What feud? The Beatles and Stones became friends when they first met in 1963 and helped each other. In 1995 Paul and Noel helped Paul Weller with his version of Come Together. Get your facts straight
Again this channel just speaks words and draws conclusions based on just a few words without even looking at the source. There are no real facts. You said Paul McCartney hated The Rolling Stones. Are you serious? The Beatles and the Stones have ALWAYS been friends. Even from the earliest days when these bands were just starting out, they helped each other and were friends. This has always been said by everyone in those bands, including Paul. Paul back in the 80's said in an interview that "I love The Rolling Stones, they're a great rock and roll band". And even in more modern interviews, of which I've seen many, he always spoke well of the Stones and said he loves their music. The "blues cover band" was just taken out of context and it was something Paul himself said to Keith Richards. He actually thought of them as a "blues cover band" when he first saw them in the early 60's, of course he change his opinion since.
Oasis...whatever. As for the Beatles and the Rolling Stones, it's very well known that they all hung out as friends and mates and still do, those remaining. Also Paul and John helped out the Stones and yes there was some obvious copying (which is a sincere form of flattery). You really shouldn't believe everything in the papers.... a lot of it was creative publicity. Just ask Andrew Loog Oldham....
Both bands I do not like. To me it starts with the Doors, Jimi Hendrugs, cream,Iron Butterfly and then Deep Purple mark 2., Sabbath and all the bands after. Just my opinion please all Beatles fans just relax don't Twist and shout.
At last, someone tells the truth about the Beatles. I grew up in the ‘60’s during Beatlemania. When they released Yellow Submarine we were done with them. It’s not Rock n Roll, it’s silly elevator and grocery store music. Paul’s solo career was a continuation of silly music. I did like Take It Away.
Everything Paul McCartney did was a boring cliche. His timing was poor. His playing was very stiff and limited. And the melodies we're nothing more than nursery rhymes.
@@JenniferThomas-ui4bl The Beatles basically lasted less than 10 years but look at all they accomplished musically in that short period.They are widely regarded as the most influential band of all time and the recognition of popular music as an art form.
You are absolutely correct That is why they had such little success I also hate that bubblegum shit especially While my Guitar Gentle Weeps , Happiness Is A Warm Gun , Helter Skelter , Tomorrow Never Knows etc Dumb dumb
The Press made them enemies. Keith said, John hung out a hella lot with the Stones in late 60's almost more than the Beatles.
Now, now, Paul...we don't hate.
Oasis? They schold not be mentioned at all.
What feud? The Beatles and Stones became friends when they first met in 1963 and helped each other. In 1995 Paul and Noel helped Paul Weller with his version of Come Together. Get your facts straight
Who DID get along with Oasis??
Beatles and Oasis rivalry? They didn't even exist at anything remotely like the same time.
Both the Rolling Stones and the Beatles played cover tunes.
And.....
I agree with you trillion percent dude
I clearly remember this but the thing is what I would hear is George harrisons hatred toward Oasis quite a few times and nothing from Paul or Ringo
How many oasis songs can most people remember ? ..........exactly! same with Mick and the lads ! Macca don't Hate them..... he laughs at them !
As much as I like Oasis, for me they are considered more of a poor man's Badfinger garage band.
Oasis ? The Stones? Who did your fact checking?
The Beatles and The Stones released entirely different bands. You can’t compare them
Oasis are a Beatles tribute band...not in the same league..
Again this channel just speaks words and draws conclusions based on just a few words without even looking at the source. There are no real facts. You said Paul McCartney hated The Rolling Stones. Are you serious? The Beatles and the Stones have ALWAYS been friends. Even from the earliest days when these bands were just starting out, they helped each other and were friends. This has always been said by everyone in those bands, including Paul. Paul back in the 80's said in an interview that "I love The Rolling Stones, they're a great rock and roll band". And even in more modern interviews, of which I've seen many, he always spoke well of the Stones and said he loves their music. The "blues cover band" was just taken out of context and it was something Paul himself said to Keith Richards. He actually thought of them as a "blues cover band" when he first saw them in the early 60's, of course he change his opinion since.
There are lots of Stones songs that are unique and not blues influenced - you need to check out ALL their music.
Oasis...whatever. As for the Beatles and the Rolling Stones, it's very well known that they all hung out as friends and mates and still do, those remaining. Also Paul and John helped out the Stones and yes there was some obvious copying (which is a sincere form of flattery). You really shouldn't believe everything in the papers.... a lot of it was creative publicity. Just ask Andrew Loog Oldham....
Paul McCartney is not respected by musicians. Even Quincy Jones spoke out about how the Beatles weren't skilled musicians.
He released too many silly songs.
Paul McCartney hated The Beatles. !!!!!!!
All kidding a side, Ian Anderson hates Paul McCartney. !!!!!!1
And Ian Anderson is hated by Robert Plant. Because he once made fun of Led Zeppelin's lyrics 😅
Who writes this inaccurate drivel, and more important, why do we insist on giving it an audience?
I’m so tired of the damned Beatles
Both bands I do not like. To me it starts with the Doors, Jimi Hendrugs, cream,Iron Butterfly and then Deep Purple mark 2., Sabbath and all the bands after. Just my opinion please all Beatles fans just relax don't Twist and shout.
Paul McCartney sucks. What he did was bubblegum nursery rhyme garbage.
At last, someone tells the truth about the Beatles. I grew up in the ‘60’s during Beatlemania. When they released Yellow Submarine we were done with them. It’s not Rock n Roll, it’s silly elevator and grocery store music. Paul’s solo career was a continuation of silly music. I did like Take It Away.
Beatles were great and influential, but they were overrated.
Everything Paul McCartney did was a boring cliche. His timing was poor. His playing was very stiff and limited. And the melodies we're nothing more than nursery rhymes.
Yep
That explains why he’s he’d such little success
And guess which band is still going not the bugs
The Stones are AWESOME!!! 🎸🎸
Considering that one member has been dead since 1980...um, yeah they wouldn't have gone on since then.
@@jonnuanez7183 they disband before he died
@@JenniferThomas-ui4bl The Beatles basically lasted less than 10 years but look at all they accomplished musically in that short period.They are widely regarded as the most influential band of all time and the recognition of popular music as an art form.
Paul McCartney sucked. He was no better than the groups he criticized. The Beatles were just bubblegum garbage.
You are absolutely correct
That is why they had such little success
I also hate that bubblegum shit especially While my Guitar Gentle Weeps , Happiness Is A Warm Gun , Helter Skelter , Tomorrow Never Knows etc
Dumb dumb
😂😂😂😂 you are stoopid!