Well I suppose if current demographic trends continue much of western Europe will get to experience a similar "transformation" after European people become a minority in their homelands and the immigrants take over, but where will people flee? By then Canada USA Australia might be just as bad, at least Rhodesians in the 70s could flee to westernized countries when they saw the writing on the wall, maybe people will go to eastern Europe or south America or something
@@lilsleepy1969 Perhaps that is his point: the 'writing on the wall' was as regards the unseemliness of a society where a white minority is dominant; subsequent to this becoming de rigueur, white Rhodesians almost exclusively decamped to societies where a white majority was dominant. But, as Mr. Thompson has pointed out, if current trends continue, bar the opening up of Space as a new frontier there will eventually be no such societies, and those who preferred things done the white/western way, whatever that may be, will have nowhere which to decamp to. At which point they will finally be forced to choose between asserting minority rule, even if only to regain their majority status, or being consigned to the dungheap of history (which, if current trends continue, they will join anyway, being unwilling to bring as many into this world as are passing from it). What white Rhodesians were able to achieve as but a tiny minority ought to be instructive should the time ever come when h. sapiens occidentum considers itself worthy of living up to what were once its own standards.
@@bartplantinga5849 well I cannot be for or against something that doesn't exist anymore. But if you are asking about white supremacy I am against that. But clearly these states without heavy support from the Soviet Union and it's allies would have never prevail. Hindsight is 20/20 but it could have turn out differently 5-8 years later. No Cuban's no material support from USSR if either this war starts later or Afghanistan start earlier. How different Southern Africa would be who knows....
They lost - politically, not militarily - because Britain could not let another "colony" declare it's independence unilaterally...think America 1776. When Britain turned her back on Rhodesia, the US did the same (reality was, the US had no clue what was going on there but wanted to support Britain). When I get together with my old political science colleagues, we all pretty much agree that Rhodesia was the first real victim of social-justice-political-correctness and they paid the price. Mugabe took a prosperous First World country, the "Breadbasket" of Subsaharan Africa" and plunged it into poverty, starvation, and despotism. Smith was proven right.
It’s spelled ZimbaBwe. Besides being illiterate, you are ill informed. Zimbawe has become one of Africa’s most tragic stories, with the land being supported by a diaspora so wide spread, you will find Zimabweans living in every nation on earth, sending money home. The greatest import to the country is foreign currency from nationals who cannot live in the land that is their true home because it has been destroyed in the name of ‘freedom.’ We can do without your viva, thanks very much.
Thanks for this video it means a lot.
Your welcome!
Отличное видео!
Well I suppose if current demographic trends continue much of western Europe will get to experience a similar "transformation" after European people become a minority in their homelands and the immigrants take over, but where will people flee? By then Canada USA Australia might be just as bad, at least Rhodesians in the 70s could flee to westernized countries when they saw the writing on the wall, maybe people will go to eastern Europe or south America or something
One thing you're missing though: white Rhodesians never were the majority, buddy
@lilsleepy1969 yet Israel exists
@@lilsleepy1969 Perhaps that is his point: the 'writing on the wall' was as regards the unseemliness of a society where a white minority is dominant; subsequent to this becoming de rigueur, white Rhodesians almost exclusively decamped to societies where a white majority was dominant. But, as Mr. Thompson has pointed out, if current trends continue, bar the opening up of Space as a new frontier there will eventually be no such societies, and those who preferred things done the white/western way, whatever that may be, will have nowhere which to decamp to.
At which point they will finally be forced to choose between asserting minority rule, even if only to regain their majority status, or being consigned to the dungheap of history (which, if current trends continue, they will join anyway, being unwilling to bring as many into this world as are passing from it). What white Rhodesians were able to achieve as but a tiny minority ought to be instructive should the time ever come when h. sapiens occidentum considers itself worthy of living up to what were once its own standards.
I'm sad for Rhodesia
what zimbawwarere ... the failed sate ??
God Bless Rhodesia!
Шалос бродяга)))грин лидер красава
RIP BOZO
Achtung! Redditor!!
so if this all great how the fuck they lost ? really ? couldnt't be Bob Marley ... could it ?
are you pro or against rhodesia?
@@bartplantinga5849 well I cannot be for or against something that doesn't exist anymore. But if you are asking about white supremacy I am against that. But clearly these states without heavy support from the Soviet Union and it's allies would have never prevail. Hindsight is 20/20 but it could have turn out differently 5-8 years later. No Cuban's no material support from USSR if either this war starts later or Afghanistan start earlier. How different Southern Africa would be who knows....
@@NixUgriBugri so you are pro Zimabwe
They lost - politically, not militarily - because Britain could not let another "colony" declare it's independence unilaterally...think America 1776. When Britain turned her back on Rhodesia, the US did the same (reality was, the US had no clue what was going on there but wanted to support Britain). When I get together with my old political science colleagues, we all pretty much agree that Rhodesia was the first real victim of social-justice-political-correctness and they paid the price. Mugabe took a prosperous First World country, the "Breadbasket" of Subsaharan Africa" and plunged it into poverty, starvation, and despotism. Smith was proven right.
@Christiaan Hollander hallo mede Nederlander
Fascism rhodesian, puaj. Viva Zimbawe🇿🇼🇿🇼🇿🇼💪💪from Argentina🇦🇷🇦🇷
How's it goin' in Zimbabwe, terr? Hyperinflation feels good? One-party rule? State failure? 😏😎
@@Briselance Nazi-rodhesian??? 😧😁🖕💪🇦🇷🇿🇼💪
It’s spelled ZimbaBwe. Besides being illiterate, you are ill informed. Zimbawe has become one of Africa’s most tragic stories, with the land being supported by a diaspora so wide spread, you will find Zimabweans living in every nation on earth, sending money home. The greatest import to the country is foreign currency from nationals who cannot live in the land that is their true home because it has been destroyed in the name of ‘freedom.’ We can do without your viva, thanks very much.
Long live Rhodesia! "They can shout their words of hate" but Rhodesia will always thrive and prosper!!