Do We Need BR6 in Enlisted? • BR6 Proposal by Community • MeAdmiralStarks
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 гру 2024
- 🎙️ DISCORD - / discord
🐹 NEW MOUSE PAD OUT NOW! - admiralmerch.com/
😎 Become a channel Member - www.youtube.co...
💰 Tips/Donations - streamlabs.com...
✨ My TikTok page - tiktok.com/@realadmiralstarks
My Best Supporters:
❌❌❌❌❌All-Time Member Gifters Top✨
🎁psychobeam99 (215 Gifted)
🎁ReCaLa _69 (25 Gifted)
🎁Colin Ellingrod (25 gifted)
🎁dragons ltu (5 gifted)
❌❌❌❌❌ Super-chatters✨
🔊 psychobeam99
🔊 roliks Roliks
🔊 lego rocket league and more
🔊 Catamarascu Stefan
❌❌❌❌❌ Tip-Legends✨
💵psychobeam99
💵Arkhipich
•
✨ Official Enlisted Partner ✨ Enlisted CC ✨
•
•
EVA Gladitor is one of biggest complainers on the forum, his suggestions are always so dumb.
I wish they would have kept the campaign system… Regardless I think they should’ve just kept to having the factions “imbalanced”. What I mean is there is plenty of WW2 equipment for a country (that was actually used and given to troops) (in the case of Japan you’d probably need to do equipment that was made but not distributed, but things like the ho to are a joke), if it doesn’t have good tanks, can have AT weapons, planes, etc. to make up for it. Take for example the P47 vs. the Tiger II. They could add the Mosquito with a 57mm if they felt the tiger II is too overpowered. I loved this game become it was a cross between arcade and immersion. I think they are ruining the immersion. If they are going to go this route though. They definitely should apply this to every BR. I.E give the Germans bf109’s with rockets, Fw190’s with rockets, a Stuka with dual 37mm’s and a 250/500kg. One thing they could do is just have an option for experiment equipment or not, but that would fracture the player base.
I think every faction should have pros/cons - and this is coming from someone who enjoys playing all the factions equally
Balancing them our ruins unique faction flavor and creativity and frankly speaking no faction is stronger than the other, besides Japanese having really weak tanks and some planes in low br
I said it months ago that we need BR6 with a hard rule +-1 matchmaker in order to actually balance the game...
The powercrewp within BR5 is ridiculous! (smg vs AR, tanks vs OP tanks...) And BR4 facing BR'5' is pure insanity (how you deal with BR'5' tanks in your BR4 tank?)
We have horrible balance since the merge, and i tried to warn people about it AND post solutions in the forum, including BR6 and more BR balance changes (like M1C Garand downtiered to BR4) that are urgently needed...
But no... everyone is like "qUeuE tiMeS. muh... plAyEr cOuNt...eh" while also screaming about fantasy guns at BR5! And locking BR5 alone (like they suggest) will be worse for the MM than BR6 w +-1 MM...
Seriously, this game is long overdue for some balance changes... They jist slapped some weapons into absurd BR's and we haven't seen any BR change since the MP40 went BR2 bexlcause it was fighting in the old BR3-4-5 bracket Lol...
Highly agree with his suggestion. BR6 would make the game way more balanced
This is not a new proposal. This was already proposed Way back when Merge was still in the testing phase and BR was presented in its first iteration. Before BR Hardlock was even an option. By different forum goers
I think, it would be better to actually implement some kind of "Battle-Weight" per squad, i.e. a STG44 would be much more expensive than for example Kar98's, forcing player's to equip their soldiers with a with variety of different weapon tiers. It would add greatly to balance and diversity when people cannot run only full STG44 squads.
I suggested this last (A BR MM system that weighed the BR of every weapon you had) year when the merge was announced and i was screamed at for "min-maxing lunacy" and unbalanced/toxic mess...
Now these people are screaming about fantasy gun spam at BR'5' when they had shunned away any idea that would solve the spam problem (and kept variety and some resemblance of historical accuracy (mostly on squad loadouts)).
I thought I was the only person thinking about something like that. Imo every soldier, weapon, equipment piece and vehicle should have its "equip cost" and each br should have its "battle budget". Meaning that you can choose if you want a balanced loadout or some squads to be well equipped elite while others would be bare bones boltie equipped conscripts. It would add strategy to creating loadouts (other than throwing in most op shit available), add variety to games, since using anything but strongest heaviest thing would make sense, and add a great balancing tool since devs could manipulate power level by changing "equipment cost" rather than changing units in match performance
Also it could be a basis for historically accurate BR. BR could be made to be based solely upon time frame of weapon appearance, and it would be balanced by weapons relative cost. For example you could take PPSH-41 drum in a low br (early war) game but since battle budget would be much lower than in high BR it would be very costly forcing you to cut corners elsewhere, making using advanced stuff a high risk high reward play.
