroustrup Homepage www.stroustrup.com/
    C in 100 Seconds • C in 100 Seconds
    C# in 100 Seconds • C# in 100 Seconds
    🔥 Get More Content - Upgrade to PRO
    Upgrade to Fireship PRO at fireship.io/pro
    Use code lORhwXd2 for 25% off your first payment.
    🎨 My Editor Settings
    - Atom One Dark
    - vscode-icons
    - Fira Code Font
    🔖 Topics Covered
    - What is C++?
    - C++ basics tutorial
    - Who invented C++?
    - What is C++ used for?
    - What is a smart pointer?
    - C++ vs C
    - Object oriented programming basics
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,8 тис.

  • @ShortHax
    @ShortHax 2 роки тому +21436

    C++ is like Lego. You can assemble the castle of your dreams, or you can scream in pain as you step on the pieces scattered on the floor

    • @filipanimations6967
      @filipanimations6967 2 роки тому +335

      Underrated comment

    • @SomeRandomPiggo
      @SomeRandomPiggo 2 роки тому +567

      @@filipanimations6967 dude its been 4 minutes lol

    • @FaZekiller-qe3uf
      @FaZekiller-qe3uf 2 роки тому +247

      @@filipanimations6967 it was only made 15 minutes ago, and is quite literally the highest rated comment.

    • @ferdam666
      @ferdam666 2 роки тому +96

      stepping on lego is enjoyable.

    • @charlesriley2717
      @charlesriley2717 2 роки тому +12

      It's more like Playmobil

  • @helpfulprogrammer
    @helpfulprogrammer 2 роки тому +11504

    In C++ we don't say "Missing asterisk" we say "error C2664: 'void std::vector::push_back(const block &)': cannot convert argument 1 from 'std::_Vector_iterator' to 'block &&'"

    • @546dman
      @546dman 2 роки тому +607

      😭

    • @SuperDraganco
      @SuperDraganco 2 роки тому +1464

      and I think it's beautiful

    • @mikeg9b
      @mikeg9b 2 роки тому +696

      That's one thing Rust has going for it: understandable error messages that usually tell you what to do to fix the problem.

    • @michalkotlicki4710
      @michalkotlicki4710 2 роки тому +314

      Understandable, have a great day

    • @kopuz.co.uk.
      @kopuz.co.uk. 2 роки тому +212

      @@mikeg9b That is an understandable error message though, Helpful programmer is trying to insert the wrong type into a vector.

  • @jomy10-games
    @jomy10-games 2 роки тому +722

    “We can get rid of this STD though”
    *listens carefully*

    • @CyberCat45
      @CyberCat45 4 місяці тому

      It’s so fun to tell friends that c++ is full of stds

    • @EStartive
      @EStartive 2 місяці тому +3

      💀

    • @blauesaxolotl
      @blauesaxolotl 2 місяці тому +27

      My youtube app literally translates this to "sexuell übertragbare Krankheiten" which is "sexual transferable disease" in german

    • @gabrielesalvatori6804
      @gabrielesalvatori6804 Місяць тому +2

      @@blauesaxolotl yeah std is the acronym for sexual transmittable desease in english

    • @blauesaxolotl
      @blauesaxolotl Місяць тому +4

      @@gabrielesalvatori6804 i know but i just thougt it's funny that my app actually spells it out like that when translating it

  • @UselessDuckCompany
    @UselessDuckCompany 2 роки тому +4001

    I'm about 2 weeks now in my journey of learning C++ and freeRTOS for programming some ESP32s, and from a JS/Python person POV it's a whole new perspective, you really feel like you are controlling a computer down to the bare metal for the first time. I think every programming enthusiast should try it. Especially with something like a microcontroller where you really need to care about the stack/heap and living inside of a few 100k of ram.

    • @bruh._.2911
      @bruh._.2911 2 роки тому +166

      i did the inverse thing, I started from c++ and now im learning JS. God JS is (at least for me ) "more caotic"

    • @amineabdz
      @amineabdz 2 роки тому +271

      @@gabrielkennethmarinas6244 Because web dev and scripting is a lot more common and is easier than working with microcontrollers and kernels and game development.

    • @firstdingus
      @firstdingus 2 роки тому +53

      Than try to program a 32 bit x86 assembly language bootloader. 😅

    • @Ali-ts8wn
      @Ali-ts8wn 2 роки тому +2

      What app or website to learn these languages

    • @znation4434
      @znation4434 2 роки тому +5

      How are you going about learning it? Starting from Python myself.

  • @dan203
    @dan203 2 роки тому +4293

    Couldn’t fit operator overloading into 100s? 😉
    C++ is a huge language. I've been doing C++ professionally for 15 years and still learn new things all the time.

    • @manishtaker8622
      @manishtaker8622 2 роки тому +182

      It is one of the most fcked up things i have ever see and learnt but still get blown away by it🤣🤣

    • @sajibsrs
      @sajibsrs 2 роки тому +60

      You got me partner. Friend class and function, macros?! Ah... There are many of them.

    • @dan203
      @dan203 2 роки тому +141

      @@sajibsrs macros aren’t even technically part of the C/C++ code, they're a feature of the compiler. But yet they’re so ubiquitous you'll need to learn those too.
      If you really want to melt your brain look into templates.

    • @ntrgc89
      @ntrgc89 2 роки тому +31

      Yea and what about templates? SFINAE anyone?

    • @samuelmahler5961
      @samuelmahler5961 2 роки тому +8

      @@ntrgc89 F*** SFINAE. It is so damn easy to f up with that. Thank heavens for concepts.

  • @Zex-4729
    @Zex-4729 2 роки тому +1281

    C++ is my first language and it's really fun to learn. It also made learning other languages very easy.

