Detailed Look At The New "Advanced HUD" Option | 4.0 ePTU Update - Dec 5th, 2024

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 315

  • @darcywright8777
    @darcywright8777 10 днів тому +99

    some of this looks very familiar... almost like we've had features like this before...

    • @ShaoruneXYZ
      @ShaoruneXYZ 9 днів тому +1

      same. if I remember 3.17 or older

    • @1aatlas
      @1aatlas 9 днів тому +2

      obviously they didnt get it finished in time for release and now are adding it back not its complete.

    • @amineabdz
      @amineabdz 9 днів тому +9

      I don't care to diss them on this, it was good, they removed it, realized it was actually a good system, then introduced it back using building blocks instead of flash

    • @Stigly
      @Stigly 9 днів тому +1

      Its better than what it was now. I dont care l. Now we just have more options. 🎉

    • @malooly
      @malooly 9 днів тому +1

      @@amineabdz yeah a nice move. Wild it was still using flash.

  • @Rat_Poobrain
    @Rat_Poobrain 10 днів тому +104

    So they essentially brought back the old HUD and called it the Advanced HUD now? Thank God. I was getting so sick of the new one. This is actually such a nice addition.

    • @Billy-bc8pk
      @Billy-bc8pk 10 днів тому +22

      The old HUD was built on different tech, the new HUD is built on new tech, so it stands to reason they would bring back a lot of the old features that worked but running on the new tech.

    • @MrSpy13011
      @MrSpy13011 10 днів тому +4

      @@Billy-bc8pk It still tanks my fps so its all the same to me lmao.

    • @kemical37
      @kemical37 10 днів тому

      you're not alone

    • @stuartriddell2461
      @stuartriddell2461 10 днів тому +6

      I prefer the minimalistic HUD. it's great that we can can choose what we want.

    • @ScientistMan96
      @ScientistMan96 10 днів тому +3

      I also like that we get options now. Dashboard for the out of the way HUD style, advanced HUD for the in your face style. Both have their perks, and both have all the same info, just in different layouts.
      The dashboard style is really great for cargo/touring/exploration piloting, as it allows access to all the needed flight info, but in a way that doesn't obstruct your views out the window at all. Makes flying look nicer, and can be better for more relaxed, casual flights. It's also a lot closer to how IRL civilian cockpits are laid out, with most/all info being on MFDs and various dials and screens around the dash rather than projected on a HUD.
      The "Advanced" style is more akin to modern military HUD, sacrificing your clear view for much more direct access to all your flight info in one central place. Makes your vision more crowded, but means you don't have to dart your eyes all over the dashboard in a high performance situation like combat or racing.

  • @metalmeltdown31
    @metalmeltdown31 10 днів тому +64

    "Babe, wake up. New Foxy patch breakdown just dropped!"

    • @schlagzahne6741
      @schlagzahne6741 9 днів тому +1

      You would never get any sleep if you had to wake up for every foxy upload. It happens so often

  • @davidos1335
    @davidos1335 9 днів тому +39

    They need to add indicator for lights i can’t never tell when they are on or off

    • @gravity00x
      @gravity00x 9 днів тому +2

      cig: just listen to thr sound!!!!!
      brkkz means on and brrkz means off.
      isnt that obvious?!?!!?

    • @davidos1335
      @davidos1335 9 днів тому

      @ haha that’s a good one but dear cig im deaf so i need that indicator

    • @Power5
      @Power5 9 днів тому

      Could actually make lights that light up more than 1M in front of ship. That would make sense for a ship that travels at speeds in the hundreds of m/s at distances far longer than 100M from the pitch black space station.

  • @Blindfire201
    @Blindfire201 10 днів тому +30

    no headlight symbol? sad

  • @MineyM0
    @MineyM0 10 днів тому +19

    I hope we have an option to restock only ballistic ammo. I can see a problem of not being able to restock anything if the prices are too high

    • @dpawtows
      @dpawtows 9 днів тому +2

      If you remove a depleted ballistic weapon from a ship and put it on another.... does it remember it was empty?