I think the reason that wouldn't work is that certain weapons would just have such a huge advantage over others if they don't get the ratios just right. Like if you had all BR1 equipment except for one guy in each squad with BR5 weapons, where does that land you? BR1 still? BR2, 3? On defense 1 guy with a BR5 weapon + an ammo box can potentially be a whole squad with that weapon if you keep picking it up and refilling it. Even the presence of one of those could decimate the other side if they're all equipped more normally.
@@AirLancer you may be right about that, certainly it would make game much more complex which isn't necessarily a good thing. On one hand loooting weapons being a big thing is very cool, but I see your point about infinitely picked up early war maxim tokarev not being the healthiest thing for the game. Maybe adding stuff like destruction of hand held weapons, or making ammo realistic (idk how many pouches you have, you are not running around with an mg and 400 rounds on your back) would mitigate it. I still would love to see changes like those I described before but I absolutely see your point.
We barely have current BRs populated. Makes no sense. I already play in 3+3 teams filled with bots
BR 4 to BR 5 jump is massive compared to all the other BR jumps I thought about a BR VI often myself but I haven't looked at any other proposals on how you could make BR IV More fun and competitive, honestly it always feels like I'm in a lobby with sweaters and I am at a huge disadvantage if I myself don't have BR V guns but have to play against them at BR IV
+1 -1 is better than a Tier VI introduction.
Hold my horses. Imho, it doesn't make sense. There should be a balance with what we already possess, such as ensuring that BR IV and V do not compete against lower BRs.
I’d personally be bringing out a BR similar to original MW1 call of duty verdansk with all the operators and guns we have now with rotating maps
It would be a nice idea to do it if we had enough players for every BR. Currently, we do not even have hard rule for BR 3, so this does not look like a good idea at this moment (and might never be, depending on online). Overall, I think a lot of stuff deserves BR6, it would also provide an opportunity to separate post-war/prototype stuff from everything else.
I would love for all post war/fake weapons to go to BR6 which would never mix with WW2 BR5: Hyde, AS, AutoHei, AS-44, T20, Fedorov, HoRi etc.
nah im not too sure that would be the best thing, not terrible but not great either, idk thats just my opinion, maybe rather actually make a hard rule for +1 -1, which would actually make br 3 and 4 worth playing. Idk just my opinion but its not a terrible idea, definately has a point. And actually now that i think about it it would be cool to have a high power battle rating that isnt filled up with the ever growing pile of prototype weapons that are being added to the game for top tier. So yeah also definately a cool idea
also id like to add that if they created a BR6 it would give DF much more freedom to add even more cool experimental and prototype guns and vehicles (tanks and planes) without much problem (backlash from history buffs that is), ofc if it can be balanced along with the other br 6 equippment
The only thing that can make BR4 actually worth it is the separation of BR'5' from BR5 aka decompression into BR6. BR4 already has a hard rule +-1 MM, BR3 is the one that lacks it... BR6 is necessary for proper balance of smg vs AR, semi rifle vs battle rifle and especially tanks, which suffer from compression the most.
Let BR6 to be the experimental AR cesspool while the gap between BR4 and 5 gets reasonable!
Wait are those EVA guys still in the game i thought they got banned after getting caught cheating during the first halloween event.
They were caught cheating ??
Lmfao. None of us have been banned for cheating 😂
Wait, why would the RD-44 (Maxed DPS 137, damage per belt 990) be BRVI but the Maxim Tokarev (Maxed DPS 145, DPB 1320) BRV at 10 meters? Also, in case someone's wondering, (maxed) MG15 is 290-990 and (also maxed) M1919A6 is 121-1320. Pretty sure MG15 is currently the highest DPM in the game. Correct me if I'm wrong tho.
MG15 is utter trash the MG34 with the 75 round drum is better.
@maineiacman Because of the sights I presume?
Rate of fire and sights.
@@maineiacmanMg15 has open AA sights versus the 75 patron 2 drums and rectangle sights blocking your screen
ROF i won’t argue on
and here i am in a t1 russians playing at BR5 with my 100 tommies squad and the rest bolt actions and being top of the team the majority of games xD, but dont worry, you are going to have BR 6, 7, 8 etc, cold war is coming along side modern tech like in WT, if you want to know how enlisted will look in a few years just look at WT, you will have tigers H fighting South African guided ATGMs like in WT, it may sound sad but thats where enlisted is going
It'd completely ruin the theming of the game if they add a ton of post-WW2 stuff. Such is the curse of any "live-service" game where you have to keep adding more and more and more.
@@AirLancer yeah it will, just like in WT, but is the only way for games that thrive on adding new stuff, soon we will see t54s facing tiger II lol
There is no point in creating a higher BR when you are currently matched with a higher rated BR. On the contrary, I think that reducing the number of BRs to 4, making matches between higher and lower rated players impossible, and adjusting the BRs of weapons more frequently is what is needed.
The problem should be that after BR 3 and 4, they exist only as fodder for BR 5.
I didn’t have a problem with campaigns swimming uphill when I started a new faction so when people put so much emphasis on ‘balance’ I feel like the old dude saying you kids don’t know how easy it is for you now in my day etc.
Id love seeing a early cold war weapons branch from br 6 and more.