    • @thomasdecorail8825
      @thomasdecorail8825 Рік тому +24

      If you could start over, would you learn Python instead ?

    • @alexanderangelkov6338
      @alexanderangelkov6338 Рік тому +87

      In my uni we have mandatory courses for introduction in programming, object oriented and data structures all in c++ You learn the lower level and then all the other languages that are higher level feel dumb lol

    • @v01d_r34l1ty
      @v01d_r34l1ty Рік тому +14

      @@alexanderangelkov6338 we do java at my uni :((

    • @felipebrunetta2106
      @felipebrunetta2106 Рік тому +94

      @@o_sch Yes. Roblox studio. The main factor in picking a language

    • @electrorakan5894
      @electrorakan5894 Рік тому +9

      i'm planning to start with c++ and go for java after ( maybe JS after java ) but mainly i'm planning to start with c++ and java after it is that good ?

  • @Speglritz
    @Speglritz 2 роки тому +920

    The benefits of unique pointers are not to only allocate something once, it's more about making sure a resource is only deallocated once as it will call the underlying objects destructor when it goes out of scope together with the fact that it can only have a single owner.

    • @sebastiangudino9377
      @sebastiangudino9377 2 роки тому +100

      It took me almost a decade of programing to have the knowledge to fully understand this sentence. It truly sounds like sci-fi giberish out of context

    • @marioc485
      @marioc485 2 роки тому +30

      Yes. I 100% agree..
      What are we talking about?

    • @wiserdivisor
      @wiserdivisor 2 роки тому +2

      Hello Asura! You seem to be really good with C++ and your channel has some hardware related stuff which also looks very cool. I am kind of new to the IT industry and I want to reach big boy level CPP along with hardware stuff that you have going there. wat do?

    • @fj12n3
      @fj12n3 2 роки тому +5

      Yeah that wasn't well explained

    • @CheatCodeSam
      @CheatCodeSam 2 роки тому +34

      C++ is honestly a pretty simple language as long as you’re taking advantage of smart pointers and other modern c++ features.

  • @AnoNymous-dh2sv
    @AnoNymous-dh2sv 2 роки тому +238

    C++ of 2022, is EXTREMELY different to C++ of 20+ years ago. Now it has extremely high level libraries on the DEFAULT spec so you can do things that any extremely high level language like python did by default (like text parsing) and I think if it had those features from the start dozens of popular languages would not even EXIST.

    • @drygordspellweaver8761
      @drygordspellweaver8761 Рік тому +4

      Can you list the 10 best features of modern C++

    • @Db_BW
      @Db_BW 10 місяців тому

      @@drygordspellweaver8761 I can mention some. Functions to convert strings to integers and vice-versa that were not existing. (2) Algorithms library that has like 100+ functionalities. (3) Boost library. (4) Lamba functions. (5) Modern Containers like sets, maps, and others. They are elegantly done and they are efficient too. (6) The std namespace has been immensely expanded through C++ 14, 17, and 20. You can check it out. There are so many new features that make C++ look really modern these days. One example is the array class. (7) Three-way comparison operator. (8) Coroutines

    • @drygordspellweaver8761
      @drygordspellweaver8761 10 місяців тому +8

      @@Db_BW Thanks I appreciate it. I am not closed off to C++ as it is ubiquitous these days, but for sure I prefer oldschool C for it's elegance.

    • @yihan4835
      @yihan4835 9 місяців тому

      @@drygordspellweaver8761 smart pointers, move semantics, concurrency, lambda expressions, structured binding, concepts, uniform initialization, auto & decltype, range based for loop, fold expression.

    • @dylanalpers
      @dylanalpers 8 місяців тому

      @@drygordspellweaver8761 for some reason I can only see your replies, do you mind passing along that "best feature" list?

  • @mayanxoni
    @mayanxoni 2 роки тому +239

    The double colon operator (::) that's used to define functions outside the class is called the Scope Resolution Operator.

    • @swipefn1931
      @swipefn1931 Рік тому +7

      using namespace really helps to not write those ::

    • @codewithjc4617
      @codewithjc4617 Рік тому +7

      @@swipefn1931Better not to ever use scoping directives, best to always specify full scope, or if necessary only use it at local scopes.

    • @AlwaysEast
      @AlwaysEast 3 місяці тому +1

      Today I learned, tomorrow I'll forget. They will forever be Marvel's Celestial eyes.

  • @ForTheOmnissiah
    @ForTheOmnissiah Рік тому +106

    c++ having a string library means everything. Having done a course in Operating Systems that was C and that's it, having to manually write string manipulation functions was quite tedious. Not impossible or incredibly difficult, but felt like reinventing the wheel.

    • @dorgrosglick8234
      @dorgrosglick8234 8 місяців тому +4

      That's so true. I feel exactly the same!

    • @Pulko172
      @Pulko172 6 місяців тому +1

      As someone who just started c++ and doesn't know what a string is, i agree!

    • @MohamedAhmed-le8mv
      @MohamedAhmed-le8mv 5 місяців тому

      @@Pulko172 hey, I just started c++ 3 days ago. I bought a course on Udemy and doing it. haha
      any chance we can learn together?

    • @Je_suis_ton_pere
      @Je_suis_ton_pere 5 місяців тому +1

      @@Pulko172 I hoped you learnt was a string was 4 week later

  • @B1GTM4N
    @B1GTM4N 2 роки тому +598

    My first, relatively big project I wrote in C++ was a Raytracer! Was (and still is) one of my most favourite projects to date!
    Awesome video as always, well written, spoken, and very informative!
    Thanks Jeff!

