Plus the Judge asked Sarah Boone every day before the trial continued, if she was content with how her lawyer was handling her and her case. Everytime, she said she was
And she barely did anything- she held it together 100 percent better than Owens, who threw yet another temper tantrum. There is no worse tantrum than the one that comes from a privileged old white man. Yuck. RIP to Jorge and much love to his mother.
Especially when she wasn't even audibly grieving over watching her son being tortured to death, but Owens made a huge fuss about telling her to leave the courtroom.
@@GilraenTookOwens planned that, he waited for *any* indication of grief from the family to rage about, 'never seen anything like this before! This has to be a mistrial now!' It was his last ditch effort to drag out justice even more.
Thank goodness there’s no new trial. Everyone deserves to have a fair trial. That being said, Ms. Boone has had more opportunities, attorneys and fairness than most.
7-8 years from now just think how that’s going to eat at her…. Every night when she lays her head on a crappy jailhouse pillow she’ll be thinking..”I’d be home right now if I took the plea”. That has to be one of the worst dice rolls in history.
She truly did not deserve leniency and she would (will be?) horrible upon release. Unless her lobotomy is complete. (I think Acme Chainsaws, BBQ and Medical Services may have a bargain in decades to come.)
Justice for JORGE. Sarah was so cruel. She must have been a living hell to live with. She is causing as much drama still as possible. Rest in peace Jorge.
And the prison guards won’t put up with her 🐴 💩 either. It’s going to take her weeks if not months of repeated disciplinary actions before she finally settles in and goes with the flow of prison life. I have a sliver of hope that she’ll eventually become a ‘model prisoner’ eventually, as most lifers do.
@@teresathayn5170 Give me a break. Jorge was an adult and fully capable of feeding himself. Besides that, a raging alcoholic and alcoholics aren’t known for taking good care of themselves let alone having well rounded diets.
At the risk of victim-blaming, Sarah did not look like any battered spouse I've seen in the videos of her conduct with Jorje. She seemed in control and manipulative telling him what to do and say. Quite the opposite actions of a battered spouse. She went with the wrong defence and you don't get a do-over. That what's she really wants.
Even when claiming that defense she jumped back and forth from unintentional to it was him or her. No ab/us/er is going to let themselves be caught in a position for someone to get the upper hand. Anyone who has been on the other side of that knows not to do something like she did, ESPECIALLY to teach them a lesson. You don’t correct them! Someone who has been on the other side of that wouldn’t have went upstairs and went to sleep. IF that opportunity presented itself, they would know it was time to run and there would be no goin’ back. Gettin’ them into that position of helplessness and then laughing at them and leaving, the cops coming (therefore others seein’ them like that) would carry a pretty hefty price. AND THEN… To say that she hopes more ppl will be drawn to HER light… Nah! We are called to draw others closer to Christ, not ourselves. We want others to see Him in us. I hope that sinks in for her.
Bingo. That's why I loved that Judge Kraynik's colloquy prior to her sentencing was nonexistent. Boone thrives on outrage: the less said, the better. (She probably did a Rumplestiltskin impression when she found out about the appellate ruling.)
@@mortalclown3812 There has not been any appellate ruling, yet. The trial court ruled ("Denied") on the request for a new trial on the basis of supposed errors. Sarah Boone will have filed a notice of intent to appeal, by now; but, it is unlikely that her appointed appellate lawyer has even completed the research for, and writing of, her actual appeal -- yet. Once the appeal has been completed and submitted to the appellate court for consideration, Sarah Boone's waiting game begins.
Its a pretty cold heart that blames a homicide victim's mother for a reaction to photos of her dead son! I was watching and heard no disturbance. If she was trying to "sway the jury," she could have wailed loudly and refused to leave. Using that to try to get a new trisl, a minor reaction of the victim's mother, is absolutely despicable!
I used to work with an appeals lawyer. He always told me appeal isn’t about proving guilt or innocence. In appellate court it is the court that is being tested against the law, not the defendant.
This is why I thought Judge K was perfect for this trial. He held a masterclass on how to handle difficult litigants. His patience and fairness was admirable. 'You have the right to that opinion, but what does the law say?'
It's like someone better fund her commissary so she can buy lots of paper, pencils and stamps. I have a feeling she's going to go through a whole tree before next year. Waiting what's going to happen for her family court issue. I saw an interview where a childhood friend spoke of what she was like as a kid. Sadly, it seemed like she really could have done something productive with her life before.
The family of Jorge Torres is destroyed, her son’s life is jacked but let’s now have a moment of silence for the poor souls who work in the prison dealing with this BOTTOMLESS PIT OF HELL OF A PERSON!
She doesn’t deserve a new trial. She went through many attorneys because they couldn’t get along. She thinks she is always right. She is guilty, & thinks she is perfect.
With time served, and with the max 15% reduction for good behavior, she could have walked in a little over 8 years. And the last couple of years would have likely been in min security, or work release. We all know this by now, but it pleases me to repeat it.😆😆😆
I guess I’m still confused on how “she wasn’t allowed a court appointed attorney” being a good argument for appeal. She went to trial with a TEAM OF ATTORNEYS, so doesn’t that just make that decision no longer relevant? If she had represented herself and found guilty I get it. But with owens there? I don’t at all.
She had public defenders, but she kept trying to do their jobs, and they each asked to be let off the case. By her own actions, she waived her right to a public defender in criminal court.