That’s not a good idea tbh
Bc early Cold War weapons was ww2 weapons with stuff on it or caliber changes that’s it
Br6 would be nice if enlisted started adding cold war guns
Br 6 should come and help relieve the pressure off of br 3 and 4 and help enforce a br above and below which should be a thing already. Though only the big 3 America, Germany and Russia will have access to it with Japan being stuck at 5 due to the scarcity atm in the tech tree. But they also need to add Italy and Britain as their own tech trees.
The thing i dislike about BR 4 is that it's pointless because BR 5 exists. If BR 3 and 4 play together then it can make it worth playing like how you play BR 3. You might sometimes get up tiered but most of the time it's fair and balanced.
@Spykitty358 Depends on the faction. BR4 Soviets. Good. T-34-85 on up can kill every german tank if you know weak points. BR4 Germany. Good. Panzer IV G/J and Panthers can kill T-34-85 and higher if you know where to aim. BR4 USA and Japan. Oof. Struggles against both of the former. Ill say BR4 is CAPABLE of fighting 5, but yeah the suggested system would work better
@@psychobeam99 For me BR 4 Allies is quite good struggles with BR 5 Germany and Japan but overall is relatively equal with some exceptions like that anti-tank department where it’s weaker. But this is from my experiences I don’t play BR 4 that much but for the time I’ve played it’s relatively on par with each other.
@@tomcat6863 Yep
We need a 1 level BR matchmaking. A same br match would be nice
i think it can be done very easy, new ranks on new maps, until modern and ww1 maybe..
No BR 6 needed. We just need a +1 -1 BR system.
BR 4 to BR 5 jump is massive compared to all the other BR jumps
Or hear me out - you only face your BR.
Im going to say what i've been saying for a while. The battle rating system is terrible and serves to divide the playerbase further. We need an in match points economy with passive income and rewards for playing the objecctive, spottimg, etc. Your base squad is free the rest you play as by accumulating points. Even if you are a bad player you will eventually and passively get enough points to play all your squads just later rather than sooner. It will stop the tiger spam and incentivise teamwork.
Also BR system is no substitute for SBMM. An era system on top of my points system makes more sense. Early W, Mid W, Late W. So the bolt action enjoyers can still have their fill. The more expensive and op later wpns will make the squad more expensive in match and will make balancing easier overall compared to floundering between battle ratings and groups of players.
EVA is the most toxic clan, casually insulting players during matches.
This is not community proposal.
Plus the proposal is pretty dumb anyway.
We need ISU-152
hope Devs see this ♥
hell no..too many differences in balancing now
Br 6 isn’t worth the effort, there should be some flexibility in the quality of a Br’s weapons for purposes of making the game more variable. If they make it +-1, then Br 6 would not be needed, as the issue of a massive difference in quality of weapons would be resolved. This would lead to enough variation in quality in top tier to be noticeable but not inhibiting to players with lower quality high tier weapons. If Br 3 players want to get up-tiered they should just add a feature where you say you’re okay with a up-tier to Br 4-5 to cut down on queue times.
They should add me 262 in br 6 with rockets
Just go with +1/-1 mm. Problems solved.
I would say that br 6 should be superhavy tanks and extreme strong guns. but nothing witch is in the gaim untill now.
Radios call in V2s 😂
Further split up matchmaking? No thanks just give campaigns back in particular tunisa
I feel like if we do get a BV6 it's for like a new war ie we are going into the Korean War era
That being said honestly decoupling BV 4 from 5 would be rather wise as the gap from BV4 to BV5 is fucking ridiculous
Pls i dont know how to carry my ps4 account to pc pls someone help me
Sadly, it's not possible at this time.
Dont think it will work with how the game currently works and the amount of content would be spread thin across 5 and 6.
i think the current BRs are okay, just fill out the tiers with counters and equally powerful tools.
I think br6 is needed at this rate put guns like the automatic rifles and large cap smgs and 100 round Mags in its own tab so br4 load outs can be much more enjoyable
Plus the system can be much better when you can have 1-2 3-4 5-6
don't forget .. 2-3 and 4-5
@ and that I think this system would be better rounded than the current one at least
I just want new guns
need BR zero.
We dont need BR 6, what we need is British and Italian tech trees.
BrV is fine. Br3 just needs to be a separate matchmaking queue away from BR2 and 4. Jets and heavy tanks and TDs can be added to BR 5. The Ho Ri is already like a Jadgtiger or Ferdinand.
remove battle ratings completly
Yeah, let new players be farmer by BR 5 players!
That did really well for player retention before
@@abotaccount6094 is how i came up *spits into a bucket* by way of RO2 by way of RS2 i miss seeing br1 tactics in the field, at tier five its all the same build kinda boring. i want to see a random BR flame tank rush the point before AT can counter.
I also miss original cool down for radio man artillery. nonstop exlplosions
@@jod5861 hell yeah, can't wait for königstiger to become only viable tank in the entire game instead of only in BR V.
Best if they remove squads, and make game more like Battlefield or Isonzo.
Allies get there fist armored tank now u want a br6 lol