    • @EddEdw
      @EddEdw 2 роки тому +9

      Oh, funnily, it was the same for me in 2014!!! Okay, it was only ray-casting, but to this day, I fondly remember the fun (really) I had when messing around with bit shifting. 😊

    • @mr.mirror1213
      @mr.mirror1213 2 роки тому +3

      Hey man , I am trying to write a ray tracer but stuck at getting a good diffusion effect , any good resources?

    • @charlesm.2604
      @charlesm.2604 2 роки тому +43

      @@EddEdw You guys are nuts to find these fun worthy but god damn it's a flex

    • @sajibsrs
      @sajibsrs 2 роки тому

      Ah sounds easy :p

    • @klutch4198
      @klutch4198 2 роки тому

      hell yeah!

  • @oraqlle
    @oraqlle 2 роки тому +672

    It’s funny how, even with as much as you covered in as much detail as you can in 165 seconds, the language has evolved so much that discussing templates, lambdas, the ranges library and functional patterns in addition to everything you covered would mean anyone would have to go at “rap god” just to get through it all in the small timeframe. Relay impressed on the level of detail you did go to for this video. Excellent job, love your work! Looking forward to the next one.

    • @sophiacristina
      @sophiacristina 2 роки тому +9

      Omg, when i wanted to have fun programming on DOS with non-standard c++ from 1989... That is basically C... Really...
      You can see how much c++ changed if you use Borland turbo c++...

    • @BrotherCheng
      @BrotherCheng Рік тому +12

      I think just going through the more than dozen ways of initializing a variable in C++ these days will take more than 100 seconds.

  • @ntrgc89
    @ntrgc89 2 роки тому +1398

    "using namespace std;" is kind of an anti-pattern. It's almost like saying "import *" in Python. You code becomes more terse, but now you can't tell if a keyword is builtin or from the namespace (or from the other namespace you 'used'/imported). And never put this in a header file, it'll hose anyone who includes your header.

    • @aap2764
      @aap2764 2 роки тому +369

      but getting rid of stds is good and healthy

    • @acedev003
      @acedev003 2 роки тому +2

      Very valid fact here......

    • @ssholum
      @ssholum 2 роки тому +37

      C++ weekly learnt me out of that "using namespace" habit real quick with his explanation of it.

    • @climatechangedoesntbargain9140
      @climatechangedoesntbargain9140 2 роки тому +32

      @NerdCademy same, I just wtf every time I see this in tutorials - just why??

    • @jamesevans2507
      @jamesevans2507 2 роки тому +10

      @NerdCademy No one cares for a quick demo incels, have sex

  • @t0prar
    @t0prar 2 роки тому +462

    C++ was created as a superset of C but they have diverged since.

    • @Ovicron
      @Ovicron 2 роки тому +86

      Oh absolutely. The general consensus in the cpp community is to avoid many of the vanilla C features which makes certain code unsafe.

    • @fallenIights
      @fallenIights 2 роки тому +4

      Why

    • @02orochi
      @02orochi 2 роки тому +76

      @@fallenIights not a c++ programmer but its obvious that trying to be a Superset of c took a lotta baggage. Im sure c++ wouldve been much cleaner if it wasnt trying to be c with classes

    • @cypher3905
      @cypher3905 2 роки тому +81

      @@fallenIights Because you can do almost anything in C, including stuff that will break a program faster than anything else. C++ tends to be more secure and make it harder to do something stupid. Mixing old C and modern C++ is a good way to give you headache as they doesn't really have the same concepts anymore.
      C++ get rids of the low level heap allocation (and deallocation) which the source of most of the bugs in C programs.
      Not sure everything said above was english btw ....

    • @t0prar
      @t0prar 2 роки тому +70

      ​@@fallenIights
      C++ is a superset of C89/90 but since C99 things like variable length arrays and the restricted keyword have been introduced to C that are not present within C++.
      Why? Different committees make different decisions. 🤷

  • @thehellberg
    @thehellberg 2 роки тому +286

    You literally explained the Sololearn C++ course in a hundred seconds

    • @leoingson
      @leoingson 2 роки тому +4

      Hehe.

    • @klutch4198
      @klutch4198 2 роки тому +15

      I have actually taken that course and have the cert from it... haha!

    • @adenosinetp10
      @adenosinetp10 2 роки тому +3

      Hi Botfather!

  • @santoshmohanram536
    @santoshmohanram536 2 роки тому +71

    Most waited video. Very big fan for your work brother. Happy to see you explaining my favorite language C++. Keep Rocking brother

  • @wojtekpolska1013
    @wojtekpolska1013 2 роки тому +26

    In school they showed us basics of a few different programming languages, and i think C++ was my personal favourite out of all of them, i hope to learn more of it in the future

  • @maxkratt
    @maxkratt 2 роки тому +126

    Could you do Lua in 100 Seconds next, please?

  • @kartikpatel3940
    @kartikpatel3940 2 роки тому +204

    C++ has been one of my favourite languages ever since i learned it. Its blazing fast but sucks when it comes to cross platform apps you need to build code for every single architecture and every platform that your app support.

    • @SirSidi
      @SirSidi 2 роки тому +12

      I heard someone asking about Java

    • @sophiacristina
      @sophiacristina 2 роки тому +20

      It is my fav language, i think that being such low-level and comprehensible for and high-level language is cool...
      Yes, it may have lot of things like come people criticize, but i think that is cool, every programmer can have a style and in fact, you can use it in a pretty simple way, because some basic commands are enough to mess with everything...
      I like python too, but i got so adapted to pointers that i have to reconfigure my brain when using python...
      I used to think those things were confusing until you get used to it and in fact it is super simple...
      Some logic is wrong? Having problem with objects and classes? Well, cast it as (char *) and f- it! Works like magic!