Because she went thru 9 public defenders. They ALL asked to be released from her because she was being sooooo difficult. 9 attorneys. So they finally cut her off and told her being she can't get along with anyone, then she can Represent herself. She played on the sympathy of Mr. Owens and he came forward because of his feeling that everyone deserves to be defended until they are found guilty or innocent. He tried his best and, he gave it all he could in that amount of time 40 days I believe. I think he did right by her as far as he could. But its her actions that caused all this.....9 attorneys. She rejected the "sweetheart" deal Owens was able to get for her, which had to be an uphill battle but, he got her 8yrs and she had already served 4 years. And then she'd be out. But, nooooo she rejected it, that's on her. I mean how stupid can you be....8 years rejected when you've already served 4, went to trial and got life no porole. Stupid!!!
She is in close security now too so it will be even harder for her to pull her bs which is probably part of the reason she is in such a high security level
The biggest punishment for her will be when all the attention goes away. Her relevancy is most important to her. Hopefully, when she loses her audience she can start self-reflecting and change.
She won't change, but you're correct in that being ignored will be her biggest punishment. That and the further loss of control in prison, as opposed to jail.
Thanks to the Honorable Judge Kraynick , he stayed mindful of Sarah’s tendency to attempt to find reasons to derail her trial. Judge Kraynick frequently asked Sarah if she was Happy with the representation of her 9th Attorney. The Judge made sure the Prosecution and the Defense were staying in their legal lane. Sarah Boone has little chance of winning in her Appellate case. She needs to be a woman and do her life sentence and shut her pie hole.
People on the stream couldn't even hear Jorge torres' mother when owens threw a fit. It was the most quite "outburst" in the history of cases. Owens was the one who had an outburst.
I find it absolutely fascinating that it is even being tossed around, that Sarah lost her right to court appointed council, when she got a private firm with 3 lawyers and 2 assistance🤨
Hi. I am 66 year young lady from South Africa. I have wTched for a while and have just subscribe and did the bell. You are so real. Just another reason to fight my cancer. ❤❤❤Thank you.
I just loved Judge Kraynick, he was the definition of a fair judge, so incredibly professional and considerate. Also, 2nd Best Oralist was on Bourbon St. at Mardi Gras is fucking hilarious, great story 🤣
The issues with appellate councel are not Suzie Suitcase's fault. The appointed counsel doesn't do appellate work. Whoever was appointed is probably jumping for joy they didn't get stuck with St. Sarah.
But James Owens is a good defense lawyer. Keep in mind that Sarah Boone is her own worst enemy and had NOTHING going for her. She's the kind of person who thinks she's the smartest person in the room at all times. James Owens did what he could to help her, but the ultimate decisions on how they proceeded were up to Sarah.
For the person in chat looking for Darryl Brooks. He was sent to a prison outside of Wisconsin. There is a prison in S. Dakota that is taking high profile prisoners so best guess is he was sent there. (Adelson was sent there) After a couple weeks, searches for his location maybe more fruitful.
If she were to get another trial based on appeal, would she have to keep battered spouse defense or is it possible to change defense strategy? ie oh well that didn't work so let's try this?
All the evidence is still the evidence. . It seems like the state would be able to introduce all the evidence from the jump, too, summer the convict rendered it all admissible.
No. An appeal is not a new trial. Two very different things. An appeal attacks the court, not the actual charge. There will be no "new strategy" for Sarah Booze 😕
@@schrisdellopoulos9244 thats not what this person is saying. But says if in appeal they say she gets a new trail and than she has a new trail. Can she than have a other strategy in that new trail. That is a yes.
It is at least 12 ft from bottom of stairs to by dining table , where she removed jorge from suitcase. Thats a lot of flipping sarah did. Why did no one ever ask the cow about this fact at trial ?
She was offered the manslaughter charge at the last minute before the trial and she stupidly rejected it. Even with a 5-year head start on the 15-year sentence. Narcissism can be a beetch.
no one is going to agree to go through her nonsense again. ever. it's done.she chose to be so painful to deal with .... and this is a very clear case.... it's done
The "problems" with appellate counsel might be that the first one doesn't actually work appeals. They subsequently assigned one that does, and as far as I know that person won't really deal with the convict as he looks for substantial errors at the trial court level.
Yes again Sarah is confused like the appellate court is going to weed through her letters for wrongdoings. They are only going by what's in the motion.❤😊
Last I saw they were no longer being represented by Anderson and were back with Whitney. Not sure how current that is though. An update would be very interesting
I’ve heard that the appeal attorney has little to no contact with the convict. Their job is to review the case file and file briefs if appropriate. Sarah’s head is going to explode.
@Mandy...she will explode. Sarah refuses to acknowledge any truth that she feels would disregard her own wishes. She will insist that her rights are being trampled (again) and she will go to absurd lengths in attempting to contact this lawyer and try to "threaten" him with bad publicity. That's how her sick mind works.
Sarah will be writing letters to the governor for rest of her life . Its so nice that she will have busy work to keep her out of trouble with otber inmates
Boon will never be over or think about Jorge as her victim..... SHE will always be a victim in her mind...... NEVER believe she is HER OWN VICTIM 👹💯✨️👹💯✨️👹💯✨️👹💯✨️
Sarah Boone will never be over, ... she will never reflect on Jorge , and will never take the blame of being the ABUSER in the relationship!! Sarah doesn't realize that she is the one that abuses herself!!! She is never going to be finished trying to cause some kind of trouble even in prison!!!