    • @sinisadovijanic
      @sinisadovijanic 9 днів тому +4

      they should give you choice to restock every weapon separately. if the complicate this waythen that will be a small pick

  • @byrey3
    @byrey3 10 днів тому +38

    I swear the best state of the game was when weapons in gunracks were claimabled through insurance aswell, and your ships felt alive.
    It too made it less frustating to die for random things and all the pain this game is

    • @KiithnarasAshaa
      @KiithnarasAshaa 9 днів тому +11

      But don't you love Tarkov in Space? Isn't that what people asked for?! (No one asked for this)

    • @ChristoffRevan
      @ChristoffRevan 9 днів тому +3

      @@KiithnarasAshaa Dude, you need to just stop. In the future with physicalised damage (Maelstrom), ships aren't really going to be blowing up that much...they will become disabled (and large/capital ships will almost NEVER be blown up). Also, there's going to be insurance for literally every kind of item in the game pretty much, so if you lose something...no big deal, just pay a relatively small fee and you'll get it back (at least, less than what you would normally have paid to get it back full price).
      Also, once we get the full security system for star systems in the future, high security star systems won't have violence nor PvP, so yes...there WILL be safe areas AS INTENDED and what a lot of people want. Stop being ignorant, makes you look like you did zero research on the game. Like, I understand being impatient and all...I think we all are...but there's a difference between what we have NOW, and what CIG is planning for the FUTURE...which are drastically different.

    • @alexc9434
      @alexc9434 9 днів тому +9

      @@ChristoffRevanthere’s a lot of “in the future it will going to be”… I don’t care what and IF it’s going to be that way. I want it the way it was already when I had fun playing. The game sucks now with these horrible master modes and all these features that make no sense.

    • @Stigly
      @Stigly 9 днів тому

      You should've never played this as you would've a released game. Expecting to have fun. The fun you had was coincidental. SC is not fun, it is potential fun. I dont understand how people can keep forgetting this. I love SC, but play it 6 hours a month max. Thats how to cope.

    • @Luka_Pix
      @Luka_Pix 9 днів тому

      Want that back too

  • @Hurric4ne_
    @Hurric4ne_ 9 днів тому +8

    So right now, CIGs idea of missiles/torps rearming is to buy dozens/hundreds of them and when you're dry, land in your Hangar, store the ship, restock via the Loadout Manager, retrieve the ship again, and fly out.
    Okay...

    • @Dana-Xue
      @Dana-Xue 9 днів тому +2

      As foxy said I think it's a bug that you can't restock when landed normally, and I think you can restock missles and Torpedos physically without the loadout manager. however the price increase is also a big yikes for me becouse CIG clearly doesn't know how an economy works. If a few Chaffs and decoys are like 9k I'm feared for everything.
      They overtune it in Al the wrong directions

    • @lordfraybin
      @lordfraybin 9 днів тому +1

      No - You're supposed to be able to re-arm, repair and refuel at the pad.
      That function has NOT been working reliably since the old shipyards/fuel depots were removed.

    • @billcortani75
      @billcortani75 7 днів тому

      If they continue in the economy model they seem to be pushing, either no one's going to enjoy fps ship combat or just more ppl will go to ebay to get their auec...silly push if you ask me.

  • @blamsmith
    @blamsmith 9 днів тому +3

    Thank christ we have a useable HUD back! Thanks for sharing fella!

  • @theMedicatedCitizen
    @theMedicatedCitizen 9 днів тому +6

    That BIS skin for the Eclipse is drop dead gorgeous

    • @n1c2c8
      @n1c2c8 9 днів тому +1

      saddened i didn’t start getting into SC in earnest 1-2 years after this BIS. Despite being an original 2012 KS backer.

  • @kilozulu2413
    @kilozulu2413 10 днів тому +9

    Does this mean that they also fixed missiles/torpedo locks? 75% of my missiles that are locked on targets still sail off without ever tracking their target.

    • @christopherjohnson2171
      @christopherjohnson2171 10 днів тому

      None of my vanguards can even get locks with s3 or the s5 torpedoes currently.

    • @Lauersau
      @Lauersau 9 днів тому

      You need to wait until the voice says „target locked“

    • @kilozulu2413
      @kilozulu2413 9 днів тому +1

      @@Lauersau You need to work on reading comprehension.

    • @Lauersau
      @Lauersau 9 днів тому +1

      @@kilozulu2413 no offensive intended from my side… sometimes it take long time to lock on. But, I know that the size 3 assailant missile does not lock on targets at all

    • @christopherjohnson2171
      @christopherjohnson2171 9 днів тому

      @@Lauersau that's the issue, that voice never comes sometimes. I can only get it on S2 missiles on my Vanguards right now.

  • @jimrussell4062
    @jimrussell4062 10 днів тому +22

    Definite HUD improvement. Those are very important things you should know about your ship and not have to cycle through screens and look down.