    • @climatechangedoesntbargain9140
      @climatechangedoesntbargain9140 2 роки тому +14

      It was for me, too.
      Until I discovered Rust

    • @sophiacristina
      @sophiacristina 2 роки тому +2

      @Glizzster That is another cool things about C++, since it is kinda old, there is lot of libs...
      Also, game and music, there is lot of c++ stuff... I think because speed and stuff...

    • @OConnelsSideOfDaRiver
      @OConnelsSideOfDaRiver 2 роки тому +2

      Java: "Am I a joke to you?"

  • @syedmubazir4371
    @syedmubazir4371 2 роки тому +11

    2:40
    Compiler Error - > Syntax Error
    Expected ' ; ' near ".
    😂😂

  • @KushalChandar.
    @KushalChandar. 2 роки тому +128

    '

    • @Ovicron
      @Ovicron 2 роки тому +27

      and '>>' extraction operator when used with std::cin.

    • @DrDemolition
      @DrDemolition 2 роки тому +19

      @@Ovicron
      weird naming convention
      cin-sertion and cout-sertion is way better 😂

    • @TheMR-777
      @TheMR-777 2 роки тому +5

      Well, I kinda prefer Bit-Shift Left, and Bit-Shift Right, as they make more sense, when you do actual Bit-Shifting

    • @igorswies5913
      @igorswies5913 2 роки тому +9

      @@TheMR-777 it says "when used with cout"

    • @TheMR-777
      @TheMR-777 2 роки тому +1

      @@igorswies5913 Mmm, yeah, we “can” say. But I meant, although it's beginner-friendly, one may get to know the real term, when he/she will see the “actual” usage of that operator. It may confuse them at that point (as it did to me).

  • @NNNedlog
    @NNNedlog 2 роки тому +57

    I was watching your "session vs turn authentication" when I got the video notification. Your videos are so helpful

  • @TheMR-777
    @TheMR-777 2 роки тому +21

    I've been mastering all the standards of C++, as it has become my favorite language!
    I love the Quote of Bjarne about Blowing the foot off :)
    So true,

    • @someshwartripathi8446
      @someshwartripathi8446 2 роки тому +4

      How? Can you give us an example?

    • @TheMR-777
      @TheMR-777 2 роки тому +7

      @@someshwartripathi8446 My perspective can be different, but it's somehow related to the people who criticize C++ :)
      As, I have seen many people (mostly unguided beginners, unfortunately) who start working in C++, and then get frustrated by the warnings and errors, which the compilers give (many times causing a cascade of errors).
      Instead, they start working in some higher level language, and the code just “runs”. They become happy, but when the code is used in real-time scenarios, they get badly failed.
      And it gets extremely difficult, and complicated to trace down that error, they made in their logic.
      Simply, we should always try to improve ourselves, optimize our logics, and only then compiler will help us grow along. Otherwise, you may have got the meaning of blowing the foot off :)

  • @Shiniiee
    @Shiniiee 2 роки тому +354

    Minor gripe: at 1:22, we don't call that the "bitwise shift left" in this context, but the stream insertion operator, or steam operator. Operators can be overloaded in C++, but people try to keep it "usual".

    • @chadgregory9037
      @chadgregory9037 2 роки тому +31

      and he called it double colon, not scope resolution operator!!!

    • @liambohl
      @liambohl 2 роки тому +8

      I was very confused when he called it a "bitwise shift left". For a second, I wondered if insertion had just been a shift this whole time, then I remembered writing my own insertion operators and realized my folly.

    • @keyboard_toucher
      @keyboard_toucher 2 роки тому +12

      He is "keeping it usual" by calling it the shift left operator. Given that it is overloadable, its meaning in any particular context could be anything, but its usual meaning is shift left, which is therefore the best name for the operator overall.

    • @NyscanRohid
      @NyscanRohid Рік тому +18

      But it _is_ the bitwise left shift operator. You might not call it that, but many C++ programmers do. Bitwise operations are the original purpose of the shift operators. The only reason they're called stream operators after the fact is because the developers of std::iostream overloaded them for covenience.

    • @ruix
      @ruix Рік тому +4

      You mean the less than sign?

  • @TheOriginalJohnDoe
    @TheOriginalJohnDoe 2 роки тому +5

    "A class is just a blueprint for an object". Gosh that's the best concise explanation I've ever heard.

  • @MrBomberman11
    @MrBomberman11 2 роки тому +8

    Would really love a video like this on VHDL or another lesser known language! Great vid as always!

  • @rodarg
    @rodarg 2 роки тому

    Was looking for a C++ video on your channel yesterday, well here it is

  • @jacksontriffon5064
    @jacksontriffon5064 2 роки тому +23

    Fireship is pumping out quality videos extremely fast since hitting 1M subs 🔥 seriously insane. We're loving it, just don't burn yourself out 😁

  • @Noah-vm8id
    @Noah-vm8id 2 роки тому +3

    I'm currently learning C++ in my internship (ok actually teach myself) and am really thankful for this video, really brought me some background infos

  • @baconcake949
    @baconcake949 2 роки тому +8

    Loving the 100s second series currently, could you do a sort of general Programming Vobulary in 100 seconds? I've noticed a lot of terms being used in a lot of these and I don't always know what they mean.

  • @dietznuts4014
    @dietznuts4014 Рік тому

    Bravo, you basically went through everything you go through in intro to CS for C++ and very well!

  • @ewwitsantonio
    @ewwitsantonio 2 роки тому

    OOooo I've been hoping you'd do C++! Awesome! Thanks so much for these great videos.

  • @awabqureshi814
    @awabqureshi814 2 роки тому +4

    PERFECT TIMING I JUST STARTED LEARNING THIS YESTERDAY AND WAS CONFUSED

  • @KaSSa__
    @KaSSa__ 2 роки тому +7

    Been working with C++ and Qt for about 5 years. Please send help.