@@amandafranks2683have you seen any of the research on how being a victim of a narcissist can make the victim start acting like a narcissist in defense? If anything, I think that was what happened with Jorge. She considers him defending himself as attacking her. (Owens' argument about Jorge's fingers coming out of the suitcase being enough justification for SB to do what she did proved that to me.)
Hey Peter, can you cover The Rose Petal Trial? Out of South Carolina. A classical train pianist is charged with the murder of a woman. Lots of layers to this case but looks very interesting. Thanks for considering.
An appeal and a new trial are two different things. A new trial starts from zero and is a full trial again and appeal means the ruling gets overturned.
@@Cataldoland Yes, you're correct, she has a right to appeal. The appeal isn't under discussion in this video; what's under discussion is the state's response to her motion for a new trial..
Yes because in her mind she did nothing wrong and they are all just not getting it. So at one point someone needs to get it and will let ger out because she did nothing wrong. She cant even grasp how we are all so stupid that we dont get it. Its so darn clear she did nothing wrong!!
@@pamelaoliver8442 yes that why in Gods name dont we all just get that its so clear that it wasnt intentional!!! And that that makes everything right!!!
Yes. And I love her for it because otherwise she would've taken the plea deal. She dug herself a hole she can never get out of. If you look up the word narcissist, her picture should be there. 😂
Re: Court appointed attorney, Owen’s stated he was getting paid. He was not pro bono. I was surprised to see she got funds after he stated she had worked out payment plan, including her divorce settlement from sale of house.
Didn't he tell the court that he was pro-bono in one of the first hearings and then in his next interview he went on about how he had worked out a payment plan with SB because it was important the client has some investment in the case (or some other type of nonsense)?
Can her statement made at time of sentencing be included by appellate court as well as the addendum statement? SB showed heartless comments made about everyone including the victim’s family.
🙋♀️ Hey there, Peter and staff. Thank you for this recap. Not sure anyone will see this comment, but if you do, please know I had to lower the speed on this video just to keep up with Peter’s rapid-fire speaking. Shazam! Don’t know if he either had an energy drink or several cups of coffee before taping, but I’ve never had such a challenging time keeping up, and am heading for my settings to lower the speed in order to finish. 😅 Hopefully, I’ve given you at least a brief giggle, along with my respectful hint-hint for the future. Hope y’all have a great Thursday! Appreciate all of you. 🖖
You mentioned a trial (problems with the lawyers) but I don’t recognize the name. I replayed it over and over…to try and hear what you said but no luck. help!
If this case wasn’t high profile, and IF there wasn’t the underlying doubt that this should’ve been first degree vs second degree murder (potentially allowing her to get a less deserved sentence, so they wanted to make sure they did everything possible to not allow her to have a chance at appeal) I doubt the court would’ve allowed her to go through so many lawyers to begin with, this is unheard of. She was literally “choosing” her lawyers by what she was doing to make them withdraw (and we’ll never know the truth about how badly she might’ve treated them or what threats she might’ve made, since they can’t say), which is not allowed by someone who can’t pay for their own lawyer.
If she had claimed BSS and renewed all the evidence admissible from the beginning, I think the state would have gone for 1st degree. As it was, they had to really in the evidence that they knew was admissible; a lot of that was the convict's own testimoney.
COMMENT: Hi Peter, we covered Darrell Brooks move on another channel and he was moved to another state and we believe it was a security issue because his appeals attorney Covey was not made aware of the move in advance.
I totally disagree. The court's denial of a right to counsel was the most perfectly crafted ruling imaginable, and it's UN imaginable an appeal court would fail to see that.
If SB would have lawyered up, not said one word or agree to any questioning, kept her first attorney and wrote no letters she would have been convicted of some form of manslaughter and possibly be out of jail by now. Without her input the scene would have baffled police.
Too bad she thinks she is smarter than everyone. Also in her mind Jorge deserved what he got so why not tell everyone and they will see it the same way and she would be off scot-free
Correct me if im wrong but it would seem at first impression that the state courts cannot issue such an order if appeals procedurally lie in the federal district court or the federal circuit court of appeals.
I think we all know that plea deal was more than fair and a fantastic offer; but Sarah is incapable of mentally grasping that. Her twisted thinking only sees that she did nothing wrong, is the victim, and everyone that does not believe her is wrong.
wait, what's going on with the Maya lawyers? I watched the documentary on Netflix after I saw this video. Watching a few of your older videos about her case. OMG. So tragic
She's in high security because the state isn't stupid. We see her as a joke but unfortunately psychopaths like Boone are highly manipulative and she's a danger in prison because she has already gotten in trouble for manipulating and creating drama with other prisoners
I believe jail is a city or county holding facility. It is usually "short term". Meaning 5 years or less, I believe, could be wrong about the time frame. But it is for city or county crimes. Prison is the state holding facility, for longer term or state prosecution, including shorter term sentences but are state level prosecutions.
Sarah Boone accuses Jorge of raping her. It's defamation‼️In Sweden, you can be punished for accusing someone without proof. You can also be charged with defamation, even if it is true "The penalty for defamation is a fine. If the defamation is considered serious, the penalty can be a fine or imprisonment for up to six months." Do you don't have any law like this in the US?
