2nd Naval Battle of Guadalcanal

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 сер 2024
  • We are still working our way through the actions at Guadalcanal, and we aren't done yet. Stay tuned!
    Please consider supporting the museum with a donation:
    www.BattleshipNewJersey.org/GIVE

КОМЕНТАРІ • 86

  • @joescriff4812
    @joescriff4812 4 роки тому +25

    Ocean Explorer Dr. Robert Ballard discovered many of the wrecks around Guadalcanal. He published an excellent book in 1993 titled "The Lost Ships of Guadalcanal" with photos and paintings of the sea bottom sites. Ballard's finds did include the wreck of Kirishima which was sunk by USS Washington.

    • @JohnRodriguesPhotographer
      @JohnRodriguesPhotographer 3 роки тому +3

      Great book.

    • @MaxCruise73
      @MaxCruise73 2 роки тому +2

      @Joe Scriff, I too have that book. Great book.

    • @jollyjohnthepirate3168
      @jollyjohnthepirate3168 Рік тому +1

      Turns out Lee was uncannily good. Kirishima was totally wrecked by Washington's gun fire. Lee claimed 5 or 6 hits because that's all he could see. But now we know that Washington scored some 16 or 17 big gun hits. Many of those were hits underwater on Kirishima's hull.

  • @Idahoguy10157
    @Idahoguy10157 3 роки тому +18

    Admiral Lee could keep an ongoing surface plot of the battle in his mind. The first American Admiral to do this.

    • @MrXelig
      @MrXelig 3 роки тому +3

      Sadly he died young from a heart attack, a week or two after the war ended.

    • @meramakeit7628
      @meramakeit7628 2 роки тому

      @@MrXelig probably from stress of war

    • @just_one_opinion
      @just_one_opinion Рік тому

      did the internet tell you this? Cool. I have some arizona beachfront property to sell you.

  • @nonamesplease6288
    @nonamesplease6288 4 роки тому +55

    The Washington appearing out of the dark, main guns blazing, is one of the last classic battleship moments of all time.

    • @jaybartholomew7826
      @jaybartholomew7826 3 роки тому +7

      USS Washington was ahead of USS South Dakota and again it was a very dark night. When the Japanese illuminated the South Dakota they never ever knew the Washington was with her until the battleship Kirishima started receiving 16 inch shells from Washington! Admiral "Ching" Lee was a good captain and held fire until he knew he had the Japanese ships where he wanted them (in his sights) as he charged out of the black night.

    • @rickmroz9212
      @rickmroz9212 3 роки тому +4

      @@jaybartholomew7826 Lee was Admiral while Glenn Davis was Captain of Washington. They were the best command combo during WW2

    • @just_one_opinion
      @just_one_opinion Рік тому

      @@rickmroz9212 what else did they accomplish?

    • @johnferguson1970
      @johnferguson1970 9 місяців тому

      The SoDak had to turn starboard to avoid hitting one of the burning DDs. The back-lighting from the fires silhouetted her and made her an easy target. Washington sailed to port, behind the burning destroyers, making her impossible to see.
      Lee did more than just shoot. He pushed hard for mass production of the proximity-fused shells. Despite his battleship backgtound, he urged that as many AA guns be put on a ship as would fit without affecting stability. He was working to devise ways to defeat kamikaze attacks when he died of a heart attack in Aug. 1945.

  • @JohnRodriguesPhotographer
    @JohnRodriguesPhotographer 3 роки тому +14

    Admiral Willis " Ching " Lee was the best gun admiral in the USN. Unlike many admirals he understood the capabilities and limitations radar.

  • @astancilstancil4529
    @astancilstancil4529 3 роки тому +15

    Might read Battleship at War by ivan musicant...Its the history of USS WASHINGTON from cradle to grave

    • @larryjones1359
      @larryjones1359 3 роки тому

      Thanks. I will order it

    • @jbuth31
      @jbuth31 3 роки тому +2

      Fantastic book

    • @vanya757
      @vanya757 3 роки тому

      Just ordered Battleship at War, thank you for the recommendation!

    • @jameslackiejr5913
      @jameslackiejr5913 2 роки тому

      Excellent book!

