DAVID CLOUGH ON KARL BARTH

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @bayreuth79
    @bayreuth79 15 років тому +4

    How did David Clough get on here? I was looking for audio clips of Karl Barth and I found this from my old lecturer. Good stuff. Thanks for the 74% for my dissertation!

  • @ButOneThingIsNeedful
    @ButOneThingIsNeedful 15 років тому +2

    I wish I could say I found this more helpful in getting to the essence of Barth.

  • @555pontifex
    @555pontifex 6 років тому +2

    I only clicked on this because I mistakenly thought it said BRIAN Clough on Karl Barth. I bet Cloughie would have had some spicy words about the German theologian.

  • @orangeiceice12
    @orangeiceice12 10 років тому +1

    Its very interesting that noted Zen personalities, names as big as DT Suzuki, supported the imperialist policies of Japan like the Russian Japanese war and aggression against China, even when called upon by western religious figures to come out in favor of peace or at least mercy.

    • @and1lnull
      @and1lnull Рік тому

      Incredibly disturbing, some of their accounts too...

  • @glwilsonus
    @glwilsonus 12 років тому

    MrRickywallace - you missed the point altogether. The ministers on the other side did the exact same thing. Culture was controling the churches. There was no foundation in God's revelation.

  • @ComradeAgopian
    @ComradeAgopian 12 років тому +2

    Culture was not ' controling Church ' , nor was ideology . Humans are products of our time and the socities we live in , however , that does not mean the revelation of God is absent .

  • @orangeiceice12
    @orangeiceice12 10 років тому

    +Richard Wallace Neither Barth nor Tillich did, the great conservative and great liberal theologians respectively of that time - also, modern day Brits are more closely descended from Hermann and the coastal saxons than modern Germans are

  • @StevenLascombe
    @StevenLascombe 6 років тому +3

    "HUuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh"

  • @frankem51
    @frankem51 Рік тому

    Sorry to be negative about Barth's negativity but he just seemed to be carving out a niche for himself in the arcane world of academic theology and so he has no relevance to those who look to religious thinkers to help them make sense of their spiritual experience

  • @ellese2845
    @ellese2845 4 роки тому +1

    Bruh

  • @nmrfilosofia-filosofia3396
    @nmrfilosofia-filosofia3396 11 років тому

    if you are interested in more information about the great theologian Paul Tillich, visit this link nmrfilosofia.wix.com/filosofia-nmr

  • @ashtonhirst3202
    @ashtonhirst3202 4 роки тому

    if you’re only here because your philosophy teacher has asked you to get an insight into Barth clap your hands 👏🏻👏🏻

  • @MrRickywallace
    @MrRickywallace 13 років тому

    Knowing that most of the German theologians supported the Kaiser shows us that the Hun is basically a violent creature, not a spiritual one, when it concerns nationalism. I was glad to hear this. So, it's not stereotyping of the Germans. Most Germans probably did support the two wars. America needs to remember this forever.

    • @frankdsouza2425
      @frankdsouza2425 4 роки тому +2

      That comment sounds more like GEORGE Wallace, young Richard. Or perhaps I have been exceptionally lucky with the many Germans I have been privileged to meet, here in li'l ole England.