I believe that statements made as part of legal procedure are privileged in order to allow witnesses to speak freely and openly in trial, so unless Sarah was broadcasting these allegations outside of court, I don't think there's a claim for defamation. I'm sure Judge Kraynick had his own opinions on the truthfulness of her complaints, and that in part led to the life sentence.
You are correct about moving past her, but is is hard, at least for me. It captivated my attention for many years kind of like a soap opera. There are a couple channels out that are dragging the story out after the conviction and sentencing which is IMO too much. The case is closed. End of story, but the Sarah Boone withdrawal is real.
The State of Florida stood on its head to try to give Sarah the fairest trial possible. I love Judge Kraynick!
I love Mr William Jay. He is working on the Madeline Soto case. So nice👌🏽
Kraynick. Help me please help me they are all riding against me. Help judge. She is pathetic
@@Xgirly-1983 I need to pay more attention to the Madeline Soto case.
Plus the Judge asked Sarah Boone every day before the trial continued, if she was content with how her lawyer was handling her and her case. Everytime, she said she was
❤❤❤❤❤
He was no dummy, he was playing four dimensional chess while she was playing beer pong.
@@mrmtoad😂😂😂
She said extremely one time lol
He was an excellent judge. He knew what he was dealing with…
Im so sick of the defense dragging Georges mother for breaking down in court over the video. Holy sh!t that just boils my blood.
And she barely did anything- she held it together 100 percent better than Owens, who threw yet another temper tantrum. There is no worse tantrum than the one that comes from a privileged old white man. Yuck. RIP to Jorge and much love to his mother.
Especially when she wasn't even audibly grieving over watching her son being tortured to death, but Owens made a huge fuss about telling her to leave the courtroom.
@@GilraenTookOwens planned that, he waited for *any* indication of grief from the family to rage about, 'never seen anything like this before! This has to be a mistrial now!' It was his last ditch effort to drag out justice even more.
@@kismetcaffet9862 Absolutely. "The prosecution planned it" my rear end!
@@kismetcaffet9862I'm glad drunkie the bear got life!!!
Thank goodness there’s no new trial. Everyone deserves to have a fair trial. That being said, Ms. Boone has had more opportunities, attorneys and fairness than most.
And I don't understand why.
In some places there are people still sitting after months and months for their first attorney.
It'll still take a couple years before her appeals get denied.
That's your opinion. NOT ours.
@@templedrake6890lmao...
I'm glad she turned down the plea deal offered! Glad she won't be out in society due to her own actions!
7-8 years from now just think how that’s going to eat at her….
Every night when she lays her head on a crappy jailhouse pillow she’ll be thinking..”I’d be home right now if I took the plea”. That has to be one of the worst dice rolls in history.
Unintentional though 😅😅😅
She truly did not deserve leniency and she would (will be?) horrible upon release. Unless her lobotomy is complete. (I think Acme Chainsaws, BBQ and Medical Services may have a bargain in decades to come.)
@@RoSaWa386-33That a threat?
I want to thank Owens for representing her, it made the judicial process work for justice!
Yes, he deserves some major recognition
You're correct, he step up when he didn't have to.
100%. If Mr Owens didn’t step in when he did her trial would be a train wreck and vulnerable to post conviction chaos.
He was one weird cat.
He really did give us a show to remember😂
Justice for JORGE. Sarah was so cruel. She must have been a living hell to live with. She is causing as much drama still as possible. Rest in peace Jorge.
And the prison guards won’t put up with her 🐴 💩 either. It’s going to take her weeks if not months of repeated disciplinary actions before she finally settles in and goes with the flow of prison life. I have a sliver of hope that she’ll eventually become a ‘model prisoner’ eventually, as most lifers do.
Did you see how emaciated Jorge was in the end?!? I think she wasn't even feeding him!
@@teresathayn5170 Give me a break. Jorge was an adult and fully capable of feeding himself. Besides that, a raging alcoholic and alcoholics aren’t known for taking good care of themselves let alone having well rounded diets.
@@teresathayn5170feeding him? Was he a dog? A child? He was a grown man and chose to drink booze instead of eating right. It's pretty common.
At the risk of victim-blaming, Sarah did not look like any battered spouse I've seen in the videos of her conduct with Jorje. She seemed in control and manipulative telling him what to do and say. Quite the opposite actions of a battered spouse. She went with the wrong defence and you don't get a do-over. That what's she really wants.
Even when claiming that defense she jumped back and forth from unintentional to it was him or her.
No ab/us/er is going to let themselves be caught in a position for someone to get the upper hand. Anyone who has been on the other side of that knows not to do something like she did, ESPECIALLY to teach them a lesson. You don’t correct them! Someone who has been on the other side of that wouldn’t have went upstairs and went to sleep.
IF that opportunity presented itself, they would know it was time to run and there would be no goin’ back. Gettin’ them into that position of helplessness and then laughing at them and leaving, the cops coming (therefore others seein’ them like that) would carry a pretty hefty price.
AND THEN…
To say that she hopes more ppl will be drawn to HER light…
Nah!
We are called to draw others closer to Christ, not ourselves. We want others to see Him in us.
I hope that sinks in for her.
When it walks like the abuser and quacks like the abuser...
The best punishment for Sarah is to completely ignore.
A narcissist, will implode if totally ignored like they don’t exist, which she shouldn’t.
Bingo. That's why I loved that Judge Kraynik's colloquy prior to her sentencing was nonexistent. Boone thrives on outrage: the less said, the better.
(She probably did a Rumplestiltskin impression when she found out about the appellate ruling.)