    • @poki.1337
      @poki.1337 10 днів тому

      Yeah true but not quantum fuel or other stuff like flairs, this is way to much and doubled

  • @johnnytrongaming
    @johnnytrongaming 10 днів тому +11

    You do more for the SC UA-cam community than any other UA-camr, thank you 🙏🏾.

    • @gravity00x
      @gravity00x 9 днів тому +4

      Truly! He never shugarcoats or overhypes anything, gives praise, when praise is due, never overly negative, always informative and in the first place FOR the player instead just in it for themselves to get that CiG bootlicker paycheck.
      There is no other SC youtuber like him indeed.
      Thank you Captain Foxyloxy

  • @EvernightRyder
    @EvernightRyder 10 днів тому +20

    9k for flares is nuts

    • @Fragnatix
      @Fragnatix 10 днів тому +1

      Its pyro, mabye its less in stanton

    • @EvernightRyder
      @EvernightRyder 10 днів тому +1

      @ that would make sense for things to cost more in pyro

    • @moebeans72
      @moebeans72 6 днів тому

      I’m just blowing up from now on

  • @Ryecrash617
    @Ryecrash617 9 днів тому +6

    So the "Advanced Hud" is our "Old Hud?" Good to know we're going backwards. Perhaps the next concept ship will have sails.

    • @CaspersGhost618
      @CaspersGhost618 9 днів тому

      😂

    • @amineabdz
      @amineabdz 9 днів тому +4

      the new HUD WAS the regression, we finally are going back to a good system that worked, also now using building blocks so it might not tank fps as much.
      Now let's hope they do the same to MM and the arbitrary low SCM speeds

    • @ictr3ma255
      @ictr3ma255 9 днів тому

      @@amineabdz now we need old 3D pips back

    • @Power5
      @Power5 9 днів тому

      @@ictr3ma255 I am not picturing what a 3D pip looked used to look like. I do not remember them or they were so obviously expected that I did not have to consider them out of the ordinary.

  • @flamebreakk
    @flamebreakk 10 днів тому +4

    WHERE is the option to turn off the blindingly bright interior lighting of the eclipse? The glaring lights that wash out every HUD, the construction site grade overhead lighting?! I really don't like driving with all of my car's internal lights on at night, and I don't like flying that way even more!

  • @dashbolt101s
    @dashbolt101s 9 днів тому +16

    This is such a great addition. This is the perfect way to please everyone. I like the new one better to have my view clearer, but I'm glad they did this !

  • @elkneto4334
    @elkneto4334 9 днів тому +6

    and tadaa... i cant keep on my chair laughing all of a sudden... ITS THE OLD UI

    • @FalconDS9
      @FalconDS9 9 днів тому +1

      u are aware that this is a completely new UI system, right? they just re-created the old stuff but its all modular now. thats why we can toggle certain parts and they can add or change pieces when needed. means, it might look like the old ui, but its already alot better and they can make it better at any time now..

    • @ictr3ma255
      @ictr3ma255 9 днів тому

      @@FalconDS9 so we can disable useless Gforce indication, or drift direction? doesnt seem like there was an option for that

    • @FalconDS9
      @FalconDS9 8 днів тому

      @@ictr3ma255 they can add any option we want. thats the beauty of this new hud on building blocks.
      IF and WHEN are totally diffrent questions, but its possible.

  • @AyatollahofRocknRola
    @AyatollahofRocknRola 10 днів тому +2

    Omg yes, yeeesss huddd, I have missed you so much! Now if we could just add more struts....

  • @stoneguard
    @stoneguard 9 днів тому

    I really hope CIG is subscribed to your channel. You’d be the easiest go-to external QA to verify their fixes! Also if you are confused by something they should assume a lot of people are.
    I like the new (old) HUD for the most part, glad to get a lot of that functionality back. Wish they’d replace some of those icons with words instead of icons that are confusing at a glance.

  • @Fragnatix
    @Fragnatix 10 днів тому +8

    Overweight seems to say we might have mass reaction soon where ships dont float anymore in atmo lol

    • @mndeg
      @mndeg 9 днів тому

      what if you actually have to care about the mass of your cargo O_O

  • @durtyred86
    @durtyred86 10 днів тому +23

    You know what stuck out to me here?
    That overweight sign.... The game is about to change, boys.. Now is a good time to rethink the idea of judt cramming boxes into a ship without a second thought.
    Idk if it'll keep your ship grounded, or if it'll cause you to have to divert alot of resources to the engine to run it, possibly at the cost of shields, weapons and other power pullers... Things just got VERY interesting.. 🤔

    • @alexpetrov8871
      @alexpetrov8871 10 днів тому

      This is just an icon, it means nothing. Overweight may be as well another "ramming blades" feature, which exists about 8 years in not implemented state.