  • @USSBB62
    @USSBB62 3 роки тому +33

    All Four Battles of Savo Island in complete detail. Read the Book "NEPTUNES INFERNO"

    • @speed150mph
      @speed150mph 3 роки тому +5

      great book. im just finishing it myself.

    • @roscothefirst4712
      @roscothefirst4712 3 роки тому +3

      I listened to the audiobook- very well done 👍

    • @jaybartholomew7826
      @jaybartholomew7826 3 роки тому +2

      Neptunes Inferno is a great book

    • @keninatlanta8452
      @keninatlanta8452 3 роки тому +3

      One hell of a read. Can't recommend it more highly.

  • @fredrickmillstead6397
    @fredrickmillstead6397 3 роки тому +4

    Washington v Kirishima, night fight par excellance. Great narrative.

  • @Engine33Truck
    @Engine33Truck 3 роки тому +14

    In the first year of the war, the USN and IJN couldn’t’ve been more lopsided in nighttime battles, even when the USN engaged in superior numbers. The IJN was the undisputed master of night fighting. The USN, meanwhile, had superior technology (radar), but many field commanders didn’t know how to use that technology to their advantage, or worse didn’t trust it or its operators.

    • @richardfrench2863
      @richardfrench2863 2 роки тому

      They had a lot of practice and it took a while for us to get up to speed. That, and getting good commanders vs the politcal types that do well in peace time.

    • @tyree9055
      @tyree9055 2 роки тому

      I would love to know more about why the Japanese had superior night optics that gave them such a decisive edge.

  • @sb859
    @sb859 3 роки тому +18

    A graphic or map showing the ship positions would help to illustrate your story telling. Thanks for the video.

    • @sskuk1095
      @sskuk1095 2 роки тому

      Whatch the videos of The operations room.

    • @m1t2a1
      @m1t2a1 Рік тому

      Here's a link ua-cam.com/video/G_QhTdzWBJk/v-deo.html

  • @mikus4242
    @mikus4242 4 роки тому +13

    Evidently, the electrical casualty on the South Dakota that caused radar and fire control to drop out was self inflicted due to the chief engineer tying down a circuit breaker. It can be argued she was “soft killed” by the superstructure damage by the Japanese shells.

    • @jbuth31
      @jbuth31 3 роки тому +2

      he tied the fuses together in series effectively creating a daisy chain. One goes, they all go. Oops

    • @just_one_opinion
      @just_one_opinion Рік тому

      it fired no shells and it ran away burning as fast as it could. that's mission kill. shame!

  • @randyfant2588
    @randyfant2588 Рік тому +1

    One thing, he said that armor doesn't account for anything. I hate too but I have to correct this:
    South Dakota took a direct hit aft, abreast the aft barbette, by a 14” AP from Kirishima. The shell obliterated the wooden weather deck around that side of the barbet and the impact bent the STS splinter deck below it but the projectile impacted directly on the Barbet leaving a dent that could be seen inside, but deflected down through the splinter deck rather than penetrate the armored Barbet, dispite considerable damage to the light bulkheads in the compartment below, no discernible damage was done to the armored main deck below the splinter deck. SD’s armor absorbed the hit with only superficial damage (and a large semicircle of splinters where the wooded weather-deck had been.)

    • @allanboyer2769
      @allanboyer2769 5 місяців тому

      It's a good thing for SD that Karishma had 14 and not 16 inch guns. Ironically, it was Japan's failure to follow naval treaty on battleship displacement that allowed for Washington to upgrade her guns from the original treaty design of 14 inch, to the newer and more powerful 16 inch, 45 caliber guns.

  • @richardsleep2045
    @richardsleep2045 3 роки тому +4

    Well told, thank you.

  • @ksmurphable
    @ksmurphable 3 роки тому +2

    I swear half the time there’s a long pause I don’t know if it’s the video trying to load or if Ryan is just taking long awkward pause

  • @AcesnEights698
    @AcesnEights698 3 роки тому +6

    Why do we have endless movies about imaginary men in capes while this battle goes unnoticed?!?