@@mortalclown3812 There has not been any appellate ruling, yet. The trial court ruled ("Denied") on the request for a new trial on the basis of supposed errors.
Sarah Boone will have filed a notice of intent to appeal, by now; but, it is unlikely that her appointed appellate lawyer has even completed the research for, and writing of, her actual appeal -- yet. Once the appeal has been completed and submitted to the appellate court for consideration, Sarah Boone's waiting game begins.
Sarah: "blah blah blah lies lies lies". State: "No."
She is soooo insufferable!!!
I’m playing my violin for Sarah 🙄🙄🎻🎻🎻🎻🎻
😂😂😂😂😂
Hahahahaha Hi from Alberta Canada
Its a pretty cold heart that blames a homicide victim's mother for a reaction to photos of her dead son! I was watching and heard no disturbance. If she was trying to "sway the jury," she could have wailed loudly and refused to leave. Using that to try to get a new trisl, a minor reaction of the victim's mother, is absolutely despicable!
I used to work with an appeals lawyer. He always told me appeal isn’t about proving guilt or innocence. In appellate court it is the court that is being tested against the law, not the defendant.
This is why I thought Judge K was perfect for this trial. He held a masterclass on how to handle difficult litigants. His patience and fairness was admirable. 'You have the right to that opinion, but what does the law say?'
@ I agree wholeheartedly. Every decision he made came with case law. I felt he left no room for appeal.
patiently waiting for her letter about this
It's like someone better fund her commissary so she can buy lots of paper, pencils and stamps. I have a feeling she's going to go through a whole tree before next year. Waiting what's going to happen for her family court issue. I saw an interview where a childhood friend spoke of what she was like as a kid. Sadly, it seemed like she really could have done something productive with her life before.
And it'll be a long one.
she doesnt have a docket to send letters to any more
The family of Jorge Torres is destroyed, her son’s life is jacked but let’s now have a moment of silence for the poor souls who work in the prison dealing with this BOTTOMLESS PIT OF HELL OF A PERSON!
She doesn’t deserve a new trial. She went through many attorneys because they couldn’t get along. She thinks she is always right. She is guilty, & thinks she is perfect.
With time served, and with the max 15% reduction for good behavior, she could have walked in a little over 8 years. And the last couple of years would have likely been in min security, or work release.
We all know this by now, but it pleases me to repeat it.😆😆😆
Adding time served in she was half way through.
😂😂
There is no parole in Florida. Time is time there.
I guess I’m still confused on how “she wasn’t allowed a court appointed attorney” being a good argument for appeal. She went to trial with a TEAM OF ATTORNEYS, so doesn’t that just make that decision no longer relevant? If she had represented herself and found guilty I get it. But with owens there? I don’t at all.
Great question!!!
She had public defenders, but she kept trying to do their jobs, and they each asked to be let off the case. By her own actions, she waived her right to a public defender in criminal court.
Because she went thru 9 public defenders. They ALL asked to be released from her because she was being sooooo difficult. 9 attorneys. So they finally cut her off and told her being she can't get along with anyone, then she can Represent herself. She played on the sympathy of Mr. Owens and he came forward because of his feeling that everyone deserves to be defended until they are found guilty or innocent. He tried his best and, he gave it all he could in that amount of time 40 days I believe. I think he did right by her as far as he could. But its her actions that caused all this.....9 attorneys. She rejected the "sweetheart" deal Owens was able to get for her, which had to be an uphill battle but, he got her 8yrs and she had already served 4 years. And then she'd be out. But, nooooo she rejected it, that's on her. I mean how stupid can you be....8 years rejected when you've already served 4, went to trial and got life no porole. Stupid!!!
She is in close security now too so it will be even harder for her to pull her bs which is probably part of the reason she is in such a high security level
Sarah Boon is a pathetic excuse of a human. That’s why the worlds fairest judge gave her a life sentence
The biggest punishment for her will be when all the attention goes away. Her relevancy is most important to her. Hopefully, when she loses her audience she can start self-reflecting and change.
Narcissists never change!
i hope she stays angry until she is 80
She won't change, but you're correct in that being ignored will be her biggest punishment. That and the further loss of control in prison, as opposed to jail.
Thanks to the Honorable Judge Kraynick , he stayed mindful of Sarah’s tendency to attempt to find reasons to derail her trial.
Judge Kraynick frequently asked Sarah if she was Happy with the representation of her 9th Attorney.
The Judge made sure the Prosecution and the Defense were staying in their legal lane.
Sarah Boone has little chance of winning in her Appellate case.
She needs to be a woman and do her life sentence and shut her pie hole.
😂
People on the stream couldn't even hear Jorge torres' mother when owens threw a fit. It was the most quite "outburst" in the history of cases.
Owens was the one who had an outburst.
How is not having representation an issue when she ended up with 3 lawyers for trial?
Thank you Judge!
Thank you keeping us updated
I find it absolutely fascinating that it is even being tossed around, that Sarah lost her right to court appointed council, when she got a private firm with 3 lawyers and 2 assistance🤨
Hi. I am 66 year young lady from South Africa. I have wTched for a while and have just subscribe and did the bell.
You are so real. Just another reason to fight my cancer. ❤❤❤Thank you.
Ok Mama. Okay.
Thank you again for your insightful coverage!
I just loved Judge Kraynick, he was the definition of a fair judge, so incredibly professional and considerate.