  • @raghebbn5485
    @raghebbn5485 2 роки тому

    Man finally you uploaded a
    c++ in 100sec
    I've been waiting for it thanks man you are the best and keep going bro
    we are watching your back

  • @nemeziz_prime
    @nemeziz_prime 2 роки тому +6

    Would love to see a full fledged Fireship course on C++ for beginners

  • @RemnantCult
    @RemnantCult 2 роки тому +13

    God bless my university for using this language as the first language you learn. It's like learning how to drive with a 12 gear semi.

  • @NikNacLegend
    @NikNacLegend 2 роки тому +3

    Thanks for making this fireship. I'm currently learning c++ so this has been a real help 👍

  • @richtigmann1
    @richtigmann1 2 роки тому +1

    It came out right as I was getting into C++! I was waiting for this one!

  • @ThyTrueNightmare
    @ThyTrueNightmare 2 роки тому +2

    Very good overview, I think during uni the hardest part about it is our lecturers refused to teach us it

  • @meceffeukada3767
    @meceffeukada3767 2 роки тому +184

    I'm so glad I learned C and C++ basics in college before going after high level languages like Java, Python and JavaScript. Struggling with pointers, data structures and memory management makes other languages like a piece of cake, the only problem i faced was the different way of coding as in general coding in C and C++ is mostly procedural while with the languages i mentioned it's mostly POO + Functional

    • @KManAbout
      @KManAbout 2 роки тому +1

      The other languages are only missing memory management.

    • @supernenechi
      @supernenechi 2 роки тому

      @@KManAbout You mean languages like JS and Python? Aren't those expecting you to rely on garbage collectors? You're right that you as the programmer should care about memory management and not just leave it to something else

    • @KManAbout
      @KManAbout 2 роки тому +7

      @@supernenechi I am saying that js and so on lack manual memory management. (go has pointers). Garbage collection is auto mem management. I think that it is unnecessary to manually manage memory in most circumstances. Garbage collection supports general programming practices by utilising DRY principles.

    • @KManAbout
      @KManAbout 2 роки тому +1

      Every other problem in other languages persist like advanced data structures and like.

    • @BeastinlosersHD
      @BeastinlosersHD 2 роки тому +9

      @@KManAbout hot take, been learning go for my upcoming internship and it makes me wanna die. It’s like someone made a proof of concept language and it got to popular.

  • @flyte9844
    @flyte9844 2 роки тому +37

    thanks for making advanced programming accessible to people with an average size brain like myself jeff , very cool !

  • @zerxer7987
    @zerxer7987 2 роки тому +21

    I didnt know programming languages had std's

  • @KonradGolinski
    @KonradGolinski 2 роки тому +2

    I love your videos ;) I suggest making a video about embedded software - in ATMs, arcade machines, GPS, etc.
    Also one about Windows Embedded would be great

  • @oussamawahbi4976
    @oussamawahbi4976 2 роки тому +10

    "we can get rid of this STD" -Jeff Delaney 2022

  • @wearesciber
    @wearesciber 2 роки тому +3

    I was explaining to my mom "Why C++" yesterday and then today you released this video! Perfect Timing!

    • @philmakesnoise
      @philmakesnoise 27 днів тому

      Man that's weird, I was just explaining it to your mom too.

  • @m1ch4l28
    @m1ch4l28 2 роки тому

    Currently I'm creating a presentation about Object Oriented Programming and C++.
    I was wondering why you didn't cover this popular language yet.
    A few days later I watch this video - perfect timing I guess! :D

  • @mohanaggarwal4058
    @mohanaggarwal4058 2 роки тому +5

    C++ is a wholesome bombshell, thats why u need to handle it carefully, if u not it will blow away ur whole leg.

  • @zxnnightstalker2289
    @zxnnightstalker2289 2 роки тому +6

    There are also,
    C++'s template Normal programming and meta programming.
    Operator overloading(any operator, with extra spaceship operator)

  • @hunter_bs463
    @hunter_bs463 11 місяців тому

    Good overview, I just started learning the language so it helps to understand the concepts

  • @slimaloui920
    @slimaloui920 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much for your work ! You are an inspiration for me !

  • @0xchrisjones993
    @0xchrisjones993 2 роки тому +6

    Now that I have been in JS for a while, I really miss writing code in Cpp. Especially with libraries like Opengl or DirectX it was hella fun

  • @astralchan
    @astralchan 2 роки тому +22

    2:30
    std::unique_ptr ptrJeff(new Human);
    When using the new keyword, allocate is still done to the heap like a normal pointer. Consider this instead:
    std::unique_ptr ptrJeff = std::make_unique();
    Or, even:
    auto ptrJeff = std::make_unique();
    This is especially important for shared pointers. For unique pointers, the only difference in the end is exception handling.
    Also, smart pointers need #include .
    Another thing to keep in mind is that these were added in c++11, so it might even be a good idea to specify. -std=c++11 or later.

    • @isodoubIet
      @isodoubIet Рік тому

      make_unique also allocates on the heap. There's no difference there. The main difference between using make_unique and unique_ptr(new x) is with exceptions: if you have an expression with two unique_ptr(new bla) subexpressions, the order of evaluation is unspecified which means you might run two "new"s and then the two unique_ptr constructions. If the second new throws an exception, the first one will leak. This may have been fixed with the evaluation order changes in c++17 but I don't see a point in risking it.
      make_unique also has a teachability benefit in that you can give a blanket guidelines like "never use the keyword new" and it'll be valid every time.

    • @astralchan
      @astralchan Рік тому

      @@isodoubIet Yes, they are also allocated to the heap. I mean that using new allocates without the ref counting / etc of smart pointers.