    • @tyree9055
      @tyree9055 2 роки тому +1

      Because Marvel has an interest in promoting their "Men in Tights" franchise and pandering to the young American male the glories of individual, god-like power over teamwork and cooperation. Thereby, pandering to their egos, stealing their money with a smile, and simultaneously making them stupid.
      😏👍

  • @seventhson27
    @seventhson27 4 місяці тому

    THE IRONY of Willis Lee is that after all his gunnery practice and expertise, the battle with Kirishima is at "point blank" range.

  • @timandellenmoran1213
    @timandellenmoran1213 2 роки тому +1

    Nice job Ryan 👍👍👍

  • @tedrussell902
    @tedrussell902 3 роки тому +8

    I knew a guy that was on the BB Washington in this battle. He told me that the Jabs. just didn't see them. He also said they had a name for the South Dakota that I can't put on here. I guess it was just battleship competition or pride in your ship.

    • @tyree9055
      @tyree9055 2 роки тому

      Japanese Optics, while superior, still can't see behind a burning ship or wreck. That's why dropping flares from scout planes at night behind your opponents was such a good tactic.

    • @scottl9660
      @scottl9660 2 роки тому +1

      There was real enmity between SoDak and Washington crews. The leadership had to start staggering shore leave between the ships to keep the fights down.

    • @tedrussell902
      @tedrussell902 2 роки тому

      @@scottl9660 that’s what I understand… ☺️

    • @carolnelson9269
      @carolnelson9269 Рік тому +2

      The animosity was due to the fact that the SoDak received the publicity for the battles outcome. This was due to the idea the Navy did not want the Washington's presence in theater to be known.

    • @just_one_opinion
      @just_one_opinion Рік тому

      sukk dikkkota

  • @trailhog86
    @trailhog86 4 роки тому +4

    Great video! Do you know how many casualties there were for both sides? Im especially curious how many were on South Dakota as she took hits.

  • @charlieryan6550
    @charlieryan6550 2 роки тому +1

    You seemed to say Washington had 15” guns. She had 16” main armament, a slightly smaller calibre but same diameter as New Jersey.

  • @Farmer-bh3cg
    @Farmer-bh3cg 3 роки тому +9

    "... losing up to 50soldiers a day through malnutrition." Read: they were starving to death.

  • @chuckliebenauer3656
    @chuckliebenauer3656 Рік тому

    Technology when used give one an I,proved ability to prevail. Radar was one that you would have thought ALL of the US admirals would have been trained on. The cruiser force in the previous battle might have prevailed if their radar had been used.

  • @tombriggman2875
    @tombriggman2875 4 роки тому +2

    Looking good in CIC

  • @snakeplissken2018
    @snakeplissken2018 3 роки тому +2

    You said at point blank range shell sizes doesn't matter
    So here is a hypothetical question a what if while Halsey was off chasing empty carrieers the Japanese concentrated their forces including their two biggest Yamato class battleships with other battleships and supporting vessels otherwise the main strike force and tried to run the gauntlet at the battle of surigao strait
    Would the old battleships that were sunk at pearl harbor be able to stop them ?
    All I know is that battle would be one for the ages

    • @tyree9055
      @tyree9055 2 роки тому

      All of the escort carriers would have sunk them probably before they could've gotten within range. They were present at Leyte Gulf (albeit on the southern side of the landing forces, whereas the Japanese were on the northern side) and there were still more "Taffy" groups of escort carriers like the ones they fought on the northern side.
      Kurita was right to withdraw, I just believe he withdrew too early before he'd gotten into the U.S. landing forces (but he screwed up when he ordered General Attack and the Japanese fleet became scattered too).

  • @naoakiooishi6823
    @naoakiooishi6823 2 роки тому +1

    Battleship at War

  • @henryjohnston6023
    @henryjohnston6023 Рік тому

    The USS Mississippi was held back along the west coast. What other ships were held back? Were they too old to make a difference?

  • @ambush_akula5261
    @ambush_akula5261 Рік тому

    Kirishima: I’m gonna beat up South Dakota
    Washington: “and I took that personally”

  • @rickmroz9212
    @rickmroz9212 Рік тому

    I recommend reading Battleship Commander: The life of Vice Admiral Willis A Lee Jr by Paul Stillwell

  • @SangsungMeansToCome
    @SangsungMeansToCome 3 роки тому +2

    At night, all battleships are grey ...