Also, 2nd Best Oralist was on Bourbon St. at Mardi Gras is fucking hilarious, great story 🤣
The issues with appellate councel are not Suzie Suitcase's fault. The appointed counsel doesn't do appellate work. Whoever was appointed is probably jumping for joy they didn't get stuck with St. Sarah.
when you said 'James Owens is a good defense lawyer' I almost choked then had to check date wasn't April 1st.
Look, the guy was clunky, but his “parachuting in” really did save everyone from a lot of contusions from banging their heads against brick walls.
@@gorschtown hi, check his past and Henderson's too, not good.
@@dgod62 He did fine in the trial despite having a disasterclass client and no time to prepare lol. Also he did it completely free
But James Owens is a good defense lawyer. Keep in mind that Sarah Boone is her own worst enemy and had NOTHING going for her. She's the kind of person who thinks she's the smartest person in the room at all times. James Owens did what he could to help her, but the ultimate decisions on how they proceeded were up to Sarah.
I agree sorta. Just remember up until day 5 Sarah was going to be found not guilty or guilty of the lesser charge.
She shouldn't get one.😂😂😂😂Thats why the judge was amazing letting stuff go within a fight.
Replay crew here! Thanks LYK! ❤
Thx Peter . Thanks for return !
What a shock…Ummm like NO 😮
For the person in chat looking for Darryl Brooks. He was sent to a prison outside of Wisconsin. There is a prison in S. Dakota that is taking high profile prisoners so best guess is he was sent there. (Adelson was sent there) After a couple weeks, searches for his location maybe more fruitful.
If she were to get another trial based on appeal, would she have to keep battered spouse defense or is it possible to change defense strategy? ie oh well that didn't work so let's try this?
Completely new trail so they can come with completely new strategy
All the evidence is still the evidence. . It seems like the state would be able to introduce all the evidence from the jump, too, summer the convict rendered it all admissible.
No. An appeal is not a new trial. Two very different things. An appeal attacks the court, not the actual charge. There will be no "new strategy" for Sarah Booze 😕
@@schrisdellopoulos9244 thats not what this person is saying. But says if in appeal they say she gets a new trail and than she has a new trail. Can she than have a other strategy in that new trail. That is a yes.
It is at least 12 ft from bottom of stairs to by dining table , where she removed jorge from suitcase. Thats a lot of flipping sarah did. Why did no one ever ask the cow about this fact at trial ?
they did, mr jay brought it up in his rebuttal
@@horvathsogranfume658 thank you. I missed it!! gotra listen again
Great coverage
Can’t thank you enough for covering this Peter ❤
QQQ: Does this mean that Sarah can’t have angry letters published on the record for extra attention? Please say yes! I am SO sick of her game! 🙄🙄🙄
They are quite entertaining imo😁
Her docket is closed , so no her letters won’t be published on her record
I can't get enough of her delusions! What a fascinating specimen.
@@johannaarmone3195definitely keeps our minds alert lol
I have a feeling Sarah will try to find a way to get her letters out to the public. Perhaps through a UA-cam creator??
Sarah Boone is guilty as sin. She turned down the plea deal of the century. Too bad so sad Looney Booney.😂😂
She really screwed herself.
@@19bigmac77and I am SO here for it 😂😂😂
@@19bigmac77 many times
15 years with time served… out in 7.5…. She screwed up BIG TIME.
Happy New Year Peter & thanks for being here & being succinct! 🎉
Boone Bucks, baby!
I suspect if she had gone with one of her earlier lawyers shortly after she was charged she could have been convicted of manslaughter.
She was offered the manslaughter charge at the last minute before the trial and she stupidly rejected it. Even with a 5-year head start on the 15-year sentence. Narcissism can be a beetch.
The best lawyer show! Love the content, host, community.
What a lovely birthday tribute! Cheers to George and a life of overcoming!
no one is going to agree to go through her nonsense again. ever. it's done.she chose to be so painful to deal with .... and this is a very clear case.... it's done
The "problems" with appellate counsel might be that the first one doesn't actually work appeals. They subsequently assigned one that does, and as far as I know that person won't really deal with the convict as he looks for substantial errors at the trial court level.
Yes again Sarah is confused like the appellate court is going to weed through her letters for wrongdoings. They are only going by what's in the motion.❤😊
Wait! Wut! I can’t find anything new on the Take Care of Maya news. What’s going on with the attorneys? Do update us, please!!!
Last I saw they were no longer being represented by Anderson and were back with Whitney. Not sure how current that is though. An update would be very interesting
Thank you. I always learn from you.
Thank God
She will need to get along with her attorney now.
I’ve heard that the appeal attorney has little to no contact with the convict. Their job is to review the case file and file briefs if appropriate. Sarah’s head is going to explode.
@@mandystrong8196literally 😂 I'm sure she's already sent letters
@@mandystrong8196that's correct. She's done strategizing with a lawyer.
@Mandy...she will explode. Sarah refuses to acknowledge any truth that she feels would disregard her own wishes. She will insist that her rights are being trampled (again) and she will go to absurd lengths in attempting to contact this lawyer and try to "threaten" him with bad publicity. That's how her sick mind works.
Sarah will be writing letters to the governor for rest of her life . Its so nice that she will have busy work to keep her out of trouble with otber inmates
She harasses anyone who disagrees with her. In this case, the truth is that she is probably just bored and misses the camera in the courtroom.