  • @christrifinopoulos8639
    @christrifinopoulos8639 Місяць тому +1

    thank you I watched this video and build my own compiler with the knowledge I gained

  • @xanthe69
    @xanthe69 2 роки тому +1

    The video I wanted for so long, thanks dude

  • @mohanaggarwal4058
    @mohanaggarwal4058 2 роки тому +10

    C++ was my first programming language, and i loved❤️ it ever since.

  • @Nicolas-jx3oo
    @Nicolas-jx3oo 2 роки тому +24

    We live in a blessed area where technical subjects such as this one can be found explained as quick as this video and yet comprehensively
    Thank you so much

  • @HypnosisBear
    @HypnosisBear 2 роки тому +2

    Finally!! What I wanted! C++ in 100 seconds. Thx dude.

  • @CodingWithLewis
    @CodingWithLewis 2 роки тому +2

    Amazing video as always!

  • @arshiaaghaei
    @arshiaaghaei 9 місяців тому +6

    A couple things to add:
    1. C code is likely to not run on C++ compilers because of the fact that C++ doesn't consider some C keywords as valid (like restrict)
    2. It's advised to avoid using namespace std and instead either use something like using std::cout or just using std::cout all the time.

    • @prodbykomrebi
      @prodbykomrebi 7 місяців тому +3

      also use '
      ' instead of std::endl so it doesn't flush every newline

    • @arshiaaghaei
      @arshiaaghaei 7 місяців тому +1

      @@prodbykomrebi Yup I forgot to add this, even tho this should be fine outside loops

  • @thorvaldspear
    @thorvaldspear 2 роки тому +53

    This was my first introduction to programming. My parents signed me up for a free coding course, learning C++, and a quite rigorous one at that (homework and everything). I was in third grade.
    The result was what I can only describe as a mild form of PTSD, where I would cry every time I talked about how I didn't understand programming. This lasted for multiple years; only recently has that trauma worn off enough to where I can have an interest in programming again. And yes, typing that semicolon in the previous sentence was still painful.

    • @thorvaldspear
      @thorvaldspear 2 роки тому +1

      @@schrayhu Actually, that's exactly what I've been doing. Needless to say, It's a breath of fresh air.

    • @S3Kglitches
      @S3Kglitches 2 роки тому +5

      @@thorvaldspear starting programming with C++ is indeed a nice recipe for PTSD

    • @alipetuniashow
      @alipetuniashow Рік тому

      @@S3Kglitches not necessarily, it can be good to start with it

    • @biqbicle4982
      @biqbicle4982 Рік тому

      @@S3Kglitches I've been doing C++ as my first language for 2 years and I can say very well after trying out multiple other languages, I love C++ the most!

  • @hasinaramanandraitsiory3647
    @hasinaramanandraitsiory3647 Рік тому +1

    This is a golden content. I swear if you got some programming background just by watching the video you could do a lot of stuff hahah

  • @isaiahehli2357
    @isaiahehli2357 19 днів тому

    Amazed for the detail of explanation in so little time!

  • @WhohateAmerica
    @WhohateAmerica 2 роки тому +4

    I thought the video would be something like: "It is literally impossible to describe and C++ concept in a more or less undersandable fashion in just 100 secs, so please enjoy the remaining 95 secs of this nice Lo-Fi music. Thank you!"

  • @babaganaabba785
    @babaganaabba785 2 роки тому +25

    I’ve never clicked on anything as fast as this 😂

  • @Rasa_b
    @Rasa_b 9 місяців тому +2

    I use C++ for embedded programs and algorithmic contests for speed only.it’s really hard to master but once you get a hang of it you will become unstoppable.Learning how to program in my opinion is like learning how to drive,first you learn it with manual transmission and after you have mastered it automatic transmission becomes second nature to you and you learn it faster.for programming you should start with a low level language like C++ (stay the f away from assembly) you will gain a lot of insight about how your program is interacting with hardware and after you learn that learning any other language will become easier and faster for you

  • @zprestige1
    @zprestige1 2 роки тому +1

    You should make videos for each big programming language to show what its used for and what you can make with it and some ideas

  • @astralchan
    @astralchan 2 роки тому +6

    1:28 "... by adding [using namespace std] to the top of the file." It's generally considered bad practice to do this in the global scope.

  • @alin1179
    @alin1179 2 місяці тому +3

    Alright, I'm going to add C++ to my cv

  • @kanzanaveed
    @kanzanaveed 2 роки тому +1

    I have learned & written C++ for 3 semesters and this video feels so satisfying in some way nostalgic too 😶💛

  • @gamaray6136
    @gamaray6136 Рік тому

    For two minutes you managed to fit a decent amount of core language features, I have to say

  • @lgamer5133
    @lgamer5133 2 роки тому +4

    The explosion effect always gets me🤣

  • @Tibor0991
    @Tibor0991 2 роки тому +3

    I can feel the struggle of trying to cram every aspect of C++ in 100 seconds. Btw, "using namespace" and "new" mixed with smart pointers made me scream in pain.

  • @mastcharub7177
    @mastcharub7177 2 роки тому +1

    Finally!! I love you! can you make also ASM x86-64, Batch and OrbitDB?

  • @TheStickofWar
    @TheStickofWar 2 роки тому +1

    It's a bit scary that I decided to finally start learning C++ for work so I can get involved in our open source code and then boom, you release a video.

  • @sankethb.k642
    @sankethb.k642 2 роки тому +19

    I used to write C++ 3 years ago, and this video was nostalgic

    • @ggsap
      @ggsap 2 роки тому +1

      What do you write now?
      Did you switch?