    • @durtyred86
      @durtyred86 10 днів тому +9

      @alexpetrov8871 whatever makes you comfortable i guess. For everyone else, they know what it means...

    • @alexpetrov8871
      @alexpetrov8871 10 днів тому

      @@durtyred86 whatever makes you comfortable i guess. For everyone else, they know this icon means nothing...

    • @seldogrif9732
      @seldogrif9732 10 днів тому +9

      I think Olii had a case that his Hull C fully loaded started dropping like a rock upon entering the atmosphere, which was not the case a few patches ago. So I guess they are working on this to an extent

    • @AlexysRM
      @AlexysRM 10 днів тому +2

      @@alexpetrov8871 You can't really compare a feature that was thought up when the entire game was basically still just a concept to something that's being implemented after the devs already have a solid idea of how they want the game to feel.
      It's like with the reclaimer claw. They dreamed that up many years before salvaging, maelstrom, or any of these other gameplay mechanics were actually a thing. So they had to turn it into a straw instead.
      There's a huge difference between something that was thought up 8 or 10 years ago and something that's being designed right now.

  • @MrThoughts101
    @MrThoughts101 9 днів тому

    Really appreciate the breakdown and I love this direction. Good work CIG

  • @Meiershans
    @Meiershans 10 днів тому +22

    next patch the ships get delivered without fuel and you need to pay for it too xD

    • @aithemed
      @aithemed 10 днів тому

      Yes! Make it happen

    • @Squidbush8563
      @Squidbush8563 10 днів тому +3

      or internal components or guns

    • @ChristoffRevan
      @ChristoffRevan 9 днів тому

      @@Squidbush8563 Stop being hyperbolic people...do you people really want SC to remain an alpha permanently? Well, moneysinks are part of making a game and actual game with, you know...BALANCE and CONSEQUENCES. Obviously though, that means we need stability and better performance, so...I get why you people are annoyed, but at some point CIG have to make SC as the game they WANT it to be, as opposed to making things based on the limited, current realities. Do you want a forever alpha, or an actual game? Because I know I want an actual game

    • @Squidbush8563
      @Squidbush8563 9 днів тому +2

      @@ChristoffRevan Sarcasm isn't hyperbole 🙄

    • @Stormyy6310
      @Stormyy6310 9 днів тому +2

      @@ChristoffRevan All good till you have to pay almost half a million to get a single size 10 torpedo back... You see the problem with making stuff like this (trying to make an economy) is that you need to balance things *before* making the economy, for example somthing that is underpowered and puts you at a disadvantage should not be extremely expensive to do (multicrew), that's the whole problem with SC, very few things are introduced in a coherent way.
      For example I can assure you exactly nobody will use torps that cost over a million each and rarely even reach their target, there is not a single mission in the game that justifies using even a single torpedo, this is what I'm talking about, before attempting to balance an economy you need to balance the gameplay and idk maybe your own game somtimes

  • @zerentheunskilled
    @zerentheunskilled 10 днів тому +2

    Oh nice! That new hud is a welcome change.

  • @CornOnTheCop
    @CornOnTheCop 10 днів тому +5

    CIG needs to drop the costs of missiles, torps, bombs, and ammo until the economy in SC is more developed and viable, and also, when the is more stable. People are going to lose their ships all the time. This F'ing game is a HUGE time-sink. People who hate being space truckers are going to have to farm constantly or actually become space truckers to make enough credits to keep their ships, especially large ships and Capitol ships armed. I think I am finally starting to regret spending so much money to back this game. If they remove so.e of time-sinks maybe it would be so bad. I don't want to spend 12 hours a day just to get something done

    • @Billy-bc8pk
      @Billy-bc8pk 10 днів тому +2

      The economy is literally coming in 4.0; that's why it's getting a full wipe so they can test the economy balance and start feeding the data into StarSim so the dynamic economy can start taking over. If they don't start testing now, then when?

    • @classicmac8986
      @classicmac8986 10 днів тому +3

      Agree, as long as my polaris blows up by accidentally slowly ramming a pisces while docking they must keep the insurance claim as it is now. It can not be that due to a bug i loose my ship and have to pay to completely restock it again. And since all missions pay like complete shit in comparison to what restocking a polaris costs its a huge joke.