@@Xgirly-1983 She has been writing to the gov since2020
What did Peter mean when he referred to the Maya case? I know the attorneys had a falling out, but what else is going on?
I’m happy it’s over. Of course she had to bleed this case dry. What else would we expect? She has a lot of time to think about her crime.
it's not over until she say's it's over. moar letters please.
Boon will never be over or think about Jorge as her victim..... SHE will always be a victim in her mind...... NEVER believe she is HER OWN VICTIM 👹💯✨️👹💯✨️👹💯✨️👹💯✨️
Sarah Boone will never be over, ... she will never reflect on Jorge , and will never take the blame of being the ABUSER in the relationship!! Sarah doesn't realize that she is the one that abuses herself!!! She is never going to be finished trying to cause some kind of trouble even in prison!!!
@@amandafranks2683have you seen any of the research on how being a victim of a narcissist can make the victim start acting like a narcissist in defense? If anything, I think that was what happened with Jorge. She considers him defending himself as attacking her. (Owens' argument about Jorge's fingers coming out of the suitcase being enough justification for SB to do what she did proved that to me.)
luv your commentary…
What!? I am shocked! I feel shocked Cotton!
Now thats funny😅😂
Hey Peter, can you cover The Rose Petal Trial? Out of South Carolina. A classical train pianist is charged with the murder of a woman. Lots of layers to this case but looks very interesting. Thanks for considering.
"A classical train" -- was it the Orient Express? Did the defendant regularly play aboard?
Can’t wait for Sarah’s letters to start showing up on the appellate docket… She is big mad
She has the rest of her life to forgive herself for not taking the plea deal! 😂
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but can't the Appeals court deny taking her appeal altogether?
Good question 🤔
Yes. The answer is yes, because an appeal is not guaranteed. The RIGHT to appeal is. Two very different things.
@@schrisdellopoulos9244exactly. A defendant has the RIGHT to apply for an appeal. The appellate court does NOT have to take the appeal.
She wants to appeal more for the attention than anything else.
Missed this.. watching on rewatch
What's going on with the Maya trial lawyers? I missed that.
Yay!!!🎉 But wait, isn't everyone entitled to an appeal Or am I wrong on that?
An appeal and a new trial are two different things. A new trial starts from zero and is a full trial again and appeal means the ruling gets overturned.
she is entitled to file an appeal, doesn't mean she will get an appeal and that isn't a new trial.
@@Ceeshore That's what I was asking… I thought an appeal with guaranteed?
@@Cataldoland Yes, you're correct, she has a right to appeal. The appeal isn't under discussion in this video; what's under discussion is the state's response to her motion for a new trial..
@@Cataldoland in states with a death penalty appeal is automatic. Sarah got life. don't know if SC has death penalty.
Did she seriously think she was going to get a new trial lol.
Yes because in her mind she did nothing wrong and they are all just not getting it. So at one point someone needs to get it and will let ger out because she did nothing wrong. She cant even grasp how we are all so stupid that we dont get it. Its so darn clear she did nothing wrong!!
@@Ashnod24like it wasn't intentional 😂 know that 😂
@@pamelaoliver8442 yes that why in Gods name dont we all just get that its so clear that it wasnt intentional!!! And that that makes everything right!!!
Yes. And I love her for it because otherwise she would've taken the plea deal. She dug herself a hole she can never get out of. If you look up the word narcissist, her picture should be there. 😂
Don't forget that JACS reimbursed mr Padilla 4,000 dollars to have all the discovery from the state printed out for sarah to have hard copies in 2020.
Re: Court appointed attorney, Owen’s stated he was getting paid. He was not pro bono. I was surprised to see she got funds after he stated she had worked out payment plan, including her divorce settlement from sale of house.
Oh what funds?❤
Their deal was that she pay him later when she gets out. So never
Didn't he tell the court that he was pro-bono in one of the first hearings and then in his next interview he went on about how he had worked out a payment plan with SB because it was important the client has some investment in the case (or some other type of nonsense)?
Can her statement made at time of sentencing be included by appellate court as well as the addendum statement? SB showed heartless comments made about everyone including the victim’s family.
No. Her statement at sentencing would have no implications on a possible appeal, which she's not going to get anyway.
🙋♀️ Hey there, Peter and staff. Thank you for this recap. Not sure anyone will see this comment, but if you do, please know I had to lower the speed on this video just to keep up with Peter’s rapid-fire speaking. Shazam! Don’t know if he either had an energy drink or several cups of coffee before taping, but I’ve never had such a challenging time keeping up, and am heading for my settings to lower the speed in order to finish. 😅
Hopefully, I’ve given you at least a brief giggle, along with my respectful hint-hint for the future. Hope y’all have a great Thursday! Appreciate all of you. 🖖
What’s going on with the lawyers from the Maya trial? I haven’t seen anything about that?
You straightened the L !! Yay!
Thanks!
You mentioned a trial (problems with the lawyers) but I don’t recognize the name. I replayed it over and over…to try and hear what you said but no luck. help!
I think it's the "Take care of Maya" trial he referred to.
@ oh thank you!
If this case wasn’t high profile, and IF there wasn’t the underlying doubt that this should’ve been first degree vs second degree murder (potentially allowing her to get a less deserved sentence, so they wanted to make sure they did everything possible to not allow her to have a chance at appeal) I doubt the court would’ve allowed her to go through so many lawyers to begin with, this is unheard of.