    • @KMBatman
      @KMBatman 2 роки тому +1

      Ye

    • @vintagewander
      @vintagewander 2 роки тому +1

      same

    • @KMBatman
      @KMBatman 2 роки тому +1

      @@vintagewander what do you write in now?

  • @InstantlyEdits
    @InstantlyEdits 2 роки тому +6

    Suggestion: Make a video about Node.js C++ Addons!

  • @jakubmichalenko7990
    @jakubmichalenko7990 2 роки тому +2

    Great video, cause I have been recently learning c++ because I’m trying to switch from c#, I have absolutely no problem with C# I just want to get on lower level.

  • @shreechatane9215
    @shreechatane9215 2 роки тому +2

    I have been a cpp coder for a long time , can feel the vibe ^ _ ^

  • @manuellernst3700
    @manuellernst3700 2 роки тому +9

    It would've been great if you mentioned that C++ can already be used in Web Dev with tools like Emcc. Great video anyway, just as all of your videos

    • @phil-gd6es
      @phil-gd6es 2 роки тому +2

      But... why? It's the same blasphamy as node.js but in reverse, using an application language for web development.

    • @groszak1
      @groszak1 Рік тому +1

      @@phil-gd6es C++ renderers however can be much faster than HTML since instead of invoking bloated parsers and renderers you write only a few ints or so per frame which are native computational operations.

  • @v_iancu
    @v_iancu 2 роки тому +40

    1:27 Bad practice, global using directives cause name conflicts. If you want to omit the namespace prefix you can add local using directives where you need them

    • @oussamawahbi4976
      @oussamawahbi4976 2 роки тому +23

      It's never a bad practice to get rid of STDs

    • @pratiklondhe5167
      @pratiklondhe5167 2 роки тому +5

      @@oussamawahbi4976 lol

    • @charlesriley2717
      @charlesriley2717 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah I wasn't suprised Fireship didn't know that, he is a web developer so stupid cpp conventions are never prevelant.

    • @mrocto329
      @mrocto329 2 роки тому +3

      @@charlesriley2717 I know Fireship does these videos with care, but I feel his videos are feeling more and more rushed as time passes. I notice many bad practices or straight up bad code in his examples, making the languages look bad. I've also been paying attention to the community and I feel this is just feeding the Javascript community's ego (As in, they are slowly thinking Javascript is the only sane language when there are many AMAZING languages out there!).

    • @threepointonefour607
      @threepointonefour607 2 роки тому +3

      This entire video was a bit of a disaster. `

  • @Danielle-ew1el
    @Danielle-ew1el Місяць тому

    i admire your work ethic and your dedication to your channel! ️

  • @ieatgarbage8771
    @ieatgarbage8771 11 місяців тому +1

    the > used for cout and cin aren't bitshifts. They just happen to use the same symbol as a bitshift because symbols are scarce.

    • @n0ame1u1
      @n0ame1u1 Місяць тому

      Actually, the standard refers to those symbols as "bitwise left shift" and "bitwise right shift". Specifically see the table on the "arithmetic operators" page in cppreference, which gives the general names of the operators.
      But yes, people do also often call them the stream output and stream extraction operators.

  • @precumming
    @precumming 2 роки тому +22

    ``

    • @lior_haddad
      @lior_haddad 2 роки тому +1

      Well, just because it isn't used for bitwise shift left doesn't mean it isn't the bitwise shift left operator... If my class overrides the >= operator to work as a weird assignment operator, it doesn't stop it from being the "greater than or equal to" operator...

    • @precumming
      @precumming 2 роки тому +3

      @@lior_haddad But the symbol already has a name, "output operator".
      If it didn't have a name then maybe you could call it "bitwise shift left operator" although that's muddying the waters because it doesn't do what that name is.

    • @charlesriley2717
      @charlesriley2717 2 роки тому +1

      Such a dumb way to output to terminal

    • @precumming
      @precumming 2 роки тому +1

      @@charlesriley2717 I agree, one of the many annoyances and weird quirks resulting in why I don't touch C++ anymore (♥ Rust)

    • @alpers.2123
      @alpers.2123 2 роки тому

      #include
      int main(){
      std::printf("hi mom!
      ");
      return 0;
      }

  • @beyondcatastrophe_
    @beyondcatastrophe_ 2 роки тому +3

    `using namespace std` is really bad practice though, it pollutes the current namespace and can cause really obscure compilation problems due to conflicts

  • @masnanang5305
    @masnanang5305 2 роки тому +2

    my slogan: "It's hard to learn, have a confused day"

  • @codearmadillo
    @codearmadillo 2 роки тому +2

    std::cout > uses bitshift right. They are called Insertion operators.

  • @abdosoliman
    @abdosoliman 2 роки тому +3

    My favorite language of all time 😍😍😍. it's just so good when you actually use it properly. it will take quite a while to get there but god damn it's worth it

  • @a29stech33
    @a29stech33 2 роки тому +4

    Thanks,
    C/C++ will live forever!

  • @kelvinrawson1729
    @kelvinrawson1729 2 роки тому +1

    That was a cool video, now I'm waiting for C++ 20 in 100 sec ;)

  • @siddhantkhare2775
    @siddhantkhare2775 2 роки тому +1

    I wanted this video from you since 2-3 Months.....Thanks For Uploading.....
    Btw, Love from India Bro....🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @robert6315
    @robert6315 2 роки тому +4

    Your videos are amazing! Can you do a video on Solidity?

    • @klusmo
      @klusmo 2 роки тому +4

      there is already a 100 seconds on Solidity, and a few other videos on web3

    • @Luukth
      @Luukth 2 роки тому +1

      He made one already, check his channel!