    • @CornOnTheCop
      @CornOnTheCop 10 днів тому +5

      @Billy-bc8pk That is a good point, but what about game instability? I lost count of how many times I've to claim a ship due to losing it from game crashes, unexplained ship explosions, and other bugs. I've been a backer since 2013, and I won't repeat how much I have spent to back this game because I am a bit embarrassed about it, LOL. But, the fact CIG is trying to make every single aspect of this game as realistic as possible has created many annoying time sinks, and it's just getting worse. I am very worried about the game feeling like work, instead of a game.
      But as for ammo prices, I just don't think they should raise the prices so much until the servers and the game are stable. It is my opinion that balancing the economy should later when they are much closer to 1.0. There is still too much missing from the game, and adjusting prices on stuff is easy enough for the devs at a later time.
      Cheers my friend. 🍺🍺

    • @Billy-bc8pk
      @Billy-bc8pk 10 днів тому +1

      @@CornOnTheCop Yes, I understand your point, but they are looking to bring StarSim online with the 4.0 branch, so they kind of need to start honing in on those data points now. I can understand the frustration of bugs, desync, and glitches, but they kind of have to start somewhere with getting those baselines set well ahead of 1.0 so they have a good, stable, dynamic economy for launch.

  • @friendlyspacedragon7250
    @friendlyspacedragon7250 9 днів тому +1

    The rearming now needs the ability to select what we want to rearm. No need to rearm the expensive missiles if you don't use them and the ship is going to bug out sooner or later anyway. Especially on ships with large stores of missiles like the Andromeda.

  • @renegadeceo
    @renegadeceo 10 днів тому

    You should check if you can restock your missiles/torps if you have some in the station's inventory where you are trying to restock.
    It would make the most sense that you would be required to have missiles either on hand (in station inventory), and just pay a small amount to have them installed. or be at a station with a shop that sells the type you have setup in the ship loadout where you are essentially buying the torps and paying the install fee at the pad.
    If push comes to shove, you can bring torps to a station and manually reload them in your hangar :\

  • @JimCook
    @JimCook 7 днів тому

    I have always loved that skin on the Eclipse.

  • @merclord
    @merclord 9 днів тому

    This is just awesome. We should have had this a long time ago, but I guess it took them awhile to get into building blocks.

  • @zeta4687
    @zeta4687 10 днів тому

    i'm glad finally someone in cig know how hud should look

  • @ahumeniy
    @ahumeniy 9 днів тому

    I wonder if the overweight indicator appears when you load the MPUV Tractor because right now, it can't take off when fully loaded

  • @MikeB-ng3ol
    @MikeB-ng3ol 9 днів тому

    I like that they gave us our HUD back. Great update on that part.

  • @Baleur
    @Baleur 9 днів тому +1

    If they reduce PDC accuracy by 50%, this makes sense. (To remove torpedoes)
    If they dont, well enjoy spending a volley of 4 S10 torps at an Idris to get 1 hit (if you are extremely lucky) and take down its health by 10%..
    For 3.6 million UEC per 10% idris health removed.

  • @Mr1FTW
    @Mr1FTW 9 днів тому

    Just love this - so easier to read info. Will the information be in the exact same place for any ship?
    But would prefer "landing gear successfully deployed" show as green, not red - since that normally means it does not work.

  • @RobertVignone
    @RobertVignone 9 днів тому +1

    Seeing exit Zero G pop up ever 2 seconds freaks me out. That needs to go now.

    • @CathrineMacNiel
      @CathrineMacNiel 9 днів тому +1

      Don't you wish to answer the Call of the Void? :D

    • @joshua41175
      @joshua41175 9 днів тому

      It's especially annoying in the polaris and corsair because the power off buttons are next to mfd arrows. They really need to tighten up the areas that pop up these buttons up into the selectable.

  • @Taztorien
    @Taztorien 9 днів тому

    are the missile not in the your inventory your local?

  • @1nc0gn3to1
    @1nc0gn3to1 9 днів тому

    Why is there no keybind for this and any of the new functions like deplor armour shielding????

  • @snowmind
    @snowmind 9 днів тому +1

    FoxyLoxy, renowned torpedo black marketeer! Cheeky!

  • @tarran6176
    @tarran6176 10 днів тому +2

    What if I never shot any? Do I lose them ?

  • @Jeremy_Walker
    @Jeremy_Walker 10 днів тому +8

    Just adjust the claim price based on loadout

    • @alexpetrov8871
      @alexpetrov8871 10 днів тому +2

      yea, and then you'll have 28x400K=11mil claim price for Polaris, nice

    • @Jeremy_Walker
      @Jeremy_Walker 10 днів тому

      Don’t shoot sh*t you can’t afford lol

    • @ictr3ma255
      @ictr3ma255 9 днів тому

      @@alexpetrov8871 maybe then... add two buttons? claim with ammo or claim just the ship?