She was literally “choosing” her lawyers by what she was doing to make them withdraw (and we’ll never know the truth about how badly she might’ve treated them or what threats she might’ve made, since they can’t say), which is not allowed by someone who can’t pay for their own lawyer.
If she had claimed BSS and renewed all the evidence admissible from the beginning, I think the state would have gone for 1st degree. As it was, they had to really in the evidence that they knew was admissible; a lot of that was the convict's own testimoney.
@@doom4067 Agree. Was there not literally a text where Sarah said she'd "get rid of" Jorge like a month or two prior to his death?
Compelled to be a witness against herself Slam Dunk Blam !
COMMENT: Hi Peter, we covered Darrell Brooks move on another channel and he was moved to another state and we believe it was a security issue because his appeals attorney Covey was not made aware of the move in advance.
What channel?
Makes sense. Brooks would get himself into any trouble possible.
Tannika from two cents worth read out some stuff that owens and henderson did in the late nineties. SA more than once
Absolutely!! They are horrible horrible individuals! I can’t believe it took this long for it to come to light but I’m so glad it did
@sandib4623 it made me sick. I'm glad it has come to light as well
She is really something!
justice is served ,the killer is in prison for a long time ,may the victim rest in peace loretta
You don't need to sign your comment Boomer. We see your name in your handle 😅
I totally disagree. The court's denial of a right to counsel was the most perfectly crafted ruling imaginable, and it's UN imaginable an appeal court would fail to see that.
Thankfully no more of this woman
Off topic but having Peter say rockin and rollin has the song seagulls playing in my head 😂
Hello, hello!
If SB would have lawyered up, not said one word or agree to any questioning, kept her first attorney and wrote no letters she would have been convicted of some form of manslaughter and possibly be out of jail by now. Without her input the scene would have baffled police.
Too bad she thinks she is smarter than everyone. Also in her mind Jorge deserved what he got so why not tell everyone and they will see it the same way and she would be off scot-free
@ I hear ya. We all have right to remain silent unfortunately we don’t all have the ability to remain silent.
Will you keep covering the lively law suit and updates on Brian Kholberger
Owen’s left that day of sentencing knowing she wouldn’t win on appeal . She is toast. 1% win an Appeal.
😮
Correct me if im wrong but it would seem at first impression that the state courts cannot issue such an order if appeals procedurally lie in the federal district court or the federal circuit court of appeals.
I bet that plea deal is looking sweet to her now! 😂
It makes me so happy to think about that sweet sweet plea deal she was too megalomaniacal to take. SO happy.
I think we all know that plea deal was more than fair and a fantastic offer; but Sarah is incapable of mentally grasping that.
Her twisted thinking only sees that she did nothing wrong, is the victim, and everyone that does not believe her is wrong.
@prasnlrdsheilawalker5241 I think it was not fair. She could have applied for ealy release after 6 years. What she did to the victim was too cruel.
@@mariee.5912 absolutely 💯!! I was really angry at the prosecution at the time but obviously the universe has its own way of sorting it all out.
wait, what's going on with the Maya lawyers? I watched the documentary on Netflix after I saw this video. Watching a few of your older videos about her case. OMG. So tragic
She's in high security because the state isn't stupid. We see her as a joke but unfortunately psychopaths like Boone are highly manipulative and she's a danger in prison because she has already gotten in trouble for manipulating and creating drama with other prisoners
Hip hip hooray 🎉
Odd here uk we call it jail its same thing
When did you stop using the spelling "gaol"? Is this due to American-English influence on you, personally?
I learned about prison/jail differences as an adult. I thought the terms were synonyms.
I believe jail is a city or county holding facility. It is usually "short term". Meaning 5 years or less, I believe, could be wrong about the time frame. But it is for city or county crimes.
Prison is the state holding facility, for longer term or state prosecution, including shorter term sentences but are state level prosecutions.
but but but all sarahs gold 😂
I would have loved to have seen Judge Dorow preside over this case.
Yessssss😅
No way!!!
All good 17 years plea deal to life.
She'd be out in 6. She could have seen her son grow up. I cannot wrap my brain around her.
@marlysmithsonian5746 that's assuming that she would not get in trouble in prison.
Sarah Boone accuses Jorge of raping her. It's defamation‼️In Sweden, you can be punished for accusing someone without proof. You can also be charged with defamation, even if it is true "The penalty for defamation is a fine. If the defamation is considered serious, the penalty can be a fine or imprisonment for up to six months." Do you don't have any law like this in the US?
I believe that statements made as part of legal procedure are privileged in order to allow witnesses to speak freely and openly in trial, so unless Sarah was broadcasting these allegations outside of court, I don't think there's a claim for defamation. I'm sure Judge Kraynick had his own opinions on the truthfulness of her complaints, and that in part led to the life sentence.
No one believed her anyway. And the other reply iscorrect
But the Torres family needs to sue owensfor lying at his first Boone press conference
@@user-mv5zt8qd9l Thank you for good explanation.
@@TheeSnitch I see.
Great news.
I really think we should move pass Sarah now, it was entertaining but it’s just too much now
If you decide to move past Sarah in a prison corridor, be sure to watch your back.
You are correct about moving past her, but is is hard, at least for me. It captivated my attention for many years kind of like a soap opera.
There are a couple channels out that are dragging the story out after the conviction and sentencing which is IMO too much. The case is closed. End of story, but the Sarah Boone withdrawal is real.