  • @Theearthtraveler
    @Theearthtraveler 3 роки тому +2

    Very good explanation!!

  • @harrymurphey2634
    @harrymurphey2634 Рік тому

    ... There was a very interesting "radio exchange" between the US PT boats that saw these (2) very large darkened ships going by in the dark ... who are these ships ??? ... Admiral "Ching Lee" ... got on the "open" radio channel ... "This Admiral Ching Lee" ... Reply from the PT's ... Who? ... Admiral Lee ... "Talk to your boss (Vandergrif) ... Now get out of our way, we are coming through ..." and the Washington went in and took care of business !!!!

    • @HACM-mk3qx
      @HACM-mk3qx Рік тому

      Mr. Frank's book Guadacanal has it in detail. A good read.

  • @chadr2604
    @chadr2604 9 місяців тому

    Wasnt that when the captain on Washington.told Enterprise to stay back im coming through then they shot the hell out of a Japanese battle ship and cruisers and destroyers and they were not any good after that?

  • @ExploringCabinsandMines
    @ExploringCabinsandMines 2 роки тому

    How on earth do you remember all this information!!!

  • @bobdelano6746
    @bobdelano6746 Рік тому

    God bless those lost !

  • @haldorasgirson9463
    @haldorasgirson9463 2 роки тому +1

    Twenty 5"-38 secondary weapons. Yah, I bet those could clean up any destroyer ever built in very short order.

  • @charlesstrunk3413
    @charlesstrunk3413 3 роки тому +1

    and the four destroyers that were sunk or withdrew were?

    • @kenhanks9620
      @kenhanks9620 3 роки тому +1

      Gwin, Preston, Benham, and Walke
      whose Capt. Thomas Fraser in provisional command of the temporary destroyer group perished in the battle with Gwin only surviving DD.
      As mentioned in other comments book "Battleship At War" by Ivan Musicant (about USS Washington) excellent coverage of this battle.

    • @charlesstrunk3413
      @charlesstrunk3413 2 роки тому +1

      @@kenhanks9620 many thanks for your information, my dad who survived the sinking was on the Preston

    • @kenhanks9620
      @kenhanks9620 2 роки тому +1

      @@charlesstrunk3413 God Bless your dad for his service to our country.

    • @tyree9055
      @tyree9055 2 роки тому

      @@charlesstrunk3413 What were his thoughts on the battle? Anything, or did he avoid speaking about it?

  • @victorydaydeepstate
    @victorydaydeepstate Рік тому

    Didn't you talk about the New Orleans losing its bow in the Battle of Tassaforanga?

  • @fredwinter7411
    @fredwinter7411 3 роки тому +1

    What about the battle of Leyte Gulf, it came after the Philippine Sea battle.

  • @edwardharding8005
    @edwardharding8005 4 роки тому +2

    Wasn't Admiral Lee's nickname "China" ?

    • @mikus4242
      @mikus4242 4 роки тому +8

      Edward Harding His nickname of “Ching” came from his naval academy days.

    • @johnferguson1970
      @johnferguson1970 2 роки тому

      During the battle, he was concerned that PT boats based nearby might attack him, and he heard radio transmissions that the PT boats were eying him as a possible target. He knew the commander of the PT flotilla personally, so he broadcast the unmistakable message: "Stand aside. I am coming through. This is Ching Lee. Call off your boys."

  • @timf2279
    @timf2279 2 роки тому

    RYAN are you intoxicated or buzzed when you make these videos?

  • @johnbluebeard4355
    @johnbluebeard4355 3 роки тому +2

    Good job on the video.

  • @killman369547
    @killman369547 3 роки тому +1

    Kiroshima: Disables South Dakota.
    Washington: Exterminatus!!!!

    • @johnferguson1970
      @johnferguson1970 2 роки тому

      South Dakota has entered the group.
      Kirishima has entered the group.
      Washington has entered the group.
      Kirishima has left the group.