  • @louieavi
    @louieavi 9 днів тому

    HUGE kudos to CIG for giving us back our hud. Now if we can get it to defaul.

  • @sevilnatas
    @sevilnatas 9 днів тому

    I have been having ptoblems withmy altimeter disappearing from my HUD. After a while it disappears and it never comes back until I claim the ship.

  • @GlennLMS
    @GlennLMS 9 днів тому

    How do I switch between the different sub-modes of NAV (SCN, QT and FLT)? And GUN, MIS and SCN mode of SCM?

  • @JesseHiraya
    @JesseHiraya 9 днів тому

    Overweight as a feature is something I know already exists with the hull c with a full load of cargo.
    On its own, the hull c can land and take off from a planet.
    Once you are fully loaded, no amount of boost or thrusters can stop a hull c from hitting the ground if it enters the atmosphere. Hence why the hull c is only meant to do cargo in space.
    So maybe this icon will come up in this kind of scenario now.

  • @Magtaius
    @Magtaius 9 днів тому

    Would you be able to share the picture of the advanced HUD icons with the description for each symbol that you showed?

  • @damaddmann
    @damaddmann 9 днів тому

    Thanks for all you hard work

  • @impressivevee3830
    @impressivevee3830 9 днів тому

    Finally some good UI, now I don’t need to spend hours at drake ships looking for boost indicators or speed limits, next one - UI at centre, that shows enemy ships around you - time to make it work again

  • @TaldrenDR
    @TaldrenDR 10 днів тому

    Thin bar is acceleration vector, thick bar is velocity vector

  • @DjNorad
    @DjNorad 9 днів тому

    how does the adv hud look on planets and with hopefully an altimeter in view?

  • @srrandom23
    @srrandom23 9 днів тому

    How to stack the flares?

  • @mliekseter
    @mliekseter 9 днів тому

    I hope we get options to hide or move specific hud elements soon

  • @NCC3818E
    @NCC3818E 9 днів тому

    at 2:12 was your hydrogen fuel being used just from being on is that finally a thing?

  • @Patch1xo
    @Patch1xo 10 днів тому

    Absolutely Love this!

  • @outlawjaw1639
    @outlawjaw1639 9 днів тому

    Can you try buying a missile from a weapons shop and then equipping it through mobiglass?

  • @CitizenTechTalk
    @CitizenTechTalk 9 днів тому

    Omg this is awesome!!! Finally!!! It's just a pity about the torpedo bug is all.

  • @TheJZP
    @TheJZP 9 днів тому

    "This function is currently broken" sums up star citizen

  • @eatthedead1ify
    @eatthedead1ify 9 днів тому

    does the station you tried rearming at actually offer rearm services at all? asking cause i have away for work and unable to play SC or watch videos :)

  • @cpt_kenzo
    @cpt_kenzo 9 днів тому

    Have the fixed the altimeter?

  • @AngelicStreak
    @AngelicStreak 9 днів тому

    What is the name of the cool white Eclipse skin please?

  • @BR1ZZO
    @BR1ZZO 10 днів тому +1

    Cleaned up old hud, they are learning from the MM mistakes for sure its just gonna take a bit to get ot back.

  • @ChannelHandlePending
    @ChannelHandlePending 9 днів тому

    So if the "advanced" hud is just the old one we had, does that mean we could get an "advanced" flight model that is also just the old one that MM took away?

  • @coldReactive
    @coldReactive 9 днів тому

    Last I checked, ships don't reset between PTU Patches unless they explicitly say so. It's likely the ship is being counted as being already first spawned from a previous 4.0 PTU.

  • @cookiebandit101
    @cookiebandit101 9 днів тому

    Its the same bug that happens when you use up your missiles and re arm wont work and you store the ship and open the loadout. The missile slots are just blank

  • @boxofcannons600
    @boxofcannons600 9 днів тому

    A full stock of air. Then they change you 9k for 3 flairs. 3k a flair is pretty expensive. I like the accessibility of all the information on the new hud.

  • @roninspoon3935
    @roninspoon3935 9 днів тому

    The white and gold livery on the eclipse is sick.

  • @vassonly
    @vassonly 10 днів тому +2

    Did you check if they were unequipped in the ship loadout?

  • @xXE4GLEyEXx
    @xXE4GLEyEXx 10 днів тому +9

    Very important fix from CIG to fuck up ships with torps... Slow clap.