    • @robert6315
      @robert6315 2 роки тому

      @@klusmo really? can you send me a link here

    • @robert6315
      @robert6315 2 роки тому

      nevermind i found it a while ago forgot to update the comment

  • @v00017
    @v00017 2 роки тому +18

    Using namespace std is something that will bite you eventually.
    Unique_ptr is a great idea but always prefer the std::make_unique initialization.

    • @blackfowl75
      @blackfowl75 2 роки тому

      Why should we use std::make_unique instead of a "normal" initialization?

    • @cptegonbr140
      @cptegonbr140 2 роки тому

      @@blackfowl75 it frees the memory when its not used anymore ( out of scope )

    • @v00017
      @v00017 2 роки тому

      @@blackfowl75 make_unique is more concise, avoiding repeating the type. It also safely handles exceptions where using `new` in the constructor may leak memory if an exception occurs.

    • @DFPercush
      @DFPercush 2 роки тому

      There are performance reasons as well. make_unique and make_shared construct the object in place, rather than creating a temporary object and then having to move or copy it. The arguments to make_shared are the same as the constructor for that class. This also applies to emplace_back and emplace_front in various containers, as opposed to push_back or push_front which will have to move/copy the object.
      smart pointers will still delete the memory if you assign a raw pointer to them, as they own that pointer now. But as Votlu points out, there might be a leak if there's an exception between your "new" and the return of make_unique. You also have to be sure you're not using that raw pointer any more after you give ownership to the smart pointer.

    • @valizeth4073
      @valizeth4073 2 роки тому

      @@cptegonbr140 That's not what make_unique does. The actual deletion of the resources is handled by the deleter you specify to the unique_ptr (which by default just invokes 'delete') in the destructor. make_unique is used for constructing a unique_ptr in an exception safe way.

  • @siddharthchhetry4218
    @siddharthchhetry4218 2 роки тому

    Since i understand little bit of c++ and c its has been fun to watch

  • @nopenot-happening9074
    @nopenot-happening9074 2 роки тому

    Just as I was wondering where this was! Nice

  • @jaymanx4life
    @jaymanx4life 2 роки тому +19

    Ah, C++. First love. Without it I don't know if I learned any other languages. That's not to say it's bad; it's a really good stepping stone for new coders.

  • @tannerted
    @tannerted 2 роки тому +127

    The statement that “Any valid C program is a valid C++ program” simply isn’t true. Many, but not all, things you do in C will work in C++. Also, don’t use “using namespace std” at the top of main. It is one of the cardinal sins of C++ development.

    • @FADHsquared
      @FADHsquared 2 роки тому +41

      I was looking for the "don't use `using namespace std`" comment, found it quick :P

    • @dderptrollz9073
      @dderptrollz9073 2 роки тому +2

      @@FADHsquared wait why tho

    • @jonatanlind5408
      @jonatanlind5408 2 роки тому +17

      @@dderptrollz9073
      It's called namespace pollution. In short if you create a function with the same name as any function inside the standard linbrary it will at worst call the standard library instead of your own code and at best fail to compile due to ambiguity.
      The fact that the best case is compilation failure should tell you that bugs due to this behaviour are a nightmare to debug.

    • @amyshaw893
      @amyshaw893 2 роки тому +1

      @@jonatanlind5408 surely if you want to using std, then just dont make any functions that have the same name as a std function? you could make that argument for any using library, which makes the whole "using" thing pointless?

    • @gigachad6844
      @gigachad6844 2 роки тому +1

      It is true, C++ is a superset of C

  • @alexawunor8853
    @alexawunor8853 2 роки тому

    Beautiful video 🙌🙌🙌

  • @festivebear9946
    @festivebear9946 Рік тому

    Really like your work man. Just took a course in C++ and this video really did good in condensing all that information and more. I was wondering though, what are you using to quickly fill in your code? I see you're not even typing, just stuff is appearing that seems faster than any ctrl+c ctrl+v I've seen.

  • @trofchik9488
    @trofchik9488 2 роки тому +24

    Ok, I have couple gripes with this video.
    1) Don't declare "using namespace std;" globally. It can cause ambiguities.
    2) std::unique_ptr doesn't do what you say. Firstly, raw pointer is simply a variable that contains address to data of a certain type. int*, for example, points to date with type of int, char* to data with type of char, etc... std::unique_ptr is a wrapper over raw pointer that is deallocated on stack (at the end of {} block). When end of the {} block is reached destructor of class std::unique_ptr is being called which in turn calls destructor of an object the std::unique_ptr pointer was pointing at. When it comes to raw pointer only the variable that contains the address would be deallocated while data at said address would remain with no reference to access it (provided that data was created with "new" and assigned to pointer or created outside of this {} block).
    Now think of ICopyable in C#. Now imagine that this property is explicitly deleted inside std::unique_ptr class. That means that the pointer can no longer be passed by copy into anything thus guaranteeing that one and only one reference to given piece of data exists. If you still want to pass it around you can use std::move but it will null the pointer at place where you passed it from.
    Alternatively if you want to pass pointer to data around you can use std::shared_ptr which again is wrapper over raw pointer but it can be copied and atomically counts the amount of references to data across the program. Once the count reaches zero data is being deallocated.

    • @andrewrichesson8627
      @andrewrichesson8627 2 роки тому

      And this is why c++ is so deadly. You miss any of those steps, and you get a memory leak.

    • @kaosce
      @kaosce 2 роки тому +5

      @@andrewrichesson8627 Not really in the case of smart pointers, it will just not work ^^

    • @valizeth4073
      @valizeth4073 2 роки тому

      @@andrewrichesson8627 If you code improperly, RAII makes it almost as easy to not get memory leaks as in a language with a garbage collector.

    • @climatechangedoesntbargain9140
      @climatechangedoesntbargain9140 2 роки тому

      @@valizeth4073 true, but you'll get a lot of dangling references anyway