    • @XShadowAngel
      @XShadowAngel 10 днів тому +7

      Please. If you thought it was intentional gameplay to get all the torps/bombs back for free on a reclaim, you were being delusional.

    • @scrap_er
      @scrap_er 10 днів тому +6

      ​@@XShadowAngel bro its the main weapon of the ship. In this case every other ship should spawn with 0 guns and 0 ammo to be fair

    • @XShadowAngel
      @XShadowAngel 10 днів тому +4

      @@scrap_er Bro, they literally have made very clear MANY times that things like that were going to need to be purchased. And it's not the only weapon, regardless. If you thought those expensive torps were going to be free forever, that's crazy. Literally everyone knew it was a workaround to the point that it's literally jokingly called insurance fraud.

    • @Billy-bc8pk
      @Billy-bc8pk 10 днів тому +1

      @@XShadowAngel Yup. And they said there will be loops themed around insurance fraud and preventing it.

    • @scrap_er
      @scrap_er 10 днів тому +3

      @XShadowAngel during citcon they said that insurance would give back the ship WITH THE BASE WEAPONS not HALF OF IT

  • @nickstinger4709
    @nickstinger4709 9 днів тому

    What is a good way for a new player to learn how to fire missiles or drop bombs?

    • @FalconDS9
      @FalconDS9 9 днів тому

      with the current price changes, missiles and bombs are not something a new player should use, ever. cant afford that, not even with extended game knowledge..

  • @cssvi01
    @cssvi01 9 днів тому

    if we had an alternative (crafting) this change would be okay, but at least for now while we dont have crafting the prices are a touch high. They should be cut in half in price. Just torps, rockets/missiles are okay imo.

  • @kaiberuss
    @kaiberuss 9 днів тому

    so wait you cant rearm torps or missiles on a pad or hangar or was this a bug? or do you need to manually rearm torps and shit

  • @youtried3284
    @youtried3284 9 днів тому +1

    so long as i can continue to restock missiles via the ship rearm i dont care i just dont wanna have to fly all the way to random places to get more missiles because everus or seraphim doesnt sell them especially with how annoying it is to haul them in bulk

  • @rinkaemina
    @rinkaemina 10 днів тому

    thank you for the information

  • @Michael-CS
    @Michael-CS 9 днів тому

    I think Tuesday was December 3rd and Thursday was December 5th cause today is Friday it's December 6th?

  • @GrimGatsby
    @GrimGatsby 9 днів тому

    Just need the ol check engine light and we're all set!

    • @stratfol1
      @stratfol1 7 годин тому

      Pls no, I can totally see Chris adding service intervals for regular maintenence and mechanic gameplay to give engineers something to do xD

  • @HelloSquiggles
    @HelloSquiggles 6 днів тому

    Unrelated, but one thing I really don't like about the Eclipse is how it is treated like a fighter from the cockpit standpoint, especially since its design looks to be heavily influenced by a B-2 or other bombers. Really wish it had some kind of intererior.

  • @szymonlaskowski166
    @szymonlaskowski166 9 днів тому

    Overweight is maybe when you put to many staff on your ship?

  • @4jup4ter4
    @4jup4ter4 10 днів тому +4

    ahhh the money sinks begin. I bet the overweight thing is in reference to cargo and Weight and Balance

    • @callsigngrimdoll
      @callsigngrimdoll 10 днів тому +1

      It's called balance.

    • @the_babbleboom
      @the_babbleboom 10 днів тому +1

      next up they will sell you auec on the store page.

    • @scrap_er
      @scrap_er 10 днів тому +2

      Its not balanced that only the torpedo boats spawn spawn without weapons. To be balanced, all ships should spawn with no weapons at all.. ​@@callsigngrimdoll

    • @deathslide8
      @deathslide8 10 днів тому +2

      @@the_babbleboom they've been selling uec since 2018 (probably before but i don't know that for certain).

    • @callsigngrimdoll
      @callsigngrimdoll 10 днів тому +4

      @@scrap_er It's to stop the dupe of not having to pay for torpedoes for a capital ship. Yes, it's balance. Torps not respawning when you go to repair is a bug. But yes you should have to pay for one of the most powerful damage dealers in the game rather than just abandoning your ship to avoid paying for them.

  • @kyefrancis
    @kyefrancis 9 днів тому +2

    As long as when we claim we get the missiles that were not fired back. Hate to lose millions because the hanger doors looked clear, ship phased through the panet or an asteroid dident render.
    And manual restocking choices

  • @Gofr5
    @Gofr5 9 днів тому

    Thst's a pretty interesting new HUD. Nice.

  • @nikoulph
    @nikoulph 9 днів тому

    Nice touch the new MFD, tnx CIG ❤
    CIG can fight insurance fraud when the game will be stable and running good.
    But if they implement insurance fraud policies right now, bugs game instability, server crapping players gameplay... Well it will make the game impossible.

  • @Golyem
    @Golyem 9 днів тому +1

    12 years and they still try to push hollywood bullcrap visuals into a game people need to USE the HUD interface not just look at it for 3 seconds on the screen. Should never use icons where text indicators are better. Little glyph of landing gear or gsafe requires brain to decode the shape and then interpret the meaning while text is instant. They also made those glyphs MOVE in a rotation as you turn them on or off which will cause issues using them in stressful situations.
    Finally, once again, they forgot to put the acceleration limiter setting indicator.

  • @dustin0133
    @dustin0133 10 днів тому +1

    Why tf would anyone want to take away the holographic hud elements they’re like the primary things lmao

    • @FalconDS9
      @FalconDS9 9 днів тому

      looks like we are supposed to choose, advanced or the other one. but not both at the same time.

  • @h.y-chen
    @h.y-chen 9 днів тому

    no ammo/overheat still? wtf cig

  • @DanTheMan-n5p
    @DanTheMan-n5p 9 днів тому

    I feel like the advanced hud is just returning back to the old hud. Much of that info is already displayed on the mfds and dash

  • @TheWhiteRat1
    @TheWhiteRat1 9 днів тому

    Very interesting video.

  • @mateusvitoriano6257
    @mateusvitoriano6257 9 днів тому +1

    I found the new hub very visually polluted. The mechanics are good but I like a minimalist screen to have a good view of the outside without visual pollution

  • @UmbraAtrox_
    @UmbraAtrox_ 9 днів тому

    Overweight symbol would have helped with Argo mpvu tractor. That thing can lift exactly nothing in gravity. Was sitting there wondering why it wouldn't lift off until i removed some boxes.

  • @Guap426
    @Guap426 9 днів тому

    The UI improvement is great but the missle update idk what CIG was thinking. The restock price is too high. Given how unreliable missles are , the new PDC systems, and mainly the rate at which you can earn money. 14 million to restock a polaris is insane

  • @kal-nor
    @kal-nor 9 днів тому

    I like these changes 👌

  • @nashlos4519
    @nashlos4519 9 днів тому

    Thank you!

  • @tylertiffin9067
    @tylertiffin9067 9 днів тому

    If I'm not doing combat i actually like the hud we have now. Nothing blocking my view

  • @bighit20100
    @bighit20100 9 днів тому

    So you are saying that if the game bugs out and i need to reclaim the Polaris, it will have NO torps?! A few torps cost already more then some whole ships to buy in-game… they should leave it as part of the basic loadout when spawning/reclaiming ship. But just increase the claim time based on the components and armaments that need to be replaced…. Nobody is going to insurance fraud a Polaris if they got to wait nearly 2 hours…

  • @commandoge8617
    @commandoge8617 9 днів тому

    So there's a known bug that your missiles disappear from the loadout if you reclaim without restocking, so then you can't restock anymore, you have to go to the shop and buy missiles. So who thought it would be a good idea to make this a default feature. It was painful to get missiles in the first place with restocking being bugged or the shops being far away. Missile gameplay is just non existent except for in trailers

  • @BLACKSYNTH
    @BLACKSYNTH 9 днів тому

    The previous horrid HUD ate up what little overhead was left of my 24 core 14900HX CPU I could gain 100fps just powering off my ship.

  • @Keiser-h4z
    @Keiser-h4z 10 днів тому

    First thing i did when i saw this and the price increase is melt my eclipse, fck this, gonna be rich IRL AND in game to play a single seat ship i like now, great. i'll stay with my cheap cutlass and my 2 size 2 on my terrapin medical

  • @hagmak
    @hagmak 9 днів тому

    As much as I like the new look of the HUD, I don't think I will use it, because I love the clean look without it.

  • @SgtGrave
    @SgtGrave 9 днів тому

    I guarantee the tops o that eclipse are in inventory and we're not equipped on initial spawn, common bug I encounter even in live.

  • @Corngod123
    @Corngod123 9 днів тому

    I've been wanting them to get rid of more things on the hud not add more! I absolutely hate the fact that we can never get rid of the minimap when in first person mode, even without a helmet the map is still there which makes no sense

  •  10 днів тому +1

    Why do we have to chase that Wakapedia guy's messages to know where the patches are going?